Russian ammo depot, reportedly holding 264,000 tons of munitions, obliterated near Moscow (euromaidanpress.com)
from perestroika@lemm.ee to world@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 16:51
https://lemm.ee/post/62091365

Apparently, Ukrainian drones pushed through and started a chain reaction.

Explosions reportedly continued for hours, and authorities evacuated nearby settlements. Initial reports indicate that the site, previously protected by one of Russia’s densest air defense networks, suffered catastrophic damage.

#world

threaded - newest

AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 17:06 next collapse

Kirzhach is on the far side of Moscow from Ukraine. Did the drones fly over Moscow to reach it, or did they take a longer route?

Tum@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 17:11 collapse

They may have been launched from within Russia.

gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works on 22 Apr 17:24 collapse

Yeah, that’s the fun part of going to war with an adversary that was formerly a part of your empire: they have A LOT of people that can convincingly pass as your nationals - not to mention, there’s a small but meaningful percentage of your own citizens that are going to be sympathetic enough (due to family, social, and cultural connections) to that adversary that they’d be willing to act on their behalf for stuff like this.

kooks_only@lemmy.ca on 22 Apr 17:32 next collapse

This is what the Americans who support a war with Canada don’t realize.

gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works on 22 Apr 17:39 next collapse

As an American, it is utterly insane to me that there’s a good number of Americans that are just like “huh yeah I guess we’re gonna bomb Canada to make them do what we want”.

Then again, there’s a lot of utterly insane things happening these days.

A lot of my countrymen are gonna be finding out about Type II “sorry” if we try any military adventurism. And I’m sure Greenlanders would welcome an expeditionary force of Finns, considering their rich and storied experience (5-6.5:1 KD ratio; ~5:1 overall casualty ratio, without even considering the Continuation War).

cygnus@lemmy.ca on 22 Apr 17:51 collapse

Type II “sorry”

Love this, and now that I see your username I find this quote has a Banksian quality to it.

Type I: I’m sorry
Type II: You’ll be sorry

gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works on 22 Apr 17:54 collapse

It is absolutely an Iain M Banks reference (and thank you for noticing <3). I identify as a GSV.

Type II (alternate): said cheekily, immediately after finding a loophole in the Geneva Convention

cygnus@lemmy.ca on 22 Apr 18:37 collapse

GOU Type II Sorry
ROU Geneva Suggestions
LOU Trench Raid
GCU I Never Agreed to a Truce

gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works on 22 Apr 18:40 collapse

GSV The Treaty Was Never Officially Ratified

cygnus@lemmy.ca on 22 Apr 18:50 collapse

VFP 1812 Was a Practice Run
LSV Free Healthcare
GOU Taking the U out of ‘Neighbour’

gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works on 22 Apr 19:17 collapse

HL Not So Jolly Good Fellow

ROU Memorandum? But I Hardly Know Him!

Someone@lemmy.ca on 23 Apr 01:24 collapse

The American government has already shown they’re happy to round up people who look like "foreign enemies"whether they are or not. If your enemy has almost the exact same demographics, all of a sudden there’s probable cause to detain anyone (I know, it’s not like they care about any due process but everything else feels like we’re in make believe land anyways).

bufalo1973@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 07:27 collapse

So Stalin revisited.

drmoose@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 03:09 collapse

This is exactly why Zelensky is saying Ukraine needs to be made whole for sustainble peace. Bitter Ukrainians will not let go otherwise and Russia is such an easy target for them. How will you keep peace agreement when every Russian car is a bomb now?

Carmakazi@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 17:13 next collapse

I’m pretty sure competent militaries store their munitions in networks of dozens if not hundreds of earthen bunkers per site, specifically so shit like this can’t happen.

264 kilotons is a fuckload of bombs.

AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 17:20 next collapse

I guess we don’t have an accurate source on what percentage of munitions his was.

OrteilGenou@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 17:23 collapse

I would confidently assume 100% of it was munitions

perestroika@lemm.ee on 22 Apr 17:35 collapse

If you think of the fill percentage, I think that’s too optimistic, since they’re in a war. There is constant demand. However, even 50% would be an extremely big amount, and relieve Ukrainians from a lot of pressure (last year, when a similar thing happened in Toropets, it had effects on the front within weeks). This time, from the videos I saw, there was enough to keep detonating for a long time.

Whatever the fill percentage and loss percentage, the site is closed for a long time - if something remains, it cannot be reached, it has to be examined and re-certified. But more likely, very little will remain.

In the coming days, satellite photos will tell what the situation is.

milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 04:02 collapse

I think they meant 100% of the explosions were munitions, not 100% of the munitions exploded. 'Twas a joke.

[deleted] on 22 Apr 17:21 next collapse
.
perestroika@lemm.ee on 22 Apr 17:28 next collapse

Competent ones, I think they do.

Possible explanations:

  • yet another time, someone had set money aside for personal use, consequently the bunkers had doors made of plywood or roofing tin :)

  • arrival of drones was timed to match the loading / unloading of an ammunition train (that’s when even competent militaries have to bring their stuff out)

paraphrand@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 20:06 next collapse

A bullet train, you say?

inbeesee@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 14:26 collapse

!fuckcars@lemmy.world breaks down the door

merc@sh.itjust.works on 23 Apr 04:32 collapse

someone had set money aside

That’s a very nice way to say “embezzle”.

Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 17:30 next collapse

That’s like ten small nukes.

AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 17:21 next collapse

They may not have enough manpower to guard a more distributed site, especially if they’re afraid of internal groups seizing some of it.

Corngood@lemmy.ml on 22 Apr 17:34 next collapse

Assuming I’m looking at the right thing on google maps, it does seem to be a lot of earthen bunkers with berms separating them. There are also quite a few free standing buildings scattered around.

I looked at Hawthorne Army Depot (US) to compare, and that one is a lot less dense, but it’s absolutely gigantic.

vxx@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 18:56 next collapse

It could hold that much, but according to Ukraine it was 105000 tons that exploded. Huge success though.

Klear@sh.itjust.works on 23 Apr 10:25 collapse

I’m making a note here.

Gobbel2000@programming.dev on 22 Apr 21:07 next collapse

<img alt="" src="https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/e3ea60ff-9243-41c7-8c7b-0e6d2fbbb401.jpeg">

In their infinite wisdom they apparently stored a bunch of ammunitions out in the open.

The_v@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 03:28 collapse

Russia has a long history of open storage at these sites. They also lost a ton of bunkers a few months ago at other sites. So they likely did not have much of an option, and they chose open store it at their “best defended” base.

I personally would bet that site was overstocked as it was likely the primary ammo dump by default. All of the newly manufactured missiles and shells going there directly from the factories.

raltoid@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 21:15 next collapse

Competent being the key word in that sentence, and not an accurate one based on the last few years of intel.

StaticFalconar@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 21:53 next collapse

But you can save money by putting all of them in one place

merc@sh.itjust.works on 23 Apr 04:41 collapse

I assume that bunkers protect you from a chain reaction, but that at some point the explosion is big enough that a chain reaction is exactly what you get.

This definitely seems like it would have been big enough to cause a chain reaction (and/or big enough to show that a chain reaction happened). If so, I wonder what fraction of bunkers exploded. I’m glad we live in an age of civilian satellites, so it’s probably just a matter of time before we get to see the damage for ourselves.

doeknius_gloek@discuss.tchncs.de on 22 Apr 17:14 next collapse

Good.

Retreaux@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 17:14 next collapse

This fucking rules. Eat poo, Shittin.

WheelcharArtist@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 17:20 next collapse

do putler next

homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 23:52 collapse

And his puppet

eronth@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 17:46 next collapse

What, like, percent of stored munitions would this likely be? How impactful of a destruction is it?

Metz@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 18:31 collapse

It’s hard to find reliable data about that. The last good information is from 2022 and says that Russia has stored around 1 million tons of ammunition. That would mean Ukraine just wiped out 26% of everything Russia had.

However, since it is very likely that Russia has produced a lot more since the war began, it’s hard to tell how much they actually lost today.

The only other number I could find was one that says that each day Russia uses around 26000 rounds of ammunition (artillery).

And since I’m a lazy fuck that is already lying in bed and I only have my smartphone here, I’ll let AI do the estimates and calculations.

Under the premise that most things in that depot was artillery ammo, and we roughly know the weight of a round and as said how much they use per day we can estimate they burn through 1218 tons of ammunition per day.

That would mean Ukraine just destroyed around 220 days of ammunition.

But as said, that’s just a wild guess based on some very vague numbers that I don’t have double checked now.

Valmond@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 18:44 next collapse

Wasn’t it around 10.000 rounds of artillery at the start of thf full scale invasion and now it’s a bit lower like 5-6.000?

Metz@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 18:49 collapse

That may very well be. Ukraine managed to destroy quite a lot depots already, as far as I remember. And Russia had already problems of keeping up either way because of lack of specific resources, I think.

Something along that line. This display is too small and my fingers too fat to actually check that right now.

Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 22:05 collapse

Ukraine themselves reports it at 105ktons of munitions destroyed. And honestly, I trust their remote intel better than russias direct intel on how much it was. Hehe.

SinningStromgald@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 17:59 next collapse

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/fe8860a1-6d5a-41e8-8c8a-034d11ad9bb2.gif">

floo@retrolemmy.com on 22 Apr 18:34 next collapse

Nice

ByteJunk@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 19:31 next collapse

Can we have links to more reputable, known news sites please? Never heard of that one. Here’s the BBC.

Russia’s military blamed the blast on ammunition which had detonated after the storage building caught fire due to a “violation of safety requirements”.

Huh, I suppose maybe a drone-sized violation?

IndustryStandard@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 20:39 next collapse

You cannot ask for a serious source and then link the BBC.

[deleted] on 22 Apr 21:07 next collapse
.
Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 22 Apr 21:27 next collapse

I think it’s more that the British Press in general is pretty political, heavy on the spin and hence one of the least trusted in Europe by the locals themselves.

When it comes to the Russian Invasion of Ukraine - which is very politically and geostrategically significant for the UK government - the level and direction of the bias of the BBC is no different from the Euromaidan Press hence for those who think the latter is not a “serious source”, the former is also not a “serious source”.

Mind you, on different subjects which are not related to the Russian Invasion of Ukraine (such as the Israeli Genocide in Gaza) I fully expect the Euromaidan Press is often less biased (on this specific example, significantly so) than the BBC.

Just because the BBC is posh doesn’t mean they’re honest (in fact from my own experience living in the UK, posh more often than not means fake. manipulative and dishonest)

IndustryStandard@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 21:50 collapse

Did you find that Hamas base under the hospital yet?

parody@lemmings.world on 23 Apr 03:51 next collapse

Thx for the superior one

Those media bias folks hate all sources so whichever you link to someone else is gonna hate on (for good reason perhaps!)—but 2 is better than 1 :)

ByteJunk@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 06:17 collapse

Of course I can, look, I just did.

IndustryStandard@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 12:44 collapse

At that point stick with Euromaidan. They are more credible than BBC.

ByteJunk@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 12:47 collapse

On your word?

IndustryStandard@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 12:50 collapse

No these guys

ByteJunk@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 12:55 collapse

Unlock a free trial with limited subscriber-only exclusive articles, news alerts and newsletters.

Good link thanks, let me book mark it if I ever need to waste someone’s time.

IndustryStandard@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 15:21 next collapse

Nice cop-out pretending you cannot read the headline.

ByteJunk@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 18:09 collapse

You seem to be struggling a bit, so let me help you out: the title does nothing to address the point that euromaida or whatever is not reputable.

IndustryStandard@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 21:57 collapse

Damn can you quote the title to prove you read it? You seem to be struggling with that.

ByteJunk@lemmy.world on 24 Apr 06:46 collapse

You didnt think that was worth doing when you brought it up, so why would I. You sure put in the effort, 1-line man.

IndustryStandard@lemmy.world on 24 Apr 20:21 collapse

Take the L and leave no need to dig deeper.

Snowpix@lemmy.ca on 23 Apr 15:26 collapse

Ignore IndustryStandard, they’re an idiot.

ByteJunk@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 18:03 collapse

Well sure, but where’s the fun in that? Eh eh

Thanks for the concern brother.

Snowpix@lemmy.ca on 23 Apr 21:24 collapse

That’s fair lmao

PurpleSkull@lemm.ee on 22 Apr 20:49 next collapse

Have seen euromaidanpress articles before, I think they’re legit if not a bit sensationalist and obviously very pro-Ukraine.

And of course Russia blames a smoooooking incident. There’s this one Russian guy who just smokes everywhere he shouldn’t. Munition storages, aviation bases, flagship Moskva…

figjam@midwest.social on 22 Apr 21:37 next collapse

Same guy who removes the safety rails around balconies

SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca on 23 Apr 02:20 next collapse

Why am I now picturing a chain smoking Forrest Gump? “Life is like a pack of cigarettes, you never know what’s gonna blow up.”

ByteJunk@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 06:23 collapse

Sensationalism is the kind of red flags I run away from… Obviously the BBC have their own political slant, but I’m aware of it and can correct for that. Same when I read an article from something like Fox “News”.

But if you give me some unknown site of which I don’t know the background and more importantly, who’s funding it, then it’s useless to me and I’ll just add it to the bunch of misinformation machines I run into everyday.

wewbull@feddit.uk on 22 Apr 21:44 next collapse

The safety violation will be that the ammunition wasn’t stored in the proper storage bunkers and was therefore vulnerable to an attack setting off the whole lot.

…and then an attack did just that.

ramble81@lemm.ee on 22 Apr 22:38 next collapse

Violated their air space byotch….

a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 23 Apr 09:09 collapse

Alexander Avdeyev also threatened journalists and residents with fines if they shared unofficial information about the blast.

ah yes, i always threaten journalists when there’s nothing to report

AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space on 22 Apr 22:07 next collapse

If Putler had any sense, he’d spend a fraction of his military budget on making nicotine patches available for free to his orcs. That would pay for itself in no time.

FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 02:50 next collapse

These are the people who couldn’t be stopped drinking rocket fuel so a poison additive had to be included, the fuck is a patch gonna do?

InvertedParallax@lemm.ee on 24 Apr 01:06 collapse

Their supersonic bombers had ethanol for cooling.

So their crews would take off, then get tanked.

While carrying live nukes.

Between the engineers and the aircrews, just geniuses all around.

drmoose@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 03:05 next collapse

Russians are a lost cause. 3 years and Putin is still unopposed and every single ruzki is silent doing nothing. Putin might as well eat babies for breakfast and no one would have the balls to do anything about it so sense is completely lost here.

Russian culture is beyond redemption and I say this with a heavy heart as a Russian language speaker. So incredibly disappointed.

bufalo1973@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 07:21 collapse

They aren’t opposing or we don’t know they are? Many people ask “why the US citizen aren’t doing anything against Trump?” when they have been protesting for weeks.

drmoose@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 11:14 collapse

Nah Russians are just incredibly whipped. It’s a society of given up losers.

Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 03:46 collapse

Why patch out a bug that’s working in our favor?

P00ptart@lemmy.world on 22 Apr 23:00 next collapse

Grab your favorite bottle of vodka Alexei, we’re watching fireworks tonight.

nkat2112@sh.itjust.works on 23 Apr 00:22 next collapse

Thank you for this glorious news! I love it!

Gammelfisch@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 00:32 next collapse

I hope the shrapnel flew everywhere. Kudos to Ukrainian drone pilots. Fuck the Muscovites and their foreign supporters.

Draegur@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 01:10 next collapse

If Russia truly has fucked its entire workforce into conscription, they may have to pull forces off the frontlines in order to manufacture replacements for lost equipment and munitions.

mojofrododojo@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 07:03 collapse

they’ve torn through a tremendous amount of the soviet reserve hardware they had.

but also have lost over a hundred thousand people, which is gonna hurt any workforce.

woohoo keep going Ukraine!

Sonor@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 08:46 collapse

wasn’t it like 1 million? i know it differs on how you count it, and the wounded and all, but 100k, while a lot, is one tenth of the reported numbers since the beginning.

mojofrododojo@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 08:55 collapse

it’s very hard to tell, I’m probably out of date on my numbers as well.

but teeeeeechnically, it’s over a hundred thou so… “rightish?” :D

Sonor@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 11:02 collapse

technically correct, the best kind of correct :D

FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 02:24 next collapse

Must have been one hell of a fireworks show, good hunting finding the next one.

Slava Ukraini

[deleted] on 23 Apr 04:08 collapse
.
madcaesar@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 03:06 next collapse

You love to see it!

InvertedParallax@lemm.ee on 24 Apr 01:03 collapse

No, I love to hear about ammo dumps blowing up.

Some conscripts getting his by a drone, struggling to pull themselves upright so they can end their suffering with their own rifles?

That is what I truly love to see.

Pardon me while I go rub one out.

HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works on 23 Apr 03:13 next collapse

Business insider has videos of the explosion.

businessinsider.com/blast-rocks-russian-ammo-depo…

gamer@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 12:36 collapse

“According to preliminary information, there are no casualties,” the ministry said in a statement posted to Telegram. “The cause of the fire is a violation of safety requirements when working with explosive materials.”

The article also says Ukraine hasn’t taken credit for the explosion, and that Russia has had accidents like this in the past.

Fuck Russia and all that, but now I’m thinking OP is full of shit.

Quadhammer@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 14:43 collapse

Rusky spin obviously

gamer@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 16:17 collapse

Neither the article in the OP nor the Business Insider article claim that it was an attack by Ukraine. The BI article says that Ukraine hasn’t commented on the explosion:

The Ukrainian military has not commented publicly on the explosive incident at the Russian facility. It frequently carries out long-range missile and drone attacks against Russia’s energy and military facilities, including ammunition depots.

I’m not saying they didn’t do it, or that the accident explanation isn’t propaganda, just pointing out that OP mayhaps is pulling this out of their ass:

Apparently, Ukrainian drones pushed through and started a chain reaction.

Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 03:23 next collapse

Is there a particular reason I only ever see ukraine positive war stuff? And when I see negative ukraine war stuff it’s coming out of trumps mouth?

No, I don’t follow it religiously.

turnip@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 03:27 next collapse

I’d assume because we are allied with Ukraine, and you’d see the opposite in Russia.

futatorius@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 10:39 collapse

The Trump administration is very obviously not allied with Ukraine.

TanteRegenbogen@feddit.org on 23 Apr 17:05 collapse

Well the US is not the only country that has helped Ukraine.

vivendi@programming.dev on 23 Apr 03:28 next collapse

Basically? Wartime propaganda

Ukraine has been doing individual, small wins like this and they obviously toot their horn when it happens

But on a large scale, Ukraine has been slowly losing ground

Diva@lemmy.ml on 23 Apr 03:37 next collapse

agreed, plus as it stands they’re actually somewhat on track for the “Russian disinformation” leaked 100 day peace plan

Valmond@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 08:13 next collapse

Just FYI, even general Ben Hodges says they are in a stalemate now.

vivendi@programming.dev on 23 Apr 13:55 collapse

Stalemate means Ukraine is fucked because a war of attrition potentially without US support doesn’t look good for them at all

Like, it’s amazing they managed to hold shit together for all this time and all, but damn they’re looking pretty fucked ngl

TheLunatic@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 15:38 next collapse

Eh I don’t think they are fucked. I feel like the perception that A. They REQUIRE US support to win (Which the US should be providing them ffs, you made them give up their nukes) and B. Russia is able to keep fighting long enough to win this way, are both false and largely influenced by a coordinated kremlin effort to portray russian victory as inevitable in order to strangle support for Ukraine.

For context, the Ukrainian people are fighting a defensive war and inflicting far higher casualties then they take for every metre of ground they lose and still have a hell of alot of ground to lose, whilst russia is not only at the disadvantage of being the aggressor (Which makes it harder to motivate your forces to fight),being a regime heavily dependent on the perception of their superiority (Making any attack like this a major blow to their “We are easily winning” internal narrative) and have burnt through almost their entire Cold War era stockpiles of materiel (This one is easy to check as a they were kind enough to store it outside in easy view of commercial satellites).

Tldr: Yes Ukraine is losing ground but they are losing it at a price russia can’t afford to pay so russia is desperate for the EU and US to stop supporting ukraine before the russian public wake up.

TanteRegenbogen@feddit.org on 23 Apr 17:03 next collapse

The US didn’t even contribute 30% of munitions so far. European countries are able to pick up the slack. Just look at how much Germany has donated so far.

Valmond@lemmy.world on 24 Apr 08:24 collapse

It’s the complete reverse, putin can’t continue selling his war if there are not at least marginal gains. Dictatorships are brittle. Russias economy is also flat out a 100% war economy already, there is nothing left to pour into the war any more. Add the soviet stockpiles going dry as we speak.

And if the USA steps away, which would be bad, remember Ukraine produces 40% of it’s war effort itself, the slightly larger part of the rest comes from Europe. And the EU is manning up so it will only get worse for the russians in the long run.

Ukraine will prevail, there is absolutely no doubt about it. The variable is how long time it will take to stop the war and in what way, and get the occupied regions back (yes, including Crimea).

futatorius@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 10:38 collapse

small wins like this

This is a medium to large win.

TheLunatic@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 04:26 next collapse

Russia’s apparent war plan involves lots of slow attritional fighting, which isn’t flashy and rarely results in a “Win”. Not to mention we kind of do see the russian equivalent of this attack (Bombing hospitals, shopping malls and power infrastructure) reported on, it’s just not considered a win to kill civilians in the west.

A view I agree with not only on the basis of valuing peace, life and the safety of noncombatants but also on the basis of it not being an effective way to win a war, e.g Korean war, Vietnam war, or the near leveling of London and large swaths of europe in Ww2. Strategic bombing of civilian assets just makes the people being bombed more likely to fight back and willing to endure higher casualties on the front lines.

Fun tidbit, this depot explosion was initially claimed to be “Negligence and mishandling of munitions” by the kremlin, which along with “Smoking accident” is basically shorthand for “Was hit by a drone but we don’t want to let our people know that we aren’t able to keep the war away from them”.

frezik@midwest.social on 23 Apr 15:11 collapse

Like the sinking of the Moskva, they choose a story that makes them look incompetent rather than giving the enemy a win. If you have to make this choice, you might be losing.

LoveSausage@discuss.tchncs.de on 23 Apr 07:29 next collapse

Mostly since the oligarchs in the western camp wants you to see their propaganda. It would be the other way around if you relocated. But if you really want you can find better sources.

kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 23 Apr 08:08 collapse

Link some of those sources then.

LoveSausage@discuss.tchncs.de on 23 Apr 08:17 collapse

Nah , you got internet. Do some work to keep yourself informed. I think it’s funny that this is the line here and at the same time negotiating deal is better for Russia than they suggested themselves multiple times. It’s in the mainstream now so you shouldn’t have any issues finding it. But I’m sure your copium can make the coup regime in ukraine winners here as well lol

kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 23 Apr 08:24 next collapse
pancakes@sh.itjust.works on 23 Apr 08:37 next collapse

It’s always the shadiest, most conspiratorial people that refuse to provide sources and say “jUsT gOoGLe iT”.

Provide sources or you simply will not be taken seriously, and overall look like an embarrassment.

LoveSausage@discuss.tchncs.de on 23 Apr 09:10 collapse

Nah not really it’s mostly sad conspiracy people that follow propaganda and take it for facts. Do some work you can do it.

I’m happy to discuss the fact that the start of the leaked negotiatings are better than what Russia’s demands was before.

If you don’t believe sure , you will just need to wait until it’s undeniable. But as said I’m sure even if Ukraine was flattened and a nuclear wasteland it would be a win for you somehow.

Honytawk@lemmy.zip on 23 Apr 10:40 next collapse

It is not up to us to provide sources to your claim.

Just admit you don’t have any sources and all of it was bullshit.

Triasha@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 12:43 next collapse

This is evidence that the white house is riddled with Russian plants/propaganda not that the reality on the front is worse for Ukraine than we thought.

We always knew it was bad. It has never been good for Ukraine. If it ever gets good for Ukraine you will see Russians retreating. Nobody knows where that point is, but they are almost certainly closer today than they were a year ago.

pancakes@sh.itjust.works on 24 Apr 20:34 next collapse

So no source? Not even a link? Just mindlessly spouting off?

Got it, I guess I wasted my time responding in the first place.

LoveSausage@discuss.tchncs.de on 24 Apr 21:39 collapse

Well yea… replying to you all. Perhaps, I just don’t care. Go educate yourselfs or don’t.

futatorius@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 10:40 collapse

In other words, you don’t have those sources.

Snowpix@lemmy.ca on 23 Apr 15:24 collapse

Sources are for shitlibs. Hexbearites like Lovesausage are above such trivial matters like facts and reality.

Valmond@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 08:11 next collapse

Just to add, Ukrainians information is remarkably reliant and verifiable, the russian information is kremlin lies, so from the start the russian part is just not very interesing at all.

Also obviously they both talk about good things for them, classic war propaganda.

Add in that Ukraine is the (incredible) underdog and here we are.

TheLunatic@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 16:36 collapse

This is an important point that people like to ignore, Whilst both sides exaggerate ukraine tells you there are 30 cows in a field when you can only see 28, Russia tells you there is an elephant and three dragons in the same field then tells you you’re falling for ukraines propaganda when you tell them you can only see cows.

xiii@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 08:40 next collapse

Russia had no significant gains over the last years with half a million casualties (KIA, MIA, lost limbs, war prisoners), the logistics is crumbling — they use donkeys, the economy and demographic are in the toilet but Russia is extremely good at spreading propaganda. So much so that the US admin is parroting it and putting pressure on Ukraine.

UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 12:18 collapse

Don’t you hate on donkeys! They are an excellent mean of transportation on tough terrain. I don’t know in what context russia uses them, but the US do so too :D

TastyWheat@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 12:25 next collapse

And they’re cute too although some can be mean as fuck…

Gadg8eer@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 15:57 collapse

Eh, I’ll take it if we’re talking about actual donkeys and not the Republican party of the US. Did you that, in lieu of a dog, a donkey is a perfect way to protect livestock?

I’m serious, a predator should think twice; A donkey can grab a cougar’s tail and literally beat it to death by using the wildcat as a living flail. Very protective.

Necroscope0@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 17:23 collapse

Republican party animal is the Elephant. Donkey is Dems.

TheLunatic@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 16:22 collapse

Well that’s the thing, Donkeys are good for rough terrain like the mountains of Afghanistan NOT the flat open plains of ukraine, In ukraine they are just sitting unarmoured ducks.

Furbag@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 16:13 next collapse

Negative stuff does come out from time to time, especially when Russia makes big advances, but the underdog effect means that Ukraine typically gets more attention and media coverage for their successful military operations. Russia has had scant few successes over the past few years so they are spreading propaganda that make them look as if they are winning which is getting picked up and parroted by Trump and other neo-fascists in the West.

WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today on 23 Apr 16:33 next collapse

I see negative stuff often, it’s just that there’s more positive lately. Also, the negative is neglected on purpose, because saying Ukraine is losing, would become a self-fulfilling future.

Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 17:15 collapse

Because Russia doesn’t go after strategic targets. Only civilians and because (at least in Europe) the vast majority of people fucking hate Russia. Especially countries that share a border with them or used to be part of the soviet union. Nobody hates Russia more than Russians who have managed to get out though. I had a russian colleague who basically gave up on seeing his family until after the war was over and he has no intention of ever living there after.

sheetzoos@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 03:25 next collapse

Invaders out of Ukraine.

InvertedParallax@lemm.ee on 24 Apr 01:00 collapse

Invaders must die.

If they left they wouldn’t learn the lesson.

gaael@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 06:55 next collapse

I hace no idea how serious a blow this is. Can anyone provide any sense of magnitude for these 264 000 tons of munitions? Like how big a chunk of total ammunition stockpile woukd this be? How big is it compared to current manufacturing rate?

Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip on 23 Apr 07:09 next collapse

It’s not that easy to calculate as “munitions” can be anything from artillery shells to ballistic missiles.

If we assume it’s mostly/all artillery shells, it’s roughly one month of production. Russia currently produces 250.000 units of artillery shells per month if everything goes right. Russia uses roughly 10.000 of them per day, so it would be almost one months worth of combat.

If the stockpile contained more of glide bombs and ballistic missiles, the damage is even worse because they are significantly more expensive to produce.

bufalo1973@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 07:18 collapse

But a unit of artillery shell doesn’t weigh a ton.

Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip on 23 Apr 07:31 collapse

True, for some reason, I thought of units instead of tons lmao.

The damage is significantly worse then, probably months worth of production, maybe even a year. A standard shell weighs like what, 45kg?

elrecoal19_1@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 07:48 next collapse

264.000.000kg/(45kg/unit) = around 5.866.666 units? Just wanted to have the number so others see the impact.

Sonor@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 08:37 collapse

5.866.666 That is ~587 days worth of munitions if 10k a day is a good info mentioned above. bonkers

philpo@feddit.org on 23 Apr 18:19 collapse

Don’t forget that artillery shells need charges to work. And these weight more than the actual shell.

judasferret@aussie.zone on 23 Apr 07:28 next collapse

Chatgpt thoughts… With some spot checking on the math seems right… Here’s the context of 250,000 tonnes of munitions from the Russian side:

Russia fires 10,000 to 60,000 artillery shells per day, depending on the front.

A typical 152mm shell weighs around 40–43 kg.

That means Russia can burn through 1,800+ tonnes per day in peak operations.

Russian production in 2023 was estimated at 2 million+ shells per year.

Russia also draws from Soviet-era stockpiles and imports from North Korea and Iran.

Russian doctrine favors volume over precision. Their artillery-centric strategy relies on overwhelming force rather than accuracy.

250,000 tonnes equates to roughly 6 million shells.

For Russia, that’s only about 3–5 months of usage at current intensity.

Valmond@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 08:06 next collapse

“only” 😁

judasferret@aussie.zone on 23 Apr 10:11 collapse

Indeed a decent hit!

UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 11:07 collapse

Love how this is downvoted only for another thread to come to pretty much the same conclusion lol

judasferret@aussie.zone on 23 Apr 11:26 next collapse

The AI hate is real

kmaismith@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 15:03 collapse

In an attempt to be more moderate: i think it is impolite to regurgitate the words of an LLM in a forum where we are expecting the dialogue to be between humans.

Gadg8eer@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 15:52 next collapse

That’s fair, just realize some of us are tired of online pessimism to such a degree that an AI - telling me there are in fact potential solutions and to keep trying - is actually good for our mental health. I only use Perplexity for research and musings that I sometimes post here to be discussed, not to completely replace human interaction on the Fediverse.

Wanpieserino@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 16:52 next collapse

Why do I trust a LLM more than humans? Because the LLM answers me instantly what I want to know. The human changes the subject and then after 10 interactions, they just ghost you.

reptar@lemmy.world on 24 Apr 00:48 next collapse

Is trust the right word there? Maybe interact with, value, or use?

Wanpieserino@lemm.ee on 24 Apr 03:35 collapse

People are highly biased. Le chat mistral gives me the whole story.

If I ask a marxist and a libertarian the same question, I get two completely different answers.

I cannot trust people, such a small selection of data.

I use LLM to give me a summary of all of the data and all of the opinions.

uienia@lemmy.world on 24 Apr 08:06 collapse

You think you do, but you don’t. The LLM will give you the answer you want. It most definitely does not give you all of the data and all of the opinions. It does indoctrinate you to be less critical and more lazy when it comes to fact finding though.

Wanpieserino@lemm.ee on 24 Apr 08:23 collapse
uienia@lemmy.world on 24 Apr 08:05 collapse

It answers you instantly, but you have no way of knowing the veracity of that answer. It will answer you even if there is no answer.

Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works on 23 Apr 22:37 collapse

They literally only used it to help attempt to calculate the value, said they used AI to do so. There’s no excuse besides people see Ai and hate.

WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today on 23 Apr 16:30 collapse

Blow up 2 more and be done with it

illegible@discuss.tchncs.de on 23 Apr 16:19 next collapse

I’d like to know how this converts to Beirut port blasts.

Zouth@feddit.nl on 23 Apr 17:36 collapse

It feels like I’ve read how Russia have taken massive losses every day for over two years now. In my book, if you take “massive losses” every day for two years that would mean there’s basically nothing left. I get that there daily numbers probably are massive by comparison, but still.

SkyezOpen@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 22:02 collapse

Haven’t checked numbers recently but it’s at or nearing a million killed and wounded. Not a great number but they have plenty more.

T00l_shed@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 23:34 collapse

They have people sure, but the logistics to feed and arm them? That I’m not sure

SkyezOpen@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 23:50 collapse

Haha, they haven’t had that since day 1. They just need to get shot and reveal Ukrainian locations so they can bombard them with artillery. That’s it, that’s all they’ve ever done.

[deleted] on 23 Apr 07:18 next collapse
.
Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 11:23 next collapse

Excellent news! Slava Ukraini!

crank0271@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 12:28 next collapse

Well someone isn’t getting their Christmas bonus (their family can live)

VagueAnodyneComments@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 23 Apr 14:36 next collapse

oh look they picked a new pope already

Reygle@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 15:55 next collapse

I enjoy when the news headlines remind us they CAN be good

frezik@midwest.social on 23 Apr 18:40 next collapse

Initial reports indicate that the site, previously protected by one of Russia’s densest air defense networks, suffered catastrophic damage.

Good chance Ukraine could hit the Kremlin if they wanted to. They have drones with the 500 mile range to pull it off, and Russian air defense has become a joke. The only thing that’s been stopping them was US worries about actions like that causing escalation. Ukraine has had less and less reason to care what the US thinks of late.

boonhet@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 22:03 collapse

Honestly, hitting the Kremlin may actually cause nuclear escalation. Putin’s ego would not survive the hit. Zelenskyy probably realizes this too, he’s not stupid.

Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works on 23 Apr 22:34 collapse

Idk at this point, what would Russia have to gain for radiating out Ukraine? Don’t they want that land?

boonhet@lemm.ee on 23 Apr 23:12 collapse

It’s the age old principle of “If I can’t have it, nobody can” that I’m afraid of the most. Anyone reasonable wouldn’t go by it, but if Putin is afraid he’s gonna die, he might as well.

yarr@feddit.nl on 23 Apr 08:37 next collapse

Despite the scale of the incident, Russian officials have offered limited information, with regional governor Aleksandr Avdeev confirming a “blast” but threatening penalties for spreading unofficial reports.

Man, the USA can be a shit show, but at least we can spread unofficial reports whenever we like.

Gammelfisch@lemmy.world on 23 Apr 23:22 collapse

Juicy target and hopefully the shrapnel flew fucking everywhere.