Brazil supreme court unfreezes assets of Elon Musk's Starlink, X after taking fines (www.cnbc.com)
from MicroWave@lemmy.world to world@lemmy.world on 14 Sep 11:16
https://lemmy.world/post/19758290

#world

threaded - newest

MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world on 14 Sep 11:17 next collapse
CNBC - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for CNBC:
> MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
> Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/09/13/brazil-supreme-court-unfreezes-assets-of-elon-musks-starlink-x.html

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

ObamaBinLaden@lemmy.world on 14 Sep 14:21 collapse

Who keeps downvoting bots

grue@lemmy.world on 14 Sep 15:31 collapse

Certain people here really hate Media Bias Fact Checker in particular because they believe it’s biased in favor of neoliberalism.

sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world on 14 Sep 17:11 collapse

Their "bias* ratings skew slightly to the left (e.g. in no universe is the AP left-center), and people have complained about positive ratings for pro-Israel news outlets.

ThePantser@lemmy.world on 14 Sep 11:42 next collapse

As it should be. Be a dick and not pay your fines the government will garnish your wages, just like the peasants. Billionaire gets no special treatment.

NOT_RICK@lemmy.world on 14 Sep 13:39 collapse

As much as I loathe Elon, I don’t think it’s fair to fine SpaceX for something Twitter did. Now if they were fined because they refused to block Twitter that’s different

cheese_greater@lemmy.world on 14 Sep 13:59 next collapse

Its important to pierce that veil, thats how ya get off

WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world on 14 Sep 14:09 collapse
Honytawk@lemmy.zip on 14 Sep 14:50 next collapse

Owned by the same person. So you hit the same person.

All of it could have been avoided if that same person paid their fines instead of playing the crying rich baby.

NOT_RICK@lemmy.world on 14 Sep 14:53 collapse

He only owns part of both which is why I think it’s messy. Then again if you are shareholder in one of his companies I guess you get what you deserve

Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world on 14 Sep 17:29 collapse

Societal consequences obviously don’t motivate much of the investor class, but financial ones do.

naonintendois@programming.dev on 14 Sep 15:06 next collapse

All ISPs were required to block Twitter/X. Starlink was the only one that didn’t. They didn’t charge SpaceX because it belonged to Musk but because they violated the court order.

NOT_RICK@lemmy.world on 14 Sep 15:13 collapse

If that’s the case the first bullet point is pretty misleading. Don’t see a problem with a fine in that case

Zorque@lemmy.world on 14 Sep 15:55 collapse

Sure, if only look at that one thing and go to zero lengths to understand context.

Things aren’t misleading just because you want every detail spooned to you.

NOT_RICK@lemmy.world on 14 Sep 16:25 collapse

There is nothing in this story that makes it clear that the fines were levied against SpaceX for refusing to block X. That is a lack of context

b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 14 Sep 20:35 collapse

I think every cent from that Nazi’s companies should be seized and he should be dropped off somewhere far away from shore.

sparky@lemmy.federate.cc on 15 Sep 00:00 collapse

As a taxpayer I would be happy to contribute to getting him a one way ticket off the planet.