Venice has had enough: Local elections will decide the city’s direction on tourism (english.elpais.com)
from Wudi@feddit.uk to world@lemmy.world on 26 May 07:38
https://feddit.uk/post/49718792

#world

threaded - newest

ms_lane@lemmy.world on 26 May 07:53 next collapse

I hope they can reinvent themselves, but what industry does Venice even have outside petrochemical refineries on the mainland?

flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz on 26 May 08:49 next collapse

I don’t think it will ever completely remove tourism, but the current approach is going to ruin the tourist industry too.
There’s nothing left in the old city any more, it’s all tourism. And who’s going to come to visit a bunch of overpriced souvenir shops on an island?

psx_crab@lemmy.zip on 26 May 09:30 next collapse

Do note that the city is sinking due to how and where they build the whole city, and tourism is accelerating the demise of it. So overtourism will kill the city one way or another.

fizzle@quokk.au on 26 May 12:02 collapse

For some tourists that is exactly the objective.

newton@feddit.online on 26 May 10:10 collapse

Glass

Admetus@sopuli.xyz on 26 May 08:17 next collapse

It needs restricted flows and entry tax which contributes to say…reducing the burden on existing tourism businesses when they take a hit from low sales. Been there before, it’s way too busy and lacks the romance of old.

Windex007@lemmy.world on 26 May 17:07 next collapse

I imagine a large group of very wealthy people would be very in favour of a steep entry tax.

Flower@sh.itjust.works on 26 May 17:20 collapse

It’s moving like that in more places. The result is tourism for the rich. Everybody likes fewer visitors if they’re large spenders.

k0e3@lemmy.ca on 26 May 08:31 collapse

Okinawa should take notes but they won’t.