China's Housing Crash Just Wiped Out 20 Years of Price Growth
(thedeepdive.ca)
from return2ozma@lemmy.world to world@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 07:52
https://lemmy.world/post/49137397
from return2ozma@lemmy.world to world@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 07:52
https://lemmy.world/post/49137397
#world
threaded - newest
Good. The way it should be. Housing is not wealth storage, it’s a place to live.
Let’s hope this fall spreads out of China.
That does assume the Chinese housing market is the same as in many western countries though. But if so, bring it on.
It fits somewhat with American sunbelt cities where there is significant growth and large developers building new houses. One issue which is common across borders is that real estate was a common way for people to invest their retirement savings; wiping out a lot of the savings of people near or at retirement isn’t healthy. One issue that is more local to China is that Chinese provinces and municipalities have little ability to raise taxes, so they’ve been using development as a way to raise money; a lot of these governments have a lot of debt and few good ways to pay it back.
It’s great for people who want to buy a house, great for ultra rich that want to buy out more property, but absolutely fucking people who just bought a house not too long ago.
I feel like people forget that a significant portion of America lives in a place where the cost-of-living isn’t ridiculously high. A housing crash might make houses slightly more affordable in San Francisco, but it would be economically devastating to the interior of the country.
Honestly it probably wouldn’t even be that great for people who wanted to buy a house. Banks aren’t likely to start handing out mortgages to people who couldn’t afford the house a couple weeks ago in what is now a volatile market, and you would still be competing with companies who could pay cash.
Actually when things are less expensive they are easier to buy.
For everyone… not just poor people who need a loan, but people who can pay cash too… which is what I said.
That is how supply and demand works, though. If the prices drop, and suddenly cash buyers start pouring out of the woodwork, that will drive prices back up.
When you see prices fall, it necessarily means the cash buyers are not just swooping in and grabbing everything.
Yes which would mean that the cash buyers would have all the houses and the people who needed loans wouldn’t. Which was my point.
That is not what that means.
I promise I understand what you’re saying. I’m saying the fault in your logic is misunderstanding the upward pressure of cash buyers.
When prices fall, it isn’t chum in the water for corporate cash buyers. What it means is that those same buyers were ALWAYS there, and are now leaving. The absence of thier buy pressure is the cause of the prices falling.
The fault in your logic is thinking there won’t be more cash buyers if prices dropped.
But then the prices go up again.
The price of anything is the balance of buyers and sellers.
The price TELLS you where the equilibrium is. It is the OUTPUT of the function.
Houses aren’t Hienz Ketchup. Head office doesn’t just decree a house price. You’re imagining the housing market works like Taylor swift tickets from ticket master.
You don’t even have to hypothesize on this because housing markets have been swinging around for decades. People on the sidelines were able to buy houses after 2008 that they’d never have been able to afford otherwise. It worked out GREAT for people who has been sidelined.
I entered the market at the brief but violent housing downturn in late 2019. I never would have been able to otherwise.
They suck for people who own a home and are depending on thier equity. It sucks for people who own a home and the banks get nervous.
Whenever I hear people saying to people without homes “be careful what you wish for” when they are wishing houses were cheaper… I just hear my old boss telling me how I shouldn’t want a raise because it’ll “bump me into a higher tax bracket”.
It’s bullshit half-truths which sound just plausible enough to convince you to not act in your own best interests.
If you own a property, its in your own financial best interests to have the value increase. If you do not own property, but want to, you want the price to go down.
You’re oversimplifying. Obviously if I want to buy a house I want the price to go down. What we are talking about here is that cheaper housing isn’t the only consequence of lower housing prices. And I’m not sure that comparing it to saying a higher tax bracket is in any way an adequate comparison given the tax brackets just don’t work that way at all. Like I wouldn’t even call that a half truth.
I’m also not saying that nobody would benefit, what I’m trying to point out is that the net gain wouldn’t be the same as say legislation that actually increased the housing supply. If your end goal is to be able to own a house wishing for a housing market crash isn’t the best wish you can make. Private equity firms bought more houses after the 2008 crash than the people sitting on the sidelines.
At the end of the day what you’re actually wishing for is one last housing crash otherwise you’re just hoping that it crashes again for other people after you buy your house and you’re stuck there.
Ok, I can accept what I think I just read:
“Although a drop in housing prices would provide a reprieve to those who do not own, the fundamental structure of housing as a commodity is the greater beast that must be defeated”
Now, that’s true, I’m 100% on board.
I do feel like people sometimes let perfect become the enemy of good. “The homeless guy doesn’t need a handout, he needs a job”, they mutter as they walk on by.
If you wanna think that long term, I actually don’t think you’ve gone far enough. Government supply initiatives? A start, but still a bandaid. Massive increasing tax rates on multiple ownership. Cap on residential property that can be owned by Corporations. Rent controls. Pull no punches to establish that housing is not a viable speculative investment. You build to sell to people who will live there.
What about the equity you’re about to decimate? Government needs to get back big time into the pension game. Big time. How will I live? Eat? Get medical care as I age? Needs a fix.
Until those broad changes occur, I’ll still be cheering every dip.
I had a feeling we were only disagreeing on the means not the ends.
Less than 20% is significant?
www.census.gov/…/urban-rural-populations.html
I didn’t realize only rural areas had a lower cost of living than San Francisco…
I didn’t realize San Francisco is the only city in the US. Rent in every single urban area is out of control. A two bedroom apartment that I rented in Lexington, KY from 1996-2011 for $500 a month is now $1,800.
A studio apartment that I rented in Altoona, PA from 2011- 2013 for $700 a month is now $1200.
I could keep looking, as I have rented places in 38 states.
No where that isn’t rural is cheap in the US anymore. Even the most “affordable” cities are boasting about 1 br apartments that are $1,000+ a month.
I hate to break it to you but those prices are barely more than inflation. $700 in 2011 is $1065 today. And I didn’t say anything about San Francisco being the only city in the US now you’re just reaching.
Not reaching, just using your own hyperbole in reverse.
I hate to break it to you, but inflation hasn’t done a thing to minimum wage, or wages in general.
In what way was pointing out that there are places in America with a lower cost of living than San Francisco that aren’t rural hyperbole?
I never said it did, in fact that has absolutely nothing to do with what I’m talking about.
San Francisco isn’t the only place where housing is unaffordable. That’s how it’s hyperbole.
Ahh, so you’re fine with price gouging in the name of inflation, but fuck the workers that have to pay those prices. Got it.
I never said it was. Why are you just making shit up?
No I never said that either… seriously what the fuck is your problem?
If inflation has nothing to do with wages, than it shouldn’t have anything to do with prices. You said fuck workers by logical extension.
OK… Now where in that sentence do I say that San Francisco is the only city in America or the only place with a high cost of living, or that I’m OK with price gouging?
I edited my previous comment, so I will copy the relevant part to answer your second question.
Since according to you, inflation should be tied to housing prices, but is irrelevant to wages, you just said “fuck the workers,” by logical extension.
As far as you saying that San Francisco is the only city in America, you did that with your hyperbolic statement that indicated that you think that San Francisco is the only place that is unaffordable.
You clearly have a reading comprehension problem or you’re just being a troll either way I’m done with this conversation.
If you just bought (assuming standard 30 yr mortgage), all you have to do is hold through it. Refinance if that becomes favorable.
The only losers are those who are free and clear or toward the end of their mortgage AND looking to utilize the equity they built up, OR anyone looking to sell. The solution is time, which can kinda suck, but it’s vastly preferable to not having a place to live.
Building and renting out should be profitable. Else nothing is built for renters. Problem is companies buying homes (not building) and try to bribe local politics to upgrade zoning laws for more profitable housing (more flats per m2 land, less living quality). There are cases where lots should be merged for upgrading zonings but this should come from the communities needs not companies’ greeds.
Building and renting out should be non-profit based. It should cover it’s cost, but not be attractive to investors - that keeps the prices from rising. Doesn’t mean that the people doing this work shouldn’t be able to live a decent life, but non-profits can pay normal salaries too.
The result is property developers buying up swathes of land and leaving it vacant until the market reaches a frenzy and they can charge an unholy price for their crappy tract homes built by subcontractors under extreme cost reduction pressures. It doesn’t meet market demand, not remotely.
Zoning and local councils are certainly complicit.
The kiwis in New Zealand have seen the prices fall by a third iirc
The problem is that a lot of Chinese elderly used housing as a storage of wealth.
Time to buy a vacation home in China?
It peaked in 2021, so apparently prices have been declining for 5 years, and are still declining!!
The Chinese economy may be weird, but I don’t get how prices can fall below what they were 20 years ago, when China is much richer today than they were back then? We were told for a long time China was in a huge housing bubble, but this is crazy!
This will guaranteed ruin many peoples economy for decades even for the rest of their lives. And many will be tied to their house because it’s impossible to sell at a price that will clear the debt, so they can’t afford to move.
In a normal market it’s nice to own your own house, but a market like this, if you bought 5 years ago, it’s a nightmare.
China was building housing like crazy, and companies kept the prices artificially inflated, even though that created literal ghost towns and a number of buildings had to be demolished due to safety reasons...
Now with the bubble popped, prices are resetting to market value, and since this means a new swathe of newly affordable housing, that availability drives prices down even further.
Think of it like this: you're sitting on 3 million tonnes of apples. You're selling each apple for $50. Nobody but a few idiots are buying them. Then you suddenly need the cash, and start dropping the prices - you have to go below market rates to offload all those apples to raise capital. And the raw amount of supply means you're going way under market prices, dragging other sellers with you.
Yes I know all that, bubbles result in stupid projects and poor quality, and banks stupidly believing growth will continue, so loaning to buy a house is easy. that’s the same here. I know how bubbles work.
But China has had an economic growth rate on an average of 10% many years of that period, it’s slowed down a bit in recent years but is still high.
But let’s say 15 years with 10% growth, that means the economy has grown 4 times in 15 years!!
So it’s crazy that prices fall back to less than when the economy was only 25% of what it is now.
Your description doesn’t explain that.
The housing market is different in China. Most home are paid entirely at sale without a loan.
Oooh, could we get some of that?
<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/960d617e-2c47-4a56-a35f-e52d4f5a4260.png">
Breaking news, looks like I’m applying for Chinese citizenship.
I wonder how many people on Lemmy want to move to China based on what they’ve heard about it on this collective network or in their own circles. How many of those people would be sorely disappointed if they did?
A lot of them come across as Ariel in Disney’s The Little Mermaid. They have an incomplete understanding of China and also likely have legitimate reasons to not want to live where they are.