Plans to take Gaza City are met with defiance from war-weary Palestinians and anger by many Israelis (apnews.com)
from Stamau123@lemmy.world to world@lemmy.world on 09 Aug 01:38
https://lemmy.world/post/34166626

TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Israel’s decision to take over Gaza City was met with resignation and defiance by Palestinians who have survived two years of war and repeated raids. Many Israelis responded with fear and anger, worried it could be a death sentence for hostages held in Gaza.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced on Friday that Israel would intensify its 22-month war with Hamas by taking over Gaza City, large parts of which have been destroyed by past bombardment and ground incursions.

A major ground operation is almost sure to cause more mass displacement and worsen an already catastrophic humanitarian crisis.

“What does (Israel) want from us? … There is nothing here to occupy,” said a woman in Gaza City who identified herself as Umm Youssef. “There is no life here. I have to walk every day for more than 15 minutes to get drinking water.”

Ruby Chen, a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen whose son, Itay, is a hostage held in Gaza, told The Associated Press that the decision puts the remaining hostages in danger.

“What is the plan now that is different from the last 22 months?” he said.

#world

threaded - newest

Eyekaytee@aussie.zone on 09 Aug 02:22 next collapse

What does (Israel) want from us?

the hostages and hamas to disarm? i thought this was well known

A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world on 09 Aug 02:40 next collapse

They don’t care about the hostages or Hamas, Bibi just wants to get rich selling the land.

gedaliyah@lemmy.world on 09 Aug 11:36 collapse

Bibi just wants to stay in power and out of jail.

A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world on 09 Aug 12:49 collapse

That too yeah

His travel options are severely limited lol

fif-t@fedia.io on 09 Aug 02:55 next collapse

Hamas has made an offer of surrendering completely, returning the prisoners of war (as well as any hostages) and leaving forever in exchange for a Palestinian state. Israel has repeatedly rejected that deal. I wonder why?

NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io on 09 Aug 03:49 next collapse

Hell, they accepted it once and then reneged on it. That was the Trump deal.

Eyekaytee@aussie.zone on 09 Aug 05:14 collapse

Hamas has made an offer of surrendering completely, returning the prisoners of war (as well as any hostages) and leaving forever in exchange for a Palestinian state

Source

NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io on 09 Aug 05:55 collapse

Hamas Member of Parliament Khalil al-Hayya, also deputy chairman of the Hamas Political Bureau, told the Associated Press in April 2024 that Hamas is willing to agree to a truce of five years or more with Israel and that it would lay down its weapons and convert into a political party if an independent Palestinian state is established along pre-1967 borders.

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamas#7_Oct_2023%E2%80%93present

Hamas's goal has been a Palestinian state for years now. Also, Hamas had already agreed to give back the hostages and not rebuild its military capabilities in Trump's January ceasefire; it was Israel who reneged on that like it has reneged on every other ceasefire agreement it has ever signed.

Eyekaytee@aussie.zone on 09 Aug 06:20 next collapse

Al-Hayya said Hamas does not regret the Oct. 7 attacks, despite the destruction it has brought down on Gaza and its people. He denied that Hamas militants had targeted civilians during the attacks — despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary — and said the operation succeeded in its goal of bringing the Palestinian issue back to the world’s attention.

Damn they really don’t give a shit about their own civilians, just fodder for western leftists

The worst thing for Israel is dead Palestinian children

The best thing for Hamas is dead Palestinian children

NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io on 09 Aug 06:22 next collapse

That has literally nothing to do with what you said.

mrdown@lemmy.world on 09 Aug 11:53 next collapse

The worst thing for Israel is dead Palestinian children

They want all palestinians gone

Eyekaytee@aussie.zone on 09 Aug 13:19 collapse

no they don’t lol

there’s 2.2 million of them in a space the size of Manhattan, if they wanted to genocide them they could have done it 1000x over by now

Over a span of around 100 days, members of the Tutsi ethnic group, as well as some moderate Hutu and Twa, were systematically killed by Hutu militias. While the Rwandan Constitution states that over 1 million people were killed, most scholarly estimates suggest between 500,000 and 800,000 Tutsi died, mostly men.[5][6][7] The genocide was marked by extreme violence, with victims often murdered by neighbours, and widespread sexual violence, with between 250,000 and 500,000 women raped

and they did it mainly with machettes

that is a genocide

fif-t@fedia.io on 09 Aug 13:51 next collapse

Genocide isn't about the number of deaths. It's about the intent.

If you listen to what Israelis and Israeli leaders are saying, and the pattern of actions, it fits the definition of genocide.

In previous cases of genocide, explicit statements of intent wasn't required to call it as such (and we have them this time), as the actions and patterns of behaviour were enough to ascribe intent.

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

1 Killing members of the group;

2 Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

3 Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

4 Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

5 Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Only one of the list needs to be fulfilled in order to be considered genocide. 1, 2, and 3 have been demonstrated. With intent.

Even if we put genocide aside, you cannot deny the ethnic cleansing aspect.

Eyekaytee@aussie.zone on 09 Aug 14:49 collapse

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed

I don’t care for any legal definition tbh, if anything trying to check boxes (with the icj quoting tweets? how low will we go :\ ) it feels like the word has been completely watered down from meaning I’m going to go door to door, house to house and kill every single one of you, I’m going to cut you into pieces, rape your wife and children then cut them into pieces, I’m going to capture you, put you and everyone you know on trains, torture you, and then gas you until not one of your people are left…to whatever Gaza is…

Even if we put genocide aside, you cannot deny the ethnic cleansing aspect.

There’s definitely war crimes in there from both sides, Israel is not doing itself any favours taking out an apartment building to take out 1 to 2 hamas members, that’s a bit cold, it’s why I’m surprised the palestinians haven’t risen up and killed every hamas member out there as surely they must recognise hamas are radioactive

Hundreds join Gaza’s largest anti-Hamas protest since war began

The protests in northern Gaza came a day after Islamic Jihad gunmen launched rockets at Israel, prompting an Israeli decision to evacuate large parts of Beit Lahia, which sparked public anger in the area.

www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g71lk09npo

But nothing really major since then?

en.wikipedia.org/…/2025_Gaza_Strip_anti-Hamas_pro…

I just wish this shitshow was over so we can go back to focusing on Ukraine :(

mrdown@lemmy.world on 09 Aug 15:02 next collapse

You don’t care about the legal definition because you are a savage who don’t believe in international laws and civilized societies

You claim to be against extremism while defending jewish extremism

fif-t@fedia.io on 09 Aug 16:36 collapse

You're clearly blind, not because you can't see the atrocities being committed but because you either don't want to or don't care to.

I'm done trying to convince you of anything.

Eyekaytee@aussie.zone on 09 Aug 18:02 collapse

ok? i didn’t realise you were trying so hard, why do you feel the need to convince me of anything? we’re chatting on a forum not fighting on the front line

im also more than capable of coming to my own opinions on things, i’ve never changed my mind after 80 left wing progressives hounded me into submission, just like 80 conservatives can’t hound me into saying that being gay is a bad thing no matter how many “science facts” they throw at me

while i can see israel doing bad things, i know exactly how jihadi’s act since i’ve been watching and reading about them in depth since 2001, they are by far the most evil fighters in the world, nobody straps tnt to a toddler like an islamic jihadi, and i have very little sympathy for any town/city/group that harbours them

if you watch for example

Mosul offensive: Fighting ISIS on the frontline in Iraq

m.youtube.com/watch?v=Zx6U3x2M3XA

even the iraqi army struggles to determine who is a civilian and who is an islamic jihadi, because (surprise surprise) the jihadis hide in plain clothes amongst women and children

they were even scared to let a woman with a child in worried she was a suicide bomber

i completely understand why israel would rather stay 100 yards away and bomb from the air rather than go into a snake pit

so my question is where is hamas and where are the palestinians?

fif-t@fedia.io on 09 Aug 18:19 collapse

Hamas is an idea. Even if every single Hamas fighter were magically killed instantly, Hamas 2 would pop up because of what Israel has done and continues to do. Hamas itself doesn't really matter.

Also lumping together Iraqi jihadis (as you call them) with Palestinians and their liberation resistance movement is kinda racist. They're not the same.

For the record I do not advocate for Hamas, nor do I support their actions but their existence is inevitable.

The real question you should be asking is why is there a fascist ethnostate in the first place? And why is it propped up by Western countries?

Eyekaytee@aussie.zone on 11 Aug 04:59 collapse

Also lumping together Iraqi jihadis (as you call them) with Palestinians and their liberation resistance movement is kinda racist.

lol all Jihadi’s look the same to me🤣

And why is it propped up by Western countries

It’s not? The economy of Israel is incredible, it’s a true 1st world western economy surrounded by awful trillion dollar islamic authoritarian petro-states and awful backwards islamic hellholes, America would have already invaded and stuck a starbucks, mcdonalds and giant american flag right in the middle of Gaza if it was next to it

mrdown@lemmy.world on 09 Aug 15:01 next collapse

Learn the definition of genocide first instead of embarassing your self. Why netenyahu call the west bank as judea when judea was destroyed thousands of year ago? Why they build settlements in palestinians lands, why they stsrve gazans, why did he compare all gazans to amalek? Why israel destroy all palestinians historical sites? Why does honest israelis ask palestinians to live in egypt?

noMoreTwat@sh.itjust.works on 09 Aug 15:22 collapse

Some people are on the eipstein list.

You’re on the denialist

filister@lemmy.world on 09 Aug 22:06 collapse

If this was really the worst, then they did a very sloppy job.

gedaliyah@lemmy.world on 09 Aug 11:35 collapse

Pre-1967 borders include most of Jerusalem and the 4 holiest Jewish sites. Imagine if Israel said they would offer peace in exchange for Mecca and Medina.

mrdown@lemmy.world on 09 Aug 11:51 next collapse

Internstional law say that all lands stolen by israel in 67 is palestinians. They csn visit thosr sites as forrigner or accept a one state solution

fif-t@fedia.io on 09 Aug 12:58 next collapse

Imagine a bunch of foreigners coming in, and deciding that the majority of your farmable land should belong to them.

Oh wait, I don't have to. That's how Israel was created.

I'd prefer pre-1947 borders but pre-1967 is better than nothing.

[deleted] on 09 Aug 15:22 next collapse
.
noMoreTwat@sh.itjust.works on 09 Aug 15:23 next collapse

Mecca and Medina aren’t in Palestine. It might include “most of Jerusalem” but it’s the border recognized by international laws. Fact don’t care about your feelings

AstaKask@lemmy.cafe on 09 Aug 15:54 next collapse

It’s the same fucking cult anyway, only different sects. They can share. Oh wait, religious people are immature children so they literally can’t.

fif-t@fedia.io on 09 Aug 18:21 collapse

If only it were about religion (hint: it's never been about religion)

AstaKask@lemmy.cafe on 09 Aug 21:06 collapse

Religion is crucial to making people not question authority, to make them ignore what they hear and what they see, to make them feel not responsible for their actions. Submission is incredibly dangerous, and it’s what the whole cult of Yahweh is founded on.

fif-t@fedia.io on 09 Aug 21:10 collapse

Except Zionism was started by secular Jews and Zionists today are mostly Evangelical Christians. Israel and its creation has always been colonial and not religious. Religion is mostly a fig leaf/cover for it.

To paraphrase from Ilan Pappe, "Most Zionists don't believe in God, but they believe God promised them Israel"

filister@lemmy.world on 09 Aug 22:04 next collapse

I guess you have no problems with Russia annexing Donbas and Crimea then.

NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io on 10 Aug 16:19 collapse

Your attempt to derail the conversation because the facts aren't on your side has been noticed, but I'll bite.

There are about a hundred and one different ways one could solve this problem. For example, Israel could have custodianship over the relevant holy sites like Jordan does over the Temple Mount. For another, any kind of agreement could be worked out to let Israeli citizens visit these sites (as long as Palestinians are allowed to visit the Temple Mount). Alternatively, we could decide that this all makes no sense for a hundred different reasons and go for a one-state solution with no borders in historical Palestine. Point being: This is not and has never been a serious hurdle towards peace, only an excuse. In serious peace negotiations in the near future, Israel's position would be so strong as to make getting such concessions from the Palestinian side trivial. I should point out, though, that it's far from guaranteed that this will be the case in fifteen or twenty years; at that point Israel would be forced to make concessions that actually hurt.

gedaliyah@lemmy.world on 10 Aug 21:38 collapse

You are still defending Hamas. They have never offered or agreed to any plausible peace deal. They have only made demands in order to keep the fighting going.

Israel has released 100s of prisoners, including violent terrorists who murdered peace activists. That’s dozens of times more individuals than Hamas has released or ever agreed to release.

Israel has offered safe passage to friendly countries for Hamas leadership to step down and release remaining hostages.

In the end I believe you are right that Israel will have to make even more painful concessions if they continue down this path. Hamas has demonstrated that they will fight to the last man no matter how many Palestinians have to suffer or die while they hide in their tunnels and continue to torture their hostages.

NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io on 10 Aug 23:28 collapse

I see you're desperate to derail the conversation again now that your first attempt has failed. It's painfully obvious and does your monstrosity of a cause no good, so you should consider stopping. I won't dignify this with a response since you and everyone else reading this knows exactly what I was going to say, but I'll just note that in the comment you're responding to, the word "Hamas" appears exactly zero times.

gedaliyah@lemmy.world on 11 Aug 00:27 collapse

Maybe too many people have blocked you or something, so I’m not sure if you just can’t see that Hamas is the entire discussion of this thread from the first comments.

It’s no surprise to me that someone would fling accusations rather than responding with anything substantive, although that’s not me. I’ve made the point, and provided widely available and globally relied upon sources. You have replied with name calling and rhetoric, so I am okay with your decision not to respond. Probably better for both of us.

Aussieiuszko@aussie.zone on 09 Aug 04:40 next collapse

So not only are you racist towards Aboriginal peoples, but you’re also a Zionist?

It’s like you’re speed running being a terrible person.

polysexualstick@lemmy.world on 09 Aug 05:26 collapse

Yes, Netanyahu is a far-right extremist and saying he only wants Hamas to surrender at this point is wild.

But Zionism itself is not the problem here. The problem is fascism. Zionism is only the idea that Israel as a Jewish state should exist. That could very well co-exist with a Palestinian state. That the Israeli government doesn’t want to allow that is because the government is fascist.

NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io on 09 Aug 05:56 next collapse

That's not true. Zionism is the idea that Jews should build a state for them and only them. It's inherently predicated on ethnically cleansing indigenous people (and oppressing whoever are allowed to remain) to make way for a Jewish and only Jewish society. Here's the so-called father of Zionism on the topic:

As to al-Khalidi concerns about the non-Jewish majority population of Palestine, Herzl replied rhetorically: "who would think of sending them away?" and concluded ambiguously that "If he (the Ottoman Sultan) will not accept it, we will search and, believe me, we will find elsewhere what we need."[c] Rashid Khalidi notes that this sentiment was penned 4 years after Herzl had confided to his diary the idea of spiriting away the population of whatever country was chosen for a future Jewish state to make way for Jews:[49][page needed]

We must expropriate gently the private property on the estates assigned to us. We shall try to spirit the penniless population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries, while denying it employment in our own country The property owners will come over to our side. Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly.'

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_Herzl

The Nakba was not a coincidence. You said that fascism, not Zionism, is the problem, but Zionism is a fascist ideology. Otherwise what do the words "Jewish state" even mean?

mrdown@lemmy.world on 09 Aug 11:50 next collapse

The problem is definitely zionism an ethenic supermasist ideology that can only be compared to the aryan race supermacy. Thst’s why every single israeli prime was a war criminal

Aussieiuszko@aussie.zone on 09 Aug 21:07 collapse

Zionism is 100% the problem. Zionism is a branch of fascism.

No decent person should ever promote ethnostates.

There should be no “Jewish” state, just as there should be no state for any other single culture or religion. That is racism.

HK65@sopuli.xyz on 09 Aug 14:11 next collapse

They armed Hamas in the first place

OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca on 09 Aug 16:00 collapse

And they allowed the Oct 7 attack to happen.

burgerchurgarr@lemmus.org on 09 Aug 14:42 collapse

We want the settler colony to disarm and stop existing, thank you for your attention to this matter.

brucethemoose@lemmy.world on 09 Aug 03:00 next collapse

worried it could be a death sentence for hostages held in Gaza.

I hate to sound insensitive, but even if they get the hostages, this feels like:

<img alt="img" src="https://i.imgflip.com/4mom24.png">

Except somehow even more of a caricature.

WanderingThoughts@europe.pub on 09 Aug 07:42 collapse

Like they even care about hostages. They let the October 7th attack happen, not taking any measures while being warned even by foreign countries. The lives of the hundreds killed that day didn’t really matter. Having a reason for war was the important thing for them.

Saleh@feddit.org on 09 Aug 10:32 collapse

Israel also murdered some of their own civilians as they were dragged back to Gaza, employing the “Hannibal doctrine” that previously was only used to murder their own soldiers to prevent them being taken POW.

gedaliyah@lemmy.world on 09 Aug 11:30 next collapse

Pretty telling that even Netanyahu’s own military experts have said that this is a bad idea and a strategic mistake.

idriss@lemmy.ml on 09 Aug 22:05 collapse

isn’t it clear by now that zionists are the actual terrorists plus genocidal land thieves?

Even if they manage to take full Gaza, what world will they live in after that?

The new holocaust documentaries and books started popping up already. More sophisticated resistance groups are forming.

Ports are empty, airport partially there. US younger generation already disapprove of zionists, they have an economy on life support (free US money).

It will be too expensive to keep this little colonialist project alive forever. When it comes to PR they are done too.

geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml on 09 Aug 23:35 collapse

Europe and America are bankrolling Israel and buying all their genocide weapons and spyware. Next to that a major Israeli export is diamonds (there’s no diamonds in Israel don’t ask where they get them)

As long as all the Arab nations are on a Western leash and don’t fight back, Israel can keep going. Though Yemen has proven fearlessly righteous.