Live updates: Trump announces sweeping tariffs (apnews.com)
from RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to world@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 20:36
https://lemmy.ca/post/41675354

Among the reciprocal tariff levels Trump announced:

China: 34%

European Union: 20%

South Korea: 25%

India: 26%

Vietnam: 46%

Taiwan: 32%

Japan: 24%

Thailand: 36%

Switzerland: 31%

Indonesia: 32%

Malaysia: 24%

Cambodia: 49%

United Kingdom: 10%

Rest of the world: 10%

#world

threaded - newest

RandAlThor@lemmy.ca on 02 Apr 20:38 next collapse

Cambodia and Vietnam are so fucked. All the Chinese companies shifting production to Vietnam and Cambodia are fucked. Damn. These are very high tariffs.

AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today on 02 Apr 20:52 collapse

Most of all, the US is fucked.

flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz on 02 Apr 20:39 next collapse

Is he using a random number generator?

Quill7513@slrpnk.net on 02 Apr 20:55 next collapse

bamboozle them with bullshit

Gigasser@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 08:44 collapse

Imma just post this video here: youtu.be/5RpPTRcz1no

What the current administration is doing tracks with this video fairly accurately. Basically, “Network States” are what they want. It’s basically what exists in Honduras right now in the form of "Prospera, which is a network state that operates in that country.

catloaf@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 21:04 next collapse

It’s probably like his net worth, where “it goes up and down with the markets and with attitudes and with feelings”, “even my own feelings, as to where the world is, where the world is going, and that can change rapidly from day to day”.

money.cnn.com/2011/04/21/news/…/index.htm

CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 21:06 next collapse

No, it’s half the tariff those countries place on American goods. Or so he claims. I have no idea where those numbers come from.

warm@kbin.earth on 02 Apr 21:08 collapse

He doesn't understand what VAT is.

CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 21:36 collapse

He doesn’t understand anything. Here’s what he said about income taxes and tariffs today.

They established the income tax so that citizens, rather than foreign countries, would start paying the money necessary to run our government

aesthelete@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 22:00 next collapse

That’s one of the stupidest things I’ve ever read.

SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 00:41 next collapse

That’s probably why you’re not the president.

whatyousaidontwitter@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 01:02 next collapse

So far*

anomnom@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 01:57 collapse

Today

Ledericas@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 02:27 collapse

by the way that was his first presidency too, he did the same thing.

DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org on 03 Apr 03:35 collapse

And, for wrecking their business, had to bail the farmers out with the tariff money lol

catloaf@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 22:02 next collapse

I’m not sure that that’s necessarily wrong. Excise taxes, import duties, etc. have been around for millennia. In the US, the income tax has only been around since the Civil War (which it was created to pay for).

youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 22:27 next collapse

Taxes on citizens have always been used to run the government those citizens live under. Doesn’t matter if it’s base on income or something else.

The only way to make other countries pay for your government to operate is to invade them and steal all of their resources… like Hitler did.

It’s really not worth trying to make sense of anything this guy says. He is the definition of a bullshitter.

aesthelete@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 22:32 next collapse

Why would someone run a business exporting goods into a country if they couldn’t charge more than the cost of duties, labor, and materials for the goods?

SupahRevs@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 23:37 collapse

Don’t forget land sales tax which happened a lot after the Louisiana Purchase and the Gold Rush.

x00z@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 22:20 collapse

LOL.

KingGordon@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 21:24 next collapse

Like he would even know what that is.

467265654C75696769@sh.itjust.works on 02 Apr 23:35 next collapse

The following quote from ChrisO_wiki on bsky

“@chriso-wiki.bsky.social Just figured out where these fake tariff rates come from. They didn’t actually calculate tariff rates + non-tariff barriers, as they say they did. Instead, for every country, they just took our trade deficit with that country and divided it by the country’s exports to us.” Just about sums it up.

Tikiporch@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 00:55 collapse

Damn, I’d like to see the data on that.

467265654C75696769@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 01:05 collapse
takeda@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 18:54 collapse

Apparently ChatGPT.

thejml@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 20:44 next collapse

A lot of people’s lives are about to get more expensive… again.

<butterfly meme> Is this winning?

RandAlThor@lemmy.ca on 02 Apr 20:52 next collapse

China and Vietnam are producing a lot of the low cost every day items people use. It’s going to hit the lower income people the hardest. Thank goodness I’m in Canada.

ThePantser@sh.itjust.works on 02 Apr 22:10 next collapse

Timu: shop like a billionaire because only billionaires can afford the cheap Chinese garbage.

freebee@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 08:39 collapse

Shit might hit the fan harder and faster in USA, but don’t be fooled: Canada and every other country in the world will be gravely affected: less trade, prices inflate, some goods become hard to find at all at any price, etc. US $ after all is the big reserve currency and all international trade was de facto protected by US military hegemony. Probably countries like North Korea or Iran will see least influence from all this… It’s insane to watch this happening. Their main goal really just seems to be to create chaos. And from chaos… rises whatever authoritarian state they want to create after declaring some state of emergency shit and after the superwealthy gobbled up all the failing companies at bargain prices. It’s like they’re organising a reenactment of the “shock therapy” that crashed the Russian economy on a speedrun after the soviet union fell apart.

Rhaedas@fedia.io on 02 Apr 20:56 next collapse

You're going to get tired of winning tariffs.

cosmicrookie@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 21:06 next collapse

Mainly American people’s lives. He’s basically making everything more expensive in USA that is not made in USA, but most things made in USA are dependent on imported parts, fertilizers, components, raw materials etc… This is going to be a mess to witness

pleasegoaway@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 00:55 next collapse

The trump regime was designed to TANK the US economy so that stocks, businesses, and industries can be bought by billionaires at rock bottom prices.

All is going according to plan.

AJ1@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 01:13 collapse

um, yeah. we heard you the first 5 times, why do you keep reposting the same comment over and over?

Fingolfinz@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 02:21 collapse

It’s winning for magats because they wanted to hurt people

ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com on 02 Apr 20:45 next collapse

They’ll be reverted as soon as he gets some flattery and palm greasing from the right people.

floo@retrolemmy.com on 02 Apr 20:58 next collapse

That’s all this was about anyway

Wytch@lemmy.zip on 02 Apr 21:08 next collapse

And we’ll know exactly which countries bought him off

monarch@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 01:37 collapse

I can only hope so.

NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 20:46 next collapse

I mean, this will suck in rhe short term, but these companies will exit the U.S. market if it gets to be uneconomical, and we’ll be fucked, not them. Trump’s I Am sO sMaRt comments all the time will make him look like an even bigger idiot than he already does.

If we actually want manufacturing in the U.S., give companies incentives to do business here. This is the opposite of incentives.

krashmo@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 20:57 next collapse

What is looking like more of an idiot than he already does going to accomplish? He’s the most idiotic politician in living memory, by far, and there are some absolutely colossal morons on that list. The people who haven’t figured that out are never going to. They will be praising him until the day they die.

tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works on 02 Apr 21:22 next collapse

Never underestimate the destruction that stupid people in position of power can do.

RoundSparrow@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 22:21 collapse

What is looking like more of an idiot than he already does going to accomplish? He’s the most idiotic politician in living memory, by far, and there are some absolutely colossal morons on that list.

He is a Reality TV star. People can not resist mocking Donald Trump. Mocking isn’t resisting, mockery is all part of the Kremlin media techniques. The more idiotic he and Elin Musk behaves, the more people rush to their social machines and LOL. People can not resist his orange skin color, it makes skin color a constant topic (brown, black, white, orange, etc).

Introduction to the Kremlin media techniques of year 2014

  1. Peter Pomerantsev September 9, 2014: Russia and the Menace of Unreality. How Vladimir Putin is revolutionizing information warfare

  2. Adam Curtis, BBC, December 31, 2014: On The “Contradictory Vaudeville” Of Post-Modern Politics - “What this film is going to suggest is that that defeatist response has become a central part of a new system of political control. And to understand how this is happening, you have to look to Russia, to a man called Vladislav Surkov, who is a hero of our time. Surkov is one of President Putin’s advisers, and has helped him maintain his power for 15 years, but he has done it in a very new way.”

  3. Book reading from December 5, 2014 on the subject by Peter Pomerantsev

NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip on 02 Apr 20:58 next collapse

It isn’t quite that easy.

The US is a MASSIVE part of basically every luxury industry and isn’t insignificant in many others. So while alternate trading partners can be found to handle stuff like lumber, plenty of industries are going to be hit real hard and not have alternative customers. And they aren’t going to just want to lower their profits for national pride.

But yeah. I REALLY hope trump is just actively destroying the US either in the name of putin or just out of anger and spite over not winning in 2020. Because the alternative is that we are all going to suffer so fucking much because that piece of shit doesn’t understand what tariffs are.

Renohren@lemmy.today on 02 Apr 21:36 next collapse

Luxury goods are not really hit by tariffs nor taxes the same way more basic goods might be. A $ 4000 that goes to $ 4 500 is way more manageable for the kind of people who want to and can buy it (it may even make it more desirable for those who want and can’t buy it).

RoundSparrow@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 22:18 collapse

I REALLY hope trump is just actively destroying the US either in the name of putin

People won’t discuss that this was all planned in a November 2013 Moscow meeting and announced one month later in December 2013… shortly before the February 2014 Ukraine invasion. lemmy.world/post/27627662/16165977

mmddmm@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 21:02 next collapse

The effects of widespread tariffs is well known.

You will lose industry that makes high added-value products, and increase the production of products with low added-value. (Most people call this “deindustrialization”.)

Tariffs mostly don’t impact the overall trade balance, so there’s no reason to expect that one to change.

aesthelete@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 22:04 next collapse

And since we haven’t moved the needle on the minimum wage in decades, people will be making those low-added value products at starvation wages.

mmddmm@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 22:10 collapse

Well, yes, wages tend to decrease on that shift.

Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca on 02 Apr 22:18 collapse

Except, for example many Canadians, who are really fed up with being the kick ball for American Presidents (Trump has a lot of company when it comes to tariffs), who will do their best to not buy anything from the USA. I predict our trade deficit will go in the opposite direction that Trump hopes. The USA still needs to buy electricity, gas/oil, wood, and various other raw products from Canada. We don’t have to buy finished goods from the USA since there are plenty of other countries to supply them. We really don’t need to vacation there.

mmddmm@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 22:29 collapse

AFAIK, most low added-value products the US net exports are food. Also AFAIK, Canada mostly doesn’t buy those, but the countries that do buy them won’t just stop.

AA5B@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 00:39 next collapse

If we actually want manufacturing in the U.S., give companies incentives to do business here

Like the CHIPS act? The EV and related items? Infrastructure? High speed rail (most of which has a made in us requirement)? What happened to those again?

NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 02:23 collapse

The current administration is trying to pull the funding back even tho its been appropriated by congress. Funny how congress isn’t doing anything about it.

pleasegoaway@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 00:56 next collapse

The trump regime was designed to TANK the US economy so that stocks, businesses, and industries can be bought by billionaires at rock bottom prices.

All is going according to plan.

Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 02:56 collapse

The glue eating rageaholic is doing the opposite of this. He’s going to tarrif farming EXPORTS from the US.

Never in our history has america had such a stupid president.

UnsavoryMollusk@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 06:18 collapse

Wait, what?

wirebeads@lemmy.ca on 02 Apr 20:53 next collapse

Trump: Meta will invest $500 billion.

Truth: Meta will invest around $60 billion.

Thats a gross mis representation of what’s factually correct in monetary terms.

This fucking asshat is going to sink the American economy. No major company is going to do this. Why would TSMC spend “$500 billion” to build a factory?

Them just paying the tariff would be less than building a new factory. They just need to survive trumps term and frankly, when the U.S. can’t get chips at an affordable price from Taiwan, those tariffs will fall away like a pillar f sand during high tide.

Absolutely dumbest fucking turd on the planet.

Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca on 02 Apr 21:02 next collapse

Americans will be paying the tariffs, not foreign companies.

andyquest@sh.itjust.works on 02 Apr 21:08 next collapse

Well they’ll also be paying it in reduced revenue lmao everyone loses

Zentron@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 21:48 collapse

Lol no , if anyone thinks that its the best indicator that they dont know first thing about corpos … theyll just jack the end price

andyquest@sh.itjust.works on 02 Apr 22:44 collapse

Yes, but when things are expensive people buy them less and corporations make less money

wagesj45@fedia.io on 03 Apr 01:09 collapse

I think he was just making a point about how outsized the price of the factory was. Like even if they had to pay the tariffs, it wouldn't be worth it to build a factory, so it's double stupid of Trump to do this.

lydon_feen@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 21:08 collapse

I wish TSMC would open a factory in Europe.

Not only would it be very advantageous for the EU, it would sting like hell for the US.

Renohren@lemmy.today on 02 Apr 21:43 collapse

They are already building one in Dresden, others are planned to follow. The CHIPS act is at last having an effect.

lydon_feen@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 21:59 collapse

Oh cool!

Donjuanme@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 20:54 next collapse

Surprised I don’t see Brasil (sp?) on there not surprised I don’t see Hungary Turkiye Russia or Israel on there.

RandAlThor@lemmy.ca on 02 Apr 20:55 next collapse

Rest of the world is 10%. I assume that’s what they’ll see.

mmddmm@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 21:06 collapse

At least Brazil has tariffs large than that already. I doubt he will decrease them.

JoeKrogan@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 21:11 next collapse

It was 10% as they have a 10% on the US.

catloaf@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 22:24 collapse

In English, Brazil.

te_abstract_art@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 20:54 next collapse

I’d love to open the news one evening and not feel like we’re another step closer to the apocalypse.

Honestly, fuck Trump. Where my Luigis at?

MBech@feddit.dk on 02 Apr 21:00 next collapse

He was inside you all along

Lucky_777@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 21:43 collapse

You can’t get close to orange fuck for anything like that. You gotta hope for a natural luigi to show up and say “time’s up bitch”

TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 21:52 collapse

Not even via a trebuchet?

Trebuchets:

A superior siege engine for today’s trying times!

Lucky_777@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 23:29 collapse

If Trump would be killed by a medieval seige weapon, then I will believe in god again.

TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 00:12 collapse

Imagine he’s golfing and a fucking engine block of a 1982 Buick Regal comes sailing through the air from 200 meters.

One can only dream.

Lucky_777@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 01:45 collapse

I love this idea, make it so fast that it just rolls right over his fat ass, but just enough to put him at deaths doorstep. 15 mins until total death. Put a report next to him. What does he say?

TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 02:09 collapse

Reporter:

Mr. President, would you say that that trebuchet was reciprocal?

samus12345@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 22:19 collapse

He missed.

unmagical@lemmy.ml on 02 Apr 20:55 next collapse

And just like that every American good costs significantly more.

If your family income is less than about $200,000, congratulations, your tax rate has at least doubled.

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 20:58 collapse

How much do I have to make before my tax bill goes down?

Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca on 02 Apr 21:02 collapse

Last I saw, it was 360k.

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 22:15 next collapse

Well, at least I’ve got that, I guess

Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 07:25 collapse

I have to get bigger bootstraps.

guest@feddit.org on 02 Apr 20:57 next collapse

Why is Canada not on the list?

magnetosphere@fedia.io on 02 Apr 21:03 next collapse

Maybe because he’s waiting until the election is over? He’s probably noticed by now that he’s hurting Canada’s Conservative Party.

eezeebee@lemmy.ca on 02 Apr 21:15 collapse

That, or he might actually like Mark Carney. The entire tone seemed to change after they spoke.

OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 00:32 collapse

He saw how much support Poilievre lost after he praised him, so now Mr Big Brain is trying reverse psychology.

resetbypeer@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 20:58 next collapse

The guy is really playing economic Russian roulette. This can consequently go terrible wrong for the US.

Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca on 02 Apr 21:05 next collapse

Like playing ruzzian roulette with a full clip.

Drusas@fedia.io on 03 Apr 02:42 collapse

He doesn't care. He's rich and he's old. He just wants to grift his last few years away. He'll be shielded from the worst of the impacts.

guest@feddit.org on 02 Apr 20:58 next collapse

Does anyone know what the top item is per country above? I guess the number is probably just a dollar weighted average as there are probably different tariffs on different goods.

warm@kbin.earth on 02 Apr 21:01 next collapse

How to isolate your country:

Madbrad200@sh.itjust.works on 02 Apr 21:03 next collapse

Whelp, guess I’m joining the Boycott US movement

gdog05@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 21:22 collapse

Everyone should be boycotting the US, especially those inside of the US.

Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 02 Apr 21:40 collapse

For people inside the US doesnt paying for the tarriffs just means more money going into this administration? Better to only purchase things if you absolutely have to

gdog05@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 22:46 collapse

It doesn’t necessarily give them more money as the tariffs regulate what we’re required to pay a supplier for a good. There’s not like a government fund it goes to or anything (unless my understanding is wrong). But not buying US products outside and inside the states is basically accelerationism on the economy. Which will hopefully wake people up so we can take this shit back for the people (and not just destroy all civilization which is what recent accelerationism has been about). The faster people rise up the less we have to rebuild, hopefully.

EvilCartyen@feddit.dk on 02 Apr 21:05 next collapse

This is kind of hilarious in a dumb way. It’s going to hit american consumers like a goddamn hammer, and will be rewarded with tariffs going the other way, and we’ll all be poorer. Americans most of all.

If he keeps going like this you’ll end up with stagflation - high inflation and a stagnating or recessive economy. That shit is hard to get out of, good luck.

Zentron@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 21:46 collapse

With a balooning debt to gdp ratio, its gonna get unmanagable really fast , people are too stupid to elect another FDR and US’ tech dominance gap will shrink or be outright gone.

Chinese millenia is coming if its not already here

WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works on 02 Apr 22:08 collapse

Honestly, at this point, I think it’s time to just call it a day on the very idea of the US as a single unified nation. The Constitution has been demonstrated, beyond a shadow of a doubt, to be utterly incapable of actually doing its job. It’s a 200+ year old document written in a different age, by people who didn’t have hundreds of examples of modern democracies to draw upon. It was a good attempt, but it’s horribly obsolete at this point. And our institutions are equally not up to the task. And it was written by 13 states who each joined willingly. If you gave each state a chance to join the current US today, how many would actually do it?

We need to peacefully dissolve the whole thing. Dissolve the federal government; grant every state full independence. The states can then come together into whatever number of new nations they wish to form.

This clearly isn’t working. Half the country has completely given up on the Constitution, and the other half thinks institutions and laws alone will magically fix the problem. We’ve crossed the Rubicon. Once a president is allowed to get away with this level of flagrant law breaking, once the courts have become this corrupted, once the system has become so sclerotic and fundamentally incapable of meeting the needs of the people? It’s time to call it quits. There’s no repairing a system like this. Even if free and fair elections happen, electing a Democrat in 2028 will not fix this problem. At best, we’ll get 4 more years of useless waffling, and then another fascist will get elected in 2032.

The US is a couple that has reached an impasse of irreconcilable differences. The US had a good run, but at this point it’s time to admit that it’s run its course, and it is time to move on.

The US isn’t even really a nation; it’s more of an empire. There are vast regional differences in the country. The cultures and desired governments of the people in the different regions vary substantially. But because we’re all locked together in this bloated dying husk of an empire, nobody is happy. There’s a reason the oldest countries in the world tend to be smaller ones. Empires are held together by force, not by common culture and shared values. They tend to collapse under their own weight and contradictions eventually. And the US is no exception.

And we shouldn’t mourn this. The US had a good run. It did some cool things and made some real advancements on the human story. But governments exist ultimately to serve the people. Can anyone really say with a straight face that the people of the US wouldn’t be better served by breaking the US into a series of smaller, more manageable nations that better reflect the will of their people? Would all the nations that border the Mediterranean really be better off if they were still united in the Roman Empire? Would all of Latin America outside of Brazil be better off if it was all still New Spain? Would the people of Asia be happier if they were still united in some post-Mongol empire? I don’t think so.

Sometimes you just need to let things die. It’s time to put the United States out of its misery. We can do better.

gnutrino@programming.dev on 02 Apr 23:53 collapse

Who gets to keep the nukes?

WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 00:37 collapse

This and a hundred other issues would be settled in the process of negotiating the breakup. Odds are only a handful of states would want them, as only a handful would have the economic base to support their upkeep. Nukes are expensive as hell to build and maintain. New York, California, Texas, etc. Like any divorce, you have to negotiate and find a way of dividing communal property.

cosmicrookie@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 21:07 next collapse

This is going to be a bloody mess to witness from the outside. The US are shooting their own foot again and again with a bazooka and it is going to hurt the majority of its population

sasquash@sopuli.xyz on 02 Apr 21:10 next collapse

And our swiss right-wing populists thought Trump was better for the economy. 31% down their stupid throats

MintyFresh@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 21:11 next collapse

Y’all better start learning Chinese

A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 21:12 next collapse

Where were you when Needle drop

I was copper futures

Brother said “economy is kill”

I said “no”

ragepaw@lemmy.ca on 02 Apr 21:12 next collapse

Stop calling them reciprocal.

maplebar@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 21:14 next collapse

Why the fuck is our media so bad that they blindly accept Trump’s bullshit line that the tariffs are “reciprocal”? Are they just stupid or have they been paid off? Do they not know the meaning of “reciprocal” or are they just too fucking lazy to question the White House’s rhetoric even a little bit?

The state of the United States makes me sick. We’re being robbed blind buy the oligarchy in broad daylight while the media gleefully amplifies the administrations lies.

HowRu68@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 21:17 next collapse

FYI , HERE is the most up to date list (including Turkiye, Israel and some others)

Civil_Liberty@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 22:42 collapse

I don’t even have to click on that to know that Russia is not listed.

RoundSparrow@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 22:16 next collapse

Are they just stupid or have they been paid off?

Neither one. they are in a cult. Donald Trump is entertaining / clickbait / meme leadership. The novelty of having a 78 year old man shit-talk on an Apple iPhone they can’t resist. They have brain damage from it all.

“When a population becomes distracted by trivia, when cultural life is redefined as a perpetual round of entertainments, when serious public conversation becomes a form of baby-talk, when, in short, a people become an audience, and their public business a vaudeville act, then a nation finds itself at risk; culture-death is a clear possibility.” ― Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business, 1985 !BackTo1985@lemm.ee

brucethemoose@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 23:51 collapse

Most headlines I see are going with 10%, which is a big understatement.

It’s because they’re run by billionaires. Even liberal, big outlets harp on cultural issues to redirect focus.

TommySoda@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 21:18 next collapse

Bro just crashed the market with a printed out excel sheet.

SirMaple__@lemmy.ca on 02 Apr 21:20 next collapse

Talk about no brains. This will only speed up other countries cutting ties with the US. I’m waiting to see when and which country will be the first to cut diplomatic relations with them.

theneverfox@pawb.social on 03 Apr 00:23 collapse

Nah, that ship has sailed. They’ll never cut diplomatic ties, because why would they?

They’ve already decided they need to come together to live in a world without the US… They’re already making trade deals and new defense pacts, they’re already planning around us

deegeese@sopuli.xyz on 02 Apr 21:22 next collapse

Tarrifs are a Trump Tax on ordinary Americans so they can give tax breaks to billionaires.

bstix@feddit.dk on 02 Apr 22:14 next collapse

Maybe Americans should consider not paying taxes in the first place.

brucethemoose@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 23:49 collapse

Bingo.

It’s true in many roundabout ways, but the math adds up to “break for billionaires.”

Like, it’s full of nepotism and revenge, too. The Taiwan tax sucks. And take the discrete tax on automobiles and auto parts: I’ll give you one guess on who that benefits.

Buffalox@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 21:26 next collapse

“our country has been looted, pillaged, raped, plundered”

by other nations selling their goods to us cheaply, and by them accepting our Dollars that cost us nothing to make for it!!

I don’t think Trump understands the benefits and privileges for USA of having the top international reserve currency.
But maybe if he ruins it quick enough, he may find out?

Play stupid games and win stupid prices.

RoundSparrow@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 22:12 next collapse

Play stupid games and win stupid prices.

He is playing Vlad Putin 8D Chess, not Donald Trump 1D Checkers. lemmy.world/post/27627662/16165977 This was all planned in 2013.

Introduction to the Kremlin media techniques of year 2014

  1. Peter Pomerantsev September 9, 2014: Russia and the Menace of Unreality. How Vladimir Putin is revolutionizing information warfare

  2. Adam Curtis, BBC, December 31, 2014: On The “Contradictory Vaudeville” Of Post-Modern Politics - “What this film is going to suggest is that that defeatist response has become a central part of a new system of political control. And to understand how this is happening, you have to look to Russia, to a man called Vladislav Surkov, who is a hero of our time. Surkov is one of President Putin’s advisers, and has helped him maintain his power for 15 years, but he has done it in a very new way.”

  3. Book reading from December 5, 2014 on the subject by Peter Pomerantsev

selokichtli@lemmy.ml on 03 Apr 04:51 collapse

Own your president Trump. Even if your theory was true, and I won’t qualify it, nothing of this could have been possible without a ruined education system and mindless propaganda. All of this starts way before 2013.

militaryintelligence@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 09:08 next collapse

I’d argue it started with Bush and his No Child Left Behind bullshit. It forced a certain curriculum to leave out common sense and critical thinking skills

RoundSparrow@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 14:35 collapse

I’d argue it started with Bush and his No Child Left Behind bullshit. It forced a certain curriculum to leave out common sense and critical thinking skills

Children aren’t the problem. it’s adults who get their constant education off anonymous memes. The year 2007 introduction of the Apple iPhone changed everything about USA society. We had the Fox News Rupert Murdoch problem since 1996, but the shit memes people flock to and “shit postings” addiction are the learning / education / study problem.

Shitpostinh education is very predictable adult education outcome. Cal Sagan predicted in in 1995: “Science is more than a body of knowledge; it is a way of thinking. I have a foreboding (from 1995) of an America in my children’s or grandchildren’s time—when the United States is a service and information economy; when nearly all the key manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries; when awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few, and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues; when the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority; when, clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline, unable to distinguish between what feels good and what’s true, we slide, almost without noticing, back into superstition and darkness. The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow decay of substantive content in the enormously influential media, the 30-second sound bites (now down to 10 seconds or less), lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudoscience and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance. As I write, the number-one videocassette rental in America is the movie Dumb and Dumber. “Beavis and Butthead” remain popular (and influential) with young TV viewers. The plain lesson is that study and learning—not just of science, but of anything—are avoidable, even undesirable.” ― Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, year 1995

selokichtli@lemmy.ml on 03 Apr 16:25 collapse

It’s like the USA won the Cold War and found themselves with nowhere left to go, exhausted. The state became less relevant by the year as it was intended by their neoliberalism, and greed is always everywhere taking over as many spaces as possible, it’s just its nature. But an ever disappearing government is just a milking cow, why it even exist if it’s been taken by the greedy? In this scenario, instead of being hopeful about its mere existence, because it should be one way for the people to regain power, it is just another way to take more wealth from the people, and an instrument to control them.

My point was that Trump, Trump-Putin, are just a consequence. The USA government showed critical weaknesses and they are being exploited. At the same time, you point it out well, the government found weaknesses of society to exploit. Americans should exploit them too, usually it’s done politically, but both of the American parties are basically the same (I know politically involved individuals do hate this statement, but from outside of the USA it’s very clear); it’s time for the people to regain power, and they will, this tariffs craze is gonna make them have to fight back.

RoundSparrow@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 14:31 collapse

Own your president Trump.

People need to own up to anonymous no-identity social media addiction. The egomania they get chasing junk (drugs) off of Apple iPhone / iPad / Samsung / machine devices. Donald Trump is entirely an Apple iPhone addict in egomania off machine lust, as too is Elon Musk.

nothing of this could have been possible without a ruined education system and mindless propaganda.

Nothing is more mindless than the education people get off of Lemmy memes, Reddit memes, Bluesky memes, Fox News HDTV, Joe Rogan. That’s the education that creates an audience for Donald Trump. Self-centered eoomania, like the Middle East gets with one religion vs. another religion. Fiction addiction problems are raging in USA.

Even if your theory was true

My theory:

“When a population becomes distracted by trivia, when cultural life is redefined as a perpetual round of entertainments, when serious public conversation becomes a form of baby-talk, when, in short, a people become an audience, and their public business a vaudeville act, then a nation finds itself at risk; culture-death is a clear possibility.” ― Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business, 1985 !BackTo1985@lemm.ee

barneypiccolo@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 02:15 next collapse

One of my main rules of life is that people are most suspicious of the behavior they are most likely to perform. Cheaters think they’re being cheated on, thieves think everybody is stealing from them. If HitlerPig thinks everyone else is looting, pillaging, raping, and plundering, its because that what he does.

Wanpieserino@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 04:20 next collapse

Buying from other economies does two things. One, you have access to their expertise/efficiency.

Not everyone will have invested in the same industry.

Will miss out on cheap labour. Cheap resources.

Don’t be dumb though, selling us USD for our products isn’t just “printing paper”. We use those USD (mostly we sell the debt to china) to buy USA companies. It’s capitalism after all.

StopJoiningWars@discuss.online on 03 Apr 12:15 collapse

I literally just corrected someone else about the opposite mistake.

“prizes”*

Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io on 02 Apr 21:27 next collapse

Imports from Cambodia: https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/imports/cambodia

and Vietnam: https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/imports/vietnam

smh

courageousstep@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 21:34 collapse

I wonder how fast and much daily fashion will change. Like, no more knitted or crocheted items, or their resale value will go way up.

gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com on 02 Apr 21:57 collapse

If their cost goes way up, that might make hand-made American items comparatively affordable, maybe for the first time in modern history. It's (potentially) a good thing for a bad reason, I guess.

AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today on 02 Apr 22:33 collapse

I doubt that, to be honest. The supplies to make the items will also go up in price, and the US simply doesn’t have the industrial power and cheap labor that other countries have to make them. GOP voters think that somehow it’ll make all things cheaper (which actually would be a bad thing, deflation isn’t a good sign for the economy), but the price of everything is about to skyrocket.

That’s not to mention that the few suppliers that are 100% US based would just crank up their prices anyway, because they can.

Personally, and not having much experience in economics, I think prices will skyrocket, people will stop buying things, and then that will cause huge amounts of deflation, bringing the US right into a deep recession. I mean, my partner and friends have already stopped spending as much, and that was before today. It’s only going to get worse.

gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com on 02 Apr 22:53 collapse

Oh, I don't mean on an industrial scale. Sorry for any confusion. I was thinking of small-scale artists who have crochet businesses. It might be easier to sell $30 plushies if all of the plushies from Vietnam (and other places known for cheap hand-made products) are now $50.

AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today on 02 Apr 23:12 next collapse

Ah, gotcha. It’ll be interesting (in a bad way, most likely) to see how this will affect those business.

brucethemoose@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 23:47 next collapse

The tiny scale artists still have to buy supplies. And eat, and pay rent.

Don’t forget, this is a regressive tax, and small craft workers tend to be poor.

Their prices will go up as much. It may even be worse for them, in aggregate, even if selling more of their stuff.

gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com on 03 Apr 02:33 collapse

Fair enough, yarn and notions will get more expensive. There's also the issue of access to supplies in the first place just because JoAnn was a lot of people's only option.

SupahRevs@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 23:53 collapse

Fewer people in the US are going to want to spend that much on a plushy. Unemployment is going to rise under Trump. There will be increased costs for needs and less cash for wants. But we will probably have continued inequality, so if a small scale artist can sell to rich people, they may do well.

Doorbook@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 21:41 next collapse

Does that mean oil is also 10% up?

brucethemoose@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 23:45 collapse

Probably fucking subsidized instead, though I didn’t see specifics about fossil fuels

TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 21:46 next collapse

Only ones “looting, raping, and pillaging our country” are billionaires.

pennomi@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 21:51 next collapse

This is killing so many small businesses. I know mine is basically dead now

ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 21:53 next collapse

This Wikipedia page is going to be relevant to all our lives very soon.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoot–Hawley_Tariff_Act

dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 21:56 collapse

In 1930, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, to alleviate the effects of the…Anyone? Anyone? The Great Depression passed the, anyone? Anyone? The tariff bill? The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act? Which, anyone? Raised or lowered? Raised tariffs to collect more revenue for the federal government. Did it work? Anyone? Anyone know the effects? It did not work, and the United States sank deeper into the Great Depression.

jownz@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 22:03 collapse

… Bueller? … Bueller?

collapse_already@lemmy.ml on 02 Apr 21:57 next collapse

So is the plan to drive the cost of everyday essentials so high that virtually everyone bankrupts and the billionaires buy all of our assets for pennies on the thousand dollars? That is all I can come up with trying to make a scenario where this has some coherent objective.

10001110101@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 23:10 next collapse

He wants to use tariffs (which act like a flat-tax) to lower income tax on the rich. There’s speculation he’s also doing something like the “Mar-a-Lago Accord,” which involves devaluing the dollar (causing inflation). If wages don’t rise with the inflation (which they don’t want), US labor will be more competitive, so people can work in factory jobs with pay analogous to current Chinese factory workers.

turnip@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 00:38 collapse

Project 2025 says he wants to have tariffs removed against the US. Assuming he’s really following it.

illegible@discuss.tchncs.de on 03 Apr 02:10 collapse

They probably want him to do it, but he’s too stupid to follow a script.

Faith_Bubbles@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 02 Apr 23:38 next collapse

Some of the architects who helped win the second American civil war say yes:

Firstly, it is essential to squash the democratic myth that a state ‘belongs’ to the citizenry. The point of neo-cameralism is to buy out the real stakeholders in sovereign power, not to perpetuate sentimental lies about mass enfranchisement. Unless ownership of the state is formally transferred into the hands of its actual rulers, the neo-cameral transition will simply not take place, power will remain in the shadows, and the democratic farce will continue.

So, secondly, the ruling class must be plausibly identified. It should be noted immediately, in contradistinction to Marxist principles of social analysis, that this is not the ‘capitalist bourgeoisie’. Logically, it cannot be. The power of the business class is already clearly formalized, in monetary terms, so the identification of capital with political power is perfectly redundant. It is necessary to ask, rather, who do capitalists pay for political favors, how much these favors are potentially worth, and how the authority to grant them is distributed. This requires, with a minimum of moral irritation, that the entire social landscape of political bribery (‘lobbying’) is exactly mapped, and the administrative, legislative, judicial, media, and academic privileges accessed by such bribes are converted into fungible shares. Insofar as voters are worth bribing, there is no need to entirely exclude them from this calculation, although their portion of sovereignty will be estimated with appropriate derision. The conclusion of this exercise is the mapping of a ruling entity that is the truly dominant instance of the democratic polity. Moldbug calls it the Cathedral.

The formalization of political powers, thirdly, allows for the possibility of effective government. Once the universe of democratic corruption is converted into a (freely transferable) shareholding in gov-corp. the owners of the state can initiate rational corporate governance, beginning with the appointment of a CEO. As with any business, the interests of the state are now precisely formalized as the maximization of long-term shareholder value. There is no longer any need for residents (clients) to take any interest in politics whatsoever. In fact, to do so would be to exhibit semi-criminal proclivities. If gov-corp doesn’t deliver acceptable value for its taxes (sovereign rent), they can notify its customer service function, and if necessary take their custom elsewhere. Gov-corp would concentrate upon running an efficient, attractive, vital, clean, and secure country, of a kind that is able to draw customers. No voice, free exit.

Doomsider@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 05:29 collapse

The architects of clowndom. Seriously reading this stuff makes me feel like I am losing brain cells at a rapid rate.

drhodl@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 00:00 next collapse

A poor America, with no friends in the world suits Vlad Pootang very well. It will be like the world has 2 Russia’s…

pleasegoaway@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 00:54 next collapse

The trump regime was designed to TANK the US economy so that stocks, businesses, and industries can be bought by billionaires at rock bottom prices.

All is going according to plan.

MisterOwl@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 01:22 collapse

Yup.

CircaV@lemmy.ca on 02 Apr 22:04 next collapse

As a 🇨🇦 my boycott will last a lifetime.

Windex007@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 23:13 collapse

One of the benefits of having young children is that if I play my cards right “my” boycott could exceed my own lifetime.

commander@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 22:08 next collapse

Don’t buy American. Make America lose the trade war and crawl away from these tariffs

newthrowaway20@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 22:09 next collapse

Lol, the bitch waited till the markets closed to announce it.

brucethemoose@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 23:43 collapse

I’m not sure that’s any better, as traders and news have a whole night to digest it now. It might’ve seemed less bad with just an hour (before the next controversy consumes the cycle).

commander@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 22:12 next collapse

How are they even coming up with the number all these countries supposedly tariff the US?

VanillaFrosty@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 03:11 collapse

Gork. The rats AI.

I’m not joking.

bstix@feddit.dk on 02 Apr 22:12 next collapse

Never mind the money. Think about this: Is the American lifestyle self-sustainable?

No? Why not?

Because they use more than they produce? Yes, and where do those things come from?

Imports? Yes.

Trump litteraly put a stop to the American lifestyle.

SupahRevs@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 23:39 collapse

Yep. In the next few years I expect more Americans to raise pigs on their suburban plots.

SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 22:14 next collapse

Just saw a news item here in the Netherlands about a bourbon distillery in the US and the owner said that in the long term the tariffs will be good for his business. LOL these magats are delusional. I fucking hope he and his ilk become destitute. Sorry not sorry.

null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Apr 22:16 next collapse

Just trying to understand the Australian perspective on this. Maybe others can correct me.

He’s using the term “reciprocal” as a way of saying certain practices are unfair.

For example, we refuse to import raw meat products because we don’t have mad cow disease here.

We also don’t have american style healthcare, so pharmaceuticals can’t be advertised and are purchased exclusively through the federal government procurement scheme.

In response, he’s applying a 10% tariff on any Imports from Australia. I assume this is in addition to the aluminium and iron ore tariffs but I’m not sure.

We have a federal election coming up so the opinions of both major parties are relevant. Our current progressive PM says it will hurt the US more than us, that we’re not going to respond with tariffs on US products, and we do have legal recourse through our existing free trade agreement.

From here it’s hard to see this as anything other than a huge self-own by the Trump Administration. We just don’t export a lot of stuff to the US, our stock market has responded positively since the announcement. I would be absolutely gutted if the Australian government made any concessions what so ever, and I don’t think I’m alone in that. We have our fair share of MAGA idiots down under, but even they are nationalists, with families. No one here has any interest in letting Trump fuck with our health care system just so Americans pay less in tariffs.

TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 22:17 next collapse

After hour stock trading is a fucking slaughter right now. We might see the biggest drop in history tomorrow.

Sl00k@programming.dev on 02 Apr 22:26 next collapse

China: 34%

Added note that this is cumulative so it’s 54% total. Confirmed by Press secretary earlier.

Sl00k@programming.dev on 02 Apr 22:30 next collapse

Holy shit the post-market drops for SPY and QQQ are insane. I haven’t seen a post/pre market move this sharp since Covid <img alt="" src="https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/3964243f-35d7-4872-99a2-4cc7d42c7c75.jpeg">

brucethemoose@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 23:55 collapse

They’ll try to spin it in tomorrows finance news, so it may be sharp but not as sharp as it should be.

4am@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 22:47 next collapse

As I understand it, that “rest of the world” is actually a base tariff, and the rest of these are ON TOP OF that.

So China is actually 44%, etc

Lemdro@lemdro.id on 03 Apr 08:23 collapse

I think they don’t get it either.

gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works on 02 Apr 22:50 next collapse

Lmfao buckle up for the second Great Depression, everyone! It’ll be fun! ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ

TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 00:17 collapse

With hundreds of millions of high powered weapons floating around?

You bet!! ᕕ(ᐛ)ᕗ

Litebit@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 22:52 next collapse

Russia?

JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee on 02 Apr 23:09 next collapse

I think it’s important to note that this will kill a great many small businesses.

Larger companies have a larger supply in giant warehouses. Small businesses order smaller quantities more often. They get fucked sooner with the costs going up. If a customer wants to support that small business they sometimes would have to pay twice what they could get it for from a larger company. This is a deep consolidation of wealth.

pleasegoaway@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 00:53 next collapse

The trump regime was designed to TANK the US economy so that stocks, businesses, and industries can be bought by billionaires at rock bottom prices.

All is going according to plan.

barneypiccolo@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 02:03 collapse

When it’s not working, it’s working.

clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 01:36 collapse

Large companies can also bully suppliers to force them to lower prices at their end

BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 23:33 next collapse

Did he wait until late afternoon Apr 2nd?

He failed to do it “the day l’m elected.”

He failed to do it the day he was sworn in.

He failed to do it, like 5 times from Jan - Mar.

He failed to do it Apr 1.

He failed to do business during business hours Apr 2nd.

This little baby just keeps failing and hiding.

CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Apr 00:05 collapse

But…he’s still racist right? Because that’s all I care about. Making sure it’s still okay to be racist.

crystalmerchant@lemmy.world on 02 Apr 23:39 next collapse

Cambodia be like

Tikiporch@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 00:12 next collapse
tacosanonymous@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 01:37 collapse

Breast milk prices are going to skyrocket.

Buelldozer@lemmy.today on 02 Apr 23:51 next collapse

Smells like Smoot-Hawley up in this bitch.

troybot@midwest.social on 03 Apr 01:08 next collapse

Sick history reference.

adrian783@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 02:09 next collapse

anyone? anyone?

match@pawb.social on 03 Apr 04:26 collapse

The act and tariffs imposed by U.S.'s trading partners in retaliation [for the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act] were major factors in the reduction of American exports and imports by 67% during the Great Depression.

fake_meows@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 02:36 collapse

Rolling back the odometer to the 1930s.

brucethemoose@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 00:14 next collapse

This gold from wallstreetbets:

Soooo is the tariffs charged to the United States really a ratio of the trade imbalance?? For example Vietnam imported roughly 14.6 billion in goods from the United States, and we imported around 146 billion, so thus they have decided tariffs are 90% to the United States…thus we are putting a tariff on them of half of that…which means we are literally tariffing the goods we either a)need more or b) get more efficiently at a higher rate? That may be the absolute dumbest way to create a tariff policy I could imagine if that is the case…which it looks to be.

old.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/…/ml476s7/

kandoh@reddthat.com on 03 Apr 01:59 collapse

People are saying if you ask ChatGPT the easiest way to do a global tariff based on trade deficits with a minimum of 10 percent - it spits out the exact same numbers.

fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Apr 02:37 next collapse

The Oracle!! 👁️👄👁️

Haha, this is is a stupid timeline.

match@pawb.social on 03 Apr 04:25 collapse

unable to reproduce this, sorry

AA5B@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 00:32 next collapse

Sweeping tariffs? Shit, I need a new broom

Furtive@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 00:45 next collapse

Huh, Malaysia and Indonesia are also there

Trimatrix@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 01:24 next collapse

From an electrical engineering perspective H O S E D. Historically, “Oh you want to manufacture something cheaply but can’t due to IP issues or CCP conflicts of interests? Why not Malaysia, Vietnam or the Philippines?”

People got to realize this is gonna jack up the supply chain so hard. Texas Instruments an IC manufacturer produces some stuff in texas. If my production is in Malaysia then surprise! Tariff to send components to Malaysia. But wait, programming, testing, packaging, and inventory of the boards is in the USA. So the PCBA is surprise surprise Tariff again. Now that the board is considered finished and ready to be sold, it turns out your customer is in china or anywhere else in the world…. So tariff. These Tariffs compound. The business isn’t going to foot the bill so its gonna get pushed to customers.

I am really curious how the TSMC foundry in AZ is gonna work out. They can produce the wafers but packaging is done still in Taiwan. So tariff to Taiwan , tariff again back to the USA, and the tariff again because its an advanced electronic component?

berno@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 01:41 collapse

Semiconductors (and lots of other things) are excluded

Trimatrix@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 01:44 collapse

got any legit sources to reference? legitimately curious. I need to know which harmonized codes are excluded.

berno@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 02:49 collapse

whitehouse.gov/…/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-tr…

  • Some goods will not be subject to the Reciprocal Tariff. These include: (1) articles subject to 50 USC 1702(b); (2) steel/aluminum articles and autos/auto parts already subject to Section 232 tariffs; (3) copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and lumber articles; (4) all articles that may become subject to future Section 232 tariffs; (5) bullion; and (6) energy and other certain minerals that are not available in the United States.
match@pawb.social on 03 Apr 01:58 collapse

Once more the USA forgets about its biggest former colony

pleasegoaway@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 00:53 next collapse

The trump regime was designed to TANK the US economy so that stocks, businesses, and industries can be bought by billionaires at rock bottom prices.

All is going according to plan.

tikifire@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 02:29 next collapse

If it crashes badly enough their money will be worthless.

brucethemoose@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 02:29 next collapse

I’m all for “it’s benefitting the billionaires,” and that’s what tariffs do, but most of the ultra-wealthy’s money is tied up in the market, too. It’s more that this is a regressive tax to fund cuts to progressive taxes, fucking shit up is not the intent.

Some of the administration’s actions really are them drinking their own Kool-aid. Like, what they’ve done to the HHS is objectively detrimental to the ultra-wealthy old guys too. There’s some arguments to be had around tariffs, but implementing them Iike this is more on the kool-aid side.

barsoap@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 03:33 next collapse

but most of the ultra-wealthy’s money is tied up in the market, too.

The ultra-wealthy have enough of a buffer to buy out all the middling-wealthy when they go bankrupt. They can buy the dip without themselves going bankrupt.

stopdropandprole@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 05:37 collapse

wealthy people are not a monolith. some, those with advance warning (insider advantage) will benefit while others lose out. this is not just about rich vs poor, it’s also ultra rich vs ultra rich, cabals of powerful elites vying for control of global markets in the chaotic aftermath of global financial restructuring.

stopdropandprole@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 05:34 collapse

in addition to buy low, sell high… perhaps even more lucrative, the crash will be used as an excuse for another massive corporate bailout benefiting the wealthiest business owners and will accelerate the transfer of wealth from govt (taxpayers/poors) to private interests (oligarchs and bankers). this happened in 2008, during Covid PPP, and it will happen again.

b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 03 Apr 01:14 next collapse

Boycott the USA. Do not consume American products. Do not travel to the US. Cancel your subscriptions, find alternatives or pirate their software and media. Make Americans tourists feel unwelcome.

Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 01:31 next collapse

But like, could I come visit if I need to seek asylum? That would be different than tourism, right? I’m not really happy or comfortable with the situation here, nor have my efforts been able to change other people’s views (e.g. make them think about consequences).

b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 03 Apr 01:38 next collapse

Ok to be fair… You may come as long as you’re a queer / trans baddie or if your name is Luigi, or take the “death to America” pledge. 😌

Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 01:41 next collapse

Deal. I stopped pledging “allegiance to the flag” over a decade ago when I realized this wasn’t a nation with “liberty and justice for all”. I’ll also bring some trans baddie friends with me.

danciestlobster@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 02:34 next collapse

I’ll take that pledge without even visiting your country! Then again when I do!

Seriously though, this regime is terrible and some of us are protesting every opportunity we can get. I’ll be the first to admit America has deeply rooted problems but some of us are trying to fix it and would like to not be treated like shit for the actions of the magats

Adderbox76@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 17:08 collapse

Admitting your country has problems is “woke”, though. /s

drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 03:53 collapse

Why would I say that? The country is already dead.

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 07:28 collapse

“Death to America” is no longer a call to action; now it’s just remarking on current events.

Wanpieserino@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 04:10 collapse

Immigrants are welcome, tourists as well.

Infinite@lemmy.zip on 03 Apr 04:20 next collapse

I’m an American, and I endorse this message.

Lennnny@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 04:28 collapse

Same. Got chickens, veg seeds, and I’m about to buy a bow for hunting my own meat. Fuck the US, time to crack out that survivalism I’ve been practicing.

psycho_driver@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 04:32 next collapse

I get where you’re coming from, but the whole tourist thing . . . remember half of us fucking despise Trump and his merry band of fascist fuckwits.

itisileclerk@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 06:34 next collapse

Make America go away!

vala@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 17:38 next collapse

Not sure about that part.

Darkmoon_UK@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 21:33 collapse

I’m doing my part! More an intent to strengthen the EU, than specifically weaken the US. Cancelled all US tech subscriptions (not a small deal as a software dev). Cloud services all moved to Scaleway in France, AI migrated to Mistral, mail to Tuta, maps to Mapy.cz and more…

Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 01:18 next collapse

Like for brooms and shit?

kandoh@reddthat.com on 03 Apr 02:02 next collapse

This is like watching the toughest guy in the prison who runs the biggest gang just start smashing his own head against the concrete floor

turbulentMagma@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 02:15 next collapse

Look I’m a big boy doing big boy things

kebab@endlesstalk.org on 03 Apr 02:20 next collapse

Switzerland 31%

What the fuck

Fingolfinz@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 02:20 next collapse

And crashed the market more!

PurpleSkull@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 02:34 next collapse

Thanks for typing out the percentages, so far I’ve only seen emotional news reports about it without any detailed info.

Are these tariffs on ALL goods from a certain country? Eg, does 34% on China mean 34% on ALL Chinese goods or just certain ones like cars?

Well, one of two things will happen now.

  • The US economy will recede by roughly 30% over the coming years (classified by economists as “catastrophic collapse”)

  • It will turn out that trade was “fake and gay” all along and autarky is the way to go, despite centuries of historic lessons to the contrary.

Take your pick.

RandAlThor@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 02:41 next collapse

It’s all goods from those countries.

Baguette@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 03:12 next collapse

30% seems pretty generous. Nevermind the complete collapse of trade and alliances we built over the past century, won’t countries stop using the us dollar as the backing reserve? Which will likely set america on an even further downward trend, especially since the dollar isn’t on the gold standard anymore?

corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 03:45 next collapse

won’t countries stop using the us dollar as the backing reserve

Yeah. Putin’s gonna be so pleased.

lepinkainen@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 05:19 collapse

I hope Euro takes over

The_Caretaker@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 10:39 collapse

BRICS will take over, which will benefit Russia and China. Putin is getting his money’s worth out of pimping Trump.

match@pawb.social on 03 Apr 04:19 collapse

american juche now!

werefreeatlast@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 02:37 next collapse

I was gonna get me some Cambodia and Vietnam from eBay. Now what?

ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml on 03 Apr 02:37 next collapse

Oh boy. It’s stagflation time

werefreeatlast@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 02:39 next collapse

Can’t wait for tomorrow’s sell off. Its going to be a black Friday Friday.

1ns1p1d@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 02:40 next collapse

I swear that if we could just all ignore him unless he does nice things, we’ll make him stop. The tariffs are not his plan. That’s someone else pulling the strings. He just likes the attention. Giving a malignant narcissist any kind of supply is just going to make him worse. His fans already treat him like the messiah.

Gray rock the shit out of him. Remove his name from the internet, hack Fox news - take it all down, and only give it back when he behaves like a good boy.

stopdropandprole@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 05:27 collapse

this would have worked in 2016, I doubt it would now. the oligarchs who put the administration in power want their pound of flesh, and they will get it regardless of whose name is in the daily headlines.

hundreds of thousands of federal workers have been fired, research and education slashed, unprecedented damage done to institutions, and civil rights violations not seen in peacetime in generations. no, I’m afraid ignoring Trump isn’t going to solve anything.

the oligarchs must be stopped. one way or another.

mlg@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 03:12 next collapse

I don’t know what the actual reasoning is but the 49/46% on Cambodia and Vietnam sounds an awful lot like how we still embargo Cuba like decades after failing to overthrow Castro.

Seasm0ke@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 05:21 next collapse

Lots of good cheap building materials and cloth come from Vietnam. Trump publically thinks that by cutting off these it will bring the rust belt back. Absolute lunacy.

skisnow@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 08:49 next collapse

Reminder that after setting the political stage for the Khmer Rouge to take power with the carpet-bombing of Cambodia, the US Government continued to recognize Pol Pot as its rightful ruler all the way through to the early 1990s, simply because the actual Cambodian government of the 80s was installed with Vietnam’s help.

The USA seems to be on an never-ending quest to fuck Indochina over for no fucking reason.

Nalivai@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 13:00 collapse

The number for a tariff is a trading deficit divided by total export of a country. It’s simplistically stupid. <img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/44496d66-8a26-4c1d-9794-a7d8ab797f90.jpeg">

kebab@endlesstalk.org on 03 Apr 14:12 collapse

Russia is missing from the chart:

Overview In January 2025, United States exported $34.9M and imported $196M from Russia, resulting in a negative trade balance of $161M.

Nalivai@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 14:25 collapse

Yeah, I wouldn’t be surprised if Russia was it’s own case, comrade Krasnov will make sure of it

bingBingBongBong@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 03:18 next collapse

Did it come up with random numbers, or did russian scientists device the percentages in hidden laboratories

learningduck@programming.dev on 03 Apr 03:43 collapse

Figured out where these fake tariff rates come from that Trump is claiming. They didn’t actually calculate tariff rates + non-tariff barriers, as they say they did. Instead, for every country, they just took our trade deficit with that country and divided it by the country’s exports to us.

So we have a $17.9 billion trade deficit with Indonesia. Its exports to us are $28 billion. $17.9/$28 = 64%, which Trump claims is the tariff rate Indonesia charges us. What extraordinary nonsense this is.

Copied from twitter from someone who’s suffering insomnia right now.

Figured out where these fake tariff rates come from that Trump is claiming. They didn’t actually calculate tariff rates + non-tariff barriers, as they say they did. Instead, for every country, they just took our trade deficit with that country and divided it by the country’s exports to us.

So we have a $17.9 billion trade deficit with Indonesia. Its exports to us are $28 billion. $17.9/$28 = 64%, which Trump claims is the tariff rate Indonesia charges us. What extraordinary nonsense this is.

www.reddit.com/r/Thailand/comments/…/ml4328d?utm_…

Source of these trade deficit numbers is in www.reddit.com/r/Thailand/s/TKZ68gLs6z

bingBingBongBong@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 03:52 next collapse

Thanks for pointing that out. If that is true, it is completely deranged.

Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de on 03 Apr 05:58 collapse

I checked and this does seem to fit for Switzerland.

Trade deficit of US to Switzerland: 38.5 B
Exports from Switzerland to US: 63.4 B

Ratio of the two: 61%

Half of that as “reciprocal” tariff: 31%

psycho_driver@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 04:29 next collapse

Fuck Cambodia specifically. Trump probably got a bad VD from there at some point.

ikidd@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 04:46 next collapse

Probably got a surprise when he went to grab a ladyboy by the pussy.

skisnow@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 08:36 collapse

The horrible cruelty regarding Cambodia is that the reason they have such a high trade deficit is that most Cambodians are too poor to be able to begin to afford anything that America has to offer.

It’s one of the poorest countries in Asia, they could cut their tariffs to 0% and the net effect would be less than the measurable rounding error on total American exports.

Trump is going to tank the economy of an already poverty-stricken country and plunge it into exactly the kind of instability that destroyed it once already just because “fuck you, give me more”.

andros_rex@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 08:48 next collapse
KatakiY@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 15:27 collapse

www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1cbTKX4Lzo&list=PLf03ejE…

If anyone wants to learn more about America’s actions in Cambodia, check out Blowback.

pyre@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 04:33 next collapse

isn’t this just going to fuck up the US economy rather than meaningfully affect any other country? you don’t fucking produce anything worth a shit anymore.

lepinkainen@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 05:16 next collapse

He is gambling on the fact that Us economy can hold off longer than other countries and they’ll cave

It’s like two people holding their breath bad for both but neither wants to lose

uienia@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 09:10 collapse

Cave about what though?

lepinkainen@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 09:32 collapse

Tariffs. Donald wants other countries to have less tariffs on American products

Riprif@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 10:22 collapse

Those numbers on his poster are made up and don’t reflect actual tariffs that exist and can be cut.

lepinkainen@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 10:41 collapse

Yep, they just took the trade deficit to each country and turned it into a tariff 😆

Rakonat@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 05:53 next collapse

Trump has no idea how the economy works, his wealth is propped up by Russian oligarchs laundering money through his assets.

This move is almost certainly being directed to him through foreign agents the traitor has as advisors (though they consider themselves handlers) on behalf of Putin and other regimes hostile to the US who back door’d their way into the situation through his greed and lack of morality.

andros_rex@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 08:45 collapse

Also intentionally crashing the economy to hurt political enemies and cause civil unrest (mass government firings = lots of educated qualified people out of work, also drives down wages of other educated qualified people). Techo-fascist corporate cities and Gilead don’t need a Dow Jones index.

PonyOfWar@pawb.social on 03 Apr 06:46 next collapse

It will have an effect on other countries, but fuck up the US economy the worst. Other countries have the benefit of having 190+ other countries to do trade with. Over the next few years, they will increasingly go for alternatives to whatever they’ve previously traded with the US. Thanks to the stable genius, the US will permanently be left poorer, while other countries will soon have economic growth again.

The_Caretaker@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 10:37 next collapse

The overabundance doesn’t just vanish. When the poor have less, the wealthy have more. There may be more homeless people fighting over food but the billionaires will be able to get a fleet of yachts.

Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Apr 14:16 next collapse

This is really not true. The wealthy aren’t playing 4D chess with the economy, they are just as short-sighted behind closed doors. The Great Depression fucked a lot of wealthy people up and turned the entire nation against them. It can happen again.

Edit - and for the record, the abundance does vanish in a depression scenario. Factories shut down, productivity collapses. The world will literally extract, refine, process, and build less of everything. You can’t build a fleet of yachts without a functioning economy.

Jamini@lemmy.zip on 03 Apr 17:31 collapse

The Great Depression fucked a lot of wealthy people up and turned the entire nation against them. It can happen again.

One might argue it already is happening. Right now. In real time.

Be safe.

CileTheSane@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 19:00 collapse

Just like how a rising tide raises all boats, a sinking ship takes everyone down with it. The billionaires think being on the life rafts will make them more wealthy compared to those that are sinking.

javiwhite@feddit.uk on 03 Apr 11:00 next collapse

Most of the kit that is made in US uses parts distributed by other countries… So even domestic sales of US created products are likely to be impacted. Gotta give it to Krasnov, he’s doing a bloody good job at the task he’s been set.

Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 11:23 collapse

Could you imagine if Biden declared what essentially amounts to a 10% sales tax?

Bytemeister@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 18:20 collapse

Oh no. We produce stuff. The best weapons for killing people are made here.

P1nkman@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 04:41 next collapse

In 2020, I thought Covid might crash the economy. You know, history repeats itself. But oh, was I wrong; it’ll all be caused by a single fuckwit which deserves to be tortured.

Fuck anyone involved in making the world a worse place. I hope they all die in fucking agony.

FreakinSteve@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 05:09 next collapse

Together, we can make that happen

Riprif@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 10:25 collapse

The crash in 2020 was twice as deep as it should have been. The markets were spooked by a president repeating conspiracy theories instead of reassuring people while health organizations were scrambling and panicking.

dovahking@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 05:07 next collapse

Conveniently left Russia out. I wonder why.

Furbag@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 05:14 next collapse

Russia and North Korea.

It’s official. We are the baddies now.

ripcord@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 08:13 next collapse

If we can’t buy anythibg from North Korea, what would be tariffed?

Idiott@lemmynsfw.com on 03 Apr 09:28 collapse

He tariffed uninhabited Heard Island and McDonald Island tho

j_elgato@leminal.space on 03 Apr 08:46 next collapse

… Now?

CileTheSane@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 18:55 collapse

Then too, also now.

Adiemus@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 11:28 next collapse

I am not.

Dimmer@leminal.space on 03 Apr 12:21 collapse

Just stopped pretending to be good.

LuckyPierre@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 05:56 next collapse

I think you’re reading too much into that.

They’re either under “Rest of world” like the EU, or the US doesn’t import anything from it, which as it’s under sanctions, it shouldn’t - nor export to.

whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 07:53 next collapse

Like the EU?

And009@lemmynsfw.com on 03 Apr 08:28 next collapse

Read it some more, Russia is 10%. Half of EU

dovahking@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 10:23 collapse

UK is also 10% like the rest of world. Why was it mentioned seperately? It’s not like Russia is a small country.

[deleted] on 03 Apr 12:07 collapse
.
itisileclerk@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 06:31 collapse

They are rest of the World. How dissrespectfull.

Furbag@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 05:20 next collapse

US dollar in absolute freefall. Thursday is going to be a bloodbath when the market opens.

AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 07:59 next collapse

It’s 8D chess. By crashing the economy and the dollar he can then increase the price of gold and liquidate Ft Knox at the perfect time. Then he can replace the dollar with trumpcoin. Truly a genius and a patriot.

Is /s needed?

iii@mander.xyz on 03 Apr 08:09 collapse

1.084USD per EUR yesterday moved to 1.097USD per EUR today.

TheFonz@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 15:10 collapse

As of now at 17:00 Rome time: 0.90 USD / 1.00 EUR. That is a really big drop

vxx@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 16:13 collapse

No, it’s at 1€=$1.105.

You looked at $1=0.905€ instead

TheFonz@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 18:46 collapse

Oh shit youre right. Good catch. I’m an american living in Europe but my clients pay me in dollars. Sucky times ahead

sudoer777@lemmy.ml on 03 Apr 05:32 next collapse

“The corporations own the government” made sense for a while, but Trump has done enough to hurt said corporations lately that I’m actually starting to question that idea (it’s definitely true for the majority of Democrats though). The only real reason I can think of where it would make sense to do stuff like this is to cause a crisis making it easier to abuse power later on.

Treczoks@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 05:51 next collapse

The corporations thought they own the government. They bought Trump into the White House. They should have known that he is mad.

ThePyroPython@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 06:13 next collapse

Nope they should have realised that even though they “own” this government, the president is communicating with a foreign server they don’t own.

zer0nix@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 06:42 collapse

The owners of the corporations own the govt. They are loyal to no company and no country. They can take their money anywhere, but so long as they are in the us they would prefer that the tax burden be shifted onto the people and off of them, with as few restrictions as possible on their own behavior.

The owners are still quite happy with trump. It’s all of the littler con voters who are hopefully now reconsidering their vote.

Treczoks@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 08:06 next collapse

The corporate sponsors are only needed for elections. No elections, no sponsors…

uienia@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 09:12 collapse

Yeah remember that the billionaires got richer during the economic cooling caused by covid

iii@mander.xyz on 03 Apr 08:51 next collapse

The only real reason I can think of

It’s mercantillism, a well studied subject.

sudoer777@lemmy.ml on 03 Apr 20:49 collapse

Maybe, but threatening your customers who are buying your exported goods doesn’t seem like a good strategy, and US-based corporations already dominate in the US, so it’s not like they’re helping the US become more powerful unless they’re preparing for WW3.

lumony@lemmings.world on 03 Apr 13:18 next collapse

How is any of this “hurting said corporations?”

Tariffs are a tax on the working class. Corporations will use this as an excuse to raise prices beyond how much their costs increase due to tariffs.

If a tariff causes a product to cost 5% more to bring to market, you’d better believe they’re going to charge 20% more to the customer.

The ruling class always gets theirs. We can thank the useful idiots among us for why things never change.

sudoer777@lemmy.ml on 03 Apr 20:22 collapse

Domestically, this is what will happen, but those corporations are also multinationals and get a large amount of money from doing business outside the US. What Trump is doing with the sort of threats he’s making to US allies is causing their reputation to plummet abroad along with their revenue. This can only go so far before competitors from EU and China take their spot and they lose all international relevance. Additionally, the tariffs will put them at a disadvantage in the global market compared to corporations outside the US which is further contributing to their loss in revenue. So if Trump’s main interest was in helping those corporations, I doubt he would be doing this.

Adderbox76@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 17:05 collapse

It’s not the corporations, it’s the billionaires that run them. Every time Trump does something that makes the stock market drop, they get richer by scooping up more for less. Than sell them when Trump says “Just kidding” and the stock market rises again.

Not to mention that all of their companies get to raise prices and blame “tariffs” in order to increase their profit margin.

It’s the entire reason they paid to get him into the white house.

Rakonat@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 05:51 next collapse

Russian asset undermining American interests and alliances. Can’t imagine why.

LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 06:37 next collapse

Ironically crashing the economy is one of the best things you can do to slow down climate change

And009@lemmynsfw.com on 03 Apr 08:27 next collapse

Trump will be remembered as the most influential US President.

bzah@discuss.tchncs.de on 03 Apr 09:04 next collapse

Imagine people in 2150 praising the visionary and benevolent president Trump who courageously lead our world to the only possible path in order to save the environment: “He fooled them all with his “drill baby drill” and they fell for it, they elected him. Of course some were suspicious that something was off, but he had a grand plan for nature to finally be restored…”

I would love to read this fiction, because reality is quite sad at the moment.

WanderingThoughts@europe.pub on 03 Apr 11:15 collapse

Trump will be remembered as the spark that caused the old world order to blow up, causing a lot of changes in the way things are done. China becomes the manufacturer of clean energy and uses their new status as having the reserve currency to stamp out all fossil fuels.

yopyop@feddit.nl on 03 Apr 09:17 next collapse

Time’s person of the year 2025 already sigh

Bristingr@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 14:31 collapse

Nah, fuck that. Don’t give recognition to that sack of shit.

iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com on 03 Apr 10:07 next collapse

Sort of like Sulla or Caesar, but without the talent?

Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Apr 12:04 collapse

More likely Nero.

phoenixz@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 14:10 collapse

Absolutely, just like Hitler was the most influential German leader ever

Cocopanda@futurology.today on 03 Apr 08:58 next collapse

Lost my job this week at an engineering firm in green tech. Let it burn.

eran_morad@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 20:56 collapse

Shit, bruh. sorry. I may not be that far behind you.

Cocopanda@futurology.today on 03 Apr 21:23 collapse

Surprisingly. I already have lined up some positive interviews. So it’s not entirely terrible if you need to look for work.

Bytemeister@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 15:00 next collapse

Wrong.

The best things you can do are invest in green energy and energy storage projects, create polices that cap (and actually punish) carbon emissions, upgrade to more efficient infrastructure… All things that take money, a functional government and a functional economy.

What we learned from COVID, is that crashing the economy does not really slow down climate change, it just hits the pause button for a little bit, and then it resumes at the same or greater speed.

astutemural@midwest.social on 03 Apr 21:34 collapse

Not wrong. But I will point out that this will funnel a lot more money to China, which has been investing much more heavily in greentech than the US has. So overall it could actually be a plus - for climate change at least.

takeda@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 18:58 collapse

Sure, but he is just crashing Western economy as Russia is preparing to invade rest of Europe.

europeanfan122@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 06:44 next collapse

What a dumbass

ynkssuxxxxxx@lemmy.cafe on 03 Apr 08:52 next collapse

Good I hope he starves americans like what they did to gaza

riodoro1@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 09:41 next collapse

GlObAL ReCESSioN

Can they fucking stop threatening us like we’re stupid children? Life has been getting more expensive worldwide for a decade and we all know now who is to blame.

I don’t fucking care about new toyota prices in the us, I want to buy potatoes in poland. Fuck off with your recessions and bullshit economies.

iii@mander.xyz on 03 Apr 17:01 collapse

and we all know now who is to blame.

Central banks?

Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 10:49 next collapse

Did you happen to notice the one country not on the list?

Here I’ll give you a hint it’s name starts with an “R” and is run by a man who’s name starts with a “P” and is currently at war with a country that starts with a “U”…

greybeard@lemmy.one on 03 Apr 12:51 next collapse

Doesn’t the US already have full sanctions with Russia? So literally no trade is happening with them, so a tarrif would be pointless? Maybe I missed trump removing the sanctions at some point in his onslaught of nonsense.

bufalo1973@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 14:41 next collapse

Penguins trade with the US?

Aux@feddit.uk on 03 Apr 19:23 collapse

Trade IS happening with Russia. Only specific companies and industries are sanctioned, everything else is business as usual.

greybeard@lemmy.one on 03 Apr 19:49 collapse

Sounds like I stand corrected.

Cataphract@lemmy.ml on 03 Apr 13:01 next collapse

I’m so sick of the bullshit misinformation that gets upvoted on this site. First, you demand tariffs on what equals to roughly 0.8% of our total imports. Second, there is no “war” currently going on between “R” and “U”. Also, I thought the “P” man ended the genocide against “R” citizens by taking power, I’m not a scholar though so link away with whatever truth burger you’re trying to peddle.

spoiler

/s definitely check links and facts before you get upset with words you don’t like lol Ok but seriously, I gotta give a shout out to Mbaye Diagne. This is a serious bad-ass, I can’t state just how bad his ass really is. Like all the bullshit movies and books of fake and made up narratives and we have this motherfucker who walked the earth. > a Senegalese military officer who served in Rwanda as a United Nations military observer from 1993 to 1994. During the Rwandan genocide, he undertook many missions on his own initiative to save the lives of civilians. Various estimates exist for the number of lives Diagne saved, ranging as high as over 1,000. > After graduating from the University of Dakar, he enrolled in the Senegalese Army’s École Nationale des Officiers d’Active. He completed his schooling the following year and eventually attained the rank of captain. He was given command of the 3rd Company of the 6th Infantry Battalion and fought in the Casamance conflict from 1989 to 1993. > Hutu extremists initiated the Rwandan genocide, targeting members of the Tutsi ethnic minority. They murdered moderate Hutu Prime Minister Agathe Uwilingiyimana, and Diagne rescued her children and secured them safe passage out of the country. He then undertook numerous missions on his own around Kigali in violation of the UN’s rules of engagement, hiding Tutsis in his car and evacuating them to UN installations. He also protected some Hutus and worked to safeguard the Senegalese expatriate community. > Because he had to pass through dozens of checkpoints manned by Interahamwe tasked with killing Tutsis and moderate Hutus, Diagne ferried at most five people on each trip,[10] often taking them to the Hôtel des Mille Collines or Amahoro Stadium, both under UN guard, for safety.[14][10] In order to get past the checkpoints, he relied on his extensive contacts among the military and militias, his ability to defuse tense situations with quick jokes, and occasional bribes of cigarettes, money and—though he was a devout Muslim—alcohol. > In one instance, he stood between an armed Hutu priest and a woman the priest was about to execute, shouting “Why are you killing this woman? You must not do this because if you do the whole world will know,” and eventually convincing the priest to let her live. > Gregory Alex, the head of the UN Humanitarian Assistance Team in Rwanda gave an explanation as to why Diagne was not rebuked: “Here’s someone who stepped out of line and [the general is] not going to discipline him because he’s doing the right thing.”[15] BBC journalist Mark Doyle befriended Diagne and knew of his actions, but omitted mention of him in his news dispatches because he feared that the Rwandan government would learn of his rescues and try to stop him. That was such a wonderful thing to run into after reading over the history of Rwanda and the Hutu and Tutsi people. Guess even during war and genocidal times you can still look for the helpers.

Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 14:23 collapse

I see we have a dirty tankie in our midst.

Redex68@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 15:15 collapse

Man is trolling about Rwanda and Uganda

IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Apr 13:58 next collapse

Wait what?

President Paul Kagame of Rwanda declared war on Uganda?

~/s~

phoenixz@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 14:07 next collapse

Nice

Cataphract@lemmy.ml on 03 Apr 14:12 next collapse

😒 , at least like put any effort forth if you’re going to steal a joke and make it shittier.

IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Apr 14:24 next collapse

Lol, didn’t even click the links, I kinda assumed it was Russia-Ukraine and just googled “countries that start with R”

Cataphract@lemmy.ml on 03 Apr 15:31 collapse

lol and I wonder why you had the idea and were inspired to play up the idea of “countries that start with R” after you just read two other comments doing the same thing.

IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Apr 15:43 collapse

www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1tsGGz-Qw0

This you? 😁

(But this just an internet comment, ain’t that deep, Mr. Peele 😉)

Cataphract@lemmy.ml on 03 Apr 16:19 collapse

yeah, guess it’s just push back to reddit enshitification. Bots and losers steal comments, people upvote the laziest shit, it all becomes shit as you chuckle out the door. I think it was after seeing your profile and just thinking you’re a comment stealing agenda-troll that encouraged me to call you out.

Thank you for reinforcing that it was a correct decision and I shouldn’t just let people like you treat other people like shit then actively shit on them some more instead of apologizing or even having one ounce of humility as a human being. But please continue virtue signaling some more in your profile about how radical and righteous you are.

Obi@sopuli.xyz on 03 Apr 15:08 collapse

Sorry, I don’t want to be shitty, but I found his joke much better, because I understood and laughed right away without needing disclaimers, spoiler texts or to click any links, it was direct and to the point.

Cataphract@lemmy.ml on 03 Apr 15:28 collapse

well the spoiler text really was just because I wanted to talk about Mbaye Diagne and you just have to hover over the links to get the joke. But I get it, different levels of humor appeal to different people. A lot easier to digest when it’s all just spelled out for ya and you don’t have to think any harder about it.

Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 14:21 collapse

I knew I’d get the ol’ switch-a-roo comments. Please enjoy one internet point sir.

phoenixz@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 14:09 collapse

Well technically R would fall under the category “rest of the world”, no?

MehBlah@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 11:01 next collapse

If the goal is destruction then trump is doing a good job of that.

brysmi@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 14:13 next collapse

The goal is to start a fire and to attend the fire sale.

Casteyes@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 15:16 collapse

It’s always the goal of malignant narcissists.

WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today on 03 Apr 11:04 next collapse

Cambodia one is based.

lumony@lemmings.world on 03 Apr 13:16 next collapse

We need a tariff on the ruling class.

Formfiller@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 14:08 next collapse

90% income tax over a certain amount. This was how they did it in the 50s….you know the days republicans keep citing as the “good ol days”

eran_morad@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 20:55 collapse

nah, bruh. we need something else for them.

OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 13:27 next collapse

I don’t have a ton of “the court is wrong” opinions, but Article 1 section 8 of the Constitution flatly gives Congress the responsibility of regulating trade and imposing tariffs. The President just doesn’t (shouldn’t) have the authority to change rates. The executive needs to execute the will of the Legislative branch.

TheFonz@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 15:05 collapse

Congress is pretty much dead. Repubs have lost whatever was the last vertebrae they had in their spine

IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Apr 14:01 next collapse

Pls 100% world wide tax.

I like to go straight to the “Find Out” phase.

👀

(Remember, when the great depression happens, its our duty to eliminate nazis)

houseofleft@slrpnk.net on 03 Apr 15:09 next collapse

There’s technically no upper limit, why not make it 10000% and really see what happens!

C45513@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 18:06 next collapse

With Nazis, it’s always the right time.

eran_morad@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 20:54 collapse

shit bruh, we could just start that process now and skip over the bread line bullshit.

phoenixz@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 14:06 next collapse

Well well well, we finally fell off the cliff, didn’t we?

Starting a trade war with the entire world, easy to win, right?

If the entire world reciprocates, which they will, you will literally wish you had just a recession to worry about. I wonder how Trump’s approval ratings will be about a month from now

gamer@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 14:14 next collapse

Trump doesn’t care about approval ratings. He has a “golden parachute” waiting for him and his buddies in Russia after he destroys America.

Bristingr@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 14:30 collapse

I was gonna say until his usefulness ends and he mysteriously falls out of a 4th floor window, but he’s too fat and heavy to fall through one, so maybe just some plutonium in his diet coke

TheFonz@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 15:06 collapse

Jim Jones was able to walk 600 adults to their death (the children, sadly, had no say in the matter). It’s a cult

AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 14:14 next collapse

Curious that Russia is missing

Ithorian@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 14:31 next collapse

It is not, Russia dont have tariffs they have sanctions… Dont be that guy

AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 14:34 next collapse

We can apply tariffs to uninhabited islands but not Russia? Fuck off.

Ithorian@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 15:41 collapse

Do you understand that sanctions applied are prohibitions? You and the other downvoters… Why would you apply tariffs if you cant sell or buy? Brains people!

null@slrpnk.net on 03 Apr 19:17 collapse

This comment implies that you can buy and sell with an uninhabited island…

You’re not serious, right? This is a bit?

null@slrpnk.net on 03 Apr 17:45 collapse

And the other countries that have sanctions but still got tariffs?

Ithorian@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 18:36 collapse

For what? If you cant trade why? Jizus fcking christ

“Following Trump’s Rose Garden announcement, a White House official told NOTUS’ Jasmine Wright that Russia is “not on this list because sanctions from the Ukraine war have already rendered trade between the two countries as zero.””

null@slrpnk.net on 03 Apr 18:47 next collapse

For what? If you cant trade why? Jizus fcking christ

That’s exactly what I’m asking you…

If the answer is “because sanctions” then explain why other countries that are sanctioned by the US still got hit with tariffs?

Russia is “not on this list because sanctions from the Ukraine war have already rendered trade between the two countries as zero.”"

And yet the US imported over $3B from Russia just last year. Which is to say, the white house lied (again).

Ithorian@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 19:39 collapse

What countries with sanctions? In 2024 the transactions between us and Russia went down 2,481.4 Million dollars relative to 2023 when the war already had began. 526M in exports and 3000M in imports, maybe this data tells you what you need to know

WraithGear@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 20:01 next collapse

I don’t see how that is relevant to the question of, ‘if other sanctioned countries are being tariffed why is Russia not tariffed’ and ‘we still traded with tariffed countries including Russia so why is Russia treated different’.

I mean these questions are largely rhetorical, we know why. The fact that we buy less from Russia is first of all you moving the goal posts from assuming we didn’t trade with them, and second not related to why countries are tarrifed.

Ithorian@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 20:33 collapse

You havent tell me a country, outside Russia, that is santionated too so its a tie ^^ Look, im not defending Trump or his administration, first of all im an European, second i couldnt care less about those tariffs because i think they will affect a lot more the Americans than the rest of world but it makes me sick people going mad over this when there is a lot of worst more problems to talk about, talking about this is going to the basic, its like talk to a simp (not your case, not insulting you or try to)

null@slrpnk.net on 03 Apr 20:47 collapse

Iran, Syria.

And what do you think “zero” means, exactly?

Aux@feddit.uk on 03 Apr 19:21 collapse

Sanctions doesn’t mean you can’t trade with a sanctioned country. The US never stopped trading with Russia.

Dremor@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 14:38 collapse

They get 10%.

KneeTitts@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 15:26 collapse

They get 10%

Im 100% sure they will not get any tariffs… a special ‘exception’ will be made for Russia

ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 14:29 next collapse

Is he acting salty about the Vietnam war or what?

orcrist@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 14:30 next collapse

I don’t think these are reciprocal. I think these are unilateral, and when countries respond, their tariffs will be reciprocal. The distinction is very important. This is a problem created by Trump, not by other countries. You don’t get to choose false language to describe it that shifts the blame.

MathiasTCK@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 18:32 collapse

Wait so if the admin is in favor of reciprocal tariffs does that mean they are asking other countries to raise tariffs against the US?

I’m gonna check this newly needed wiki page: en.wikipedia.org/…/Tariffs_in_the_second_Trump_ad…

Casteyes@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 14:37 next collapse

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c9e0b584-1ad8-4c07-9cef-6328dd436dfa.jpeg">

houseofleft@slrpnk.net on 03 Apr 15:25 next collapse

In case anyones looking at this and asking question like “Why has Cambodia been dunked with 49% when they’re clearly not a competitor to the US” or “Why is Trump claiming that the European Union has a 40% tariff on the US when the actual mean tariff on US goods into the EU is less than 5%”, here’s your answer to how these figures have been calculated.

  • Take the US trade deficit with a given country (eg. China is $292bn)
  • Take the total good imported by US (for China that’s $439bn)
  • Divide the first figure by the second! Why? Who knows! It’s a number! Less talk more first grade arithmetic (if you’re still following that gives us 67%)
  • That gives us a random number which we’ll pretend is that country’s tariff of US goods even though it’s completely unrelated in every way. We’ll divide it by two to get the new tariff rate for imports from that country. Why? Honestly if you’re still expecting there to be an answer to that question I’m wondering if you’ve been following. (that gives us 34%, well actually it gives us 33.5% but I’m not sure the Trump administration understands the idea of fractions so we’ll just round it up from there)

The “reason” behind this is that Trump seems to think trade deficits are really bad, which is bad news for the US because it’s had a trade deficit for the last 50 years. We’ll ignore the fact that based on per capita GDP it’s been the wealthiest country in the world for that time though.

Anyway, just to give everyone an idea of how completely, utterly unrelated to anything meaningful that figure is, let’s take Cambodia. The country is very poor compared to the US so can’t afford to buy anything that the US manufacters (Cambodians aren’t driving round in Teslas or IMessaging each other). Some US companies use it for clothing manufacture because labour is cheap in Cambodia (see the previous bit about Cambodia being much poorer than the US). This means that Cambodia imports close to nothing from the US compared to what it exports, giving it a close to 100% trade deficit, so we wind up with a 49% tariff on Cambodia.

I genuinely don’t understand the mindset that looks at the US’s explotation of cheap labour in Cambodia and interprets the US as the victim in that relationship, but hey-ho maybe I’m just not biggly-smart enough to understand the 4d chess moves at play here. . .

Reference (because unfortunately none of what I said was made up and that geniunely is the calculation): theguardian.com/…/trumps-idiotic-and-flawed-tarif…

ericatty@infosec.pub on 03 Apr 15:57 next collapse

Thank you for the reference, I scrolled to the bottom to check if you were copypasta-ing us before going back and reading it. We just all live in Crazytown now I guess.

Poop@lemmy.ca on 03 Apr 16:19 next collapse

Thanks for the explanation! It is unbelievable that these are the folks with nuclear codes.

bishbosh@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 16:24 next collapse

Putting on my best swiss cheese brain, maybe they are treating it ‘like a business’ and trying to do debt to income ratio? So our deficit is the debt then they look at tariffs on the imported goods as the income.

Do you know if this holds for other countries too?

houseofleft@slrpnk.net on 03 Apr 18:20 collapse

I honestly have no idea, maybe? Deficit isn’t really debt though, it just means you bought more than you sold. The US isn’t in debt to Cambodia any more than you’re in debt with McDonald’s. They just have a one way buy/sell relationship.

spicehoarder@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 18:40 next collapse

That’s a really good explanation, there’s no realistic way to make your money back from McDonald’s

bishbosh@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 20:21 collapse

Absolutely, but if one has no idea what they are talking about, they might massive brain worms about the US debt and it being caused by our budget deficit. Then they look at all these other countries and learn about the ‘deficit’ we have with them and that’s the same word, same thing, ezpz. Now you simple get a solid 50% debt to income ratio by dividing the two and cutting it in half, check mate economists.

Ledericas@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 18:22 collapse

Why does he think tariffs are equal to trade deficits?

T00l_shed@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 19:47 collapse

Run headfirst into a brick wall a dozen times and then maybe you will start to understand

superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 03 Apr 15:36 next collapse

Been browsing the conservative subreddit this morning just to see what they all are thinking. There is a surprising number of “This is a terrible idea” comments but its also funny seeing a whole bunch of republicans who now suddenly like higher taxes, inflation and stock crashes.

iii@mander.xyz on 03 Apr 17:46 collapse

In essence this policy primarily imposes taxes on businesses, severily reduced the wealth of the billionaires, properties this forum often applauds. Funny how suddenly it’s not liked.

US politics really is like picking a favourite sports team :D

kinkles@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 17:53 next collapse

Because we all know these good-natured corporations will bear the brunt of this in order to keep prices the same for US consumers.

Actually, aren’t you forgetting that Trump said the foreign countries will be the ones paying these tariffs? Take care not to step out of line with the regime.

iii@mander.xyz on 03 Apr 18:01 collapse

No! Your football team bad, mine good!

Haha I play soccer not football.

starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 18:47 collapse

<img alt="" src="https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/bba6ad9a-73a4-48e3-8c13-9a2eddb2a869.jpeg"> Just reminding people this handy button exists!

houseofleft@slrpnk.net on 03 Apr 18:27 collapse

Go Grey Socks!

Seriously though, this probably won’t affect billionaires because companies like Nike can move most of their operations overseas and avoid paying tariffs during their manufacturing process, and then just pass the cost of to US consumers when they sell to that market.

Even worse, when Trump put tariffs on washing machines (which Biden kept in place) one effect was that US made washing machines (not paying tariffs) jacked up their prices for US consumers simply because there was less competition.

It truly is a sucky world for non-billinaires.

Subverb@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 16:25 next collapse

Trump announces “Things aren’t expensive enough.”

Gates9@sh.itjust.works on 03 Apr 16:41 next collapse

<img alt="" src="https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/0dd7c2da-81a4-4dac-bbe9-4d48a3b60abc.jpeg">

FortyTwo@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 17:50 next collapse

Me, checking what the damage is: oh good, my European defence stocks went up 2 to 4 percent today while the American stocks are tanking, happy days!

Me, after thinking on it a bit longer: oh God, my European defence stocks went up while the world economy is taking a hit, better get ready for whatever’s coming

elatedCatfish@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 17:50 next collapse

Trump clearly has some feelings about Vietnam. He used his “bone spurs” excuse to avoid being sent over there back in the day. Lmao

What a pussy

ameancow@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 18:52 next collapse

He just saw that they have a massive tariff against the US going back decades and I guess he took it personally.

cute_noker@feddit.dk on 03 Apr 19:08 collapse

I think it is something to do with China using it as a proxy for their export.

selkiesidhe@lemm.ee on 03 Apr 19:17 next collapse

Putin’s bitch trying to further destabilize the world for daddy.

captainlezbian@lemmy.world on 03 Apr 21:38 collapse

I’m getting tariffed for sweeping now…