Apple may face a mammoth fine after the EU said it violated competition rules
(www.engadget.com)
from jeffw@lemmy.world to world@lemmy.world on 25 Jun 2024 03:32
https://lemmy.world/post/16899727
from jeffw@lemmy.world to world@lemmy.world on 25 Jun 2024 03:32
https://lemmy.world/post/16899727
#world
threaded - newest
That’s over a thousand dollars!
Fixed that for them
It most likely doesn’t.
Translation: current fleecing levels will remain
You’re still free to pay us for using the cheaper services provided by others.
We’re paying close attention to find out how best to bypass the law without paying the fines
Translation: they won’t let us monetize every tiny bit of data with no compensation or even notice
Fuck Apple. Fuck their walled garden profiteering bullshit. FUCK their blatant lies about it.
This line I take issue with. EU penalties are possibly the most painful of all marketplaces worldwide.
I know, I was just being silly for the sake of being silly on that one heh.
Fining Apple tens of billions of dollars is genuinely a great start towards making it not financially viable for them to break the law, so I’m all for it!
Is the fine more than a hundred billion? If not it’s fucking chump change to Apple.
Easy for many to jump on the “fuck Apple” bandwagon, but the EU doesn’t say what they want - just “nope, it’s not that…”.
The EU Is Reaping What It Sows With the DMA: Uncertainty
Personally, I’m happy to see regulations that hold megacorps to the spirit and intent of those regulations, rather than having a dozen loopholes they can pass through. The lawyers are of course unhappy since they can’t argue in court that they met the absolute minimum letter of the law.
Thank you, this gets to the core of the problem. Exorbitant amounts of money and effort is spent to find where the letter of the law does not match the spirit of the law. Language is messy, so it never completely will. But in cases where the spirit of the law is so obvious I’m happy when it’s enforced instead of letting them off on technicalities.