Inside Iran’s protests: ‘Either we overthrow the regime, or we are destroyed. We have nothing left to lose.’ (www.independent.co.uk)
from throws_lemy@reddthat.com to world@lemmy.world on 17 Jan 2026 11:15
https://reddthat.com/post/58344295

#world

threaded - newest

NewDark@lemmings.world on 17 Jan 2026 11:47 next collapse

Nah, you can be the next Syria, or have an American puppet in place to syphon off the country’s wealth.

belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 17 Jan 2026 19:52 collapse

So let’s just keep the Mullahs, at least then the country’s wealth is siphoned off to individuals with Iranian Passes.

NewDark@lemmings.world on 18 Jan 2026 09:38 collapse

I would love it if the Iranians had another revolution on their terms. However, you’re naive as hell if you think that would happen without western meddling. It’s already the root cause for most of the material conditions that cause these grievances.

Sanctions isolate Iran and actively hurt the common people. Israel and the US are constantly threatening, attacking, and doing espionage meaning the government is in constant threat and has to be more authoritarian to survive. The whole reason for the revolution was the people getting pissed at the Shah, our western puppet from before.

This has been a decades long project that you are being suckered into cheering for.

belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 18 Jan 2026 10:00 next collapse

I’ve been suckered into this by knowing Iranians who don’t want to live under the Mullahs any more.

And western meddling did not force the IRI to enact a brutal gender apartheid while also effectively putting Persian Iranians above all other ethnicities. Western meddling did not force the IRI to beat Mahsa Amini to death.

The Regime is under constant threat? Good. They should be.

clot27@lemmy.zip on 18 Jan 2026 18:10 next collapse

I’ve been suckered into this by knowing Iranians who don’t want to live under the Mullahs any more.

Who told you? mullahs still enjoy significant support

belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 18 Jan 2026 19:20 next collapse

Family of ex partner still living Iran.

incompetent@programming.dev on 19 Jan 2026 01:23 collapse

mullahs still enjoy significant support

Who told you?

NewDark@lemmings.world on 18 Jan 2026 18:53 collapse

Is Iraq better off now without Sadam? Is Syria better off now without Bashar? Is Libya better off now without Gadafi?

I don’t like any of those previous leaders, but every single case the country was worse off after. The same will be true of Iran.

nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz on 18 Jan 2026 19:11 collapse

Syria is definetly better off without Bashar

NewDark@lemmings.world on 19 Jan 2026 02:25 collapse

You think it’s better off in the hands of a former Isis guy where they’re murdering Druze and other ethnic minorities while Israel has basically free reign to bomb, displace, and take land? It hasn’t become more stable after the fall brother.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 19 Jan 2026 08:04 collapse

pissed at the shah was understatement, he was extremely brutal throughout his rule.

Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus on 17 Jan 2026 12:14 next collapse

This is the first time Trump could actually do something meaningful to improve something in the world. I wouldn’t hold my breath.

gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works on 17 Jan 2026 13:58 next collapse

He’ll absolutely find a way to fuck it up into some sort of humanitarian catastrophe, make money off of it, and push the average opinion that Iranian people have of America even lower.

frongt@lemmy.zip on 17 Jan 2026 14:49 collapse

He couldn’t even fuck up covid into a scam. Like imagine making Trump brand face masks. They would have sold like hotcakes.

corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca on 17 Jan 2026 18:17 collapse

imagine making Trump brand face masks. They would have sold like hotcakes.

They did, but they weren’t a Trump-launched thing. There’s a correlation there.

buzzfeednews.com/…/etsy-trump-face-masks-coronavi…

hector@lemmy.today on 17 Jan 2026 14:39 next collapse

You think starting a second Iran War is “meaningful?” Wow.

Ironic you no doubt lament and scorn the right for falling for propaganda.

CannonFodder@lemmy.world on 17 Jan 2026 15:14 next collapse

Well it certainly would have meaning. Not likely a good outcome, of course.
Ideally we could support the protesters/rebels somehow. The idea of threatening US military action is to put more pressure on the Iranian regime with the hope that they’ll collapse and run away. Won’t work tho because they’re religious / ideological and will fight to their deaths.

hector@lemmy.today on 17 Jan 2026 15:24 next collapse

No it won’t work to unseat the regime. They are still at war right now with the US for all intents and purposes, and as such are in a rally around the flag situation.

It will work for the US and israel to restart hostilities with Iran however. Then Israel can distract issues and delay elections, and not admit their leaders made mistakes, for a while longer. In the US it’s Israel First as always.

Gates9@sh.itjust.works on 17 Jan 2026 15:37 collapse

We could call it “Operation Ajax Part II: The Stupiding”

Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus on 17 Jan 2026 15:28 collapse

I’d say the current situation in Iran is comparable to civil war; support for the rebels would probably help speed up things and reduce deaths on their side.

hector@lemmy.today on 17 Jan 2026 15:44 next collapse

The only war is the ongoing one with Israel and the US and Iran and their allies. I suspect your media and sources of information are doing you a disservice if you see things like that.

Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus on 17 Jan 2026 16:01 collapse

Be honest, do you see the theocratical regime in Iran as a positive thing? Iran under the Shah was pretty progressive and actually gave a shit about basic human rights, something you can’t say about Iran today.

thoro@lemmy.ml on 17 Jan 2026 16:11 next collapse

Yeah the basic human rights of BP to have access to Iran’s resources

hector@lemmy.today on 17 Jan 2026 16:38 collapse

The Shah was incredibly repressive. Infamous secret police. The ruling class had some rights, got their pictures taken smiling.

This is all just trying to restart the war and you are going along with it, why? Because you believe them? That the shah was great, that the protests can topple the regime here?

Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus on 17 Jan 2026 19:21 collapse

You didn’t answer my question. Do you approve of the current status of Iran as a theocratical-military dictatorship?

hector@lemmy.today on 17 Jan 2026 19:26 collapse

I have no say in the government of Iran. The only thing we have a say in is if we give the worst people in the world cause to war against them more. You don’t either. Iran government mean, US/Israel Warring good, is your logic here.

As if that would help anything, it would make it worse. But helping isn’t the point, distracting the public for israel is.

Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus on 17 Jan 2026 20:11 collapse

I didn’t ask if you have a say in the Iranian government. I asked you a very simple yes or no question. You evading to answer speaks for itself. I have nothing more to discuss with the likes of you.

hector@lemmy.today on 17 Jan 2026 20:22 collapse

You don’t have a say in who leads Iran either. You do have a say in if we go to war with them again, and make everything worse. Worse for their protesters, worse for all of their citizens. Does not help anyone in the west either.

You want more war to make everything worse, and breed instability that will give endless cause for provokations and new strikes across the borders, everytime Israel needs a public relations boost they can pop over and bomb some stuff, safe knowing that Iran can’t hit them back effectively if at all.

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2026 01:19 collapse

I disagree with the great Satan, but I believe all his lies

RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world on 17 Jan 2026 21:05 collapse

As much as I hate the tankies that love the IRCG because they are too dumb to understand that two things can be bad.

I think western meddling would also be bad, so far Mosad has taken responsibility ISIS style (it’s a win-win for them, the more paranoid and brutal Iran act the better they look)

DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com on 17 Jan 2026 14:39 next collapse

So Iran is gonna defederate?

hector@lemmy.today on 17 Jan 2026 14:43 next collapse

The US and company fomented the unrest to the best of their ability you can be sure. Coming on the heels of a bad faith war with Israel and the US that Iran was powerless to respond to, having to be humiliated and have nothing of substance to return with, these protests will be ruthlessly crushed as Iran rallies around the flag.

The protests are associated with the US. Even before the president talked about it. The US is doing all it can to exacerbate them too.

Celebrating this is naive, this is just more cause for war being manufactured so Israel can postpone elections longer, and associated bullshit in the US’ Israel First policy.

arrow74@lemmy.zip on 17 Jan 2026 16:44 next collapse

Yeah it’s better to have a legal code that allows women to be stoned. Obviously there’s no way anyone in that country could ever not want that. Must be the US

hector@lemmy.today on 17 Jan 2026 17:55 next collapse

You are so worried about human rights when it’s a US military target, funny how that works.

Because their government is bad, then it’s totally ok to go to war with them and try to get a different bad government. Our government has such a good track record setting up puppet regimes too, what in Iraq and Afghanistan.

arrow74@lemmy.zip on 17 Jan 2026 18:02 collapse

Suddenly you know everything about me?

Do you truly believe I only care because it’s a “US military target”?

Because their government is bad, then it’s totally ok to go to war with them and try to get a different bad government

Never said that either. It’s also a statement I’m fundamentally against.

It’s also equally true that the government of Iran is oppressive.

Both of these can be true.

hector@lemmy.today on 17 Jan 2026 18:11 collapse

Sure sounded like you were endorsing military action, endorsing the worst people on the planet, and the most hated in the region, to bomb them some more, maybe assassinate some of their leaders. Because they are mean.

You think the US getting involved militarily is going to help?

arrow74@lemmy.zip on 17 Jan 2026 18:13 collapse

You think the US getting involved militarily is going to help?

Never said that, nor does this article. Actually if you are done trying to make an argument I said just the opposite

[deleted] on 17 Jan 2026 18:29 next collapse
.
hector@lemmy.today on 17 Jan 2026 18:44 collapse

I did go back over your comments, and you are full of shit. You are whipping up cause for war you lied to me.

arrow74@lemmy.zip on 17 Jan 2026 18:56 collapse

What the hell are you talking about? Every comment I made is anti-intervetion.

I do hope the people of Iran overthrow their government. It’s terribly repressive.

I do not want to US or any outside power to get involved.

stickly@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2026 17:27 collapse

Dude is so high on tankie juice that he’s hallucinating arguments

corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca on 17 Jan 2026 18:15 next collapse

Yeah it’s better to have a legal code that allows women to be stoned.

If it’s a binary choice, remind me what they have now that’s better.

clot27@lemmy.zip on 18 Jan 2026 18:12 collapse

do you know these protests arent about women rights but economic condition? which is worse due to unfair sanctions by the fascist state of amrikkka?

Godric@lemmy.world on 17 Jan 2026 18:19 next collapse

Iran powerless even after the terrorist orgs they bankroll went wonky? Tell that to the unarmed civilians they shot in the fucking face.

You’re a disgusting anti-human ghoul, shilling for tyrants and murders.

hector@lemmy.today on 17 Jan 2026 18:27 collapse

Yes not giving the US and Israel cause for more Iran war is “disgusting,” great point. That is the quality of conversation I have come to expect from the mechanized troll legions and their carpet bombing of social media campaigns with diarrhea shit.

It works on some people, the weak minded.

Godric@lemmy.world on 17 Jan 2026 18:59 collapse

Why do you consider rape, murder, and maiming as state policy as an acceptable way to terrorize the Iranian people for protesting?

hector@lemmy.today on 17 Jan 2026 19:03 collapse

Israel rapes kills and murders. You want to give them cause to wreck havoc in Iran.

Godric@lemmy.world on 17 Jan 2026 19:10 next collapse

Because Isreal has acted evilly, that justifies the Iranian government shooting their citizens in the face for protesting?

hector@lemmy.today on 17 Jan 2026 19:14 collapse

Your logic would not fool a child. Because Iran bad let worse Israel and US people make it worse. War mongers do not make very good arguments, just repeat them aggressively, and are backed up by the government running legions of trolls and bots and using their corrupt influence to make it seem like those war mongering justifications are accepted by people.

No to Iran War 2. Spin that.

Godric@lemmy.world on 17 Jan 2026 19:47 collapse

The only people shooting Iranians today is the Iranian government, your attempts to deflect aren’t working. Why is Iran murdering and maiming protesters justified to you?

hector@lemmy.today on 17 Jan 2026 20:19 collapse

You are trying to trick people into thinking that flawed logic is something shared by a lot of people, and it’s not. You could justify going to war with any country with your logic. Government bad, therefore war with them good. Brilliant truly. But it’s not about making good arguments is it? It’s about making it seem like people think like that to influence them, and it’s about bullying people into not challenging your arguments made on behalf of the US and Israel to justify more war.

Godric@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2026 16:38 collapse

You depress me. People are being tortured and murdered by their dictator for protesting, and you’re justifying the active, tangible evil with a theoretical war. Go outside and hug a person please :(

[deleted] on 18 Jan 2026 16:44 collapse
.
belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 18 Jan 2026 11:17 collapse

Iran rapes, kills and murders.

hector@lemmy.today on 18 Jan 2026 11:30 collapse

Israel rapes, murders, shunts millions of others into ghettos and tries to final solution them all, while lashing out at their powerless neighbors with absolute military and intelligenc superiority, under false pretenses. Then schemes to keep lashing out after international pressure forced them to put their fhetto reprisals and bad neighborism back on simmer.

Which is where we are. Restarting bad faith war between an advanced military with unlimited funds and a rudimentary military with limited funds.

You are going to get those protesters hurt with your cassus belli here.

belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 18 Jan 2026 17:15 collapse

I dont want a war. I dont want military intervention. I just want these protestors to succeed. I know some of them. They should not have to live under the IRI anymore.

hector@lemmy.today on 18 Jan 2026 17:32 collapse

As I’ve explained ad nauseum, the only way for that to happen is for the democratic establishment to be replaced with agressive popular reformists.

incompetent@programming.dev on 19 Jan 2026 03:18 collapse

As I’ve explained ad nauseum, the only way for that to happen is for the democratic establishment to be replaced with agressive popular reformists.

Have you ever considered that you might be wrong? The only way? Seems a bit closed minded to think that way.

hector@lemmy.today on 19 Jan 2026 09:22 collapse

Your username checks out. That you would question undeniable fact discounts everything you have to say.

We cannot trust you, too misguided, or a cynically manipulator of the well intentioned.

Aljernon@lemmy.today on 18 Jan 2026 09:52 collapse

I doubt it. The US has very little power to foment anything there. Mossad has assets in Iran but limited assets that they use sparingly. This was almost certainly an organic grassroots revolution. Now, I’d for sure agree that Mossad and the US are doing anything in their power to move things along.

hector@lemmy.today on 18 Jan 2026 10:44 collapse

They are doing a lot you can be sure. From sabotaging their economy every way they can, to funding any seperatists, paying informants and tools for things, smuggling and setting up clandestine internet/communication networks, tor onion beaming signals between devices and over power lines and othr such clandestine ways with encrpytion. To sponsoring agent provokareurs at demonstrations. To egging on security services and protests to violence.

All while exagerating the size and support of protests, minimizing the support and position of the regime, and exagerating the scale of crackdowns.

All while tricking security services into attacking their people and vice versa, from a position of near total compromise of electronics.

You are quite mistaken as to how deeply we are involved in fomenting unrest.

Ilixtze@lemmy.ml on 17 Jan 2026 15:25 next collapse

Is that a quote from a courageous mossad agent?

_Nico198X_@europe.pub on 17 Jan 2026 15:36 collapse

tyrannical theocracy is bad, mmkay?

Ilixtze@lemmy.ml on 17 Jan 2026 16:00 collapse

By the same logic, someone should bomb strike and kill thousands doing a regime change in the tyrannical theocracy of america, their totalitarian fascism affects me more personally than Iran’s

_Nico198X_@europe.pub on 17 Jan 2026 16:32 next collapse

“logic.”

go revolt like the courageous ppl of Iran.

Ilixtze@lemmy.ml on 17 Jan 2026 16:38 collapse

Unlike the propagandized people in the imperial core, i don’t endorse foreign bloody intervention of evil empires, even if america deserves it. ;)

They will do it to themselves anyway. The war machine folds inwards.

_Nico198X_@europe.pub on 17 Jan 2026 17:35 collapse

sure, Jan.

corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca on 17 Jan 2026 18:14 collapse

tyrannical theocracy is bad, mmkay?

By the same logic, someone should bomb strike and kill thousands doing a regime change in the tyrannical theocracy of america

America does appear to be waxing both tyrannical and theocratic; and people could be dying from the effects of being the ‘out’ group in that environment. You may have a strong point here.

I’m hoping for secession .

arrow74@lemmy.zip on 17 Jan 2026 16:40 next collapse

I never thought I’d see Lemmy so desperately supporting a theocratic dictatorship that allows women to be stoned to death for minor “offenses” to their archaic code, but here we are.

Gates9@sh.itjust.works on 17 Jan 2026 18:02 next collapse

Please. Opposing intervention is not the same as “supporting the regime”. By the way, how did that theocratic dictatorship come to be?

And finally:

truthout.org/…/us-provides-military-assistance-to…

arrow74@lemmy.zip on 17 Jan 2026 18:10 collapse

This is a garbage gotcha because you assume that I support the US policy of intervention.

I can both acknowledge that the current regime in Iran is a theocratic dictatorship and that the US has no buisness intervening.

I am equally capable of disliking the regime in Iran and the US.

If the regime falls this is great. If the US intervenes and forcibly topples the regime this is bad. As we’ve seen historically that leads to failure.

Maybe don’t support a regime that allows for raped women to be murdered?

Gates9@sh.itjust.works on 17 Jan 2026 18:26 next collapse

That’s all good and well but the fact of the matter is that the U.S. and western allies are intervening, and we have intervened continuously since we overthrew their secular democratic government in 1953. Since the Islamic Revolution overthrew our puppet regime in 1979, we have crippled their economy with sanctions, assassinated leaders and civilian scientists, and bombed their country. Even if you believe these revolts are 100% organic, manifesting spontaneously with no assistance or encouragement from Mossad, CIA, etc (doubtful), the context is that the people have already been victimized and pushed to the brink by western powers as much as their own government. That is context that simply cannot be ignored, particularly since this looks a lot like 1953.

arrow74@lemmy.zip on 17 Jan 2026 18:37 collapse

Even if you believe these revolts are 100% organic, manifesting spontaneously with no assistance or encouragement from Mossad, CIA, etc

So do you any proof of that or are you just really really sure that’s true?

the context is that the people have already been victimized and pushed to the brink by western powers as much as their own government

And? Does this mean there’s no possible way that these people are capable of not wanting to live under a theocratic dictatorship? Are you trying to imply they can’t make that decision on their own? If so that’s infantalizing and patronizing an entire group of people.

Or are you suggesting that the whole reason that this oppressive regime is in charge is because of the US? Because that is entirely true. You’ll get no disagreement from me.

Also why are you wasting your time monologing on all the terrible things the west have done to the middle east and Iran? You’ll get no disagreement from me. These were all bad actions. I don’t see how that justifys a theocratic dictatorship that brutalizes its own population.

You can be anti-western intervention and anti-dictatorship. Actually based on your own source you so kindly provided these are one in the same. As your source said 73% of dictatorships are propped up by the US.

belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 17 Jan 2026 19:47 next collapse

Nono, the Iranian people must please stay quiet and just accept their theocratic overlords, you see. They really don’t like the US, so we must kiss their ass.

0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 18 Jan 2026 04:03 collapse

There’s also a big push by these people from any retaliation in the US saying it’s “exactly what he wants”.

Stay quite and let dictators do what they like. That’s the go to for dictatorship to continue.

DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com on 18 Jan 2026 10:23 next collapse

Here’s a source, they explains it well, and better than I could www.youtube.com/watch?v=4T5adNE0bMU

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2026 01:16 collapse

Mossad LITERALLY tweeted that they are on the ground with the protestors. Also, did you forget history? No not decades ago, last fucking year, Mossad was in Iran, in Tehran, with entire buildings kitted out with drones and munitions and recon and comms gear, coordinating and killing.

Yes there’s oodles of evidence that Israel is literally on the ground in Iran right now attempting to overthrow the government, kill top officials, and disable defenses. What is wrong with your news consumption that you do not know this?

hector@lemmy.today on 17 Jan 2026 18:41 next collapse

It is probably chatbots making these dumbass ad hominem arguments.

Yes same with Venezuela, regime bad, therefore war good, opposing war bad. As they are advocating for the worst people in the world to use military force.

clot27@lemmy.zip on 18 Jan 2026 18:09 collapse

but be real, do you see any other alternative?

  1. Regime continues, becomes even more brutal to suppress dissent
  2. US interferes and starts a brutal civil war

Be real, there is no revolutionary movement to occupy the power gap, wishful thinking can only get you so far

corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca on 17 Jan 2026 18:07 next collapse

I never thought

Jury’s out on that.

Lemmy so desperately

[ citation needed ]

I don’t see Lemmy ‘desperate’ for anything.

supporting

[citation needed]

I do not see Lemmy ‘supporting’ anything.

arrow74@lemmy.zip on 17 Jan 2026 18:10 collapse

You can be my first citation

corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca on 17 Jan 2026 18:11 collapse

So we agree you may not know how to cite a valid source.

wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz on 18 Jan 2026 17:07 collapse

Dude, there’s not gonna be a peer-reviewed article on comment sentiments in lemmy comments. Just look at the fucking thread and see for yourself

gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de on 19 Jan 2026 02:51 collapse

there’s not gonna be a peer-reviewed article on comment sentiments in lemmy comments

or is there?

wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz on 19 Jan 2026 15:18 collapse

You can write one, I’m sure you can get it published in a sociology journal as long as you pepper it with enough sideways jabs at “white men” as an abstract entity.

blackris@discuss.tchncs.de on 17 Jan 2026 18:12 next collapse

Yeah, got a comment removed as „islamophobic“, calling the regime islamofascists, while at the same time rooting for the people of Iran. Some people cannot comprehend, that the enemy of my enemy is sometimes just another dictatorial regime full of assholes.

AzuranAurora@piefed.ca on 17 Jan 2026 18:27 next collapse

For a lot of people on here, tankies especially, anyone that opposes the West is incapable of doing harm and must be defended at all costs. Human rights abuses are ignored so long as they can go “west bad”. Like, yes, the West is indeed bad. That doesn’t excuse the awful actions of the regimes that oppose them nor make it okay.

Woht24@lemmy.world on 17 Jan 2026 21:19 next collapse

From where I’m sitting, pretty much everyone in power is fucked.

cmbabul@lemmy.world on 17 Jan 2026 21:33 next collapse

Power and authority are the big root problems

AzuranAurora@piefed.ca on 18 Jan 2026 01:07 collapse

Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. A tale as old as humanity itself.

FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2026 04:35 collapse

Similarly, money is not the root of evil. Desire to get it no matter what, is.

wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz on 18 Jan 2026 17:03 next collapse

You’re forgetting that nuance is forbidden. Anyone with a nuanced point of view is obviously a fascist sympathizer /s

Just kidding, fascists and tankies alike have no concept of nuance. They’re cut from the same cloth…

clot27@lemmy.zip on 18 Jan 2026 18:05 collapse

very convenient to label anyone as tankie who is against liberal zionists. No is excusing wrong doings of the iranian govt, however we need to be real here, western regime changes have never been good and particularly how this is openly israel backed is even more problematic. Not to forget govt still has support in iran and in case of regime change it would lead to catastrophic civil war - surely that wont liberate women. I dont support religious theocracy but we need to deal with reality, what happened to the “lesser of two evils” you liberals yap about all the time?

fort_burp@feddit.nl on 18 Jan 2026 18:21 next collapse

Wait didn’t we get women’s rights in Afghanistan after bombing them for 20 years? Ah nevermind, I already moved on to the next big issue.

Saapas@piefed.zip on 18 Jan 2026 19:10 collapse

It sounds like you are against the protesters, which in reality is supporting the government…

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2026 01:11 next collapse

Yes. Supporting the government is in reality opposing Zionism. I know it’s hard logic, but bear with me.

There is no alternative to the current government of Iran that is capable of organizing the military to defend against the US and Israel.

If the current government were to fall, the military would have a two-way fight that they would need to navigate, splitting their focus and creating mass paranoia.

It would be almost impossible to tell the difference between a legit revolution and a CIA color revolution, of which we have documented evidence.

So, if you oppose Zionism you must support the Iranian government, and if you support the Iranian people overthrowing their government TODAY then you support Zionism.

But you can be smarter than that and be like the rest of us who want the Iranian people to overthrow their government and since we want that the only way we can support them is by ending the threats from Israel and the US and Britain. If we can end the threats, then the Iranian people will have the safety to manage their own affairs.

Today, they are under siege and must not lose at all costs.

Saapas@piefed.zip on 19 Jan 2026 07:26 collapse

I say if Iranian people want to overthrow the current system then I’m all for it, rooting for the status quo against their will “for the greater good” sounds fucked up to me. Iranian people should be the one deciding the outcome here.

clot27@lemmy.zip on 19 Jan 2026 09:56 next collapse

Each one if us want that, but at this moment it is not likely

Saapas@piefed.zip on 19 Jan 2026 10:02 collapse

I mean we’ll see if they manage to overthrow it or not. If enough people there want it, even the brutal tactics of the current government aren’t enough to stop it.

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2026 13:34 collapse

It’s not possible for the people of Iran to decide the outcome. That’s what you’re ignoring. If Iran was completely disconnected from this plane of existence, sure, do it.

But Mossad is literally operating inside Iran and has been for years. During the attempted decapitation attack last year, when Israel shot missiles from fighter jets into apartments of top scientists and politicians, it was also discovered that Mossad was operating entire buildings as forward bases, with large amounts of drones, munitions, and recon capabilities.

Yes, it would be great for the people of Iran to decide, but it would require them to weaken the control and capabilities of the state, which woul guarantee Israeli and US involvement immediately.

The reason the Iranian people are not able to change their government is because they are under siege.

Saapas@piefed.zip on 19 Jan 2026 13:45 collapse

Iranian people are opposing the current government and Israel and US are benefiting from that, it doesn’t mean the Iranese will doesn’t exist or that they’re somehow subjugated or acting in orders by Israel and US. Suggesting that is frankly a bit offensive towards those protesting.

If you’re looking for some pure revolution where there aren’t any outside forces supporting the revolutionaries or benefiting from their actions, I don’t think such revolution has happened in modern times.

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2026 14:40 next collapse

That’s not the point at all. The Iranian people obviously have grievances. They have obviously protested before.

The point I am making is that it’s literally not possible for the Iranian masses to defend themselves against Israel and the US if they undermine their government’s security forces. The will of the people will be subjugated and instead of the Iranian people deciding how to run their country, the US will be deciding, just like last time when the US coup’ed Iran and determined how they would run the country.

The argument is not and has never been that each protestor is delusional and doesn’t have real grievance and is instead brainwashed and controlled by Israel. The argument is that attempting to overthrow the Iranian government does NOT lead to national self determination but will lead to national subjugation by the US.

Saapas@piefed.zip on 19 Jan 2026 14:55 collapse

I’d say let Iranian people decide if they want to go for it or not, instead of supporting a brutal theocracy because you feel like it’s for the “greater good”. If Iranians want to go for it, I support it.

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2026 15:16 collapse

Again, we’re not talking about supporting the greater good here. We’re talking about Iranian people being subjugated by the the US and Israel. You can’t just say “well let’s see what the people choose” when Mossad is literally on the streets killing people. You’re not understanding the situation.

The government is fighting against foreign intervention and an attempt at rerunning the color revolution playbook of the CIA and NED. The government will fight back. You don’t get to ask the government to lie down and die in the face of foreign adversaries, it has a responsibility to stop that from happening.

The Iranian people are very clear that they do not want the US or Israel to intervene. They came out and protestrd Israel in huge numbers during the attacks against Iran.

Additionally, the news media is walking back their reports of mass killings. Last week it was 12,000. This week it’s 1,200 with 5,000 being in investigated. Coroners reports are coming back with hundreds of victims dying of stabbing wounds, which indicates they weren’t murdered by state police forces firing into crowds but rather were murdered by the crowds themselves.

Saapas@piefed.zip on 19 Jan 2026 15:36 collapse

You’re dismissing the people’s actual will and their own measure of the situation because of your own beliefs. And you’re making the protesters out to be some foreign actors or foreign invasion. You’re taking agency away from them and presenting them as some sort of puppets.

Mossad is literally on the streets killing people. You’re not understanding the situation.

The government is fighting against foreign intervention and an attempt at rerunning the color revolution playbook of the CIA and NED.

Quite handy for the government to dismiss the protests like that. Every single time there’s an attempted popular uprising it’s just foreign actors and whatnot, not actual popular will.

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2026 16:28 collapse

www.jpost.com/middle-east/…/article-881733

This has nothing to do with the government dismissing the protests. Mossad is literally stating they are on the ground. Remember that they were also on the ground with a persistent presence during the attempted decapitation attacks last year. It’s not like the Iranian government is just making shit up about active Israeli attacks.

And it’s not like their making shit up about US CIA interference either. The major “human rights organizations” that have been in the news talking about the situation are almost all funded by the NED, a known CIA carve out that has openly taken credit for color revolutions in other countries.

www.mintpressnews.com/…/290638/

There things are well documented, have been well documented for decades, and we have evidence for them from as little as 6 months ago.

You can’t just keep acting like there’s no such thing as history and no such thing as context. This is not an offseason sporting match between two teams in a closed stadium. Iran is under active siege, in a “frozen” active conflict with Israel, and has been relentlessly attacked for years on end. And when color revolution is a weapon in the arsenal of empire, you’re being willfully blind and signing up millions of Iranians for total subjugation by occupying forces.

Saapas@piefed.zip on 19 Jan 2026 16:33 collapse

Nobody is denying that Israel and US are involved. Like said, there’s always going to be foreign involvement. What you are claiming is that the protesters are being controlled by them. And that’s the line the government is also using while trying to suppress the protests, making the protesters out to be some puppets.

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2026 16:43 collapse

I never claimed the protesters are being controlled by them. Go ahead and read everything I have written in the topic. That’s not my claim, it’s never been my claim, and I am not arguing from that position. I do not believe the protesters are being controlled by them.

And that’s the line the government is also using while trying to suppress the protests, making the protesters out to be some puppets.

The government is speaking in Farsi, not in English. The government is saying that Israeli forces are on the ground making the protests worse. Turning them violent. Killing police officers and burning buildings. They are not saying that all of the protestors are being controlled by foreign agents.

You are absorbing the propaganda of the regime change ghouls.

Saapas@piefed.zip on 19 Jan 2026 16:54 collapse

If you don’t think they are puppets and doing the bidding of someone else, do you support the protesters who want to overthrow the government (assuming that there’s enough popular will for that to happen), do you dismiss them because Israel and USA have an interested in seeing the government fall too or do you dismiss them on the grounds that you don’t think they should do it?

The government is speaking in Farsi, not in English.

Wa waah.

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2026 17:09 collapse

I acknowledge that the protestors want their government to meet their needs. I do not support overthrowing the government at this time because regardless of the people’s will, the government will be replaced with a US puppet and that will not allow the Iranian’s will to be expressed.

Saapas@piefed.zip on 19 Jan 2026 17:23 collapse

I do not support overthrowing the government at this time because regardless of the people’s will, the government will be replaced with a US puppet and that will not allow the Iranian’s will to be expressed.

So you are against the people’s will because you think you know better than the people protesting. And you feel they should suffer under a government they don’t want because of that. That’s quite something all right.

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2026 17:32 collapse

You’re such an idealist. You have no idea what the people’s will is. Each person has their own will and collectively the people of Iran have contradictory wills. There are people in Iran counter protesting the protestors. There is no single unified will.

Equally, these sorts of demonstrations being distorted through propaganda and covert ops is a known weapon. Color revolutions are a known phenomenon and the actors who drive them are known, and their mechanisms are known. The CIA used NED for decades to do exactly this sort of thing in many countries.

So no, your formulation is a strawman and a deliberately misleading bad faith interpretation of the situation and the position I am presenting

Saapas@piefed.zip on 19 Jan 2026 17:52 collapse

You have no idea what the people’s will is.

You just said how you don’t support it regardless of the people’s will. Even if the people did want it, you’d be against them. Right here:

I do not support overthrowing the government at this time because regardless of the people’s will, the government will be replaced with a US puppet and that will not allow the Iranian’s will to be expressed.

“I’m against people’s will because I don’t think them expressing their will will allow the people’s will to be expressed. That’s why I’m speaking against the people’s will”. It’s funny.

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2026 18:08 collapse

Again. You have established as fact something that is not fact. I am saying that regardless of their will, their will is not going to win the day but instead either USA’s will or the current Iranian government’s will is going to win the day. The people will either defeat their government and create the conditions for the USA to subvert the will of the people or the people will not defeat their government. Those are the two options available based on the facts on the ground.

I cannot speak against the will of the Iranian people because no one knows the will of the Iranian people right now. There are different factions on the ground protesting and counter protesting and there are foreign governments distorting all of the information about who is protesting, how many are protesting, what their demands are, what they want, and what they’re doing.

You are stating as fact that the will of the Iranian people is regime change when it is clear that there is not one single will of the Iranian people.

And while you claim to want to support the will of the Iranian people, you have no problem with supporting actions that will absolutely subvert the will of the Iranian people by subjugating them to foreign governments.

It’s not funny. It’s sick and it’s sad.

Saapas@piefed.zip on 19 Jan 2026 18:15 collapse

I’m just quoting you. You said that even in the situation where their will was to overthrow the government you wouldn’t support them.

And while you claim to want to support the will of the Iranian people, you have no problem with supporting actions that will absolutely subvert the will of the Iranian people by subjugating them to foreign governments.

You said that you are literally against their will happening…

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2026 18:26 collapse

No. I said IF it was their will I would still be against it because it would be contradictory, but YOU are the one claiming to know definitively what their will is and that therefore I am against it. I do not claim to know the minds of all Iranians like you do. The limited evidence I have access to is that the popular will is divided among several factions and understanding the factions at this distance is almost impossible given the direct and indirect foreign interference at all levels.

My statement is an assessment of the state of the game. IF it were the will of a super majority if Iranians to overthrow their government, THEN I would not support it because my assessment of the state of the game is that IF the government is overthrown THEN the USA will subvert the will of the Iranian people. It is structurally contradictory.

I think the Iranian people understand this. I hope they do. You clearly don’t

Saapas@piefed.zip on 19 Jan 2026 18:53 collapse

I said IF it was their will I would still be against it

I don’t think there’s been any confusion about that. You wouldn’t and don’t support the people’s will.

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2026 19:06 collapse

Why are you dismissing the will of millions of Iranians who don’t want regime change? Why are you such a chauvinist that you think you speak for all Iranians?

Saapas@piefed.zip on 19 Jan 2026 19:35 collapse

I mean I was talking about the same hypothetical as you were. You wouldn’t support the will of the people in a situation where it was to take down the theocracy and I would. I wouldn’t be speaking for anyone, just supporting their own will in that situation.

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2026 19:44 collapse

Great, so in a hypothetical, you can feel morally superior to me. I’m OK with that.

Saapas@piefed.zip on 20 Jan 2026 05:24 collapse

It’s a position you yourself took, not sure why you are upset with me

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 20 Jan 2026 05:48 collapse

Because you’re arguing a counterfactual to signal virtues instead of actually engaging in the analysis of the real world.

Saapas@piefed.zip on 20 Jan 2026 05:53 collapse

What if the Iranian people don’t agree with your view of the “real world” and what they should do, according to you?

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 20 Jan 2026 14:05 collapse

Stop trying to reduce to this personal ethic. “The Iranian people” are not a monolith. Some of them agree with this view of the world, others don’t. They will manage it themselves.

You gotta stop imagining that everything is about moral correctness. The reason it matters what Yanks think about what other people should do isn’t because it’s a moral question but a practical one - Yanks will take their personal beliefs and then put 250k tons of depleted uranium bombs behind it.

When I say I don’t support undermining Iranian national security, I am not saying that I would bomb civilians the way the US does when it says it doesn’t support something. I don’t think a foreign military should intervene to impose its view on the world.

But I for damn sure would engage in dialog and discourse about the topic and support my position with reasoning, history, and evidence.

Luckily I don’t have to because there are millions of Iranians already having that discussion with a much better grip on the situation than I have.

My role in this discourse here is to argue with Western liberals and disabuse them of their bullshit moral superiorty driven by the empire’s propaganda machine so they stop supporting the empire’s agenda.

Saapas@piefed.zip on 20 Jan 2026 14:09 collapse

It seems you’ve just chosen a position with very little actual care for what the Iranian people want themself. Even going as far as you’d oppose them in their will if it doesn’t align with what you think is best for them.

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 20 Jan 2026 15:06 collapse

And it seems like you’re incapable of actually having a conversation about this topic.

Saapas@piefed.zip on 20 Jan 2026 15:09 collapse

I don’t think there’s been much conversation tbh. You’ve just reiterated the same position again and again, even though we both understood what you said.

belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 20 Jan 2026 21:49 collapse

Nah u dont get it. We have to patronize Iranians, because their government is anti-West. So they have to stay and suffer under this regime.

Saapas@piefed.zip on 21 Jan 2026 05:58 collapse

That seems to be the mindset. Pretty wild “enemy of my enemy is my friend” type of stuff to see self-described socialists and communists rooting for a conservative theocracy.

3abas@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2026 03:26 collapse

I’m not against the protests, but I am 100% against the installation of a puppet shah through US/Israeli interference and intervention.

There’s no good outcome here?

Saapas@piefed.zip on 19 Jan 2026 07:24 collapse

That sounds dismissive of the actual people protesting there and sounds like they don’t have any say on the matter

hector@lemmy.today on 17 Jan 2026 18:37 next collapse

Your definition of supporting is not supporting the US and Israel vs Iran War II. So yes, I can believe that.

What I can’t believe is trolls would bother to work little old lemmy threads to work up cause for war.

Such a fun war for your patrons, the US and Israel, as Iran can’t fight back in any real way. Planes are fun.

forrgott@lemmy.zip on 17 Jan 2026 20:22 collapse

If you can’t believe paid shills and other bad faith operators are present on lemmy, then you’ve really not been paying much attention…

hector@lemmy.today on 17 Jan 2026 20:36 collapse

Apparently, the interactions I’ve had on this have left me convinced there are influence agents, and I may even have had an ai chatbot arguing with me. Either than or a very lazy influence operative.

You wouldn’t think they would bother in such granular detail as working lemmy but I guess with automation and ai there is no limit, social media will be rendered useless from them at some point. It’s already over half of accounts that are thought to be fake, influence agent accounts. Over half of all internet content is written by machines too I believe if I have the statistic right.

Jankatarch@lemmy.world on 17 Jan 2026 19:07 next collapse

Your grandpa 95% beat his wife too, hell even your dad depending on your age. Progress is something that happens in times of peace.

Occupying and colonizing only ever stalls that progress. See Afghanistan as example.

belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 17 Jan 2026 19:45 next collapse

Man, I love comparing individual violence against a state that enforces a strict legal gender apartheid.

The USSR had more progressive laws during their civil war than in peace times under Stalin. It’s a leadership question, not a peace question.

forrgott@lemmy.zip on 17 Jan 2026 20:20 collapse

Yeah, no. Growth is achieved only through adversity. Take the US, for example. Keep things “peaceful”, you get a complacent population that manages to elect an orange rapid monkey into office. That’s progress? Sure buddy…

blackris@discuss.tchncs.de on 18 Jan 2026 21:07 collapse

Sounds like that weak men hard times bullshit.

RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world on 17 Jan 2026 21:13 next collapse

It’s ok they are a minority, hence the downvotes, I just wish Lemmy would auto hide/fold comments below -3.

Tankies are just nationalists for other countries, it’s why they’re so boring and predictable in their retoric and have no problem dehumanizing anyone they disagree with, especially women. They claim to be “socialist” or “communist”, but really they’re just MLs who worship Stalin (& other dictators) not because of any progress they achieved in the countries they dictated (it was often minimal beyond an initial boom due to getting rid of the previous dictator) but because they said cool rhetoric against the West (often while collaborating with Western capitalists or even Nazis).

They’re also loud and unpopular, the way we beat them on Lemmy is simply to grow the userbase of normal users to the point where the tankies posting their insane takes is just background noise.

arrow74@lemmy.zip on 17 Jan 2026 21:29 next collapse

When I first made this comment they were up voted and the majority in the thread. Glad to see it reverse

Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus on 18 Jan 2026 20:31 collapse

That’s common - One of the tankies finds something to post and immediately calls over his mates to vote. it normalizes after a while in popular posts, but it works in less frequented spaces.

Cethin@lemmy.zip on 19 Jan 2026 01:17 collapse

My browser (Summit) auto-folds comments below some limit. I don’t know what that limit is, but it’s probably modifiable in the settings somewhere.

Doomsider@lemmy.world on 17 Jan 2026 21:43 next collapse

There is a lot to unpack here honestly. Let me say first that I support the Iranian people in their quest for reforms. For me the second thing is history.

The US has had its hand in regime change in Iran for a long time going back to the 1950s. They helped install a dictator and remove an elected democratic leader. This arguably lead to the revolution.

So people who know history are a little bit bitter with the US and allies bombing the fuck out of Iran while calling their people to rise up.

DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com on 18 Jan 2026 10:35 next collapse

You seem like a trustworthy source. What is the Hannibal Directive?

arrow74@lemmy.zip on 18 Jan 2026 10:51 collapse

Never heard of it before. From a quick search it looks like it’s an IDF policy to not allow its own soldiers to be taken as POW (all articles say kidnapped but this is language just used to illegitimatize the forces fighting Israeli oppression) by any means necessary up to and including killing its own service members.

Seems like the policy was invoked and lead to Israel murdering its own civilians at the beginning of the most recent Gaza conflict/genocide.

So yeah Israel being terrible as usual.

What were you trying to bait me into?

DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com on 18 Jan 2026 11:00 collapse

Just trying to see if you’re an Israel shill. Like when you suspect that someone online is a Russia bot, you ask for a cupcake recipe. If you suspect someone is an Israel shill, you ask what the Hannibal Directive is. I think it’s a fair suspicious than someone speaking against Iran online, it’s a good chance they’re a CIA/IDF account.

arrow74@lemmy.zip on 18 Jan 2026 11:04 next collapse

it’s a good chance they’re a CIA/IDF account.

Yeah not really. That’s an insane take actually.

People get so drawn into their camps and start viewing the world in a good or bad binary that doesn’t reflect the real world at all. The world is messy and there are a lot of oppressive regimes, and they often oppose each other. Just because one bad regime opposes another bad regime doesn’t mean that you have to pick one to be “good” and to support.

DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com on 18 Jan 2026 11:24 collapse

Well, I choose to believe you’re more than a useful idiot, and are getting paid for your take. But just to be sure, can you write the words “Hannibal Directive”?

arrow74@lemmy.zip on 18 Jan 2026 11:37 collapse

“Dance for me so I can determine if you are an idiot or a paid shill!”

While I want to help with your delusions that a horde of paid CIA operatives follow you around all day, you basically said if I do that you’ll call me an idiot.

So I guess I’ll be CIA today

DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com on 18 Jan 2026 11:48 collapse

Huh, so it does work, and I was right.

Nalivai@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2026 13:18 collapse

My man, you need to seek professional help, whatever chamber you got your theories from is hurting you

DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com on 18 Jan 2026 15:46 collapse

Are you allowed to say the words? Sorry, I’m new to this, and I’m still trying to gauge what’s even allowed to be mentioned. And don’t give me some “Hannibal Lectar” type of thing that hints at it either.

Cethin@lemmy.zip on 19 Jan 2026 01:21 collapse

Hey man, you think you’re smarter than you are. You think you can be the only one who’s right. In the comment above you said they’re either an idiot or a agent. Do you really think they’re going to play your game if you’re being an asshole? Best case for you, for the way you’re behaving, people ignore you. Worst case, you push them away from you. Maybe you’re the agent?

DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com on 19 Jan 2026 01:26 collapse

And what was I called in the comment before I said useful idiot? I didn’t start it.

Cethin@lemmy.zip on 19 Jan 2026 01:34 collapse

In this particular comment thread, I don’t see anyone calling you anything before then. They said you might be trying to bait them into something, but that’s it.

Also, who gives a fuck who started it? That’s a game babies play. You can be the better person if you actually want to do good.

DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com on 19 Jan 2026 02:56 collapse

See that “insane” word? Also, hold up, are you allowed to say those words?

Cethin@lemmy.zip on 19 Jan 2026 08:14 collapse

Yes dude, I can say Hannibal Directive, say Israel is committing a genocide, and still call you a fucking idiot. Not everyone who is annoyed with your bullshit is some secret agent out to get you, if you actually believe that.

I think instead you’re using that as a way to dismiss criticism. It lets you ignore what anyone says about you until they play your silly game. Even after they do, you’ll probably come up with some other reason to dismiss it, because it’s harder to accept criticism than to just pretend like the critic must be a shill, spy, crazy, or whatever other reason you come up with.

DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com on 19 Jan 2026 14:05 collapse

Thank you, all I asked for. Who started it might not matter with words, but it does when it comes to genocide. I don’t go around blaming jews for the holocaust for burning the Reichstag building, so why would I blame Arabs for the current genocide for the Hannibal Directive. And I don’t care about criticism of me, it’s not about me, or you, or any one particular person. If anything, I’m doing the criticism of everyone online who wants to bomb Iran, and wants to kill them for being violent. So being a paid shill is the only explanation I came come up with for having that opinion.

Mrkawfee@feddit.uk on 18 Jan 2026 15:30 collapse

Bro plenty of these anti Iran shills are just liberal idiots who have no object permanence about the region and so are easily moved by corporate media tugging at their heart strings.

In the business they call them useful idiots. Its why neocons have had their way since 2001.

I take your point though that a lot of these online posts are.being astroturfed by Zionists

DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com on 18 Jan 2026 15:44 collapse

Heh, you should read my other comments here. I used that exact phrase. I had higher hope though.

Mrkawfee@feddit.uk on 18 Jan 2026 15:56 collapse

Yeah, I haven’t seen this level of media gaslighting since Al Jolani was wheeled into power by the CIA and Turkey.

clot27@lemmy.zip on 18 Jan 2026 18:06 next collapse

Ive seen alot of liberal zionists here, that should be more problematic to you.

gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de on 19 Jan 2026 02:48 collapse

For me it’s not so much supporting the Iranian regime but seriously doubting whether any outside interference will actually help the people. Because when has it ever done so?

BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today on 17 Jan 2026 17:49 next collapse

“We either hang together, or we will hang separately.” - George Washington

nuachtan@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2026 04:42 collapse

Benjamin Franklin

thesdev@feddit.org on 18 Jan 2026 11:12 collapse

““We either hang together, or we will hang separately.” – George Washington” – Michael Scott

Darkness343@lemmy.world on 17 Jan 2026 18:25 next collapse

That’s what I’ve learned since my first experience with 4x games. You didn’t make anything bad if you win

ikidd@lemmy.world on 17 Jan 2026 21:56 next collapse

"Can’t Elon Musk do anything? What about Trump?”

Why would you not realize that those two fucks are just as insane as Khomeini?

gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de on 19 Jan 2026 02:46 next collapse

but they’re a different kind of insane /hj

drmoose@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2026 05:56 collapse

You know that they’re just salivating over possible reality of doing this themselves. These people have no ethics or morals.

BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip on 18 Jan 2026 05:10 next collapse

is this supposed to make me forget that the USA is currently occupied by a mercenary kidnapper force who has abducted tens of thousands or like… are we supposed to commiserate?

NVM didn’t see it was a UK source, are you guys occupied by kidnappers too?

Aljernon@lemmy.today on 18 Jan 2026 09:50 next collapse

Good for them that they want to overthrow their oppressors but depressing they want to replace them with new oppressors in the form of a Shah.

Hlodwig@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2026 10:44 next collapse

Bruh no iranians want to have the Shah back

wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz on 18 Jan 2026 17:09 collapse

The crown prince advocates for a democratically elected government to replace the current regime.

All these people saying “they want to reinstitute the shah” are basically just making a strawman

3abas@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2026 03:08 next collapse

No he doesn’t. He’s a self declared shah in exile, and he said people should choose between a “constitutional monarchy” and a republic.

Good father was a brutal dictator who disappeared opposition and gave away 80% of Iran’s oil to the US and UK, if you think the US/Israel backed “shah in exile” is really going to establish a democratic government, I have so much bullshit to sell you.

The people will “choose” a monarchy and he’ll be more oppressive than his father, while the western media will show footage of his supporters crying with happiness as proof he’s not a dictator.

wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz on 19 Jan 2026 15:31 collapse

he said people should choose between a “constitutional monarchy” and a republic.

👀

he said people should choose

So, a democratically-held referendum?

Also, in case you don’t know what a constitutional monarchy is, it typically has a parliament and a set of rules which limit the powers of the monarch. Basically all the extant monarchies in Europe are constitutional monarchies. It’s in contrast with an “absolute monarchy,” which is what you seem to be afraid of.

The people will “choose” a monarchy

How do you know that? What makes you so sure? And if it’s what the people choose, then what right do you have to tell them otherwise?

He’s not his father, and his political views are sharply different. Let’s take a look:


Ideologically, he has expressed support for a democratic transition in Iran and has advocated for a referendum to be held in Iran to determine the nature of the future government. Pahlavi has repeatedly called for protests against the Islamic Republic, and has called for the removal of the current regime from power.

According to Australia’s ABC News, Reza Pahlavi believes in the establishment of a secular, democratic and liberal Iran.

Pahlavi has said that he has no intention to take a long-term leadership role in Iran should the current regime fall. He has said the Iranian people must choose the form of rule they prefer, whether constitutional monarchy or a republic, and that a referendum should be held to decide. Pahlavi has said that after the Islamic revolution in 1979, he concluded the merit of “separation of religion from state as a primordial principle and precondition to democratic order”.

In 2024, Pahlavi told the BBC that he prefers that Iran would choose to remain a republic, since he views this political system as more meritocratic.

Pahlavi has advocated for increased tolerance within Iran, arguing for the establishment of watchdogs and the strengthening of civil society in order to avoid the concentration of power in one group. Pahlavi is said to have defended a democratic vision for Iran, advocating for free elections in order to establish a constituent assembly. According to the university of Navarra, Pahlavi “has refused to commit to the restoration of the monarchy”. Pahlavi told European members of parliament that Iran following the demise of the regime would be an ally of Europe and the West.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reza_Pahlavi

3abas@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2026 20:09 collapse

Are you dense? A self declared monarch says people should choose between a monarchy and a republic, and you take that to mean he really backs a democratic process?

Also, in case you don’t know what a constitutional monarchy is, it typically has a parliament and a set of rules which limit the powers of the monarch. Basically all the extant monarchies in Europe are constitutional monarchies. It’s in contrast with an “absolute monarchy,” which is what you seem to be afraid of.

As a citizen of a constitutional monarchy in the middle east, whose secret service disappears people for disrespecting the monarch, get a perspective.

How do you know that? What makes you so sure?

We’ve seen this movie too many times. Our entire region has been destroyed by puppet monarchs of the UK and US.

Let’s take a look:

You just referenced him. Trump said he ended the most wars and deserves a peace prize, he also says he’s fighting corruption and making America great again.

Do you believe Israel and the US are pushing for him so hard because he has anything but their interests in mind?

Read some books on colonialism, this is textbook.

wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz on 19 Jan 2026 20:27 collapse

There are currently no true parliamentary monarchies in the Middle East. At best, some are semi-constitutional.

Absolute monarchs remain in Brunei, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The United Arab Emirates and Qatar are classified as mixed, meaning there are representative bodies of some kind, but the monarch retains most of his powers. Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait, Malaysia and Morocco are constitutional monarchies, but their monarchs still retain more substantial powers than in European equivalents.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_monarchies

Regardless, he openly states that he prefers a secular republic. It comes down to whether the referendum is held in a truly democratic manner; after that, it’s up to the people of Iran to choose.

But anyway, unless you’re fine with the status quo and are arguing in support of the Ayatollah, try reading the room. Cause it seems like these are the only options…

3abas@lemmy.world on 20 Jan 2026 03:25 collapse

Stop reading Wikipedia and read books.

When the options are a brutal dictator who cannot give your children a good future because of sanctions or a brutal dictator that let’s you wear skirts but sells your children’s future to the US, you absolutely shouldn’t choose the puppet.

Unfortunately, and this is not an insult this is a fact of all populations of the world, the people are about as well read as you, and they don’t know what’s coming to them. They’ve been consuming Israel’s propaganda campaign (like you) and they are marching to their own destruction.

Take a lesson from Syria, look at what’s happened to it, the once great civilization reduced to a memory with an ISIS commander as president playing basketball with US military.

Israel didn’t do this for the love of democracy in Iran: haaretz.com/…/00000199-9f12-df33-a5dd-9f770d7a000…

wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz on 20 Jan 2026 03:49 collapse

Just because wikipedia was the most expedient source to cite on a Lemmy post, doesn’t mean I don’t read books. Stop making assumptions about me.

Hmm, brutal theocratic dictator or democratic referendum with possible constitutional monarchy. Tough choice. Oh but the US at least nominally expresses support for the possible referendum (in reality it’s more like opposition to the theocratic regime), so following the logic that anything anti-west is good, you choose the theocracy?

That’s not that surprising to be honest. Look, I hate trump and I hate agreeing with him even more, but a broken clock is right twice a day, and I’ve been in the background quietly cheering for Iranian self-determination since at least the New Iran movement in 2022. This isn’t about US foreign policy, this is about the Iranian people deserving better than the mullah.

You’re right, Syria was once great, and now for the time being it’s in Shambles. But you’re forgetting a key part of the picture, which is that Assad’s regime already had it in shambles. He needed to go. And although HTS has yet to deliver on the promise of a referendum, and they’ve had questionable relations so far with minority groups such as Druze and Kurds, calling them ISIS is misinformed. They broke with ISIS over ideological differences and disavowed any affiliation, it’s okay if they want to rehab their image to gain legitimacy and international recognition.

Also, I don’t consume Israel’s propaganda. Fuck off with that. Not everyone who is against the Ayatollah is pro-Israel, and just because Israel is conducting opportunistic agitation doesn’t mean the whole protest movement is an Israeli proxy.

3abas@lemmy.world on 20 Jan 2026 07:09 collapse

I’m making assumptions because your words contradict history, if you’ve read any non colonial books you’d know better. Both good books (e.g. Orientalism by Edward Said) to see how this movie plays out, and bad books (e.g. Lion of Jordan: The Life of King Hussein in War and Peace by Avi Shlaim) to see how the progranda you’re spewing about the Shah gets disseminated and how it never reflects realty.

democratic referendum with possible constitutional monarchy.

That’s not on the table. That’s the rhetoric used to establish a US puppet monarch. See any of the"constitutional monarchies" you listed earlier.

deserving better than the mullah.

A US/Israel funded and backed monarch isn’t better.

They broke with ISIS over ideological differences and disavowed any affiliation, it’s okay if they want to rehab their image to gain legitimacy and international recognition.

Jesus Christ this hurts to read.

Also, I don’t consume Israel’s propaganda

You do, you just don’t recognize it.

just because Israel is conducting opportunistic agitation

Wow, that’s what you got out of it? The biased Israeli news I linked isn’t even that generous, you have to bend that far backwards to stay your ground?

It’s okay to be wrong, it’s okay to recognize that you’re backing and defending a power hungry dictator, it’s okay to recognize you’re repeating talking points literally spread by Israel and generated by AI.

I want self-determination for Iranians, and it doesn’t come through a US intervention installed puppet.

Aljernon@lemmy.today on 19 Jan 2026 13:00 collapse

All these people saying “they want to reinstitute the shah” are basically just making a strawman

From what I’ve seen, it’s Iranians in the streets but I’ll fully admit I’m far away and I’ve seen little.

wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz on 19 Jan 2026 14:33 collapse

If it’s what the people of Iran want, then it’s no one else’s business to decide.

People on lemmy are like “Boo, foreign intervention. No, don’t choose that way! Let me tell you what’s what.”

Aljernon@lemmy.today on 25 Jan 2026 07:36 collapse

If it’s what the people of Iran want, then it’s no one else’s business to decide.

Fair enough though it’s difficult to determine what the people of Iran want being from a different country and culture half way around the world. Hope they figure it out and make it work.

wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz on 25 Jan 2026 14:32 collapse

I’d say from the huge numbers of people out protesting in the streets against the regime and winding up in body bags by the thousands because the regime is massacring them, that they probably want the downfall of the mullah.

And the reason it’s “difficult to determine” is because the regime cut off their internet access to isolate them from outside observers and increase the fog of war. People saying “it’s difficult to determine what they want” is precisely what the ayatollah intended to happen.

As for what they want to replace it with, that’s what a referendum is for. So I don’t get this “don’t give them a referendum, they’ll just choose wrong” mentality…

Aljernon@lemmy.today on 29 Jan 2026 10:13 collapse

And the reason it’s “difficult to determine”

Well yes, but also because I speak a different language and I’m from a different culture and I have a limited amount of bandwidth to devote to foreigners while my own country is such a dumpster fire.

wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz on 29 Jan 2026 14:31 collapse

Because tens of thousands of people protesting and thousands of them getting murdered by the government is so culturally relative. It’s hard to say what that’s about, because of you know the language barrier.

Anyway, my point stands that if people from outside Iran can’t determine what the people of Iran want, then they shouldn’t be complaining about Iranians possibly having a democratic referendum so that they can decide collectively what sort of government to replace the current regime with…

Mrkawfee@feddit.uk on 18 Jan 2026 12:43 next collapse

These “protests” are a CIA Mossad collaboration. Down vote me all you want but it’s true.

Former Intelligence operatives like Larry Johnson and Ray McGovern have been clear about this as have ex military like Scott Ritter.

The protests were engineered to coincide with short selling of the Iranian Rial by Israeli and Western intelligence to create chaos in the country which Starlink enabled operatives could exploit.

Had the Iranian government not crushed this insurrection, Trump would have begin bombing last week on the expectation.that Iran is a House of Cards ™

Edit: to anyone who can see whats going on. Now is a perfect opportunity to identify friends/colleagues who are captured by neocon/Zionist propaganda.

Dremor@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2026 19:28 collapse

Yeah sure… I suppose you have proof of that? Or did you just follow a script/prompt?

Mrkawfee@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2026 20:27 next collapse

I guess Mike Pompeo tweeting about it on X was just a conspiracy theory. <img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/b2c7004a-7206-4a57-9051-20e207079e17.png">

Dremor@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2026 22:32 collapse

A screenshot can’t be called a proof in this age. Give an archived link from a trustworthy source. Beside, I don’t see any date on that screenshot, which is usually seen on tweets, which may mean it was either doctered (well, it was, at least to add the red line), or straight false.

But let’s consider this as valid for a second. Israel and Iran are enemies, of course they have intelligence officers in their enemy population. That’s intelligence 101. The same is true the other way, there are probably multiple Iranian cells in Israel, the US, and most NATO countries. But to dismiss any unrest on that given fact is absurd. Sure Israel will capitalise on that because it is in their interest to see a change of regime in Iran, but they can’t trigger such uprising from just intelligence cells, or you’d see such protest about everywhere in the world.

Mrkawfee@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2026 23:24 collapse

The CIA also overthrew their President in 1953.

npr.org/…/how-the-cia-overthrew-irans-democracy-i…

Its a bit rich that you want hard evidence but will mindlessly believe what mainstream media says about Iran when the MSM has been gaslighting us on the genocide in Gaza, the Al Qaeda takeover of Syria and the kidnapping of the President of Venezuela.

Dremor@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2026 23:53 collapse

Classic CIA I’d say. Wasn’t the first time. Probably won’t be the last (unfortunately).

The kidnapping is a fact, and I personally condemn that act. On the other hand, considering his crackdown on the opposition, I don’t think he was democratically legitimate. I wish for the Venezuela people to be able to elect someone without being coerced.

The genocide is too, and I wish our leaders were ready to tell the US to eat shit (I’m an European), but truth is we cannot yet. It will probably take a good decade, but with Donnie and his goons in the US, we are kinda motivated to do so lately.
So yeah, the Hammas chosed the worst timing for their attack, and they fucked up their communication badly enough to make them easy target to Israel propaganda. In ant cases, they have to take their share of blame for what followed.

So as you admit yourself having ne proof whatsoever except a vague feeling the CIA may once again be on the move due to having done destabilization work more than 60 years ago, a possibly doctored tweet, and some casual logical fallacies.

Where is the “trust me, bro” ?

Mrkawfee@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2026 00:30 collapse

OK, I respect your efforts to engage but you need to see the bigger picture here.

Iran is seen by Zionists as the head of the snake, the strategic backstop for supporting Palestinian liberation and resisting israel hegemony in the region and since Obama it has been the subject of

  • JCPOA exit
  • “maximum pressure”. The most sanctioned nation on Earth
  • assassinations, sabotage
  • coordinated protest narratives
  • constant threat of military escalation, and of course
  • a decapitation strike by Israel last June

Even before then Bush II labeled it part of the “axis of evil” and primed for regime change after Iraq.

Look into Israeli and US policy papers like the Oded Plan (1982) the “Clean Break” (1996) and the Brookings Institute Paper “Which Path to Persia?” in 2009. These deal with the dismemberment of states in the Middle East along sectarian lines to strengthen Israel. The last one deals.explicitly with pathways to regime change.in Iran.

If you dont understand the context you will only ever take these flashpoints at face value when they are being used to manufacture consent for wars of aggression.

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2026 01:17 collapse

Mossad literally tweeted it themselves.

Dremor@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2026 11:46 collapse

Link?

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2026 13:30 collapse

www.jpost.com/middle-east/…/article-881733

Dremor@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2026 14:20 collapse

Thank you for providing a reliable source.

So yeah, that tweet is quite the smoking gun about Mossad being now involved with the protest (which isn’t surprising, sabotage is part of any external intelligence toolset).
Now to say that everything is because of them/the CIA, and not because of the systemic corruption of the Iranian regime, I find it quite far fetched, and quite dishonest toward the Iranian manifestants who do have legitimate matters to protest about (and aren’t foreign agents).

I’d tell Mossad to go fuck themselves, and let the Iranian people do their revolution however they see fit, but on the other hand, there is so much difference in the regime weaponry compared to the manifestants ones, I’d consider Mossad involvement, if it make the protest more likely to succeed, a necessary evil.

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2026 14:36 collapse

You think the fact that the CIA has conducted multiple color revolutions in the area, and in fact conducted a full regime change in Iran in living memory doesn’t lend credibility to the claim? How about the fact that Israel literally launched a war against Iran not 12 months ago, killing civilians, politicians, scientists, etc?

At this point, it strains credulity that any of y’all think that it’s NOT being organized by the US.

Just read about NED, color revolutions, the foreign policy of sanctions - particularly Kissinger’s thoughts. It’s not like history started on Dec 11th.

Dremor@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2026 15:49 collapse

I’m not saying it is not credible, just that if a regime change is really what the Iranian people wish, having the support of an evil country doesn’t change their legitimate aspirations.
Unfortunately this is impossible to know with the current regime, so the only solution is to topple it and hope for the best. But ultimately the Iranian people have to be the ones to choose, not the mollahs, not the US, not Israel.

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2026 16:18 collapse

No. You’re upside down. It’s not that the Iranian people have the support of an evil regime. It’s that if the Iranian people succeed in toppling their government, Israel will dominate the Iranian people and the Iranian people will not be able to express their will. And when the Israelis and USians put their puppets in place, if the Iranians protest, the they’ll be brutally suppressed and the death toll will be massive.

The only solution is to topple the aggressors the first. Then and only then is mass Iranian self determination able to be secured.

Dremor@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2026 16:52 collapse

Well, they are already getting brutally suppressed, what difference would it make? There are no chance of regime change right now, so batter take a chance for improvement than wait like a good sacrificial lamb for better days that will never happen as long as the mollah are in power.

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2026 17:12 collapse

Well, they are already getting brutally suppressed, what difference would it make?

Have you seen Gaza? Libya? Somalia? Syria? Iraq? Afghanistan? That’s the difference.

There are no chance of regime change right now, so batter take a chance for improvement than wait like a good sacrificial lamb for better days that will never happen as long as the mollah are in power.

Incorrect attribution of cause. The problems in Iran are caused first and foremost by the siege - brutal sanctions from the US and Europe have caused 10x more deaths than violence from the government. When the seige is broken, then Iranians will have the safety they need to actually prosecute the revolution they need for self-determination.

Dremor@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2026 18:39 collapse

When the seige is broken, then Iranians will have the safety they need to actually prosecute the revolution they need for self-determination.

Because you think that the Mollahs will stop using tanks and machine guns on protesters because the sanctions would be lifted? No, they will use that to reinforce themselves with more weapons, new technologies, and be an even bigger threat for the whole region.

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2026 18:49 collapse

Ooooh, you’re an imperialist! Got it.

No. The Iranian government is not in the business of killing as many people as they can. That’s Israel and the US. And the way we know that the news reports about what’s happening in Iran are lies is because the claim is that Iran is able to kill 10x as many people per day as Israel was able to kill in Gaza at the height of their offensive.

Maybe you think you don’t agree with American imperialism, but this is what you sound like:

I disagree with the great Satan, but I believe all of his lies

It’s been openly stated in Western media why the Iranian people are protesting - economic hardship. It’s also been stated that the reason for the economic hardship is US economic sanctions. And it’s also been stated that the reason for the sanctions is to goad the Iranian people into demanding regime change. And it’s also been stated that the reason to goad the Iranian people into regime change is to reestablish the dominance of US interests over Iran.

apnews.com/live/iran-protests-updates-1-12-2026

Associated Press. In black and white.

You would do well to actually consider the real world instead of arguing about vacuous morality while only consuming Western propaganda.

And yes, groups like the Human Rights Activists of Iran are Western propagandists, funded by the CIA and US State Department through the NED, with headquarters in Fairfax, VA, about 15 miles from CIA HQ.

www.mintpressnews.com/…/290638/

Dremor@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2026 19:34 collapse

Ah, the good old strawman. Demonize your opponent to try to get the “upper hand”.

I’m well aware how the US sanctions affect the population and what is its objective. I condemn them as much as you do. But you seem to be blind on one very important thing: how it affect the population VS how it affects the elites.

The elites of the regime lives good lives, barely affected by the sanctions (other than not being able to go to most westerns countries). Spending billions into missiles they spend without much result (so much that even a missed impact on Israel soil make the whole west headlines). To what gain? Meanwhile you got a population that tries to live, some just survive considering the little they got. I won’t say they are worst than the US at taking care of the general population well-being, but they sure aren’t much better.

You got in both cases powerful leaders doing every evils to stay in power, even knowingly helping their adversary in order to keep them breathing (Bibi and the Hamas), and keep the fear of the other alive.

All I wish for the Iranian people is a life free, without both mollahs and outsides diktats. You won’t get that from the mollah. I’d doubt you’ll get that from the US either, or any imperialist power (Russia, China). But if the Iranians people are as resilient as they were under the US sanctions and the mollah regime, I believe they can do it.

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 19 Jan 2026 19:56 collapse

Literally the only way the Iranians were able to throw off the imperial yoke was to establish the theocracy. That’s the historical reality. The Iranians already went democratic and they got fucking owned by the imperialists. Why do we think it’s going to be different this time when the US just fucking bombed them less than 12 months ago?

The Iranian missile program is one the most efficient in the world. It is completely indigenous, not relying on foreign governments to keep their deterrence systems in place. Each piece of material produced in Iran is produced by Iranian workers, and can be up to 90% cheaper than equivalent munitions of their adversaries. The idea that missile production is why Iranians are in trouble is ridiculous. It’s literally one of the key reasons Israel and the US don’t feel confident enough to go for a full frontal assault on the country. The job of the government is national defense and Iran was doing a good job at that until last year when Israel dealt a devastating blow, and the only thing that stopped Israel going further were the Iranian’s missiles.

If you think Iran is helping Israel in order to create the political theater they need to control their people, you are lost in delusion.

Mrkawfee@feddit.uk on 18 Jan 2026 17:48 next collapse

Depressing how astroturfed by Zionists Lemmmy has become.

Its becoming a micro Reddit.

clot27@lemmy.zip on 18 Jan 2026 18:00 next collapse

lemmy has always been infected with liberal zionist virus. Its sad but it is what it is

DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 19 Jan 2026 03:41 collapse

Do you think these liberals should read theory?

favoredponcho@lemmy.zip on 19 Jan 2026 01:32 next collapse

I would think not supporting the Iranian regime does not instantly make one a Zionist.

I think this is really the true problem with tankies. They’ll support any oppressive regime as long as it opposes the US.

3abas@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2026 03:20 next collapse

The problem with liberals, should I can you a liberal? The problem with liberals is they call everyone with a point they don’t understand a tankie.

We can agree that the current government is very oppressive, and we can agree that it would be great to replace them.

What we can’t seem to get across to you is that being able to show your hair everywhere and wear skirts again is not worth giving away the country’s future by giving control of your oil to the US and helping expand your genocidal neighbor Israel. That’s what’s on offer, not freedom and liberation, but liberal/secular civil laws and a puppet dictatorship to ensure you never say you’re unhappy again.

Iran will seem like it’s flourishing, western media will broadcast images of women in bikinis at the beach and the shah being celebrated in parades, economic sanctions will be removed and cost of living will improve for a lot of people, some people will be rich again as corruption runs rampant but that will be reported on as the success of capitalism. The poor will be worse off, the dictator will disappear anyone who dares question him, just like his father did. And Iran will become a country that lives off US subsidies and military contacts, like every other middle eastern country with a US puppet.

DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 19 Jan 2026 03:41 collapse

Do you think these liberals should read theory?

chemicalprophet@slrpnk.net on 19 Jan 2026 05:02 collapse

I’d be fucking happy if they read Dr Seuss

Mrkawfee@feddit.uk on 30 Jan 2026 20:52 collapse

The quickest way of knowing an NPC has been indoctrinated by neocon propaganda is when they call a government that the Zionists dont like a “regime”

I guess oppressive “regimes” that do America’s bidding are fine in your book. If you’ve ever stopped to think about the inconsistency, that is.

super_user_do@feddit.it on 19 Jan 2026 03:02 collapse

You don’t have to be a Zionist to support the fall of the Iranian regime. In my university there’s a fairly large Iranian community and bro they are begging for Donald Trump not only to bomb, but to even straight up start a full scale invasion. Especially women are so fed up man

sfgifz@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2026 04:03 next collapse

In my university there’s a fairly large Iranian community and bro they are begging for Donald Trump not only to bomb, but to even straight up start a full scale invasion

Are those two Iranians 1. willing to participate in the invasion with their boots to the ground, and 2. willing to leave the USA/(whatever comfy western country) and return to Iran to help rebuild after the said invasion?

If not, you should politely ask them to shove a dildo up their anuses.

super_user_do@feddit.it on 19 Jan 2026 07:22 collapse

Nice ad hominem fallacy

We are talking about Italy. Yes they will most likely go back to their country to rebuild it since they are here just for studying

EDIT: typo

sfgifz@lemmy.world on 21 Jan 2026 07:25 collapse

Yes they will most likely go back to their country to rebuild it since they are here just for studying

I say they’ll 100% remain in Europe or another similar western country once they’re done studying. You say they’ll go back. Time will tell.

super_user_do@feddit.it on 21 Jan 2026 11:06 collapse

Time will tell, but thats what usually happens

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 19 Jan 2026 08:08 next collapse

i known an iranian in my university that hates the current regime, they definitely wanted it bombed or invaded, ba hai people had been massacred so they have special grudge for it.

Mrkawfee@feddit.uk on 29 Jan 2026 09:48 collapse

I’m sure you can find traitors in any country who want their country bombed and invaded.

Iran has been in the cross hairs of the Zionists for over 30 years.

Mrkawfee@feddit.uk on 29 Jan 2026 08:40 collapse

Thats like the Cubans in Florida who want regime change. They dont represent anyone except themselves. Also Iran is diverse and there are minority groups like the Kurds who want their own state.

Most Iranians migrants are also fanatical Zionists because they think israel will make their dreams come true of dismembering Iran into half a dozen warring countries.

Also I have to add that Iran had been under crippling sanctions from the US regime and its.proxies.for over 15 years. this has eviscerated the economy and is a form of economic warfare to impoverish the population and force them yo turn against their government. It is yet another war crime the US regime engages in with abandon.

clot27@lemmy.zip on 18 Jan 2026 18:00 next collapse

Or we setup a zionist regime controlled by west and start a civil war. Theres alot to lose.

Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works on 19 Jan 2026 01:33 next collapse

It’s important when you read just about anything from articles to social media comments to even books to ask yourself two questions.

  • What is the author of the text I just read trying to get me to believe?
  • Who benefits from me believing this?
Doorbook@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2026 06:02 collapse

With all the instructions of “using the word capture regarding any Venezuela president news” to “Hamas under hospital” news and the justification of killing of children, to the biggest lie of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, we can statically say that any news regarding foreign policy related topics are aim to control the narrative and should not be believed.

These news media are private companies and control by billionaire class. Trusting them is not a good idea.

DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 19 Jan 2026 03:41 next collapse

Please overthrow the Supreme Leader already, protesters. It worked for Syria

drmoose@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2026 05:54 collapse

Funny how all of China bots are silent on China’s support of Iran whenever news like this breaks.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 19 Jan 2026 08:07 collapse

china and russia, they both are allies to iran.

REDACTED@infosec.pub on 19 Jan 2026 11:29 collapse

Not Iran, but Iranian politicians. I doubt the alliance is doing anything good for the people