I’m confused why is this historic I’m positive this has happened before. Why would the sexual orientation have anything to do with whether or not IVF would work.
I don’t get it.
Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 09 Sep 2023 16:20
collapse
The article isn’t about a scientific advancement, but a discussion of the limits on human rights in South Korea.
“While South Korea has not yet legalised same-sex marriage, and sperm banks in the country are only accessible to heterosexual married couples, the pair were able to tie the knot in New York in 2019, and receive IVF treatment in Europe.”
threaded - newest
<img alt="" src="https://discuss.tchncs.de/pictrs/image/cab5c4c2-6ecf-47cd-846e-cfa775d3ca0c.webm">
I’m confused why is this historic I’m positive this has happened before. Why would the sexual orientation have anything to do with whether or not IVF would work.
I don’t get it.
The article isn’t about a scientific advancement, but a discussion of the limits on human rights in South Korea. “While South Korea has not yet legalised same-sex marriage, and sperm banks in the country are only accessible to heterosexual married couples, the pair were able to tie the knot in New York in 2019, and receive IVF treatment in Europe.”