Eyekaytee@aussie.zone
on 30 May 11:12
nextcollapse
True, EV’s are about things like value for money, quietness, reliability, lack of maintenance, all things expensive flashy cars detest and have no need for
It’s like making an economical artwork or cheap watch for a super rich person, what’s the point?
whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works
on 30 May 11:17
nextcollapse
lack of maintenance? I don’t see why it would be the case or why it would need less maintenance than a gas(thermal?) cars
unpossum@sh.itjust.works
on 30 May 11:26
nextcollapse
No oil changes at the very least. There are also around a zillion moving parts in a gas engine, most of which can wear.
Eyekaytee@aussie.zone
on 30 May 11:26
nextcollapse
You are not sure why EV’s need less maintenance? I don’t quite understand what you’re asking sorry
stepintomydojo@sh.itjust.works
on 30 May 11:30
nextcollapse
For the routine stuff: no engine oil to replace, no engine air filter, regenerative braking means you barely use the real brakes. Electric engines are also much simpler so there’s just less to go wrong and need fixing.
Yes, EVs come with a lot less maintenance and running costs. You’ll have to excuse the Facebook-quality image, but this does neatly sum up the main differences:
Oil changes, spark plugs, coolant, transmission fluid, and belts are all things I’ve had to maintain for my partner’s car in the past few years that my EV doesn’t need.
All the really awesome supercars are limited runs that aren’t even built until they are ordered. It’s almost about having a thing no one has. I showed you an electric one that flatly scoffed at your assertions and somehow you confabulated it into confirmation bias. You’ve lost the plot.
After getting an EV myself, the vroom is completely irrelevant IMO, I actually find the silent acceleration way cooler. 😎
The problem with the new Electric Ferrari is way more that the design is an uninteresting stereotype of an average small sportscar.
Agreed, there are some really cool ev hypercars out there and Ferrari could have done that and gotten positive responses, but instead they made the most boring looking car ever.
I love taking off in my EV and doing a tight turn without walking up the whole neighborhood. But people who buy expensive sport cars mostly want to be seen and heard, they’re not doing this for the driving comfort. I found my drive in a Ferrari lacking in comfort.
Eyekaytee@aussie.zone
on 30 May 11:31
nextcollapse
After getting an EV myself, the vroom is completely irrelevant IMO, I actually find the silent acceleration way cooler. 😎
How many Ferrari’s/Lamborghini/Supercars/Hypercars have you owned before?
I also prefer the faster take off at the lights but lets not pretend we’re the target market for Ferrari’s.
I think the principle is exactly the same, actually I think it’s even more cool in a super car. Because your acceleration is insane, but there is still almost no noise.
One of my neighbors have a pretty fast EV like zero to a hundred in less than 5 seconds. When he gives that car full pedal, it is absolutely awesome.
IMO a roaring ICE car is so outdated. For a more normal ICE car, it’s outright embarrassing, all that noise for nothing!
I know rich people tend to be narcissistic, so they may like the attention the noise makes, but generally they don’t like to be involuntary laughing stocks when they play with their expansive toys.
PS: Our car is pretty average for an EV, but still better than most ICE cars.
I love how we are on Lemmy, the poorest, rich people hating, communism wanting, most autistic place on the internet talking about what rich people want
For a more normal ICE car, it’s outright embarrassing, all that noise for nothing!
Yes that’s right, however they’re not driving a normal ICE, they’re driving a ferrari or lamborghini, the ones with millions of views for people just to hear the sound:
I would have believed this car was a Kia without a second thought if I saw it on the road with that badge. That’s not a compliment for either company, unfortunately.
Looks a lot like the recent Nissan Leaf. Slightly less bulky front and the leak has a solid black area at the front for the lights, but other than that almost the same look to the car.
batteries and inverters definitely take up more volume than an ice drivetrain. the advantage is that they can be put in more places than the mechanical linkages.
I'm pretty sure an ICE takes up more space, there's a lot more components to it. There's some very slim EV super cars. And yeah, way more flexibility with an EV system.
i’ve got a phev and lemme tell ya, those batteries are like three times the size (and weight) of the rest of the drivetrain combined, including fuel tank.
the bmw i3 rex is a pretty extreme example because it has a motorcycle engine, but they managed to cram the engine, inverter, gearbox and fuel tank into the space under the floor of the trunk, between the rear wheels, while the battery pack consists basically the bottom decimeter of the entire car. and that 9 liter tank doubles its range.
meanwhile the original chevy volt, a fwd car with an 1.6l i4, opted to keep the transmission tunnel and space where a rear axle would go to stuff them with batteries. really compromises the internal space, sacrifices a middle rear seat, and gives a whopping… 45km of electric range.
My point is simply that electric vs combustion power distribution and volume / mass differences make it, I assume, difficult to maintain the same design language.
Not at all, there's loads of fully electric super cars that look just how you would expect, sleeker even. This was a deliberate design decision from Ferrari.
Those batteries are a massive advantage for the design, they are put at the bottom like all other electric cars, and help keep the weigh center very low.
Engines and cooling also allow for much greater flexibility in design. But for some reason they decided to not use that greater design freedom to make an actual cool design, but more like if Tesla model 3 had a sports version with some body tuning.
The 700k price tag is not a problem for me, 500k or 700k doesn’t make any difference to me, I can’t afford either.
My price range is more like 60k, and then I buy it used for half of that. 🤣 🤣 🤣
Still I like new groundbreaking designs, which we have seen sometimes from Ferrari, but this is not one of them IMO.
This looks more like a way cheaper car, that could actually be in my price range.
Maybe it looks better in real life, but my experience is the opposite.
SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
on 30 May 13:27
nextcollapse
The thing is, others did manage to, and those are new companies without the massive budget Ferrari has. But with all those possibilities they chose to create a fast blue dumpster.
Okay, the car I posted isn’t exactly the same price tag, but it outperforms the Ferrari on more than just design.
You’re misunderstanding the term. Design language is subtle aesthetic cues, usually not functional, that remind you of other things they’ve made in the past. To suggest that the batteries dictate stuff like the shape of headlights doesn’t make sense.
Exactly, it looks somewhat like some of those cheap Japanese sports cars from the late 80’s. Except those were OK for the price and time.
turbowafflz@lemmy.world
on 30 May 12:34
nextcollapse
I drive a chevrolet bolt and I can definitely hear the motor when I’m accelerating fast. Honestly I think a loud electric motor sounds way cooler than a gas engine, especially when you think about the fact that the noise is coming out of something the size of a coffee can thats having 150 thousand watts dumped into it.
IDK how many HP yours have, ours is pretty modest by EV standards with only 204 HP, and I can’t really say for sure that I can hear the engine.
But we did buy a car that has very good sound proofing, but we can still hear the tires clearly. Still the quiet of the car makes it feel like a luxury car IMO. 👍 😎
On mine if I turn off the A/C and blower I can definitely hear it if I floor it.
SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
on 30 May 13:06
collapse
I enjoy it when I sit in the car, but only to a degree. And I hate it when others keep driving by my window, blasting me with their micro penis sound. Or when they scare my dogs. So if you 100% absolutely need it to be happy, let’s make a compromise and play an artificial sound inside of your own car. Oh, and please do the same with every fucking loud motorcycle.
And to Ferrari, if you want an outrageously cool car with electric motors, this is how you do it.
TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 30 May 11:49
nextcollapse
Without the vroom you have 50% less of micropenis compensation. Outrageous!
abbadon420@sh.itjust.works
on 30 May 11:49
nextcollapse
As a Dutchmen, that’s funny. The political party that has been ruling the country for the past 20 years, is very pro-car. We jokingly call them “the vroom vroom party”
erusuoyera@sh.itjust.works
on 30 May 12:03
nextcollapse
I genuinely think Ferrari deliberately designed a boring looking EV so they can say “See, our customers don’t want EV’s, let’s never do one again.”
For passionate enthusiasts, Ferraris are not merely cars but works of art…the sound of the engine revving evokes a sensation comparable to listening to the music of Giuseppe Verdi or Giacomo Puccini.
“I agree with him – the horse needs to be removed,” said Barone, adding that his main gripe was its lack of sound. “How can you have a Ferrari without any vroom?”
I suppose that someone could make a device that polls OBD-II for the current RPM and feeds more synthetic ICE engine sound into the sound system.
EDIT: Hell, if you’re freed from the constraints of an actual ICE engine, there’s probably some sort of sound that’s more psychologically-optimized to make the guy happy than whatever an actual engine puts out.
UndergroundParking@lemmy.cafe
on 30 May 12:19
nextcollapse
People who have loud cars and care about their cars being loud are some of the saddest people in existence. The only purpose is to shout at others about what an inconsiderate asshole they are. And to make them feel better about being such a sad small peened individual.
Be it old shitty cars with after market pipes, giant trucks designed to be as obnoxious as possible or “sports” cars only driven by dickheads who can’t drive for shit. I fucking hate them all.
UndergroundParking@lemmy.cafe
on 30 May 12:20
nextcollapse
I totally get it. Ferrari is a statement, not just a vehicle. This is silly.
It just feels wrong, like Ferrari is about being race car purests that also make race cars for the average driver. I know they’ve evolved/changed over years, but this feels wrong, like they went too far. Atleast Audi’s electric car still looks like a Audi. The price tag is insane for what you’re getting.
metermatic26@lemmy.world
on 30 May 12:37
nextcollapse
<img alt="image of a coffin connected to a spinning shaft of a generator connected to an electric car charging station connected to a car. the four parts are labeled “enzo ferrari”, “generator”, “electricity”, and “ferrari luce”" src="https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/985b630b-cb71-49d8-b1dd-7a647e04708c.png">
threaded - newest
True, EV’s are about things like value for money, quietness, reliability, lack of maintenance, all things expensive flashy cars detest and have no need for
It’s like making an economical artwork or cheap watch for a super rich person, what’s the point?
lack of maintenance? I don’t see why it would be the case or why it would need less maintenance than a gas(thermal?) cars
No oil changes at the very least. There are also around a zillion moving parts in a gas engine, most of which can wear.
You are not sure why EV’s need less maintenance? I don’t quite understand what you’re asking sorry
For the routine stuff: no engine oil to replace, no engine air filter, regenerative braking means you barely use the real brakes. Electric engines are also much simpler so there’s just less to go wrong and need fixing.
Yes, EVs come with a lot less maintenance and running costs. You’ll have to excuse the Facebook-quality image, but this does neatly sum up the main differences:
<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c9affab4-6cc3-4f17-8eb0-33ee72d26f3b.jpeg">
Oil changes, spark plugs, coolant, transmission fluid, and belts are all things I’ve had to maintain for my partner’s car in the past few years that my EV doesn’t need.
The Lotus Evija says you are completely full of shit.
I mean it has 8 cars sold, thanks for confirming what I said?
All the really awesome supercars are limited runs that aren’t even built until they are ordered. It’s almost about having a thing no one has. I showed you an electric one that flatly scoffed at your assertions and somehow you confabulated it into confirmation bias. You’ve lost the plot.
After getting an EV myself, the vroom is completely irrelevant IMO, I actually find the silent acceleration way cooler. 😎
The problem with the new Electric Ferrari is way more that the design is an uninteresting stereotype of an average small sportscar.
Agreed, there are some really cool ev hypercars out there and Ferrari could have done that and gotten positive responses, but instead they made the most boring looking car ever.
They should’ve just slapped a Fiat badge and a 60k price tag on it and it would have been interesting again.
In the other end of the scale we have the “Bat Mobil”
goodwood.com/…/the-ariel-hipercar-is-a-1000ps-nut…
<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/38c5b2bf-8886-4463-9874-1c2401911e6f.png">
It’s ugly, but at least it’s not boring. 🤣 🤣 🤣
Or the Yangwang U9 Extreme, maybe the fastest car in the world, looks amazing, and is an ev.
www.yangwangauto.com/en/car/u9-xtreme
I love taking off in my EV and doing a tight turn without walking up the whole neighborhood. But people who buy expensive sport cars mostly want to be seen and heard, they’re not doing this for the driving comfort. I found my drive in a Ferrari lacking in comfort.
How many Ferrari’s/Lamborghini/Supercars/Hypercars have you owned before?
I also prefer the faster take off at the lights but lets not pretend we’re the target market for Ferrari’s.
I think the principle is exactly the same, actually I think it’s even more cool in a super car. Because your acceleration is insane, but there is still almost no noise.
One of my neighbors have a pretty fast EV like zero to a hundred in less than 5 seconds. When he gives that car full pedal, it is absolutely awesome.
IMO a roaring ICE car is so outdated. For a more normal ICE car, it’s outright embarrassing, all that noise for nothing!
I know rich people tend to be narcissistic, so they may like the attention the noise makes, but generally they don’t like to be involuntary laughing stocks when they play with their expansive toys.
PS: Our car is pretty average for an EV, but still better than most ICE cars.
I love how we are on Lemmy, the poorest, rich people hating, communism wanting, most autistic place on the internet talking about what rich people want
Yes that’s right, however they’re not driving a normal ICE, they’re driving a ferrari or lamborghini, the ones with millions of views for people just to hear the sound:
www.youtube.com/results?search_query=lamborghini+…
4 Minutes of V12 Aventador SV Raw Audio [4K]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKkvlYi6JC0
2 million views 🤣
Yes
Nobody is laughing at a V12 Aventador or Ferrari F40, this is lemmy autism
They have used none of Ferrari’s “design language” for this car, it doesn’t look like a Ferrari.
I absolutely agree, it could maybe be argued that the new design is elegant, but my immediate impression was just uninteresting.
I would have believed this car was a Kia without a second thought if I saw it on the road with that badge. That’s not a compliment for either company, unfortunately.
Looks a lot like the recent Nissan Leaf. Slightly less bulky front and the leak has a solid black area at the front for the lights, but other than that almost the same look to the car.
The $30k leaf sticker price seems fair for this.
This was actually designed by Johnny Ives’ design studio. I don’t think they got the message that Ferrari was the customer.
Difficult to use the same design language with massive batteries. I actually think it looks okay. For me the issue is the 700k price tag.
Batteries that take up less space than a massive engine and gearbox?
batteries and inverters definitely take up more volume than an ice drivetrain. the advantage is that they can be put in more places than the mechanical linkages.
I'm pretty sure an ICE takes up more space, there's a lot more components to it. There's some very slim EV super cars. And yeah, way more flexibility with an EV system.
i’ve got a phev and lemme tell ya, those batteries are like three times the size (and weight) of the rest of the drivetrain combined, including fuel tank.
the bmw i3 rex is a pretty extreme example because it has a motorcycle engine, but they managed to cram the engine, inverter, gearbox and fuel tank into the space under the floor of the trunk, between the rear wheels, while the battery pack consists basically the bottom decimeter of the entire car. and that 9 liter tank doubles its range.
meanwhile the original chevy volt, a fwd car with an 1.6l i4, opted to keep the transmission tunnel and space where a rear axle would go to stuff them with batteries. really compromises the internal space, sacrifices a middle rear seat, and gives a whopping… 45km of electric range.
My point is simply that electric vs combustion power distribution and volume / mass differences make it, I assume, difficult to maintain the same design language.
Not at all, there's loads of fully electric super cars that look just how you would expect, sleeker even. This was a deliberate design decision from Ferrari.
I seem to be unclear I guess. But to me there is a difference between, “can’t use the same design language” and “can’t look sleek”.
Those batteries are a massive advantage for the design, they are put at the bottom like all other electric cars, and help keep the weigh center very low.
Engines and cooling also allow for much greater flexibility in design. But for some reason they decided to not use that greater design freedom to make an actual cool design, but more like if Tesla model 3 had a sports version with some body tuning.
The 700k price tag is not a problem for me, 500k or 700k doesn’t make any difference to me, I can’t afford either.
My price range is more like 60k, and then I buy it used for half of that. 🤣 🤣 🤣
Still I like new groundbreaking designs, which we have seen sometimes from Ferrari, but this is not one of them IMO.
This looks more like a way cheaper car, that could actually be in my price range.
Maybe it looks better in real life, but my experience is the opposite.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOcp3-Ik3G4
The thing is, others did manage to, and those are new companies without the massive budget Ferrari has. But with all those possibilities they chose to create a fast blue dumpster.
Okay, the car I posted isn’t exactly the same price tag, but it outperforms the Ferrari on more than just design.
You’re misunderstanding the term. Design language is subtle aesthetic cues, usually not functional, that remind you of other things they’ve made in the past. To suggest that the batteries dictate stuff like the shape of headlights doesn’t make sense.
Fair. I meant proportions/silhouette, not details like lights. I just mistakenly thought those were also part of design.
It’s a 50k design at best. Not worthy of the 650k price tag
Exactly, it looks somewhat like some of those cheap Japanese sports cars from the late 80’s. Except those were OK for the price and time.
I drive a chevrolet bolt and I can definitely hear the motor when I’m accelerating fast. Honestly I think a loud electric motor sounds way cooler than a gas engine, especially when you think about the fact that the noise is coming out of something the size of a coffee can thats having 150 thousand watts dumped into it.
IDK how many HP yours have, ours is pretty modest by EV standards with only 204 HP, and I can’t really say for sure that I can hear the engine.
But we did buy a car that has very good sound proofing, but we can still hear the tires clearly. Still the quiet of the car makes it feel like a luxury car IMO. 👍 😎
On mine if I turn off the A/C and blower I can definitely hear it if I floor it.
I enjoy it when I sit in the car, but only to a degree. And I hate it when others keep driving by my window, blasting me with their micro penis sound. Or when they scare my dogs. So if you 100% absolutely need it to be happy, let’s make a compromise and play an artificial sound inside of your own car. Oh, and please do the same with every fucking loud motorcycle.
And to Ferrari, if you want an outrageously cool car with electric motors, this is how you do it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JYp9eGC3Cc
This belongs in Nottheonion.
Without the vroom you have 50% less of micropenis compensation. Outrageous!
As a Dutchmen, that’s funny. The political party that has been ruling the country for the past 20 years, is very pro-car. We jokingly call them “the vroom vroom party”
I genuinely think Ferrari deliberately designed a boring looking EV so they can say “See, our customers don’t want EV’s, let’s never do one again.”
They wont have much choice when combustion engines are banned.
I love how conspiracy theorists always view companies as “perfect” so that even their failures are reclassified as having been done on purpose.
This wasn’t designed to appeal to their current customers. Apparently some people like bland EVs and Ferrari want some of that money.
I’m okay with the silent power, I am not okay with it looking like a minivan.
Carriages aren’t the same ever since they went without any horse dung.
I suppose that someone could make a device that polls OBD-II for the current RPM and feeds more synthetic ICE engine sound into the sound system.
EDIT: Hell, if you’re freed from the constraints of an actual ICE engine, there’s probably some sort of sound that’s more psychologically-optimized to make the guy happy than whatever an actual engine puts out.
That’s a factory feature nowadays
Yeah, they mention it in the article, but I figure that whatever this guy wants, it’s more than whatever they’re generating.
I believe they’ve actually added noise components to the driving axle so it’s a mechanically produced sound even, which is pretty cool imo.
www.engine-sim.parts
BMW did that and everyone hated it.
People don’t want synthetic sounds, they want the real thing.
Of course. If you can't be loud and obnoxious, you can't compensate for the fact you have a tiny penis.
Which I wish they'd quit because they're giving the rest of us with tiny penises a bad name.
<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/9d17462a-383c-44cc-8101-ca4de97fc3f4.jpeg">
People who have loud cars and care about their cars being loud are some of the saddest people in existence. The only purpose is to shout at others about what an inconsiderate asshole they are. And to make them feel better about being such a sad small peened individual.
Be it old shitty cars with after market pipes, giant trucks designed to be as obnoxious as possible or “sports” cars only driven by dickheads who can’t drive for shit. I fucking hate them all.
I totally get it. Ferrari is a statement, not just a vehicle. This is silly.
It just feels wrong, like Ferrari is about being race car purests that also make race cars for the average driver. I know they’ve evolved/changed over years, but this feels wrong, like they went too far. Atleast Audi’s electric car still looks like a Audi. The price tag is insane for what you’re getting.
Haters gonna hate. Imo, the Hyundai Testarossa looks absolutely gorgeous 🚙
<img alt="image of a coffin connected to a spinning shaft of a generator connected to an electric car charging station connected to a car. the four parts are labeled “enzo ferrari”, “generator”, “electricity”, and “ferrari luce”" src="https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/985b630b-cb71-49d8-b1dd-7a647e04708c.png">