US forces seize oil tanker off Venezuela coast (www.theguardian.com)
from grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one to world@lemmy.world on 10 Dec 20:18
https://lemmy.myserv.one/post/23878570

US forces have seized an oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela, in a major escalation of Donald Trump’s four-month pressure campaign against the South American country’s dictator, Nicolás Maduro.

#world

threaded - newest

KoboldCoterie@pawb.social on 10 Dec 20:22 next collapse

Let me guess… It was carrying drugs? Just packed full of cocaine? Can’t wait to hear the justification for this one.

dugmeup@lemmy.world on 10 Dec 20:41 next collapse

Oil is drugs mmmkay

ceenote@lemmy.world on 10 Dec 20:46 next collapse

It is addictive…

Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Dec 09:33 collapse

The mere though of getting their hands on so much “free” oil made many in this Administration high.

logicbomb@lemmy.world on 10 Dec 21:23 next collapse

It was carrying drugs?

This type of drug has several street names, among them, black gold and Texas tea.

huquad@lemmy.ml on 10 Dec 21:54 next collapse

Hamas actually \s

ohulancutash@feddit.uk on 11 Dec 21:13 collapse

It has been under US sanctions since 2022 for supplying the Iranian Revolutionary Guards. It was spoofing its position. It was flying a false flag.

As to the legal justification, there are technicalities that could be argued. But that’s incidental to the intention here probably.

Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca on 10 Dec 20:22 next collapse

“Where’s my Nobel Peace Prize?”

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works on 10 Dec 21:03 collapse

All you get is a soccer peace prize.

kindred@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 10 Dec 21:11 next collapse

*Football ball-fondling prize

WanderingThoughts@europe.pub on 10 Dec 21:53 collapse

Some random trophy from a pawn shop with a fresh coat of gold paint from a spray can should work.

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works on 10 Dec 21:58 next collapse

Somebody give him an enlarged version of this and tell him it’s the Nobel Peace Price.

<img alt="" src="https://mostexpensivecoins.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Harriet-Tubman-2024-Uncirculated-Five-Dollar-Gold-Coin.jpg">

FatVegan@leminal.space on 11 Dec 09:30 collapse

He reminds me so much of my little nephew sometimes. He’s obsessed with trophies and medals. When we’re in a store where they sell trophies, he asks me if they are “real” and i try to explain to him that trophies aren’t “real” they are just a symbol. Sometimes for nothing. And he tries to understand. And then when i ask him if i should buy him a meaningless trophy, he goes yes pleeeease, a big one.

grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one on 10 Dec 20:23 next collapse

definitely not about the oil!!!

idriss@lemmy.ml on 11 Dec 19:52 collapse

freedom?

aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 12 Dec 08:21 collapse

Nah. The Venezuelans are jealous of all the freedom that the yankees have :)

[deleted] on 10 Dec 20:37 next collapse
.
ThePantser@sh.itjust.works on 10 Dec 20:46 next collapse

Surprised they didn’t just blow it up. I guess we’re doing piracy now.

logicbomb@lemmy.world on 10 Dec 21:25 next collapse

Actually, hearing about this, I’m now surprised that our military didn’t stop the fishing boats first to siphon all of the gasoline out of their tanks before blowing them up and murdering their crew.

prex@aussie.zone on 10 Dec 21:54 collapse
huquad@lemmy.ml on 10 Dec 21:55 collapse

Always have been

Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 10 Dec 20:47 next collapse

Huh, I wonder why they seized it instead of shooting it like the others? It couldn’t possibly be for the oil, right?

Taiatari@lemmynsfw.com on 10 Dec 20:50 next collapse

In contrast to people, oil has a market value.

frongt@lemmy.zip on 10 Dec 21:09 next collapse

Never heard of human trafficking?

Oil is just a lot more profitable and easier to work with.

chaogomu@lemmy.world on 10 Dec 21:47 next collapse

Trump has plenty of experience as a human trafficker, but those were underage models in his little fake modeling agency, Trump Model Management, which was a friendly competitor to Epstein’s MC2 Model Management.

But I can understand him not wanting to draw on that experience here. That and Hegaeth is a murderous fuck, and he was the one awake enough to give the order.

[deleted] on 12 Dec 07:55 collapse
.
Agent641@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 00:51 next collapse

You’re not getting paid top dollar for your people? You should see my people guy, he do you a good deal.

Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Dec 09:22 next collapse

I genuinelly believe at least some people in positions of power inside and around the MAGA-Fascist party have plans to make Slavery legal again.

(I would certainly bet that Peter Tiel is one of those).

Randomgal@lemmy.ca on 11 Dec 14:33 collapse

It is already legal. You just have to be in jail.

MrMakabar@slrpnk.net on 11 Dec 14:33 collapse

That can be changed. Pretty sure Trump is not opposed to slavery.

iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works on 10 Dec 21:06 next collapse

I mean, I know what your point is, but can we actually just be thankful that they did not in fact blow up an oil tanker and spill all that into the sea?

Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 10 Dec 21:21 next collapse

For sure. They shouldn’t have blown up the other boats either, but spilling the oil into the sea would certainly have been bad.

village604@adultswim.fan on 10 Dec 21:23 collapse

Technically the other ships they blew up spilled oil in the sea.

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 10 Dec 21:38 next collapse

No. I will not thank them for seizing the ship. That’s a ludicrous suggestion.

ech@lemmy.ca on 10 Dec 22:29 collapse

That’s not what they said.

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 11 Dec 02:51 collapse

It’s equivalent to what they said. If someone comes over and punches you in the head should I be thankful they didn’t stab you?

iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works on 11 Dec 03:06 next collapse

You can, in fact, be thankful that you weren’t stabbed while also being upset that you were punched. Adults can have more than one emotion at a time. Never heard of a “silver lining”? It’s an idiom for a reason.

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 11 Dec 05:56 collapse

Who am I being thankful toward? Who am I giving thanks to in this specific case?

ech@lemmy.ca on 11 Dec 03:35 collapse

It’s equivalent to what they said.

It’s not.

Ilixtze@lemmy.ml on 10 Dec 21:44 next collapse

We should not be thankful to nazi shit

prex@aussie.zone on 10 Dec 21:51 next collapse

Just tow it outside the environment.

iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works on 10 Dec 23:55 next collapse

Into another environment.

prex@aussie.zone on 11 Dec 04:59 collapse

There is nothing out there - all there is is sea, and birds, and fish.
And 20,000 tonne of burning crude oil.

metallic_substance@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 03:29 collapse

That’s space bro. You’re describing outer space

neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works on 11 Dec 12:16 collapse

For your contextual enjoyment for the joke you might be missing.

metallic_substance@lemmy.world on 12 Dec 01:12 collapse

Yes, I did miss this. I’ve seen that video but it’s been forever, forgot how great it is. Thank you

corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca on 10 Dec 21:52 next collapse

The deep water horizon did not show America too concerned about oil in the Gulf. I’m not sure they care where it goes if they can’t have it.

What, have they escalated to blockading Cuba now?

jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works on 10 Dec 23:57 collapse

We begin to care about it as soon as it shows up as black sandy globs on the beach and sticks to our feet.

wheezy@lemmy.ml on 11 Dec 00:29 collapse

And, uh, kill all of the innocent people on board. Sorry, I just feel like that should be said.

iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works on 11 Dec 01:00 collapse

Well when I had made the comment, there was no news on whether or not they had done that anyway.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 10 Dec 21:18 next collapse

I can think of a few reasons why the US Navy wouldn’t want to fire high explosives into a contain full of flammable materials, depending on the range of their artillery.

Also definitely possible they’re just doing Privateer shit with Navy assets. I do wonder whether the vessel gets escorted to a friendly port in El Salvador or Honduras and quietly re-flagged and titled.

MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 10 Dec 21:43 next collapse

Hegseth issuing letters of marque

MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca on 11 Dec 08:28 collapse

They don’t really use actual artillery anymore, it would be missiles from the ship or a plane.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 11 Dec 06:42 collapse

blowing up a tanker would cause a huge hazard to the area, spilling oil all over the ocean.

Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 11 Dec 12:51 collapse

When you put it like, that, that sounds like exactly what they’d want off the coast of Venezuela right now.

MrMakabar@slrpnk.net on 11 Dec 14:32 collapse

Venezuelas oil infrastructure is in such bad shape, that oil spills are pretty common. Lake Maracaibo has them on a regular bases.

Asafum@feddit.nl on 10 Dec 20:59 next collapse

A little on the nose, no?

It’s like a complete package, the actual visual representation of what they want to do with Venezuela.

DaddleDew@lemmy.world on 10 Dec 21:03 next collapse

They’re going to find $50 worth of weed in one of the sailor’s personal quarters and claim that the multi millon dollar tanker carrying millions worth of crude oil was a drug running vessel.

L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works on 10 Dec 21:04 next collapse

Ruh-roh. Trump and Hegseth forgot the US has a 100% losing record against countries that start with V.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 10 Dec 21:21 next collapse

Vietnam lost over a million of its people during the US invasion and occupation. It’s all cutesy and smug to tally this as a Big L for Team USA. But I don’t think anyone in that country values the W/L record over the hundreds of thousands of family members, friends, and other loved ones who died to feed the American war machine’s rapacious appetite.

That’s before we even talk about the ecological damage that haunts Vietnam to this day. Or the deaths in Laos and Cambodia racked up in collateral. Or the tenuous diplomatic relationships between the various South Pacific neighbors based on Cold War grudges, which have re-emerged as a shooting war between Thailand and Cambodia just last month.

village604@adultswim.fan on 10 Dec 21:24 collapse

Also, weren’t the US armed forces prevented from going all out in Vietnam?

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 10 Dec 21:38 collapse

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_Program#Torture

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Lai_massacre#Killings

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Orange#Use_in_the_Vie…

Read through that and tell me what we missed.

The American military tried everything just shy of nuking Hanoi. Anyone who tells you otherwise is ignorant or trying to sell you something.

Soviet-sponsored air and naval defenses prevent North Vietnam from being saturation bombarded at the scale we inflicted on North Korea a decade earlier. Americans were largely confined to combat against insurgencies in the South. So much of the war was fought against the civilian population that the Americans were ostensibly there to protect from the villainous Communists.

But the idea that we simply didn’t use enough troops or sufficiently advanced weaponry or brutal tactics… that’s all reactionary mythology. If skinning half the population alive would have won the war, we’d have done it. A far more compelling argument is that Americans alienated the entire peninsula with our “all out” invasion (not unlike how we ended up alienating the bulk of the Afghan population following our '02 invasion). A subtler and more strategic approach - like our efforts to stand up anti-communist governments in The Philippines and Indonesia - seemed to have far better results in hindsight.

dellish@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 09:29 collapse

Are we talking about the same Indonesia where the USA funded and installed a Pro-US puppet government who basically sold out the country to US property development?

I guess that’s better than the country being torn apart by war, but it got torn apart none-the-less.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 15:12 collapse

Are we talking about the same Indonesia where the USA funded and installed a Pro-US puppet government who basically sold out the country to US property development?

The Very Same!

I guess that’s better than the country being torn apart by war, but it got torn apart none-the-less.

It is nearly non-existent in US History textbooks, which is a big fat “W” from the perspective of the capitalist-friendly intelligence services.

Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca on 10 Dec 22:22 next collapse

Actually the US has a shockingly short list of wars they have outright won where they were NOT part of an international coalition.

SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works on 11 Dec 00:45 collapse

VCanada

DarkCloud@lemmy.world on 10 Dec 21:12 next collapse

So… Privateering? Like Royalty.

WanderingThoughts@europe.pub on 10 Dec 21:54 next collapse

Working up to plain ol’ colonization.

ohulancutash@feddit.uk on 11 Dec 21:23 collapse

Can’t be a privateer if they’re not private.

DarkCloud@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 22:07 collapse

I think some privateers were royal navy.

HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world on 10 Dec 21:13 next collapse

Immediately proves what the war is really about

kokesh@lemmy.world on 10 Dec 21:16 next collapse

Oh, so now it is even piracy! Well done tRump, you orange fuck.

[deleted] on 10 Dec 21:22 next collapse
.
toast@retrolemmy.com on 10 Dec 21:22 next collapse

“We’ve just seized a tanker on the coast of Venezuela - a large tanker, very large, the largest one ever seized actually. And other things are happening so you will be seeing that later and you will be talking about that later with other people.”

He speaks like a child, a pernicious little child

FenrirIII@lemmy.world on 10 Dec 23:49 next collapse

He’s got the mind of a 4 year-old

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 11 Dec 06:44 collapse

he is a very stunted elderly man. his supporters are equally adult children too.

Greyghoster@aussie.zone on 10 Dec 21:24 next collapse

And they don’t seize Russian tankers? Wankers!

gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works on 10 Dec 21:27 next collapse

Cool I guess we’re doing piracy now 🤦‍♂️

Chivera@lemmy.world on 10 Dec 21:29 next collapse

So. It begins

karashta@piefed.social on 10 Dec 21:28 next collapse

Oh look we found the drugs they are so interested in!

It’s just the same tired grifts over and over with these people.

Fredselfish@lemmy.world on 10 Dec 21:34 next collapse

How much oil do we truly have left in the world. When I was a kid I heard we would run out of in 2000s. Don’t remember if it was 2030 or 50 could been longer. But just how much?

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 10 Dec 21:44 next collapse

You heard about peak oil, not oil exhaustion. We hit peak extraction around 2008ish but added new extraction technologies like shale oil and since then we have no expectations of hitting a peak extraction any time soon.

Now the expectation is that consumption will hit a peak and collapse oil prices sooner than extraction will hit its peak. This is expected due to electricit cars and green energy production reaching a sufficient volume to make oil less in demand.

WanderingThoughts@europe.pub on 10 Dec 21:57 next collapse

That was the peak for the cheap oil. Now we’re working on the peak for the medium to expensive oil. They kinda blend into each other, but the price at the pump goes up a lot more.

MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 10 Dec 22:01 next collapse

Enough to destroy life on earth if it’s all burnt or turned into plastics. Giant reserves have been discovered in a few places including Antarctica. We didn’t know about these when you or I were kids.

TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works on 10 Dec 22:24 collapse

How much of the world is left if we keep burning oil is the relevant question now. We’ve found lots more

AltheaHunter@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 10 Dec 21:35 next collapse

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/ab01ebc0-8d2d-4d51-a009-1bc8dbdd76cc.webp">

MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world on 10 Dec 22:05 next collapse

Piracy.

Archangel1313@lemmy.ca on 10 Dec 23:07 next collapse

An oil tanker…full of drugs?

AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world on 10 Dec 23:51 next collapse

Take/blow up anything you want with this one simple trick

Agent641@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 00:49 next collapse

Petro-terrorists.

Anything’s ok as long as you ad hyphen terrorist to the person, place or thing.

aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 12 Dec 08:18 collapse

Straight out of the USA wartime playbook!

DylanMc6@lemmy.ml on 12 Dec 08:27 collapse

more like a drug tanker

not_that_guy05@lemmy.world on 10 Dec 23:10 next collapse

So we are Iran now. Lol this country has fallen so low.

Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz on 11 Dec 02:16 next collapse

The time Iran stole a US oil tanker was in response to the US stealing one of their oil tankers.

This is how America has always acted.

ohulancutash@feddit.uk on 11 Dec 21:15 collapse

The US didn’t “steal” it. It executed a european warrant for siezure at the request of the country that had rightful jurisdiction. Iran was just embarrassed that it was only possible due to the crew’s incompetence.

Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz on 12 Dec 02:10 collapse

Oh I forgot, one of America’s vassals said it was OK. That changes everything. Very international rules and order.

FatVegan@leminal.space on 11 Dec 08:46 next collapse

Yes, just now.

Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com on 11 Dec 12:13 collapse

USA does the most USA thing ever

Lemmitors: WHAT ARE WE, BROWN PEOPLE??!!

not_that_guy05@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 15:19 collapse

I like how you went straight for color of people when no one is talking about color.

Good job!! Next time let’s talk about religion as well since you know, fuck it.

SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 10 Dec 23:18 next collapse

Starting a nonsense war under the guise of “spreading democracy” just to take their oil reserves so that rednecks back home can pollute the air and warm the earth with their oversized trucks. Can it get any more American this?

DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Dec 01:32 next collapse

He wants to declare war on Venezuela next year (or hopes that he can agitate them enough to commit an act of terror on the US) so he can deny midterm elections because he knows the GOP majority will potentially be cooked

Remember how much his eyes shifted when he was told that elections can be delayed due to a country being at war

mos@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 01:58 next collapse

Do you have a link to that clip of the shifty eyes?

DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Dec 02:01 collapse

reddit.com/…/trump_to_zelenskyy_during_the_war_yo…

Sorry this was the only place I could find it fast

FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 02:36 next collapse

He’s not 100% wrong.

I’m sure he remembers fondly how every single news network praised him profusely when he dropped the MOAB on Afghanistan.

He knows very well how much the US loves a warmongering president.

bagelberger@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 03:29 next collapse

are you talking about the bunker buster in Iran?

FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 13:31 collapse

No, this was in his first term.

Here’s an article on it: www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-39598046

But yeah, every single news outlet sang his praises after this. I specifically remember being on the treadmill in the gym, watching CNN, and I’ll quote Fareed Zakaria: “In that moment, he became president of the United States.”

This country loves war to the point of absolute absurdity.

Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Dec 09:18 collapse

I’m starting to get the impression that a large fraction of Americans have lustful thoughts at the idea of mass murdering civilians (including children) as well as at the idea of their “leaders” having sex with children.

Theirs is a diseased relationship with power.

FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 13:30 next collapse

We are a nation that really has never given a crap about bombing civilians en masse. Hell, President Obama, whom many still revere, dropped 20,000 bombs just in the last year of his presidency and killed an American citizen in Iraq ordering a bombing as well.

Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Dec 13:38 collapse

At one point President Obama had the definition of “enemy combatant” be changed to “Any man between the ages of 16 and 60” because the numbers of “collateral” civilian casualties from the drone attacks he ordered were so bad.

FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 13:58 collapse

Yup. Obama loved bloodying his hands almost as much as Donald Trump and Joe Biden.

100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it on 12 Dec 06:11 collapse

It’s not like the Pilgrim Fathers weren’t a bunch of religious nutjobs

n0respect@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 05:16 next collapse

Remember

It looked like he thought no one had ever thought of it before, and that he was a genius.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 11 Dec 06:44 collapse

same tactic bush used to get elected, make a ware gives brownie points to the election in thier favor.

elbarto777@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 07:10 next collapse

Can it get any more American this?

Yes. Yes, it can.

Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Dec 09:11 collapse

Tradition!

molestme247@lemmy.world on 10 Dec 23:19 next collapse

Jesus Christ trump fie already you old fuck

DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Dec 01:32 collapse

D I E

n0respect@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 05:21 collapse

Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity. they will get as much as they give others.

ProfThadBach@lemmy.world on 10 Dec 23:39 next collapse

What the man. What the fuck are we doing?

Agent641@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 00:50 next collapse

This is not at all like America. I’m quite shocked, really.

Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com on 11 Dec 12:15 collapse

Missing an /s?

Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com on 11 Dec 12:17 next collapse

This is what the USA has done for its entire history, bullying oil-rich countries that don’t submit to US imperialism

DylanMc6@lemmy.ml on 12 Dec 08:28 collapse

if the us were a socialist country, we WOULDN’T rely on imperialism so much. seriously!

clot27@lemmy.zip on 11 Dec 18:28 collapse

You did it in iraq already

Why are americans surprised witht his? Also why isnt the american left on streets yet against this iraq war 2.0?

neuromorph@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 00:02 next collapse

So what determines if oil is being used by terrorists? Hella vague

captainlezbian@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 00:06 next collapse

Whelp that’s a casus belli…

ohulancutash@feddit.uk on 11 Dec 21:23 collapse

Ship siezures are not, under international law.

almost1337@lemmy.zip on 11 Dec 00:15 next collapse

According to the NY Times the tanker in question is flying under a flag where it is not registered, and is linked to smuggling Iranian oil.

Maggoty@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 00:39 next collapse

The problem is Trump has no credibility. Nobody is going to believe it.

VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 11 Dec 00:54 collapse

The US has no credibility, from the USS Maine to the Gulf of Tonkin to this

almost1337@lemmy.zip on 11 Dec 01:12 collapse

True enough, but the ghost fleets of oil tankers and ocean fishing vessels are a real problem as well. I would say that I find it unlikely that this administration would go out of their way to do the paperwork for possibly legal targets when they’ve been so ruthlessly attacking non-legit targets, but the stakes are also higher with the monetary value of the oil.

skisnow@lemmy.ca on 11 Dec 02:15 next collapse

The phrase “is linked to” should be a massive red flag.

If it was smuggling Iranian oil it would say, “is smuggling Iranian oil”, not “is linked to smuggling Iranian oil”.

Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Dec 09:32 next collapse

Also all lots of “may” and “[unnamed] American official claimed” in the article.

The whole thing reads as Propaganda, which makes sense given that we’re talking about the pro-Zionist New York Times (which also has a long history of backing American warmongering in, for example Iraq) - morally a little propagandizing to whitewash American Administration’s piracy on the high-seas is nothing compared to relentlessly providing cover and support for the active mass murdering of Palestinian children in Gaza for more than a year.

The Pravda in the days of the Soviet Union had more truth than this Propaganda Outlet.

drmoose@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 15:18 collapse

The ship was already sanctioned in 2022 tho

Philippe23@lemmy.ca on 11 Dec 02:54 next collapse

So is the US going to start seizing all the Russia ghost tankers doing the same?

almost1337@lemmy.zip on 11 Dec 03:10 next collapse

The Chinese ghost fishing fleet too, imo

drmoose@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 15:17 collapse

Yes, they should but Ukraine’s drones are already on it.

W3dd1e@lemmy.zip on 11 Dec 06:28 next collapse

Did they say why Venezuela would smuggle Iranian oil? I thought it was an oil rich country? I didn’t see it in the article. Maybe I missed it.

MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca on 11 Dec 08:30 next collapse

If so, that would be a money laundering thing where they relabel the oil as from them to avoid sanctions on iran oil export.

W3dd1e@lemmy.zip on 11 Dec 16:13 collapse

Okay yeah that makes sense. I didn’t think of that.

ohulancutash@feddit.uk on 11 Dec 21:20 collapse

Venezuela wants to sell oil, but is under sanctions. Iran wants to buy oil, but is under sanctions.

W3dd1e@lemmy.zip on 11 Dec 21:52 collapse

That makes sense. I was thinking Iran probably had oil too, but I don’t know enough about their imports/exports.

ohulancutash@feddit.uk on 12 Dec 00:40 collapse

Iran has the second-largest reserves in the world. However production is limited by ageing infrastructure and sanctions. It is also the second-largest oil consumer, as the cheap cost has meant there has been no incentive for efficient use.

Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com on 11 Dec 12:14 next collapse

Why are you quoting Israeli propaganda? The New York Crimes has lost all its credibility with the constant support of genocide in Palestine

theacharnian@lemmy.ca on 11 Dec 13:20 next collapse

Lol yea, of course, the USA cares about breaking international law.

clot27@lemmy.zip on 11 Dec 18:26 collapse

Fuck the new york times, fucking imperialist propaganda outlet

theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Dec 00:32 next collapse

Not putting to bed accusations about motives at all the opposite really.

CircaV@lemmy.ca on 11 Dec 03:02 next collapse

Shame. Also fuck you Amerikkka!

Psythik@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 03:28 next collapse

Well at least we know the real reason for the murders now. Why it it always the most greedy, predictable cause?

aesthelete@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 05:25 collapse

Dude has been saying for 20 years that we should’ve stolen Iraq’s oil. Yet somehow everyone acts surprised when he does pretty predictable things like this.

ohlaph@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 03:49 next collapse

Sigh… That’s not good…

LemmyBruceLeeMarvin@lemmy.ml on 11 Dec 03:51 next collapse

VERY COOL AND LEGAL

cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca on 11 Dec 05:32 next collapse

Why didn’t they just bomb it?

MeThisGuy@feddit.nl on 11 Dec 06:00 next collapse

big badaboom

Hupf@feddit.org on 11 Dec 06:12 next collapse

We need to protect the innocent oil on board at all cost

D_C@sh.itjust.works on 11 Dec 09:56 collapse

If you want the orange child rapist to bomb something then first you need to put an innocent fisherman on it.

It doesn’t matter what it is. It could be a fishing boat, a lawn chair, or a baby’s bed. As long as there’s an innocent fisherman nearby he’ll bomb the fuck out of it. Then declare it as very legal and very tremendous.

Mvlad88@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 06:03 next collapse

So piracy?

[deleted] on 12 Dec 08:17 collapse
.
DylanMc6@lemmy.ml on 11 Dec 06:53 next collapse

venezuela (regardless of whether their citizens support maduro or NOT) should fight back. seriously!

andros_rex@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 07:05 next collapse

Their far right, including the woman won a Nobel peace prize, are explicitly pro the U.S. attacking Venezuela to overthrow Maduro.

DylanMc6@lemmy.ml on 11 Dec 07:08 collapse

if venezuela’s an aes country (think vietnam combined with nepal (which is NOT an aes country, but has socialist political parties), they would’ve fought back (and they should). seriously!

elbarto777@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 07:09 collapse

No. Fuck that. Let’s put it this way: American people should fight against this illegal war, regardless of whether they support Trump or not. They’re 10X the size of the Venezuelan population.

Now tell me. Is that fair now?

DylanMc6@lemmy.ml on 11 Dec 06:53 next collapse

we need to organize a bit harder, everyone. seriously!

elbarto777@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 07:07 next collapse

Organize against what, exactly?

The way I see it, it’s two assholes fighting. Both suck and are responsible of crisis and death of their own country people. Let them fight, then. Though I know Venezuela doesn’t stand a chance, unfortunately.

DylanMc6@lemmy.ml on 11 Dec 07:09 next collapse

would there a marxist revolution against both maduro and trump in venezuela? NOT repeating any US state department talking points (looking at you, hexbear!), just asking. seriously!

Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com on 11 Dec 12:10 collapse

Why would there be a Marxist revolution in Venezuela if they already have a Bolivarian revolution going on? Venezuela is an extremely grassroots country, more than 10% of the state budget is allocated to local committees to spend however they democratically desire from what I gather. Tens of thousands of Venezuelans are actually enlisting as volunteers this past month to the country’s militias to defend the country from possible American invasion.

foenkyfjutschah@programming.dev on 11 Dec 07:27 next collapse

you’re aware who does the actual fighting and whom the bombs will be raining on??

echodot@feddit.uk on 11 Dec 09:21 next collapse

Ah yes you are displaying the kind of intelligence the US military favours in its recruits. Non at all.

Apytele@sh.itjust.works on 11 Dec 10:20 collapse

I won’t say my grammar is perfect, but I do try not to misspell things and insult other people’s intelligence at the same time.

echodot@feddit.uk on 12 Dec 13:10 collapse

You seem to be under the deluded impression that a war between two people only affects those two people, so yeah I’m insulting your intelligence. Do you even know what a war is, I know that’s a stupid question but I’m seriously asking because it sounds like you don’t?

n4ch1sm0@lemmy.zip on 11 Dec 13:08 next collapse

Replying to your shit take as soap box to answer your question and remind everyone that one the things we should be organizing is a GENERAL STRIKE

GeneralStrikeUS.com

Congratulations to Portugal for committing to a GENERAL STRIKE and gaining massive leverage: reuters.com/…/portugal-general-strike-stalls-tran…

DylanMc6@lemmy.ml on 11 Dec 22:17 collapse

do you think i’m a sh*tlib who thinks biden should’ve gotten re-elected? NOT assuming anyone, just asking. seriously!

jj4211@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 20:30 next collapse

Whatever the situation is in Venezula, it’s not going to be a good thing for America to get entangled.

Hussein was a pretty bad dude, but our intervention in Iraq ultimately was bad for America and didn’t exactly make things in Iraq better.

demonsword@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 22:05 collapse

It wouldn’t be a fight, it would be a massacre. Untold thousands dead, millions of refugees. Knowing this, how could you possibly wish for it?

fossilesque@mander.xyz on 11 Dec 14:49 next collapse

You all are sleep walking into another forever war nobody wants. I implore everyone to read your own and Latin American history from the last 50 years. It’s not taught.

read.dukeupress.edu/…/The-School-of-the-AmericasM… (Ask Anna for a copy.)

Venezuela

Name: Army Commander in Chief Efrain Vasquez and General Ramirez Poveda

Country: Venezuela

Dates/courses: Attended the SOA in 1988; 1972

Info: Both Vasquez and Poveda helped to lead a failed coup in Venezuela in April of 2002, despite supposedly receiving training at the SOA that encourages respect for democracy and civilian governments. Otto Reich, then Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, shared his support for the coup and a new government, and in the same year was appointed as a WHINSEC Board of Visitor member to “oversee” democracy and human rights curriculum, as well as operations at the school. Reich met with these SOA graduates prior to the coup and advised business leader Pedro Carmona, who subsequently seized the presidency.

Name: General Ramon Davila Guillen

Country: Venezuela

Dates/courses: Attended the SOA in 1967 for Irregular Warfare training

Info: General Guillen was indicted in November 1996 in connection with a shipment of one ton of cocaine into Miami in 1990, which he says was authorized by the CIA in an effort to catch drug dealers. In 1993, the CIA called the shipment “a regrettable incident” and dismissed the CIA agent involved. (CAP, 9/21/97)

soaw.org/notorious-soa-graduates

DylanMc6@lemmy.ml on 11 Dec 22:18 collapse

do you think i should study a bit more socialist theory, and is there any way i can study in layperson’s terms without losing focus quickly?

fossilesque@mander.xyz on 12 Dec 02:48 next collapse

No, I read that book (The School of the Americas by Leslie Gill) before I knew what socialism was in a Political Theory of Latin America class. It radicalized me and I have used it to radicalize ex military confused libertarians and liberals. It is good without theory, it is pure history. If you read enough history, you can passively get theory via trends and vice versa. That is ultimately what they discuss anyway if the author is decent, via materialist analysis (though that obviously brings its own problems). I am happy to send audio and pdfs as needed to whomever. I am not sure if there is an audiobook of this one, but I am due a refresher regardless.

DylanMc6@lemmy.ml on 12 Dec 05:08 collapse

like i wanna study for socialist theory, but there’s something about it makes my head spin. do you have any tips on “studying in layperson’s terms”?

fossilesque@mander.xyz on 12 Dec 05:11 collapse

Listen to that voice and read this: theanarchistlibrary.org/…/russell-means-for-ameri… That voice is telling you something very real and important. Trust yourself.

DylanMc6@lemmy.ml on 12 Dec 05:28 collapse

i mean the text - i’ve heard of a study method which taking long paragraphs and boiling them down into very short ones. however, sometimes i CAN’T find the right words to a point where i prefer NOT to say anything. do you have any tips?

fossilesque@mander.xyz on 12 Dec 05:32 collapse

To summarise the text I attached… Trust the resistance. If it feels like you are forcing something that doesn’t fit, that is probably what you are doing. What are you actually trying to learn? Not “study theory” but what do you want to understand?

DylanMc6@lemmy.ml on 12 Dec 05:34 collapse

learning about socialism and studying it without losing focus quickly or having my head spin. seriously!

fossilesque@mander.xyz on 12 Dec 05:42 collapse

You keep asking “how do I get better at the thing that doesn’t work for me” and I am saying “stop doing the thing because it isn’t the only or ‘correct’ way of doing things," not that there is a correct way. You aren’t asking the right questions or starting with questions if you are stuck here. Start figuring you what you want to know.

DylanMc6@lemmy.ml on 12 Dec 05:47 collapse

what do you mean by that?

fossilesque@mander.xyz on 12 Dec 05:53 collapse

You keep asking me: “How do I study theory better?” But, theory, as you say, makes your head spin. You lose focus. You can’t find words to summarize it. So my question back is: Why are you trying to force yourself to study theory? What do you actually want to understand? Not “I want to study socialism,” because socialism itself is just a method. Socialism is a tool, not an answer. A hammer without a nail. What questions do you have? What do you want to know about the world? What problems do you care about and want to solve? What do you care about and why? Once you know what you want to understand, learning becomes effortless.

ps: always happy to soundboard :)

[deleted] on 12 Dec 03:38 collapse
.
DylanMc6@lemmy.ml on 11 Dec 22:17 collapse

does anyone think i should study a bit more on socialist theory, and is there any way i can study in layperson’s terms without losing focus?

Matombo@feddit.org on 11 Dec 09:53 next collapse

So who had written “blatent piracy” on his trump bingo card at the beginning of the year? He took almost to the very end to also make you cross out this, but he did.

So, “nuclear test und an uninhabited island” next?

Restform@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 10:20 next collapse

Boarding ships & enforcing sanctions is not necessarily a bad thing, albeit im missing details on this specific case.

France & Finland have both done this to shadow fleet tankers in recent time as well.

Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com on 11 Dec 12:05 next collapse

Go home with your Russian propaganda, Ivan

Restform@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 12:36 collapse

wtf? Finland & France siezed Russian shadow fleet tankers, an aggressive act against the Putin regime. This vessel is also related to the axis shadow fleet.

Supporting these shadow fleet oil tankers breaking sanctions & financing illegal wars is literally pro-russian. Seizing them is literally an act of aggression AGAINST Russia. You have it completely backwards.

And this tanker was anyway sanctioned by Biden, Trump is now enforcing the biden administration’s sanctions.

Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com on 11 Dec 12:40 next collapse

Sure, supporting Agent Krasnov’s military policy that will push it further from the EU, good try Ваня

Restform@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 12:44 collapse

You didn’t address anything I said. Enforcing Biden’s sanctions against Iran/Russia/NK is not pushing anyone further from the EU. The EU has literally sanctioned the Maduro government, and Norway is currently protecting the Venezuelan opposition party.

Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz on 12 Dec 04:19 collapse

Enforcing Biden’s sanctions against Iran/Russia/NK is not pushing anyone further from the EU

I mean you are broadcasting that the US determines your foreign policy, whether that’s attractive or not depends on whether a leader’s interests are more closely aligned with America’s or the European unit as a whole.

bold_atlas@lemmy.world on 12 Dec 15:23 collapse
  • Finland and France aren’t trying to start war when they impound and seize ships.
  • Finland and France aren’t actively terrorizing international waters, destroying civilian pleasure craft, and massacring defenseless people.
  • Finland and France are democratic countries that adhere to international law whereas the the US is a Nazi rogue state.
melsaskca@lemmy.ca on 11 Dec 12:22 collapse

It’s always best to make comments like this when you are missing details. /s

Restform@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 12:39 collapse

I only said that becasue we’re ALL missing context. The shadow fleet tankers siezed by Europe happened months ago and we have a lot more context. But I left my comment intentionally open-ended incase more context comes out later.

For now, all we know is the Trump administration seized a shadow fleet tanker that was sanctioned by the Biden administration, thereby inforcing decisions made by Biden. Europe has done the same. If you would like to add some meaningful context then please do, it’s an interesting topic.

jj4211@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 20:23 collapse

Yes, indeed, it’s open ended and on the surface it is consistent with a plausible follow through on existing decision.

Though the prospect of suspiciously selective enforcement comes to mind, in the midst of this very specific scenario they decide to execute a seizure that is conveniently adjacent to the boat strike operations.

GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca on 11 Dec 16:26 next collapse

So, “nuclear test und an uninhibited island” next?

Un inhabited?

Edit: apparently you can’t have partial words italicized.

Matombo@feddit.org on 11 Dec 19:38 collapse

oh please don’t jinx it more then i do

VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 20:57 collapse

We’ll be lucky if it’s anywhere uninhabited.

We all know he desperately wants to use the nukes for any reason he can come up with. It’s only a matter of time.

Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz on 12 Dec 07:03 collapse

It might be the only way to get a boner now when he can’t go to the Epstein’s island anymore.

Treczoks@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 11:16 next collapse

Time to determine on who’s command this was done, and follow down the complete chain to the bottom.

viking@infosec.pub on 11 Dec 11:44 next collapse

Why? The one giving the order on the top is ultimately responsible. Insubordination against king Donald of Orange the First will probably get you court martialed and hanged…

Treczoks@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 12:06 next collapse

Following illegal commands is no legal protection. See: Nuremberg trials.

ohulancutash@feddit.uk on 11 Dec 20:35 next collapse

Yes it is. See: Vietnam

0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 12 Dec 06:49 collapse

See: Operation Paperclip

See: Ratlines

See: US Army last 5 decades

mPony@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 12:15 collapse

not the point, though. The Cowards are using him as a shield. They have been for years. They are every bit as much to blame as he is (and he absolutely is to blame, just not the only one). Once this all falls apart they will say it was all his idea and blame him for everything, to avoid criminal repercussions. People will be so happy to see the king fall that they will give all of The Cowards immunity just to get rid of him, and the cycle will continue.

I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 13:12 collapse

And do what exactly? They aren’t going to get punished for it, so what’s the fucking point?

FatVegan@leminal.space on 11 Dec 14:04 collapse

To give them a medal of course

MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip on 11 Dec 11:32 next collapse

seize abduct

WanderWisley@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 11:41 next collapse

The tanker was full of fentanOIL…

itisileclerk@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 11:57 next collapse

USA turns into Taliban country. Taliban originaly is “political and militant organization with an ideology comprising elements of the Deobandi movement of Islamic fundamentalism and Pashtun nationalism”, now is just “political and militant organization with an ideology comprising elements of the MAGA movement of Evangelical fundamentalism and WASP nationalism”

Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com on 11 Dec 12:03 next collapse

USA doing the most USA thing possible

Lemmitor: WHAT ARE WE, A BUNCH OF MUSLIMS?!!

itisileclerk@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 12:09 next collapse
EightLeggedFreak@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 19:58 collapse

Lemmings

Digit@lemmy.wtf on 11 Dec 18:37 next collapse

Taliban

Remember when the CIA funded and armed what became the Taliban?

Remember when the CIA had their guy running the Taliban?

LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 21:28 collapse

Who was there guy that ran it? Never heard that one before.

MehBlah@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 22:16 next collapse

Tom Hanks.

Digit@lemmy.wtf on 12 Dec 10:20 collapse

Oh, maybe I’m conflating the Taliban with Al-Qaeda a bit (and [for the next part of this] maybe even ISIS too a bit? idk) ~ I’m no Whitney Webb for this stuff, so do use several websearch engines likely to be honest about this stuff for yourself, but…

Tim Osman? (Whom you may know by another name.)

Then after that there was that guy they once called a terrorist, then put a suit on and invited to the white house… I’m terrible with names… was it… Ahmed al-Sharaa/Abu Mohammad al-Julani?

Hard to keep track if not paying close attention.

Hard to keep paying close attention after seeing the same old ploys and fakery played out over and over.

“Pick up the gun”

“You all saw him. He had a gun.”

P1k1e@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 20:15 collapse

Y’all Queda

clot27@lemmy.zip on 11 Dec 12:21 next collapse

Fucking terrorist country

nuko147@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 12:46 next collapse

Remember, USA is against piracy lmao

blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Dec 12:53 next collapse

It’s an oily amuse bouche before the land invasion

drmoose@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 15:15 next collapse

I hate trump as anyone else here but reading into this it looks like an absolutely legal and normal procedure?

The ship in question named Skipper was already sanctioned since 2022 for transporting Iranian oil to fund Hezbolah. So minus conflict escalation with Venezuela this seems like a good thing? Hezbolah is an incredibly evil terrorist organization and cutting off it’s funding is good.

Furbag@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 15:31 next collapse

I’m not typically a betting man, but I would be willing to go all in on that not being the reason they seized the ship.

This administration tends to do what comes natural to them first (do illegal shit) and then search for an excuse later for why it was necessary when confronted about it.

I wouldn’t be surprised if they eventually came to the same conclusion that you did, but only after Trump or one of his stooges brags about doing it for other reasons.

drmoose@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 18:03 collapse

I feel like people are taking the bait here in siding with Iran and Hezbolah just to spite Trump. Both things can be bad and it’s kinda important to be woke to these games rather than blindly oppose everything.

People keep underestimating Trump and his stooges. Sure they are stupid but they do have a plan and they do scheme.

Furbag@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 18:04 collapse

Fair enough.

radiofreebc@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 15:45 next collapse

Sanctioned by the US. This means the ship is free to trade with other countries. It wasn’t heading to the US. This is an illegal act.

drmoose@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 18:12 collapse

That’s not how these types sanctions work though. It’s much more broad than “you can’t pass our waters” and it’s perfectly legal to board sanctioned ships in international waters.

AFAIK this is legal though I care much more about ethics than legalities as citizen of neither of these countries.

ohulancutash@feddit.uk on 11 Dec 21:07 collapse

Unless it’s by the state it was registered in, it is not legal to do so, except in cases of piracy, slave transport, or when the ship is stateless.

titanicx@lemmy.zip on 11 Dec 16:46 next collapse

Sure seems like you read a lot of Israeli propaganda there.

rhamzeh@lemmy.ml on 11 Dec 17:07 next collapse

“Hezbolah is an incredibly evil terrorist organization”

Based on? What metric are you using for this? Or do we kill people based on your genocidal white vibes?

Or is it “that’s what I hear on CNN and Fox who tell me that Saddam’s WMD’s are about to be definitely foubd any second now?”

drmoose@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 18:13 collapse

Lol only on lemmy.megalosers you can find Hezbolah defenders. Go away troll.

desertdruid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 11 Dec 18:02 collapse

How it is legal to seize a ship from another country when it isn’t even close to your coast? Are you so brainwashed you can call this normal?

drmoose@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 18:26 next collapse

I’m not a lawyer but afaik the sanctioned ships are treated kinda like “legal piracy” as country can board it even in international waters if it knows it’s performing a sanctioned operation like transferring goods to a place it’s not allowed to or the ship is stateless or sneaky (no transponder etc).

At the end of the day these legalities are purely made up to satisfy treaties rather than ethics or rationality so it’s silly to try to look for rational meaning here.

ohulancutash@feddit.uk on 11 Dec 21:03 collapse

The law holds that states cannot commit piracy. That is solely a crime for private entities.

Ships can only fall under the jurisdiction of the country of registration, the country in whose coastal waters the ship is in, or - in exceptional circumstances of piracy, slavery or statelessness of the ship - anyone.

drmoose@lemmy.world on 12 Dec 01:59 collapse

No that’s simply not true

ohulancutash@feddit.uk on 11 Dec 21:01 collapse

Usually it wouldn’t be, but there are exceptions for piracy and slaving. There is also an exception for vessels without nationality. Skipper had been fraudulently flying the flag of Guyana, who confirmed no such ship exists on their register. The US could argue it was therefore stateless.

Bababasti@feddit.org on 11 Dec 19:49 next collapse

<img alt="" src="https://feddit.org/pictrs/image/11f230db-1d8f-4e12-b154-c6696c5e63b8.jpeg">

It’s time to hit the button again

CummandoX@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 20:34 next collapse

2 two things america likes most: oil and drugs. No wonder they had to do it

kieron115@startrek.website on 11 Dec 21:25 next collapse

Might not be able to buy groceries but at least we have $3.00/gallon, or $0.80/liter, fuel for our planet destroying pickup trucks!

aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 12 Dec 08:14 collapse

80c/L is cheap. It’s sometimes 1.80$/L here

kieron115@startrek.website on 12 Dec 14:04 collapse

Right, that’s what I’m saying. We have cheap gas/petrol but food prices here are skyrocketing.

Gammelfisch@lemmy.world on 11 Dec 22:09 next collapse

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, the USA has stooped to the same low level as the Somali Pirates.

sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Dec 22:23 next collapse

US Navy in the Red Sea:

We are conducting freedom of movement and trade, anti piracy operations.

US Coast Guard in the Caribbean:

Look at me, look at me.

I am the pirate now.

DylanMc6@lemmy.ml on 12 Dec 08:27 collapse

true pirates get drunk off rum and find treasure

muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works on 11 Dec 22:33 next collapse

In another timeline, Hegseth confusingly bombed the oil tanker and blamed Biden.

KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org on 12 Dec 05:34 next collapse

Now we get to the meat of the matter.

The arabs hire trump muscle to knock off the Venezuelan government putting the arabs in charge, this gives the arabs unlimited unrestricted gulf drilling access.

The Saudis have run out or are almost out of oil. They like making billions for doing nothing and do not want the big bucks to stop.

So the gulf is drilled unrestricted, the oil shipped up to east Houston refineries, then shipped out to the nations paying the most for it.

What a deal.

When will trump start working for Americans?

Treczoks@lemmy.world on 12 Dec 06:55 next collapse

Next time Iran or the Houtis steal a tanker, they can point at the US and smile.

aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 12 Dec 08:12 collapse

Nah. The US can do what they want, but don’t those other countries DARE fall out of line. That’s why the Ukraine was forced to give up nukes, but the USA is fine to keep theirs

DylanMc6@lemmy.ml on 12 Dec 08:29 next collapse

what should venezuela do?

HereIAm@lemmy.world on 12 Dec 08:37 next collapse

I don’t think there is much they can do. No one is going to want to stand up against the US in this, and any escalation from Venezuela would be incredibly costly for them. I suppose there are two things they can hope for; hope the US population throws up enough of a stink the trump changes his mind or wait for something else to come around to occupy his attention.

grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one on 12 Dec 15:05 collapse

resist

sturmblast@lemmy.world on 12 Dec 13:21 next collapse

USA Piracy

[deleted] on 12 Dec 14:59 collapse
.