China is building nuclear reactors faster than any other country (www.economist.com)
from naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca to world@lemmy.world on 02 Dec 2023 08:02
https://lemmy.ca/post/10488266

#world

threaded - newest

lovesickoyster@lemmy.world on 02 Dec 2023 08:47 next collapse

also the only one with the balls to build a TMS prototype reactor đŸ’Ș

Deceptichum@kbin.social on 02 Dec 2023 10:15 next collapse

Good to see them building on America's work in prototype molten salt reactors.

lovesickoyster@lemmy.world on 02 Dec 2023 10:23 collapse

exactly, it’s such a shame this research wasn’t continued at the time.

Deceptichum@kbin.social on 02 Dec 2023 10:38 collapse

It wasn’t viable at the time, makes sense they’d focus on exploring other avenues.

Remains to be seen if it’s viable today as well mind you.

lovesickoyster@lemmy.world on 02 Dec 2023 10:51 collapse

It wasn’t viable at the time, makes sense they’d focus on exploring other avenues.

from the very same source you provided:

The broadest and perhaps most important conclusion from the MSRE experience was that a molten salt fueled reactor concept was viable. It ran for considerable periods of time, yielding valuable information, and maintenance was accomplished safely and without excessive delay.

Deceptichum@kbin.social on 02 Dec 2023 10:52 collapse

Viable as in theory it worked.

Not viable as in this makes economic sense to continue with in comparison to other avenues.

Diplomjodler@feddit.de on 02 Dec 2023 10:44 collapse

Yeah, why won’t anybody else flush endless amounts of money down the drain for a white elephant? Must be those pesky environmentalists.

lovesickoyster@lemmy.world on 02 Dec 2023 10:52 collapse

why won’t anybody else flush endless amounts of money down the drain for a white elephant?

wait, are we talking about nuclear fusion?

Diplomjodler@feddit.de on 02 Dec 2023 11:41 collapse

No, molten salt fission reactors. The technology never worked on a commercial scale and it’s doubtful it ever will. And even if somebody were willing to finance the development, it would take decades to become viable.

lovesickoyster@lemmy.world on 02 Dec 2023 11:44 collapse

No, molten salt fission reactors.

your sarcasm detector might be broken.

The technology never worked on a commercial scale and it’s doubtful it ever will.

I guess the chinese think differently - we will see.

Diplomjodler@feddit.de on 02 Dec 2023 13:07 collapse

The Chinese will keep throwing money at it until it maybe works some day. They don’t care about cost.

DrDominate@lemmy.world on 02 Dec 2023 17:47 collapse

More countries should adopt a similar philosophy for ways to end global warming.

Diplomjodler@feddit.de on 03 Dec 2023 15:06 collapse

Sure. But they should use the money for things that have a chance to make a positive impact.

DrDominate@lemmy.world on 03 Dec 2023 22:11 collapse

Like?

Diplomjodler@feddit.de on 03 Dec 2023 22:24 collapse

Have you heard of renewables? Neat stuff.

DrDominate@lemmy.world on 03 Dec 2023 23:55 next collapse

IDK if you know this, but renewables aren’t on their own to cover all of our power needs everywhere.

Diplomjodler@feddit.de on 04 Dec 2023 15:38 collapse

That nonsense has been debunked so many times. And no matter what, it’s simply physically impossible to build enough nukes quickly enough to have a meaningful impact.

DrDominate@lemmy.world on 04 Dec 2023 23:25 collapse

Are we talking about the same thing? I’m talking about nuclear energy not nukes. And if you are talking about nuclear power plants, in what world do you think it’s impossible to build enough to have a meaningful impact? Each power plant produces a crazy amount of energy. Far more than solar and wind can. Solar and wind by themselves will in no way overtake fossil fuel power plants fast enough. Nuclear energy would be a great replacement until then.

Argonne@lemmy.world on 04 Dec 2023 00:20 collapse

It’s not a competition. You can and should do both. Putting all your eggs in renewables is just as shortsighted as not using them

Diplomjodler@feddit.de on 04 Dec 2023 15:40 collapse

We should use the technologies that are proven to work, available today and way way cheaper than anything else.

Argonne@lemmy.world on 05 Dec 2023 19:31 collapse

Yes, and we should continue to develop new technologies and energy systems, you know, the way science and technology progresses. You sound like you would be advocating for steam engines when cars came along

Thrawne@lemmy.world on 02 Dec 2023 09:10 next collapse

Cant wait for the Plainly Difficult videos on those

nous@programming.dev on 02 Dec 2023 09:38 next collapse

Cannot read the full article due to paywall
 but what is up with that tagline:

China is building (fission) nuclear reactors faster than any other country

Can its scientists solve the fusion problem?

What does the fusion problem have to do with fission reactors? They are completely opposite things and fission reactors cannot be converted to fusion ones nor any other way I can see helps with fusion at all
 Like the tag line seems to be heavily implying. I don’t see how these two things are related, and I bet the article does not explain, does it?

Kecessa@sh.itjust.works on 02 Dec 2023 13:42 next collapse

Clicks

weew@lemmy.ca on 02 Dec 2023 17:19 collapse

you see, it’s newkularr

I’m pretty sure that’s as far as the writer’s physics education went.

Redex68@lemmy.world on 02 Dec 2023 10:07 next collapse

I just hope they’re not rushing too much like the Soviets, and we get another Chernobyl

Argonne@lemmy.world on 04 Dec 2023 00:18 collapse

As long as they are not using the old dumb Soviet design then it’s literally impossible. The amount of Nuclear fear mongering is insane

Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone on 02 Dec 2023 10:09 next collapse

I see a lot of chinese made machinery that doesn’t meet Australian standards and are often built so poorly they don’t last.

I hope the people building these have better quality control.

Diplomjodler@feddit.de on 02 Dec 2023 10:42 next collapse

Oh but of course! What could possibly go wrong?

nous@programming.dev on 02 Dec 2023 11:49 next collapse

Chinese manufacturers are quite flexible on pricing and quality - all the stuff is not the cheapest lowest quality stuff. One big problem they have though is that a lot of companies that farm out manufacturing to china do it to lower costs - and so opt for the cheapest things they can, then wonder why what they get back is a pile of crap and sell it on anyway.

If you are willing to pay more then the quality can actually be very good. At lot of things things you think of as good quality are still made in china or at least parts of it are.

azertyfun@sh.itjust.works on 02 Dec 2023 14:14 collapse

I don’t worry about Chinese manufacturing capabilities
 they’re doing great.

I do worry greatly about the Chinese political system causing preventable (nuclear) accidents through lack of transparency and accountability.
If their reaction to the COVID breakout is symptomatic of systemic issues (I firmly believe it is), then I don’t see how anyone can trust the Chinese government to act in the interest of safety.

Those micro-cracks and corrosion issues that caused months of downtime on Belgian and French reactors respectively, that would have caused rolling blackouts in both instances if those winters had been cold? Pretty sure in China that’d be “carry on comrade”.

EDIT: Oh and I forgot about the 3 gorges dam. In case anyone still doubts that the Chinese government does not factor in safety, at all.

gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works on 02 Dec 2023 15:42 collapse

Mainland China still struggles with ultra-high precision engineering to this day. They still can’t make a turbofan engine that matches the efficiency and power/weight ratio of either Russian or Western designs, despite the fact that many of their “indigenous” designs are simply reverse-engineered copies. Hell, they only recently started successfully mass-producing good-quality ballpoint pens (which are actually deceptively difficult to manufacture at scale).

Edit: Not to mention, trying to capture and use at least some of Taiwan’s semiconductor foundries is very definitely one of the unstated justifications they have for claiming sovereignty over Taiwan, and for making plans to invade and fully subjugate the island.

Considering that the CCP seems to lean HARD into the Soviet idea of saving face at all costs just to try to look good, I would not be terribly surprised if some sort of Chernobyl- thing happens at some point, because that’s the exact mentality that led to Chernobyl and the RBMK reactor design becoming a problem in the first place.

tpihkal@lemmy.world on 02 Dec 2023 13:39 next collapse

Tofu dreg nuclear reactors. I did not have that on my Bingo card.

4am@lemm.ee on 02 Dec 2023 14:08 next collapse

Ahh, this old chestnut.

It’s because the people importing the cheap Chinese stuff are importing cheap stuff from China because they want to make as much profit as possible. China’s been the world’s factory for 50 years now, don’t think they haven’t figured out how to do things on their own?

FFS almost their whole population was lifted out of poverty and were racing them to have the best chip manufacturing process. They have a space station.

Turns out there is a long-term effect to giving all your factory tech and IP to another country: it becomes institutional knowledge, and eventually they start seeing improvements on their own, and they garner enough expertise to not only strike out on their own but compete.

The capitalists sold your future for yachts. Like, literally.

stevehobbes@lemmy.world on 03 Dec 2023 15:59 collapse

I mean yes, they’ve stolen a lot of IP. Much of it was not transferred legally. They have a state run industrial and commercial spying program and have for decades - just like Russia.

What OP is actually referring to is the lack of industrial oversight and the Chinese penchant for using substandard material like steel and lying about it to charge a higher price while providing an inferior good.

Look up ‘tofu dreg’ construction.

It’s not western capitalists getting rich off this, it’s unscrupulous Chinese factory owners and industry magnates.

It’s also not just an export problem.

idunnololz@lemmy.world on 04 Dec 2023 00:13 collapse

And also corruption. It’s so rampant in China. So even if there are laws or standards, they can be ineffective due to bribery.

dgmib@lemmy.world on 03 Dec 2023 01:04 collapse

Even if it built with the same disregard as the Chernobyl plant, and there’s “an occasional meltdown”
 it’s still actually better than building coal power plant in terms of lives lost per TWh of power generated.

Deceptichum@kbin.social on 02 Dec 2023 10:17 next collapse

Nuclear is not the future. Investment should be in green energies only, there is no point in repeating the mistakes of the past.

Lumilias@pawb.social on 02 Dec 2023 12:55 collapse

Nuclear is a good middle step to full renewable, it’s not the end goal. There’s not enough storage capacity right now for energy usage at night, which is where nuclear can fill the gap until efficient energy storage can be achieved.

notapantsday@feddit.de on 02 Dec 2023 13:19 next collapse

I wonder what kind of storage solutions we could have today if we were investing as much into it as into nuclear fusion and fission


Lumilias@pawb.social on 02 Dec 2023 13:26 collapse

There is a lot of investment in energy storage solutions. Everyone knows how critically important energy storage is for our climate change present and future, and whoever develops the best and most scalable solution first will make billions of dollars.

Nuclear fission doesn’t get that much investment afaik due to overblown radiation fears, while safe cold fusion is the real end goal of energy generation and deserves more investment than it gets now.

JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz on 02 Dec 2023 13:37 collapse

Uh I read somewhere that “cold fusion” was just an error in the simulations/calculations

Lumilias@pawb.social on 02 Dec 2023 17:02 collapse

Got a source? I’m genuinely curious about that, since I know cold fusion has been long considered the holy grail of energy generation. I just want to hope that it isn’t mere science fiction now :(

Deceptichum@kbin.social on 02 Dec 2023 13:54 collapse

Mate?

Nuclear takes forever to build, we could pump out a million storage solutions before enough nuclear was built.

Nuclear is the complete opposite of a middle ground.

Lumilias@pawb.social on 02 Dec 2023 16:58 next collapse

China built 37 of them in the last 10 years according to the article. It doesn’t take forever, it just takes foresight and planning, which most of the Western world lacks beyond the next quarter profits lol.

The baseline capacity nuclear provides can get evolving countries like China out of the fossil fuel phase, which is critically important. I don’t know what your problem is with nuclear, it’s been a relatively safe and stable form of energy generation that’s far better than any fossil fuel.

Edit: and I just read the top comment in the thread that they’re building a fuckton of coal plants too. Damn it.

feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world on 02 Dec 2023 18:24 next collapse

What storage solution are you thinking of.

ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world on 02 Dec 2023 23:52 collapse

Nuclear is 100% the future. It provides the highest energy density (i.e. it produces the most kwh/square mile), and is also the safest and most environmentally friendly form of power generation we have right now. The downside is the amount of time it takes to bring reactors online. Make no mistake, the time cost is a feature, not a bug. There are phenomenally stringent requirements and QC checks that must be met in order to ensure public and environmental safety. However, this also means that nuclear is not the solution right now. What we should be doing is constructing wind, solar, tidal, etc. plants to transition away from fossil fuels in the immediate future, while simultaneously beginning construction on nuclear plants, so we can eventually transition to those.

Hugohase@kbin.social on 02 Dec 2023 12:17 next collapse

I guess i'd rather have them waste their money on low CO2 nuclear than on coal. But in reality, I would like them to not waste their money (and time) and build renewables.

4am@lemm.ee on 02 Dec 2023 13:40 next collapse
supercritical@lemmy.world on 02 Dec 2023 18:55 collapse

Luke warm take from someone who didn’t even think to search the internet for 1 microsecond.

Mamertine@lemmy.world on 02 Dec 2023 13:51 next collapse

Yesterday there was literally an article about how China was building more coal power plants than anyone else.

They’ve got a lot of people and need a huge amount of electricity.

Edit: here it is

reuters.com/
/chinas-coal-country-full-steam-ahea


YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world on 02 Dec 2023 13:58 next collapse

If built to Chinese standards they will melt down within a decade.

HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club on 02 Dec 2023 15:25 collapse

Knowing something behind this, China bought a version of the nuclear power plant that the US built in Georgia. However, instead of only building four plants, they’ve added a few zeros to that number. So they have a Western engineered and construction tested design that they are cloning all over the place, driving down price.

They might fuck up on construction material supply chains, but they are at least implementing the strategy for cheap nuclear power.

magikmw@lemm.ee on 02 Dec 2023 18:11 next collapse

I’m sure this wont backfire in the future.

winky88@startrek.website on 04 Dec 2023 00:37 collapse

No you see, it’s backfire to the future.

Cyberjin@lemmy.world on 03 Dec 2023 01:04 next collapse

Nuclear reactors Tofu dreg edition.

The problem with China is that they are okay with bad standards and bad safety. Also corruption and lies are a thing in China.

When Fukushima got the yes to put the water in ocean, China was screaming and fear mongering Even though they put tons of waste in the ocean without any precautions.

I don’t trust them to do it right way because they are short-sighted.

mlg@lemmy.world on 04 Dec 2023 00:00 collapse

ITT: People who forgot China has been a nuclear power for 6 decades and has run nuclear plants fine ever since