"Portal" Between Dublin and NYC Shut Down After OnlyFans Model Flashes It
(ca.news.yahoo.com)
from Wilshire@lemmy.world to world@lemmy.world on 14 May 2024 20:51
https://lemmy.world/post/15407746
from Wilshire@lemmy.world to world@lemmy.world on 14 May 2024 20:51
https://lemmy.world/post/15407746
#world
threaded - newest
For those curious, here’s from the other side. www.rte.ie/news/2024/0513/1448890-dublin-portal/
Not the view people are going to be hoping for…
Hehehe
Very different perspective indeed. The OP article is sensational and refers to the "chaos" that ensure.
Toplessness is legal in New York, but I don't think flashing would be. Not sure about the laws in Dublin.
This was obviously a business move to draw fans to the OF site. The better article didn't publicize the woman's name.
Yeah, it’s the same dummy that licked an airplane seat during covid.
Ah, sounds like someone going for the herostratus approach to fame
The portal is a genuinely fun idea. I’d love to see those all around!
But… people being people got to ruin all the fun. So… I don’t suppose I’ll be seeing one of these any time soon.
Blah.
It’s not a genuine view into my city, unless a homeless guy stabs it and takes a shit in front of it
There’s another such portal between the Polish city of Lublin and the capital of Lithuania, Vilnius.
wikipedia.org/wiki/Vilnius-Lublin_Portal
Why is there so much whatever over a big tv/monitor, and a webcam…I really don’t get humans fascinations with this when they presumably all own the same stuff at home.
Yeah… Chatroulette never had any of these issues. I just don’t get the huplah over boobs.
The fascination is that you have an audience.
OMG Boobs! Does nobody think of the Children?!?!?!?!
Pathetic
public toplessness is legal in NYC and has been since 2010 for everyone. i’m guessing that it’s not in Dublin?
well she wasn’t in dublin, this whole thing is dumb lol
Lol nope! Republic of Ireland has been a heavily-Catholic country since its inception. It's lightened in recent years and some surprises do slip through but that ain't one of them.
Pretty sure a guy mooned nyc so wtf?
Man ass is verifiably less offensive to religious types than any part of a woman being visible.
I’d churn my own butter at the sight of a woman’s bare ankle bone. Best to just punish women for that. It’s impossible to control my own urges.
vile, never heard it said this way before, I’m stealing this for personal use
This doesn’t make sense so why do they hate gays then?
Because they find gay sex unappealing, seems to be the main reason. If you point out that that is simply because they’re not gay, they are unable to understand the point.
It’s the enjoying part that is frowned upon. They assume everyone loves seeing boobs so they must be punished for that. A bare man ass is comical at best for most. If they thought people were enjoying it they must be punished
Because Catholicism.
Catholics believe that any sexual activity that doesn't have a chance of making a baby is sinful. Gays obviously can't make babies as a normal part of their love making, so that's where the whole 'being gay is sinful' bit comes from
What does being addicted to cats have to do with anything!? How many cats do you have to own before you become a Catholics?
The usual tell is when you need to have a cat in the morning just to function.
I don’t think you’ve been to Ireland in a long long time if you think the church has any moral or real power over society as a whole here.
Might read past the headline.
Probably wasn’t the only time. People generally being people is probably why they shut it down.
Lol typical Americans snowflakes “9/11 too soon”
Ask Irish people what they think about the drink “Irish car bomb”
Probably that it taste disgusting and super sweet like “American” food.
Tell me you don’t know what an Irish car bomb is without telling me you don’t know what an Irish car bomb is.
…Irish car bombs have Bailey’s Irish Cream and possibly coffee liqueur in them. Many people would say that’s a pretty sweet drink.
You sure you’re not thinking of an Irish Boilermaker? That’s just a beer with Irish whiskey.
I think this is a regional thing, as you just made me doubt myself.
I’ve ordered car bombs here in the Midwest and it’s always been whiskey and a stout. I don’t know if I’d call anything with just coffee liqueur in it a “car bomb” that’s not a very strong drink.
A quick Wikipedia check says it can be either Irish cream or whiskey, and that the names are somewhat interchangeable.
Irish carbomb is a glass of Guinness and half a shot of Jameson Irish whiskey and half a shot of bailey’s Irish creme. Drop the shot in and chug the delicious concoction.
Delicious as say a chocolate milkshake?
Can’t say I’ve ever had the cream
Wow, you’re pleasant.
See, where I’m from, a carbomb is a cocktail made from beer and hard liquor. We’ve got Chicago carbombs/handshakes which is Malort and Old Style. I’ve even had a Mexican carbomb with tequila and Modelo.
Coffee liqueur and beer isn’t really a thing where I’m from, in the heart of corn country. So you’re the one drinking milk shakes at the bar as far as I’m concerned.
Maybe instead of being a dick to people because of where they happen to live, you could try to learn about cultural and regional differences.
Removed, Civility
That doesn’t really seem very equivalent. The closest equivalence I can think of is either the terrorism of the founding fathers, which is too far back to really strike the same chord, or maybe like, american drone strikes or something. Or, maybe if I was feeling particularly cheeky, I might compare it to the violence enacted by the civil rights movement, since that was also a domestic american liberation movement maybe comparable to the IRA, but, I dunno. not really any american style equivalence there.
I hope you can cure your asimptote.
? what does this mean
Removed, civility.
Thatll stop em from being people
Based
I’m not saying it was a good thing to do, but once you have that idea, it becomes an irresistible temptation. The 9/11 one, although I guess it might be true of the other one, too.
I can’t believe people were subjected to boobs, unbelievable
they’re gonna need therapy
Psychosomatic
And he also made false teeth
Addict insane
Desensitisation therapy of course
Exactly, bigots are the reason we can’t have nice things.
For a very short moment there were two nice things though 🤔
misogynistic jerks gonna be misogynistic jerks too, it appears.
Lmao she’s an of girl and you’re calling me misogynistic? Do you even know what it means? 😂😂😂
What does her being an only fans girl have to do with her needing to be locked up?
Also are you saying it’s impossible to be misogynistic towards an only fans girl?
If a guy took his penis out, wouldn’t he be locked up for public exposure? Why the double standard always with women, it’s sickening.
If a guy went topless nobody would have given a fuck is the more appropriate comparison, the fact that you have to intentionally reach for the wrong example to make your point work is proof, that the people calling you misogynistic are not far off.
I didn’t know guys had breasts, thanks for that clarification.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breast
Women tend to have more tissue and larger size as a secondary sex characteristic, but both men and women develop breast tissue. Men and women both have breasts.
No they don’t. Men’s breast tissue goes away from 6 months to 2 years of age.
If they continue to have it, its an issue.
Men over a certain age can get it due to weight or other issues, but it’s not a fact to say that men have breasts.
Congratulations on learning something new! Guys have always had breasts. That’s the way human anatomy works. They may not be as developed, but they’re always there to some degree. They can even excrete liquid through their nipples in some cases!
The skinniest dude in the world still has breast tissue. You might want to pick another hill to die on.
No need to insult others; read the rules.
And it seems you failed high school anatomy; go search the web about men’s breast tissue then come back and apologize.
The fetus forms the breast tissue and nipples before the emergence of testosterone. Here is an article. But it doesn’t matter because you live in your own reality and won’t believe anybody no matter what they link. So no, I won’t apologize.
Removed, Civility
It is not illegal to be topless in NYC, regardless of gender.
You bringing up genetals is on you
In New York, exposing genitals is illegal for everyone.
In New York, exposing nipples is legal for everyone.
You’re the one advocating for a double standard.
If you just want the law to be “women can’t wear things that make my peepee hard”, move to Saudi Arabia.
You people don’t get that she flashed Dublin, where it’s NOT legal, but nice try though.
Is she responsible for following another country’s laws?
If an American shows a Brit their 10” hunting knife on webcam, should they be locked up?
Nice try, though. And nice attempt to move the goalpost away from your asinine reframing of equal rights as a “sickening” double standard.
Really? So why was it shutdown for inappropriate behavior if no one did anything wrong as you claim?
Stop protecting these 304 clowns
And now the goalpost moves from illegal enough to deserve being locked up, to “inappropriate behavior” in the opinion of the people running the webcam.
Are you capable of arguing in good faith?
Are you capable of seeing the issue?
No. Are you capable of sticking to one claim long enough to defend it, or are you just raging at the filthy whores?
What did you go through in life to have such a side effect. I feel dirty replying to you eww I’m gonna stop
Hahaha man you’re hilarious! Thanks for your comments about men not having breasts and how Irish law is valid in the US. Made my day!
Try researching about men having breasts after a certain age, send me the articles that proves your point please.
If men don’t have breasts, how do they get breast cancer?
Very rare cases of a growth in the tissue that shouldn’t be there.
But chest is used for men’s upper torso, breasts are used for women’s.
Women have chests as well…
If she flashed her pussy, you might have a point.
yes, it’s when an immature jerk on the internet thinks it’s okay to insult a woman because she had the absolute nerve to earn money in a way his puritan mindset doesn’t approve of.
For what crime?
Uh, indecent exposure? Public nudity?
In New York, women have the same rights as men as far as those laws are concerned. There are annual topless bike rides, for fuck’s sake. Damn puritans trying to force their religious repression on the rest of us. Same people would’ve publicly whipped women for showing their ankles had they been born a bit earlier.
Out of the loop. What's a 304?
My mind is going towards HTML status codes.
Lol… Type it in a calculator and turn it upside down
A ‘voe’?
Ha, I wonder if that’s what it means in Zelda 😂
Voe are not allowed in Gerudo Town!
“hoe”.
Thanks for explaining it, not sure why you’ve collected those downvotes.
No problem.
And People probably don’t agree that of girls are 304’s, that’s why. Even though it was just an explanation, they still don’t agree with the naming, so it causes downvotes.
Yeah, it’s probably shooting the messenger. Reminds me of once on Reddit where someone had asked a similar question and I’d replied with a sourced quote from the dictionary and got complaining replies and downvotes.
People have nothing better to do… I find it funny actually that people dedicate that much time to online shouting matches lol
Because they’re both extremely misogynistic and also trying to argue against human anatomy.
Dude, a 304 is a real thing
What do you call a prostitute then?
It’s a derogatory term used to dehumanize people. I call a prostitute a sex worker out of respect, but it’s entirely irrelevant to this conversation unless you’re just gonna go off on a completely different level of misogyny.
Indeed, so why change names to a number even?
Do you also attack dictionaries for explaining offensive words? The person I’m talking to never used the term, they merely explained the meaning behind the number.
What you are doing is shooting the messenger. Please target your outrage more carefully in future.
If they use them in an obviously offensive way, yes.
The person who gave the explanation is the same person who initially used it to mean offense. You can check the usernames to see exactly this.
They’re an ass. There is no messenger.
They're also the one straight up using the term, which is why I asked in the first place (that being I had no clue what it meant)
“Not Modified”?
http.cat
Yep! Can you tell I fuck around on computers way too much?
Garden tool often used as derogatory slang for a promiscuous woman
Rake?
Rake actually does include a similar definition
a dissolute person : libertine
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rake
Yes, that’s the joke.
THIS IS WHY WE CAN’T HAVE NICE… hey those are nice.
“One person on the Irish side went as far as to show the New Yorkers images of 9/11 on his phone, according to The Guardian.”
oh boy.
Yeah New Yorkers are pretty well known for being shrinking violets.
I don’t know what they were hoping to accomplish, a lot of Americans practically observe 9/11 as a holiday, complete with documentaries showing off all the footage we have
Should have just told the New Yorkers their Pizza is over rated.
WW3 material for New Yorkers, right there
Are new yorkers really that high strung about it? I would think if anything they’d get more mad about like, insults to hot dog carts or something, but that might strike me more as a philly or chicago kind of thing, come to think of it. Maybe bagels? I feel like the average new york bagel is probably a better kind of undersung food hero, compared to the average overpriced to shit new york slice.
Bold of you to assume anyone outside the USA ever even heard about it.
With how loud new yorkers are, I’d be surprised if they went bragging about their pizza to Italians.
Variations on a Cloud
i don’t get why they couldn’t’ve done this in like a more somewhere else like a modern art art museum or a mall or whatever.
proofread your comments
What the fuck
Hey buddy… commas are expensive, unlike apostrophes… :)
And you get paid by the ellipsis?
*you're
Love the downvotes from oblivious peeps
She was only doing God’s work, those heathens in Dublin will never understand
There was a similar thing done as an art installation between London and New York called the Telectroscope in 2008. Apparently it was the site of a few marriage proposals.
Look how far we’ve come…
I bet some people flashed that one and such too, but I could find no indication that it was shut down because of that.
It feels like society has backslid tremendously on some freedoms in the past 15 years, particularly where it comes to prudishness.
These days we even have otherwise progressive people jumping on the prude bandwagon along with hyper religious controlling anti feminists and it just makes for such strange bedfellows.
I really don’t know why the people who set this up didn’t foresee this sort of thing happening in a link between New York and Dublin. Maybe if you want to hope this sort of thing doesn’t happen, link up Champaign, Illinois to Uppsala, Sweden.
What so Sven can walk by and see an obese man in a trucker hat double fisting Big Gulps? On second thought sure, it’d be a zoo attraction for the Swedes.
“Look at the things Americans do… and they have paid healthcare!”
“They have so many trucks but all they haul is themselves!”
Fantastic username btw
Thanks! Honestly I’ve enjoyed A LOT of the usernames I see on Lemmy, y’all out here doing it with funny and creative names
Ah yes, let’s link up a college town with a bunch of drunk kids with a complete lack of inhibition and a similar perceived lack of consequences. It will surely work great.
What a bitch, ruining it for everyone.
Different places have different laws, news at 11.
That doesn't change that what she did was a dick move.
Hilarious
I personally wouldn’t call it a “dick” move…
Meh, prudes ruined the fun. There ain’t nothing wrong with some titties
Is there a public website with the two sides of the portal viewable?
Not anymore.
Damn. Now we’ll never get to see boobs on the internet.
Greed is the most destructive human impulse, but prudishness still wins handily in the fucking annoying category.
Oh no, boobs, those things pretty much everyone likes, the horror!
The average person has one boob and one testicle.
Slightly less than one boob and one testicle. Just like the average person has slightly less than two legs.
IDK, there’s slightly more women than men, it may skew the results
and women who have had mastectomies.
That’s kinda my point. Mastectomies would bring the average down but more women brings it back up. Too lazy to Google but is global # of women who have had mastectomies more or fewer than # of “excess” women (over men)
Well are we just equalizing based on boob number, or are we also equalizing based on average boob size? Because some men also have boobs due to hormonal imbalance, and that’s even more if we decide to count like, fat induced moobs for whatever reason. The hormonal imbalances at least would probably bring the average back in favor of slightly more than one boob. If we’ve equalized it to boob size then we’d probably all have like small A cups or something.
What about fat guys? Does that up the average?
No, those are moobs.
The average person has slightly more than one skeleton inside of them
Some of us have 2 boobs and 2 testicals :)
And some have 0 boobs and 0 testicles. Gender affirming care probably evens out
Won’t someone think of the ovaries!?
I was thinking about this in terms of limbs, and wondering, since pregnant women have more than 4 limbs, wouldn’t the average number of limbs be greater than 4?
There are probably considerably more pregnant women than people missing limbs, but then again, the women only have additional limbs for 9 months.
Glad to know I’m driving that leg median up !
I dunno. My buddy Kyle has like 10 legs. 9 of them are prosthetic, but they all count.
What about stilts?
I’ll have to ask Kyle. I consider him my authority on what’s a leg.
he has a leg up on everybody else
You must be pulling my legs
That’s not true! I got two it’s just that one is really big!
You know what? That took waaaayyyy longer than I thought it would to happen.
-Gandalf
I have to wonder if people being jerks under anonymity is not because of the anonymity itself, but because of the lack of consequences.
The people messing around aren’t anonymous, but it’s not like anyone can do anything to them from that far away
I swear you lemmiers are disappointing me. No one posting source for this lady and her boobs that shutdown a trans-atlantic portal?
If this were reddit, someone might have posted source of this daring lady.
I’m will to bet 4chan has all her leaked OF stuff posted already
I braved going on to Yahoo and it says her name is Ava Louise.
My lemmgga! This is her! www.instagram.com/avalouiise?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA=…
Damn. She’s plastic. :(
Maybe people here have actually seen real boobs and not that excited about pictures of someone else’s.
Tends to happen as you grow up and get into actual relationships with women.
Get off your high horse - I’m covered in women and I still love seeing boobs (in person, digital, analog, in my dreams…)
NSNTT -never say no to tits
You know what I did see over the portal in a video a friend shared on our group chat? Someone mocking 9/11 in Dublin. Nothing upsets New Yorkers worse.
Irish have experience at banter. They had to put up with England for all eternity. Also, they’re drunk.
What kind of journalism is that? Not even a picture of those “big apples” so the reader can judge for himself.
Mmm I wish I had more hands …so I could give more thunbs down!!
Not sure what you’re talking about, but it seems to work.
She called them potatoes, not apples.
tmz seem to have come up with apples. BTW I’d prefer apples to potatoes, but that’s just me.
She said homegrown potatoes, because she was flashing people in Ireland.
The juxtaposition of reenacting this whole thing with primates would be so absurd.
This reads like a National Lampoons film. Were the Griswold’s present?
It’s New York. What did they think would happen?
Well, that was one of the instances of abuse of the portal. Another was a mooning, and yet another was a man showing NYC citizens pictures of 9/11 over the portal.
I assume they never thought that so many people would start being a punk-ass because they think the magical screen makes them safe from all persecution like the one at home. It is trained behavior.
People do this shit face to face all the time. It’s only easier to record like this. Same with the internet. It didn’t make people into assholes. It just made it easier to record.
The busy main streets of NYC and Dublin certainly have seen some great and terrible things, but these recordings were all published by nearby peers and not the company. There isn’t much incentive for breaking indecent exposure laws even with the screen, but you can’t pretend it was ever so common.
Do they think NY is censored from 9/11 like China from Tieneman Square?
Or just they think its going to bother anyone?
I think it was one of those things like “This is what happened the last time you talked shit overseas” statement. In which case, that dude might be on a no-fly list now.
Or Australia and the recent church stabbings. NZ and the Christchurch thing, plenty of counties have shit banned beside China.
I’m pretty sure that New Yorkers knows what 9/11 looks like. I think people dramatically overestimate how much Americans care about stuff like this.
Can’t blame them for thinking that, we built a monument for 2,996 people and then waged a war over it that killed 100,000, not including a lot of our own.
It’s legal to be topless in New York. She didn’t commit a crime or anything.
But not Dublin! Those catholic bastards…
I’m a catholic, but I’m just addicted to cats.
I too love drinking cathol
8 out of 10?
It’s legal to be topless in NYC as long as it’s not for “sexual reasons” (whatever that means)— so this particular case might be something of a legal debate… but I don’t see any cop bothering to arrest her for it. Shockingly, they don’t care.
She’d just argue that it’s “art” probably…
Yeah, you’d be surprised about how much that wouldn’t fly with the NYPD. I watch Matthew Silver run into the Union Sq. Whole Foods in a Speedo in a legit performance art piece.
The cops had little respect for that.
I did, tho. After he managed to escape, we met up after and smoked a spliff. Then I made it to class at Parsons.
That guy was very interesting to know while I was an undergrad at design school.
I suck at art!
Not sex, pure marketing
Do you think those two things are separate?
What year do you think this is? 1830 whatever?
? lmao
Did I mention legality? I don’t find topless necessarily rude the same way I don’t find hands to be rude, but if someone gave me the middle finger, that changes things.
Whenever I’ve been in NYC, there’s always someone desperately trying to be seen.
Oh so that is what that was… I walked by it several times
Ava Louise, for those curious. Her/her tits are… not really my thing… Like a Bratz doll with Thanksgiving turkeys stuffed into her chest.
That’s a very accurate description.
But she sure lacks attention.
You know this kinda makes me think that it would’ve been funnier if they connected two cities that hate each other more than just like, dublin and new york, which I can’t really think of as ever having had beef. Maybe NYC and chicago, or something. You can’t really put something like this in texas or LA because nobody fuckin walks anywhere, unless maybe you put it in like long beach or like some random part of Austin or something. Seattle? Does Seattle have beef with anywhere? On the other side, could we connect Dublin with like, London or something? Maybe some city in northern Ireland?
Something like outside Yankee Stadium and Fenway Park, and they’d probably be destroyed in minutes…
That’d be fuckin awesome though, imagine the chaos you could just ambiently cause, especially if you made it out of like, bulletproof glass and concrete, and maybe included some self-cleaning mechanism, or set the camera back from the glass a ways, so people couldn’t obfuscate the camera or the image. Could be the move, could be the play.
Then suddenly replace the LED screen with an actual wormhole bridge and watch the melee from afar!
Airlines hate this one weird trick
Mississippi and Bagdad
You’d just have the religious nutjobs get the thing shut down in the name of “saving the children.”
I don’t know what the Baghdad citizen would do though.
(In case this goes over people’s heads, I’m calling the Mississippians the religious nutjobs)
I fear, stones would quickly put an end to such portals.
Seattle has beef with Portland. Hippie beef. Impossible beef.
Moscow and DC. What could possibly go wrong.
The thing would be shot down in secs. OH NO COMUNISTS. Ratatata skrskr
Equally likely to be shot down by Russian soldiers for spreading “western lies”
This would be a pretty one sided fight.
Now DC to Beijing. That would be spicy.
I don’t think the average Chinese person is as rabidly nationalistic as Americans and Russians though.
Give me Tehran and Jacksonville. Miami and Havana. Nashville and Pyongyang.
Belfast and Dublin would have been nice.
Dublin and Rome
Toronto and Boston would be funny as hell LOL
Miami and San Francisco would be excellent
But make both of them out of bulletproof glass
Of course something this genuinely cool is going to be misused. Of course.
I don’t see how this is misuse, some people are just terrified of sex and nudity.
It just happened to be Ireland, one of the only super Catholic countries left.
And the US of A the future far right theocracy.
I wouldn’t say terrified. There’s these things called dignity and respect. NYC gave up on those a long time ago.
Yeah, terrified is a bit much. This guy experiences more a mix of repression and shame.
someone showed their boobs 😔 a dark day for humanity indeed
the other stuff isn’t too wild either.
👍
OH THE HUMANITY
Did you mean:
Mammality
Boobs should never shut anything down. Ever.
Its a good thing they never invented a bomb that distributed female nipples over a wide area.
Entire cities could be lost.
The United military forces of me are acutely interested in this device you describe for warfare.
But it would only work on prude countries.
France would scoff at such an attack, they have raunchier shampoo commercials. And Scandinavian countries wouldn’t even bat an eye.
Finally, a way to obliterate Utah once and for all
"OnlyFans model flashing the so-called portal. Another “very drunk" woman was filmed rubbing her behind against the screen, while a different video shows a man exposing his own derrière.
One person on the Irish side went as far as to show the New Yorkers images of 9/11 on his phone, according to The Guardian.”
Yeaaah. Not just boobs
"OnlyFans model flashing the so-called portal. Another “very drunk" woman was filmed rubbing her behind against the screen, while a different video shows a man exposing his own derrière.
One person on the Irish side went as far as to show the New Yorkers images of 9/11 on his phone, according to The Guardian.”
Yeaaah. Not just boobs
The horror of the human body. Hide it, seal it and be ashamed of it.
Well, the 9/11 wasn’t about the human body. Rubbing ass against the screen is outright unsanitary.
Definitely tasteless. But hardly the worst thing I’ve seen someone post in an online space.
<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/f1d9e194-7c4c-486a-9c6d-617e24fa2fc0.jpeg">
I might argue the root of the problem is anonymity.
I doubt it was tasteless. It probably tasted like screen
Does it really need to be sanitary?
I mean, people aren’t expected to eat off it or something are they?
But it was >20 years ago. We might as well be showing them pictures of the Troubles.
Everyone knows that if children are exposed to breasts between ages 3 and 17 they will go blind.
I literally wear clothes everyday. I’m doing my part.
Won’t somebody think of the children! Lol
i mean, the problem isn’t the portal in those cases, and i think the portal is a very cool idea – imo, the fact that these people get in the news for it is probably why they’re doing it, it’s just one way to get people’s attention by doing outrageous stuff around a new attraction
it’s nothing new, and eventually dies off, and there are probably also many events of people being nice to each other that go unreported
edit: also, yeah, showing body parts generally shouldn’t be considered that harshly imo - of you’re forcing people to look at them, they’re probably not pretty, but I wouldn’t call those “vulgaire” either
Reminds me of that scene in “The Wolf of Wall Street”.
Good times.
To be fair to the yanks, you sowed us nice boobies and we showed you our pale arses, cocaine and videos of 9/11.
This girl should not get the blame here.
when I read where they put the portal I had the exact same thought as everyone else who knows what town is like on o’connell street. why didn’t they just put it on talbot st
Or into Phoenix Park! Where peace and tranquility reside, inner city wild life
How did New York come out sounding like the wholesome part of this story?
What is more wholesome than sharing baby feeders? Who doesn’t love baby feeders?
Seriously it’s one of the few things we as humanity can all agree are nice.
I like them
Checks out
By being sober.
ish.
The US isn’t half as bad Lemmy makes it out to be.
They said New York, not the US. New York is it’s whole own little world. And it’s pretty raw.
Yeah as a non American I think a lot is it is because most of Europe ignores its problems - you’ll hear endless stuff about racism in America but very little about it In France so it feels like the US is worse but France is way way more racist, like absurdly so.
I heard that during COVID lockdowns, couples in Paris parks were left-alone if they were caucasian while the non-caucasians we beaten by the cops without any warning whatsoever.
woman
The horror if all the OF thots would’ve swarmed the portal after this incident.
Edit fixed typo
‘incident’, right?
Yeah, you’re correct.
Meanwhile, Vilnius-Lublin portal is working with no incidents.
it’s fun to wander around the old town and stumble upon the portal and see people waving at you from the other side.
Fun fact: Women being topless is not illegal in NYC.
*As long as it’s not in furtherance of a business interest.
This thing is on the Irish radio every day since they opened it. Great idea, and sounds like people are having fun.
*were having fun
Here’s the thing. If people aren’t allowed to have fun with your intercontinental portal, why even have it at all?
Also, how hasn’t anyone learned that this kind of thing is an absolute guarantee? “It’s happened countless times. But it might not this time!”
Dorks. Put that shit back up. It’s neat!
New Yorkers and Dubliners are supposed to come between breasts, not have breasts come between them.
Ava Louise, for those interested.
So clearly her plan is working
Tbf she had to take credit for it, it’s not like most OF models would be recognized in public. Hell, most internet celebrities would go relatively unnoticed in public.
I heard somewhere that only the Top 2% of OF-“models” make 80% of all the revenue and the rest hardly make enough to pay for a meal a day.
Have a friend that does it. According to her, it’s nothing to pay your bills with, but if you just want some extra cash to get yourself something nice, it works a treat.
Ava Louise, the woman who had gluteal implants and now has an ass so big that she can’t fit into regular seats or clothing. Humans are fucking weird.
i mean, it’s cool we have science to provide that to the people who want it imo
its really not. Someone like that needs mental help, not to be indulged
I don’t see what the issue is, it’s her body, she can do what she wants with it.
Its mental illness. Its not going to benifit her.
If it makes her happy and isn’t hurting anyone else why do you care?
If it makes “Hitler” happy and isn’t hurting “not-Jews” else why do you care?
These kinds of whataboutism is how bad things happen from well-intentioned but ultimately bad things end up happening.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
I don’t know why I’m bothering to feed the troll, but here goes…
Hurting “no one” and hurting “not Jews” are two very different things, you do realize?
Guy says “She’s not hurting anyone”. And your response is “Hitler wasn’t hurting anyone…except the Jews” as though that’s somehow an equivalent rebuttal? What the absolute fuck is wrong with your fucking brain?
Extreme examples bring to light why whataboutism is so prevalent. Find a better answer than “public nudity never hurt no one” … is not the correct answer.
This response is so dumb, reading it has actually managed to make me measurably stupider.
Cigarettes, Alcohol, Gambling, Porn, Birdwatching, Hiking, Video Games, Blogging, Youtubing, Racing…
Absolutely all of these things can be enjoyed, abused, and everything in between. All of them can lead to problems and/or can be part of a fulfilling and happy life.
You are approaching this with “She’s sick and she did this, disgusting” rather than “she’s sick and this is a symptom of that, what a shame”
Unless you are this harsh to people who have problems with the other things I mentioned and more, then you should evaluate why this specifically bothers you, it may speak to a preconception you have from a place of privilege.
Yes but this is obviously a mental illness. Plastic surgery can be great, but when abused like this its feeding a mental illness.
I didn’t disagree, I pointed out that you’re approaching this with contempt rather than empathy.
You’re right, but you’re not showing the world you’re right, you’re just showing the world you’re mean.
That’s fine, I doubt she considered what StupidBrotherInLaw thought anyway.
Leave it up, you cowards
Isn’t the purpose of the art piece to demonstrate the human condition across an ocean? Flashing/mooning/offensive memes, that is what humans do. This should stay up and more should be put in place. How much more culturally connected would cities in the US be linked to other UK or EU cities?
“humans ruin everything” yea that the point and art
Why stop at EU? We should have these everywhere and have them change locations randomly every day
Def not a bad idea, the more cities around the world the better. I also like the idea of sister cities, if they were to stick to a single portal to portal connection. I’m in Minneapolis, maybe match it with a similarly sized city across the pond. Could root for each others sports teams, offer support in trying times, develop a digital bond.
Yeah a lot of towns in Europe are ‘twinned’ with another European town - i always assume its just an excuse for the councilor to get free holidays when making the agreement but your idea makes it sound really interesting, a portal could be really cool.
The biggest problem in Europe in the past was the constant war between the nations, Germany and France in particular. How do You reduce the willingness to go fight each other. You create connections.
Economic connections in the form of the coal and steel alliance, which evolved to become the EU.
Personal connections by connecting the people between the countries with multinational friendship. Twin cities are one tool creating the friendship. By having regular exchanges between students and adults. You don’t want to go to war with a friend you visited every summer. That’s also the reason for the Erasmus program, where you can have an exchange semester at university.
All of those were implemented since the WW2 and they seem to work. There hasn’t ever been a period of such a long peace in central Europe.
City “twinning” goes beyond the EU. And it can happen for all kinds of reasons. My favourite example is the towns of Dull, Scotland, Boring, Oregon and Bland, New South Wales.
Imagine some dude would have pulled out his dick instead, what do you think the reaction would have been?
That’s not the same thing. What would be the same is if some dude pulled his shirt up to show his bare chest. What do you think the reaction would have been in that case?
Look, you might be technically correct but I’m sure you’re old enough to understand the difference between a guy’s chest a pair of boobs so I’m just gonna leave it here.
I’m sure a lot of people enjoyed the display but what about those who didn’t ask for it?
But, everyone loves boobs. Not everyone loves dick. Flashing a dick is often interpreted as aggressive. Tits, not so much. Everyone has put boobs in their mouth and liked it at one point during their lives. A good chunk of people have never sucked a dick (or want to).
We all love boobs. They kept most of us alive when we were little and they’re fun as fuck when we’re older. Most people are behind the “free the nipple” thing. Why you trying to see less boobs? The world is already such a dark place without less boobs.
More boobs, I say. Boobs everywhere. Boobs for everyone. Boobs could bring the world together. And then, we could finally heal.
Yes, everyone loves boobs but not every loves seeing them in public without any warning. First of all, there could be children present in this setting, and second, sex addiction is a thing and flashing boobs to someone struggling with it is kinda like forcing a recovering alcholic to take a shot.
They’re literally for children by definition. Much of the world has no issue with boobs.
For TODDLERS. Holy hell, if you’re trying to have an argument, at least don’t make an elementary category mistake. And also don’t just ignore the other half of my argument because it’s inconvenient to your defense.
You are either a troll or very ignorant. Not everyone loves boobs, the same way as everyone has shit themselves countless times as a baby and liked it(You can literally see the joy on a baby’s face right after they relieve themselves), but that does not mean that it is an enjoyable thing for every grownup out there.
Depends if they’re just flopping it flaccidly from side to side or angrily masturbating. Same goes for if a woman were to start rubbing one off. Nudity isn’t sexual, but what you do with it could be.
I’m not entirely sure what the going MO is for male exhibitionists because I have never felt the desire to engage in that sort of behavior, but I’m fairly sure even a floppy dong is probably enough to catch you a charge in most parts of the country.
And do we know if the lady in the OP simply pulled her tatas out to get them some fresh air or whether she wiggled and bounced them suggestively? I didn’t watch the video so I don’t want to make any assumptions, but the stills I’ve seen seem to suggest there was quite a bit of enthusiasm at work.
Why not just leave it be, no-one is being hurt
I’ll bet her paying simps are really mad that they didn’t get a free show. Anybody who pays for porn is a sucker and an idiot lol
Anyone that pays for whatever your job is shouldn’t do it either
Honestly shes not all that.
I’m sure this was killed by bitchy socially conservative sheltering types who freak out about anything that doesn’t fit in their small minded view of morality.
Lemmy is full of those people too, there’s a whole thread of them angry that openI might allow NSFW content.
God forbid people have concerns about ethics.
No one forces you to stare at the girl. People see offensive shit every day all over, but society doesn’t conform to all offenses equally, does it? Why is your ethics enforceable, but other people’s aren’t? Why does she have less right to practice her ethical choice to expose her body (assuming by your answer you would have offense)? Why is it more ethical to have others right to view taken away than for you to simply turn your head away? Ethics is very subjective, especially when there is no direct harm to either party.
Are we talking about the same thing? I replied to someone taking about OpenAI, not porn in general. The creation of porn without the consent of the people fed into the program is nothing short of an ethical nightmare, even in cases where said people are pornstars. You’re painting me as a repressive for shit I didn’t even say.
It looks like you were responding to my comment
“I’m sure this was killed by bitchy socially conservative sheltering types who freak out about anything that doesn’t fit in their small minded view of morality.”
That’s how it showed up. If you were responding to a different comment, my bad, please disregard my comment. Sometimes the line system in Lemmy is a tad hard to follow.
Edit: realize I misread the line scheme and you weren’t responding to me. Sorry.
It is against the law. That means that society, as a whole, has decided that this is immoral.
So that means that its morally okay to kill everyone who looks at me (“No one forces then to look at me!”)?
Because ethics are only enforcable through laws and the laws currently enforce “my” ethics in that regard.
Whether that is morally right is an ethical question but would you say the same about a minor (exposing themselves)?
Exactly, so what is the issue with the company having moral concerns about it and shutting it down?
Because seeing a nipple is on par with murder. Not to mention society makes all sorts of terrible shit ethical, like billionaires bribing politicians to subvert the will of the people. My point was ethics is a subjective defense at best. Especially when no harm is perpetrated on either party and nipples being required to be covered was not an ethical standard most of human history. Murder would cause harm to the murdered party. Nipple viewing would only harm a child because they have been taught that nipples are “supposed” to be hidden like a dirty secret. Even though all mammals suckle from them in early life. It’s absolutely silly to make a bare chest being exposed such a big “ethical” deal and people should be questioning this like I did. It only exists due to the puritanical religious idealism pushed on society. It has no basis in reality as a detriment to society.
One question: Would you say the same about getting completely naked in public?
Oh, they must remember the threads discussing finding child pornography in the image generation model training data.
Doesn’t necessarily have to do with conservatism. Not everyone wants to be randomly flashed without consent.
Oh the terrors of non-consensual nipples entering your line of sight. The beach must be horrifying for you, unless only women’s nipples require “consent” to be exposed. Social conservatism is the entire reason breasts have to be hidden like dirty sexualized secrets to begin with. It’s silly.
You do not have my consent to display your eyebrows today.
Yes a fair comparison.
Seems like you grew up in a very puritanical place.
Nudity is objectively neutral.
I think the shutting down after such “incidents” is the final expression in this piece of art.
“A connected world is great, as long as that connection includes approved messages only.”
And your owners will approve.
Also let’s all live cramped up together in cities! Except for the owners who live in far off places. Cities make it easier to use you all in a convenient place. Plus it reduces traffic in the freeways. Traffic reduces the flow of goods which is how your owners can extract money from your labor at the end of the day. So get off the freeway, be at work on time, live in the city. Oh if you want to travel we have a convenient tram and bus. You can pay your owners to travel!
What an asinine take. I choose to live in a city because I can meet many different friends in many different interesting spots, where we can e.g. eat excellent iterations of different cuisines.
All without sitting my ass in a car and driving for an hour to meet a single couple that lives in some other hamlet. Or having to plan the exact amount of drinks and food to consume before the evening starts. And I can do that multiple times per week if I please.
You like living in the countryside, I get it. Don’t pretend that’s somehow objectively better lol
Well I didn’t start my comment insulting the commenter.
When you think about city vs country living: 1) there’s not enough space, some/most people have to live in people storage systems like cities. 2) cities do not produce anything. They consume. Cities do not produce fruit, fish, meat or their vegan counterparts. Cities do not produce minerals needed for even the most basic processes. Cities do not produce any of the basic human needs such as shelter, food, water, clothing. All of those things come from agriculture, mining, fishing, manufacturing etc of the raw materials which cities do not produce and do not want to produce. 3) cities do not produce energy. Rather cities use up energy and lots of it. There’s no significant production of energy of any form coming from cities. No oil, wind, solar, hydro, thermal energy at all.
All of these things are produced away from cities for the purpose of actually being able to do it. You can’t go drilling for oil in the middle of times square or downtown Chicago. You can’t fish where there’s no water.
What cities do produce is trash. Millions and millions of cubic miles of trash all together. Along with sewage raw contaminated water. Those two things are the 100% product of cities. Cities sometimes produce processed products and also have education centers. Usually cities are were local jails are as well as population control systems such as government offices, testing clinics, hospitals, people furnaces etc. None of these things made in cities would be possible without what is made out in the country side. Think of anything made in your city and chase the raw product and you will realize that cities are people storages because they depend on the means of production of the countryside. And cities are always fighting to remove anything that is “dirty” … Usually dirty is the original reason the city was crated. For example a saw mill. I live in a city who’s name comes from a saw mill and has no such thing today. Or it could be industrial processes such a pig and cow and chicken murdering companies, plastic or oil production etc. Somehow a guy or gal found a cheap piece of land, started a business gathered people and bam a city is founded. Then later they make legislation that bans the industry and you are left with a city that produces nothing and still needs that product they used to produce.
Notice that I did not insult you personally in my description of the difference between cities and country. Notice also that it’s actually very hard to come up with things that a city makes which are tangible things that do not depend on the outside.
For those reasons cities are people storage units.
But you did insult. You asserted that living in a city isn’t a voluntary choice, therefore taking agency away from people who choose to live in a city.
You’re both pivoting (now you’re suddenly talking about production) and wrong. Cities produce cross pollination between minds. Art, science, philosophy. Cities are where the ideas for photovoltaics were seeded and developed. Cities are where most music genres emerged.
We live in a world where currently, the most popular alternative to city living is being a narrow-minded redneck who holds their gas guzzler as the ultimate expression of freedom. Anarchist communes in the countryside might be part of the solution, but I bet you that what’s going on in and around the city will also play a vital role.
Were you not aware the auto and oil lobbies you’re paying to get stuck in traffic for 20 minutes to get to a place a mile away are a huge portion of the capitalists who own our politicians?
Yes, our owners are everywhere. They get to choose where to live whereas the rest of us either live stuck in a city or cannot afford living in one so we live on the outskirts closers to industrial locations.
Here we are! Some people get this! Well said!
Seriously and it’s a hot topic so it’s going to get this sort of attention.
Let it sit for a while and it’ll become normalized and these sort of antics will die off.
Just let people express themselves as long as it’s not dangerous holy crap.
“Model”
Sometimes I wish I was born as a merino wool farmer in 13 century Spain
…and you’ve been recruited into the Crusades. God speed holly warrior, may you strike the infidels down.
Why does there always have to be that small group of people who ruin the fun for everyone else?
You are talking about the people that shut it down; not the flashers. Let people be people. That’s how we are; accept it.
Seriously somebody showing their nipples, even if they are female nipples doesn’t actually ruin anything for anyone ever.
It is just people ruining it for everyone by having a moral panic about nipples.
That’s what I was saying. Even though flashing is kinda rude, I was talking about the people who shut it down.
I mean, he just showed 9/11 images, but flashing??? Wtf women!
Best…episode…of Stargate…ever…
Fucking savage.