Argentina Monthly Inflation Slowed More Than Expected in March
(www.bloomberg.com)
from Shardikprime@lemmy.world to world@lemmy.world on 18 Apr 2024 03:51
https://lemmy.world/post/14417054
from Shardikprime@lemmy.world to world@lemmy.world on 18 Apr 2024 03:51
https://lemmy.world/post/14417054
Argentina keeps dropping the inflation numbers, good news for the country!
#world
threaded - newest
Economic stagnation is not preferable to inflation. It’ll take a while to see how CoL responds to this but my fear is that these changes will drive down effective purchasing power.
In a normal economy, balancing growth versus inflation is certainly an important issue. But when an economy is undergoing hyperinflation, getting that under control has to be priority number one.
Keynes, for example, wrote eloquently about this a century ago. Some of his passages apply quite eerily to the case of Argentina:
Um it kinda is.
The central bank will absolutely put the country into a recession to stop inflation. That’s usually why central banks aren’t controlled by the government in power, because the government in power can impact things to improve their situation at the expense of the country.
Too much inflation is bad. Inflation that Argentina has, that’s a whole other level, that’s a potential country killer.
Only if inflation is the only metric of concern, but a stalled economy with low inflation and massive unemployment is not a healthy situation. Austerity does not tend to foster economic growth and I worry they’ve decided to focus solely on one of their problems. Hopefully it’s actual improvement.
I mean, that's precisely the point. Growth isn't really the priority right now, because that also tends to increase inflation. The loose aim of Milei's plan is to return things to an actually accurate economic baseline by cutting extremely distortionary government spending and subsidies and allowing the peso to fall to its true actual value, and only then pivoting to focus on real and sustainable growth that's actually backed by legitimate increases in efficiency and production rather than government money printers and IMF loans that only make the problem worse.
I won't pretend that this approach doesn't have some harsh consequences on people that will be disproportionately born by the poor or that there aren't any other options, but there is a legitimate economic basis for the idea. Whether it's worth it or is fair and just is another question.
Exactly, stop the runaway inflation. Small inflation is good, stops the hoarding of capital, but runaway inflation just destroys capital. Usually an independent central bank aims for 3-6% inflation to bring stability to a country, and stability leads to prosperity
This is like that article published recently about the IMF predicting the Russian economy will grow most out of all developed countries. It’s because of war production, which is neither real nor useful economic growth, and only short-term.
Argentina’s inflation is down because demand has been decimated i.e. increased poverty, and people who were recently middle class now don’t even have a mailing address.
Housing and worker rights are very strong in Argentina. They have an address but no food or electricity.
So basically, inflation was around 10% monthly with previous government. This one took it to 25%, destroyed salaries, increased unemployment and poverty, stopped education, science and health spending, and somehow, it’s good news that is still higher than before?
211% anual with last government. That’s not even close to 10% monthly. Try almost 18%
150% annual predicted with this one
211>150
Ergo inflation down
You don’t get to count last December inflation as last government’s. Did you forgot that the idiot cheered the value, saying that he “avoided a hyperinflation of 16.000%”? Last year was between 100% and 150%, this year will be way more than that. I know you may not like it, but that’s the truth. Sorry kid.