Trump says US to start blockading the Strait of Hormuz immediately (www.reuters.com)
from throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to world@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 13:11
https://lemmy.nz/post/36432448

#world

threaded - newest

Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org on 12 Apr 13:12 next collapse

Wasn’t Iran already doing that before and wasn’t the main goal to open it up again?

magnue@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 13:17 next collapse

Yeah but if they say it this way it sounds like they’re in control of the situation

Eril@feddit.org on 12 Apr 16:10 collapse

It’s so in a few days he can “re-open” the strait again, declaring that everything is back to normal: “No president ever opened as many straits as I did”

mctoasterson@reddthat.com on 12 Apr 13:18 next collapse

The idea being to choke off Iran’s ability to use it at all. This kills their remaining income stream and also incents the Chinese and others who thought they had a workaround (the tolls) to instead put pressure on Iran.

marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today on 12 Apr 13:27 next collapse

…You understand Iran has more revenue streams and can overland oil and materials to china… right?

MartianSands@sh.itjust.works on 12 Apr 13:56 next collapse

The fact that it’s a bad idea doesn’t mean that isn’t the reason

marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today on 12 Apr 14:03 collapse

Possibly but that would mean the trump admin (and by extension congress) still are operating on less intelligence than anyone with an internet connection.

PoastRotato@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 14:40 collapse

This is not news

plyth@feddit.org on 12 Apr 14:02 collapse

Are the pipelines still operational?

ripcord@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 14:40 next collapse

The idea being to kill off Iran’s leverage, which is control of the Strait.

NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works on 12 Apr 16:01 next collapse

But that only works if the US is willing to start attacking unarmed oil tankers, which will do no favors for their international support.

If they hadn’t alienated all their allies, they could build an embargo until the straits were opened but that ship had sailed.

humanspiral@lemmy.ca on 12 Apr 17:06 collapse

China is both extremely well supplied with Oil, and aggressively weaning itself off of oil. It’s everyone else in Asia who are now pressured to get closer to China from this. Asia cutting US off from Chips, and selling to China instead, until US leaves the Gulf region, is the most effective action. Diplomatically, asserting that the US/Israel illegal war is the primary source of fuel and helium shortages needed to make chips, industry needs to focus on serving friendly country needs first.

humanspiral@lemmy.ca on 12 Apr 16:32 collapse

In Hegseth’s voice… Why can’t you idiots understand how clear our, sorry I mean our great President’s, mission has always been. We needed to start this excursion, because Iran was about to extort the world through a blockade. It’s extortion when Iran does it. We are liberating the world when we extort, uhm … uhm… liberate them from Iranian extortion. To pre-empt some of the news you will hear later this week. Iran was already threatening the region with opening Trump branded golf courses on its soil, and so America needed to make sure our friends in the region did so before hand. Radical left wing media not understanding that we won the war because 10 more Trump golf courses are opening in Gulf and 0 in Iran, just don’t understand that freedom isn’t free.

ryper@lemmy.ca on 12 Apr 13:17 next collapse

“Effective immediately, the ​United States Navy, the Finest in ​the World, will begin the process of BLOCKADING ‌any ⁠and all Ships trying to enter, or leave, the Strait of Hormuz,” said Trump, who is strongly opposed to the ​idea of ​Iran charging ⁠ships a toll to pass through the strait.

“I have also ​instructed our Navy to seek and ​interdict ⁠every vessel in International Waters that has paid a toll to Iran. No one ⁠who ​pays an illegal toll ​will have safe passage on the high seas,” he ​said.

Pretty sure what Trump is opposed to is him not getting a cut of the toll.

KoboldCoterie@pawb.social on 12 Apr 13:19 next collapse

He did previously say that as the “winners” of the war, the US was entitled to collect that toll, basically. So, yeah, I think you’re spot on.

floofloof@lemmy.ca on 12 Apr 13:20 next collapse

Once again the whole world has to suffer because of Trump’s insatiable ego and greed, and his bottomless stupidity. May he be gone soon.

[deleted] on 12 Apr 13:24 next collapse
.
yesman@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 13:55 collapse

Lot’s of people avoid using the word retard. But that’s hard on some people because the loss of that word can decimate their whole vocabulary.

I support your freedom of expression; language is hard, and some people need verbal prognostics to make their point. It’s rude to pick on people just because of a diminished capacity.

random_character_a@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 15:35 next collapse

By calling out the decline of Trumps cognitive abilities, I offended subset of people who should in my view never ever be called a “retard”?

I do apologise to anyone who still wants to identify as one.

[deleted] on 12 Apr 17:36 next collapse
.
athatet@lemmy.zip on 12 Apr 18:02 collapse

It’s just not necessary to use slurs. That’s all.

athatet@lemmy.zip on 12 Apr 18:02 collapse

My vocab is diminished because I don’t use slurs? That sounds like an incredible trade off. I think I will keep it up.

crusa187@lemmy.ml on 12 Apr 13:39 next collapse

One of his many word salads involved an offer to split the tolls between us and Iran, so yeah, that’s what he wants. The dummy simply didn’t realize access to the strait was so valuable until after the bombs started dropping.

SilverCode@lemmy.ml on 12 Apr 14:43 next collapse

Illegal toll? Who’s laws govern the strait that make these tolls illegal?

Typhoon@lemmy.ca on 12 Apr 16:09 collapse

International law says that any toll is illegal.

ThePantser@sh.itjust.works on 12 Apr 14:45 next collapse

No one ⁠who ​pays an illegal toll ​will have safe passage on the high seas

Does that mean they are gonna attack anyone that paid? Also when he starts charging does that mean they will destroy any ships right after they pay?

andrewrgross@slrpnk.net on 12 Apr 15:40 next collapse

This is truly an April Fools-level move.

The US is closing the Strait? The generals couldn’t open it, so Hegseth said, ‘Okay! I’ve got it! We declare that WE’RE closing it, NOT THEM!’

How … is this better?

stickyprimer@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 18:39 collapse

Iran was allowing some ships through. The logic is that if it’s closed to the US it must be closed to everyone (it was not before).

Do I think this is a good move? No. Do I think Trump and Hegseth have three brain cells between them? No.

But it also isn’t hard to understand their angle here. It’s not better for anyone. But the idea is to make it worse for Iran than the previous phase, where they had control of the strait.

andrewrgross@slrpnk.net on 12 Apr 19:36 collapse

I get the logic. But it’s still really dumb.

fartographer@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 17:28 collapse

Oh good. Nazi pirates. How did we end up with a real life plot more stupid than Water World?

ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com on 12 Apr 13:18 next collapse

He wants the money, that Iran wasn’t charging before he invaded, for himself is as near I can figure. Master negotiator with a grand plan.

JaumeI@programming.dev on 12 Apr 13:30 next collapse

Isn’t that… piracy? Not USAs waters, not USAs petrol…

Pickleideas@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 13:33 next collapse

Hasn’t stopped them from stealing oil from Venezuela and Cuba

JaumeI@programming.dev on 12 Apr 15:38 collapse

Sure it hasn’t. But now they are ruining the pockets of the whole world.

Typhoon@lemmy.ca on 12 Apr 16:11 collapse

Expect it to continue because he isn’t going to stop while he has power.

JaumeI@programming.dev on 12 Apr 16:25 collapse

Our only hope is that Europe and China get tired of the crybaby and begin to do something for real, I guess.

Typhoon@lemmy.ca on 12 Apr 17:06 collapse

Yeah. It’s obvious the Americans won’t do anything.

flandish@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 13:37 next collapse

no. it’s invasion and war.

JaumeI@programming.dev on 12 Apr 15:38 collapse

Yes , but now they are the ones making everyone’s petrol much more expensive, if it even gets there.

flandish@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 16:49 collapse

yes and. :)

JaumeI@programming.dev on 12 Apr 17:11 collapse

One can hope than (sadly) onlu then, some countries might intervene for real.

flandish@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 18:23 collapse

i fuckin hope so. last time it took a few million russians to take down berlin. dc is a bit more of a walk.

rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works on 12 Apr 13:52 collapse

Sure sounds like it’s more piracy to me.

rayyy@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 13:33 next collapse

That’s bound to increase the price of oil.

roguetrick@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 13:34 next collapse

Jesus Christ. I certainly didn’t have this on my rapidly flailing bingo card of the US punching itself in the face.

orlyowl@piefed.ca on 12 Apr 13:35 next collapse

This is a terrifyingly ridiculous timeline we find ourselves in.

Klox@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 13:41 next collapse

Lmfao, the guy knows a thing or two about illegal taxation extortion.

HubertManne@piefed.social on 12 Apr 13:47 next collapse

this goes back to are trumps decisions based on some long odd bets on the totally not maninpualted gambling markets.

Akh@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 13:48 next collapse

He cant blockade something controlled by someone else who already shut it.

FancyPantsFIRE@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 14:55 collapse

“You can’t quit, you’re fired!”

stephan262@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 16:59 collapse

Well if you’re going to fire me, I’m gonna fire the warehouse.

BigMacHole@thelemmy.club on 12 Apr 13:55 next collapse

Open Close the STRAIT!

-Trump!

CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de on 12 Apr 14:03 next collapse

I guess now we find out how defensible the strait

If Iran can close it thoroughly, they can also keep the US Navy pretty busy. How many Shahed does it take to disable a destroyer? We will find out.

humanspiral@lemmy.ca on 12 Apr 17:11 collapse

The US can blockade the entrance to Persian Gulf which is further away from Iran. Oil tankers are lightly armed/defended and slower than Aircraft carrier fighter jets.

hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 12 Apr 14:57 next collapse

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/f3f7b704-a1e8-4d51-9725-cc8d9ea94eea.webp">

Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works on 12 Apr 15:39 collapse

Lol is that a sea mine XD

MonsterMonster@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 14:59 next collapse

And the twist in the plot is that Iran unblocks the Strait of Hormuz.

finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 15:11 next collapse

Is it my imagination, or is that stretch of water and the water surrounding it not US territory, thus making what he wants to do (interdict) kind of … piracy?

Eric@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 12 Apr 19:32 collapse

Blockading is considered an act of war

rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works on 12 Apr 15:21 next collapse

“Effective immediately, the ​United States Navy, the Finest in ​the World, will begin the process of BLOCKADING ‌any ⁠and all Ships trying to enter, or leave, the Strait of Hormuz,”

Or what?

Wataba@sh.itjust.works on 12 Apr 15:31 next collapse

The American military are legitimate targets.

whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 12 Apr 16:01 next collapse

Art of the idiot

Upgrayedd1776@sh.itjust.works on 12 Apr 16:22 collapse
jacksilver@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 16:54 next collapse

Im surprised by the comments here, this was an obvious outcome of Iran dictating that only Iranian interests could use the strait. The only real move for the US is to block all traffic (or at least all traffic heading to Iran). Why would the US allow Iran to continue to sell oil while Iran is destroying other ships.

I’m sure the GCC have no issue with this policy, and it doesn’t really change the situation for most other US aligned countries as they weren’t buying Iranian oil for the most part anyways. No one wants Iran to be able to charge for access to the Strait and this would put pressure on the to find a more agreeable end to the conflict.

Not supporting either side, just stating that this is a reasonable strategic move for the US.

roguetrick@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 17:19 next collapse

Because the US cannot both declare freedom of navigation as the most important part of the straight while also blockading non-US allies which they’ve explicitly threatened to do. If you approach it from a realpolitik angle like you are right now, then it justifies Iran’s actions in closing the straight from that very perspective. The US will not get to have it both ways. Either Iran was justified in closing the straight in response to US aggression or the US is violating international law and general principles of trade.

jacksilver@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 19:28 collapse

You make it sound like blockades are not common events during a war. Just cause the US is blockading the strait right now doesn’t negate their desire for free passage in the future.

Additionally, if people didn’t think Iran was justified in closing the strait (due to a war) then they probably wouldn’t be negotiating with them for access.

This is what happens during war, both sides look for ways to create pressure on the other to force them to the table. Iran is fighting an uphill battle so needs to turn people against the US by limiting oil shipments, but that doesn’t mean the US is just going to let them keep selling their oil.

humanspiral@lemmy.ca on 12 Apr 17:27 collapse

Why would the US allow Iran to continue to sell oil while Iran is destroying other ships.

To keep oil prices from rising too high, with whole countries running dry. While GOP will portray it as 100% democrats fault, west coast runs out of jet fuel in a week or so.

Something Iran can do to force GCC to demand an end to war within 10 days is to destroy all desalination infrastructure

No one wants Iran to be able to charge for access to the Strait and this would put pressure on the to find a more agreeable end to the conflict.

It is a legal response to an illegal war. Reparations paid to Iran (normally by US) that US adoring colonies can pay instead would satisfy Iran’s revenue generation/compensation rationale.

friend_of_satan@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 17:02 next collapse

Open the fucking strait you crazy bastard!

GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone on 12 Apr 17:06 next collapse

I think he’s just pissed off that Iran is letting Chinese ships thorough. So now the question is whether Trump is stupid and deranged enough to attack any Chinese ships that ignore this illegal blockade, which would probably kick off World War 3 in earnest.

gdog05@lemmy.world on 12 Apr 17:18 next collapse

There are a lot of people who want this level of destabilization and interruption of goods and energy security. Techno feudalists want this. Trump needs to feel powerful, so someone like Peter Theil who is trying to bring about Armageddon could easily convince Trump that this move makes him look powerful instead of a target by the rest of the world.

redsand@infosec.pub on 12 Apr 18:40 next collapse

<img alt="1000004815" src="https://infosec.pub/pictrs/image/4f4ddcad-3625-4fb0-81c3-c01f8e3c991a.jpeg">

Steve@startrek.website on 12 Apr 18:42 collapse

What a stupid piece of shit