Number of people living in extreme heat to double by 2050 if 2C rise occurs, study finds (www.theguardian.com)
from MicroWave@lemmy.world to world@lemmy.world on 26 Jan 19:51
https://lemmy.world/post/42213018

Scientists expect 41% of the projected global population to face the extremes, with ‘no part of the world’ immune

The number of people living with extreme heat will more than double by 2050 if global heating reaches 2C, according to a new study that shows how the energy demands for air conditioners and heating systems are expected to change across the world.

No region will escape the impact, say the authors. Although the tropics and southern hemisphere will be worst affected by rising heat, the countries in the north will also find it difficult to adapt because their built environments are primarily designed to deal with a cooler climate.

The new paper, published in Nature Sustainability, is the most detailed study yet of how far and how fast different regions will encounter temperature extremes as human-driven global heating rises from 1C above preindustrial levels 10 years ago, towards 1.5C this decade, to 2C, which many scientists predict could occur around mid-century unless governments make rapid cuts to emissions from oil, gas and coal.

#world

threaded - newest

Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca on 26 Jan 20:51 next collapse

Number of people living in extreme heat to double by 2050 if 2C rise occurs, study finds.

IF

When. Then beyond.

Paragone@lemmy.world on 26 Jan 23:02 next collapse

Global warming IS STILL ACCELERATING, & the current planetary-equilibrium-temperature is closer to +9C, if you use the powerlaw & include methane’s CO2-equivalent.

( iirc, they only include the CO2, not the methane )

www.nature.com/articles/nature19798

Mere +2 is delusional making-believing, aka denial.

_ /\ _

MrFinnbean@lemmy.world on 27 Jan 11:07 collapse

Has there still been real concensus with the serious science people? Last time i read about this, there were two models that are most likelly going to happen, another was slow and another was fast, but nobody could really say which one is going to happen and both models were seen equally realistic. But everybody agrees that both predictions are bad for everybody.

In any case, way we should act like the faster one is the one we are going to get.

TheBat@lemmy.world on 27 Jan 12:34 collapse

Not if we die of starvation first.