China says it cannot accept countries acting as 'world judge' after US captures Maduro (www.reuters.com)
from MicroWave@lemmy.world to world@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 03:45
https://lemmy.world/post/41168012

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said Beijing cannot accept any country acting as the “world’s judge” after the United States captured Venezuela’s President Nicolas Maduro.

The world’s second-largest economy has provided Venezuela with an economic lifeline since the U.S. and its allies ramped up sanctions in 2017, purchasing roughly $1.6 billion worth of goods in 2024, the most recent full-year data available.

Almost half of China’s purchases were crude oil, customs data shows, while its state-owned oil giants had invested around $4.6 billion in Venezuela by 2018, according to data from the American Enterprise Institute think tank, which tracks Chinese overseas corporate investment.

#world

threaded - newest

TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works on 05 Jan 03:52 next collapse

And china are right in this case. They’re just also assholes

FiniteBanjo@feddit.online on 05 Jan 04:18 next collapse

I think they’re wrong. Their statement is basically that international law is meaningless and that they’re free to wage war without consequences.

This was probably their endgame from the beginning, since they promoted and helped reelect Donald Trump. If it came out that Trump, Maduro, Putin, and Xi Jinping all conspired to make these events happen, I would not at all be surprised.

TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works on 05 Jan 04:32 next collapse

Well, international law is meaningless. As trump has just shown us.

FiniteBanjo@feddit.online on 05 Jan 04:37 next collapse

Were you expecting the consequences to be instantaneous? Like, what, simultaneous nuclear strikes in retalliation?

Even if proceedings started immediately there wouldn’t be changes to trade for weeks at a minimum and no sentencing for months or even years, but honestly proceedings aren’t likely to start until the individuals responsible lose political power.

reddit_sux@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 04:42 collapse

Sanctions against US like the ones against Russia.

FiniteBanjo@feddit.online on 05 Jan 04:45 collapse

And China. Yes.

reddit_sux@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 04:51 next collapse

In spite of many of its economic and military misadventures, China hasn’t invaded anyone as of yet.

That distinction is still important or else v shud sanction every country.

Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip on 05 Jan 04:59 next collapse

well not invaded anyone of recent. the last official one would be the short one in vietnam after vietnam ended the Khmer Rouge. this of course was nearly half a century ago though, so a lot of poeple online wouldn’t recall it because it wouldn’t be part of their generation.

FiniteBanjo@feddit.online on 05 Jan 05:04 collapse

China is occupying Tibet and Hong Kong and claiming it owns Taiwan as well. It also frequently sends warships through seas owned by the Philippines where it has been illegally fishing and destroying Philippines fishing vessels. A couple of weeks ago Chinese authorities refused an Indian passport because they claimed that part of India belonged to China.

Also, China waged war on it’s own people in Tienanmen Square.

hitmyspot@aussie.zone on 05 Jan 05:22 collapse

Hong Kong was returned to china by the UK as agreed when it was leased. None (few?) of the people living there at the time of handowver were alive when the agreement was made but they were living in Hong Kong on borrowed tine regardless, legally speaking. It’s a very different situation to an illegal invasion.

China not getting Hong Kong back as a territory would have been more damaging to international law and order and international treaties and agreements. International treaties and agreements are supposed to outlive those who agreed them. It’s between nations, not people.

FaceDeer@fedia.io on 05 Jan 05:40 next collapse

Yeah, much as I dislike how it turned out and how China has been ignoring what post-unification rules there were on Hong Kong, the return itself was above board. Had I been living in Hong Kong in the years leading up I'd have taken the opportunity to get out if at all possible.

FiniteBanjo@feddit.online on 05 Jan 09:46 collapse

Idk about above board, the nation it was supposed to be returned to doesn’t exist anymore.

DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works on 05 Jan 12:53 next collapse

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Successor_state

Example:

USSR --> Succeeded by Russian Federation and they inherited the UN seat and the Non Proliferation Treaty

ROC --> UN members voted to recognize PRC as the representative of “China”

Returning Hong Kong to China wasn’t the issue, the issue is that PRC does not have democracy. If they had democracy, I doubt anyone would care that Hong Kong became part of China.

I don’t think Hong Kongers want to secede, per se, they just want freedom.

FiniteBanjo@feddit.online on 05 Jan 18:37 collapse

If they had democracy, I doubt anyone would care that Hong Kong became part of China.

I certainly wouldn’t. If anything I’d probably celebrate it.

FaceDeer@fedia.io on 05 Jan 18:25 collapse

It's a not uncommon pattern to have "successor states" that inherit the treaties and obligations of the previous ones. For example how Russia "inherited" the Soviet Union's position on the UN Security Council, or how Canada is bound by treaties with the First Nations that were signed by Britain (who we were a colony of at the time).

Would have been a Big Funny if Britain had handed Hong Kong off to Taiwan instead, though.

FiniteBanjo@feddit.online on 05 Jan 18:41 collapse

Yeah that would have been awesome.

FiniteBanjo@feddit.online on 05 Jan 09:45 collapse

According to the BBC:

What was agreed for the future of Hong Kong?

China agreed to govern Hong Kong under the principle of “one country, two systems”, where the city would enjoy “a high degree of autonomy, except in foreign and defence affairs” for the next 50 years.

Hong Kong became a Special Administrative Region, and would retain certain freedoms, including:

  • an independent judiciary
  • multiple political parties
  • freedom of assembly and speech

The territory has its own mini-constitution - the Basic Law - that enshrines these rights.

It states that “the ultimate aim” is to elect the territory’s leader, the chief executive, “by universal suffrage” and “in accordance with democratic procedures”.

What actually happened is the Chinese Government immediately went in with their military, restructured the legislative body, and cracked down hard on any dissent.

<img alt="YhSnGH0y2htDaGv.jpg" src="https://piefed-media.feddit.online/posts/Yh/Sn/YhSnGH0y2htDaGv.jpg">

<img alt="ndlYaC0peLOPHu0.jpg" src="https://piefed-media.feddit.online/posts/nd/lY/ndlYaC0peLOPHu0.jpg">

<img alt="mE3tMRa2BU251z8.jpg" src="https://piefed-media.feddit.online/posts/mE/3t/mE3tMRa2BU251z8.jpg">

<img alt="sUX5yEbGHwmRjKm.jpg" src="https://piefed-media.feddit.online/posts/sU/X5/sUX5yEbGHwmRjKm.jpg">

<img alt="KU2aGlbFVfuieOE.jpg" src="https://piefed-media.feddit.online/posts/KU/2a/KU2aGlbFVfuieOE.jpg">

<img alt="4jNLHhTWSb6JkC9.jpg" src="https://piefed-media.feddit.online/posts/4j/NL/4jNLHhTWSb6JkC9.jpg">

mrdown@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 05:17 collapse

China is already sanctionned. There is no sanctions on the United Snakes

FiniteBanjo@feddit.online on 05 Jan 05:19 collapse

Welcome to the discussion. Glad you’re all caught up. Be sure to check for updates after more than 2 days have passed, likely 2 to 3 weeks.

Gsus4@mander.xyz on 05 Jan 04:48 next collapse

Iraq was long before tramp

FaceDeer@fedia.io on 05 Jan 05:38 collapse

At least with Iraq the US pretended to be following international norms. The presented lies to the UN to justify their actions, they gathered allies into a "coalition."

msage@programming.dev on 05 Jan 10:56 collapse

I can’t believe how you make their point better for them.

It was always a farce.

Fuck the US.

Serinus@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 08:31 collapse

And Putin with Ukraine. And Xi with Hong Kong.

Gsus4@mander.xyz on 05 Jan 04:49 next collapse

putin was quite happy to declare this multipolar law-free world. I hope he at least enjoys it, because I won’t.

BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip on 05 Jan 09:35 next collapse

You’re getting downvotes but it might be because some people are surprised that Xi Jingping would support Trump but I’ve gathered some evidence it might be true.

For starters we look at TikTok. Regarding TikTok this article is the most damning: theinformation.com/…/how-tiktok-courted-conservat… (archive/non-paywall: archive.is/TUjo9)

The top leaders pushed through content moderation changes that made TikTok more accepting of some conservative views on the fairness of elections or transgender rights, including by updating policies on banned content or enforcing them differently.

I hate the way they worded that. What they really mean is allowing the big lie (false claims the 2020 election was rigged) and transphobia.

See: theverge.com/…/trump-tiktok-ban-maga-influencers (archive link: archive.is/DMOLf)

MAGA influencers also view TikTok as a relatively reliable platform to publish pro-Trump content without fear that their accounts will get demonetized, restricted, or worse, deactivated.

Also see: foxnews.com/…/maga-republicans-defend-tiktok-cons… (archive link: archive.is/RGBC8)

“Trump won the election because he listened to first-time voters like myself and joined TikTok to get his message to us directly,” RNC Youth Advisory Council Chair Brilyn Hollyhand told Fox News Digital of the impending ban.

Also see: apnews.com/…/ap-top-news-courts-john-bolton-polit…

President Donald Trump “pleaded” with China’s Xi Jinping during a 2019 summit to help his reelection prospects, according to a scathing new book by former Trump adviser John Bolton that accuses the president of being driven by political calculations when making national security decisions.

Then we cannot forget about all the Chinese bots who post online. “China is pushing divisive political messages online using fake U.S. voters” npr.org/…/china-tiktok-x-fake-voters-influence-ca… Says it very clearly. They used the same strategy Russia did.

FiniteBanjo@feddit.online on 05 Jan 09:47 next collapse

Also, TikTok voluntarily went offline right before the ban’s due date, but then went right back online thanking Donald Trump 14 hours later without Trump having to do anything. I’ve also seen how they treat Donald Trump on the other psyops like Hexbear, he was the favored candidate by far for Tankies.

BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip on 05 Jan 10:11 collapse

I think I know what you’re talking about! The people who pretend to be “far-left”, socialist or communist but for some bizarre reason they keep supporting Russia.

I had an experience with one of those people recently. I asked one of those people point blank do you support Trump and they completely dogged the question. Clicking on profiles of these types of people I notice they also never denounce Trump or Republicans or do so very rarely.

I actually deeply regretfully used to be somewhat of a Trump supporter so now I’m very sensitive to people who may be secretly Trump supporters or those who have similar characteristics. Those “tankie” type people really peg my MAGA-meter. It’s almost like when someone has an abusive ex they tend to notice certain things more afterwards (I wish I could word this sentence better but hopefully people can understand).

Ultimately what makes tankies and MAGA similar even if they are not secretly supporting Trump or a bot is belief persistence when there is contrary and reputable evidence and belief in conspiracy theories. Part of what helped me escape MAGA is media literacy and realizing that if someone presents reputable information that contradicts what I believe, I should change my beliefs not plug my ears and regurgitate conspiracy theories based on some random comment like a screenshot of a screenshot of a 4chan post or just saying nonsense like “I don’t trust the MSM”.

phutatorius@lemmy.zip on 05 Jan 12:56 collapse

China shares an interest with Russia in weakening the US and Europe.

CircaV@lemmy.ca on 05 Jan 15:22 next collapse

Why? Maduro is such small beans compared to them? It’s low hanging fruit.

FiniteBanjo@feddit.online on 05 Jan 17:53 collapse

The point is, as China is illustrating, that if every world power does what they want then international laws don’t apply to any of them, as a way to justify their current occupations and use of force as well as future invasions.

They’re saying “the world won’t protect you, ao why protect the world?”

rumba@lemmy.zip on 05 Jan 16:06 collapse

If it came out that Trump, Maduro, Putin, and Xi Jinping all conspired

I think it’s more likely that Trump asked what he could get away with regarding seizing a bunch of money from another country, and Venezuela was a low-risk, high-reward.

FaceDeer@fedia.io on 05 Jan 04:15 next collapse

Heartbreaking: The Worst Person You Know Just Made a Great Point.

cecilkorik@lemmy.ca on 05 Jan 05:45 next collapse

that’s perfect. chef’s kiss.

BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 06:56 collapse

Marjorie Taylor Green posted about how invading Venezuela is a terrible idea.

I hate it when I agree with Marjorie Taylor Green.

saltesc@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 08:35 collapse

It’s as good to agree as it is to disagree. It’s not good to disagree for the sake of it, so you’re doing good 😊

Eyekaytee@aussie.zone on 05 Jan 05:06 next collapse

China is hypocritical as FUCK

They take Tibet, they take Hong Kong despite practically the entire island coming out to say no thanks, they threaten Taiwan every second day, and the only reason they haven’t taken Taiwan is because they wouldn’t have been able to hold it against the west

Now they see how weak Europe is and the nutter in command of the US, and their plans have accelerated, this is simply an opportunity to further push propaganda on something they were always going to do

On top of that I actually wouldn’t mind if we had a judge that aligns closer to American/Western values

China is literally right next to the totalitarian dystopian hellscape that is North Korea

Executions for watching south korean tv, 3 generations of jail as punishment for committing crimes

i would have no problems if even china which is not great even by itself could bring some sense to north korea

[deleted] on 05 Jan 05:15 next collapse
.
Eyekaytee@aussie.zone on 05 Jan 05:44 next collapse

??? who are you?

Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk on 05 Jan 06:24 next collapse

You know we’re talking about China right?

mrdown@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 13:33 collapse

I have the right to expand about the topic of hypocrisy. What is the problem with calling out a genocide supporter hypocrite?

AzuranAurora@piefed.ca on 05 Jan 08:12 next collapse

Common mrdown L. Learn how to spell, buddy.

mrdown@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 13:32 collapse

Ok language police. All i said is right . That guy is a big hypocrite and a genovide supporter. What’s your problem with what I said?

AzuranAurora@piefed.ca on 05 Jan 18:06 collapse

Even if so (I don’t know this user or their beliefs), what does that have to do with the current discussion? All I can see is you going full aggro against them completely unprompted. You addressed nothing about what they said, just immediately leaped to insults and accusations.
The fact you didn’t bother checking your spelling just makes you look like you saw this user and just went off on them without a second thought out of anger. This is something I have seen you do time and time again.

Serinus@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 08:29 collapse

Did you reply to the wrong comment?

prex@aussie.zone on 05 Jan 12:24 next collapse

Yes, they are hypocritical but they are also right - a unilateral invasion like that is baaad:

<img alt="" src="https://aussie.zone/pictrs/image/3323cede-0a44-4754-9374-e1c66ceabad3.gif">.

Edit: image is directed at China, not ikt.

DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works on 05 Jan 12:45 next collapse

They’re also trying to erase the Cantonese Language from existence… 🫤

SippyCup@lemmy.ml on 05 Jan 13:26 next collapse

the only reason they haven’t taken Taiwan is because they wouldn’t have been able to hold it against the west

Eeeeh I’m not so sure about that anymore.

I suspect losing trading partners is the biggest deterrent. As soon as controlling the supply of Taiwanese microchips becomes more financially viable than making billions of tons of cheap goods every year, China will take Taiwan. And the US naval fleet will either be cruise missiled to the bottom of the ocean or we’ll just quietly walk back our threats to defend it.

Bortcorns4Jeezus@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 13:36 next collapse

Yikes chill a little… You actually believe that nonsense about North Korea?

T00l_shed@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 15:58 collapse

The nonsense about the dictatorship in North Korea?

americanSuxxx@sh.itjust.works on 06 Jan 10:06 collapse

Sorry but kpop simps deserve it

BoJackHorseman@piefed.social on 05 Jan 16:58 collapse

Not as much as America tho.

People often forget all the countries America has bombed and destabilized in the past.

<img alt="" src="https://media.piefed.social/posts/8T/kW/8TkW9HZIAqfo5B7.jpg">

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 04:07 next collapse

according to data from the American Enterprise Institute

Don’t ask who pays their bills

NOT_RICK@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 04:22 next collapse

While I agree you always need to look at who is saying what and what their motivations are, China has been investing in Venezuela, just as they have in many other countries.

IndustryStandard@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 09:27 next collapse

Investing in Venezuela instead of sanctioning them until they bow to your will? Terrible.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 15:30 collapse

The largest outside investment in Venezuela has come from California based multinationals. China’s a very recent entrant into the Venezuelan market, owing in large part to the rising tide of US sanctions that prevents western businesses from doing the kind of trade they were already enthusiastic about.

Incidentally, the American Enterprise Institute operates as a lobbyist on behalf of many of those California businesses.

stickly@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 06:23 collapse

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_fallacy

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 15:24 collapse

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Boy_Who_Cried_Wolf

stickly@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 17:55 collapse

Nobody is crying wolf here, this is just a statement of imports and exports based on publicly available data giving context to China’s interests in the region. Is admitting that China works for their own geopolitical interests too much for you? We’re now down to dismissing public customs and OPEC data because engaging in foreign economic interests is a little too close to American imperialism for comfort?

tehsillz@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 04:12 next collapse

If only they said the same about Ukraine and Taiwan

FiniteBanjo@feddit.online on 05 Jan 04:19 next collapse

They did. The statement is “it cannot accept countries acting as ‘world judge’” meaning countries also cannot judge them, that’s exactly what China is claiming.

BoJackHorseman@piefed.social on 05 Jan 17:03 collapse

Americans don’t even know all the countries America has annexed in the past. Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, Cuba. But you guys are obsessed with Taiwan. Free these countries first then have an opinion about Taiwan.

Aljernon@lemmy.today on 06 Jan 01:26 next collapse

Whataboutism. I can criticize the actions of past and present Americans AND criticize the actions of China. Bad things the US has done doesn’t give a free pass to China to do bad things.

BoJackHorseman@piefed.social on 06 Jan 18:53 collapse

It kind of does. It’s called shifting the overton window.

2000 years ago, Isaac married Rebekah when she was only 3 years old. King David married Abishag when she was 12. Pedophilia was common back then so everyone was doing it.

edible_funk@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 14:03 collapse

You are just full on CCP ain’t ya. Share your thoughts on Tiananmen Square.

BoJackHorseman@piefed.social on 06 Jan 18:42 collapse

Care to share your thoughts?

<img alt="" src="https://media.piefed.social/posts/7J/2O/7J2OL5346vrqx4Q.jpg">

Rhoeri@piefed.world on 05 Jan 04:12 next collapse

Taiwan has entered the chat.

velindora@lemmy.cafe on 05 Jan 04:17 next collapse

Wait, didn’t they just say it was a good template for Taiwan?

Eyekaytee@aussie.zone on 05 Jan 05:07 next collapse

they are pumping out propaganda hard right now, it’s everywhere

hitmyspot@aussie.zone on 05 Jan 05:25 next collapse

That’s not from official statements, I believe, but what posters are saying on social media. China heavily controls social media, so it’s not a stretch to say that if the posts are not being removed en masse, then they tacitly approve.

They may just allow it to promote nationalism, even if they don’t have any intention of acting. Taiwan is certainly inching towards increasing danger since Ukraine, Gaza and now Venezuela has had minimal blowback. Russia has had sanctions but much less than required to hurt significantly.

Eyekaytee@aussie.zone on 05 Jan 05:47 collapse

if we lose ukraine and taiwan that’s two more countries going back towards tbh straight under dictatorship rule, 2 losses for the west and democracy

i don’t understand why europe is being so quiet on taiwan, i can only assume they want to keep the good times coming with cheap chinese goods

k0e3@lemmy.ca on 05 Jan 08:36 next collapse

Yeah after losing the US to dictatorial rule, I dunno if the West can take any more losses.

Aljernon@lemmy.today on 06 Jan 01:30 next collapse

i don’t understand why europe is being so quiet on taiwan

Europe is far from Taiwan, has little in the way of Naval Assets or Territorial Possessions nearby to even be relevant in a war, and frankly has their hands full closer to home.

americanSuxxx@sh.itjust.works on 06 Jan 10:05 collapse

European here.

I don’t give a shit about taiwan because they’re chinese

americanSuxxx@sh.itjust.works on 06 Jan 10:06 collapse

You’re pumping out propaganda, idiot

cyd@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 09:32 collapse

That’s Chinese social media.

Gsus4@mander.xyz on 05 Jan 04:47 next collapse

This is not about law, if it were, elon, tramp and others would also be in jail. But China does its share of abducting and juding too, no? At least for its own dissidents abroad.

5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 05 Jan 05:54 next collapse

that’s a new rhetoric from them

MutantTailThing@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 06:09 next collapse

‘Despicable cunts accuse despicable cunts of being despicable cunts’

drmoose@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 06:22 next collapse

Lmao literally while supporting Russia for doing the exact same thing but like a billion times worse.

green_red_black@slrpnk.net on 05 Jan 06:29 next collapse

Classic “He is out of line but he is right.” Moment.

FiniteBanjo@feddit.online on 06 Jan 02:56 collapse

Not really. Nations can and should be judged by the international community, I expect punishments on the way for Trump’s actions if the US Congress fails to do anything about this offence.

green_red_black@slrpnk.net on 06 Jan 03:16 collapse

Oh if only that where true

FiniteBanjo@feddit.online on 06 Jan 03:21 collapse

It was true for China, it was true for Russia, it was true for South Africa, hell it was even true for Venezuela.

green_red_black@slrpnk.net on 06 Jan 03:59 collapse

I don’t know which crime of China you are referring to. But regardless China has overwhelming got away with them.

For Russia the closest is invading Ukraine but since Russia is still invading (and slowly gaining more territory.) I wouldn’t say Russia has been punished (though not from lack of trying.)

I don’t know what you could be referring to with South Africa, if it’s Apartide that wasn’t because of some coalition of nations but a global BDS protest movement.

And for Venezuela the primary “punishment.” Was US backed Sanctions to try and bring the nation back under its sphere. So hardly a Coalition of Nations bringing about justice

frongt@lemmy.zip on 05 Jan 06:47 next collapse

China says

Ok yeah straight to the circular file for this one

0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 05 Jan 09:08 next collapse

Sanction them then?

TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz on 05 Jan 14:32 collapse

“cannot accept” = asking them nicely to stop. It’s a nothing burger

BoJackHorseman@piefed.social on 05 Jan 16:56 next collapse

China will do something better, replace the dollar as the reserve currency. That will result in the fall of America crushed by its own debt, same reason Britain fell.

NikkiDimes@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 19:04 next collapse

The US dollar is used for 53% of the world’s reserve currency. China’s Renminbi is 2%. It’s a fun thought, but no. If anything, the Euro at 18.4% has a better shot.

BoJackHorseman@piefed.social on 06 Jan 18:57 collapse

Britain ruled more than half of the globe at its peak. No one thought it would ever fall. But here we are.

No one would have imagined Chinese cars dominating the world 10 years ago, but here we are.

Don’t look at where they are, but where they’re going.

NikkiDimes@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 20:03 collapse

I never said USD won’t ever fall. Holy shit, you guys can’t read. Your love for China absolutely blinds you.

BoJackHorseman@piefed.social on 07 Jan 03:38 collapse

Your gate for China absolutely blinds you. You have no idea how much CIA has propagandised you.

The internet was invented by the American military. You don’t think they would use it to influence you?

NikkiDimes@lemmy.world on 07 Jan 04:33 collapse

I am fully aware of how horrible the US government is. If you weren’t so blinded by your own misguided passion, you’d have seen that.

Prove_your_argument@piefed.social on 06 Jan 00:10 collapse

lol, if you’re not chinese, wealthy, and in the party you’re not in the club.

If you’re not ultra wealthy you’re also not in the club today, so i’m sure you won’t see much of a change between one regime and another, unless you’re an ‘undesirable’ that comes to find yourself in the sphere of influence of china anyway.

BoJackHorseman@piefed.social on 06 Jan 18:58 collapse

I don’t care about being rich, I just want the terrorist empire to fall

<img alt="" src="https://media.piefed.social/posts/Xv/KM/XvKMuQB0EQUQS3W.jpg">

Prove_your_argument@piefed.social on 06 Jan 20:01 collapse

Hey we can knock off all the big empires and let the cartels take over. Get beheadings, stonings and other crude execution methods back in the civilized world. Bring us all down to the same level.

We can have women accused of whatever bullshit and get the rape gangs going. I hear it’s all the rage in Pakistan.

Maybe we can get Maduro in there so that he can send his goons in to rape anyone who speaks out against his rule. They don’t care if you are a man, woman, adult or child- but this is a thing that happens to those who are against him. Have you asked any Venezuelans about that before?

I don’t think what the US does is right. I just envision the world you are pushing for. It’s horrific. Even more so than the billions suffering every day today.

Would be nice if enough normal, kind people banded together and started a world government with some teeth… but human nature is to take advantage for oneself. It’ll never happen. Once we’re extinct maybe the next intelligent life will succeed where we failed. It’s a kill or be killed world as long as humanity is in charge.

shalafi@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 18:57 collapse

Diplomats do not speak the same language as you and I sitting around sipping beer and bullshitting. In diplomatic terms that means, “We’re pissed off, though we’re not taking immediate action. Keep going, FAFO.”

yeather@lemmy.ca on 06 Jan 01:41 collapse

No, this amounts to “Please stop you’re dismantling our client state, we can’t actually stop you though.”

CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 10:00 next collapse

Okay, I’m sure this is the last straw, right? And you’ll stop funding Russia right?

lechekaflan@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 10:06 next collapse

In any case, Mainland China still wants to supplant the US as a world power, so any failings of the Americans will be advantageous to Chinese regardless of its own domestic issues, as it does business with mostly countries rejected by the Americans as “enemy states” and undeserving of its support.

edit: To that particular someone who says to the contrary believing Americans remain strong, the Mainlanders still have their presence known in my country, especially as far as trade is concerned; walk into any street market and Mainland goods are cheap and present in huge volumes, and to boycott their goods will be next to impossible, having completely captured my country’s market.

bunchberry@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 14:38 collapse

China obviously doesn’t give af about supplanting the US as a world power. If they did they would actually do stuff internationally. There is no Chinese equivalent to NATO. All they will do in regards to Venezuelan president being kidnapped is strongly condemn it. They won’t even offer PSUV any security guarantees. Literally all the Chinese government believes in is (1) trading with as many people as possible and (2) reuniting its breakaway territories. They have no ambitions beyond that. It is not true that China does business mostly with countries rejected by the Americans, but it does business with literally everyone. Chinese love to trade with everyone. While Americans media constantly criticizes China on every calling for regime change attacking their political system their leaders etc, the only time you ever hear criticism of the US on Chinese media is when the US does something that is viewed as harming trade, like the tariffs.

MrMakabar@slrpnk.net on 05 Jan 15:07 next collapse

Then why is China building aircraft carriers?

[deleted] on 05 Jan 15:37 collapse
.
AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 15:21 next collapse

TIL BRICS doesn’t exist.

bunchberry@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 15:39 next collapse

Multipolarity bros really need to stop fantasizing about BRICS being some sort of anti-imperialist military alliance It’s just delusion, BRICS isn’t a military bloc, it is about trade. It technically isn’t even a trading bloc either as it is literally just a forum to discuss trade relations. If you think any member of BRICS has defense obligations to one another then you are incredibly disconnected from reality.

AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 15:41 collapse

Tell it to Tibet, ya clanker

ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works on 05 Jan 16:07 collapse

The British Empire, whistling innocently.

AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 16:24 collapse

Your whataboutism is immaculate, but I’m not sure you’re actually helping here, Lockwarden.

ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works on 05 Jan 16:45 collapse

whataboutism Lockwarden

So you know the greater context then, of the British in Tibet, at the very least.

clot27@lemmy.zip on 05 Jan 17:14 collapse

brics is a total joke. one of the biggest member of brics is friends with everyone internationally.

[deleted] on 05 Jan 19:24 next collapse
.
Aljernon@lemmy.today on 06 Jan 08:50 collapse
Gates9@sh.itjust.works on 05 Jan 11:00 next collapse

China should dump all of its U.S. treasuries

SippyCup@lemmy.ml on 05 Jan 13:21 collapse

They literally can’t. Nor can the US dump theirs.

The US, the EU, and China are economically tied to one another. One of the reasons there hasn’t been a shooting war between the East and West is how much we depend on the other’s economy. Without foreign backed assets, there’s nothing to trade against.

Chinese made goods are bought with American dollars. If they’re not putting them back in to the US, there’s no need to take them in the first place. And then who, exactly, would China be making all that crap for?

rumba@lemmy.zip on 05 Jan 16:00 collapse

They literally can’t.

That really hasn’t stopped the US government recently.

phutatorius@lemmy.zip on 05 Jan 12:54 next collapse

Worse, a “world judge” that doesn’t accept the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.

“We make the rules, but rules don’t apply to us.”

MBech@feddit.dk on 05 Jan 19:24 next collapse

Even going so far as planning in details how to invade the International Criminal Court, if it ever dared to prosecute one of their soldiers for, say, murdering children in the streets.

Zink@programming.dev on 06 Jan 03:26 collapse

That sounds an awful lot like Wilhoit’s law, which I find myself referring to quite often lately.

Wilhoit’s law:

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

edit: So the US is the rich conservative of the world stage. Super. I love seeing the news every day and wondering if any more of these maga morons are going to finally have their “are we the baddies?” moment. /s

Fleur_@aussie.zone on 05 Jan 13:37 next collapse

Can you really blame them

TheKaul@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 05 Jan 14:24 next collapse

They must’ve not watchec this completely true documentary.

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/328b3d00-33e1-4d12-926c-0b535d764f74.webp">

gergolippai@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 16:03 collapse

The other day i was explaining my (teenager) kids how it was in the early 2000s and instead of a history lesson, i watched this with them. One of the best summariesof that age.

ms_lane@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 20:09 collapse

Imagine how much Freedom™ costs now with all the inflation?

gergolippai@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 07:36 collapse

All we know is: it isn’t free :)

Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 14:41 next collapse

There was even a Chinese delegation IN Venezuela at the time of the bombing wth lol 😂 😅

MrMakabar@slrpnk.net on 05 Jan 14:52 next collapse

and they meet Maduro a few hourse before he was kidnapped.

Blackmist@feddit.uk on 05 Jan 15:49 collapse

Well sure. They were buying most of Venezuela’s oil themselves.

MuskyMelon@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 16:58 collapse

What’s wrong with buying a product that’s for sale?

Paper_Phrog@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 17:15 next collapse

No one said it was wrong. It makes sense they have an embassy if they buy stuff.

Blackmist@feddit.uk on 07 Jan 10:43 collapse

Nothing per se, but it shows that it’s not US heavy handedness or national sovereignty they’re worried about, but rather their own business interests. And they should be. China needs oil, and the US is squeezing their pipelines.

They also buy a lot from Iran, which also looks as if it’s being destabilised.

inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 14:43 next collapse

The anus calling the butthole an asshole situation here.

BoJackHorseman@piefed.social on 05 Jan 16:59 collapse

China is nowhere near a terrorist as America.

Every regime change America has done in another country and installed a puppet, their economic situation never improved under the puppet leader.

<img alt="" src="https://media.piefed.social/posts/KR/ck/KRck2VP6cLVyfSS.jpg">

mriormro@lemmy.zip on 05 Jan 17:03 next collapse

Fucking lol, with this sino propaganda.

BoJackHorseman@piefed.social on 05 Jan 17:03 collapse

Stfu cia shill

mriormro@lemmy.zip on 05 Jan 17:08 collapse

How exactly am I a CIA shill? This is the kind of shit that makes people not take you seriously at all.

“Everyone must be a shill because they disagree with me!!”

I’m equally critical of both the US hegemony as well as that of China’s.

BoJackHorseman@piefed.social on 05 Jan 17:14 collapse

I’m saying China hasn’t bombed nearly as many countries as America. Yet China is evil and America good.

mriormro@lemmy.zip on 05 Jan 17:21 collapse

Take a moment to understand what you’re arguing here. China not bombing an equal number of countries (according to you) as the US does not absolve the PRC of their sins simply because you are comparing them to another imperial power. This is, like, textbook false equivalence.

You still haven’t answered exactly how I’m a CIA shill, btw.

BoJackHorseman@piefed.social on 05 Jan 18:44 collapse

China and America are the two biggest economies and armies of the world. It’s a fair comparison. Soon the world will have to choose between America and China.

It’s not “according to me”. History is proof of America’s terrorism. China hasn’t bombed a single country in over a century.

mriormro@lemmy.zip on 05 Jan 18:53 next collapse

Deep in that sino sauce, I see. You’re just a propagandist with no legitimate intent for discourse.

Peace, you dummy.

BoJackHorseman@piefed.social on 05 Jan 18:58 collapse

Looks like you have no arguments left to defend the “peace loving” west.

cheesybuddha@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 20:40 collapse

Bombing other countries isn’t the only metric you should be using.

BoJackHorseman@piefed.social on 06 Jan 19:02 collapse

As someone who lives on the earth, I care a lot about not being bombed.

What’s more important to you than not being bombed?

cheesybuddha@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 19:03 collapse

And that’s the only thing you care about?

BoJackHorseman@piefed.social on 06 Jan 19:07 collapse

I care about not dying a lot, yeah

cheesybuddha@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 19:11 collapse

And you know that people die other ways than being bombed, right?

Now, put it all together.

BoJackHorseman@piefed.social on 06 Jan 19:18 collapse

Like not being able to afford healthcare?

Being shot by a terrorist with a gun who looks just like you?

Yeah, America does all of that, besides bombing

NikkiDimes@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 18:55 collapse

They’re both pretty shit tbh. But also, Tiennamen Square lol

BoJackHorseman@piefed.social on 05 Jan 18:59 collapse

You’re gonna compare one bad thing done by China to hundreds done by America and claim both are equally bad lmao

NikkiDimes@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 19:05 collapse

More of a joke, really. Both countries have committed countless atrocities.

selokichtli@lemmy.ml on 06 Jan 06:51 collapse

No, count them, by all means.

NikkiDimes@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 08:02 collapse

Oh you’re right, Hitler A is a liiiittle bit worse than Hitler B.

selokichtli@lemmy.ml on 06 Jan 14:06 collapse

“Little bit worse”, “countless”, “big beautiful bill”, are you an American? If so, it really shows the USA barely maintains a Department of Education. If not, jeez, MAGA hats are everywhere.

NikkiDimes@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 18:48 collapse

I’m literally telling you they’re both bad and you’re saying I love America. Can you even read…? You’re also quoting stuff I never even said.

BoJackHorseman@piefed.social on 06 Jan 19:04 collapse

One guy slapped you, another guy shot 350 bullets on your 5 year old daughter. Both are equally bad.

NikkiDimes@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 20:01 collapse

Who ever said they were equal? If that’s what you interpreted, that’s on you.

wheezy@lemmy.ml on 05 Jan 15:40 next collapse

China is the world’s largest economy by every meaningful metric. No serious economist uses GDP as a metric for actual economic production. Can we please at least use GDP (PPP)?

en.wikipedia.org/…/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)

It’s still not a good metric but at least it actually allows a means to compare countries to one another more accurately.

The US economy is 10 major tech corporations doing essentially this with AI right now.

rumba@lemmy.zip on 05 Jan 15:54 next collapse

Naw, OpenAi pays oracle to agree to eat the crap Oracle pays nvidia to agree to eat the crap Nvidia pays OpenAi to agree to eat the crap

The consumers eat the crap as they reduce the memory and video cards available to the public.

ameancow@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 19:08 next collapse

Okay but what metric should we use for the average American median voter who just wants to see China enter a wrestling ring with pyrotechnics and then rock and roll music plays and we see the US hit them with a steel chair.

Even that might be too nuanced and complex for the average American voter.

booly@sh.itjust.works on 05 Jan 21:51 next collapse

No serious economist uses GDP as a metric for actual economic production. Can we please at least use GDP (PPP)?

In terms of flexing on foreign countries on the international stage, though, raw GDP (or at least imports and exports) is pretty important.

The PPP calculation comparing China to the United States may tell us a lot about how much a resident of either country can expect to experience using the local currency domestically, but if we’re talking about influence over a third country, in that third country’s local currency, then I think each respective PPP back home doesn’t matter as much.

wheezy@lemmy.ml on 05 Jan 23:14 collapse

If we’re not comparing the ability of a citizen to buy things with the fruit of their labor. What are we comparing?

I get what you’re saying. But it comes down to a fundamental problem with liberal (using the classical sense of the word) economist and what they are “flexing” about.

The “economy” to the average voter is how much the groceries and rent are.

Not even mentioning the “eating shit” problem of GDP. GDP PPP is far more meaningful to quality of life. Though still flawed. The normal person isn’t trying to understand the power of a currency on the world stage. They are using it to buy eggs.

booly@sh.itjust.works on 06 Jan 00:20 collapse

If we’re not comparing the ability of a citizen to buy things with the fruit of their labor. What are we comparing?

In this particular case? I think we’re comparing Chinese and American ability to project economic influence (from trade or aid, to outright bribes or coercion or boycotts or sanctions or everything in between) over Venezuela.

The normal person

But the normal person has nothing to do with governments dealing with other governments on the global stage. And that’s what this story is about, Venezuela being caught between two competing visions of their future in the international order.

If a country wants to build an airport in their capital city using the resources of foreign governments seeking to influence them, the question isn’t about how many eggs the citizens of those countries can buy in their home turf, but about how much concrete and steel and heavy machinery those other countries can provide in the country considering offers.

wheezy@lemmy.ml on 06 Jan 09:06 collapse

Do you think America competes at all in its ability to produce heavy machinery, concrete, and steel when compared to China?

We are far beyond the GDP vs. GDP(PPP) that started this. But, you brought it up. The US’s main problem is it’s lack of industrial production. It’s an almost entirely finance based economy. Which is something that causes its GDP to be heavily inflated. The AI companies trading the same billions in a circle with no actual material production happening in the country right now. The US economy is built on financial speculation. China’s is built on industrial production. Something GDP doesn’t account for at all.

That was my entire frustration with using GDP as a metric in the first place. I said “at least use GDP(PPP)” because at least it takes into account the populations purchasing power of goods.

On the world stage, as an economic power, the US is losing to China. It’s why it’s using its military to invade South American countries that trade with China. It has no real way to compete. So it’s falling back on it’s methods of imperialism.

booly@sh.itjust.works on 06 Jan 20:18 collapse

We are far beyond the GDP vs. GDP(PPP) that started this.

No, you started talking about PPP in response to a news story that described the United States and China competing over influence over the Venezuelan economy: Chinese aid and investment in response to United States sanctions. Those are essentially going to be dollar denominated, and PPP doesn’t matter. I’ve been saying from the beginning that you were wrong to bring PPP into the discussion, because this discussion, in this thread, isn’t about domestic consumption in either China or the U.S.

The US’s main problem is it’s lack of industrial production.

Again, when talking about the effects of sanctions and foreign aid and investment, we should be talking about transactions that occur in the currency at issue. If China wants to provide aid to Venezuela in RMB, Venezuela will either need to spend that on Chinese producers or exchange for another currency to spend elsewhere (including Venezuelan Bolivars being spent domestically). If there’s going to be a currency exchange, then PPP of the aid providing nation doesn’t matter. A million USD from China is worth the exact same amount as a million USD from the U.S.

On the world stage, as an economic power, the US is losing to China.

I think if we’re talking about on the world stage, as an economic power, the interconnected West is best understood as a power bloc. U.S. inconsistency and unpredictability on things like Russian sanctions actually show the limits of U.S. unilateral power while still showing the power of the broader Western order. Yes, China and Russia want to provide the world with an alternative multipolar order, and fragmentation of the Western powers may open up opportunities for that vision, but that competition is playing out along alliances, not isolated nations. In any event, PPP doesn’t have anything to do with that particular competition.

wheezy@lemmy.ml on 07 Jan 02:32 collapse

We’re just going to have to agree to disagree. I’m not going to bang my head against the wall trying to explain it to you. But I’ll give it one more shot.

The fact that you see PPP as only relevant in a bubble inside the country is just idiotic. China PRODUCES things. Literally most of its aid and initiatives are in the form of resources and infrastructure projects. There is no USD involved. That’s literally the entire Belt and Road project.

I’m sorry. But it seems like you’re trying to project what you know about US trade and neoliberal economic policies onto China. You clearly know enough about US trade and how it uses the dollar for dominance on world markets. But China doesn’t have to play that game anymore. That’s literally the shift in global economic trade that has happened. The world is not being held hostage by US dollar dominance anymore. They have an alternative in China.

And PPP is a much better means of showing why this is. It’s BECAUSE China actually makes shit. It’s not just a finance and consumption economy. It makes stuff more affordable for its population AND it’s able to use this same massive industrial power to work on industrial projects with other countries.

You are explaining a world that existed 20-30 years ago.

booly@sh.itjust.works on 08 Jan 16:09 collapse

We’re just going to have to agree to disagree.

I think that’s right. To summarize, here’s where I think we agree and disagree:

We agree: GDP is not a particularly good metric for measuring international economic influence.

We disagree: You think adjusting GDP by PPP makes it better for this context, and I think that adjustment makes it even worse.

We agree: Exports matter for discussing economic power on the international stage.

We disagree: I think imports and investment also matter. You clearly don’t, by dismissing them as mere consumption and financial engineering.

We agree: United States economic power overseas is in decline, including in the hegemony of the US Dollar, and its importance/influence through organizations like the World Bank, IMF, WTO, or even things like the SWIFT banking network.

We disagree: I think the United States is still much, much stronger than China on global economic influence. The lines may cross, where China overtakes the United States, but I think that would be in the future, whereas your comment suggests you believe those lines crossed in the past.

In the end, a country like Venezuela wants to sell barrels of oil to buyers, for a good price. That means things like U.S. sanctions (especially when enforced by the entire west) will hurt more than Chinese aid helps. At least as of 2026.

mohammed_alibi@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 07:46 collapse

China has 4x the population of the US. It should have 4x the GDP of the US to be truly equivalent.

wheezy@lemmy.ml on 06 Jan 08:50 collapse

You might want to let the people that studied econ beyond a lemonade stand just talk next time. You don’t need to type out every thought in your head.

You just gave the ultimate dumb guy response. Congratulations.

We’re discussing Calculus and you just responded with “yeah, well 2 + 2 = 4. I don’t know why those letters are in your math with that weird squiggly line at the start.”.

You clearly have no idea what we’re even discussing in this thread.

Blackmist@feddit.uk on 05 Jan 15:45 next collapse

While also making notes.

SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 15:49 next collapse

Maduro and Trump are friends

Maduro gets to escape his country and save face instead of being assassinated or executed.

Trump gets to manufacture a conflict so he can start martial law and become a dictator, and to distract from us learning he came inside little girls.

Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com on 06 Jan 00:20 collapse

You keep making up this shit in every post. Do you get paid to do so, CIA stooge?

MithranArkanere@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 16:56 next collapse

It would appear that the US got tired of all the jokes comparing them to the movie Idiocracy, so they decided to make themselves into Team America: World Police instead.

phar@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 22:21 next collapse

I mean…that’s why that movie was made to begin with…

NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 23:19 collapse

Trey Parker and Matt Stone should make the movie free for the week in honor of Team America World Police being back in action.

Zink@programming.dev on 06 Jan 03:20 next collapse

All of this has happened before. All of this will happen again.

:(

No_Eponym@lemmy.ca on 06 Jan 04:48 collapse

Found the Cylon.

Zink@programming.dev on 06 Jan 14:49 collapse

No toasters in these parts, my fellow biological human.

Vinylraupe@lemmy.zip on 06 Jan 08:58 collapse

Swap police with gangsters and i agree.

Inucune@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 17:10 next collapse

We agree, so let’s discuss the Chinese police stations in countries that are clearly not China.

BoJackHorseman@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 19:12 collapse

Let’s discuss the American military bases in countries that are clearly not America.

Natanael@infosec.pub on 05 Jan 20:09 collapse

At least the host country agreed to those

There’s real things to criticize, why pick something stupid?

Jhex@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 20:25 next collapse

same way I agree to give up my wallet when getting mugged?

Capsicones@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 05 Jan 22:11 next collapse

Yeah… Maybe ask the good folks of Okinawa whether they have ever agreed to American military bases.

FiniteBanjo@feddit.online on 06 Jan 02:55 collapse

You can’t tolerate the intolerant, Japan lost WWII and had to be demilitarized. It’s one thing to advocate for Remilitarize Japan, it’s another thing entirely to ask their proxy military to leave them defenceless.

raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 22:57 next collapse

Ahahah. The host country agreed to those. That’s priceless…

liuther9@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 08:59 next collapse

Sweet summer child

gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 06 Jan 10:28 next collapse

Agreement under duress isn’t really agreement

shawn1122@sh.itjust.works on 06 Jan 15:34 collapse

Hard power is often leveraged by state actors to coerce agreement / consent. It doesn’t necessarily invalidate consent but it certainly obscures it.

After WW2 Japan and Germany, for example, were not in a position to say no to US bases. I wouldn’t consider that legitimate consent.

DarkFuture@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 18:32 next collapse

And now I’m agreeing with China.

Thanks, Trump.

ameancow@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 19:06 next collapse

China is an authoritarian dictatorship that tramples human rights and treats its citizens like resources and speed-bumps and treats “free speech” as the joke it actually is.

All that said, they are pulling ahead on the world stage by miles. We don’t see it in the US because again… freedom of speech isn’t real, media is filtered, but if you travel you see whole other angles on the entire planet and just how much we don’t get shown.

For example, you rarely see news about it, but China has launched 3 space stations in the time it took us to make just the documentaries about the ISS and how huuuuge of an accomplishment it was for the world. They are going to be launching probes and setting up smart, realistic goals for exploring the solar system. That’s just not the kind high-tech, ambitious, modern project that we associate with our stereotypical imagery of China that we get fed here, but if you actually walk around in any of their new cities you will feel a distinct, sinking sensation that we’ve already lost.

BoJackHorseman@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 19:10 next collapse

Is bombing other countries, killing civilians and installing puppet leaders not a violation of human rights?

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/2e586986-0616-4ae8-9117-64a6c621ce08.jpeg">

ameancow@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 19:14 next collapse

No that’s just freedom, freedoming places that needed to be freedomed. Oohrah.

T00l_shed@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 19:25 next collapse

Two things can be true at once

BoJackHorseman@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 19:32 next collapse

Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones at others.

T00l_shed@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 19:47 next collapse

Kay, I’m not chinese or american, so, both the us and china do horrendous things. It’s not a shittiness competition

OldChicoAle@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 19:56 collapse

As an American I can say that the US and China are both bad…

BoJackHorseman@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 20:00 collapse

It’s like saying a slap on the wrist vs shooting someone with a gun are equally bad.

OldChicoAle@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 21:31 collapse

I think you’re missing a lot of US History in your knowledge base. The US have committed atrocities for centuries. Are you forgetting the genocide of native americans? Slavery? All the meddling in Latin America and southeast Asia? This is just some of the bigger examples.

Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz on 06 Jan 03:13 collapse

Are you responding to the wrong reply? Bojack is saying bringing up China’s human rights violations in comparison to America bombing people and overthrowing governments all over the world is a false equivalency, and Lemmy is downvoting them because the are correct.

AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml on 05 Jan 23:27 collapse

False equivalency and a fascist talking point

T00l_shed@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 23:56 collapse

No, and no.

rustyfish@piefed.world on 06 Jan 20:37 collapse

Alright. The US acted like crap. Therefore nobody is allowed to criticise China. 

Because of the US, we are not allowed to speak about the Uyghur KZs in China.

Because of the US, we are not allowed to criticise China for unlawfully occupying Tibet.

Because of the US, we are not allowed to criticise China for not respecting Taiwans sovereignty. 

Do you understand how hollow you sound?

Darkness343@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 20:05 next collapse

So what if they do a little authoritarianism? They are attempting to make goddamn fusions reactors, for fucks sake

Jhex@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 20:24 next collapse

whoosh

ameancow@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 20:33 collapse

It’s important to point out balancing factors when discussing the accomplishments of any entity or state.

China is doing amazing things and will likely dominate the coming century, but that doesn’t mean we should look at them like heroes or champions, and we need to hold our leaders accountable for wrongs.

It’s possible they will get better as they take on more of a global role in the absence of the US hegemony that will likely start to crumble over the next several decades. I hope they give their people more rights and become leaders of world stability, but part of why they’re escaping the destabilizing forces that are crushing democratic countries is precisely because they have such an oppressive stranglehold on their own culture. It’s a complex situation.

raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 23:00 next collapse

Three what now? Do you mean three modules for one station? Or three consecutive stations, one testing technology for the next? E.g. a short time station, e.g. a crew vehicle? I am only aware of one station, Tiangong. Do I have to do another web search? :(

INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone on 06 Jan 03:45 next collapse

There’s just the one.

It can only house three people.

raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 07:24 collapse

Yeah, that is what I thought. Still, I was impressed when they launched it as announced.

INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone on 06 Jan 09:26 collapse

He may have meant one space station and some extra moon missions or something? They have been popping off a fair bit.

Honestly, I don’t care what country dominates and wins the space race, i will just be impressed that we don’t kill each other trying.

raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 12:47 collapse

I would prefer for it to be an international cooperation - but we’re just fucking this up big time :/

INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone on 07 Jan 03:43 collapse

I feel like that astronaut ‘always-has-been’ meme would drop pretty hard right now

ameancow@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 15:43 collapse

The current monster they have completed in 2022, Tiangong, was the third in a series of stations, the previous Tiangong-1 and Tiangong-2 stations were mostly meant to test technique and technology but were remarkable achievements in their own right. They currently have the largest and most active space program in the world. I didn’t even touch on their lunar program, their heavy satellite capability and their list of recent and upcoming solar-system probes.

raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 16:04 collapse
  1. I don’t think monster is an appropriate word for a space station.
  2. so yeah, Tiangong-1 & -2 were single vehicle modules for technology evaluation. Similar to Skylab in concept (single launch, test docking technologies & crewed missions)
  3. as impressive as the Chinese space program is, the ISS is substantially bigger. Sadly, the world has not gotten their shit together in time for a follow-up station, and Gateway is pretty much dead-at-conception.
ameancow@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 16:11 collapse

Oh the ISS is definitely bigger than anything ever sent to space, as I would expect from an international project that was built by a coalition of countries in better days, but it doesn’t really compare to China’s long-term goals and plans that have been on schedule. China is absolutely dominating space right now and will be into the future unless the US just suddenly gets it shit together and elects people who care about science and exploration, and even then it will take many years or decades now to undo the damage that trumpism has done to the US’s global leadership in space science.

The ISS is going to be deorbited in 2031, and I am not expecting a bigger, newer project to replace it. At this point I am not expecting to have access to health care broadly in 2031 in the US.

raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 16:37 collapse

No argument there. China definitely has the better and more advanced space program. The ISS might get extended again if it doesn’t break and once people realize there is nothing comparable ready by 2030/31, but yes, eventually, there will be no international nor western space station in orbit for the foreseeable future.

Aljernon@lemmy.today on 06 Jan 08:45 next collapse

Americans still associate China with shit quality merchandise while glossing over that that merchandise is made shit quality because American Importers selected that level of quality and completely ignoring that they make I Phones and other High quality tech.

ameancow@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 15:24 collapse

This is absolutely right and a good point that I think a lot of people really don’t get. China isn’t filled with the cheap shit we get from China, they have a thriving middle-class, they have luxury goods the likes of which westerners haven’t dreamed of. They have quality standards for goods and services probably higher than most places.

It’s just that since we get their cheap dollar-store merch and we read stories about traditional Chinese medicine, we get the picture here that they’re still largely a backwards, “3rd-world” nation of rice farmers and peasants. It would be like judging the entire US on a sampling of people from the mountains of Appalachia.

Related, but I also find it hilarious when people reference China as “communist” in any capacity.

Jhex@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 14:03 collapse

China is an authoritarian dictatorship that tramples human rights and treats its citizens like resources and speed-bumps and treats “free speech” as the joke it actually is.

if you switched “China” to “The USA” in this sentence, I would have to find details to see if the scale is different but both do exactly the same

ameancow@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 15:19 collapse

Yep. There is no government that actually serves the people, governments serve self-preservation and they tend to do heinous shit to succeed at that. We are not an evolved species but really only because we lack the will to be better broadly.

As individuals we each have vast capacity for learning, caring and understanding the world around us. As a generalized population we are a liquid that flows to the lowest point and erodes everything it touches.

Jhex@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 18:17 collapse

I agree… but my point here is that it does not matter it was China who said “x”, in this instance “x” is right and people are dismissing it because “cHiNA” but the reality is that every country, powerful enough, acts pretty much the same so I am attempting to split the source from the message

BoJackHorseman@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 19:11 collapse

All this time you’ve been agreeing with a terrorist organisation, you just didn’t know it.

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/eeca7203-935e-4760-a44f-6a37e287eb7c.jpeg">

Limerance@piefed.social on 05 Jan 23:30 collapse

What do you think of China‘s Invasion of Korea and Vietnam around the same time?

Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz on 06 Jan 03:22 collapse

Invasion of Korea lmao. The north had democratic elections, the south had a sham election that resulted in an administration which put people who’d colluded with the japanese back into power, and the US was literally murdering anyone left of Syngman Rhee as a prelude to taking the rest of the peninsula.

Whatever you think about Korea now, China was absolutely fighting for the liberation of its people.

The sino-vietnamese war was 25 years later, and a much more legitimate criticism of China’s foreign policy.

Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 04:04 collapse

How about Kuwait?

Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz on 06 Jan 04:38 collapse

I assume you mean when Saddam, with the US’s weapons and blessing, invaded Kuwait, then was shocked the US betrayed their old friend?

If so, I have absolutely no idea how its relevant to China.

Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world on 07 Jan 10:01 collapse

Was from a comment up a bit.

Also Wat? US blessing of the invasion?

Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz on 07 Jan 10:12 collapse
Pacattack57@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 19:59 next collapse

For anyone that thinks otherwise I guarantee this opens the door for China to begin their assault on Taiwan.

ChairmanMeow@programming.dev on 05 Jan 22:32 next collapse

I’m not so sure it does. China is openly arguing against Trumps logic here, and the US just did demonstrate their military is still highly effective. The US seventh fleet hasn’t moved away from Taiwan, and Trump is clearly signalling he intends to keep China down.

I’d argue Xi is not happy Trump decided to actually do something like this, because it increased the risk of his plans with Taiwan as well now that the US is openly hostile and MAGA cheers it on.

China needed him to keep up the whole peace pretense and for MAGA to stay on board with that. Now that that’s gone, Trump has cleared the way for more military intervention.

echodot@feddit.uk on 06 Jan 07:13 next collapse

MAGA is actually currently having a bit of a crisis of confidence. One of the promises Trump made was to stop the empire building and international interference. Now he’s going around causing an international incident every 45 minutes.

He has gone from saying that it was a single strike, to threatening more strikes against Venezuela, to threatening yet other countries in the last 24 hours.

ChairmanMeow@programming.dev on 06 Jan 07:18 next collapse

A random Xitter account crying foul isn’t a sign of widespread crisis of confidence. Only 6% of Republicans don’t approve of the Maduro kidnapping. His approval rating went up a bit since the kidnapping (38% -> 42%).

His base, by and large, support the warmongering.

Lucelu2@lemmy.zip on 06 Jan 23:10 collapse

cult members gotta cult

icelimit@lemmy.ml on 06 Jan 08:36 next collapse

Maga gets hard from a show of strength, regardless of what form that takes. Even if it means cannibalising done of their own.

Aljernon@lemmy.today on 06 Jan 08:40 next collapse

The thing about bootlickers is that they love licking boot. As long as we’re winning and not losing, they’ll obediently fall in line. If things turn to shit, like it did in Iraq & Afghanistan, they’ll pretend they were always against it.

Mulligrubs@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 22:01 collapse

In the USA, this is known as the “old switcheroo”.

Our politicians are infamous for doing the exact opposite of their platform.

For example, Reagan ran on sealing the borders and isolationism, only to declare amnesty for border hoppers and revel in international intervention.

Biden ran on increasing the minimum wage and other working class American concerns. Did he do this? No.

Our major parties aren’t actually concerned with their platforms, that’s performative.

Jhex@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 14:02 next collapse

and the US just did demonstrate their military is still highly effective

hmmmm sucker punching Venezuela here is not the flex you seem to think it is

the USA loves to bat weaker military powers around but they have been shown to be crushed by peasants in the long run…

ChairmanMeow@programming.dev on 06 Jan 19:34 collapse

In a matter of hours the US kidnapped the president of Venezuela, from his house on an army base, taking zero casualties. I don’t think there’s many militaries around that can beat that. It’s not the same as capturing Putin or Xi, sure, but it’s no trifle either.

Jhex@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 19:49 collapse

you’ve never been to Venezuela, have you?

ChairmanMeow@programming.dev on 07 Jan 00:43 collapse

How many other heads of state do you remember being kidnapped from their palace, like from anywhere?

Of course Venezuela is no China or Russia and doesn’t compare to the US military, but they did have fairly modern Russian-made AA installations, all of which were successfully disabled or destroyed. And again: zero casualties.

You expect the operation would be successful, sure. But not as perfectly executed as it was.

Jhex@lemmy.world on 07 Jan 02:10 collapse

How many other heads of state do you remember being kidnapped from their palace, like from anywhere?

how many have been tried?

ChairmanMeow@programming.dev on 07 Jan 21:34 collapse

Which is the point, it’s rarely tried because it’s very risky and unlikely to succeed or achieve your goals. The US military however was capable enough.

prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca on 06 Jan 23:15 collapse

From China’s perspective (and in theory, Taiwan’s perspective), invading Taiwan isn’t the same, because they both officially recognize One China, they just disagree about who’s in charge.

It would more akin to USA invading Puerto Rico, if the governor of PR asserted that they were in fact the proper leaders of the USA.

ChairmanMeow@programming.dev on 07 Jan 21:36 collapse

China also knows that other countries don’t exactly share that perspective. And it certainly won’t persuade Trump to not continue his anti-China policies.

bastion@feddit.nl on 05 Jan 23:12 next collapse

this is how things work, and some people seem incapable of understanding that.

You exercise a given power, and it gives others justification to use power in the same way. Laws be damned, the motivation is there.

NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 23:17 next collapse

China claims Taiwan is theirs. Invading their own country to free it doesn’t really need any extra motive (even if there is) like what Trump needed, and is not playing world police.

Knightfox@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 01:20 collapse

100% agree, also China’s outrage is in name only. They provided 1.6 Billion in relief in the form of buying oil lol.

tym@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 20:37 next collapse

Translation: China just lost a $4.6 billion investment

We’re really going to war with them, aren’t we? FFS

optissima@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 22:46 next collapse

Translation: An insane man has most of the nukes in the world and is ignoring international law.

LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 06 Jan 02:56 next collapse

Oh, not just them. The fascists want to invade all North America and South America. We could very depressingly actually find ourselves on opposite sides of an armed conflict sometime soon. I mean, I’m a disabled trans woman and I am somewhat doubtful that anyone will be depending on me to shoot a gun, but you know. Maybe more like we could find ourselves being shot at by each country’s respective combat drones.

gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 06 Jan 10:30 collapse

Yeah, sure kid

echodot@feddit.uk on 06 Jan 07:11 next collapse

This also gives justification to North Korea. They’ve been arguing for ages that they should be allowed nuclear weapons because otherwise the US would come in and force a regime change, and now Trumpsky has just handed them the evidence.

Aljernon@lemmy.today on 06 Jan 08:37 collapse

All that NK artillery was the real deterrent. Before NK developed Nukes, after the cold war the US could have relatively easily crushed them except for the incredible amount of collateral damage they could have done to SK. However, in the post Ukraine/Trump presidency age, securing a stock of nukes or joining a defense coalition that includes at least one member with nukes seems like the wise decision. Heart breaking really.

Vinylraupe@lemmy.zip on 06 Jan 08:53 collapse

The US could also have easily crushed the Vietnamese./s

Aljernon@lemmy.today on 06 Jan 09:21 next collapse

The key difference, for those unfamiliar with Asia or history, is that South Korea is a cohesive modern nation with a competent military and a strong sense of national identity that feel genuine friendship with the US (for now at least). All things that weren’t true about South Vietnam.

Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz on 06 Jan 10:56 collapse

South Korea was essentially invented by the US in 1947, it took trillions in investment, and decades of propaganda+imprisoning/killing everyone left of Sygmon Rhee to create the nation of South Korea…

Warl0k3@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 11:01 collapse

I think you’re giving the US way too much credit here. They helped south korea establish itself with a massive investment, but they didn’t “invent” the country, and its pretty insulting to south koreans that you’re so willing to take away their agency in the matter.

Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz on 06 Jan 11:04 collapse

There literally was no South Korea, just Korea before the US drew a line on a map.

thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 14:59 collapse

if i remember correctly, the north koreans also had a role to play in drawing that map, seeing as how the north korean army was pushed all the way north to china’s border.

Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz on 07 Jan 04:24 collapse

No, I mean at the end of WWII, there was just japanese-occupied Korea, the US drew the line, held a sham election to put their puppet in power, and prepared to take the rest of Korea.

Warl0k3@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 09:25 collapse

Well… yeah, we could have.

If war was literally as simple as “kill the other person and damn the consequences” the US could have casually wiped out the viet cong at pretty much any point during the war. The political consequences for doing so were the limiting factor - an extreme example, but we could have just nuked north vietnam to glass and been done with it (and obviously that wasn’t a realistic option (despite the number of times some psycho general or the other tried to advocate for it)).

Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz on 06 Jan 09:56 next collapse

If war was literally as simple as “kill the other person and damn the consequences” the US could have casually wiped out the viet cong at pretty much any point during the war.

They tried that towards the end, sending B-52s to carpet bomb Hanoi. Dozens of planes were shot down, hundreds survived, thousands of civilians were killed. If the US continued, they would have managed to kill hundreds of thousands of civilians, but eventually they’d run out of planes before the Vietnamese ran out of people or willingness to defend themselves.

Warl0k3@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 10:58 next collapse

They escalated, yes - absolutely not denying that. But the point was that they didn’t just nuke the city. Winning was important, but there was a point that the consequences of winning were deemed to outweigh the victory itself.

Zexks@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 13:49 collapse

You all act like we didnt already have dozens of nukes at that ppint and couldnt straight up glass the entire country. It wasnt capability that stopped the US is was political willpower or lack there of.

bold_atlas@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 10:04 collapse

we coulda won but we just didn’t feel like it.

Not a very convincing argument.

Warl0k3@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 10:52 collapse

That’s an oversimplification to the point that it really doesn’t represent my argument at all, though. But to treat with what you said, I’m not sure how

The US didn’t “feel” like winning the war was so important it justified nuking north vietnam

is a bad representation of the situation? The US didn’t drop sarin on the ho chi minh trail, nor did they nuke Hanoi, mobilize full wartime production, draft the “desirables” etc. Politics are a massive part of any war. “An army marches on it’s stomach” isn’t simply a literal adage about the importance of supplies.

Aljernon@lemmy.today on 06 Jan 08:33 next collapse

They’re not wrong but also the last thing those assholes want is anyone judging their shitty behavior. Ulterior Motives and all.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 06 Jan 08:48 next collapse

because you dont want attention when you eventually want to take over taiwan

minorkeys@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 10:29 next collapse

Unless it’s China whose the judge, of course. They seem to find no issue judging the Uygurs as needing to die and Taiwan as their property, or the the South China Sea as their waters, or all the fish in the world as theirs to make extinct.

Jhex@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 13:58 next collapse

different from other imperialists nations, how?

_Nico198X_@europe.pub on 06 Jan 14:14 next collapse

or supporting Russia judging Ukraine, also totally ok.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 19:25 collapse

They seem to find no issue judging the Uygurs as needing to die

Are they killing Uyghurs by the millions or teaching them Mandarin?

So much of the hysteria around China seems to stem from domestic campaigns of infrastructure development. The Three Gourges Dam, the rapid expansion of urban infrastructure, development of schools and hospitals in the historically rural corners of the country, expansion of universities, trade with East Africa, the BRI - all described as brutal forms of colonial oppression by a savage and sadistic Far-Left Totalitarian Communist government.

Nobody described Bolsonaro’s Brazil in these terms, as his administration clear cut the Amazon and rapidly displaced tens of thousands of migrants. Nobody described The Phillipines or Indonesia this way, even as Red Tagging was used as an excuse for vigilante executions and toxic dumping sent cancer rates stratospheric. Hell, its hard enough to get Israel described in these terms in any major western publication of record, and they’re outright shooting children in the head before labeling them “Hamas Terrorists”.

Why are liberals so eager to re-characterize literacy programs as a form of holocaust? Why do they seem so gleeful at the prospect of a China-Taiwan hot war? Why do we have a President threatening to invade Venezuela, Nigeria, and Greenland all at once, while his biggest “critics” complain that he’s not bellicose enough?

Fucking wild times.

C1pher@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 11:09 next collapse

And what will they do hmm? Will they sell their low quality, slave labour shit elsewhere? Yea, didnt think so.

BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 06 Jan 15:41 collapse

They just sell all the fucking bonds they have and tank them, the market for them, and the USA economy. Unless something has changed and i doubt it, China is the largest holder of USA debt related bonds sales in the world. It’s myopic to think the only way to wage war in this day and age is through bullets with boots on the ground.

Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de on 06 Jan 16:01 collapse

As if US would ever pay that back…

BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 06 Jan 16:12 collapse

Oh we’d have to, it’s a promise of its value. If China tanks the market then they’re worthless for everyone holding one and can call on them immediately for their value. If we don’t then no one will lend us money or buy them.

Honytawk@lemmy.zip on 06 Jan 13:57 next collapse

Aren’t they only saying that so they can annex Taiwan without interference?

foggianism@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 18:56 collapse

so what if they do at this point? who’s to say they are the bad guys if they do it?

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 18:58 collapse

Taiwan is America’s property in the same way that Venezuela is America’s property and Greenland is America’s property and Nigeria is America’s property and everything is America’s property.

BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today on 06 Jan 20:03 next collapse

Imagine if China claimed Hawaii or Key West, and vowed to attack with everything they had if we took back our own land?

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 20:20 collapse

Awarding a distant relative of Hawaii’s last king the Star of Lenin while declaring ownership over all the pineapples on the island chain.

optissima@lemmy.ml on 07 Jan 01:12 collapse

Can’t be better said.

BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today on 06 Jan 20:01 next collapse

MAGAs keep saying that this isn’t about the oil because the oils fields are inoperative, and it will be at least a decade, and billions of dollars before they are getting any oil out of the ground.

Meanwhile, we’ve been hijacking giants tankers full of oil, and China, and other countries, have been buying billions of dollars worth every year.

It seems like there is plenty of oil coming out of Venezuela, and always has been. This is all about oil, and that’s all there is to it. They can deny it, but they are proven virtuoso liars, and we don’t have to believe them.

AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 21:19 next collapse

It also cannot accept others acting as judges when it finally invades Taiwan.

vga@sopuli.xyz on 06 Jan 21:37 next collapse

Yet this is exactly the kind of action they fully supproted when Russia attempted the exactly same thing in 2022. And then several times since. Plus a few other atrocities.

tb_@lemmy.world on 06 Jan 23:41 collapse

Since Taiwan is “already part” of China, that would just be internal affairs too.

phoenixz@lemmy.ca on 07 Jan 03:43 collapse

And this differs from China with Taiwan in… Hi e exactly? Beyond the point that China hasn’t attacked Taiwan YET, there isn’t that much difference.

The US ad China are both always behaving like a bag of dicks and both should fuck right off