World’s ‘warmongers’ must end disdain for global order, UN chief insists
(news.un.org)
from schizoidman@lemm.ee to world@lemmy.world on 25 Feb 2025 08:25
https://lemm.ee/post/56577174
from schizoidman@lemm.ee to world@lemmy.world on 25 Feb 2025 08:25
https://lemm.ee/post/56577174
cross-posted from: lemm.ee/post/56577168
#world
threaded - newest
What’s a Warm Onger?
Typo. Perhaps they meant a warm onager.
Could give him a wee coat, especially if it’s going to be cold overnight :3
That makes more sense. We have all heard of wild Asian asses advocating for a NWO. Warm ones are particularly aggressive.
Expected siege engine; was disappointed.
I mean, you could employ them siege weapons. If you have enough of them. An an imagination.
I hope we all survive this Trump bullshit without becoming vassals of the blyats and Pooh.
If you could only reason with unreasonable people .
If all it took was a UN letter to the manager, we wouldn’t be in this position. Laws without enforcement are called wishes.
“must”, … or what??
Pretentious idiocy.
Mental-rabies NEEDS to be dealt-with AS mental-rabies.
Ideology/prejudice/“religion” which prohibits objectivity, & is identity-anchor, HAS to be dealt-with as functionally subhuman: mere-animal mind/determination,
because it IS mere-animal mind: the imprint->reaction mind of unreasoning herdbeasts, of unreasoning pack-animals.
Continuing to pretend that ideology/prejudice/“religion”‘s programming is “reasonable” & reason-WITH-able, … is simply us making ourselves into helpers of their slaughtering our own children: it is outright criminality.
Churchill, who simultaneously was prejudiced-scum who enforced lots of needless destruction-of-life in India AND he was the guy who held the West together during WW2
Anyways, as Churchill identified, there is zero point in arguing-with, or reasoning-with, either drunks or fanatics.
More-properly-resolved, it is the imprint->reaction mind that there isn’t any point in treating as “rational”.
Kahneman1 mind ( lower-forebrain, ttbomk ).
IF someone demonstrates that they’re solidly within imprint->reaction mind, disallowing/ignoring/denying evidence, correct-reasoning, etc, THEN accept that, deal-with that, & treat them as incapable-of-rationality human-shaped-animals.
MANAGE THEM, DO NOT LET THEIR WON’T-KNOW MANAGE US!!
Suspending that decision endlessly, helps them to slaughter our lives.
& I’m fed-up with pretending otherwise being treated as “the only valid position”.
WHEN DEALING-WITH RABIES, TREAT IT AS RABIES.
WHEN DEALING-WITH WON’T-KNOW-EVIDENCE/WON’T-REASON, TREAT IT AS IDEOLOGICAL-PREJUDICE.
To be honest, I don’t expect much of humankind to survive the next-century, if any does, simply because pretending/ignoring/denying is sooo fundamentally preferred to actual-honesty/objectivity.
“Actions speak louder than words” people say … but “words are more valid than actions” is what our “journalism” and our “governing” and our pseudo-accountability and our legal-systems etc all enforce/“prove”/enact.
Only when there are nearly-no-human-lives-left will that be force-changed??
Possible…
Too bad for the future-generations, but that’s our-generation’s determination, isn’t it?
Better to murder-off all their future-lives, than to have spine/integrity now?
sickening, repugnant, but … proudly-committed-by-many, now.
“Accelerationists”, especially.
they “must” do this, or that … OR WHAT??
FORCE consequences, morons, or allow them to slaughter us all.
“governing”, my arse.
Occupying-authority-while-NOT-governing<