Trump considers forcing journalists to reveal sources who leaked Iran report (www.theguardian.com)
from babysandpiper@sopuli.xyz to world@lemmy.world on 29 Jun 22:52
https://sopuli.xyz/post/29640109

Trump dismisses leaked assessment suggesting strikes only temporarily disrupted Iran’s nuclear development

Donald Trump said he is weighing forcing journalists who published leaked details from a US intelligence report assessing the impact of the recent American military strikes on Iran to reveal their sources – and the president also claimed his administration may prosecute those reporters and sources if they don’t comply.

In an interview Sunday with Fox News host Maria Bartiromo, Trump doubled down on his claim that the 21 June airstrikes aimed at certain Iranian facilities successfully crippled Iran’s nuclear program. He insisted the attacks destroyed key enriched uranium stockpiles, despite Iranian assertions that the material had been relocated before the strikes.

Trump dismissed the leaked intelligence assessment in question – which suggested the strikes only temporarily disrupted Iran’s nuclear development – as incomplete and biased. The report, circulated among US lawmakers and intelligence officials, concluded that the damage inflicted was significantly less than what Trump’s administration had publicly claimed.

#world

threaded - newest

WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 29 Jun 22:58 next collapse

For some reason, he seems extra butthurt about getting caught lying this time.

ChicoSuave@lemmy.world on 29 Jun 23:37 next collapse

It’s because fascists always have to be right and be the strongest. So strong that any resistance means destruction and the only path of survival is to fall in line.

He insisted the attacks destroyed key enriched uranium stockpiles, despite Iranian assertions that the material had been relocated before the strikes.

Trump dismissed the leaked intelligence assessment in question – which suggested the strikes only temporarily disrupted Iran’s nuclear development – as incomplete and biased.

Not only is he not as strong as he says, he looks downright weak. It’s personally dangerous to his image and is a test of power to those within the GOP. He needs complete loyalty so others will follow his orders without question. But the question is now “is it worth it?”

And there were real believers within the GOP who wanted to avoid WW3 or a nuclear engagement only to see AIPAC have more pull than actual Americans in the deployment of American muscle. Trump needs to keep those stragglers in line or risk having a shattered party that can’t do anything but in-fight over the next 3 years.

He’s fighting this so hard because this is a fight for his future.

[deleted] on 30 Jun 00:00 next collapse
.
dastanktal@lemmy.ml on 30 Jun 02:28 collapse

I really really hope he loses this fight.

sfxrlz@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 30 Jun 10:29 collapse

Well he is losing imo but to who. It’s not democracy.

[deleted] on 30 Jun 00:12 next collapse
.
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world on 30 Jun 01:43 collapse

that’s because the narrative was important to their long-term goals and has not only ruined the months of setup, but also wasted the efforts.

he’s a really lazy man and hates working.

Mohamed@lemmy.ca on 29 Jun 23:45 next collapse

That’s called a subpeona, Mr. Trump.

credo@lemmy.world on 29 Jun 23:53 next collapse

Maybe it was Iran?

timewarp@lemmy.world on 30 Jun 00:00 next collapse

That’s how you know the intelligence is accurate.

jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works on 30 Jun 00:52 next collapse

Reporters should all just say it was Don Jr.

InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world on 30 Jun 03:32 next collapse

They should say it was Pete Opsec

mPony@kbin.earth on 30 Jun 10:40 collapse

it was the coke talking

Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world on 30 Jun 01:18 next collapse

It was Pete Hegseth in a Signal group Biatch

mPony@kbin.earth on 30 Jun 10:34 collapse

in his defense he was, and continues to be, a weak-willed simpering bitch

throbbing_banjo@lemmy.world on 30 Jun 10:38 collapse

A drunk weak-willed simpering bitch

[deleted] on 03 Jul 14:24 collapse
.
engene@lemmy.ca on 30 Jun 01:46 next collapse

Truth hurts MF 🤬

Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world on 30 Jun 01:54 next collapse

Our source was Mr. Lickma

MuskyMelon@lemmy.world on 30 Jun 02:01 next collapse

It was Hegseth thru a Signal group again

[deleted] on 03 Jul 14:30 collapse
.
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world on 30 Jun 02:08 next collapse

The funny part is the leak could only have come from inside his administration and party because he withheld briefings from his political opponents

BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world on 30 Jun 06:32 collapse

It could still be from a Dem added to a Signal chat

Witchfire@lemmy.world on 30 Jun 06:33 collapse

Oh is that what that random group chat was last week?

But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world on 30 Jun 07:05 next collapse

They forgot to hang up after ordering the pizzas. Domino’s guy heard the whole thing.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 30 Jun 07:28 next collapse

hegseth already leaks through his alcoholic breath.

FuglyDuck@lemmy.world on 30 Jun 21:28 collapse

Seriously.

Somebody should put a breathalyzer interlock device in that guys mic. And his devices for posting.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 01 Jul 06:59 collapse

probably can smell the alcohol from his breath, no breathealyzer needed.

FuglyDuck@lemmy.world on 01 Jul 07:34 collapse

You’re not wrong, but like. Imagine, if you will, Hegseth needing to be sober to speak into a microphone or tweet something out. Or otherwise be a SecDef.

IzzyScissor@lemmy.world on 30 Jun 19:38 next collapse

“That’s not true! … Who told!?”

sunbytes@lemmy.world on 01 Jul 14:14 collapse

“force” in this case means “extort information” or just straight up applied violence, I assume.