World Leaders From China to EU Hold Climate Meeting Without US
(www.bloomberg.com)
from silence7@slrpnk.net to world@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 20:45
https://slrpnk.net/post/21233454
from silence7@slrpnk.net to world@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 20:45
https://slrpnk.net/post/21233454
China’s Xi Jinping and the EU’s Ursula von der Leyen were among the leaders on a private video call organized by the United Nations.
#world
threaded - newest
That article is very light on detail. I wanted to know if my government was represented, but the article doesn’t even show a list of all the countries participating.
Isn’t Bloomberg supposed to be the source of reliable global business information that’s informing the business leaders of the world, or is this just another random journalism by billionaire outfit?
This was the most complete list I could find.
President Xi Jinping of China
President Emmanuel Macron of France
President William Samoei Ruto of Kenya
Prime Minister Hilda Heine of the Marshall Islands
African Union, chaired by President João Lourenço of Angola
the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and its chair, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim of Malaysia
the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS), chaired by President Surangel Whipps Jr. of the Republic of Palau
the Caribbean Community (CARICOM), chaired by Prime Minister Mia Mottley of Barbados.
ipsnews.net/…/un-chief-brazil-gather-world-leader…
And two more more from another source.
UN Secretary-General António Guterres
Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva
news.un.org/en/story/2025/04/1162516
Thank you.
Glad to help. :)
That’s rich coming from China. They have never supported or even participated in the rules based order. From IP theft, to secret police stations in foreign countries, human rights abuses etc…
And yet, there’s nothing inaccurate in his statement.
The rules based order has always been a farce. Doesn't excuse the evil shit they do, but let's not pretend the West was respecting the rules it set up.
But the question is, is he wrong here?
Wrong in the sense that they have been doing everything they accuse the US of doing for decades.
That you can make such grossly hypocritical statements publicly means you aren’t serious about anything.
At this point you could literally be talking about the US with this sentence.
What do you mean? 'Murica doesn't use anything uncouth as foreign police stations; they only have sparkling extradition treaties and Interpol! Don't put The Leaders of the Free World™ with the barbaric Chinese!
/s obviously screw them both.
Our last standing differentiator was IP law, until we got weapons of mass IP destruction in the form of AI companies and LLMs.
And? Do you you think multiple countries can’t be major issues?
He’s pointing out that they’re the pot calling the kettle black
No, the pot and kettle can both be black, that’s the entire point of the expression.
Your statement is missing the point, then.
No it isn’t. You were trying to cast China in a harsher light for doing “for decades” most of the same things the US has been doing (also mostly for decades).
Everyone sucks in this situation.
The US has been a petro-state for over a decade. Can’t imagine what they could bring to the table at this point. Probably the most effective policy towards the US is the same one applied to Iran or Cuba.
Good. Trump is not who you want at a climate meeting.
At any meeting really
At all, maybe?
I wonder if he would have wanted to be at that meeting
Of course, but only because he wasnt invited.
archive.is/rphNl
It’s a gift link. Folks with Javascript enabled just get the article without needing that.
Actually, judging by its actions, the US has not abandoned climate action. It’s the only way I can explain why it is planning the collapse of its own economy.