Xinjiang’s Organ Transplant Expansion Sparks Alarm Over Uyghur Forced Organ Harvesting (thediplomat.com)
from AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works to world@lemmy.world on 20 Jul 02:10
https://sh.itjust.works/post/42461077

cross-posted from: sh.itjust.works/post/42460866

Xinjiang’s official organ donation rate is shockingly low. So why is China planning to open six new organ transplant facilities in the region

"The expansion suggests that the Chinese authorities are expecting to increase the numbers of transplants performed in Xinjiang. However, this is puzzling as there is no reason why the demand for transplants should suddenly go up in Xinjiang,” Rogers explained. “From what we know about alleged voluntary donations, the rates are quite low in Xinjiang. So the question is, why are these facilities planned?”

Rogers noted one chilling possibility: that “murdered prisoners of conscience (i.e., Uyghurs held in detention camps)” could be a source of transplanted organs.

This suggestion becomes even more concerning when considering the extensive surveillance and repression that Uyghurs face in the region. Detainees in the many internment camps in Xinjiang have reported being subjected to forced blood tests, ultrasounds, and organ-focused medical scans. These procedures align with organ compatibility testing, raising fears that Uyghurs are being prepped for organ harvesting while in detention.

David Matas, an international human rights lawyer who has investigated forced organ harvesting in China, questioned the very possibility of voluntary organ donation in Xinjiang. “The concept of informed, voluntary consent is meaningless in Xinjiang’s carceral environment,” Matas said. “Given the systemic repression, any claim that donations are voluntary should be treated with the utmost skepticism.”

The new transplant facilities will be distributed across Urumqi and other regions of northern, southern, and eastern Xinjiang. Experts argue that the sheer scale of this expansion is disproportionate to Xinjiang’s voluntary donation rate and overall capacity, suggesting that the Chinese authorities may be relying on unethical methods to source organs.

#world

threaded - newest

Noodles4dinner@lemmy.world on 20 Jul 02:46 next collapse

Written by the unification church (the moonies). The author is involved with the universal peace federation, a cutout of the cult.

AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works on 20 Jul 02:58 next collapse

The author is a Muslim woman who has won awards for her work as a journalist and written for several other major news outlets…

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tasnim_Nazeer

Noodles4dinner@lemmy.world on 20 Jul 03:29 collapse

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/b862f2f6-55a0-4800-8450-10800f9777ba.jpeg">

The wikipedia article for the universal peace federation redirects to the unification church article.

Shinzo Abe found out how bad the moonies are.

Keep spreading that “new cold war” propaganda.

AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works on 20 Jul 03:55 collapse

Nobody is defending the Moonies, especially not this current affairs publication owned by a Japanese media corporation. Here’s plenty of examples of them calling out the Unification Church: thediplomat.com/tag/unification-church/

Anybody can be nominated to be an ambassador for peace, it’s also associated with the UN. www.upf.org/core-program/ambassadors-for-peace

Launched in 2001, Ambassadors for Peace is the largest and most diverse network of peace leaders. As of 2020, there are more than 100,000 Ambassadors for Peace from 160 countries who come from all walks of life representing many races, religions, nationalities, and cultures

Literally she has no other ties to the Moonies/unification church, and how about the human right lawyer she directly quotes.

David Matas

Or the bioethicist and part of the coalition to End Transplant Abuses in China (ETAC)? All just cold war propaganda?

Wendy Rogers

Compliance with ethical standards in the reporting of donor sources and ethics review in peer-reviewed publications involving organ transplantation in China: a scoping review

Results 445 included studies reported on outcomes of 85 477 transplants. 412 (92.5%) failed to report whether or not organs were sourced from executed prisoners; and 439 (99%) failed to report that organ sources gave consent for transplantation. In contrast, 324 (73%) reported approval from an IRB. Of the papers claiming that no prisoners’ organs were involved in the transplants, 19 of them involved 2688 transplants that took place prior to 2010, when there was no volunteer donor programme in China.

Anyway, keep spreading that there is no genocide propaganda.

washingtonpost.com/…/trump-radio-free-asia-cuts-c…

Two months after the Trump administration all but shut down its foreign news services in Asia, China is gaining significant ground in the information war, building toward a regional propaganda monopoly, including in areas where U.S.-backed outlets once reported on Beijing’s harsh treatment of ethnic minorities.

The U.S. decision to shut down much of RFA’s shortwave broadcasting in Asia is one of several cases where the Trump administration — which views China as America’s biggest rival — has yielded the adversary a strategic advantage.

Uncovering injustice: Key stories from RFA Uyghur <img alt="" src="https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/90d6c6f4-8d13-4d56-923f-cfa49429ef67.webp">

porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml on 20 Jul 07:01 collapse

Just because that outlet publishes some articles critical of the moonies doesn’t mean that the author of this piece is trustworthy.

The “Universal Peace Federation” literally is the Moonies. See the section on UN-related NGOs: …wikipedia.org/…/Organizations_related_to_the_Uni…

Anyone can get their NGO “in consultative status with the UN”.

It’s also funny that you mention Radio Free Asia since they’re also deeply involved there.

AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works on 20 Jul 13:20 collapse

It’s also funny you’re doing some impressive gymnastics to defend a government against genocide.

Jax@sh.itjust.works on 20 Jul 14:29 collapse

They believe that you’ve got more human rights in China (the ethnostate) and Russia, of course they’re doing mental gymnastics.

ExFed@programming.dev on 20 Jul 05:18 collapse

It would appear you’re trying to argue against the contents of the above article by referencing an attribute or quality of the author. I believe we call that a genetic fallacy.

Would you like to try again?

avidamoeba@lemmy.ca on 20 Jul 06:13 next collapse

No need. This isn’t formal logic class. Knowing someone’s position and track record on an issue is a useful fact in judging the hypothetical slop they have produced on a different day. It’s not deductively valid, and therefore it’s not infalliable, but it doesn’t need to be.

To be clear I’m saying this in general. I’m not judging the information from the article.

Noodles4dinner@lemmy.world on 20 Jul 11:12 collapse

Did you memorize all the logical fallacies? Awwww, go get your gold star from the special ed teacher.

ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works on 20 Jul 15:07 collapse

Also known as: hospitals. Organ transplants are performed in hospitals.

AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works on 20 Jul 15:49 collapse

Compliance with ethical standards in the reporting of donor sources and ethics review in peer-reviewed publications involving organ transplantation in China: a scoping review

Results 445 included studies reported on outcomes of 85 477 transplants. 412 (92.5%) failed to report whether or not organs were sourced from executed prisoners; and 439 (99%) failed to report that organ sources gave consent for transplantation. In contrast, 324 (73%) reported approval from an IRB. Of the papers claiming that no prisoners’ organs were involved in the transplants, 19 of them involved 2688 transplants that took place prior to 2010, when there was no volunteer donor programme in China.