China unveils a powerful deep-sea cable cutter that could reset the world order (www.scmp.com)
from zaxvenz@lemm.ee to world@lemmy.world on 22 Mar 07:42
https://lemm.ee/post/59137751

The tool, which is able to cut lines at depths of up to 4,000 metres (13,123 feet) – twice the maximum operational range of existing subsea communication infrastructure – has been designed specifically for integration with China’s advanced crewed and uncrewed submersibles like the Fendouzhe, or Striver, and the Haidou series.

#world

threaded - newest

DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 07:53 next collapse

That country fucking sucks ass.

zaxvenz@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 08:30 next collapse

they’re also experimenting with dogfighting satellites

edition.cnn.com/2025/03/21/china/…/index.html

DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 08:36 next collapse

That country fucking sucks major ass. Space lasers when?

optissima@lemmy.ml on 22 Mar 08:47 next collapse

We literally have starlink and the US run by fascists with nukes. I don’t mind seeing other countries that they threaten ready to combat their information systems.

DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 08:49 collapse

Yeah, but that’s only as long as they target the US with their bullshit. Dictatorships don’t exactly have a history of stopping after „defeating“ their enemy. They’ll find new ones (spoiler it’s gonna be Europe).

Boxscape@lemmy.sdf.org on 22 Mar 11:43 next collapse

Dictatorships don’t exactly have a history of stopping after „defeating“ their enemy. They’ll find new ones

Fr dawg.

Also, I don’t really want to have to learn Mandarin, nom sayin’?

I’m firmly in middle age and don’t have the mental capacity to memorize 30,000 Chinese characters or whatever the count is.

DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 11:46 collapse

You don’t have the mental capacity to learn mandarin? lol that’s pretty nicely worded. I simply don’t have the fucks and would rather die than learn that language. I had enough trouble with French. And they use „normal“ letters.

rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 14:09 collapse

Nothing about france can be called normal even with quotation marks.

optissima@lemmy.ml on 23 Mar 04:26 collapse

Is this like how they targeted African countries economies with the Belt and Road Initiative?

DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee on 23 Mar 08:03 collapse

Idk. That at least has some mild benefits for the countries. In the form of investions and infrastructure.

Cutting cables is just an act of war if you ask me.

optissima@lemmy.ml on 23 Mar 20:29 collapse

Cutting cables is different than “I can cut cables dont touch me.”

Varyk@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 11:39 collapse

no it doesn’t, you racist.

xi is a harmful influence.

china is more than its politics.

[deleted] on 22 Mar 11:44 next collapse
.
Varyk@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 11:52 collapse

yes, it is racist to hate an entire country of people because of who they are.

that is racism. here look:

“Some deserve to be condemned. And I hate Chinese culture.”

idiotic, ignorant and absurd racism.

“And Japanese for that matter.”

racism.

“They are dystopian if you take a closer look.”

you are obviously ignorant about either of those countries and especially anything about their culture.

which utopian country are you from?

“If a country keeps a horrible leader for that many years, it also tells a lot btw”

oh look, you’re blinding ignorance.

xi abolished term limits years ago. he is not kept in power, he seized it; Trump said he would like to do the same thing.

“Normally you would re to get rid of said leaders.”

wildly historically inaccurate and ignorant!

"But apparently it’s fine. "

nope, and embarrassingly ignorant.

elflakoinri@lemmynsfw.com on 22 Mar 13:42 next collapse

The only racist asshole who i see in this comment is varik who use racist an as excuse when the asshole dont have more arguments

Varyk@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 19:42 collapse

Unsurprising, you are clearly coming from a limited awareness and perspective. Best of luck.

WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 15:31 collapse

dig your head deep in the sand, if you can’t live without that

Varyk@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 19:25 collapse

Nobody is going to join you down there except other racists. Have fun with each other.

WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 15:29 collapse

china is its politics. its culture has been majorly reshaped by their dystopian shit. Basically no one there questions their surveillance, what’s more, they ridicule those who oppose it

Varyk@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 19:33 next collapse

“china is its politics.”

Absurdly ignorant.

You think a 3000 year old country as large as the US with 1.4 billion people is defined by the recent political actions of a single leader who seized power a decade ago?

You are perceptually limited here, not the Chinese people and their culture.

You are woefully ignorant of both what “china” and “politics” are.

“Basically no one there questions their surveillance”

You obviously have no idea what you’re talking about. Do you have any evidence of this lack of questioning from 1.4 billion people? The protests? Articles? No? Of course you don’t you’re dead wrong.

“what’s more, they ridicule those who oppose it”

Chinese people are regularly censured and go to jail for protesting against Xi policies. Go ahead and provide a shred of evidence for your ignorant claims.

hark@lemmy.world on 24 Mar 00:56 collapse

china is its politics.

Funny reading this on lemmy where almost every single discussion is dominated by US politics, even on posts that have nothing to do with politics.

Monument@lemmy.sdf.org on 22 Mar 17:23 collapse

That seems less concerning to me after reading the article.

Russia and the US are also known to conduct proximity operations to their own and other satellites, she added.
[…]
Referring to China’s operations as “dogfighting” in space is “not helpful” because it “automatically ascribes hostile intentions to activities that frankly the US also undertakes,” Samson added.

It’s concerning that they are developing the capability (which can be used in multiple ways) in the same way that any geopolitical rival developing capacity that competes is concerning, but “dogfighting” evokes the idea that China is planning to fly around and blow stuff up, in an irresponsible, Kessler syndrome-inducing way.

bigFab@lemmy.world on 22 Mar 09:36 next collapse

Yes, they’re smarter than us.

DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 09:46 collapse

Thanks for the laugh.

Darkmoon_UK@lemm.ee on 23 Mar 13:53 collapse

Enjoy it while you can, they’re coming out on top.

Varyk@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 11:38 next collapse

china is pretty cool.

xi has been a harmful influence.

DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 11:41 collapse

I disagree. China is a scary place with face recognition and all that shit. I wouldn’t ever travel there. If my job sent me there, I would rather quit than travel to china.

Fuck china. Also Chinese culture in general is pretty unappealing to me, who is used to a free life without all these stupid and arbitrary „rules“ like having to be married or else you’re worthless and all that crap.

Also their factories have grids in front of windows so workers can’t kill themselves by jumping out. Tells me all I need to know.

I hate the whole thing, not just the government.

But please note that I do not blanket hate all Chinese people though.

Varyk@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 11:47 next collapse

“I disagree”

I’mthen you’re objectively wrong, as you are disagreeing with facts.

“China is a scary place”

like the US.

“with face recognition and all that shit.”

like the US.

“I wouldn’t ever travel there.”

good, they don’t need your racism you would be an embarrassment.

"If my job sent me there, I would rather quit than travel to china. "

small favors.

“. Also Chinese culture in general is pretty unappealing to me”

you obviously know nothing about Chinese culture, and are obviously very racist.

“who is used to a free life…”

houoooo

which “free” country are you from?

"I hate the whole thing, not just the government.

But please note that I do not blanket hate all Chinese people though. "

this is going to shock you, bigot, but all Chinese people are “the whole thing” that you are insulting, despite your racist tantrum being born out of obvious ignorance.

DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 11:50 collapse

Someone is very butthurt. Probably Chinese, by chance?

You keep saying „like the US“ as if that was an argument at all lol. Yes. Like the US. Both are authoritarian shitholes.

Varyk@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 11:53 collapse

“Someone is very butthurt. Probably Chinese, by chance?”

nope, just smart,well-traveled and knowledgeable.

and… not a racist like you!

DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 12:04 next collapse

I literally said that I don’t hate Chinese people, I hate the culture. That is not racist to hate „work to death“ and „be worthless unless you reach a certain social status“ etc.

I’m sure there a nice aspects. But most of the culture seems forced and cruel. It’s all dependent on social status and that’s kinda sad. I hate that. I would hate it anywhere, not just in china. I would hate it in my country too. So how is this possibly racist? Some cultures are just worse than others.

Varyk@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 12:13 next collapse

“I literally said that I don’t hate Chinese people, I hate the culture”

  1. hating a culture, especially when you don’t know anything about except the race of the people who make that culture, is racist.

  2. what you actually said is:

“That country fucking sucks ass.”

these are your new arguments:

"That is not racist to hate „work to death“ and „be worthless unless you reach a certain social status“ etc. "

nobody said that was racist, because you haven’t said those before.

what is racist is you not liking Chinese people and their culture for no reason other than their race.

I am glad you are changing your position.

“I’m sure there a nice aspects.”

there are many.

“But most of the culture seems forced and cruel.”

this is a statement born of ignorance, you can’t draw this conclusion because you obviously don’t know anything about the culture.

as seen here:

“It’s all dependent on social status and that’s kinda sad.”

this is incorrect, stop drawing racist conclusions based on your assumptions and ignorance.

“how is this possibly racist?”

what is racist is you not liking Chinese people and their culture for no reason other than their race.

to the point that you will vehemently insult an entire country, including its people, despite not knowing what you’re talking about.

DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 12:19 collapse

Tbh I’m gonna ignore you now. Call me a pussy but I’m tired of having my words twisted. I can hate the country. It’s not racist. It would be racist if I hate the people. But I don’t. I hate the culture and you say I don’t know anything about it, even though I just stated things that I know about it. I never mentioned the race. I mentioned „work to death“ to the point where there are grids in front of windows so people can’t jump. And I mentioned social status. What worth does an unmarried 34 year old man have in china? Exactly. Close to none. I know these things. Stop denying the truth.

And lastly FUCK YOU for repeatedly calling me a racist. You’re a fucking idiot if you think that. I clearly and obviously stated that I hate the culture, not the people. And I will say it again. I don’t hate Chinese people. I hate their culture and their government.

Kill me for it. I’m done with this useless discussion.

newthrowaway20@lemmy.world on 22 Mar 13:17 next collapse

It’s all good dude. The other people reading this realize you’re not a racist, and that other guy you’re arguing with is extremely narrow in his definition and unnecessarily combative over semantics, to the point of being anal-retentive.

DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 13:20 collapse

Thank you. I was starting to question myself but seriously couldn’t see anything wrong.

Also your description of this person is very polite. I would have just called them a fucking asshole.

Edit: I love how the person I replied to deleted all of their comments. Says a lot.

Varyk@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 20:24 collapse

I haven’t deleted any of my comments. Why would I?

I prefer confronting bigots and those with limited understanding and correcting their ignorance.

You being racist is not “all good dude.”

You changing your tune is not bad, though.

Varyk@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 20:18 collapse

You’re the only one frightened enough to be using personal insults.

Saying an entire country sucks ass when all you know about it is the race of its people is racist.

Hating cultures you don’t know anything about is racist.

What you said is racist.

I’m glad you’re changing your tune, but it doesn’t change your earlier racism.

“…I know these things.”

You are factually incorrect. you obviously know nothing about china if you think a huge swath of their workforce is useless.

You don’t know things, you are ignorant of things.

what you know: “I hate the culture”, “I hate Chinese culturue”, “fuck China”, “I hate the whole thing”

Most of this is defined as “cultural racism” - "Cultural racism is a concept that has been applied to prejudices and discrimination based on cultural differences between ethnic or racial groups. This includes the idea that some cultures are superior to others "

You said you hate all of it,which includes the 1.4 billion people, which is more conventional racism.

You are racist and are saying racist insults. That’s who you are now, but you do not have to be stuck there.

Now you are trying to change what you said, and claim you are not racist. That’s a good first step, really.

Gigasser@lemmy.world on 23 Mar 00:21 collapse

You hate the culture as a whole? Or hate just the regressive/reactionary/conservative/more traditional(to a westerner) elements of it?

DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee on 23 Mar 07:46 collapse

Dude how many exceptions you have to make for this argument to even work tells you everything you need to know.

qyron@sopuli.xyz on 22 Mar 12:29 next collapse

I followed the thread just to see where it landed and I was not disappointed.

And for a well travelled and knowleadgeable person, you give off a very narrow view.

So, in one corner, we have an authoritarian regime, well established, known for violently suppressing minorities and heavilly surveill the citizens, take over territories, and constantly menace and threaten others, while thriving by manipulating money flow world wide and internally using slave work to run their industries.

On the other, we have the exact same thing, but flag and language changes. And classical political quadrant.

You can loathe a regime and have nothing against the people underneath it. Chinese were lead into an authoritarian regime through force, Americans were subtly led to the same through fear. The original premise: a land of freedom, for the people.

If we can not agree both countries are, essentially, the same, then one of us is refusing to aknowledge facts, willingly.

Varyk@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 20:06 collapse

“So, in one corner, we have…” a biased collection of recent historical political actions by one man by which you are judging an entire country, its culture that has existed at least 300 times as long as that dictator, as well as a population of 1.4 billion other people.

“On the other, we have…” a failed direct comparison that falls apart under the lightest scrutiny.

“You can loathe a regime and have nothing against the people underneath it”

nobody argued you can’t.

“Chinese were lead…” oh boy. rough.

“Americans were subtly led…”

HAhah, come on…okay. Please elucidate the subtleties of the American conservative, particularly their blunt leader.

“The original premise: a land of freedom, for the people.” This is incorrect. a “Muslim ban” was proposed.

look at his policies. Rump is a rapist. not a subtle rapist, just a rapist.

“f we can not agree both countries are, essentially, the same, then one of us is refusing to aknowledge facts”

I think you are much more ignorant of the facts than refusing to acknowledge them here.

These countries are not the same at all. All facts go against your failed comparisons here and the similarity between the two countries overall.

In fact, you argue against your own conclusion by claiming the two recent dictators came to power differently.

You have no cohesive point or consistency except for how contextually and factually ignorant you are regarding every point you try to make.

qyron@sopuli.xyz on 22 Mar 20:58 collapse

I like how you instantly decided I was talking about China when writing that list. Shows your bias. But if you recognized it, good. Only means the similarities run deep enough for both countries to be mistaken by one another.

Thank you for remembering China has, technically, the longest standing continuous civilization. I’m aware. But since we are focusing our attention on recent history, let’s say last 70 years, I’m going to opt out the rest as not relevant for the discussion at hand.

Shall we deny the revolution led by Mao ended in violence against his own countrymen and revolutionary allies? The decades of disastrous policies, of cultural, religious and social repression, all of those considered classical indicators of established totalitarian regimes?

Meanwhile, across the Pacific, let’s also ignore and deny the ever growing shadow power and pressure on the government by the “conservative” to hold back or cull whatever small advancements on the social front made, since the 1950’s, paired with the constant recitation of the fear against communism.

There was violence and repression on both ends of this argument, obviously; one enacted it through bullets, while the other enacted it through the pen. Different methods, same results. Fascinating how any ideology, when led to it’s extremes degenerates into essentially the same outcome.

Now, if you will allow me, I am going to preserve my critical and accusatory position towards the political establishments of China and USA, as both being authoritarian repressive dangerous regimes.

Varyk@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 21:26 collapse

“…you instantly decided I was talking about China when…”

Yes, seeing as how you said you were commenting on a thread about China and the US, and then at the end mentioned the Chinese and the Americans by name with reference to your comments, I did come to the conclusion you were talking about China and the US.

since you were literally talking about China and the US.

“Thank you for remembering China has, technically, the longest standing continuous civilization.”

I did not say that and that is incorrect, but you’re welcome.

“I’m aware”

clearly, you are not.

“But since we are focusing our attention on recent history…”

that is your personal myopia, do not speak for others.

“Shall we deny the revolution led by Mao…”

I guess you could, but I don’t see the point of disagreeing with me there.

His regime and its effects are very well documented, If you look into it at all, you’re just going to prove me right.

“let’s also ignore and deny the…”

go for it.

you understand that your denial of basic historical facts is the reason you are so far off base here, right?

“Fascinating how any ideology, when led to it’s extremes degenerates into essentially the same outcome.”

I was waiting for your historically incorrect conclusion of magnet theory, and you finally made your way there.

your argument that the sky and the ocean are the same thing because they’re so far apart from each other is a ridiculous conclusion, but explains your thought process.

qyron@sopuli.xyz on 22 Mar 21:56 collapse

You finished waving your red herrings around?

Varyk@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 23:23 collapse

I have to get all your uninformed false starts out of the way somehow.

qyron@sopuli.xyz on 23 Mar 00:12 collapse

You need me to recap this exchange inception? Allow me.

I injected myself in this as you made your opinion on how another person was racist torwards chinese in general, as they saw China, the country, as in the regime, as dangerous.

You ascertained your moral high ground out of being well travelled and cultured, without ever addressing a single point of the other person’s argument. Your concern was their apparent racism under your higher morality.

I opted by criticizing this position of your, by clearly stating why and how someone can loathe a country’s regime without having nothing against the people living there, adding in the process why I personally find America snd China’s regimes parallels, although ideologically opposite.

Again, you chose reiterating I am wrong in my views but without addressing a single point of it, except for making vague hollow observations that add nothing to the conversation, not adding counter points of information. Twice.

I’ve already deemed this a closed argument. I am doing it again. Be well, have a good one.

Varyk@sh.itjust.works on 23 Mar 01:32 next collapse

“You need me to recap this exchange…?”

nope, I did that for you a couple comments above.

“as they saw China, the country, as in the regime, as dangerous”

you are making things up. That is not what @DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee said.

@DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee said:

“I hate the culture”, “I hate Chinese culturue”, “fuck China”, “I hate the whole thing”

The whole thing, sport. The people, the culture, the whole thing.

After I pointed out this was racist, DP was quick to change his tune, and say he hated everything about China, specifically the culture, except the people.

Hating culture or thinking one is superior to another is racism, especially when you know so little about the culture except the people who make it up.

Quick def for you: “Cultural racism is a concept that has been applied to prejudices and discrimination based on cultural differences between ethnic or racial groups. This includes the idea that some cultures are superior to others”

“Your concern was their apparent racism”

Yeah, I don’t like racism so I call it out when it occurs. Usually it stems from ignorance, and they just have to be called out to be woken up.

“criticizing this position of your,”

not my position, you’re making this up.

" personally find America snd China’s regimes parallels,”

absolutely absurd, as I explained above. but it’s good you changed your tune to: “although ideologically opposite”, which is still incorrect but more open-minded.

See, all I have to do is call you guys out and you start thinking more critically.

“without addressing a single point of it”

Which part do you want more help on? I have a lot of time and am free to continue correcting and educating you.

“without addressing a single point of it”

clearly not true, and you know it:

“except for…”

except for addressing every single point. With verifiable knowledge.

“I’ve already deemed this a closed argument”

Oh, clearly, it’s so closed you needed to write paragraphs rewriting yours and others’ comment history and reframing their racism.

“Be well, have a good one.”

Thanks, I’m having a GREAT one!

itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 23 Mar 11:40 collapse

I don’t wanna get in on the whole shouting match whether China bad or China good, but DicksAndPozza was pretty explicitly not talking about the regime, but the Chinese culture and people. Which is racist.

qyron@sopuli.xyz on 23 Mar 12:15 collapse

And what I read and understood was a loathing for the regime and social practices by it enacted onto the general populatio ln and not a generalized hatred towards the average individual. I also found there was an exageration to their words, although crude, but every person has their way to convey emotion.

There are better ways to confront people on their views than to start from insult.

Did my replies come out as shouting? Damn. Not what I intended.

WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 15:40 next collapse

I see that your english is a bit wrong. It’s not smart, neither knowledgeable when opinions are presented as facts, that is called dumb and deceived in english

Varyk@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 19:24 collapse

“…as facts, that is called dumb and deceived…”

You use incorrect words, conjugations, punctuation and definitions as incorrect responses to your own reading incomprehension. I can help you with your English(the capitalized language).

Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 17:31 collapse

Your comments really come off as CCP propaganda. Either you drank the Koolaid, or your trying to fool people for the sake of a shitty government.

Varyk@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 19:14 collapse

“Your comments really come off as CCP propaganda”

i warned against condemning and insulting am entire country of people and their culture because the self-appointed dictator is a harmful influence.

so by me criticizing the head of the CCP and his harmful influence on China, you are seeing “CCP propaganda”?

sounds like you might be influenced by…propaganda.

“trying to fool people for the sake of a shitty government.”

how does my criticism of the head of the Chinese government in charge of all policy decisions in the last decade fool youn into support of the Chinese government?

tane@lemm.ee on 23 Mar 12:29 collapse

Yeah man zero AI facial recognition tech in the USA that stuff is only for the evil Chinese. Listen to yourself you propagandized idiot

DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee on 23 Mar 12:35 collapse

I never said it didn’t happen in the USA? Not everyone lives there lol. Some people live in Europe where this doesn’t happen.

But it’s most blatantly used in china.

Also fuck you for calling me an idiot. Why is everyone resorting to insults? Are you a child?

Pilferjinx@lemmy.world on 22 Mar 11:59 collapse

It’s give and take. China is smart enough to invest in its country and its people. They’re making great scientific and technical advances that’s on a course that will surpass the west in many areas. The individual rights and freedoms are terrible though to the point where unsanctioned creativity is punished.

DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 12:08 next collapse

The whole country is dystopian. But agree there are smart people. They are just used for doing/inventing awful stuff.

They are playing the long game and are currently the only ones benefiting from all that happens. They sit by idly watching our idiot leaders antagonise each other.

kautau@lemmy.world on 22 Mar 13:23 collapse

Lmao people will say this same shit about the us in 8 years when all the rights have been stripped and it’s run by tech bros

AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world on 22 Mar 14:12 collapse

Yes. In many ways, China is exactly what Republicans wet dream about. A single party runs unopposed controlling all elements of government. Criticizing them is illegal. All businesses are protected by the government from uppity customers. Employees are expected to work 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. 6 days a week for few benefits with almost no workers rights…

It’s the Republican dream.

yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 19:35 collapse

You know as much about china as dolphins do about integrated circuits.

tane@lemm.ee on 23 Mar 12:26 collapse

This entire website is heavily propagandized about China I’ve noticed. It really sucks that you just can’t seem to have a normal conversation about China anywhere in the internet without propagandized freaks shouting at you that it the worst country that has ever existed

Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world on 22 Mar 08:13 next collapse

Fucker McGucker, this is evil

gigachad@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 08:28 next collapse

…as reported by the South China Morning Post lol

zaxvenz@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 08:38 next collapse

let’s hope it’s bs

oce@jlai.lu on 22 Mar 08:58 collapse

They already do it by simply dragging boat anchors across, it’s obviously going to be weaponized further. There have multiple data and power cables cut like this in the Baltic sea recently. edition.cnn.com/2024/12/30/europe/…/index.html

zaxvenz@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 09:08 collapse

max depth of baltic sea is 1,500 ft

oce@jlai.lu on 22 Mar 09:23 collapse

And it was done with something no designed for this purpose. Why is it hard to conceive that a tool designed for it would do much better?

zaxvenz@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 09:29 collapse

because military subs can’t go that deep. It’s a lot harder to police.

oce@jlai.lu on 22 Mar 16:30 collapse

I don’t think they need to send people down or even complex sensors, they could use a similar dumb tactic, as above, of dragging something heavy for kilometers, until they can confirm that there was a disruption on the network.

Tiger@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 10:55 collapse

Historically they were a solid paper, based out of Hong Kong. It’s a toss up these days though, not sure.

Korhaka@sopuli.xyz on 22 Mar 08:53 next collapse

Good thing we have the channel tunnel I guess, repurpose that for data cables that are protected.

WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 15:49 collapse

I didn’t know we have a channel tunnel to the american continents

Korhaka@sopuli.xyz on 22 Mar 16:52 collapse

Sure, it will be a shame to lose south/central America and Canada, but nothing else of value over there.

WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works on 23 Mar 00:00 collapse

most of online services run there. google, youtube, everything microsoft, credit card processing mastercard and visa, tons of others. surely they have EU infrastructure, but it’s a big question how would they handle a network split, if aallt

Diva@lemmy.ml on 22 Mar 11:09 next collapse

Operational depth is essentially the same as the claimed operational depth that oceangate sub that popped the other year. I have a lot more confidence that these things will actually work when China does it instead of some incompetent millionaire/billionaire.

az04@lemmy.world on 22 Mar 12:40 next collapse

This could have been a The Onion title

TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 12:56 next collapse

SATCOM here we come!

kautau@lemmy.world on 22 Mar 13:22 next collapse

Weird way to pronounce starlink, since it seems that’s what they’re hoping for. Privatizing the government

rudi@lemmy.sdf.org on 22 Mar 15:17 next collapse

Seriously… Anything but Starlink

NOT_RICK@lemmy.world on 22 Mar 15:42 collapse

Don’t worry, they’re working on satellite warfare too. Kessler syndrome, here we come

Madison420@lemmy.world on 22 Mar 17:07 next collapse

Working on the thing we’ve had for half a century? Improving sure but thaad and kenetic kill devices have been around forever like South Korea just showed video of their testing which means it’s almost certainly last gen and the new Gen is deployed.

youtu.be/RnofCyaWhI0

youtu.be/DfiAPx0rPXg

Monument@lemmy.sdf.org on 22 Mar 17:41 collapse

I sincerely hope they’re smart enough not to trigger that.

Someone posted an article elsewhere on the thread about China practicing “dogfighting” in space - which, after you remove the fear-mongering, is just them figuring out how to do satellite-satellite maneuvering. Still immense opportunity for runaway collisions, but it seems like the military applicability is more toward sabotage than blowing things up. I could definitely see a scenario where high value satellites have had small boosters affixed to them, their electronics tampered, or some other way of commandeering or de-orbiting them to deprive their owners of them. A microwave + laser could disable smaller sats from above, then ablate some of their exterior to sap momentum so gravity drops them in short order. (Maybe. That’s idle speculation, but generating the power and dissipating the heat in space could make that idea impossible.)

mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 22 Mar 18:52 collapse

Yeah, the only feasible way to do satellite warfare without creating a ton of debris is to mechanically attach to an enemy satellite and drop it out of orbit.

Like imagine an autonomous attacker satellite that clamps onto the target satellite, and uses thrusters to drop itself (and the target) into the ocean. Any kind of kinetic weaponry to destroy the target satellite will just end up with a debris cloud around the earth, making future space travel impossible.

But no country wants to invest in satellites just to intentionally drop them out of orbit. Every single attack would be prohibitively expensive when compared to just firing a missile at the satellite.

NotLemming@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 13:40 next collapse

Let me guess, they already tested it

Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world on 22 Mar 16:57 next collapse

“That could reset the world order”

Lmao, what hyperbolic bullshit. It’s just a cable cutter. Most nations have shit like this, but thanks for letting us know in the title this is just Chinese propaganda.

josefo@leminal.space on 23 Mar 05:32 collapse

It will shift the orders from cables to starlink. Not the best idea tho, it sucks ass

b3an@lemmy.world on 23 Mar 08:01 collapse

Just wait! Then they’ll start flooding space with mini satellites. Then they’ll start dogfighting with them. :)

mullaghmore@feddit.dk on 23 Mar 09:08 next collapse

You’re like a day behind on the news 😄

b3an@lemmy.world on 23 Mar 14:43 collapse

I knew when I wrote it 🙈

FrChazzz@lemm.ee on 23 Mar 09:24 collapse

DOGEfighting

FauxLiving@lemmy.world on 22 Mar 18:50 next collapse

Powerful seems like a pointless adjective here.

It doesn’t take much power to destroy a cable. Did they invent a really long, and powerful, chain with a powerful anchor on it only usable by a boat with powerful electric winch?

Maybe they put AI in it too, for extra power of course

PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world on 23 Mar 06:11 collapse

Oh you mean the AI Pro Power Winch 9000? Available at a genocidal dictatorship near you for 3 easy payments of 19.99B USD.

Eezyville@sh.itjust.works on 22 Mar 21:44 next collapse

If I had that type of technology I would not advertise it

Kabriste@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 21:58 next collapse

For me it’s quite the opposite. It’s all about power projection in the grand scheme of things.

CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world on 23 Mar 08:37 collapse

A doomsday device is useless if no one knows you have it.

itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 23 Mar 11:20 collapse

“why didn’t you tell the world, eh?”

Wahots@pawb.social on 22 Mar 23:41 next collapse

No shit, lol. Those cunts have been cutting cables for almost a year now. This is why countries tend to hide the exact locations of cables. Shit is expensive.

Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca on 23 Mar 00:47 next collapse

Reset the world order by sending everybody including China back to stone age right? That’d be fun.

LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world on 23 Mar 06:08 next collapse

Well, everybody except people hooked up to Starlink and other satellite based internet

CarrierLost@infosec.pub on 23 Mar 12:56 collapse

You realize that data comes from the same place, right?

LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world on 24 Mar 05:15 collapse

Are we talking about the data? I understand the hosts and servers are fine, but if the cables are all destroyed, we will have to rely on access to satellite internet. They are actively economically attacking Verizon, canceling contracts they had and replacing them with SpaceX ones.

Like have ANY of you EVER roleplayed in DnD or like, done anything? Are you just chronically bamboozled? Genuinely curious. I talk to ppl like this all day every day - are you just stupid? Am I stupid for being here talking to you all trying to communicate what’s happening?

Maybe you’re just dissociated and unable to register everything. Idk. Jesus.

[deleted] on 23 Mar 21:34 collapse
.
Litebit@lemmy.world on 23 Mar 06:04 next collapse

If only cables can be designed to pull down ships that try to cut or anchor drag them. Maybe defensive cable around the main cable. Or some kind bigger of casing/shell around actual cable.

Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 23 Mar 13:58 collapse

That’s not how reality works… You can’t make the cable pull down the ship. And even if you could they’d just lose the anchor

riodoro1@lemmy.world on 23 Mar 07:38 next collapse

Please, do it

nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 23 Mar 12:33 collapse

no don’t

Dasus@lemmy.world on 23 Mar 13:26 next collapse

Coming soon to vague shell corporation owned fishing boats to the shore of the Baltic and Northern seas!

Sponsored by China and Russia

werefreeatlast@lemmy.world on 23 Mar 13:47 next collapse

Me resetting the world order:

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/4c8cca75-68c9-4ca5-9dba-89bf7c69ba55.gif">

I can have 2 million of these tomorrow! Who’s biting?

brammis@lemm.ee on 23 Mar 14:58 next collapse

This is why we can’t have nice things.

phoenixz@lemmy.ca on 23 Mar 15:28 next collapse

Cool

So for every European deep sea cable cut it should send a fleet of Russian and Chinese ships to the bottom, torpedo the fuckers. Just by default presume it was either of them and make then responsible for the safety of our cables. If you fail to protect our cables, we’ll send your ships to the next life.

Gloves. Off.

shalafi@lemmy.world on 23 Mar 22:14 collapse

Exactly what I’ve been screaming. Hang the captain and first mate, scuttle the fucking ship. This shit needs to be treated as piracy, no quarter given.

lud@lemm.ee on 24 Mar 00:36 collapse

Luckily capital punishment is banned in most countries.

shalafi@lemmy.world on 24 Mar 00:43 collapse

And that attitude is why China continues to test us, they know we’re pussies. You should see what they’re pulling on Vietnam and the Philippines in the South China Sea.

lud@lemm.ee on 24 Mar 01:16 collapse

I really don’t care.

Capital punishment is immoral and that’s that.

shalafi@lemmy.world on 25 Mar 01:46 collapse

Glad you’re in a society that is able to entertain that notion. Looks like that society is going to collapse. Good luck.

lud@lemm.ee on 26 Mar 06:34 collapse

From my point of view the country most famous for its death punishment is collapsing.

ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 23 Mar 15:29 next collapse

I mean, no? Ok let’s say you did cut off the internet, there’s still radio. Shortwave still can reach spies in foreign countries with their numbers stations now, and then there’s VHF/UHF at home etc. Snail mail still exists, so does ol’ fashioned landlines for communication at least internally even if they cut undersea telcom cables, hell I’m pretty sure CDMA would still be running, this sets us back to like 1990 at most, especially if we take this threat seriously and start implementing non-internet based (or sat internet) fallbacks just in case standard comms go down for a while until a new cable can be lain.

Like don’t get me wrong, we’d definitely feel the effects, but this isn’t some kind of world dominating shit we’re talking about here, it’s just pretty inconvenient, especially if we already have alts in place as fallbacks so we don’t have to scramble to set them up.

theherk@lemmy.world on 23 Mar 16:04 collapse

The knock on effects of substantial infrastructure interruptions like this can have massive impacts that snowball aggressively. Not saying you’re wrong, but it is nothing to scoff at. Things like this do have the potential to severely change the geopolitical landscape.

ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 23 Mar 16:42 collapse

I’m not saying it’s nothing, just saying I think it’s massively overstated.

REDACTED@infosec.pub on 24 Mar 20:26 collapse

This feels really dumb from China. This is not a weapon against military. This is a weapon against civilian insfrastructure. You don’t get minds and hearts of people by attacking something they love