'Unprecedented Mass Deployment' of Warplanes Across Atlantic Fuels Fears of US War on Iran | Common Dreams (www.commondreams.org)
from pete_link@lemmy.ml to world@lemmy.world on 16 Jun 23:43
https://lemmy.ml/post/31803359

Brett Wilkins Jun 16, 2025

Flight-tracking websites showed dozens of Air Force aerial refueling planes departing from military bases in the United States and heading to Europe on Sunday, fueling speculation of direct U.S. involvement in the widening Israeli-Iranian war.

Military-focused news sites reported that around 30 U.S. Air Force KC-135R and KC-46A tankers were identified by flight-tracking software in what The Times of Israelcalled an “unprecedented mass deployment” to Europe.

#world

threaded - newest

AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today on 16 Jun 23:52 next collapse

So much for keeping the US out of war…

gdog05@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 00:03 next collapse

I can’t believe he’d just… Lie to us like we’re a court, Congress or himself or something.

Placebonickname@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 01:24 collapse

I noticed you didn’t say anything about a wife/ex-wife

whostosay@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 03:53 collapse

We don’t have to lie to those, we just put those into our golf courses ya ijit

flandish@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 00:08 next collapse

There has never been a decade in the entire history of the US in which it has not been at war. Come to think of it, there are probably like 10 years total, over 250, where there was not direct military action. I think. Have not recently checked the spreadsheet I keep.

Slowy@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 00:11 next collapse

Machines gotta eat

flandish@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 00:11 collapse

And shareholders gotta profit.

Crankenstein@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 02:07 collapse

There is no “and”. The shareholders are the machine.

can@sh.itjust.works on 17 Jun 00:39 next collapse

Something like 17 years total.

That means that for 222 out of 239 years – or 93% of the time – America has been at war. (We can quibble with the exact numbers, but the high percentage of time that America has been at war is clear and unmistakable.)

Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 02:03 collapse

Yes we are a shithole country

known_unknown@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 02:05 next collapse

Slowing weapons production??? While there are still citizens to vaporize to manufacture consent for yet more war???

scarabic@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 03:21 collapse

Trump wants to try for an illegal third term and he thinks that being in the middle of a war will help his chances. “Don’t change horses mid-stream” or whatever bullshit.

stebo02@sopuli.xyz on 18 Jun 13:26 collapse

i mean that’s definitely what’s keeping netanyahu in power, and what makes him want to keep all of their wars going

so if it works for netanyahu it will work for trump

TootSweet@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 00:12 next collapse

<img alt="Ah shit here we go again." src="https://velikeprice.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/ah-shit-here-we-go-again-ah-shit-02.gif">

tisktisk@piefed.social on 17 Jun 00:30 collapse

Is this san andreas?

TootSweet@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 00:33 collapse

Yup, that’s right. The scene in GTA San Andreas there has become a viral meme to express… well… “ah shit, here we go again.”

Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 00:22 next collapse

God I hate Republicans.

Trump is absolute garbage on every single scale and stat, but it’s the republican voters who got us here. Fuck every republican voter.

kingofras@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 00:49 next collapse

Hate is not going to get you anywhere.

Yes some of them voted for him but a bunch of them didn’t.

Stop being defeatist… inform yourself… look at the numbers. Look at the evidence. Get active.

If you’ve wondered why everything looks like a coup since he got in, perhaps it is because it is one.

lemmy.world/post/31401705

youtu.be/AaKFx5rxdmA

smartelections.us

electiontruthalliance.org

Edit: the upvote/downvote ratio on a comment like this shows how rapidly Lemmy is turning into Reddit. Nobody cares about the data, if you remotely sound like defending the GOP down the chute you go.

It’s your loss America. I’ll sleep fine as long as we don’t have electronic voting systems here.

knightly@pawb.social on 17 Jun 02:49 next collapse

Spite can be a powerful motivator.

BassTurd@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 03:19 next collapse

It’s not that we don’t agree with you, it’s that your kinda acting like a dick. Change your tone and you might get a better reception.

catloaf@lemm.ee on 17 Jun 04:04 next collapse

And leading with “hate is not going to get you anywhere” and following it with more blame instead of action.

Find your local mutual aid group. Volunteer. Protest. Get involved.

victorz@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 06:24 collapse

following it with more blame instead of action.

I don’t see blame anywhere?

victorz@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 06:21 collapse

[you’re] kinda acting like a dick

I really don’t see it. I see only advice trying to help them get a healthier point of view. 🤷‍♂️

Change your tone and you might get a better reception.

This has literally the same vibe.

BassTurd@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 13:28 collapse

Edit: didn’t realize the response was a different user.

I’m not trying to convince anyone of something. I’m just telling why you’re they are being downvoted, and it’s not because of the content of your their post. I’d post differently if I were trying to make a sincere point.

victorz@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 14:52 collapse

I’m not the one who made the “dick” comment…

I’m not trying to convince anyone of something.

You’re saying they should change their tone. 🤷‍♂️ Meh. Whatever you say.

[deleted] on 17 Jun 14:54 next collapse
.
victorz@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 14:59 collapse

Hahaha WHAT? You’re a liar for saying I’m a sexist and for saying I said those things in DMs. Post whatever evidence you want, you asshole. I dare you.

Do you also go around saying men raped you when they didn’t?

God, I was hoping I wouldn’t run into people like this here on Lemmy. I thought Lemmy would be different.

At least it took over a year or two until I ran into one again. That’s to Lemmy’s credit.

BassTurd@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 23:23 collapse

Apologies, I didn’t realize that you weren’t the person that I originally responded to.

I’m not trying to convince them. I don’t give a fuck if they change their tone. I was only telling them why the post wasn’t well received.

victorz@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 23:48 collapse

Right, fair enough I guess. I just can’t see where exactly the dickishness lies. I don’t see a “tone” anywhere.

BassTurd@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 23:54 collapse

As a whole it sounds like a, “you’re wrong, educate yourself, there’s only one way out of this”. I did intentionally say “kinda like a dick”, because it wasn’t super harsh, just enough off putting.

The edits were the icing that put everyone else off.

victorz@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 23:59 collapse

I’ve reread the comment and its edit now numerous times to try and find the tone. To me, they just sound motivational, seriously. Like, “go look at the facts 👏🧠, don’t be defeatist! 💪 Letsfuckinggooo”. Maybe I have the completely wrong vibe. I don’t know.

BassTurd@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 00:16 collapse

Two sides to every coin.

InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 03:56 collapse

Edit: the upvote/downvote ratio on a comment like this shows how rapidly Lemmy is turning into Reddit. Nobody cares about the data, if you remotely sound like defending the GOP down the chute you go.

Many people just aren’t serious enough to take actions that are material beneficial. We want leftist ideas, but no one wants to form a party or vote for one.

BrainInABox@lemmy.ml on 17 Jun 06:54 next collapse

Let’s not pretend that the Democrats wouldn’t also side with Israel

Akasazh@feddit.nl on 17 Jun 10:10 next collapse

Not if the democrats keep electing the same type of candidate. The trouble began when they shoehorned in Hilary, would Bernie have ran in 2016 the world would be a better place.

BrainInABox@lemmy.ml on 17 Jun 10:22 collapse

Venture?

Akasazh@feddit.nl on 17 Jun 10:29 collapse

Bernie, autocorrected

BrainInABox@lemmy.ml on 17 Jun 10:33 collapse

Ah ok. Lol, for a moment I thought you might have meant Jessie Ventura

Akasazh@feddit.nl on 17 Jun 10:38 collapse

Lol. Whilst that would not have solved many problems. In retrospect I would’ve preferred that timeline.

BrainInABox@lemmy.ml on 17 Jun 14:19 collapse

Yeah, would still probably be an improvement on this one.

[deleted] on 17 Jun 11:42 collapse
.
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz on 17 Jun 18:04 next collapse

What got us here is the same two parties cycling in power for a century. If you believe war is red fault alone and that voting blue will change anything, you are part of the problem.

selokichtli@lemmy.ml on 17 Jun 21:56 next collapse

It’s really Democrats and independents who got you there. Unconvinced ones, though. Republicans did what they do, just enough Democrats and independents stayed at home.

WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca on 18 Jun 09:44 collapse

If they feel safe leaving their homes, you’ve failed.

tisktisk@piefed.social on 17 Jun 00:31 next collapse

If anyone has good reasons to think otherwise, my anxiety needs something to believe in rn

pheonixdown@sh.itjust.works on 17 Jun 00:58 next collapse

Surprise attack on Ukraine?

tisktisk@piefed.social on 17 Jun 01:13 collapse

you are making it worse somehow
(But I did laugh at the absurdity of it all, so thank you)

iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org on 17 Jun 01:18 collapse

Lol same reaction. I don’t think it’s too absurd, sadly 😔

Today@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 01:34 collapse

Chuckle… Oh shit!

Gsus4@mander.xyz on 17 Jun 02:05 next collapse

Well, you’re dependent on tramp’s judgement at this point (panik)…on the one hand his caveman brain knows “oil price spike bad” and he can say no to bibi (kalm)…but he’s an idiot and easy to manipulate, so maybe he’ll fuck that up too (panik).

match@pawb.social on 17 Jun 03:55 collapse

Oil price spike is actually very profitable for oil company and bad for not oil company

decipher_jeanne@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 17 Jun 07:28 collapse

Realistically it would be a normal thing to build up forces in the area to monitor and contain the conflict in case of further escalation by either party. Especially with Iranian proxy liable to strike at international shipping in the red sea and straight of Hormuz.

So this could just be a nothing burger. I hope.

Edit: okay yeah. No. 🍊 Is absolutely involving the military in there.

BrainInABox@lemmy.ml on 17 Jun 15:47 collapse

That doesn’t’ really seem plausible based on the scale of the deployment.

SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de on 17 Jun 01:09 next collapse

Watching globe.adsbexchange.com and filtering by military-only is fun.

C17s flying back and forth between Ramstein and Israel for a couple hours already (not sure how many normally do, tbf. could be normal)

[deleted] on 17 Jun 01:16 next collapse
.
wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 17 Jun 01:16 collapse

Cool website. I’m not seeing shit for military flights in the ME. I wonder if they all went dark or if I am not filtering correctly.

SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de on 17 Jun 01:29 collapse

it’s not a lot, but quite a constant flow (mainly C17) for at least a couple hours.

<img alt="" src="https://discuss.tchncs.de/pictrs/image/e6b5516d-96bd-4ed8-a5c9-5905e999b4f7.png">

Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social on 17 Jun 01:13 next collapse

Are people surprised? Republicans are war hawks even more so than the Libs.

InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 01:27 next collapse

You’d be surprised. There are quite a few on lemmy that still do the both sides are the same. Oddly trying to do anything to form a new progressive is also something they don’t seem interested in either.

Tinidril@midwest.social on 17 Jun 01:47 next collapse

Biden ran on getting back into the deal with Iran, then insisted that Iran must completely return to fulfilling their side of the deal before we would consider returning to ours.

Both sides are not the same but Biden shouldn’t be let off the hook for his sudden flip on this issue.

InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 02:05 next collapse

Its one thing to be unhappy with the democrats. Its another (and self defeating) to not want to expand the progressive wing inside of it (or to form a new party and go for local elections) and to not stall alt right republicans everywhere else.

Tinidril@midwest.social on 17 Jun 02:40 collapse

Absolutely, I just don’t think it actually helps Democrats in the long run to pave over their often deep flaws. If we were harder on Democrats 30 years ago, we probably wouldn’t have Trump today.

prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 17 Jun 11:46 collapse

Nobody is paving over anything, you just cannot help yourself but shit on theoretical shit that Biden didn’t even fucking do yet.

Tinidril@midwest.social on 17 Jun 12:18 collapse

Biden didn’t even fucking do yet.

Yet? I’m not sure how to argue with someone who thinks Biden is still president. It doesn’t seem worthwhile.

prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 17 Jun 11:45 collapse

Both sides are the same because Biden said something that suggested he might be hard on Iran (definitely couldn’t be a negotiating tactic)?

Yes I know how you ended your comment, I was replying to the rest of it.

Tinidril@midwest.social on 17 Jun 12:02 collapse

(definitely couldn’t be a negotiating tactic)?

No, it definitely wasn’t a “negotiation tactic”. It was meant to avoid negotiating without Biden’s adoring masses noticing that he did a 180. He caved to AIPAC, as he would continue to do throughout his term.

Why the hell would Iran go back to fulfilling it’s obligations under the agreement when the US was still ignoring it’s obligations? Why would it bother negotiating with a country that doesn’t honor negotiated agreements? Everyone in the foreign policy space knew exactly what it was.

Yes I know how you ended your comment,

Then why the fuck did you haul out “both sides”? Why are so many people desperate to throw everything into that frame?

Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 02:06 collapse

Yeah when liberals kill a wedding party or hospital at least they act sad.

InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 02:17 collapse

Oddly trying to do anything to form a new progressive is also something they don’t seem interested in either.

Its okay to not like liberals, but that part of my original comment is important.

Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 02:26 collapse

I read that and it made me sad because that will literally never happen in my potential grandchildren’s lifetimes

InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 02:40 collapse

Same, but

A society grows great when old men plant trees in whose shade they know they shall never sit.

We still need to get the ball rolling. The institutions and networks we need will take a lot of time to build. I know a lot of our fellow lefties don’t want to interact with anything government, but doing so with the goals of harm reduction gives us space to lay the roots and set up the next generation for success. If we are serious about things we need follow ups for our protests and making the best efforts we can in our sub-ideal situations.

Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 02:47 collapse

I would rather build a real, actual house for people than a system of oppression built on violence.

And before you say “habitat for humanity Jimmy Carter “ it’s the same catty bureaucracy I’ve found everywhere.

InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 02:53 collapse

I would rather build a real, actual house for people than a system of oppression built on violence.

And that does not happen overnight, if you don’t follow up protests, and some voting.

Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 03:26 collapse

Bitch I’ve been voting for a quarter fucking century.

I protested the fucking Iraq war II and it still fucking happened.

Keep telling me this bullshit actually works like I’m some fucking eighteen year old.

Democracy is broken

InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 03:35 next collapse

And we need more people to join us

prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 17 Jun 11:48 collapse

I think some of the people here are literal children… At least I hope so with how naive and clueless about history they are.

Gsus4@mander.xyz on 17 Jun 01:29 next collapse

But only against countries that pose no threat to them i.e. they are chickenhawks. At least Biden could do the bare minimum to help Ukraine.

Crankenstein@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 02:19 next collapse

They are jingoists, and jingoists are no different than schoolyard bullies who want to appear tough so they loudly proclaim how tough and big they are, which includes an occasional show of force against those they believe won’t/can’t defend themselves to reinforce their image of being the biggest Tough Guy™ around.

If they win, they win. If they lose, it’s because they decided it wasn’t worth their time and left willingly, not because they lost.

This country has always been stuck up its own ass.

[deleted] on 17 Jun 02:23 collapse
.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml on 17 Jun 06:57 collapse

And considerably more than the bare minimum to help Israel

BingoBongoBang@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 06:09 collapse

Dude, USA is the country that is involved in most wars - starts them / finances them / whatever. And they usually find a dummy excuse to preserve their facade of doing good.

Face the truth - you are the bully of the world and the ruling party does not matter.

Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social on 17 Jun 07:31 next collapse

Was I ever in denial that the USA likes to play bully and world police? Let’s not forget our history about the rest of the Western nations, they’re hardly angels themselves. We’re all the same people anyways. Actually that reminds me of a good ole George Carlin quote, “We come from that northern European, basically the northern European genes, the blue eyes. Those blue eyes. Boy everybody in the world learned real quick, didn’t they? When those blue eyes sail out of the north, you better nail everything down motherfucker.”

BingoBongoBang@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 08:20 collapse

Agreed. I wanted just to emphasize that the party does not make much of a difference in regards to wars.

prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 17 Jun 11:43 collapse

Who are you even replying to

Kolanaki@pawb.social on 17 Jun 01:15 next collapse

Flight-tracking websites showed dozens of Air Force aerial refueling planes departing from military bases in the United States and heading to Europe on Sunday, fueling speculation of direct U.S. involvement in the widening Israeli-Iranian war.

Oh good. They’re just fueling speculation and not any war machines. ^/s^

altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 17 Jun 01:32 next collapse

Air sharks at a smell of a big conflict in the ME.

pmk@lemmy.sdf.org on 17 Jun 04:57 collapse

Are these american military bases useful for europe anymore? Do we need them? I always thought they were a nato thing, but nowadays I don’t know. If europe is alone against the russians anyway and we cant count on nato, maybe we should just tell the american military to leave europe?

graycube@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 01:38 next collapse

This will drive oil prices up.

Today@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 02:02 collapse

This will give the oil companies a reason to …

EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com on 17 Jun 02:00 next collapse

We just want fucking healthcare and affordable housing.

SupraMario@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 02:52 next collapse

Best the turnip can do is a gold colored overpriced shit phone.

kautau@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 03:32 collapse

Not to worry, it’s made in china, shipped from china, and then people in detention centers will be forced by ICE to package it for that bonus fascism feel for those that believe it’s made in the US and and they’re getting a deal on the T-Mobile package that costs almost 2x other providers for the same service.

Asafum@feddit.nl on 17 Jun 03:22 next collapse

Sorry, best I can do is 2 trillion more for Boeing, Raytheon, Lockheed Martin and the like. They’re desperate man, they haven’t had a war for like 12 minutes, they need to be fed.

Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee on 17 Jun 09:13 next collapse

Zomg, Boeing planes being flown above enemy territory as surprise kamikazes (surprise to the pilots & crew).

SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca on 19 Jun 01:56 collapse

Lockheed Martin did October 7?

Basically 9/11 truther style conspiracy nonsense going on here.

Asafum@feddit.nl on 19 Jun 03:25 collapse

What?

It was a joke about how we have no money to spend on healthcare for the population, but we always jump to throw endless cash at defense contractors to supply the military…

SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca on 20 Jun 01:46 collapse

Haha… good joke. I didn’t see your mention of healthcare in your previous comment.

It’s typical of conspiracy theorists to say “it was just a joke” when called out on their bullshit. You may go back to doing “your own research in the internet” now.

Asafum@feddit.nl on 20 Jun 03:07 collapse

You have no idea what you’re talking about. Enjoy your weekend.

AA5B@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 04:08 next collapse

And human rights. Due process. Rule of law and respect the constitution. Less inflation. More progress on our environment. Rebuild some infrastructure. Invest in some technologies of the future rather than the past. Leadership that understands basic economics and actually the art of the deal

ohulancutash@feddit.uk on 17 Jun 05:32 next collapse

You don’t, because almost none of you vote for socialist candidates.

Corn@lemmy.ml on 17 Jun 05:49 next collapse

The media told them Hillary is the most qualified candidate in history only Biden can beat Trump, because he appeals to moderates, where things like free healthcare and not locking immigrants in cages only appeals to far left loonies.

The average American wants these things, its just we cant risk the Republicans winning so we have to run on the republican platform from 4 years ago.

Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee on 17 Jun 09:10 collapse

None of which are socialist.

They are all systematically weaved out of the closed, private two-party system.

kayky@thelemmy.club on 17 Jun 09:20 collapse

This is the truth.

Americans have shown where their priorities lie, time and time again.

venusaur@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 05:51 next collapse

Don’t worry. You’ll get it if you can be drafted.

hydroptic@sopuli.xyz on 17 Jun 09:02 next collapse

But don’t expect any medical treatment if you’re a Democrat or unmarried: ‘Extremely disturbing and unethical’: new rules allow VA doctors to refuse to treat Democrats, unmarried veterans

rumimevlevi@lemmings.world on 17 Jun 13:56 collapse

They deserve medical treatment but what service destroying other countries?

hydroptic@sopuli.xyz on 17 Jun 15:28 collapse

The hell did you want me to call it then? “Military service” is a completely common expression to use, and it applies whether we like what they’re doing or not.

And before you get any bright ideas: no, I’m not American and no, I don’t support what their military does. This kind of completely pointless semantic wankery just really activates my almonds

Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee on 17 Jun 09:09 collapse

And it will last you till your death (several days later).

l_isqof@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 07:31 next collapse

You had a chance at that in Zuck’s metaverse…

kent_eh@lemmy.ca on 17 Jun 16:05 next collapse

We just want fucking healthcare and affordable housing.

Trumps response is to offer army barracks and MREs, in exchange for you becoming cannon fodder in his delusional war games.

HistoryPug@lemmy.ml on 17 Jun 19:23 next collapse

Best we can do is give more people PTSD and then deny them disability or treatment for it. America loves dead soldiers, we can’t go too long without having a new batch.

selokichtli@lemmy.ml on 17 Jun 21:52 next collapse

Other Americans just want fucking guns and affordable discrimination. It’s a sad day.

boughtmysoul@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 03:07 next collapse

Best I can do is a Trump smartphone.

LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee on 18 Jun 10:02 next collapse

Yeah. Unfortunately it’s been obvious to a lot of us for awhile that it would only come from the ashes of this country.

FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 11:33 collapse

Be that as it may, we also only seem to vote for people that we know aren’t going to actually do what they say, except on the issue of immigration.

graycube@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 02:05 next collapse

Maybe they are invading Greenland. Or it is a ruse and they are invading Canada.

TwinTitans@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 02:16 collapse

“How to start WW3 in 10 seconds”.

match@pawb.social on 17 Jun 04:03 collapse

“How to lose WW3 in a day”

mctoasterson@reddthat.com on 17 Jun 02:09 next collapse

Armchair theory is that the US large platform bombers will be used to credibly threaten repeated bunker buster hits on Fordow nuclear site. This could pressure Iran to surrender its entire nuclear program including that site.

Currently Israel doesn’t have the capability by itself to destroy the site but US bombers possibly could.

midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 17 Jun 18:03 collapse

That doesn’t make a lick of sense. To use an analogy, that would be like eating lunch with me and I say “I’m going to take your apple,” so you’re response is to give me your whole lunch, including the apple.

midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 17 Jun 18:06 next collapse

I mean, it’s actually much worse than that, because in this case losing your lunch means losing your best chance to defend yourself and opening yourself to future attacks, maybe on breakfast and dinner.

mctoasterson@reddthat.com on 17 Jun 18:57 collapse

I explained it poorly but the other half of the threat is “we have complete air superiority so we can strike your leadership itself any time they stick their heads out of their bunkers” or “we can destroy your oil fields and tank your economy at any point” etc.

Iran has very few chips left to play with considering they have zero air defenses at the moment. I predict they will be forced to surrender their entire nuclear program or they will face a decapitation attack and destruction of their entire refinement capability and military apparatus.

xenomor@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 02:14 next collapse

I’d just like to take this opportunity to say “fuck you” to all the service people flying these planes, planning the logistics, and otherwise operating at the behest of our sadistic federal government. Sure, the civilian leadership is ultimately at fault here, but y’all are humans with agency. I’m no longer carving out culpability from these goddamn people anymore. Fuck you terrorists. If we escalate yet another war, I’ll plan to spit on you when you arrive back broken and dead. Bring on the downvotes.

chunes@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 02:50 next collapse

How hard is it to just not kill others?

Apparently really fucking hard for some.

scarabic@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 03:24 next collapse

It’s been decades that our military has been nothing but an imperialist boot. There is no moral ground to stand on in signing up. Work fast food.

ohulancutash@feddit.uk on 17 Jun 05:36 next collapse

Always. Even the continental army was set up to facilitate and enable genocide.

Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee on 17 Jun 09:07 next collapse

Decades implies that it once (in USAs history) wasn’t so, which is false. The rest of it if very true tho.

scarabic@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 17:09 collapse

I’m being generous. I mean the revolutionary and civil wars weren’t exactly imperialism. But you’re right there are older examples to be sure. Like what we did to Mexico.

SelfHigh5@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 10:18 next collapse

But fast food won’t guarantee housing or healthcare. Military recruitment preys on those with nowhere else to go.

scarabic@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 17:07 collapse

“Housing.” As in a cot to sleep on? You can get the same at a homeless shelter or by landing yourself in jail.

“Healthcare.” Hm yes the military has a great reputation for taking care of the folks maimed in the line of duty after they’ve sent them into harm’s way. Don’t join the army for your health, y’all!

SelfHigh5@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 17:43 collapse

No like, base housing, or a housing allowance. As for healthcare I see your point and yes that’s a travesty. But my daughter was born in a hospital and I paid zero dollars for prenatal care and her birth. So. That’s what I meant.

scarabic@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 23:34 collapse

Now we’re saying that it’s ethical to join the military because they’ll pay for you to have a baby. Is that really a serious argument?

SelfHigh5@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 10:48 collapse

None of this was meant as an argument to join up, just stating facts in relation to my experience, and how the logic could folllow for some in desperate situations. It sucks to feel like you have to join the military because the starting line is 100 paces ahead of you. All of it sucks my dude. My original point was that recruiters prey on desperation, remember? It’s just up there ⬆️⬆️

AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com on 18 Jun 14:39 collapse

Centuries*

AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 17 Jun 03:37 next collapse

Instead of “thank you for your service” I guess we’ll have to start saying, “fuck you for your service”

rumimevlevi@lemmings.world on 17 Jun 13:54 collapse

Considered that american wars after world war 2 is war of agressions never say thank for your service to any soldier

A_norny_mousse@feddit.org on 17 Jun 07:16 next collapse

I was thinking the same about the national guard deployed to LA.

I was hoping to find at least one article that focuses more on that part, but until then: what you said.

We - everywhere - need to talk about soldiers as people, not “the military”.

null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 17 Jun 12:14 collapse

I think there’s a huge difference between serving in a military controlled by a healthy democracy, and serving in a military controlled by an authoritarian regime.

Several weeks ago you could forgive someone for not realising that Trump is the latter, but not really any more.

A_norny_mousse@feddit.org on 17 Jun 14:35 collapse

weeks

I think you misspelled years

kayky@thelemmy.club on 17 Jun 09:21 next collapse

The nuremberg defense didn’t work for the nazis, why should it work for zionists?

SelfHigh5@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 10:16 collapse

Completely different the fuckin same

brachiosaurus@mander.xyz on 17 Jun 18:10 collapse

If your job is to support a government that murders children you are a criminal and a coward

eagleeyedtiger@lemmy.nz on 17 Jun 03:00 next collapse

Anyone else get the feeling WW3 has already started but we just haven’t realised it yet?

match@pawb.social on 17 Jun 03:49 next collapse

Imagine starting WW3 the weekend after 3% of your population came out to protest for other reasons. Your war weariness debuff will hit 100% in one turn.

eagleeyedtiger@lemmy.nz on 17 Jun 04:08 collapse

You could argue it started when Russia invaded Ukraine. But I wouldn’t mind Trump being forever remembered in history as the instigator.

NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 04:58 next collapse

I’d say annexed Crimea. (Unless that’s what you meant)

eagleeyedtiger@lemmy.nz on 17 Jun 06:17 collapse

You’re probably right

BrainInABox@lemmy.ml on 17 Jun 06:53 collapse

You could also argue it started when the US invaded Iraq

barsoap@lemm.ee on 17 Jun 05:29 next collapse

It’s not a world war if it’s not from the Austrian region of Germany, otherwise it’s just sparkling aggression.

ohulancutash@feddit.uk on 17 Jun 05:39 collapse

Austrian region of Germany? I presume with that level of geography you must be American.

Corn@lemmy.ml on 17 Jun 05:45 next collapse

Austria had already been annexed by Germany when WWII started

barsoap@lemm.ee on 17 Jun 06:45 collapse

Also Hitler was Austrian. Also Austrians are Bavarian.

Coincidentally, the current German minister of the interior is Bavarian and facing multiple criminal complaints regarding inciting subordinates to commit crimes.

AgentRocket@feddit.org on 17 Jun 06:49 next collapse

I think it’s a joke abaut how closely related the countries were, when they started the first 2 WWs (and maybe Hitler being Austrian)

Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee on 17 Jun 09:02 collapse

WWII literally began after Austria (Hitler’s homeland) was already a region of Germany (since March 38).

wiki/Anschluss
wiki/Reichsgau

<img alt="" src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/05/Germany1941.png">

taterthotsalad@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 05:49 next collapse

Doomer brain is toxic. WWIII will be a clear line. They have been.

eagleeyedtiger@lemmy.nz on 17 Jun 06:19 next collapse

Just speculating really. Mind enlightening me what the clear line will be?

taterthotsalad@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 13:55 collapse

Holy moly lemmy has the tard.

eagleeyedtiger@lemmy.nz on 17 Jun 22:09 collapse

Good chat mate. Really compelling argument.

Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee on 17 Jun 08:54 next collapse

They have been.

Months after assassination of Ferdinand the actual fighting began, and most projected it would be just anther war (common at the time in Europe, tho less common each century). People living through it knew nothing about it upfront.

We wildly think of WWII beginning with the invasion of Poland, but it took months for everyone (England included) to realise it wasn’t a war between two countries.

Not to mention how WWI & WWII are basically the same war in two seemingly inevitable parts.

And we have had a ton of proxy and/or cold wars between Russia & USA since WWII ended.

hydroptic@sopuli.xyz on 17 Jun 09:06 next collapse

Both world wars look like “clear lines” to you after the fact. Of course you can just point at, say, Ferdinand getting assassinated and go “yeah that’s what started WW I” but do you think anyone at that time thought “yup that’s going to start the mother of all wars”?

As others have pointed out they absolutely didn’t look like clear lines when they were kicking off.

prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 17 Jun 11:41 collapse

Why do people say such ignorant shit with so much confidence?

taterthotsalad@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 13:54 collapse

Because it is not normal. Nor is it mentally health to be fearful and scared of everything and nothing.

It’s a chronic mental health issue. But yeah go ahead and wave it off harder. That will make it healthier. Internet is getting dumber.

Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee on 17 Jun 08:46 next collapse

Yeah, like which of the recent events will be in future textbooks as the trigger for WWIII, and how will it all lead back to WWI (like WWII is basically a direct consequence of conditions of pre-WWI and major events related to the war & post-war treaties - WWIII in this config is a consequence of WWI/WWII & the forced hegemony/colonialism of USA that followed).

prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 17 Jun 11:37 collapse

WW2 happened like 25 years after WW1.

It’s already been over 80 years since the start of WW2, so I’m not sure you can really assume that they’ll be that related.

Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee on 17 Jun 12:36 collapse

So what caused WWII?

I assume your answer is ‘one man’?

In the same way “terrorist groups” arent created by the dominant force exerting mass injustice?

prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 18 Jun 14:02 collapse

There’s no singular cause of WW2. However, in retrospect, many people would say when Germany invaded Poland.

That said, USSR and Finland were already fighting at that point, as well as Japan and China. It’s not a clear line.

Why would you assume that my answer would be “one man”? It was an incredibly complex conflict that was really a collection of smaller regional conflicts with various allies between them.

Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee on 18 Jun 14:34 collapse

Why would you assume that my answer would be “one man”? It was an incredibly complex conflict that was really a collection of smaller regional conflicts with various allies between them.

&

There’s no singular cause of WW2.

Because basically all of those reasons are the same as WWI but amplified by the restrictions (manufactured economic crisis) posed upon Germany at the end of WWI.

That is why I said it can be viewed as the same war.
(Imho - anyways it’s literally just semantics, perhaps propaganda of the victors a bit.)

Much like (the recent-ish) Russia in Ukraine - it’s usually not viewed as two separate wars, one in 2014 & the other in 2022. Bcs it’s the same thing, it was oblivious that it isn’t over & both Russia & NATO/Ukraine have all been actively preparing each year.

However, in retrospect, many people would say when Germany invaded Poland. That said, USSR and Finland were already fighting at that point, as well as Japan and China.

Yeah, Japan in China started basically in 31 (13 years after official end of WWI, a much more European thing), whereas Germany’s first foreign move was the military invasion of Austria in 38.

null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 17 Jun 11:59 next collapse

Yeah. It feels that way. What defines a world war anyway? Is it just when “most” countries become engaged in a major conflict?

eagleeyedtiger@lemmy.nz on 17 Jun 23:53 collapse

I assume most nations of the world taking part is correct. According to Wikipedia WW2 is considered to have started after the invasion of Poland and subsequently UK and France declaring war on Germany, however there were other events beforehand:

The causes of World War II included unresolved tensions in the aftermath of World War I and the rise of fascism in Europe and militarism in Japan. Key events preceding the war included Japan’s invasion of Manchuria in 1931, the Spanish Civil War, the outbreak of the Second Sino-Japanese War in 1937, and Germany’s annexations of Austria and the Sudetenland. World War II is generally considered to have begun on 1 September 1939, when Nazi Germany, under Adolf Hitler, invaded Poland, after which the United Kingdom and France declared war on Germany.

Considering how much the world has changed since then with advances in technology etc., I think WW3 will look very different if it happens.

brachiosaurus@mander.xyz on 17 Jun 18:25 collapse

WW3 is any ruler biggest dream because it would grant them the highest amount of power they can get. WW3 won’t happen as long as people refuse to go to war because rulers never fight their wars and they need pawns who do die for them. You will get a world war once enough people get brainwashed to fought one. Watch out for government and war propaganda.

Bouzou@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 04:06 collapse

My God though, can you imagine magas abiding by wartime rationing?? People lost their shit when they were asked, “Please maybe just don’t sneeze on strangers in public 5 times a week…”

peoplebeproblems@midwest.social on 17 Jun 03:50 next collapse

I didn’t call it, but there’s nothing quite like a war to distract the population from rampant decline at home.

This one is weird though, Iran is allied with Russia. Israel is allied with the US. Historically, this made sense.

But Trump and Putin playing war together would benefit both of them. It allows Putin to pull out of Ukraine because “Iran provided us much help and they need us now.” And it allows Russia to maintain the war economy. It benefits Trump because he wants to play war.

Neither leader would have any actual skin in the game, it’s just people’s lives that would never contribute in another meaningful way to their power.

I don’t like this. This is feeling more 1984 than 1984.

Edit: I like this even worse after I read the specifics of the KC-135R and KC-46A. Each can carry about 200,000 lbs of additional fuel. A single F-15E can hold 13,000 lbs internally. 30 KC-135Rs can refuel an entire F-15E 460 times. Israel has 7 KC-130H (60,000lbs) and 7 Boeing 707s (which is what the KC-135 was based on). This isn’t just escalation, this is staging for invasion.

Tillman@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 04:17 next collapse

The nice thing about Americans going to war is that it reduces the amount of dodge owners drag racing late at night. Silver linings.

victorz@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 05:42 next collapse

Sounds like personal beef.

Ledericas@lemm.ee on 17 Jun 05:53 collapse

yea its a distraction from all the protests, its really making him look bad, but he has the msms focusing on this instead, plus he was using the parade and the shootings as another distraction as well. right now the news practically ignoring the protests. using the. BANNER strategy, flood the MSM with so much crap its hard to focus on one thing. its also known as the firehose of falsehood which is a Russian strategy for propaganda.

13igTyme@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 06:58 next collapse

Before COVID, 2020 started off with Trump drone striking a foreign diplomat and nearly starting WW3.

l_isqof@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 07:29 next collapse

Both Putin and Trump are approaching dead-ends in their current campaigns. This ICE stuff can’t end well for him with so many people out last weekend, and Putin is well stuck in Ukraine, as you say. Whilst they may not be personally interested in the future of Iran and them having nukes by itself, they may need this to save their skin, actually.

Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 17 Jun 10:28 next collapse

Neither leader would have any actual skin in the game, it’s just people’s lives that would never contribute in another meaningful way to their power.

Cold War 2: now with more stupid!

Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca on 17 Jun 11:20 next collapse

Ukraine could throw a wrench in their plans by simply not accepting whatever Putin offers. He’s then left with “stay out of it and stay in Ukraine” or “join Trump and risk Ukraine flanking into Russian territory”

lolonaut@discuss.tchncs.de on 17 Jun 12:58 next collapse

They hope Iran does something, that warrants NATOs article 5 to be triggered. Either the other Nato countries follow along, weakening Europe, or they don’t, which basically desolves NATO and thus, weakening Europe.

Donjamos@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 13:41 collapse

No one in Europe still counts on the US in case of an article 5 situation

Attacker94@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 13:48 next collapse

Not to mention that this gives him a legitimate reason to invoke the alien enemies act, not that he needed them in the first place, but it will tie up the courts even further.

BrainInABox@lemmy.ml on 17 Jun 15:44 next collapse

Come on now, you don’t need to invoke some BlueAnon conspiracy to explain why the US would attack Iran; it’s been champing at the bit to do so for decades.

AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com on 18 Jun 14:37 collapse

It allows Putin to pull out of Ukraine

Why would Putin pull out of Ukraine? Russia is currently advancing and has a much better position in this war of attrition, and the more it keeps gaining, the better the “peace terms” will be in the end. Putin’s not fearing for his next term since elections in Russia are manipulated, the Russian economy is alive and well, and in military terms he’s in no hurry

wax@feddit.nu on 17 Jun 04:45 next collapse

I wonder where we’d be today if Trump didn’t pull out of the nuclear agreement with Iran. Might not have made a difference, who knows.

NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 04:57 next collapse

Israel would have scratched their butt, then made up another reason to bomb them.

rumimevlevi@lemmings.world on 17 Jun 13:42 collapse

I would still expect israel to attack iran. There is no way that the proxy war could last foverer

wanderwisley@lemm.ee on 17 Jun 04:54 next collapse

I’m bringing peace to the Middle East! The peace president! 🫲🍊🫱

NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 04:56 next collapse

Don’t ya know, he ended the war in Ukraine on day 1!

Donjamos@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 13:43 collapse

USA bringing peace usually involves a lot of military airplanes so I don’t see your point

Mrkawfee@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 06:30 next collapse

The silver lining is that this will accelerate the decline of the US Empire which in turn will weaken Israel. Although this will be too late for the millions who have been or are still to be killed because of these psychopathic regimes.

Doorbook@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 07:30 next collapse

Israel is a project, literary run by people not their in the first place, so even if US Empire collapse they will move their money to the next dominant power.

Mrkawfee@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 09:01 collapse

I don’t think China gives a shit about Zionism. There’s no natural pool of evangelical Christians to brainwash.

China is self-sufficient and has advanced military tech that is at least equivalent to what the US has. Israel has nothing to offer it besides localised spying or murdering people.

Russia is a possibility but it has always found common cause with the Arab nations and Iran so wouldnt be as reliable. It’s also not as powerful.

The US is the only sugar daddy for this parasitic colony.

rumimevlevi@lemmings.world on 17 Jun 13:41 collapse

When did china has imperial ambitions in the middle east? From history i only saw cooperation.

Mrkawfee@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 15:55 collapse

True. It does not have the warmongering malign ambitions that settler colonial states like the US and Israel have.

kent_eh@lemmy.ca on 17 Jun 16:02 collapse

The silver lining is that this will accelerate the decline of the US Empire

But not without a tremendous loss of life.

slaacaa@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 07:06 next collapse

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/89256f69-e24e-474c-8e04-8da2bcc26e12.jpeg">

Grizzlyboy@lemmy.zip on 17 Jun 07:11 next collapse

And again we see old incompetent white men starting another war.

ToastedRavioli@midwest.social on 17 Jun 07:50 next collapse

A society goes to shit when old men start wars whose conflict they know they shall never fight in

Tiger666@lemmy.ca on 17 Jun 11:47 collapse

Nice one.

barneypiccolo@lemm.ee on 17 Jun 14:06 collapse

Chicken Hawks who wouldn’t go when they were called, but will happily send everyone else’s children to die for their oil.

As soon as HitlerPig starts his war, he’ll call for a draft. There is no way my son will fight in a MAGA War.

RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 08:34 next collapse

Trump is after Iran’s eggs, I guess. He promised the people of the US lower egg prices, he will get them from Iran.

How can people in the US be okay with this? Their quality of life has only decreased since Bush 2 started his wars of terror. A propagandized population driven to hate others and rally behind the president.

As unlikely as it may be, I hope the US loses quickly and decisively against Iran. Not in 20 years from now like in Afghanistan, but soon. I don’t know what cards Iran has, what leverage they may have, but I hope they have something that enables them to inflict pain.

Barberserk@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 11:06 next collapse

Iran is defending, that’s why the americans cannnot win this war. They don’t have enough bombs to kill every iranian from the sky.

Deflated0ne@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 13:46 collapse

Can’t win a ground war. And they know it. Hence the 30 air tankers. Gonna be another shock and awe air campaign. Except half of the middle east or more will be taking part.

Guess its time for the US to lose another war. We haven’t won one since the Soviets won WWII for us.

Bloomcole@crazypeople.online on 17 Jun 15:17 collapse

They have hypersonic missiles, which the US or any western country fails to make.
They can hit targets as far as the US base in Cyprus.
Up to now they didn’t even use their best missiles against the genocider entity, and already the Iron Sieve is failing.
F-35’s down etc…
US pissed off when attacked even by Ansar Allah in Yemen. And jets happened to fall in the water a few times. LOL
This will be no Afghanistan, this will hurt.

BrainInABox@lemmy.ml on 17 Jun 15:42 next collapse

The people of the US have never seen a brutal invasion of the middle east they didn’t support.

Zenith@lemm.ee on 17 Jun 16:31 collapse

I’m reading this book called Heartland that actually really deep dives into why so many Americans are ok with this, the fact of the matter is huge parts of the US have been living in abject poverty since basically always and it’s part of their culture to not need much, wanting things is looked down on as weakness, it’s a cultural part of long term poverty for huge swaths of the US, that living a hard life is the only way to live, there’s obviously many layers to this but it’s not a thing you can just think your way out of (because not getting educated is also part of this culture) since culture and identity are so deeply intertwined and you see that culture being actively promoted and spread via “trad culture” which is very much popular, especially with young men, trad is just code for poor

kayky@thelemmy.club on 17 Jun 09:16 next collapse

Time to waste hundreds of billions defending israel while our infrastructure crumbles and our citizens still go without healthcare.

Again.

SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca on 19 Jun 01:54 collapse

Gotta keep the Middle East under control so gas prices don’t get too high. Americans vote for low gas prices and then pretend to be upset about what needs to be done to keep them low. But y’all will keep voting for low gas prices, so it’s all hypocrisy.

belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 17 Jun 09:41 next collapse

Where can one acquire an anti air missile?

Agent641@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 09:54 next collapse

CIA in the 80s

floofloof@lemmy.ca on 17 Jun 14:21 next collapse

Aisle 23 at Home Depot, I think.

belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 17 Jun 16:54 collapse

Alles klar, Regal 23 im Bauhaus

Camzing@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 14:24 next collapse

Ask chatgtp.

nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org on 17 Jun 21:41 collapse

I think some French (?) guy managed to get a hold of some that didn’t have warheads and took apart the guidance systems on YouTube.

Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz on 17 Jun 09:56 next collapse

This is basic dictator playbook, problems in domestic politics, start a war and problems change to foreign policy.

Putin has done this multiple times now, and Trump is following up.

OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca on 17 Jun 10:10 next collapse

This is why I say Canada, Greenland, and Mexico are not safe. Added to the fact that all 3 countries have lots of resources the US needs.

null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 17 Jun 11:53 next collapse

Wouldn’t this cause catastrophic domestic problems though. I think the US would tear itself apart trying to go to war with either of those three. Greenland perhaps less-so but still incredibly distasteful.

OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca on 17 Jun 13:55 collapse

They won’t defend their own democracy. They won’t defend mine.

Donjamos@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 13:39 collapse

Don’t forget panama

driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br on 17 Jun 15:11 collapse

If the US ever try to take out the Panama channel it would fuck up bigly international commerce. Basically only the US military is going to use it because no insurance company is going to cover ships going through them, and without insurance ships can’t even leave port.

Donjamos@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 17:50 collapse

Not take out. Take over. And therefore control said trade.

BrainInABox@lemmy.ml on 17 Jun 15:41 next collapse

As if any USA president wouldn’t be doing the same thing.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 16:03 collapse

Putin has done this multiple times now, and Trump is following up.

The United Russia party has had a chokehold on Russian elections practically since the day the USSR was dismantled.

There’s a lot more to their socio-economic dominance than Russia just starting new wars. RU controls the national media, they have deep roots in petrochemicals and finance and real estate, they’re mobbed up, they have control of the military across the officer’s corps, and they’re embedded all through local government.

Putin could be the biggest peacenik hippie in Russia and that party wouldn’t budge from its perch.

He’s doing these wars because he’s fascist. Not because he’s doing 11D politics chess.

Zenith@lemm.ee on 17 Jun 16:24 next collapse

Everything you said is true of the GOP/American Right as well, and they do it the same way, through oligarchy, it’s just a matter of they having more time to ratchet it down where the US is just getting its official start, although it’s been working behind the scenes towards this for decades too

Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz on 17 Jun 16:53 collapse

Starting a war isn’t really 11D thing, it is more like “me big army, me attack” vibe. Even the orange orangutan can figure that one out.

Russia has two exports, fossil energy and war. They know nothing else.

Putin and his party are one and the same.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 17:54 collapse

Russia has two exports, fossil energy and war.

Russia is the only country left with a functioning space program. Also, one of the few remaining virgin steel manufacturers, in large part thanks to their domestic supply of iron and cheap energy. And, like Ukraine, it is a major regional breadbasket (one of the knock on effects of the war has been a one-two punch to cereal exports into Africa and the Middle East).

They don’t have the manpower that China and India enjoy, so they never properly built up their high end service and manufacturing base, even in the Soviet Era. But the “Russia’s just an oversized gas station” line doesn’t hold up to any kind of close inspection.

Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz on 17 Jun 18:27 collapse

60% of their export is fossil energy, it is a banana republic

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 18:48 collapse

60% of their export is fossil energy

China, India, and Turkiye have been ravenous in their demand for petrochemicals. These sectors have been growing at a breakneck pace.

it is a banana republic

Which large US business conglomerate is extracting fruit produce from Russia through armed occupation at below market rates?

Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz on 17 Jun 20:26 collapse

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_republic

“In political science, the term banana republic describes a politically and economically unstable country with an economy dependent upon the export of natural resource.”

They are so dependable on fossil fuel export that they try to sway all other nations to use fossil fuels and generate crisis on it to tie other nations closer to it’s only source of power in global market. Russia has less GDP than Italy. They are not super power anymore, and every nation should try to get away from their fossil fuels.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 20:37 collapse

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_republic

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Fruit_Company

it came to control vast territories and transportation networks in Central America, the Caribbean coast of Colombia, and the West Indies. Although it competed with the Standard Fruit Company (later Dole Food Company) for dominance in the international banana trade, it maintained a virtual monopoly in certain regions, some of which came to be called banana republics – such as Costa Rica, Honduras, and Guatemala.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_republic#Etymology

In the early 20th century, the United Fruit Company, a multinational corporation, was instrumental in the creation of the banana republic phenomenon. Together with other American corporations, such as the Cuyamel Fruit Company, and leveraging the power of the U.S. government, the corporations created the political, economic, and social circumstances that led to a coup of the locally elected democratic government that established banana republics in Central American countries such as Honduras and Guatemala; No official apology has ever been done by any banana company or the U.S. with only the C.I.A. backed dictator of Guatemala apologizing in 2011

:-|

They are so dependable on fossil fuel export that they try to sway all other nations to use fossil fuels

Ah, Okay. I think I understand the problem here.

dariusj18@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 10:31 next collapse

Search “Altlantic Trident 25”

crimsonpoodle@pawb.social on 17 Jun 11:31 next collapse

Under rated comment— is planned excercise in Finland it seems although they don’t mention tankers so who knows

thecoffeehobbit@sopuli.xyz on 17 Jun 12:19 next collapse

Yeah we’re gonna use like 1 tanker for that, 2 on a busy day. The 28 others are going somewhere else

fmtx@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 17 Jun 13:19 next collapse
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz on 17 Jun 18:28 collapse

This is not part of that, these tankers are escorting fighters to the middle east

itamilradar.com/…/large-scale-usaf-deployment-to-…

dariusj18@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 10:14 collapse

That article is talking about tankers deployed from their European bases.

brachiosaurus@mander.xyz on 18 Jun 10:28 collapse

read the article

“Over the past hours, at least 20 tankers took off from various bases across Europe—including Prestwick (UK), Morón (Spain), and Ramstein (Germany)—to support what can now be confirmed as a large-scale redeployment of U.S. fighter jets to the Middle East.”

dariusj18@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 22:53 collapse

~~Yes, and the OP article is talking about tankers going across the Atlantic. So these are two separate things. (Maybe related things, but neither article connects the two)

I personally found no source relating then, but I may not know what to search for.~~

Edit: I see now that the OP did list those as airbase where tankers landed after crossing the Atlantic.

Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 17 Jun 11:25 next collapse

Wasn’t Trump the peaceful dove?

Bluewing@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 12:15 next collapse

No US president is a peace dove. Between supporting proxie wars to police actions to declared war, they all end up getting people killed by bombs.

ikidd@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 14:31 next collapse

Everyone knew he wasn’t going to be able to curtail democratic elections without the excuse of a war. This is on schedule.

RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 15:39 next collapse

Good thing states control the elections.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 15:55 next collapse

We’ve got an election in NYC right now, with a pro-Palestine Muslim threatening to upset Trump’s close friend Andrew Cuomo. Weird that nobody is claiming this election is being threatened by Trump, given that NYC has an enormous stock of Trump/Kushner accumulated capital.

kent_eh@lemmy.ca on 17 Jun 16:00 next collapse

Unfortunately the republican run states will bend over whenever Trump tells them to.

RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 16:26 collapse

That’s not true, they are protesting too.

kent_eh@lemmy.ca on 17 Jun 17:04 collapse

I mean the republican lawmakers, not the citizens.

turtlesareneat@discuss.online on 17 Jun 16:13 next collapse

Or 50x the chances for hijinx, depending on your angle.

throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works on 17 Jun 16:58 next collapse

What happens when the federal and state government disagree?

looks at US history book at 1860

👀

ubergeek@lemmy.today on 17 Jun 17:32 next collapse

Not anymore. The SCOTUS ruled already that they must have their ballots approved by the Feds, and feds can overrule their ballots.

RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 17:52 collapse

False

ubergeek@lemmy.today on 17 Jun 18:53 collapse

So, Donald wasn’t allowed to appear on the Colorado ballot, being an insurrectionist?

RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 19:20 collapse

That’s a state issue, not a federal issue.

Donald Trump was allowed to remain on the Colorado ballot despite the challenge based on the 14th Amendment’s insurrection clause, because the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that states lack the authority to remove federal candidates from the ballot under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.

There is nothing about “approval” from feds, nor is there a process federally to approve such things. There’s courts. That’s it.

ubergeek@lemmy.today on 18 Jun 13:42 collapse

So, the SCOTUS ruled the feds control who is on the ballots in each state, right?

There is no such thing as a federal ballot.

RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 14:23 collapse

No. You don’t really understand this topic.

ubergeek@lemmy.today on 20 Jun 15:26 collapse

Didn’t the SCOTUS rule that the state of Colorado MUST allow Trump to be on the ballot, even though the state had already determined he is ineligible per their rules?

I’m starting to think either you don’t understand the topic, or you’re being purposefully incorrect here.

JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml on 17 Jun 17:37 next collapse

I mean, Trump just illegally deployed the national guard and the marines in California. He needed the state’s permission (which he didn’t get) to deploy the guard and deploying the marines is on a whole other level of illegal.

[deleted] on 17 Jun 17:45 collapse
.
ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 17:47 collapse

I always thought Trump could curtail democratic elections without the excuse of war … by relying on a convenient terrorist attack instead.

Dogyote@slrpnk.net on 17 Jun 20:10 collapse

Nah, a war in the middle east is normal. Nobody would accept a normal situation as justification to cancel elections.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 15:51 collapse

No.

We had a lot of “I’m willing to make deals with anyone” rhetoric from the Trump campaign that low-info voters took to mean he was anti-war.

But the underlying Pentagon leadership hasn’t significantly changed between Biden and Trump (or Bush and Trump, for that matter). Its all the same neoconservative think tanks writing variations on Project For A New American Century for the modern government.

The idea that you were going to elect an anti-war president went out the window during the primaries. Vanishingly few federal office holders have shown opposition to attacking Iran. Less than what we had in 2003 against Iraq.

Everyone from Richie Torres to Mike Lee seem on board with a brand new Holocaust in the Middle East.

capital@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 23:40 next collapse

But the underlying Pentagon leadership hasn’t significantly changed between Biden and Trump (or Bush and Trump, for that matter). Its all the same neoconservative think tanks writing variations on Project For A New American Century for the modern government.

That isn’t congress or the president. Pentagon leadership doesn’t declare war. Congress has the power to declare war which hasn’t happened for some time and since then the president has basically done so, although arguable that it’s been a “formal” declaration of war.

This is what people voted for, up and down the ballot. US voters put Trump at the top and yes men in the house and senate.

Vote better next time, I guess.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 14:45 collapse

Congress has the power to declare war

That they fully abdicated with the 2001 AUMF, which they keep renewing specifically so they don’t have to ever make these decisions.

This is what people voted for

The people vote for candidates, not policies. And they candidates they vote for routinely talk out of both sides of their mouths. NDAAs regularly pass with overwhelming bipartisan support, even as a super-majority of Congresscritters campaign against this or that component of them.

Vote better next time, I guess.

I was told to VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO because there is a Cheeto In The White House. If both major parties field pro-war candidates, what’s the move?

grue@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 01:49 collapse

But the underlying Pentagon leadership hasn’t significantly changed between Biden and Trump (or Bush and Trump, for that matter).

That’s not strictly true. Trump purged a lot of leadership that was loyal to the Constitution rather than personally to him.

But your overall point about the war-hawkishness remains valid.

Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz on 17 Jun 15:33 next collapse

I discovered this on another post comment but I think it belongs here more:

inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=nCP3LZoxABs

wabafee@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 16:36 next collapse

Clearly moon bears being transported.

OozingPositron@feddit.cl on 17 Jun 18:23 collapse

>Error: access denied: denied by administrative rule

Awesome.

wetsoggybread@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 20:45 next collapse

Its a skit from The Whitest Kids You Know, “Are we going to war with Iran”

Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz on 17 Jun 22:20 collapse

It’s basically a youtube link, just switch instance or you can try replacing inv.nadeko.net with youtube.com

RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 15:39 next collapse

Well, so much for peace talks.

demunted@lemmy.ml on 18 Jun 00:05 collapse

When you are 0/2 why go for 3…

throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works on 17 Jun 16:55 next collapse

WW3 Here we go! 🎉🥳

/s

HugeNerd@lemmy.ca on 17 Jun 23:52 collapse

Any tips? Like do I hoard rice, beans, sugar, spices, things I can trade with other people?

Should I get a pro-grade slingshot, maybe a bow and arrow?

throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works on 18 Jun 00:00 next collapse

Don’t ask me for tips.

I’d probably just kill myself, I wouldn’t have the will to live.

I hope reincarnation is real and I get to be born in an advanced post-scarcity civillization somewhere out there in the universe/multiverse where I can enjoy hundreds orntousands of years being a captain of a starship just mapping the universe.

Unfotunately, that’s just me daydreaming, its too far fetched to be real.

(Okay maybe get some ham radios and some portable ones, stored in an EM-Shielded container with some solar panel batteries? Communication might be important. But, ask yourself: do you really want to live in a nuclear apocalypse?)

TheLastOfHisName@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 18 Jun 12:53 collapse

I was a teenager during the 80s. My family lived across the Red River from Barksdale AFB, not a far drive at all. Barksdale is a SAC base, and a known target for Soviet missiles. Our plan at the time was if we had enough notice that the missiles were actually falling, we’d get in the cars and drive as close as possible to Barksdale so we could, hopefully, be vaporized.

No. You do not want to live in a world post global nuclear conflict. If it comes down to that, I will see myself out.

YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca on 18 Jun 00:07 next collapse

Hoard stuff that you want to actually eat

Soggy@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 01:12 collapse

Learn high-density home gardening and safe food preservation. That said, white rice does store a long time so it’s a good thing to hoard if you’re worried about food availability.

brachiosaurus@mander.xyz on 17 Jun 17:54 next collapse

This is really big and scary

itamilradar.com/…/large-scale-usaf-deployment-to-…

Donjuanme@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 21:27 next collapse

🌮

outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 17 Jun 21:34 collapse

Ueah. Yeah its pretty fucked.

The shitty thing is: this mother fucker woild love iranian culture. It’s super good at all the shit he fakes like gold plated shit.

Ledericas@lemm.ee on 18 Jun 03:42 next collapse

he loves russia more.

AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com on 18 Jun 14:30 collapse

Please, don’t talk like that of Iranian culture. Iran was well on its way towards progressivism, secularism and ending absolute monarchy during the early 1950s, under the presidency of Mosaddegh. This implied developing the country and Iran profiting from its own oil, instead of giving all the profits to British Petroleum, so the US and UK did a military economic embargo of Iran, and staged a coup that reinstated the Shah. Iran could be a perfectly progressive and developed country today if it weren’t for the west destroying every country that attempts to take control of its own future.

outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 18 Jun 15:08 collapse

No im saying iran does the good version of the ‘incredibly baroque luxury’ shit trump kind of shittily imitates. Iranian culture has the not-entirely-tacky-shit version of that.

And yeah, imperialism sucks.

skozzii@lemmy.ca on 17 Jun 18:23 next collapse

US is going to be bankrupt by the time he is done his second term.

CitizenKong@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 21:16 collapse

I mean, that’s just on brand for him. If anything, he has shown a talent for bankrupcy.

MetalMachine@feddit.nl on 17 Jun 18:49 next collapse

We need to fix the voting system. ALL pacs should be banned and campaign spending should be limited.

lepinkainen@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 18:57 next collapse

So NOW they want to have bases in Europe?

AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com on 18 Jun 14:27 collapse

Huh? You do know that the US has bases in Europe since WW2 right?

lepinkainen@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 15:48 collapse

And you do know Taco Don had a massive meltdown and told everyone the US won’t be having bases in Europe any more.

To a point where personnel in Rammstein base cancelled plans on buying houses in the city.

nbcnews.com/…/pentagon-considering-proposal-cut-t…

washingtonpost.com/…/us-troops-europe-trump-russi…

AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com on 18 Jun 16:16 collapse

Yeah, the US empire sadly won’t be pulling out its bases from the EU anytime soon. I wish it did, though

Jhex@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 19:56 next collapse

worry not. remember this is TACO Don… he’ll chicken out again

CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org on 17 Jun 20:21 next collapse

Yeah, it seems fairly impossible he’ll get fully into the war, and even lending a few bunker busters would be surprising when that’s risking a blowback on American forces.

I would guess that Trump is expecting Khomanei to cave, because that’s what he’d do. Most likely, he won’t, Trump will be confused, and this will drag on and on until a regional nuclear exchange is on the table.

ansiz@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 23:16 next collapse

Who is exchanging nukes in that? Israel and who else?

floofloof@lemmy.ca on 17 Jun 23:39 next collapse

Reciprocal nukes like Trump’s reciprocal tariffs.

Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 00:20 next collapse

Hasn’t Iran been talking about ramping up nuclear weapons production since like the end of last year? I don’t think they’re actually a nuclear capable nation but I could see them posturing like they are

ansiz@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 11:39 collapse

Posturing is what Iran does. They’ve done that at least since the early 90s. But US intelligence services have repeatedly come to the conclusion that Iran is not ramping up production, at least based on the briefs even from a few months ago earlier this year.

CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org on 18 Jun 00:30 collapse

Iran or Iran’s splinter states. They have several bombs worth of uranium that’s almost ready.

I doubt the US would get involved, and nobody else is going to for sure.

ansiz@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 11:43 collapse

That’s the same talking point we’ve heard for decades but even US intelligence reports have said the opposite, even earlier this year. I’m sure they could create dirty bombs but that only requires nuclear power plant waste.

CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org on 18 Jun 15:10 collapse

No, we’ve heard they have some kinda enriched stuff, some centrifuges and could maybe someday have a bomb for decades. It’s a bit less theoretical now, they’ve been gradually enriching more and more since the US broke off the agreement:

In February 2023, the IAEA reported having found uranium in Iran enriched to 84%. The Iranian government has claimed that this is an “unintended fluctuation” in the enrichment levels, though the Iranians have been openly enriching uranium to 60% purity, a breach of the 2015 nuclear deal. In 2024, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian expressed interest in reopening discussions with the United States on the nuclear deal.

They have a significant amount, too, and if I were them I would be hiding it carefully in non-obvious places where it can’t be buried by an airstrike.

[deleted] on 18 Jun 03:41 collapse
.
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org on 18 Jun 15:05 collapse

What do you mean? Israel is doing Russia a solid for some reason?

Also, nothing has been redirected yet. It takes a while for stuff to move through the military supply chain and into the hands of Ukrainian forces, or Israeli ones, and even then you’d need the US to pass different funding legislation.

kreskin@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 23:25 next collapse

He openly calls service members suckers and losers. I dont know that he much cares whats done with them.

NikkiDimes@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 23:29 next collapse

He also said if he was president there’d be no more wars, so this obviously totally super duperly cannot happen.

Blackmist@feddit.uk on 18 Jun 00:03 collapse

It’s not a war, it’s a special military operation.

NikkiDimes@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 01:19 collapse

Only for a day

sudo@programming.dev on 18 Jun 01:16 collapse

This comment will age poorly if he don’t.

Jhex@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 01:40 next collapse

that’s not even in the list of things I’d consider giving a fuck about

OrteilGenou@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 02:01 collapse

It’ll just change to TOCO, Trump Occasionally Chickens Out

kreskin@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 23:29 next collapse

A-10 movement always preceeds ground deployments. They moved those to Kuwait at the end of March. This has been coming for a while, its not an unplanned thing like it appears.

plyth@feddit.org on 18 Jun 05:00 next collapse

Where are those informations diskussed? If the information was out in March then Lemmy as a whole is not good at filtering the relevant news.

kreskin@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 06:12 next collapse

For A-10s theres probably 4 active squadrons, 2 national guard, 1 reserve 74th (Georgia), 75th (Georgia), 354th (Fairbanks), 190th (Boise national guard), 107th (michigan) is in Afghanistan

45th/47th reserve, not sure

They are phasing all A-10s out and replacing with other aircraft, f-16s for the 25th.

25th has a great insignia: <img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/bfec2c7b-c80a-44b5-8115-a4f046d1e79b.png">

ang.af.mil/…/idaho-air-national-guards-fighter-wi…

taskandpurpose.com/…/a10-warthogs-middle-east-hou….

plyth@feddit.org on 18 Jun 06:31 collapse

Thank you.

AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com on 18 Jun 14:26 collapse

The news community over at Hexbear.net made abundant analysis of this

sirico@feddit.uk on 18 Jun 08:43 collapse

Also indicates complete air superiority in guessing Israel has removed a fair amount of threat

smol_beans@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 23:55 next collapse

Early 2000’s era nostalgia goin real hard

HugeNerd@lemmy.ca on 18 Jun 00:13 next collapse

Operation Desert Shield, redux, again. Hey at least the music of the era is relevant again

youtu.be/VI3C6MROOvY

Soggy@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 01:06 collapse

The worst part of anti-war music is that it never stops being relevant. Blast off! It’s party time!

f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz on 18 Jun 20:31 collapse

Yeah… Bad headline; this is completely precedented.

catty@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 00:39 next collapse

I fucking hate this rhetoric which is: OIL! GAS! BUY OIL! BUY GAS! KEEP PUTIN HAPPY! OIL! GAS!

No one was taking the ‘war’ between Israel and Iran seriously last week after the initial surge in oil price because the USA was like… “yeah, nah”. Now, after a quick call from Putin and bam, all this BS about how the US is pandering for war to drive commodity and share prices up when it’s a nothingburger.

Remember kids, buy oil, buy gas and do as you’re told.

T00l_shed@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 03:36 collapse

I think RATM had something to say about your last 4 words

GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 18 Jun 03:42 next collapse

“Thank you sir, may I have another!”

catty@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 09:26 collapse

Retail traders beg to differ though and are doing as they’re told.

sudo@programming.dev on 18 Jun 01:24 next collapse

This would have to be the most unpopular war in US history and yet I think everyone Trump has surrounded himself with is telling him to do it.

smayonak@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 03:16 next collapse

This might sound insane but every single wartime president has gotten a huge boost to their approval ratings due to media networks circulating pure propaganda nonstop. Even NPR will start doing positive coverage.

Hobo@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 03:26 next collapse

It also isn’t true. LBJs approval rating absolutely tanked because of the Vietnam war.

Johnson’s approval ratings had dropped from 70 percent in mid-1965 to below 40 percent by 1967

millercenter.org/president/…/foreign-affairs

smayonak@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 04:17 collapse

It was perceived that he was losing the war and lying to the public about the successes that they claimed to have achieved.

But winning wars, even unjust ones, always gets the president brownie points in the eyes of the public and corporations

Ledericas@lemm.ee on 18 Jun 03:27 next collapse

the exception was covid, there was a huge downturn in recruitments, and they were getting worried. but military propaganda: top gun maverick helped boost numbers up. also the fact that they loosen some restrictions to join the military too. i was in a forum of people joining, during the obama years, and it was getting tougher to join. its mostly due to medical conditions that prevent people from joining.

sudo@programming.dev on 18 Jun 05:02 next collapse

The consent manufacturing machine will rev up like it always does. There’s already attempts to get us on board with a the fantasy of a regime change. As though that won’t lead to another ISIS or Libya.

But I really don’t think the average liberal boomer is going to fall in line behind Trump like they did Bush. And certainly not anyone younger. Dem leadership is probably already on board though.

smayonak@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 05:35 collapse

I don’t know if he’s serious about regime change in iran. He seems to negotiate from a raft of threats and lies. Hopefully it’s all for show but if the war does go down my guess for approval ratings is over 60%. Not quite Bush I or ii numbers due to decline in news consumption.

sudo@programming.dev on 18 Jun 05:43 collapse

I doubt anyone in power is deluded enough to think they can actually reinstate the Shah or something. They probably just want to bomb every piece if infrastructure in Iran and not worry about them for a few decades.

But regime change absolutely is the fantasy they are trying to sell liberals.

LadyButterfly@lazysoci.al on 18 Jun 09:33 collapse

Bingo. Plus if it drags on, he can attempt to stay in power because there’s a war.

ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 09:50 collapse

That’s basically Bibi’s strategy. :(

Naevermix@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 06:31 next collapse

I think Trump is attempting to scare Iran into accepting his nuclear deal. The only problem with this tactic is that Iran might not believe him as they know how deeply unpopular the war would be.

sudo@programming.dev on 18 Jun 20:12 collapse

I think Trump is attempting to scare Iran into accepting his nuclear deal.

Israel wouldn’t tolerate any deal though. They want no deal and permanent sanctions on Iran. Besides, we are well past talking about any nuclear deal.

Naevermix@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 20:17 collapse

So what’s the game plan, they’re going to bomb Iran into submission? That strategy has never worked in the history of warfare. They’d need boots on the ground and direct US involvement. And even then, this didn’t work in Afghanistan, nor Iraq.

sudo@programming.dev on 18 Jun 20:44 collapse

Are the bombs working? No. Are we going to keep bombing them? Yes.

– President Biden on Operation Prosperity

Naevermix@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 08:11 collapse

This War Will Destabilize The Entire Mideast Region And Set Off A Global Shockwave Of Anti-Americanism vs. No It Won’t

– The Onion, 2003

Doorbook@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 10:09 next collapse

It is clear that Israel want this war. And they clearly can’t do anything without the US and the UK at least. However, they commited insane genocidal attack in Gaza which might have been part of their plans to provoke a reaction that justify a war against Iran.

When that didn’t work and Trump made a deal with the Houthis in Yemen without their knowledge and was close to a deal with Iran they pulled the plug and basically put the US government under a situation where the have to join their war sooner or later eventhough it is not a good time for the US to do it.

lets imagine Trump administration just gone. Any other adminstration have a few options:

  • play a defensive rule, which cannot last for long as Iran have the means to a long term missile attacks, and Israel being small and there is a few main cities that can be targeted. Along with cost which will run their budgets down.
  • stop supporting Israel, which will make their allies nation to reach to China or Russia for guarantee protection and the US will lose its defense credibility.
  • forcing a ceasefire, which is impossible and Israel keep violating all their ceasefires. As they would like to the war to happen they will force it through escalation.

Along with the fact that Israel own the Congress, the Senate, and the US administration based on how many officials visit Israel and publicly endorsed by AIPAC, there are literally no other option.

The question now is how to make sure it is a popular war, it seems like they were trying to do it by the 6 day mark but couldn’t. The US government has two part, Zionist and MAGA supremacist, and the MAGA supremacist don’t want to be controlled by Jewish people and it feel as this is what stopping the US from joining now.

Most likely, they came to the conclusion that they will have to stage a false flag attack on US bases or assets to make it easier for the public to accept this war. This has been publicly stated by AIPAC speakers through out the years before 9/11, where now it feels more like a false flag as Benjamin Netanyahu keep mentioning “New York will be next”.

Ashiette@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 10:44 next collapse

Vietnam was pretty unpopular tbh.

AA5B@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 11:12 collapse

But was it in the beginning? I’m not old enough to remember what it was like when it started but clearly there was a lot of propaganda. The unpopularity seemed to manifest over time, as there was no goal and people dying over something most americans didn’t care about.

Or at least that’s my impression.

Ashiette@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 12:20 next collapse

I don’t know, I’m neither american nor old enough. However, since it was a different time and, as you so brilliantly told, the propaganda machine was at its summum. So there is no way to know how really unpopular things were. However, looking at the civil rights movement and the hippie era that was happening et the same time, we could conclude that it could have been more unpopular.

Don’t forget that the majority of trump voters are in favor of a war, particularly against a country they have seen as an enemy for a very long time - not forgetting the fact that it is also a muslim country, of which they are very biaised against.

You could say that there are no fundamental differences between the iranian government and the one they are willing to implement on US soil, except the fact that they are both centered around two different religions, however similar might their doctrines be.

To Trump voters, however, those words don’t have any weight as, again, iranians are seen as an enemy of the so-called freedom. That makes this war quite popular by essence.

jj4211@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 13:40 next collapse

I don’t personally know, but as far as I could tell, people in the USA were largely ok with the Vietnam war, until they started to draft people to send to Vietnam who never wanted to be in a military.

pahlimur@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 14:18 collapse

It’s not even hard to look this up, or maybe I already have the context having loved the 90s history channel. Vietnam had majority support for the first few years. But it was one of the first conflicts that was widely televised. Americans had never so quickly seen how fucked up war was, so support dropped off quickly. Weapons were also becoming a lot more fucked up during this time as well, adding to the visual horror.

anarchy79@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 14:35 collapse

$$$

Without war, American capitalist hegemony cannot sustain itself. It’s so sickening…

Gammelfisch@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 01:42 next collapse

If the shit hits the fan, I want too see every single fucking MAGA voter at a US Army recruiting office signing up for 11 Bravo, Grunt Infantry.

FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 04:45 next collapse

Eh, maybe cav scout or something in the 92 family (NOT 92R), we don’t want those asshats walking around with an M4/203 and frags.

Tattorack@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 11:46 collapse

Yes we do. Maybe they’ll blow themselves up.

Treetrimmer@sh.itjust.works on 19 Jun 03:55 collapse

Right. This could ultimately increase the median intelligence level…

elucubra@sopuli.xyz on 18 Jun 06:51 next collapse

Grunt infantry is redundant

Gammelfisch@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 12:43 collapse

Yeah, I should have placed parenthesis around infantry.

BobGnarley@lemm.ee on 18 Jun 17:36 collapse

Nah they’ll just cry on tiktok about how they “never expected this at all” so that people feel sorry for them. Even though they fucked everyone around them.

Auth@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 03:28 next collapse

I’m seeing a lot of posts drumming up war hype and WW3 fears but there is nothing to fight. Iran is already cooked and no one is wants to do a ground invasion of Iran. Iran’s allies have abandoned them. This is american security preparing for possible counter attacks and bombing targets, not a full on war. Iran is already at war with Isreal.

the_wiz@feddit.org on 18 Jun 04:43 next collapse

Ways that could escalate:

  • Iran finishes a nuke (or get one from somewhere [or use some other form of WMD]) and the regime decides to go out with a bang
  • China using the moment of distraction to try something funny with Taiwan
  • A new wave of international terrorism after the regime falls

So, even if that doesn’t escalate up to full on WWIII there is enough shit on the horizon to be worried

AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com on 18 Jun 14:25 collapse

How come your analysis of escalation only includes enemy states of the USA? Escalation has happened already twice because of Israel, and the US literally threatened to invade Greenland and Canada, and is considering joining a war against Iran.

lors852@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 09:06 next collapse

Wonder if they are on the way to liberate Greenland?

anarchy79@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 14:33 collapse

No, Israel is at war with Iran, not the other way around. Don’t try and Ukraine invaded Russia this shit. They’re in violation of international law and should be unanimously and globally condemned like the sick rabid little terrorist state they are.

They have nukes by the way. And we’re apparently A-OK with that! Fuck the USA for enabling that infected boil on humanity’s progress.

SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca on 19 Jun 01:50 collapse

Yeah and the little green men that showed up in Crimea in 2014 definitely had nothing to do with Russia! That’s what Russia said and we all believed them, right?

Are you pretending Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis are not Iranian proxies or are you actually that uninformed about these things? Iran regularly calls them their “Axis of Resistance” if you didn’t know. Iran’s proxies have been definitely attacking Israel for a long time.

How long can Iran have to send endless waves of Arabs to die as canon fodder before someone puts a stop to it? All of the Arab countries are too authoritarian and corrupt to do anything about Iran, so here we are.

obinice@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 03:43 next collapse

commondreams.org is on my PiHole block list for some reason, is it a low quality news source, or some such? It’s not a news outlet I’ve heard of, at least.

Edit: Ah, because it’s a shell going to a CDN that scoops up data and such, seemingly.

www.commondreams.org (blocked www.commondreams.org.cdn.rebelmouse.com)

SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca on 19 Jun 01:41 collapse

Yeah it’s a clickbait site for people who think they’re too smart to fall for clickbait.

Netrunner@programming.dev on 18 Jun 09:41 next collapse

Only idiots are excited about wars.

slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org on 18 Jun 10:31 next collapse

Americans in a nutshell

ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml on 18 Jun 13:09 collapse

US is about to go to war the day before I go down to the states to get an MRI, lovely.

edit: So idiots are excited about wars, but I’m also an idiot for not being excited about wars? Fair enough then, I can’t win.

Zink@programming.dev on 18 Jun 17:01 collapse

USian here who is also getting an MRI tomorrow. Fun coincidence and I wish you well on your alien abduction simulator!

The fortunate thing for you and me, and the unfortunate thing for humanity as a whole, is that daily life in the US is generally pleasant and undisturbed by brutal overseas military actions.

That’s a general theme of this place though. The country is massive and geographically isolated/protected while the military is spread all over the world doing shit all the time.

ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml on 20 Jun 04:20 collapse

Just got back home from getting my MRI. IT band syndrome in both of my knees, no tears or degeneration. I feel much better after hearing that!

My knees are both still kind of sore but at least I know why now lol

I’ll start physio and maybe get some better shoes and then hopefully I’ll be as good as new.

Jaberw0cky@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 16:28 collapse

Sounds like the perfect time for Canada, Greenland/Denmark and Panama to launch their preemptive strike and ensure regime change and eliminate US WMD.

RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 16:38 next collapse

lol yeah, okay

Zink@programming.dev on 18 Jun 17:16 collapse

If I woke up to discover that all of DC was a smoldering crater and those countries all offered us protected refugee status under Canada’s leadership, the strangest part would be living through world-changing history and having a GOOD feeling about it for once.

Toga65@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 17:25 next collapse

Healthcare at a reasonable cost you say?

Count me out in.

A leader who isn’t a complete fucking moron?

Also count me in.

Squizzy@lemmy.world on 18 Jun 18:01 collapse

You’d have to hit wall st and silicone valley at the same time.