Firms with more women in top roles more likely to dismiss abusive men, study finds (www.theguardian.com)
from HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works to world@lemmy.world on 28 Mar 14:50
https://sh.itjust.works/post/57560133

Companies who employ more women in senior roles are much more likely to dismiss men accused of sexually or physically abusing their colleagues, according to analysis of international and UK data.

Men were more likely to get sacked for abusing a male colleague rather than a female colleague, according to a recent Finnish study, cited in research about the economic impact of violence against women and girls gathered by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).

It found that in female-managed organisations (those with a higher than average number of women in high-earning positions) were “significantly more likely to dismiss perpetrators”, while male-managed ones were more likely to see the victim of abuse leave the company.

The IFS cited studies that found women who are sexually or physically assaulted at work experience a major hit to their careers, “including job loss, reduced hours and lower income”. One study found that women who move in with an abusive partner see their earnings drop by an average of 12%. “These losses persist even after the relationship ends, indicating long-term damage to labour market attachment and career progression,” said the IFS.

#world

threaded - newest

FirmDistribution@lemmy.world on 28 Mar 15:20 next collapse

I mean, it’s kinda expected that more women in power means more justice to women.

Big_Boss_77@fedinsfw.app on 28 Mar 15:41 next collapse

Thank you for this comment, it clarified some things for me. I read “dismiss” as “ignore”, not “dismiss” as in “terminate employment”.

Reyali@lemmy.world on 28 Mar 15:56 next collapse

Oh my goodness I still didn’t get it until I read your comment *facepalm*

GreenCrunch@piefed.blahaj.zone on 28 Mar 16:09 next collapse

I feel like they could have worded it better, I was trying to figure that out as well.

Reyali@lemmy.world on 28 Mar 19:16 collapse

Agreed, but I realize that is a US-centric issue. “Dismiss” to the UK is equivalent to “terminate” in the US, and with The Guardian being a British newspaper, it makes sense they’d use that term.

SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social on 28 Mar 16:34 next collapse

I managed to get it before I came to this comment, but it took all my processing power.

RaoulDuke85@piefed.social on 28 Mar 17:44 collapse

Same.

FirmDistribution@lemmy.world on 28 Mar 17:41 collapse

ahahaha I found it confusing too, I had to read the article a little bit to understand it better.

mitram@sopuli.xyz on 28 Mar 16:32 collapse

Research is still important to be sure.

There have also been some studies on women led organizations concluding that they would take more aggressive and ruthless decisions, the reasons for these are contested, but some suggest that due to women being seen as less performant in leadership positions, they tend to placed in those positions when times are rough or the pressure to focus on short term gains is the highest.

[deleted] on 28 Mar 15:38 next collapse
.
AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world on 28 Mar 16:06 collapse

Firms, not films.

Mwa@thelemmy.club on 28 Mar 16:12 collapse

Mb

Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 28 Mar 16:18 next collapse

I read films too.

this headline could have been worded a lot better.

AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world on 28 Mar 16:25 collapse

That’s what I first read. It’s how I knew how you got there.

TwilitSky@lemmy.world on 28 Mar 17:34 next collapse

A person of either gender could be helpful or abusive and support abusers.

yakko@feddit.uk on 28 Mar 18:10 collapse

And yet!

obbeel@lemmy.eco.br on 28 Mar 17:45 next collapse

Sending male abusers away is the right thing to do. I’m glad women in positions of power are doing that.

obbeel@lemmy.eco.br on 28 Mar 18:54 collapse

I would like to inform that in the Finnish article mentioned (which can be accessed via Google Scholar) the authors use the word “Fire” and not “Dismiss”, so it’s even clearer.

Link: ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/…/download_file?safe_filenam…

billwashere@lemmy.world on 28 Mar 19:36 collapse

I’m not sure why there is a distinction. Toxic behavior is toxic. Fire anyone who acts inappropriately. End of story.