1 crew member rescued, search underway for another as 2 U.S. military jets downed in Iran (www.cbc.ca)
from Quilotoa@lemmy.ca to world@lemmy.world on 04 Apr 11:17
https://lemmy.ca/post/62827854

#world

threaded - newest

SARGE@startrek.website on 04 Apr 14:01 next collapse

As former enlisted, I wonder if at any point while floating to the ground they thought to themselves “holy shit, I’m gonna die in a desert for pedophiles, why did I go along with this?”

At least one gets to think twice for now, but I doubt they will.

GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone on 04 Apr 14:03 collapse

why did I go along with this?

Because you have to pay back all the tuition money you got from ROTC if you don’t hold up your end of the bargain.

ramble81@lemmy.zip on 04 Apr 17:16 collapse

Or what? You’ll become a slave that has to follow orders and be sent to your death?

voaw@lemmy.world on 04 Apr 14:44 next collapse

FAFO

riskable@programming.dev on 04 Apr 15:34 next collapse

Why are we still flying jets with human pilots? Surely, drones are cheaper and better these days?

frongt@lemmy.zip on 04 Apr 17:21 collapse

Cheaper, yes. But they can’t handle dynamic and unexpected situations on their own. They’d need a remote operator for that, which means time delay, when millisecond decisions count.

For example, say you send a drone to strike what intelligence tells you is a single outpost. Easy. What if it gets there, and there are three outposts? Or no outpost? Or there’s a significantly more valuable target right nearby that day? Or intelligence tells you they have to anti-air capability, but when your drone enters the area, you start taking anti-air fire? Or worse, an enemy fighter jet patrol?

riskable@programming.dev on 04 Apr 20:41 collapse

For the cost of a single plane and a pilot you could send one thousand drones, though. Surely that would make up for the limitations?

[deleted] on 04 Apr 16:20 collapse
.