Zelenskyy: Russia no longer exports but imports petrol and that's our achievement (www.pravda.com.ua)
from MicroWave@lemmy.world to world@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 10:53
https://lemmy.world/post/36870553

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has stated that Russia is importing petrol, calling it the rightful result of the work of the Security Service, the Armed Forces, intelligence and Ukrainian weapons manufacturers.

Quote: "Today, there were also reports on our entirely justified strikes against Russian targets – against their logistics and fuel infrastructure. I am grateful to our warriors for their precision. Russia chooses war, Russia destroys our people’s lives, and must be held accountable – our long-range capabilities will increase.

#world

threaded - newest

Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk on 04 Oct 11:18 next collapse

Noice

x00z@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 11:45 next collapse

Time to focus on other parts of their infrastructure.

Asetru@feddit.org on 04 Oct 11:57 next collapse

Nah. This works. It’s a good focus to keep.

[deleted] on 04 Oct 12:17 next collapse
.
kokesh@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 12:18 collapse

And putin. Someone should take that fuck out.

A_norny_mousse@feddit.org on 04 Oct 12:40 next collapse

Not for lack of trying I’m sure, but he’s a paranoid little fucker.

psx_crab@lemmy.zip on 04 Oct 13:32 next collapse

Didn’t he have a bunker somewhere no one know? Unless someone he trusted do it, there’s no way to be close to him to actually do it.

drhodl@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 21:04 collapse

Being such a midget runt, makes him a hard target LOL.

bacon_pdp@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 11:50 next collapse

Effectively Ukraine is doing more to help the US economy than its own Executive Branch.

Formfiller@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 12:44 next collapse

Executive branch is too busy orchestrating a genocide

Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 04 Oct 16:47 collapse

While being the chief supplier and apologist for another.

rammer@sopuli.xyz on 04 Oct 12:56 next collapse

Effectively Ukraine is doing more to lessen the production of petrol than any other country.

mgnome@piefed.social on 04 Oct 13:04 next collapse

We also have most of our thermal power firebombed by ruskies, so biggest part of our energy generation is nuclear and renewables now. Yay ecology!

OriginalUsername7@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 14:12 next collapse

The first carbon neutral war since the invention of gun powder.

Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 05 Oct 16:16 collapse

Nuclear sucks tho. Too expensive, shitty when bombed, requires mining and still no way to deal with the trash. (Lemmy nuclear bootsuckers please save yourself the energy to talk about reactors reusing the trash. They are experimental and dont produce energy yet)

mgnome@piefed.social on 05 Oct 17:13 collapse

I wouldn’t necessarily agree with all that, but one thing’s still clear - I’d rather not have nuclear power in country with that monkey with grenade of a neighbour that is Russia.

wewbull@feddit.uk on 04 Oct 19:03 collapse

I think they might have increased air pollution in the short term.

DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org on 04 Oct 14:20 next collapse

Did they even say thank you?

phutatorius@lemmy.zip on 04 Oct 21:22 collapse

I want to live to see the day where JD Vance is forced, on his hands and knees, to say thank you.

betanumerus@lemmy.ca on 04 Oct 16:58 next collapse

Ukraine is a front line for the entire West. Of course it helps the US. It has taken donny 10 years to understand what anyone can read from a wiki article in less than an hour.

_stranger_@lemmy.world on 05 Oct 17:56 collapse
fort_burp@feddit.nl on 05 Oct 16:08 collapse

The US economy? How do you figure that?

Mihies@programming.dev on 04 Oct 11:51 next collapse

Isn’t Russian economy based mainly on oil export? If that’s true, then it should collapse soon. I a little bit doubt that it’ll actually happen soon, though.

WanderingThoughts@europe.pub on 04 Oct 12:07 next collapse

They’re still exporting but it’s crude oil instead of refined product now so a lot less profitable.

wewbull@feddit.uk on 04 Oct 19:09 next collapse

They’re exporting crude on the cheap (due to sanctions) and buying back market rate refined fuels. They’re losing twice on it.

phutatorius@lemmy.zip on 04 Oct 22:08 collapse

Russia has a moderately high cost of production and transportation for oil, so yeah, they’re not making easy money selling crude.

A_norny_mousse@feddit.org on 04 Oct 12:43 next collapse

It’s hard to get definite info from there, but some experts* say the economy is way worse off than what they show the West.

OTOH China is helping them…

* and I mean that unironically.

Mihies@programming.dev on 04 Oct 13:23 next collapse

That’s quite probable. Also even help from China is probably not sustainable. Let’s hope it crumbles, the sooner the better.

Xartle@lemmy.ml on 04 Oct 15:09 collapse

It looks to me like China isn’t really interested in helping Russia win. They are helping Russia just enough to keep fighting and throwing away, well, everything.

nednobbins@lemmy.zip on 04 Oct 18:13 next collapse

It becomes fairly obvious when you think about what the likely effects would be.

Let’s say Russia achieves all it’s military obejctevies; they crush the Ukrainian military, the remaining civilian population offers an unconditional surrender, and Russia is able to completely annex Ukraine. Then what?

Then China’s biggest and most powerful neighbor would be even bigger and more powerful. Once hostilities ceased, Russia would slowly be able to start selling oil to the rest of the world again so China wouldn’t get as good a deal and the negotiations on Power of Siberia would get more complicated.

Where is the upside for China?

wewbull@feddit.uk on 04 Oct 19:13 next collapse

China has been watching go try to get an impression of the west’s reaction to the invasion. They want to be able to predict what will happen when they go into Taiwan.

Roll over, or full blown shooting war with the USA?

RenLinwood@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 04 Oct 20:45 next collapse

Delusional, China will simply wait out the impending collapse of the US and the ensuing end of our support for the current Taiwanese regime, after which peaceful reunification will be an inevitability. The US desperately wants China to do something stupid, as a justification for our aggressive foreign policy & to generate international support/repair our damaged reputation, which is exactly why they won’t.

phutatorius@lemmy.zip on 04 Oct 22:22 collapse

It’s comical that so many people believe that the CCP is led by wise visionaries rather than power-mad, corrupt gangsters who cling to power by any means available to them, and are constantly shit-scared that their own people will someday see how much they’ve been conned and rise up against them.

RenLinwood@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 04 Oct 23:17 collapse

Doesn’t take a visionary to outwit the US lol, all they have to do is stay the course they’ve been following for decades. This is pure projection.

nednobbins@lemmy.zip on 04 Oct 21:35 collapse

Why would China need Russia to win in Ukraine to gauge the West’s reaction? They’ve already seen the reaction to an invasion.

China has repeatedly shown that they have a much better tool against Taiwan than an invasion. Every time they want to rattle their sabre at Taiwan they blockade the entire island. They’ve done it many times and nobody does anything about it. Nobody has any realistic proposals on what they would do about it. Taiwan is a very densely populated island. It will run out of just about everything very quickly.

drhodl@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 21:03 collapse

Much of far eastern ruzzia has original chinese names. If anyone thinks China wants Taiwan back, how do you think they feel about Far Eastern ruzzia? LOL. China is just waiting for ruzzia to finish exhausting themselves, and then maybe ruzzia won’t be the biggest country by land mass anymore. Siberia, and a big chunk of the Arctic also hold much allure for the chinese. Japan should grab Sakhalin and the Kuriles, too. The location of Pootin the Midgets grave, will become ruzzia’s saliva and urine National Reserve.

nednobbins@lemmy.zip on 04 Oct 21:26 next collapse

If China wanted to invade Russia. Why would they want Russia to win a war first? Why would it be easier for China to wait for hundreds of thousands of troops to be freed up. If China wanted to invade Russia, it’s hard to think of a better time than right now. They would be caught with their entire army on the wrong side of the country and most of the world lined up to support China, or at least stay out of the way. The only deterrent is Russia’s nuclear arsenal and that wouldn’t go away after a victory in Ukraine either.

drhodl@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 21:32 collapse

I have bad news for you. China isn’t actually waiting for “russia to win a war first”. They are sitting back, encouraging and aiding ruzzia to use ALL of it’s resources and abilities, and become even weaker in the process. Then, when ruzzia is negligible soon, it might be time to repay some historical insults, hey? And, if by some million to one chance, ruzzia wins against Ukraine, well, China can use that in it’s Taiwan strategy. It’s a win either way, for China. China also has nukes, and I’d bet theirs will work, unlike the ruzzian ones that haven’t been maintained for decades because ruzzian generals all need cash.

nednobbins@lemmy.zip on 04 Oct 21:40 collapse

Then why did you bring it up? My entire post was an argument that China has no incentive to want Russia to win the war. Did you intend to respond to some other post?

phutatorius@lemmy.zip on 04 Oct 22:19 collapse

Russia and China are two ancient empires with a long-ass border. Of course, ther’ll be rivalry, since neither state has abandoned its imperialist ambitions.

drhodl@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 20:57 collapse

It will be hilarious when China takes back far Eastern ruzzia, and maybe Siberia and a chunk of the Arctic too. Pootin the midget has well and truly fucked his pariah country forever. Ruzzia will be paying reparations for all time, and the location of Pootangs grave will be forgotten

wewbull@feddit.uk on 04 Oct 19:11 collapse

Of course. When you’re waging war you don’t show weakness to your enemy.

What I find stunning is how little clue the standard Russian citizen has. They know there are fuel shortage but they don’t know why.

phutatorius@lemmy.zip on 04 Oct 22:10 collapse

What I find stunning is how little clue the standard Russian citizen has.

Look at what the propaganda networks have achieved in the US. Those techniques were largely developed in Russia.

Mihies@programming.dev on 04 Oct 13:24 next collapse

Makes sense.

drhodl@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 20:53 next collapse

They are spending their export earnings, to import refined petroleum products now, ROFL. And you better believe that Ukraine will be targeting import facilities and infrastructure soon…

Imagine an oil economy that has to import oil products, hehe. What an unmitigated fail that ruzzia, and their midget dicktator is…

phutatorius@lemmy.zip on 04 Oct 22:07 collapse

The Russian economy now is largely based on providing war mateiriel. Russia’s export earnings are heavily dependent on fossil-fuel exports, though, and they have to import both finished and raw materials to keep military production going. Those have to be paid for, and hardly anyone wants roubles.

Bullerfar@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 12:11 next collapse

I find it really “eye opening” to watch a “small” country like Ukraine, just demolish a huge behemoth almost all on their own. Yes they got support from USA, that helped them survive a lot of the first invasion wave, where russia wasn’t prepared for the resistance they were getting do to bad serveilance reportings, of the russian KGP. But after a lot of the help they are getting from their allies, they have been innovating and forcing themselves out of this.

This is the modern version of David and Goliath. Ukraine has revolutionized modern warfare completely.

FerretyFever0@fedia.io on 04 Oct 12:21 next collapse

It seems to be similar to the Vietnam War (besides the distances ofc). The US lost that because none of the soldiers actually cared about going to fight in Vietnam, nobody cared about winning. It might be a similar story with Russia. What stakes do the Russian people face if they lose? What does Ukraine have to lose?

mgnome@piefed.social on 04 Oct 13:00 next collapse

It’s a bit different as Russian indifference is also what made this war be possible in the first place.

I mean, back in ’22 Russian opposition mostly had to flee abroad, but broadcasted news of Russian war crimes, commenting that Russian citizens should know the truth.

Now we know they know. It’s just that nobody cares until it affects them personally.

BilSabab@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 19:17 collapse

it is not even the first generation of russian opposition that failed at that. They played dumb when Transnistria situation happened, they didn’t gave a shit when russia started a proxy war with Georgia by fueling the separatist movements, they couldn’t be bothered with Karabakh thing, lots of them openly supported military invasion of Ichkeria that tried to secede according to international law only to be laughed at, they played the “it’s very ambiguous” during the August 8 invasion even there was nothing ambiguous. russian opposition was politically irrelevant long before that and their fate as absolutely inadequate play-pretend clownshow was cemented when most of them decided to feign ignorance and sit on the fence over Crimea annexation and then their leaders started speculating over that with sandwich rhetoric which was deeply idiotic and counterproductive.

Bullerfar@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 14:48 next collapse

True

phutatorius@lemmy.zip on 04 Oct 21:36 collapse

nobody cared about winning

That was an unwinnable war. China supported North Vietnam, with which it shared a long border. The US was fighting thousands of miles from its borders, with all the logistical problems that entailed, and was not willing or able to engage China directly in the fighting-- they had recently tried that in the Korean war and barely managed to achieve a stalemate at a high cost in lives. The South Vietnamese government was a former French colonial puppet regime that was rotten to the core, the South Vietnamese soldiers knew that and had no desire to die for those parasites or for the US’s obscure objectives. The North Vietnamese soldiers had to either fight and win or be massacred by either the US or their own government. So they cared about winning, since for them it was an existential imperative. American draftees had more options than that.

But I agree that your analysis that the cost of failure to the sides in that war was massively asymmetric is indeed also applicable to Russia and Ukraine.

whereyaaat@lemmings.world on 04 Oct 12:40 next collapse

demolish

Ok buddy…

This is the modern version of David and Goliath.

🤦

SkyezOpen@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 13:02 collapse

Russia was considered to be the second most powerful military in the world. They now have suffered over a million casualties and are currently unable to prevent their own oil facilities from exploding on a weekly basis.

whereyaaat@lemmings.world on 04 Oct 13:04 collapse

And yet they haven’t left. Doesn’t sound like they got “demolished.”

You both are just spouting gung-ho bullshit as virtue signaling for the tribe.

brucethemoose@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 14:09 next collapse

The war can be both devastating for Russia and an ongoing grind.

That itself is not unprecedented. Large militaries have horrifically ground themselves down against smaller, determined foes for literally thousands of years.

Doorbook@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 15:02 next collapse

Amazing replies, they say Ukraine got support from US like it was a few thousand, ignoring all the support during Biden, and from other countries.

drhodl@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 20:50 collapse

What? Like the support North Korea and China have been selling to the midget Pootin? Like the nice cash flow ruzzia is getting from India and other Brics countries, for whatever oil ruzzia can still transport? Like all the Iranian drones and drone technology that ruzzia can’t provide for itself? Like the battalions of (crappy) North Korean slaves that Pootin has welcomed for ruzzian cash. Even America has been helping ruzzia by keeping a leash on Ukraine, selectively providing intelligence information and even turning off their internet at times. America sent some if’s old junk that needed to be decommissioned any way. It probably actually profited America to be able to dispose of that stuff cheaply LOL. Although it is hilarious that old American junk is more that ruzzia can handle ROFL. Too bad for the runt Pootang, but war in modern times, is a multinational affair, and ruzzia is on the Temu side LOL. I though you ruzzian orcs would be too embarrassed to show your vile heads any more, due to all the failure. It most be pure cringe, to be a ruzzian LOL.

RenLinwood@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 04 Oct 23:39 collapse

Jesus fucking cringe, I hope for your sake you’re being paid for this

Sideshow_B00b@lemmy.zip on 05 Oct 17:29 next collapse

How much is Ruzzian intelligence paying you tho?

drhodl@lemmy.world on 05 Oct 20:07 collapse

Cry harder into your morning vodka, Yuri !

Gerudo@lemmy.zip on 04 Oct 18:22 next collapse

Putin would appear weak if he walked away. Dictators don’t want to look weak. They would rather run the country into the ground than admit they were wrong.

biotin7@sopuli.xyz on 04 Oct 18:59 next collapse

They have drunk the kool-aid

drhodl@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 20:39 next collapse

They haven’t “left” because the midget Pootin is not the one doing the dying. Yet.

phutatorius@lemmy.zip on 04 Oct 22:03 collapse

And yet they haven’t left.

They haven’t left yet.

gezero@lemmy.bowyerhub.uk on 04 Oct 13:29 next collapse

Isn’t Ukraine second biggest European country after Russia?

Ava@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 04 Oct 13:47 next collapse

I don’t think they meant geographic size. In terms of population they’re around 9th, in terms of GDP more like 25th. They’re not Malta obviously, but they don’t really stack up against the big traditionally heavyweight countries by most metrics.

someguy3@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 14:06 next collapse

Ukraine is poor as fuck, it’s really surprising when you look at the numbers.

Bullerfar@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 14:37 collapse

Not citizen and economy wise.

Sektor@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 18:46 next collapse

Demolish how? Russia is still taking ground. We are entering into fourth year of war, and with the exception of Kursk campaign the line is moving only in one direction.

wewbull@feddit.uk on 04 Oct 19:06 next collapse

Russia hasn’t taken significant ground for years. The front line is stuck, entrenched and static. There might be variations by 10 metres here or there, but it’s basically the same today as 3 years ago.

phutatorius@lemmy.zip on 04 Oct 22:01 next collapse

Look at how the first world war ended. The front was frozen for about three years, then it suddenly came unstuck. What had changed was crumbling alliances on the Axis side, an increasingly difficult problem with fuel supply (hmm, that sounds familiar), and the need for Germany to maintain some level of military strength for internal repression. So what broke things loose was a gradual loss of German resiliency. That could happen to Russia, too, but it depends on international resolve that may or might not be sufficiently strong. In particular, it’s not clear if Trump is more interested in backstabbing Europe to ingratiate himself with Putin, or backstabbing Putin in order to claim credit for a victory that would actually largely be Zelenskyy’s.

Sektor@lemmy.world on 05 Oct 01:01 collapse

Three years ago they were fighting for Maruipol.

BilSabab@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 19:07 next collapse

just to clarify - taking ground with immense personnel and hardware losses over what it is rendered into a literal moonscape with no infrastructure or housings intact. good luck holding onto that.

Sektor@lemmy.world on 05 Oct 01:02 collapse

Good luck taking it back.

oatscoop@midwest.social on 04 Oct 19:17 next collapse

Taking land is the only way to win a war. Outlasting an opponent’s ability/will to fight doesn’t work at all, right?

Remind me: who controls Afghanistan? You know, that small country that didn’t even have a standing army who fought against the most powerful military on the planet for 20 years … after fighting the Soviets for 10.

Probably a fluke though – it’s not like that’s repeatedly happened in wars across history.

phutatorius@lemmy.zip on 04 Oct 21:51 next collapse

True. But also Afghanistan’s climate and terrain make it costly to occupy, and there was no comparable benefit to being there, besides possibly control of the opiate trade. And large-scale mechanized warfare was also horrendously difficult in Afghanistan, but much more possible in Ukraine and vicinity.

So the Russians left because there was nothing worth stealing that would justify the high casualty rate. The US fucked off because there was no reason to be there besides to slap the Taliban around and kill however many Al-Qaida fighters could be found. But the war aims for the US were never well-articulated, and that led to bizarre rules of engagement that could never achieve more than a holding pattern. The US could have stayed and exterminated every single Talib, but that would have almost inevitably spread the conflict to the Taliban’s sponsors, Pakistan, which has nukes (and a far larger popultation than Afghanistan). Not a good state to destablize.

Sektor@lemmy.world on 05 Oct 01:03 collapse

So you’re saying russians will just pack their things and leave?

Grapho@lemmy.ml on 04 Oct 19:27 next collapse

You’re wasting your time lmao. If they took Kyiv and jailed all the leadership these delusional libs would claim it’s just Russian propaganda and the real victory is just around the corner like it’s an avengers movie.

Evidence is beside the point, all that matters is vibes.

Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org on 04 Oct 22:46 collapse

.ml account

Grapho@lemmy.ml on 05 Oct 00:26 collapse

You’re commenting from the fucking “saying Palestine is illegal” instance, pipe down

Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org on 05 Oct 06:37 collapse

More .ml propaganda lmao

Palestine isn’t illegal, silly you :3

drhodl@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 20:33 collapse

Meatwave tactics do tend to gain ground, but the midget Pootin is starting to get desperate for warm bodies to send. Pootin the Tiny is resorting to tricking international students into signing up for the meatgrinder, and there are literal waves of ruzzian orcs attacking WHILE ON CRUTCHES! Ruzzian soldiers are encouraged to shoot their own wounded because ruzzia can’t afford to medically treat them, or pay pensions… Ruzzian weapons are proven crap, and getting crappier, and that’s a foreign market ruzzia will, NEVER get back. What ruzzian navy? ROFLOLOLOL!!! Ruzzia has run out of fuel (LOL) and is now an importer of gasoline, while Ukraine permits it. (Hint: Ukraine will be bombing import facilities and infrastructure very soon). The ruzzian economy is in the toilet and about to be flushed, ruzzian elites are grumbling audibly about midget Pootins failures… The entire next generation of ruzzians has fled overseas, or already been turned into sunflower fertilizer. Ruzzia is Donny 2 Inches “third world shithole country”, in every possible way. Third World Ruzzia should try to give their population actual flushing toilets and indoor plumbing, before they start and lose their next war ROFL. No wonder that every ruzzian woman is trying to find a western husband, because this is yet another destroyed generation of ruzzian men. Only the crippled and unemployable violent drunks are going to remain, to populate future ruzzia. What a genetic disaster, hey?

phutatorius@lemmy.zip on 04 Oct 21:52 collapse

Only the crippled and unemployable violent drunks are going to remain

As opposed to the glorious past, when there were also non-crippled and marginally employable violent drunks.

biotin7@sopuli.xyz on 04 Oct 18:59 collapse

Really dude ?? Really ?? Ukraine is running out of men.

[deleted] on 04 Oct 20:17 collapse
.
[deleted] on 04 Oct 20:40 next collapse
.
biotin7@sopuli.xyz on 05 Oct 14:33 collapse

I am not Russian, but cool joke bro. youtu.be/p1KwWZJFmCU

Also Don’t joke about the war, you death-worshipping degenerate. One question; which country are you from ?

Sideshow_B00b@lemmy.zip on 05 Oct 17:32 collapse

Son’t know where the guy you were denigrating was from, but I’m from Finland and we know Russia well enough to know what animals they are. Alao fuck you for spreading Russian propaganda

biotin7@sopuli.xyz on 05 Oct 18:28 collapse

Oh so basically, you don’t have any skin in the game; But love forcing other men to die For YOUR COMFORT & that Dehumanization is straight out of the zionist playbook. Good job war-monger.

US-imperialism is the cause of this war, there’s enough evidence for it, just like Israel.

Sideshow_B00b@lemmy.zip on 05 Oct 18:50 collapse

No skin in the game except over 1000km of border and hundreds of years of history with the most malignant war mongering country in the northern hemisphere who are contantly waging war with us, so you can just fuck off with your condescending attitude.

someguy3@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 14:17 next collapse

From China and Belarus apparently.

brucethemoose@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 14:21 next collapse

Headline seems true. To quote ISW’s Oct 1 report:

Gasoline shortages continue in Russia and occupied Ukraine due to repeated Ukrainian strikes on Russian oil refineries. Russian energy-focused outlet Seala told Russian state outlet RBK on September 30 that Russian oil refineries are temporarily facing a 38 percent decrease (roughly 338,000 tons per day) in their primary oil refining capacity as of September 28 due to Ukrainian drone strikes, which have struck more than two dozen major oil refineries in Russia since early August 2025.[20] Seala estimated that Russia’s total available capacity for gasoline and diesel fuel production fell by 6 percent in August 2025 and by another 18 percent in September 2025, reaching historic lows. Seala estimated that Ukrainian drone strikes caused approximately 70 percent of downtime in gasoline production as the strikes disabled approximately a quarter of Russia’s oil refining capacity (roughly 236,000 tons per day) by the end of September 2025, and that four more Russian refineries, including two of the top five largest Russian oil refineries, halted production after drone strikes. Independent Russian outlet the Moscow Times reported that the fuel crisis has impacted the Far East and occupied Crimea the hardest, where Russian authorities have banned sales of more than 30 liters of gasoline per customer since the beginning of the week (roughly September 28).[21] Crimean occupation head Sergey Aksyonov announced on October 1 a limit of 20 liters of gasoline per customer in an effort to mitigate the gasoline shortage.[22] Russian economist Vladislav Inozemtsev noted that Russian oil companies have to wait months for repairs to damaged refineries, as Western sanctions have blocked the sale of equipment and replacement parts on which Russia relies and cannot easily replace with Chinese equivalents. Russian business outlet Kommersant reported that Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak outlined to Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin on September 24 several possible means of alleviating Russia’s desperation for gas, including a zero-rate five percent import customs duty on gasoline imported from the People’s Republic of China (PRC), South Korea, and Singapore through certain checkpoints in the Far East.[23] Novak also reportedly proposed a rule that Russia will only authorize certain companies to supply fuel, which would allow Russia to export approximately 150,000 tons of gasoline from Siberian refineries westward per month to maintain supply balances in central Russia. Novak also reportedly proposed increasing gasoline imports from Belarus from 45,000 tons to 300,000 tons per month. RBK reported that Belarus began exporting gasoline to Russia in September 2025 after a pause that began in Fall 2024.[24]

Russia’s problems with oil refinery capabilities will likely persist amidst more damage to Russian oil refineries. Russian authorities and sources reported on October 1 that there was a large fire at the Yaroslavl Oil Refinery, located 700 kilometers from the Ukrainian border.[25] Yaroslavl Oblast Governor Mikhail Evraev claimed on October 1 that the incident is unrelated to a drone attack, and neither Ukrainian nor Russian sources have attributed responsibility for the fire.[26] Rostov Oblast Governor Yuriy Slyusar claimed that a Ukrainian drone strike overnight caused a fire at an industrial facility in Verkhnedonsky Raion, Rostov Oblast, and NASA FIRMS data indicates that there was a fire at the Sukhodolnaya Oil Pumping Station in Rostov Oblast.[27]

BilSabab@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 19:03 next collapse

Nothing to see here. It’s fake news. russia strong. Resistance is futile… ROFL

TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 19:54 next collapse

Ukraine is what the Allies have been in World War 2-- a really fucking competent leadership. It doesn’t matter if the opponent has a bigger stick if he’s too stupid to use it and keep missing the swings. That’s what Russia is. So much for “corrupt Ukraine”. No country is void of corruption, but if Ukraine is as corrupt as Russian propaganda insists they are, they wouldn’t have been able to survive this long and embarrass Russia. Speaking of which, it’s funny I don’t see much Russian bots try to smear Ukraine anymore (maybe Putin is instead focusing on propagandising the Russians). Since Kursk and the deep drone strike campaigns in Russia, it is clear that Russia is losing the propaganda war.

Maybe Ukraine couldn’t retake the areas occupied by Russia, but they could deliver a Pyrrhic blow to Kremlin. Russian international prestige already diminished as soon as they invaded.

PKscope@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 20:24 next collapse

I’m just concerned about what happens if things start to go really badly for the Russians. Nothing good can come of a nuclear superpower that feels threatened and backed into a corner, either by the enemy or their own populace.

phutatorius@lemmy.zip on 04 Oct 21:20 next collapse

They were ground to a standstill in Afghanistan too, and the apocalypse failed to materialize.

Some geriatic leaders were shown to be incompetent, so they were replaced by other elderly drunks.

plyth@feddit.org on 05 Oct 05:23 collapse

The USA does business with Vietnam but not Cuba. Strategically the countries are not the same.

fort_burp@feddit.nl on 05 Oct 15:54 collapse

This is an interesting point, but what are you saying? Sorry, I’m a bit dense.

plyth@feddit.org on 05 Oct 16:14 collapse

Afghanistan was strategically as important to the USSR as Vietnam was to the USA. So going nuclear was not worth it.

For no missiles on Cuba, the US risked everything, and they still embargo Cuba for leaving their fold.

Ukraine is even more important for Russia. So assuming that nothing will happen because nothing happened for the loss in Afghanistan is careless.

fort_burp@feddit.nl on 05 Oct 16:56 collapse

I see, thanks for spelling it out for me!

Saledovil@sh.itjust.works on 04 Oct 21:31 collapse

Eh, the people around Putin know that they have better odds of maintaining their lives and fortune when no nukes fly.

towerful@programming.dev on 04 Oct 20:26 next collapse

Maybe Ukraine couldn’t retake the areas occupied by Russia, but they could deliver a Pyrrhic blow to Kremlin.

They have delivered a pyrrhic victory.
Russia thought they could take Kyiv (Ukraine?) on 3 days.
The fact that Ukraine has resisted so hard, have redefined the modern battlefield, have conducted huge deep strikes…
Ukraine is winning.

The reason Ukraine may not be “winning” is because the Russian war machine is huge. Like really really big.
The reason that Ukraine is “winning” is because the Russian war machine is outdated and corrupt.

The western opinion of Russia has been devastated. Russia tested themselves, and failed.
Russia is holding on by their nukes.

beejboytyson@lemmy.world on 05 Oct 01:31 collapse

Didn’t they lose 30 percent of thier land?

ceiphas@feddit.org on 05 Oct 06:50 next collapse

20%, but most of it was already occupied since 2014 and the ongoing skirmishes in the east

FuckFascism@lemmy.world on 05 Oct 06:54 collapse

They might if they keep flying drones into NATO airspace.

RenLinwood@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 04 Oct 20:40 next collapse

competence does not in any way indicate an absence of corruption

phutatorius@lemmy.zip on 04 Oct 21:19 collapse

One of the symptoms of corruption is diversion of critical resources to private pockets.

Yeah, OK, all systems have some level of corruption, but setting binary thinking aside, in Ukraine, it can’t be of great magnitude or they couldn’t fight.

RenLinwood@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 04 Oct 23:22 collapse

Cool story

explodicle@sh.itjust.works on 04 Oct 23:58 next collapse

[Argument]

[Counter argument]

“Uhhhh I don’t care”

RenLinwood@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 05 Oct 00:04 collapse

Your baseless speculation does not in any way constitute a counter-argument, it is pure wishful thinking to avoid confronting the very real possibility that the US is about to lose another proxy war

explodicle@sh.itjust.works on 05 Oct 00:07 collapse

Oh that wasn’t me, I just noticed you chickening out of addressing their valid counter-argument.

RenLinwood@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 05 Oct 00:10 collapse

Like I said, not a counter-argument, wishful thinking, cope

explodicle@sh.itjust.works on 05 Oct 00:11 collapse

I coped by summarizing for anyone else skimming the discussion

RenLinwood@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 05 Oct 00:16 collapse

Anything’s possible when you make shit up kiddo

biotin7@sopuli.xyz on 05 Oct 14:35 next collapse

I feel bad for the Ukrainian men, they’re getting dragged into a meatgrinder for US imperalism.

RenLinwood@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 05 Oct 15:15 collapse

It’s a fucking tragedy how many innocent lives are still ending for an empire on the way out

biotin7@sopuli.xyz on 05 Oct 15:29 collapse

A fucking tragedy indeed. Even worse are the sympathizers of the empire Outside of USA

RenLinwood@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 05 Oct 15:31 collapse

Credit where it’s due, the US has fucking incredible PR

SpookyLights@lemmy.ca on 05 Oct 20:27 collapse

I’ve noticed that most people who say kiddo to demean someone are usually fucking morons who think that they’re very intelligent.

fort_burp@feddit.nl on 05 Oct 15:55 collapse

www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-68120973

Not sure what they’re on about.

phutatorius@lemmy.zip on 04 Oct 21:14 next collapse

(maybe Putin is instead focusing on propagandising the Russians)

Or maybe Putin decided the bot farmers were needed at the front lines as drone fodder.

RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com on 04 Oct 22:14 next collapse

Ukraine was probably close to as corrupt as the Russians have never stopped bleating, but:

  1. They’ve overhauled a lot of their government, largely fixing the corruption mess.
  2. What does it say about Russia if they can’t beat an allegedly corrupt and rotting government?
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 05 Oct 14:50 collapse

Ukraine is what the Allies have been in World War 2-- a really fucking competent leadership.

This is inaccurate on two fronts.

TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world on 05 Oct 15:59 next collapse

Except this is accurate on all fronts. Compare that to the Axis, who barely coordinated. Hell, Mussolini didn’t even tell Hitler he was going to invade Greece. When that didn’t work out, Hitler had to bail him out. That pushed the German invasion of the Soviet Union by one or two months. Who knows, maybe those two months could have allowed Germany to arrive in Moscow earlier and avoid the freezing winter, and history as we know it may have turned differently. Don’t even get me started the wastefulness of the Holocaust (the brain drain and potential manpower wasted), which Mussolini himself stated long before that the Nazi’s racial obsession is wasteful. This is why I want to smash the myth of efficiency of Nazi war machine, because they never were.

Also read up on Truman committee, who monitored corruption and wastefulness during the war period. They saved about $15 billion.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 05 Oct 19:35 collapse

This is why I want to smash the myth of efficiency of Nazi war machine

Broadly speaking, the myth is of “efficient war machine”. These sprawling, ego-driven, blunders of resource mismanagement aren’t specific to any one faction or ideological tenor.

The idea that Ukraine is some kind of model of efficiency is just war propaganda. The Spring Offensive of 2023 was a trainwreck.

Similarly, the mythology of British/American logistical accumen is wildly overinflated. Normandy was only possible because the Eastern Front was sucking up so much of Germany’s material and manpower. The far bigger win for the Allies was simply the Radar + cracking Enigma, blunting Operation Sea Lion.

TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world on 05 Oct 20:06 collapse

The idea that Ukraine is some kind of model of efficiency is just war propaganda. The Spring Offensive of 2023 was a trainwreck.

Oh, and Russia is better? Is that why they are stuck in Ukraine for two years now with the frontlines barely budging at the cost of something like 900,000 Russian casualties? The 2022 Kharkiv counter offensive liberated 200 km2 in just three months? The Black Sea fleet essentially nonexistent? Russia can’t defend itself from deep drone incursions for a country supposedly more powerful? I don’t know what your agenda is, but the results speak for itself. Like I said, it doesn’t matter if the person wields a bigger stick if he can’t use it well and keeps missing. The Ukrainian spring offensive failed in 2023 but the Ukrainians learned; the Russians didn’t.

Similarly, the mythology of British/American logistical accumen is wildly overinflated.

They are better. The Allies have prepared for a war with Germany. The US alone have been able to mobilise its factories for war production and enlist 600,000 men (if I remember the figures correctly) in just six months after Pearl Harbor, unlike in WWI which took them a better part of one year to do so. The country already produced and sent hundreds of Liberty ships to supply UK and USSR. Germany, on the other hand, by admission of German generals after the war, stated they only had enough men and supplies to last them less than a year at the start of the war, if they don’t defeat the West quickly. Because Hitler did not expect the Allies to declare war on him after invading Poland. Germany was actually on the brink of bankruptcy just before they invaded Poland.

On the Asia Pacific front, Japan also didn’t inform Germany of the plan to bomb Pearl Harbor. Couple of days later, Germany declared war on US unnecessarily. So yes, tell me how efficient this is.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 05 Oct 20:24 collapse

Oh, and Russia is better?

No. They’re also awful, as evidenced Prigovahn’s Leroy Jenkins attack on Moscow.

But the bar for greatness isn’t the clumsiness of your opposition. This war is Pyrrich for both countries. The only winners are the arms dealers.

I don’t know what your agenda is,

I am literally Vladimir Putin himself, trying to get you to think badly of the Ukrainian military, because I know your personal opinion is the lynchpin to who wins the war.

They are better. The Allies have prepared for a war with Germany.

They famously were not prepared which lead to France collapsing as Germany outflanked the Maginot Line for the second time in two World Wars.

Belgium wasn’t prepared either. It was flattened in months.

Poland wasn’t prepared. Ukraine wasn’t prepared. Russia was barely prepared. North Africa was run straight through.

The US alone have been able to mobilise its factories for war production and enlist 600,000 men (if I remember the figures correctly) in just six months after Pearl Harbor

The US was backstopping the UK, Russia, and China for three full years (closer to ten, if you count the Japanese invasion of the Chinese mainland).

They didn’t need six months to mobilize. They just needed an excuse to ramp up military spending in a recession.

Germany, on the other hand, by admission of German generals after the war, stated they only had enough men and supplies to last them less than a year at the start of the war

The joke of this was that the US was helping them out, too! At least at the outset. American industry was instrumental in gassing up German tanks and tabulating head count for concentration camps.

Even at the late stage of the war, American spies and diplomats were eager to make peace with Berlin and pivot the Nazis back Eastward. The only thing that saved Hitler from the DC anti-Communist rubber chicken speaking circuit was Russian tanks beating Americans to the capital.

On the Asia Pacific front, Japan also didn’t inform Germany of the plan to bomb Pearl Harbor. Couple of days later, Germany declared war on US unnecessarily

The US was half in bed with the Germans, but fully in bed with the British. The only way they were going to escape War with the US was somehow getting Edward VIII to bump off Churchill.

TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world on 05 Oct 21:04 collapse

They famously were not prepared which lead to France collapsing as Germany outflanked the Maginot Line for the second time in two World Wars.

The Maginot Line did work as intended. The Germans did go around as intended after all. The Allies just didn’t expect the German’ main blow through the Ardennes.

Ukraine wasn’t prepared. Russia was barely prepared.

Ukraine knew what was coming after the intelligence reports started coming of possible Russian attack. They’ve been at proxy war with Russia after all for eight years before the full scale invasion.

The Russians weren’t even prepared at all. You’re conveniently forgetting that Russian troops were told they were going on a military exercise but surprised to find they are in Ukraine. They were also given outdated maps. They quickly rushed through Ukraine without their supply lines being protected. Meanwhile, Ukraine know how to protect their supply lines.

They didn’t need six months to mobilize.

Roosevelt and Churchill knew they will come to blows with the Axis sooner or later. Roosevelt made a speech about the US being arsenal of democracy long before US entered the war.

This war is Pyrrich for both countries. The only winners are the arms dealers.

They just needed an excuse to ramp up military spending in a recession.

Gradually showing the true colours, are we? Invoking the usual “only the arms manufacturers benefit” to try to smear a justified self-defense that Kremlin push.

Even at the late stage of the war, American spies and diplomats were eager to make peace with Berlin and pivot the Nazis back Eastward. The only thing that saved Hitler from the DC anti-Communist rubber chicken speaking circuit was Russian tanks beating Americans to the capital.

Do you have a source? Or is this voodoo historical distortionism? The Nazis tried to make overtures to the West many times in their self-delusion that the Allies will be convinced to fight the Soviets (which was the Nazi belief from the start of the war), but the Allies refused many times. You are forgetting the Allied and Soviet meetings throughout the war discussing war plans and their vision of post-war world. The Allies can’t reneg on the deal and so are the Soviets. So, it doesn’t make sense for the Allies to capture Berlin, since Berlin was agreed upon to be under Soviet influence after the war, and it’s a waste of time and needless deaths for the Allies.

The US was half in bed with the Germans

US ships were already in skirmish with German u-boats for well over a year before Pearl Harbor.

Oh the right, useful idiots for Kremlin.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 06 Oct 00:26 collapse

The Germans did go around as intended

Jesus Christ.

TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world on 06 Oct 01:13 collapse

How do you know basic facts? Lol that was the intention of Maginot line!

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/9581d240-46c3-43e9-9dd7-927622f839a6.jpeg">

Psythik@lemmy.world on 05 Oct 21:16 collapse

Well? Where’s your counter-argunent? I’m listening…

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 05 Oct 21:53 collapse

en.wikipedia.org/…/2023_Ukrainian_counteroffensiv…

Psythik@lemmy.world on 05 Oct 21:55 collapse

I asked for a counter-argument, not a lazy link that only serves to support the other person’s argument! Come on, man, you can do better than that! Show me what you got!

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 05 Oct 21:58 collapse

I asked for a counter-argument, not a lazy link

You get what you pay for. The 2023 counteroffensive was a total flop. It was so bad that Prigozhin’s whole mercenary company walked away from the front lines and marched on Moscow without costing Russia an iota of stolen territory.

You could learn how and why it failed, if you bothered to read the finer details. But you’ve chosen to be a cheerleader for a disastrous management of the world’s fifth largest military instead. Might as well announce you’re a die-hard fan of William McClellan as defend the Ukrainian top brass.

Psythik@lemmy.world on 05 Oct 22:56 next collapse

Thank you. I disagree, but I will consider your argument and dig deeper when I get the chance to.

TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world on 06 Oct 02:54 collapse

Why are you defining Ukraine’s performance over on one battle? That’s like saying the Allies lost World War 2 because they lost the Battle of France, Singapore and Manila. You are conveniently forgetting the 2022 Kharkiv counteroffensive, the destruction of Russian Black Sea fleet and the ongoing drone campaigns. Those are good planning. The main reason the Ukrainian 2023 offensive flopped was because of intelligence leak and the Russians knew of the plan and had time to dig in. The best comparison to this is the WWII Battle of Kursk and when Rommel attacked first before the British does, because they knew what’s coming thanks of intelligence leaks.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 06 Oct 11:58 collapse

Why are you defining Ukraine’s performance over on one battle?

It’s a clear illustration of their overall military performance.

That’s like saying the Allies lost World War 2 because they lost the Battle of France, Singapore and Manila.

These are all strong indictments of Allies military strategy and a big reason why the war dragged on until 1945, killed tens of millions of additional people.

The main reason the Ukrainian 2023 offensive flopped was because of intelligence leak

You simply do not know what you’re talking about. The Ukrainians underestimated Russian fortifications and artillery power, then deployed what was a relatively large and agile pool of armored vehicles into a series of choke points that were easy to bombard.

TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world on 06 Oct 20:28 collapse

Lol, did you learn military strategy and tactics from videogames? Do you think you could end any wars quickly? Look here folks! We got someone better than the Ukrainian and all Allied generals combined. It is though as if you are playing against an AI and could finish a fight in one hour! Tell NATO and Putin about this random internet stranger!

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 06 Oct 20:39 collapse

We got someone better than the Ukrainian and all Allied generals combined.

Good luck on the front lines.

drhodl@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 20:05 next collapse

It will be fun when Ukraine starts locating and burning the imports, too :) Fuck Pootin, and fuck ruzzia. They are curse to humanity !

phutatorius@lemmy.zip on 04 Oct 21:21 collapse

Destruction of pipelines and refineries will mean that it doesn’t matter where the fuel’s coming from. They’ll either have to import refined products or do without.

drhodl@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 21:28 collapse

Indeed. But I’m also suggesting that the import facilities are targets now, too. If they can’t produce, and can’t import, they will just have to live like the cavemen that ruzzians are.

TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca on 04 Oct 21:41 next collapse

Ukraine Uno Reversed Russia, petrostate is now petroneedstate.

CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org on 04 Oct 22:35 collapse

Only finished product, right? Russia without the ability to net export crude is basically just land.

fort_burp@feddit.nl on 05 Oct 15:58 collapse

Not even very good land:

Russia has been facing severe environmental issues, with the country’s Natural Resources Ministry naming 35 cities and towns with dangerously high air pollution levels. The country’s air pollution is largely attributed to industrial activity and vehicular traffic, with over 200 cities exceeding pollution limits. The Krasnoyarsk region has the highest air pollution level, with the city of Norilsk being the worst offender, releasing 1,787,000 tons of pollutants into the air. Other major cities like Moscow, St. Petersburg, Yekaterinburg, and Volgograd also experience high concentrations of air pollution. Water pollution is also a serious concern, with 75% of surface water and 50% of all water in Russia contaminated. The country’s soil degradation, nuclear waste storage, and deforestation further contribute to its environmental challenges.

CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org on 05 Oct 18:27 collapse

Ah, the old Soviet approach to environmentalism: that’s a bunch of capitalist hogwash Ivan, just dump out the arsenic anywhere.