Mexico to send humanitarian aid to Cuba, Sheinbaum says (www.dw.com)
from MicroWave@lemmy.world to world@lemmy.world on 02 Feb 03:34
https://lemmy.world/post/42538753

The announcement comes after Donald Trump said he asked the Mexican leader to suspend oil shipments to Cuba. Sheinbaum has warned of a major humanitarian crisis on the Caribbean island.

#world

threaded - newest

HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works on 02 Feb 04:14 next collapse

Good for her. She’s got balls of steel.

FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world on 02 Feb 13:38 next collapse

Sheinbaum is awesome. I wish we could get a female candidate like her for the presidency in the US, but all they’re willing to offer up to us are eminently corrupt centrists.

comrade_twisty@feddit.org on 02 Feb 16:55 collapse

Haven’t you realized yet that Americans will vote for a senile, pedofile rapist over any female candidate you offer them.

FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world on 02 Feb 17:00 collapse

That is not true, and you can look at the 2016 vote tally as evidence.

The problem is that the female candidates we’re being provided are walking dog shit.

comrade_twisty@feddit.org on 02 Feb 17:02 collapse

Compared to the senile pedofile rapist they should have been electable even if they were zombified dinosaur shit.

FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world on 02 Feb 17:05 collapse

they should have been electable

You, and everyone else who uses that word, kinda just needs to stop. 2024 and 2016 proved that the notion of ‘electability’ is flawed and more than a little asinine.

Bernie and AOC were supposedly unelectable, and either would have done far better in either of those elections as evidenced by the fact that the Republicans adopted their politics (granted, only in the rhetorical sense) to get elected themselves.

Far as I can tell, “electable” just seems to me to be conformity to political norms, and people clearly do not want that, because the political norms are keeping them in poverty.

comrade_twisty@feddit.org on 02 Feb 17:11 collapse

Wait AOC just turned 35 in 2024, she was literally “unelectable” before then according to your constitution.

Also I meant that word in the sense that anyone with a grasp on the English language (which all other candidates had) should have won against the senile rapist pedo.

I am Swiss, so English is actually my third (or fourth of you count dialects) language… if I read a word a lot in English media I tend to incorporate it into my vocabulary… so blame your media, not my grasp on your language.

And yes, I am a huge fan of Bernie and AOC - they are both great politicians who actually seem to care about the majority of Americans and not just about their donors.

FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world on 02 Feb 17:16 collapse

Also I meant that word in the sense that anyone with a grasp on the English language (which all other candidates had) should have won against the senile rapist pedo.

I understand your meaning. The problem is you’re wrong.

And it’s just annoying to me to keep hearing the word ‘electable’ as if that means anything.

comrade_twisty@feddit.org on 02 Feb 17:19 collapse

So why did the senile pedo win - apart from racism and sexism?

Would any woman have stood a chance? Maybe a really racist woman?

FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world on 02 Feb 18:09 collapse

There are several reasons, that Dems apparently would rather just ignore and make excuses for than acknowledge. Here’s my take:

First, and foremost I think, is that neither of these two candidates won a primary. Harris was selected by a president with dementia and foisted upon the country and Hillary’s primary was rigged, a fact later admitted to in court when the Democratic Party was sued over it.

Secondly, both Hillary and Harris followed Democratic presidents whose records left their constituents vastly more impoverished. In Hillary’s case, it was Obama’s decision not to address the Great Recession in a meaningful way for the poor and working class as well as the foreclosure crisis. In Harris’ case it was Biden’s decision to ignore the affordability crisis and rampant inflation. In both cases Donald was the candidate of change, and people wanted change.

In Hillary’s case, there was also the problem of evident corruption, made public via James Comey and Wikileaks.

Lastly, both Hillary and Harris came off to voters as “electable” scripted and inauthentic, and particularly in Harris’ case, there was a clear effort to stage manage every single appearance and her campaign suffered for her desire to be so controlling; whereas Donald went on a media blitz for the entire campaign and appeared everywhere he could, and despite saying a lot of dumb shit, he came off as authentic. (and thereby, more trustworthy, because it was abundantly clear he wasn’t trying to hide himself)

If you honestly think Harris and Clinton lost because they are women and/or black, that’s your right, but I don’t think that point of view stands up to facts. It’s particularly true in Hillary’s case, given that she won the popular vote. The answer as to why they couldn’t beat such a despicable man is that they are shitty candidates who ran shitty campaigns.

FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world on 02 Feb 18:17 collapse

And this is coming from someone who predicted the outcome.

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/575eb4e5-90e7-4376-93a7-8f18cf1ca333.png">

MehBlah@lemmy.world on 02 Feb 17:37 collapse

Mexico just made selling vapes illegal. Not possessing or using them mind you just selling them. They just gave vape sales to the cartels.

whereIsTamara@lemmy.org on 02 Feb 04:59 collapse

Send oil too.

grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one on 02 Feb 06:18 collapse

plus wind turbines & solar panels

Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Feb 06:32 collapse

In fact, skip the oil

whereIsTamara@lemmy.org on 02 Feb 07:13 collapse

The oil will piss of Trump.

Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Feb 07:21 collapse

Yeah, but it’s still not worth it.

There’s SO many ways you can piss off that thin skinned baby without further accelerating the extinction event that is climate change.

ShoeThrower@lemmy.zip on 02 Feb 13:42 collapse

Yeah, why is a heavily sanctioned island nation still reliant on oil? They should just make solar panels! It really is quite unusual and problematic to still require fossil fuels in this day and age. With a population about the size of Ohio, their country sure is significant contributor to climate change. I’m sure they’ll be just fine without oil.

Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Feb 15:15 collapse

Gtfo with that ridiculous false dichotomy.

There are other and better options than “perpetuate reliance on the number one cause of the coming demise of humanity” and “don’t provide any help of any kind”

Another commenter already mentioned helping with renewable energy production in this very thread ffs!

As for assuming that not being a major contributor to climate change on a global scale makes fossil fuels harmless to the people, that’s a “smoking is actually good for you” level of willful blindness to reality 🤦

HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works on 02 Feb 18:54 collapse

The fact is that Cubans need power sources now so the smartest thing to do is send oil plus turbines and solar panels.