Canada’s deputy PM resigns from cabinet as tensions with Trudeau rise over Trump tariffs (www.theguardian.com)
from MicroWave@lemmy.world to world@lemmy.world on 16 Dec 21:09
https://lemmy.world/post/23216387

Summary

Canada’s Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland resigned amid rising tensions with PM Justin Trudeau over Donald Trump’s proposed 25% tariffs on Canadian goods.

Freeland criticized Trudeau’s economic approach, warning of a “grave challenge” and advocating fiscal prudence to prepare for a “coming tariff war.”

Her departure leaves Trudeau politically vulnerable as his popularity wanes, with Liberal MPs and opposition leaders calling for his resignation.

Freeland, a key figure in Canada-U.S. trade relations, is seen as a potential replacement for Trudeau in the next election.

#world

threaded - newest

homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world on 16 Dec 21:43 next collapse

Hang in there Canada - don’t let the batshit right wing screw you over too.

troyunrau@lemmy.ca on 16 Dec 22:01 next collapse

I really like Freeland. This is her rage-quitting – “you can’t fire me, I quit!” due to the Liberals resorting to desperate measures to try to salvage their approval ratings. It also positions her outside the leadership structure should a leadership convention occur. I really doubt she runs for leadership though, as the next election is likely a guaranteed party implosion. But it could separate her enough for the leadership race after this one.

She is such a level headed centrist. But the right fucking frotha at the mouth whenever she does anything because she is a woman or something.

Buffalox@lemmy.world on 16 Dec 22:09 collapse

This doesn’t seem at all level headed. More like jumping ship when they need to work together.

troyunrau@lemmy.ca on 16 Dec 22:13 collapse

I’d wager there is a leadership race within two months, and she is positioned for that now.

Buffalox@lemmy.world on 16 Dec 22:18 collapse

That fits my first impression perfectly, which I commented earlier.
From this show of personality, she is not the kind of person I’d personally vote for.
Seems like she chooses to sabotage a working relation, and use that as a platform to show off for her personal benefit.

HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works on 17 Dec 16:08 collapse

Freeland has consistently stood by Trudeau for years, so her deciding to stand her ground shocked everyone. I suspect Trudeau just expected her to fall on the sword, but she gave him the finger instead.

I like her. She’s got a solid set of brass ovaries and has stood up to PP and his gaggle of wee-wees for years. But I doubt she’ll try for PM next election, especially seeing as the old boy’s network is pushing for Carney to take Trudeau’s place.

Buffalox@lemmy.world on 17 Dec 20:11 collapse

OK fair enough, I don’t know enough.

Buffalox@lemmy.world on 16 Dec 22:07 collapse

Freeland wrote that Canada needs to keep its “fiscal powder dry today” so they have the reserves for a “coming tariff war”.

I just hate when people use analogies like that. So she agreed on fiscal policies before, but not anymore?
Seems to me she is rocking the boat, while arguing they should keep dry!

I’m sorry I don’t know her, but this reeks of opportunism.

Rentlar@lemmy.ca on 17 Dec 04:21 collapse

Just a tidbit of context for you that the article glosses over here:

Freeland and Trudeau have reportedly disagreed over proposals for temporary tax breaks and other spending measures, which were meant to shore up political support, but risked forcing Freeland to miss her spending goals.

This is talking about Trudeau deciding to remove temporarily remove federal sales taxes on toys, beer, takeout and dine-in meals, probably in hopes to improve his image over Christmas and blunt the impact of the Canada Post strike. These are sudden, expensive measures that to me it makes sense that Freeland didn’t agree with it. She didn’t start disagreeing out of nowhere.

Buffalox@lemmy.world on 17 Dec 09:56 collapse

If they are in a coalition government, how can Trudeau change taxes without her?

Rentlar@lemmy.ca on 17 Dec 14:15 next collapse

He has sufficient support in the Legislature to pass it (where Freeland is only 1 MP), but Freeland was his cabinet minister in charge of the budget and the Deputy PM, who was set to deliver the Fall Economic Statement. The increased spending passed by the Legislature was going to be on her to announce the ramifications of, effectively taking responsibility for the Liberal government. Instead she resigned out of conscience.

Buffalox@lemmy.world on 17 Dec 14:56 collapse

How is she only 1 MP when she is deputy PM? IDK how the Canadian parliament works, but here you are part of the government if you have such a title. And the government agree before they make legislation. According to Wikipedia “The office is conferred at the discretion of the prime minister” So the 2 clearly have to work together.

Rentlar@lemmy.ca on 17 Dec 15:28 collapse

No, the deputy PM is pretty much the subordinate of the PM and can be fired by them at any time.

I know you are genuinely confused just because you are unfamiliar with our system, so I will try to compare it to the US one. It’s like if a US House Rep like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, also held Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen’s position, and also nominated to a title similar to Kamala Harris.

Trudeau and Freeland are not elected directly as leaders, but they were elected individually in their riding as Members of Parliament (MPs). But the leading party caucus of MPs nominates their leader (Trudeau), then the leader selects their deputy PM (Freeland) and cabinet ministers to lead governmental departments (like MacKinnon, Freeland, Holland etc.), usually following certain conventions. You can read about it here.

The spending measure passes the House of Commons and Senate (Parliament, akin to the US Congress). However, as her role as Minister of Finance she disagrees with the move, so she resigns from that. She will stay as an MP unless she resigns as that, but if she really disagrees with her party she can unalign herself from the Liberal caucus.

Buffalox@lemmy.world on 17 Dec 15:37 collapse

That sounds a lot like how it works here (Denmark), Where ministers are the actual government with the Prime minister as the leader, and a government composed min ministers from different parties is a coalition government. That cooperate because no single party has a majority.

StopTouchingYourPhone@lemmy.world on 17 Dec 14:33 collapse

No offense, but your question is really confusing. I don’t understand what her resignation has to do with the former supply-and-confidence agreement the Liberals had with the NDP.

ftr - There was never a coalition government and the NDP ended the supply-and-confidence agreement in September.

The right wing in North America flooded news stories and social media spaces with the talking point that the NDP and Liberals working together to accomplish government-related work was a “coalition government” (which they framed as a horrible undemocratic thing), but the NDP-Liberal supply-and-confidence agreement was in place to get Canadians the beginnings of dental care, affordable housing funding for municipalities, daycare, sick days for federally-regulated workplaces, etc.

Buffalox@lemmy.world on 17 Dec 14:57 collapse

According to Wikipedia: “The office is conferred at the discretion of the prime minister”
en.wikipedia.org/…/Deputy_Prime_Minister_of_Canad…

How is that not being part of a coalition government?

HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works on 17 Dec 15:58 collapse

A coalition government is created when two or more political parties work together to form a temporary alliance large enough to achieve a majority and gain the confidence of Parliament, ultimately allowing them to form government and pass legislation.

Coalition governments occur when a party wins an election with only a minority of seats in the legislature. They are often formed during tumultuous times, such as those involving political turmoil or war.

globalnews.ca/…/coalition-government-explainer-ca…