Panic among Moscow’s Elite As Putin Moves to Seize Tycoon’s Empire (kyivinsider.com)
from bytesonbike@discuss.online to world@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 15:25
https://discuss.online/post/23169919

Vladimir Putin’s government has launched an aggressive campaign to nationalize the assets of Konstantin Strukov, one of Russia’s richest men and the owner of the country’s largest gold mining company. The move marks a sharp escalation in the Kremlin’s efforts to extract wealth from within its own elite as the financial toll of the war in Ukraine deepens.

Strukov, whose fortune is estimated at over $3.5 billion, is the founder of Yuzhuralzoloto—a gold empire built over decades with strong ties to the Kremlin. But on July 5, his private jet was grounded by Russian authorities as it prepared to leave for Turkey. His passport was reportedly seized, and the aircraft barred from departing.

#world

threaded - newest

bytesonbike@discuss.online on 07 Jul 15:26 next collapse

Billionaires siding with dictators thinking they’ll be protected?

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works on 07 Jul 15:51 next collapse

It’s funny to me that they think they’ll be special, every single time. “They won’t throw me out the window for my fortune!”

Nougat@fedia.io on 07 Jul 15:59 next collapse

Leopards Throwing Out Of Windows Party

ChicoSuave@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 20:24 next collapse

Window Inspectors Against Workplace Safety party

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 08 Jul 03:02 collapse

defenestration

Saleh@feddit.org on 07 Jul 19:16 collapse

Well, in the case of Nazi Germany it worked spectacularly well. Many of Germanys most rich people are inheritors to industrial fortunes that got unimaginably rich with selling weapons to the Nazi army and using forced labor from the concentration camps. The families Quandt/Klatten (BMW) and Porsche/Piech (Porsche,VW, Audi…) come to mind directly. The Krupps are also still in the game although they have gambled a lot of money away over the past decades

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works on 07 Jul 19:21 next collapse

Hitler didn’t stay in power long enough to take everything though. (my bad, it was longer than I thought). Also, they probably toed the line and didn’t piss him off so they could make lots of money. They weren’t special either.

NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip on 08 Jul 01:26 next collapse

It is worth mentioning that in the case of krupps they made a lot of money selling arms in WWI and they purchased newspapers to sell the war to increase profits.

Own all the newspapers… Propaganda… Seems familiar.

anomnom@sh.itjust.works on 08 Jul 12:43 collapse

They made a good coffee grinder though. We’re still running our’s from the early 90s.

boonhet@sopuli.xyz on 08 Jul 07:57 collapse

Never ask Mr. Kühne where his family’s fortune came from, or what their most popular cargo was in the 40s.

atzanteol@sh.itjust.works on 07 Jul 15:58 next collapse

Usually they are. Dictators typically gain and keep power by appeasing the wealthy and powerful.

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works on 07 Jul 16:50 next collapse

Not keep power, just to get it. Then they dump them once they’ve got it. See Giuliani, Musk, My Pillow guy, Herman Cain, etc.

atzanteol@sh.itjust.works on 07 Jul 18:47 collapse

I mean… No - to keep it. “No man rules alone.” They need key supporters. However simply “being rich” is not enough.

Danquebec@sh.itjust.works on 10 Jul 01:13 collapse

I believe Putin is between a rock and a hard place and has to take risks. There could be a coup from this. Perhaps more decentralization of force as rich people look to protect their assets and hire private mercenaries or buy the loyalty of military officers.

dangling_cat@piefed.blahaj.zone on 07 Jul 16:38 next collapse

Nah. They all play this game; they all know the risk. It’s all about gaining leverage and the correct alignment at the right time.

He probably knows it’s happening and sacrifices himself for his family and assets.

mgnome@piefed.social on 07 Jul 20:07 next collapse

Some folks became billionaires in Russia simply because they were friends of Putin though.

These may truly be protected class. Everyone else though - out the window as soon as they outlive their usefulness.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 08 Jul 03:03 collapse

russian oligarchs are only useful as a personal piggy bank for putin, he distributes the wealth around and then siezes it back down the line.

gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works on 08 Jul 16:45 collapse

I genuinely cannot wait until Thiel gets his comeuppance, one way or the other.

newthrowaway20@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 15:39 next collapse

The USA elite should take notice. It’ll happen to them too. Trump will ruin them if things get between himself and them.

eldavi@lemmy.ml on 07 Jul 15:45 next collapse

it’s so much better when you take from the rich, rather than taking from the poor like we do in the united states.

NOT_RICK@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 15:52 next collapse

They take from the poor in Russia too though. The rich aren’t the ones being fed into the meat grinder in Ukraine.

eldavi@lemmy.ml on 07 Jul 15:54 next collapse

the difference is that the united states ONLY takes from the poor, while the russians take from both rich AND poor.

Eldritch@piefed.social on 07 Jul 16:11 next collapse

Trust me the US will start taking from wealthy Americans as well soon enough. Once authoritarian groups burn enough Bridges and goodwill. They always have to scapegoat another group.

It's pretty hilarious how so many people think that the boot isn't the problem. The flavor of it is all that matters.

TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 17:17 next collapse

Call me crazy, but people might take ML users stand against fascism more seriously if they did literally anything with it besides just rooting for a different Imperial kleptocracy built on violence.

eldavi@lemmy.ml on 07 Jul 17:24 collapse

the only thing that’s crazy is westerners refusing to learn from the large body of independent evidence that defines marxists/leninists in a similar manner that climate deniers refuse to learn from the large body of climate science evidence.

TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 17:41 next collapse

Defending a violent, Imperial, kleptoctacy is not Marxism. Lying about how you are being criticized is not a genius plan to avoid the consequences of what you said. Can you communicate in anything other than buzz words or am I talking to a chat bot?

eldavi@lemmy.ml on 07 Jul 19:12 collapse

That’s not what I said.

I would recommend that you reread the comment before it gets deleted by the liberal mods in this community; but I already know that your ilk doesn’t respond well to reality.

Eldritch@piefed.social on 07 Jul 19:40 collapse

Are, are the liberals in the room there with you? Roll your forehead across the keyboard if so. Seriously though. It's laughable looking at the levels of cognitive dissonance shared between people making arguments like yours and the maga crowd.

TachyonTele@piefed.social on 07 Jul 18:00 next collapse

How do you not get exhausted from being so incredibly wrong all the time?

eldavi@lemmy.ml on 07 Jul 19:07 collapse

I’m powered by the fact that liberals like you get it wrong SIGNIFICANTLY more often. Lol

TachyonTele@piefed.social on 07 Jul 20:25 collapse

Do other people get it wrong when you don't speak? Is that how it works?
So far everytime you you open your mouth you're wrong, so i I'm curious what 'significantly' means to you.

forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org on 08 Jul 03:15 collapse

Did you have a stroke writing this??? Wtf

Buelldozer@lemmy.today on 07 Jul 18:11 collapse

the difference is that the united states ONLY takes from the poor

Objectively and provably untrue.

eldavi@lemmy.ml on 07 Jul 19:10 collapse

Takes as in seizes; nevertheless I admire how you twisted to the point to better comport w your world view. Lol

Buelldozer@lemmy.today on 08 Jul 14:46 collapse

Takes as in seizes

I think you’ve forgotten that the means of production is supposed to be seized by the proletariat, not by the bourgeoisie using their illegitimate government.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 08 Jul 03:05 collapse

specifically the poors of ethnic russians, not the white ones from moscow and st petersberg.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 08 Jul 03:04 collapse

putin is a trillionaire just reclaiming his ill gotten gains from his oligarchs.

ShadowRam@fedia.io on 07 Jul 16:17 next collapse

Trump Admin using national security as a pre-tense to take control over X/Twitter away from Musk, and effectively killing it in favour of Truth Social

jaybone@lemmy.zip on 07 Jul 23:06 collapse

If Trump takes Facebook from Zuck i will lmfao and simultaneously weep for humanity.

PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 17:03 collapse

It’s all ready happening between him and Musk unless that’s all kayfabe

bytesonbike@discuss.online on 07 Jul 22:39 next collapse

I’m really excited for Zuckerfuck to get Trump’d. Unlike Musk, he’ll do it in the most pathetic way… Raging like a little nerd by writing private temper tantrum emails and everyone in his circle comforts him because he pays them 7-figures.

jaybone@lemmy.zip on 07 Jul 23:03 collapse

Tbf, musk’s way is also pretty pathetic.

jaybone@lemmy.zip on 07 Jul 23:01 next collapse

You mean covfefe?

Olhonestjim@lemmy.world on 08 Jul 03:32 collapse

Neither of them has the chops to pull off such an act. They’re genuinely horrible idiots.

MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 15:42 next collapse

Conversely, if Putin falls out a window, maybe they can keep their business.

Regna@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 16:16 next collapse

Please. There are hundreds ready to take Putins place. Some politically, but hundreds behind the scenes who also have finger puppets ready for ”power” who can step in for both Medvedev and Putin. The rest of the dog kennel (like Lavrov) will keep barking for their masters sake.

MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 16:20 next collapse

Please. There are hundreds ready to take Putins place. Some politically, but hundreds behind the scenes who also have finger puppets ready for ”power” who can step in for both Medvedev and Putin. The rest of the dog kennel (like Lavrov) will keep barking for their masters sake.

It sure sounds like you’re advocating staying meek and submissive in the face of Tyranny.

Regna@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 16:23 collapse

I guess you didn’t really read. Just pointing out that you need to do more than kill the puppetmaster to replace all those who he either trained or who learned how to thrive in his absence.

MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 16:36 collapse

I guess you didn’t really read. Just pointing out that you need to do more than kill the puppetmaster to replace all those who he either trained or who learned how to thrive in his absence.

I guess you didn’t really understand my comment.

You’d have to be a complete knuckehead to think that the point of killing a Tyrant is to have one of their trainees take over.

Regna@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 18:12 collapse

Maybe I should clarify: Oh you spring child who knows nothing of the year, how it turns and how winter turns planted hopes into frozen fears.

Pre-edit: You’re right. Which is why Putin’s death won’t bring much boon. Staying silent, quiet or passive won’t bring much in opposition to the face of tyranny either. But eliminating the current tyranny will be more difficult than what the people tried to accomplish over a hundred years ago, as the dissemination of power is different nowadays. Before, one used to think that cutting the head of a hydra might be difficult, but possible in the long run. Today, well…

MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 18:32 collapse

You’re right. Which is why Putin’s death won’t bring much boon. Staying silent, quiet or passive won’t bring much in opposition to the face of tyranny either. But eliminating the current tyranny will be more difficult than what the people tried to accomplish over a hundred years ago, as the dissemination of power is different nowadays. Before, one used to think that cutting the head of a hydra might be difficult, but possible in the long run. Today, well…

The more you talk, the more you sound like you’re following marching orders:

Drive home the point that resistance is futile.

nesc@lemmy.cafe on 08 Jul 08:43 collapse

Let them fight lol, also medvedev has zero chances of becoming anything but bootlicker for his new master.

Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 17:01 next collapse

They’re scared they’ll go down with him. But they’ll finally have to accept the fact that they’re fucked either way. At this point, getting rid of him is their best chance.

MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 17:43 collapse

They’re scared they’ll go down with him. But they’ll finally have to accept the fact that they’re fucked either way. At this point, getting rid of him is their best chance.

Yup. They’re at the point where the consequences of obedience are as bad as defiance.

Best have him fall out a window and see if prospects change.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 08 Jul 03:07 collapse

putin is paranoid enough not to go any windows, he often only ventures from his PALACES under fsb protection to a room where he has 20m table away from his inner circle.

Olhonestjim@lemmy.world on 08 Jul 03:32 next collapse

His guilded prison.

MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world on 08 Jul 13:32 collapse

Must be nice for him to have absolute guaranteed loyalty from every human that he’s required to interact with on a daily basis.

Wazowski@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 15:53 next collapse

that cunt Zuckerberg should pay attention.

makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml on 07 Jul 19:15 next collapse

Your comment will probably get removed. So for this sweet moment. I agree.

Eldritch@piefed.social on 07 Jul 19:45 collapse

It's not a threat to someone's health or life. Simply pointing out that he's a fool to think that similar groups wouldn't turn on him if they wanted to. All gung ho to try and join them. I think the comment is safe.

makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml on 07 Jul 20:34 collapse

The reddit still echo’s in my head. Although not totally safe here, the past trauma is real.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 08 Jul 03:16 collapse

hes an android, so he is incapable of fear or disgust. also FACEBOOK still promotes right wing/russian propaganda, so hes on good terms with trump.

ddplf@szmer.info on 07 Jul 16:00 next collapse

It’s funny because $3.5bln is nothing when trying to cover the war effort, but it’ll spark a massive distrust in the Kremlin’s inner circle, which is basically the only group of people that can realistically threaten Putin’s very life.

Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 16:52 collapse

I’m still waiting for these fuckers to finally grow some balls.

TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 17:39 collapse

Nah. Russia will implode itself on its own even without resistance. As if Russia never learned anything that autocratic control over economy never works, because their political culture is too corrupt to function effectively.

Francis Fukuyama, as wrong as he was about the end of history, is still correct that dictatorships eventually collapse because they surround themselves with yes men who are too detached from reality. The invasion of Ukraine is the beginning of the end for Putin. It is only a matter of time.

altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 07 Jul 18:04 collapse

the beginning of the end for Putin. It is only a matter of time.

With his age, he has all biological means to fuck around and never find out. I believe the legacy talk captures him, but the fact he himself would never meet any pushback makes many of his decisions way easier than if he was 40yo and had another 40+ to his rule. Any other minute of him fucking up foreign countries with a weaponised influence, not to say direct warfare, is a minute too much.

He could’ve tried to revive the country, and he got an easy start in the 00s, but he chosed to gamble it instead.

mgnome@piefed.social on 07 Jul 20:20 next collapse

He could've tried to revive the country, and he got an easy start in the 00s, but he chosed to gamble it instead.

That's not why people become dictators. Not to mention that in autocratic environments heads of states don't really feel the consequences of their actions, and don't really mind throwing millions of their own people under the bus to bring some ephemeral former glory back.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 08 Jul 03:14 collapse

early on the war, and probably now he looked like he was on corticosteroids because of the moon face in many photos, hes probably hiding some health condition,.

HubertManne@piefed.social on 07 Jul 17:24 next collapse

This is a pretty good example of why I say even millinoaires and billionaires should support a functional democractic society with taxation and regulation and social safety nets. Its the old penny wise and pound foolish. Getting a sliver more and a sliver more and then you lose it all because the rule of law was thrown out long ago. It won't necessarily take that long to. At a certain point it could happen at any time. Maybe it will. Maybe it won't.

burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 18:16 next collapse

a functional democratic society would not have billionaires and hopefully millionaires neither

Tiger666@lemmy.ca on 07 Jul 18:41 collapse

A functional society doesn’t need money.

Olhonestjim@lemmy.world on 08 Jul 03:29 collapse

Money implies poverty.

SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 18:20 next collapse

This all depends on the people born into wealth being reasonable people.

Most are unhinged psychopaths or nepo babies with too much ego.

Which is why wealth needs to be forcefully redistributed, they won’t do it voluntarily.

Triasha@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 23:44 collapse

Wealth is actually being redistributed quite a bit in Russia right now. The oligarchs are paying for the war and “the people” are getting much higher wages either in the military or because of labor shortages.

It’s not great, what with all the death and destruction. But Russians gini coefficient is going down fast.

HailSeitan@lemmy.world on 08 Jul 02:49 next collapse

Hamilton Nolan has made a similar argument

driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br on 08 Jul 03:46 next collapse

Or you end being shoot on the street and the entire world celebrates it.

grrgyle@slrpnk.net on 08 Jul 10:03 collapse

That was a fun day

avidamoeba@lemmy.ca on 08 Jul 06:55 next collapse

Smaller scale millionaires perhaps. Once they go multinational, it becomes very difficult to significantly harm them even if one country decides to dispossess their business. This has already happened to large corporations that exist today through nationalization at various places and points in time. E.g. Shell after Venezuelan oil nationalization.

MrMakabar@slrpnk.net on 08 Jul 08:02 next collapse

That requires rule of law to actually work. Putin is well known to murder problematic oligarchs. Combined with some proper blackmail, that tends to work very well.

HubertManne@piefed.social on 08 Jul 13:38 next collapse

Not if its the home nation. Shell was a us company in venezuela but if the same thing happened in the US the owners would be lucky to get out of the country with what they could carry and if they worked fast enough maybe they could have a small fraction of what they used to.

avidamoeba@lemmy.ca on 08 Jul 14:34 collapse

Yes, of course.

calcopiritus@lemmy.world on 08 Jul 13:49 collapse

A billionaire cannot exist in 2 countries at the same time. It doesn’t matter if his company is multinational, he isn’t.

If you jail that billionaire, which is not hard as a state if said billionaire resides in your country, you can “convince” him to give even assets in foreign countries.

That’s why they removed his passport.

avidamoeba@lemmy.ca on 08 Jul 14:32 collapse

Right but how do you make most countries want to arrest them? We currently don’t have a setup allowing for this if no international criminal offenses are involved. It only happens if the billionaire resides mostly in an “authoritarian” country where they could get “arbitrarily” arrested. The rest of the world isn’t currently setup to do this. I’m not saying it can’t be setup or shouldn’t be setup like that.

calcopiritus@lemmy.world on 08 Jul 16:16 collapse

The comment you replied to originally was talking about why billionaires should support a democratic society.

If the society is not democratic, it would be authoritarian. Therefore what I explained could happen.

avidamoeba@lemmy.ca on 08 Jul 18:22 collapse

Yes. Of course what you said could happen. My point is that in the current status quo there’s still plenty of non-authoritarian countries and billionaires are still operating on easy-to-jump-ship basis when they destroy one democracy or another for increased profit. So I think that’s why this cost isn’t factored in. Competition for increased profits dominates. If we’re left with only a few democracies that tolerate billionaires, then that calculus could change. It’s similar to capitalism’s treatment of any finite resource - plunder that bitch till there’s nothing left, then deal with the consequences. If we don’t, the other guy would do it and we’d lose on the profit, and the other guy gains power over us given by the newly acquired capital.

vivalapivo@lemmy.today on 08 Jul 07:30 collapse

Rich people live under the fear of losing it all. As sharing is synonymous with losing to them, no one wants it and everyone is caught in this loop.

grrgyle@slrpnk.net on 08 Jul 10:02 collapse

I’m becoming convinced it’s an actual mental disease, or at least grossly maladaptive

vivalapivo@lemmy.today on 08 Jul 10:30 collapse

It’s a mental disease in the same sense as drapetomania used to be

grrgyle@slrpnk.net on 08 Jul 11:25 collapse

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drapetomania

Drapetomania was a proposed mental illness that […] hypothesized as the cause of enslaved Americans fleeing captivity.

I could make some guesses, but I’m not sure what you meant by this. What did you mean?

vivalapivo@lemmy.today on 08 Jul 13:09 collapse

Some adaptation pretty human mechanism which looks unnatural because it’s not us who experience it although given the same circumstances we would do the same

grrgyle@slrpnk.net on 08 Jul 15:27 collapse

I see right, yeah, it’s the conditions social and material that give rise to the “disorder” whereas if we fix the conditions, it just evaporates. Like abolishing slavery or private property.

vivalapivo@lemmy.today on 08 Jul 15:39 collapse

Exactly like that 💯

pawnfuture@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 17:46 next collapse

This is the oligarchy that American technocrats want to recreate at home. Owning things is dependent on being alive. Maybe paying a couple percent extra on taxes is worth it.

samus12345@sh.itjust.works on 07 Jul 18:15 next collapse

Somebody give Trump the idea to do this to Musk.

jaybone@lemmy.zip on 07 Jul 23:19 collapse

I think somebody just did.

Rentlar@lemmy.ca on 07 Jul 19:47 next collapse

If you nationalize your industry, you should be doing it to reform and re-gear it to support your country.

Clearly, Putin here is not interested in making it good for the country, but that his petty war has him cash-strapped and needs to forcibly ‘borrow’ his billionaire friends’ assets.

some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org on 07 Jul 19:47 next collapse

Strukov’s company has denied the incident entirely, stating that he was in Moscow on the day in question and calling the reports “disinformation.” But court documents confirm that a judge had already banned him and his family from leaving the country, and government agencies moved quickly to enforce it.

I will now recommend the Sad Oligarch podcast. Short series on the mysterious deaths of Russian oligarchs in the last few years.

AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net on 08 Jul 02:13 next collapse

A friend of a friend is the daughter of a Russian oligarch. It was a messy situation in which she was at risk of being drawn into the politics, even though her dad was an asshole who she would’ve been glad to see defenestrated. I only know the surface level info, but it sounds like a fucked up situation in many ways

some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org on 08 Jul 13:12 collapse

Hadn’t considered people born into the crosshairs like that. Cheers.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 08 Jul 03:10 collapse

defenestration podcast.

some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org on 08 Jul 13:12 collapse

That’s the scientific name, yes.

hansolo@lemmy.today on 07 Jul 20:00 next collapse

Ooooh, gringo broligarchs, cast your eyes upon all the fucks left to give, and see that $Trump wallet may also be empty.

McDropout@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 23:28 next collapse

It’s giving Elon-Trump vibes

WiseScorpio@lemmy.world on 07 Jul 23:52 next collapse

Strukov is about to suffer the effects of defenestration.

breecher@sh.itjust.works on 08 Jul 07:11 collapse

Only four days since the last Russian oligarch defenestration.

gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de on 08 Jul 15:24 collapse

is the defenestration supposed to be a metaphor for something? i.e., they took too many risks and “leaned out the window too far and fell over” or sth 🤔

Bravo@eviltoast.org on 08 Jul 17:50 collapse

At this point it’s just a signature calling card. Like the Wet Bandits leaving all the taps running. Ensuring that everybody knows who did it, without officially claiming responsibility, is intended as a power move to remind everyone that Comrade Major is always listening so toe the line

oppy1984@lemdro.id on 08 Jul 02:56 next collapse

Somebody didn’t watch Rules for Rulers, keep your elite happy or they’ll come together and turn on you.

Fingers crossed.

avidamoeba@lemmy.ca on 08 Jul 06:40 next collapse

Not if you have a loyal, competent police apparatus to round up anyone who dares to step out of line.

oppy1984@lemdro.id on 09 Jul 13:28 collapse

Apparently the FSB is the opposite of the army since he’s still in power.

thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works on 08 Jul 07:12 collapse

You remember those old “In Soviet Russia” backwards jokes? It’s like that, but unironically.

Putin has consolidated power to the point that he doesn’t serve at the behest of Russian billionaires; they only exist due to his whims - and they can cease to exist just as quickly.

‘Blowout’ by Rachel Maddow touches on this, it’s an interesting read/listen.

Nighed@feddit.uk on 08 Jul 13:05 collapse

They are refering to a YouTube video I think.

TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip on 08 Jul 13:50 collapse

Which references this book: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dictator's_Handbook

Nighed@feddit.uk on 08 Jul 14:44 collapse

Huh, til

finitebanjo@lemmy.world on 08 Jul 03:54 next collapse

And let this be a lesson to US Billionaires.

Tryenjer@lemmy.world on 08 Jul 10:33 collapse

If most of them are as smart and lucid as Musk, they won’t learn anything.

US billionaires think they can control Trump, and that’s very likely true. The worst is yet to come for these rich guys when someone who can truly reverse the power dynamics and thus rule them with an iron fist, as well as the common people, takes the throne.

finitebanjo@lemmy.world on 08 Jul 12:08 collapse

Trump cannot be controlled, everything is purely transactional with him. The moment he gains more from taking businesses by force, thats what he will do.

Trust and deals have no meaning to him. This is a theif without honor.

JcbAzPx@lemmy.world on 08 Jul 17:07 collapse

He can be controlled for as long as you have access. He bends to the will of the nearest person like a weed blowing in the wind.

finitebanjo@lemmy.world on 08 Jul 18:31 collapse

We should treat him like the threat that he is,an absolute unchecked tyrant.

doo@sh.itjust.works on 08 Jul 06:34 next collapse

What a great way to show the inefficiency of sanctions! /s

jaupsinluggies@feddit.uk on 08 Jul 07:33 next collapse

He’ll soon be struck off.

[deleted] on 08 Jul 12:51 collapse
.
arc99@lemmy.world on 08 Jul 08:17 next collapse

Soon these oligarchs won’t even own a window to jump out of

Tja@programming.dev on 08 Jul 13:55 next collapse

The government will provide one, they are generous like that.

Blackmist@feddit.uk on 08 Jul 14:05 collapse

Our window.

KMAMURI@lemmy.world on 08 Jul 16:48 collapse

Tea is cheap.

skozzii@lemmy.ca on 08 Jul 15:00 next collapse

The Putin giveth and the Putin taketh away.

aphonefriend@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 08 Jul 17:26 collapse

Minus the giveth part.

gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de on 08 Jul 15:22 next collapse

tax the rich! (slight /s)

what i’m wondering is:

who exactly wanted this war? i.e., i guess it was not a single-person decision. probably a number of oligarchs are behind it because they think they can profit from either the conflict or the outcome of it.

everybody knows that wars are hella expensive. i guess most wars are decided by economic factors, i.e. who can stay solvent longer. what did the oligarchs think would happen to their wealth due to the war?

ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works on 08 Jul 19:13 collapse

Putin’s power draws from his adversaries and foreign policy. He is very weak domestically, mostly at the behest of the oligarchs that run the entire domestic policy show.

Putin muscling around internally usually has to do with the oligarch’s stance on foreign policy or the other oligarchs are wanting to eat one of their own.

But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world on 08 Jul 15:36 next collapse

Just like Ancient Rome. The dictator needs cash so he murders the rich people who aren’t his friends and takes their money

iAvicenna@lemmy.world on 08 Jul 16:39 next collapse

That’s what you get for siding with fascists. People will never learn.

[deleted] on 08 Jul 17:26 collapse
.
IndustryStandard@lemmy.world on 08 Jul 16:42 next collapse

The billionaires?

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/ac792a90-75ca-413e-9525-20b9fe03e6b0.jpeg">

aceshigh@lemmy.world on 08 Jul 17:18 next collapse

Let’s make a bingo card out of it. What are our options?

JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world on 09 Jul 14:41 collapse

So when do the oligarchs learn? How much longer do they accept the status quo?