Gennady Zyuganov [chairman of Communist Party of the Russian Federation] warns of the risk of a revolution in Russia as early as this fall
(ua.news)
from antonim@lemmy.world to world@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 17:53
https://lemmy.world/post/45942722
from antonim@lemmy.world to world@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 17:53
https://lemmy.world/post/45942722
According to him, the country’s economy “hit rock bottom” in the first quarter, which could lead to a crisis.
Zyuganov also suggested that the situation this fall could resemble the events of 1917, when the communists came to power.
Video with English subtitles available here: bsky.app/profile/…/3mk3d7tu6m22v
#world
threaded - newest
lol
A communist coup in Moscow would be a bit on the nose, but I’d allow it
Ill pencil it in for early October
Julian or Gregorian calendar? I want to get this right this time
Let’s go with Julian, and if not enough people show up that day we’ll go Full Greg.
It’s not like last time where the Russian empire is caught up in a war of attrition in Eastern Europe… oh wait.
“He emphasized that such a scenario must not be allowed to happen.”
Controlled opposition.
MLs are always controlled opposition (and always have been), just look at how quickly they team up with capitalists to take out any real socialists.
MLs = Marxist-Leninist?
Yup
Haha I’d never heard that take before. I’m curious about two things. 1) How do you define MLs? 2) What would real socialism entail? I’m guessing with those answers I should have a good idea what you’re talking about.
Anyone who self-identifies as an ML, such as the part mentioned: en.wikipedia.org/…/Communist_Party_of_the_Russian…
Workers being in control of the means of production, like actually not in some “the party represents the workers BS”.
…such as?
Spain, Korea, Ukraine, the Soviets.
Any attempt at putting the workers in charge instead of the state is met with violence.
It’s not controlled in the sense that capitalist control them, it’s just controlled in the sense that the state requires private property & structurally state-capitalism is closer to liberal-capitalism, so you get less pushback from the cops, bureaucrats, bosses & other assorted middle managers that still get to live off labor of the workers.
mrw
<img alt="" src="https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.masterandmargarita.eu%2Fimages%2F09context%2Fvladimirlenin.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=323149bb4982d7328a12aadcc161b8ff222ccb94689fdd2d13500ad5bfdec4e7">
Sounds to me more like a nudge nudge, wink wink sentence to avoid 25 years of prison in Siberia.
Maybe, but I don’t think that the conditions are nearly as bad as they were in 1917. They’re obviously worse than they would have been had Russia not entered into the war, but the collapse in 1917 was due to urban food shortages. I don’t mean “luxury X is unavailable”, but that people couldn’t get staple food to survive because of demands of the war.
smithsonianmag.com/…/russias-february-revolution-…
www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/ztyk87h/revision/5
Now, okay. It’s possible that standards for political support are different, that the bar has changed. But the public in Russia of 2026 — though it may be in a worse state than Russia of 2020 due to resources consumed by the war — is also not experiencing the degree of deprivation of Russia of 2017.
This is consistently true of most revolutions. Once a lot of people are staring at the possibility of starvation you hit critical mass on people with nothing to lose.
That is definitely true, but 21st century examples of revolution don’t necessarily need a food shortage to begin (Maidan, Nepal, etc.)
I’m no historian but I think self-determination is up there with starvation as a common cause for revolt. But Russians wouldn’t be throwing off the shackles of a foreign empire.
It’s true. Looking back on revolutions, starvation is a common cause. What we haven’t seen is a relatively better off population revolt because their conditions got notably worse, from pretty good to pretty bad but not close to starvation.
Simpsons did it
<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/15797826-3af0-4416-aebc-055ecb3dfaaa.gif">
Isn’t it, like, his job to make this happen?
I’m pretty sure any real communists in Russia would be brutally repressed.
It’d be nice is Russia can take back itself from that dick-tater… Get rid of all of Putin’s ilk, elect a decent person as president., power wash the stench away, peace talks with their neighbors, condemnation of the US Pedo Party. All that good stuff.
Highly doubt it will happen.
Damn, I want that for the US!
Take it back to what, though? The 1990s? I guess that’d be an improvement. What they really need is progress. Is there any kind of progressive movement in Russia?
dumb garbage
We’re gonna see that in the US before we see it in Russia. At least Russians have free education and free healthcare mandated by their constitution.
Oh, soviet union 2. Now with more soviets.
Soviet Union 2: Electric Bogaloo.
Electric Gulag-loo
Right after the November elections. Hold out just a little longer guys and you will get your pound of flesh. We hit them all at the same time.
Isn’t that party in Russia super pro-government? Essentially controlled oposition?
New boss is the old boss.
“we won the revolution!
now get back to work!”
Mmm … no. No, they just don’t do that sort of thing in Russia.