The world reacts to Trump's sweeping tariffs: 'No basis in logic' (www.huffpost.com)
from MicroWave@lemmy.world to world@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 03:15
https://lemmy.world/post/27721152

Summary

Global leaders criticized Trump’s new tariffs, which range from 10% to 49%, warning of trade wars and economic fallout.

The UK and Italy urged negotiation, while Brazil passed a reciprocity bill. China and South Korea vowed countermeasures.

Australia and New Zealand rejected Trump’s logic, citing existing trade deals and low tariffs. Norfolk Island was baffled by a 29% duty despite having no exports.

Financial markets dropped, oil and bitcoin sank, and leaders warned of inflation. Analysts say Trump risks fracturing global trade with little to gain economically.

#world

threaded - newest

givesomefucks@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 03:20 next collapse

It’s illogical to expect an illogical man to act logically.

Someone like trump needs hit first to avoid a confrontation.

InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 03:28 next collapse

If I was Prime Minister, I’d impose a retaliatory tariff of 9000% just because it’s all just this stupid.
Call it the Goku tariffs, but drag it out over an hour or two with a lot of screaming.

SarcasticMan@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 03:49 next collapse

Call a press conference, build up to announcing the 9000% tariff but then end the conference promising to come back next week and make the announcement.

justsomeguy@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 04:38 collapse

PEOPLE OF THE UK!

I NEED YOUR ENERGY TO CHARGE THESE TARIFFS! AHHHHHHH \o/

Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social on 03 Apr 03:51 collapse

Wouldn’t it have to be 9001%?

Iheartcheese@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 04:59 next collapse

Spoiler

InvertedParallax@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 05:39 next collapse

Power levels are bullshit.

frunch@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 09:28 collapse

Says the guy with the broken scouter

InvertedParallax@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 09:41 collapse

Your reply has a lot of Yamcha energy.

frunch@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 10:23 next collapse

You’re absolutely right, I can easily hear that comment in his voice too

InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 11:01 next collapse

You’re hired

huquad@lemmy.ml on 03 Apr 11:11 next collapse

Naa, 9001% is too high. It’s impossible. Better stick with 9000%.

WildPalmTree@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 13:42 collapse

ISO PTSD trigger warning! Hide that shit the next time.

falkerie71@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 03:33 next collapse

Putting tariffs on Norfolk Island and Heard and McDonald Islands are particularly funny considering Heard and McDonald Islands only has penguins living there lol.

SGforce@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 03:49 next collapse

Yo this motherfucker put tariffs on Antarctica?!!Heard Island.jpg

Oops, wrong one. Still close. <img alt="Heard and McDonald Islands world heritage area" src="https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/371efb88-a4c6-4dfa-beda-c883c03702c7.png">

cerement@slrpnk.net on 03 Apr 04:04 collapse

also a 10% tariff on the joint US military base at Diego Garcia …

gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 05:35 collapse

Lmao wat.

I’d ask if you’re serious, but I’m also sure you are.

Honestly, I was expecting this administration to be mind-numbingly stupid, but somehow they keep finding ways to surpass my expectations on that front on a daily basis. I’d be impressed if it wasn’t so catastrophic.

cerement@slrpnk.net on 03 Apr 06:13 next collapse

from Mastodon: “tariffs by ChatGPT”

Litebit@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 08:56 next collapse

well, they can’t even name a single country in ASEAN.

gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 12:39 collapse

no, “Sean” is not a country in ASEAN. That is incorrect.

barneypiccolo@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 13:01 next collapse

I’ve heard that if you type in the right prompt into ChatGPT, this list is the result. They couldn’t even be bothered to have an expert figure this out, or even souble check it before releasing it. So they end up putting tariffs on penguins.

gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 13:14 collapse

From the article you’re probably referring to:

DCInvestor’s observation came in response to crypto trader Jordan Fish, also known as Cobie, who also asked ChatGPT using the prompt: “What would be an easy way to calculate the tariffs that should be imposed on other countries so that the US is on even playing fields when it comes to trade deficit. Set a minimum of 10%.”

A straightforward (if naïve) method is to set the tariff rate for each trading partner equal to the percentage share of the trade deficit relative to that country’s total imports-always no less than 10%.

In formula form:

Tariff Rate (%) = max(10, (Trade Deficit ÷ Total Imports) x 100)

For example, if the US runs a $20 billion deficit on $100 billion worth of imports from a country, the calculated rate is (20/100)×100 = 20%. If the deficit were only 5%, you’d still impose a 10% floor. This method ignores the intricate dynamics of international trade-such as elasticities, retaliatory measures, and supply chain nuances-but it provides a blunt, proportional rule to “level the playing field.” One might implement it in Python like so:

def calculate_tariff(trade_deficit, total_imports):
  # Calculate the deficit ratio as a percentage
  ratio =(trade_deficit / total_imports) * 100
  # Enforce a minimum tariff of 10%
  return max(10, ratio)

# Example usage:
tariff = calculate_tariff(20e9, 100e9)
# $20B deficit on $100B imports yields a 20% tariff
print(f"The tariff rate should be {tariff}%")

We are defining trade policy with predictive text. What a time to be alive. Jesus tapdancing christ.

barneypiccolo@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 13:32 collapse

The Sociopathic Oligarchs want to assign as much responsibility to AI as possible. Smart people are expensive, AI is cheap. That makes AI the better choice to run the world.

gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 13:38 collapse

I look forward to building my retirement in a handful of years in the recovery phase of this exercise in abject idiocy (assuming there is, in fact, anything to recover)

CileTheSane@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 16:58 next collapse

Every time I think they’re hiring rock bottom they bring out stronger drills.

gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 17:27 collapse

That’s a hilariously apt analogy. Drill baby drill! 🫠

prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 03 Apr 18:47 collapse

I saw someone here explain it well… That when you try to understand the depths of the idiocy, you get the same feeling you do when you try to comprehend the size of the universe

Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 04:30 collapse

Those penguins are trying to rip off America! It’s about time they pay their fair share

adarza@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 04:52 next collapse

penguins like cheetos. i remember that uh… ‘documentary’. we should send 'em a big giant fat one. no charge. just to say ‘sorry’ for imposing the unfair tariffs on their trade.

jaybone@lemmy.zip on 03 Apr 06:25 collapse

I’ve never once heard a penguin say thank you.

barneypiccolo@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 12:58 collapse

Those slovenly penguins dont wear suits, either.

Wytch@lemmy.zip on 03 Apr 03:40 next collapse

Oh, do you guys think he might be a stupid maniac gosh

tisktisk@piefed.social on 03 Apr 03:51 collapse

shocked_pika
thanks for the honest lol

Drusas@fedia.io on 03 Apr 03:50 next collapse

What the fuck did they expect?

dryfter@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 03:56 next collapse

“No basis in logic”

No shit, this whole administration has no basis in logic. Just look at Project 2025 and the progress they’ve made on it in a little over 2 months.

lumony@lemmings.world on 03 Apr 13:48 collapse

Woah, and biden waited until the very end of his term to do something as benign as removing Cuba from the list of state sponsors of terrorism.

Man, whoever is voting for establishment democrats in primaries is really just helping Republicans at this point.

N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Apr 03:59 next collapse
  1. Order tariffs
  2. Make everything more expensive for everyone everywhere
  3. Piss off the entire world and invite countermeasures
  4. ???
  5. MAGA
lumony@lemmings.world on 03 Apr 13:44 collapse

for everyone everywhere

This is all so the American companies don’t actually have to compete with anyone else. Instead of lowering their prices to be competitive to give better deals to customers, they game the system and force everyone else to raise prices to match theirs.

There are people who are benefiting from this. People like elon musk who don’t need to worry about, say, affordable electric vehicles from China.

I’d like to call Republicans the Party of Useful Idiots, but I genuinely believe they’re working in tandem with the Establishment Democrats at this point. It’s a two-pronged strategy to ensure the disparity in wealth never decreases.

The rich get richer while the working class squabbles over bullshit.

Jhex@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 15:36 collapse

That whole story assumes the population of the USA will continue to have the capacity to buy stuff… this assumption is ever less likely as the USA is heading into the worst recession they have ever experienced

CileTheSane@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 17:00 next collapse

You have to remember the people doing this are fucking idiots who have convinced themselves they’re smarter than everyone else.

Jhex@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 17:52 collapse

Exactly… Yesterday Trump’s “liberation day” clearly proved this

Jamini@lemmy.zip on 03 Apr 17:23 collapse

I recently read an article that suggested the best retaliation would be to stop enforcing US intellectual property in the EU. One of the biggest exports they have is media, if we would stop enforcing their copyright it would cost them a lot of money.

Depression.

It’s a depression.

Sludgehammer@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 04:01 next collapse

and the price of bitcoin dropped 4.4%.

I cannot express how much I hate that this appears in a serious economic article.

13igTyme@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 07:00 next collapse

You don’t like hearing about made up currency with no backing that’s primarily used for pump and dump schemes and money laundering?

Breezy@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 07:19 next collapse

But arent all fiat currencies made up since there’s no gold standard backing them.

ByteJunk@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 07:35 next collapse

If I can’t pay my taxes with it, it isn’t a real currency.

gnutrino@programming.dev on 03 Apr 08:36 next collapse

By that logic you don’t think foreign currencies are real?

x00z@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 08:36 collapse

I pay my taxes with Euros so I guess Mericuhn Dollers are not a real currency

ByteJunk@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 17:30 collapse

Depends. Do Mericuhns pay their taxes in Dollers?

Skiluros@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 10:43 collapse

No, they are backed by the economies of the issuing countries.

Gold standard is not viable in a modern economy.

Comtief@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 21:51 collapse

Bitcoin is primarily used for pump and dump schemes? You mean like the middle step trade between scam crypto and real money?

CircaV@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 13:03 collapse

The price of speculative speculation dropped

Sludgehammer@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 04:04 next collapse

Shortly after Trump’s announcement, the British government said the United States remains the U.K.’s “closest ally.”

I’m sorry TERF island, that’s not gonna keep Trump from stabbing you in the back too.

ByteJunk@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 07:32 next collapse

It’s heartbreaking, really.

The UK is like a kid who just got his face covered in mud by bullies, and goes “aren’t my friends wonderful for playing with me?”.

supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz on 03 Apr 14:27 collapse

Well see there is just the problem, TERF island needs more toxic masculinity so the men can be tough!

/s

Jhex@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 15:34 next collapse

The UK already shot themselves in the foot turning their back on the EU… they have no one left, they are done for

conditional_soup@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 16:58 collapse

Heads up, UK, the US will use you as a toilet every chance you give it, and we’ve just dropped all pretense, however thin it may have previously been, about caring about our “allies”. Speaking as a US citizen, I would strongly advise against considering yourself a close friend to the US until we get our shit sorted.

cerement@slrpnk.net on 03 Apr 04:06 next collapse

<img alt="" src="https://slrpnk.net/pictrs/image/e2b353e5-6596-480e-bcbb-8ff4cf81d9e7.png">

adarza@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 04:48 next collapse

ok, then…

i have a huge trade deficit with walmart.

i buy way more from them than they do from me ($1200-1500 a year vs $0); just like the u.s. buys more from many countries than those countries buy from the u.s.

like the leaky diaper’s new tariffsimport tax, i should charge myself a ridiculously high extra tax on purchases from walmart until they buy $1200-1500 a year of some mythical product from me to even out the ‘unfair’ imbalance?

yea. that’ll work.

sfbing@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 07:34 next collapse

Sounds like you had better open a diaper factory in your house. Then you wouldn’t have to pay the tariff that you are charging yourself.

danc4498@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 07:44 next collapse

I think Trump doesn’t want to trade at all. He wants us to produce everything we need.

biofaust@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 07:51 next collapse

Just like Mussolini.

andallthat@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 08:04 collapse

and see how well that turned out?

[deleted] on 03 Apr 08:06 next collapse
.
biofaust@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 08:08 next collapse

One can only dream. Joking there is no Resistenza in the USA.

ProfHillbilly@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 08:28 collapse

I am really afraid that this is what America is coming to. The problem is that we have a third of the country that supports the Mango Mussolini.

ExtantHuman@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 13:52 next collapse

Well, artificially increasing the price of all the raw naturals we use to make those things will certainly help with that goal…

Cenzorrll@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 19:11 collapse

I’m actually pretty down with that that. We should be able and ready to produce whatever we need in case another country does what trump is doing or something happens that would prevent trade. If China attacks Taiwan, we should be able to produce our own chips. We should be able to function with as little dependence on other countries as possible.

In no way do tariffs fix that. You invest in yourself, slapping your friends because they’re better than you at something is really fucking stupid.

danc4498@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 20:16 collapse

He’s hoping the foreign companies are going to open up shop in USA to avoid the tariffs.

wuzzlewoggle@feddit.org on 03 Apr 09:41 next collapse

That’s actually a pretty good and understandable explanation of what’s going on.

andallthat@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 10:47 collapse

the “logic” is pretty much as you described it. Only, after charging yourself with the extra tax on Walmart purchases, you obviously can’t afford Walmart any longer, so you learn to make your own soap with ash and the fats of animals that you have started breeding in your own flat.

WildPalmTree@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 13:39 next collapse

So sad and so true. You made me giggle and frown at the same time. Have some 🥇.

suigenerix@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 19:20 collapse

Or your neighbour does all the work instead of you, so you decide to buy soap from them. They’re next door, while Walmart is across the county line, so you decide you won’t charge yourself the extra self-tax with your neighbour.

Walmart"s soap, which used to be $2, is now $3, while your neighbour’s soap is $2.50.

A week later your neighbour sees that demand for their soap is huge because everyone is self-taxing. So they raise their price to $2.95 to make extra profit.


In case you think this is just a contrived fiction, this is exactly what happened to many goods, like solar panels, with Trump’s first-term tarrifs. Americans paid over double the average world price for solar panels.

Worse still, Trump knows this happened, yet somehow this time will be completely different. <sigh>

joostjakob@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 05:42 next collapse

Thank you! Neither the BBC nor the Flemish public tv seem to say this yet (they just repeat the statement Trump gave)

Catma@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 11:16 collapse

This is the only person I have seen say this so I can only guess no one is repeating it but it appears to be correct when I checked a few countries.

Its fucking insane to think Cambodia has a 97% tariff, and he thinks they are getting rich off of it.

prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 03 Apr 18:44 next collapse

Just unfathomably stupid.

kebab@endlesstalk.org on 03 Apr 19:06 collapse

Nope, not for every country. Russia is missing from the tariffs

Overview In January 2025, United States exported $34.9M and imported $196M from Russia, resulting in a negative trade balance of $161M.

Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 04:30 next collapse

No basis in logic is a nice summary of the Trump administration in general.

Azwing@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 04:52 next collapse

Dumb man does dumb thing he considers a race and insists he won.

Treczoks@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 05:56 next collapse

I hope the EU reacts with something non-tariffy. Like forbidding US online platforms to serve ads and collect personal data, with severe punishments if they still do.

ray1992xd@feddit.nl on 03 Apr 07:22 next collapse

Yes that would be amazing and a great stimulant for EU companies to start developing a competing platform of it’s own (we have BeReal, Dailymotion, Medal and Dumpert, but they aren’t very big AFAIK)

Treczoks@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 08:07 collapse

Having Non-US platforms would be nice, yes, But leaving the US-based ones without ad revenue and a shit-ton of users would be nice, too.

deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz on 03 Apr 09:09 collapse

Why not both?

wuzzlewoggle@feddit.org on 03 Apr 09:37 next collapse

I recently read an article that suggested the best retaliation would be to stop enforcing US intellectual property in the EU. One of the biggest exports they have is media, if we would stop enforcing their copyright it would cost them a lot of money.

LavaPlanet@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 10:43 next collapse

I think a lot of that kind of stuff is going to happen. I don’t think other countries are insulted, as much as they find it ridiculous, and to be ridiculed, I think they’re going to do some inventive chaos. I think we need to be building some world bingo cards, and I’ll bet we won’t guess all the (hopefully hilarious) petty revenges about to snowball.

Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 10:50 next collapse

You don’t even have to go that far. Just adopt sane copyright laws, like copyright only lasting the life of the artist.

huquad@lemmy.ml on 03 Apr 11:10 next collapse

Thats still too long imo. Patents are 20 years, so should every IP protection.

Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Apr 16:01 collapse

If it’s good enough for inventors, it’s good enough for musicians, writters and software developers.

lumony@lemmings.world on 03 Apr 13:33 next collapse

Copyright and patent laws should just go away entirely.

The amount of resources we spend enforcing them, just so we can spend more resources on the products themselves, could all be spent improving the lives of people who need it.

Most great art doesn’t make much money anyways, barely more than a service job if you’re lucky. It’s the trashy-shit for low-standards morons that makes an egregious amount of money, like the marvel crap we keep seeing every year.

I’d be fine with less marvel-crap in the world. It’ll make what we do get more impactful, and we can dedicate more resources to fewer, higher-quality products.

ExtantHuman@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 14:16 next collapse

That’s a great plan for letting those mega corps steal from the little guy EVEN more than they already do

lumony@lemmings.world on 03 Apr 14:52 collapse

Not really.

Corporations aren’t going to be making billions of dollars off of, say Photoshop, if copyright and patents laws didn’t exist.

Same goes for hollywood movies.

You’re peddling rhetoric that was put here by your oppressors so you will work against your own interests. Congratulations.

ExtantHuman@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 18:16 collapse

The entities with the established distribution networks will make the money, not the little guy who makes their own little story.

If I write a little seld published novel, under your system, Hollywood can just take that story and make a movie of it without my permission. How is that better? You think more people pirating will take down these mega corps? Your system is chaos that’s even worse than the current model.

yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de on 03 Apr 19:13 next collapse

They can do so currently by making a couple of minor changes and settling for a pittance because your lawsuit would bankrupt you.

“Chaos” is a better system than one benefitting corporations only.

lumony@lemmings.world on 03 Apr 19:55 collapse

Your dilemma essentially translates to “wahh, he stole my idea!”

You’re also missing the forest for the trees, again. How is hollywood going to make an egregious amount of money off of ‘your’ idea without copyright and patent laws? Without them, piracy isn’t piracy. It’s just a normal and legal way of sharing media.

Sad watching how hard you people go to bat for your oppressors, but it really puts into perspective why things are the way they are.

The average person just can’t see past their conditioning or how hard they’ve been indoctrinated to support a system that works against them. In the words of Mark Twain, “it’s easier to fool a man than to convince him he’d been fooled.”

Comtief@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 21:41 collapse

Your mistake is thinking that Marvel is art.

ExtantHuman@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 13:57 collapse

Yeah, but think about the grandchildren of the CEO who bought that IP from the artist‽

Do you want them to starve have to work for a living?

Treczoks@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 11:28 next collapse

Of that I am not convinced. This will work with a lot of smaller countries that don’t have much of a copyright portfolio, but not with Europe.

samus12345@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 16:46 next collapse

Official EU website hosting American-made media for a nominal fee. Can’t tariff data!

Wooki@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 20:51 collapse

Would also save the EU an enormous amount in monitoring and enforcement

riodoro1@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 10:16 next collapse

We can only hope.

lumony@lemmings.world on 03 Apr 13:30 next collapse

Advertising should just be illegal.

It gives an unfair advantage to those who already have an unfair advantage.

I recommend installing an addon called AdNauseam to block ads in addition to sending data that you’ve clicked them.

Please everyone. Try to understand that being a useful idiot is the norm these days. It’s what’s cool.

Nikelui@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 14:23 next collapse

Nice mention of AdNauseam, here is a link:

adnauseam.io

It’s based on uBlock Origin, so still state of the art in ad-blocking.

Fluke@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 15:52 collapse

Someone needs to create plugins not to block data being sent, but to send inordinate amounts of trash data.

Make the whole system pointless.

Wispy2891@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 15:00 collapse

or something ultra specific that is super easy to source from any other country, to exclusively hurt the american businesses

kent_eh@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 15:32 collapse

or something ultra specific that is super easy to source from any other country, to exclusively hurt the american businesses

That was part of what went into how Canada chose the targets of out first rounds of counter-tariffs.

Product categories that we also make here, or can easily get elsewhere or can comfortably do without for an extended period of time.

That combined with a consumer led boycott of anything "made in the USA " and even staunch Republicans like Mitch McConnell are starting to push back against Trump.

WanderingThoughts@europe.pub on 03 Apr 05:58 next collapse

Of course there is logic, but not the logic most politicians want to admit. This is simply:

“Nice global economy. It would be a shame if something happened to it. Maybe we can come to an understanding, and this whole tariff thing goes away. You do want free trade, don’t you?”

msage@programming.dev on 03 Apr 07:05 next collapse

What about Israel? Aren’t they sucking you dry? Perhaps add some tariffs there?

LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 12:42 collapse

17% and they’re already crying about it.

Ironically it’s the closest the US has gotten to a BDS policy in its history with Israel.

lumony@lemmings.world on 03 Apr 13:42 collapse

they’re already crying about it.

Fuck zionists. I hate them all.

Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 07:37 next collapse

All the goods that Trump excempts from tarrifs is tipping his hand. If I were one of these countries like Taiwan where semiconductors are exempted, I would apply an export duty equal to the tarrif on other goods. If you want to tarrif me fine but you’re going to have to commit.

ThraawnSolo@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Apr 08:44 next collapse

Is the plan to isolate us?

1984@lemmy.today on 03 Apr 08:50 next collapse

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerationism

End goal.

lumony@lemmings.world on 03 Apr 13:27 next collapse

This is not the end goal.

Anyone who believes this without critique is incapable of autonomous thought.

1984@lemmy.today on 03 Apr 13:35 collapse

Still it was too difficult for you to express your own opinions. Too scary?

lumony@lemmings.world on 03 Apr 14:44 collapse

Arguing with you people is a waste of time.

I’m going to ignore you now.

AJ1@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 15:24 next collapse

it’s not really arguing if you’re not making a point though, is it? it’s just insulting people and refusing to explain why. that’s not the same thing as arguing.

Fluke@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 15:50 collapse

“I’m too smart to deal with the likes of you.”

Riding that dunning-krueger curve like a pro fucking surfer.

lumony@lemmings.world on 03 Apr 16:36 collapse

Yeah, fools think everyone is worth arguing with.

Gonna block you, too.

Fluke@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 16:56 collapse

Oh no. Anyway…

non_burglar@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 14:02 collapse

I would tend to agree with the process part of accelerationism, but I don’t think there is a goal.

The “crazy like a fox” theory is contradicted by several pretty dumb tells that suggest the administration is headed and staffed by actual idiots.

MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 08:51 collapse

Seems to be what a lot of the far right want. It’s essentially what Brexit has done to us in the UK

charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 08:52 next collapse

He’s got that dementia infused vindictiveness against the people who want him dead

Litebit@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 08:52 next collapse

no tariffs on russia, only sanctions?

uienia@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 15:15 collapse

Don’t worry, they are working on removing those as well.

b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 03 Apr 09:16 next collapse

They’re AI generated tariffs. He asked Grok and these are the numbers it spat out.

Zaraki42@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 11:12 next collapse

He’s imposing tariffs on uninhabited islands… what a fucking moron…

b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 03 Apr 11:14 collapse

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/1a6317ed-b3d1-4f9e-aa81-53b97872371e.webp">

There are penguins! 🐧

HeliumFalcon@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 11:22 next collapse

McDonald’s fucked up his order recently which is why their island received tariffs.

He’s going to get free hamberders for life when they cave.

Zaraki42@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 11:22 next collapse

True. Those freeloading penguins.

AJ1@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 15:22 collapse

they have it hard enough already without tarrifs. wasn’t it last year or the year before where an entire colony of emperor penguins had every single chick die that breeding season? that’s extremely sad. but sure, hit 'em with tarrifs too, why not

one_fot_mon@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 13:11 next collapse

Maybe this is some 5D chess move against the rise of penguins

werefreeatlast@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 13:18 next collapse

Give him some credit (not a lot). What if China were to give these penguins cars to resale? Middle men penguins is what they are. They should call the island Midway island, a term invented by his assholness.

Comtief@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 21:53 collapse

These penguins managed to put USA into trade deficit with the island somehow?

Bassman1805@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 11:28 collapse

They’re mostly [Trade deficit]/[Exports to US]

Which is a fucking stupid basis for tariffs.

frezik@midwest.social on 03 Apr 12:45 next collapse

The depth of stupidity of this Administration will be studied by mathematicians for centuries as a new form of fractal.

BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 12:53 collapse

It’s possibly the most stupid basis for tariffs. The penalty is directly proportional to U.S. reliance on a country’s imports. The countries that are the most important suppliers to the U.S. are penalized the most. It’s a policy designed to cause maximum reshuffling of production, which maximizes the start-up costs of developing new factories and so on. And those factories are not going to be in the U.S. Import substitution industrialization is a failed policy and it won’t work for reindustrialization either.

[deleted] on 03 Apr 10:59 next collapse
.
Naevermix@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 11:27 next collapse

Art of the deal, folks

lumony@lemmings.world on 03 Apr 13:26 collapse

This is unironically a great deal for him and his cronies and an awful deal for the working class.

I swear, it’s just distraction after distraction, obstacle after obstacle that keeps us from toppling the ruling class. Anytime we get anywhere close to doing something significant, it’s like the useful idiots come out in droves to make sure “NOPE NOPE NOPE, gotta keep history repeating itself!”

I wish I took my teachers and intelligent peers more seriously as a kid. I didn’t realize how lucky I was to be surrounded by such great, smart people. I took them for granted, and now that I’m out in the real world I see exactly how stupid the average idiot is.

It’s scary. Terrifying, even. There’s so many of them and they all use that as justification for why they’re right.

barneypiccolo@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 12:52 next collapse

Have we forgotten that he has done this each month since he was Inaugurated?

Today the stock market will crash on this news. The wealthy will buy on this massive dip, and in a few days, HitlerPig will announce that the countries on his list have responded to his tariff threats, so he is postponing them for a month or so.

The stock market will recover a bit, and the wealthy will make a fortune. In a month, he’ll do it all over again.

It’s deliberate market manipulation.

ibelieveinthehousehippo@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 13:52 collapse

I am stealing “HitlerPig”

barneypiccolo@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 14:15 collapse

I’ve been using it ever since i heard thats what the younger staffers in the Biden White House called him. I found it simultaneously hilarious, vicious, and accurate. I encourage you and others to use it often.

Agent Krasnov is an acceptsble alternative.

Other suggestions:

Kapo Stephen “PeeWee Himmler” Miller (my favorite)

Steve “Unwiped Asshole” Bannon

Empty G

Lauren Boobert

Big Boobie Bondi

Couchfucker Vance (not very original, but a good reminder)

Gold Digging Whore (the Propaganda Secretary, I can’t be bothered to learn her name)

Traitor also works for all of them. Nazi, too.

AJ1@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 15:17 collapse

D-bag works well enough for my purposes

barneypiccolo@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 18:33 collapse

Sure, whatever works for you.

bitjunkie@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 13:13 next collapse

No basis in logic if he were actually trying to do what he says he is. He’s not. They make perfect sense if the goal is to destabilize the country. We elected a fucking Manchurian candidate twice, and the in-between term was spent on a bunch of business as usual and not setting up protections in case it happened again. This country is fucking done.

beernacle@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Apr 13:33 collapse

A trade world war that wreckz western economies and evens the playing field for Russia, China, Iran, etc. is a good thing! /s

lumony@lemmings.world on 03 Apr 13:23 next collapse

I mean, it’s pretty logical.

He wants to enrich his American buddies, and this is how we do it.

Instead of competing fairly with foreign businesses, Americans artificially increase the prices of the competition so customers don’t have a cheaper option to choose.

I want to say this country sucks, I really do. But in all honesty, this generation sucks. The greed and consumerism on both sides is what led us to this.

It’s a two-pronged approach where we have the ‘lesser-evil’ morons working in tandem with the ‘greater-evil’ scumbags to ensure good never prevails.

Fuck everyone who voted for hillary clinton and joe biden in their primaries. I put the blame squarely on them for why we have 2 trump presidencies.

Big reason why I didn’t vote this election. Tired of supporting the “lesser-evil” crowd that never supports me for some reason. Loyalty is a one-way street with them.

Fourdayold@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 13:32 next collapse

You had me right up to “I didn’t vote”.

DNS@discuss.online on 03 Apr 13:46 next collapse

Nut had me when he blamed democrats for Trump. Not the actual Russians propping him up and the NRA who was funneled money from Russia to give to Republicans.

FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 13:48 next collapse

Why?

Democrats and Republicans have spent the last eight years convincing the poor and middle class that voting doesn’t matter. Hell, Democrats even subverted their own primary rules twice to strike that point home, and then argued in court that it was their right to do so when they were sued for it.

I vote, but I can’t pretend it matters much when I watch most people in this country across the last eight years working gig jobs for 100 hours a week and all their labor can buy for them is a roach-infested studio regardless of where they live, and our president always has money and time for genocide.

uienia@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 15:16 collapse

It is always someone else who is at fault for Trump except Trump himself, the Republicans, and people like you who didn’t vote.

FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 15:28 collapse

Realistically, it’s the fault of people voting for shitty candidates. That’s not a matter of opinion, but of fact.

Randomgal@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 13:53 next collapse

Because that means you supported Trump, regardless of what you say, your actions helped put him in power.

tane@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 19:40 collapse

By that logic they would’ve supported Kamala by not voting had she won. Dumb

lumony@lemmings.world on 03 Apr 14:12 collapse

If you’re mad at me for not voting, blame the people who keep nominating establishment candidates.

Every ounce of effort you spend trying to convince me to vote for the lesser-evil would be better spent convincing people not to nominate the lesser-evil.

Jamini@lemmy.zip on 03 Apr 17:26 collapse

Our options on the left are to unite yesterday or die.

There isn’t really another option anymore. People are dying, now, because we can’t rally.

lumony@lemmings.world on 03 Apr 19:56 collapse

See, it’s that kind of panic that causes people like you to flock to your abusers again and again.

I’m done supporting my abusers. You should be, too. Then we can actually start solving problems instead of just losing slower.

FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 13:51 collapse

I don’t think this is a generational thing, personally, unless we’re talking about the Boomers.

The Boomers took a vibrant, beautiful world and spent two generations driving it into this McDonaldized hellhole we live in, after reaping the benefits of the most prosperous economic period for workers in our history in the 1960’s. They’re still profiting now thanks to the lopsided tax policies that favor people with wealth.

The vast majority of the country only has one or two choices when shopping for necessities now, so I can’t really blame them for the world that they were born into. Calling young people consumerist is just blaming them for circumstances of which they had no real control.

lumony@lemmings.world on 03 Apr 14:16 collapse

Calling young people consumerist is just blaming them for circumstances of which they had no real control.

What? Have you heard the music they listen to? Gucci this, versace that. Have you seen the celebrities they look up to? Gold chains this, expensive tattoos that. Don’t even get me started on the cars that cost more than my house.

Just try suggesting to them that delivery apps are scams or that they can be getting most of their digital entertainment for free and see what reactions you get.

No, they are proud consumers doing their part to keep the disparity in wealth growing.

FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 14:23 next collapse

Your point of view sounds a whole lot like the 2500 year-old history of blaming young people.

In reality, however, it’s the Boomers who are largely responsible for the world we find ourselves in, not the 20 year-olds. Electing Reagan twice, by itself, was more harmful to American society and beneficial to consumerism than anything Gen Z has done.

supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz on 03 Apr 14:47 next collapse

Exactly

lumony@lemmings.world on 03 Apr 14:48 collapse

Yes, boomers are responsible for what there generation did. We’re responsible for what our generation is doing.

Don’t misconstrue my criticism of the current youth as exoneration for the previous generations.

Like it or not, it’s a lot easier to manipulate young people into spending their money than it is older people. This is directly related to the concept of consumerism and how the powers that b have convinced yet another generation to follow in their parent’s footsteps of “those who have more deserve more, and those who have less deserve less.”

supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz on 03 Apr 14:24 collapse

lol you sound like such a boomer

lumony@lemmings.world on 03 Apr 14:45 collapse

Yeah. That’s rhetoric people like you have been fed to justify your consumerism.

Jhex@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 13:38 next collapse

“No basis in logic” will be both the title of Trump’s time in office and the reason why the USA collapses

ExtantHuman@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 13:51 next collapse

Ooh boy, does my retirement account feel liberated.

Dragonstaff@leminal.space on 03 Apr 14:01 next collapse

The “Empires last 250 years” thing is bad history and not really supported by fact…but…

gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de on 03 Apr 14:34 next collapse

Well just to be fair - and i know people like shitting on Trump but hear me out - the complaints from workers against out-shoring labor to other countries has been very loud for many years.

Everytime the newspaper reports “Company X has moved its factory to China” you can be sure that lots of people are gonna complain about it. But tariffs are the only thing that actually forces companies to put the factories back to the USA. Or do you have a better idea?

ventusvir@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 14:47 next collapse

You can’t just flip a switch to have manufacturing moved to the United States overnight or even five years. Not to mention that even raw goods needed to even start the process that are being tarriffed like aluminum just doesn’t come out of nowhere. This is a dumb sledgehammer approach that’s going break more things than it fixes

tane@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 15:17 next collapse

You need to have a plan in place before doing this to even think about bringing manufacturing back here. And tariffs need to be like the last part of the plan

gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de on 03 Apr 19:36 collapse

I agree that a plan is needed. Still, what would be the other parts of the plan? Tariffs are the only really impactful measure, it seems to me. Tariffs on import and subsidies on export.

Also, maybe Trump is so “on-off” with the tariffs to give companies a warning to bring back manufacturing to the US, and them lifting them again to not cause a recession, giving them a few years to set up the infrastructure, and then re-install the tariffs. One needs to look for the “good outcome”, sothat one steers in that way.

AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 15:19 next collapse

Maybe calculated tariffs on commodities where companies are contemplating outsourcing, but that’s a step you take in advance in order to dissuade their action. This is like making the whole school sit with their heads down through recess because one specific kid was unruly.

Edit: There wasn’t even an unruly kid. The Principal is just vindictive, has a hangover, and hates children.

gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de on 03 Apr 19:34 collapse

because one specific kid was unruly

Edit: There wasn’t even an unruly kid.

Well, outsourcing labor was a mass phenomenon in the last 50 years.

houseofleft@slrpnk.net on 03 Apr 15:54 next collapse

I think you’re kind of being unfairly downvoted because it’s definitely underappreciated how much tariffs are used in modern trade deals.

Putting selective import tariffs on certain goods (like say car manufacturing) might be a wise move if you want to encourage the US to develop a manufacturing base. It’s worth noting that the US, and most other countries have been doing this selectively for years.

This is reeeaally far from the tariffs that have actually been anounced though, which are the highest rate the US has had in around 100 years, and applied pretty indescriminately. There are some goods that the US just can’t produce itself (like certain rare earth minerals that aren’t in the USA) but even worse, because of the insane logic of applying them to countries as they have been done, it opens up this type of event:

  • A comany like Apple might assemble laptops in the US, but import parts like chips from, say, China.
  • They now have around a 40% tariff on all chips, which is really going to drive up cost, and leaves them with two options.
  • Option one, they bring all manufacturing into the US, which would take a long time to build up the infrastructure, and still really ramp up the price because wages in the US are so much higher than they are in China
  • Option two, they outsource everything to say Mexico or Canada who don’t pay the tariffs on Chinese chips, and just pay the wholesale import tariffs are needed to bring things from Mexico/Canada to the US. They also get to skip out all the reciprocal tariffs that other countries are placing on the US in retaliation for the recently announces ones when they import out to, say, Europe.

Even option one is bad, because Apple might sell laptops internally, but the newly increased price makes them super uncompetitive with rival firms overseas, so it might still lead to a loss in overall jobs for US workers.

I’m not pretending this doesn’t suck - but US based international companies like Apple have a clear incentive to just forgoe the US as much as possible now. This kind of risk is why countries have traditionally been very conservative with changing tariffs.

I think you’re probably right that there might be an argument for countries to be less conservative than they have been, but the US government just cranked up the dial from 0 to 11 and we’re all about to find out what that might look like in real time.

BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 17:48 next collapse

U.S. factories in most cases cannot produce goods that are competitive in a global market. Our labor costs are too high.

This idea that we can revive American traditional manufacturing of basic goods is a complete fantasy. The factories in Vietnam aren’t going anywhere, because they will still be selling to the other 95% of the globe outside the U.S. Even if factories are stood up in the U.S., they will be constrained to producing higher-priced goods exclusively for the domestic market, with all the attendant inflationary impacts from start-up costs and higher labor costs.

Meanwhile, retaliatory tariffs from other countries will cause the collapse of U.S. exports. We’ll lose markets for the sectors where the U.S. is still competitive, like agriculture, advanced manufacturing, and even services.

Trump’s approach is similar to the failed development strategy of import substitution industrialization, except in this case he thinks it will cause the U.S. to reindustrialize. In any case, it will fail for the same reasons ISI failed in Latin America.

prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 03 Apr 18:41 collapse

But tariffs are the only thing that actually forces companies to put the factories back to the USA. Or do you have a better idea?

I mean no… And, how about accepting that the US is no longer a manufacturer, and that’s just fine in a global economy

gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de on 03 Apr 19:15 collapse

tell that to the workers

prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 03 Apr 19:19 collapse

I mean we did like 40 years ago…

gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de on 03 Apr 19:30 collapse

40 years ago knowledge workers were in high demand, and IT was booming. Now, IT is enshittifying, so what do the workers do next? Where do they go?

StopTouchingYourPhone@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 15:09 next collapse

I don’t buy that Trump has anything to do with the logic behind this world-destabalizing shock and awe spectacle.

The conversation would be different if people stopped attributing authorship to him and acknowledged the massive decades-old machine using him as a mouthpiece.

But it sure makes people feel smart though. Gives them something to meme about while the people who planned this get the real dirt done. Maybe he’ll misspell a country name next… Do another ad for Leon’s dinkeys, Israeli beans or something. Stoopid Donald got poopy pance. lol.

seeigel@feddit.org on 03 Apr 18:24 collapse

The conversation would be different if people stopped attributing authorship to him

Is there a lemmy channel for those conversations?

HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 15:40 next collapse

I saw someone say it seems that the tariffs were calculated by dividing our trade deficit by their exports to us and cutting that number in half. Another person analyzed his charts and concluded they look a lot like they were generated by AI.

So, there is, literally no basis in logic. Either one of Trump’s minions calculated what it would take to recoup the difference in the trade deficit and just wrote it down and he announced that as the new basis for international trade, which has never, ever been done, for the reason that it is fucking idiotic, or he asked Gemini how to execute his already objectively stupid policy and wrote an Executive Order making it the law.

And the fact that we are forced to accept people on the Internet’s guesses about how he calculated these numbers may actually be worse than the fact that just about every product on the market more complex than a stapler just jumped about 30% in price.

Smokeless7048@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 16:20 next collapse

AI would make a lot of sense, considering that there are uninhabited islands on the list.

sistarena@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 16:57 next collapse

Heather Cox Richardson, historian of the republican (Lincoln) party said that in her daily newsletter. She cites all her sources.

bender@infosec.pub on 03 Apr 17:55 next collapse

They published their “methodology” today, and it’s as dumb as you’d imagine: ustr.gov/…/reciprocal-tariff-calculations

DozensOfDonner@mander.xyz on 03 Apr 20:06 collapse

I’m dumb but that just means that every product will be 30% more expensive for Americans, right? And the 30% is just… Going to the state or something? So it’s just taxing your ppl?

ultranaut@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 20:43 collapse

Effectively, yes. Tariffs are basically just a sales tax. It’s a little more complicated than that but the end result for consumers isn’t really any different.

Freshparsnip@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 16:16 next collapse

None of Trump’s policies have any basis in reality

SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 18:20 collapse

I’ve been saying this for years - why does anyone listen to him? He has no credibility - his whole life bio shows this clear as day.

CileTheSane@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 16:20 next collapse

So 100% on brand for Trump and America in general

Gates9@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 16:46 next collapse

<img alt="" src="https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/947479f7-afd0-4db8-b387-185dc28b7ab4.jpeg">

selkiesidhe@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 17:21 next collapse

Good god he is so freaking stupid I can’t even…

sommerset@thelemmy.club on 03 Apr 17:41 next collapse

translated some analytics written for Russian audience. from here: t.me/s/artjockey

About the Tariffs Today marked the “great day for the USA” previously announced by Trump, as the U.S. has now imposed import tariffs against the entire world. I won’t make predictions about how this will affect the global economy, how much the S&P has dropped, and so on. Instead, I want to draw attention to something that might not be immediately obvious.

The newly introduced tariffs can be divided into three parts: economic, political, and protective.

At the core of these tariffs is a baseline 10% duty on all imports. I’m not sure why there’s so much noise around this—basically, Zoomers invented the reusable shopping bag, and Trump has invented VAT. The U.S. has never had a national-level VAT before, only state-level sales taxes. Now, there will be a federal VAT, but only on imports and only at 10%.

There are also clear protective tariffs, intended to give advantages to domestic manufacturers and to motivate foreign companies that want to sell in the U.S. to move production inside the country, so they can stay competitive against local producers. These are 25% tariffs on all imported cars and computers. It’s all fairly straightforward and not worth overanalyzing. Russia has all of this too: VAT, protection for domestic car makers (e.g., AvtoVAZ), and maybe in the future Trump will even “invent” vehicle recycling fees.

In short, Trump could have quietly pushed a 10% import VAT through Congress without much publicity, and you wouldn’t have even seen the news in any headlines. But in that case, he wouldn’t have been able to kick off a series of trade wars.

The most interesting part of the tariffs is their political nature. I think everyone understands that the 54% tariff on all imports from China (a combination of a previous 20% and today’s 34%) is by no means a reciprocal move—it’s a global trade war that could even precede a real war. This was expected; Trump launched a trade war with China during his first term, and the motivations are clear.

What’s far more intriguing are the tariffs against some of America’s allied countries, which, in my opinion, make up a rather unexpected list:

India: 26%

Japan: 24%

EU: 20%

Taiwan: 32%

South Korea: 25%

Israel: 17%

Philippines: 17% (a country hosting U.S. military bases aimed at China)

Meanwhile, countries that didn’t receive tariff increases and stayed at the base 10%, from a global perspective, include:

South American nations: Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay — 10%. Panama also 10%.

Oil-rich Middle Eastern countries: Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, plus Turkey.

AUKUS members: UK and Australia — even though Trump criticized Australia in a speech, no extra tariffs were added.

Africa: Though likely of little strategic interest to Trump for now.

From this differentiation of tariffs, you can infer how Trump views the U.S.’s global strategic direction—a vision that will likely be pursued further.

Notice the low tariffs for South America. Remember how Rubio, right after taking office, made a diplomatic tour across Latin America—something that hadn’t happened in a century? It seems Trump is aiming to “pull Latin America out of China’s hands” and form a U.S.–Latin American alliance in the Western Hemisphere.

At the same time, clear preferences are being given to those joining new U.S. military alliances, as alternatives to the increasingly hard-to-control NATO.

On the other hand, traditional U.S. allies are out of luck. The economies of the EU, Japan, and South Korea—countries that have money but are not considered crucial allies by Trump—are being treated as revenue sources.

This is especially evident in the EU’s case. According to the “Trump Doctrine”, the main rival to the U.S. is China, and the EU is useless in the fight against China. They won’t go to war over Taiwan, nor will they support a likely sanctions regime against the PRC. So, in Trump’s view, they should simply start paying America in hard currency now, with the long-term plan being further deindustrialization and relocating manufacturing to the U.S…

The tariffs will go into effect between April 5 and 9. Based on past experience, I wouldn’t be surprised if they never actually take effect—maybe they’ll be repealed, suspended, or something else. But if nothing changes and the 20% tariffs on the EU, Japan, and others remain in place long-term, then the so-called “golden age of universal prosperity” will likely become a thing of the past for those nations.

bingBingBongBong@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 20:04 collapse

Who cares what the russo nazis think

pr0sp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Apr 17:53 next collapse

So, now $1 per banana is now real, wow. A complete bunch on my country costs that… We are banana exporters we are the banana republic…

jasparagus@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 18:35 collapse

It’s one banana, Michael. What could it cost? $10?

youtu.be/Nl_Qyk9DSUw

bearenbey@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 17:56 next collapse

Norfolk Island was baffled by a 29% duty despite having no exports.

Ahahaha. For a day, I want to be inside his head and see the world through his eyes. It would be the most valuable insight for humanity… If only to learn exactly what not to do.

WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 20:57 next collapse

It would be like that scene in Braveheart, where the Prince is having servants walk in front of him holding a full length mirror, so he can constantly admire himself.

Duamerthrax@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 21:44 collapse

No thoughts. Only anger at being confused.

More then racism, Trump’s appeal is being a simple answer to a complex question. Which happens to mean racism when applied to race relations, but also harebrained economic policies or injecting bleach into yourself. This is the same man who used a sharpy to change the path of a hurricane on a map rather then admit he misspoke.

Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 18:53 next collapse

You know what’s fun? Cancelling stuff and citing the reason as ‘tariff-related inflation’. It’s too new and there is no response script yet, so customer service doesn’t really argue.

SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 19:20 next collapse

The point is to make China the new boot on the throat of the human race instead of the US

eurisko@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 19:59 next collapse

I hate the fact that you are correct.

yagurlreese@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 20:02 collapse

no. the US is still the boot

SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 21:30 collapse

That’s why they installed a Russian asset as president and why he has been destroying the US’s global influence and economy for the last 3 months.

werefreeatlast@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 19:40 next collapse

Dead horse economics:

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/530071fc-10b4-4f32-979f-856187b15554.jpeg">

Wake up you lazy horse!

yagurlreese@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 20:00 next collapse

what an absolute bafoon. so devoid of thoughts

mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 20:09 collapse

buffoon

Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 20:29 collapse

Trump is not buff.

mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 21:29 collapse

Definitely not. Nor is he a small, pixie like creature

Dearth@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 20:37 collapse

Someone asked chatGPT how to apply tariffs to give America an equal playing field and it spit it a formula that looks shockingly similar to how trump calculated the tariffs

WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 20:52 collapse

Try grok and you’ll get an exact match.