Netflix must refund customers for years of price hikes, Italian court rules (arstechnica.com)
from roserose56@lemmy.zip to world@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 17:53
https://lemmy.zip/post/61914326

#world

threaded - newest

MrSmoothPP@lemmy.zip on 03 Apr 17:55 next collapse

Haha get owned Netflix

vk6flab@lemmy.radio on 03 Apr 17:56 next collapse

Yeah … that’s never going to happen.

Casanunda@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 18:07 collapse

Wdym? Court ordered them to pay.

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 18:08 collapse

And they’re appealing. And what’s the court gonna do, fine them less than they would have to pay out?

Casanunda@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 19:02 next collapse

I’m not an Italian lawyer, but I’m pretty sure appeals can be rejected. And hopefully this one will be.

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 19:07 next collapse

Hope for the best, expect the worst.

frongt@lemmy.zip on 03 Apr 19:21 collapse

Fines can also be increased on appeal.

qyron@sopuli.xyz on 03 Apr 19:11 next collapse

Start an example?

Considering consumer laws are pretty good in Europe and jurisprudence tends to set example in the euro-space, it may cause other countries to do the exact same thing.

The company may appeal. It may even win. But the bad publicity hurts. And if they lose, it gets even worse, as it will have to pay what it is being demanded.

Or not pay and get fines on top of that.

Deestan@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 19:21 collapse

Appealing doesn’t get them out of paying.

TheTechnician27@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 18:37 next collapse

Sanitized link without the UTM parameter:

arstechnica.com/…/netflix-ordered-to-refund-subsc…

verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr on 03 Apr 19:43 collapse

A small victory for civilisation against the Uruk.