from HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works to world@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 18:03
https://sh.itjust.works/post/52874028
In a new study published in the journal Applied Cognitive Psychology, researchers identify two psychological traits common among people with a conspiracist mindset: a sense of injustice and a low tolerance of ambiguity.
The first is a low tolerance of ambiguity or TA. People with low TA find it difficult to handle stories or situations that are not abundantly clear or contain “shades of gray.” They often feel anxious when a situation is unclear or random. Conspiracy theories remove this uncertainty by providing a simple, black-and-white explanation.
The second factor is a sense of injustice. People who are sensitive to perceived injustices or who believe the world is unfairly rigged against them are more likely to subscribe to conspiracy theories. The belief that someone is “pulling the strings” or controlling the situation helps them to make sense of what is going on. For these individuals, a secret plot is a more satisfying explanation than the idea that the world is simply random and complex.
The researchers also found that people who are younger, as well as those who are more religious also have a stronger conspiracist mentality.
#world
threaded - newest
Uh…
Someone should let the researchers out of the lab occasionally…
If anyone disagreed with:
Then they either live in some random Nordic utopia, or they’re the crazy ones.
Like, an international child rape ring involving multiple world leaders is the biggest news story of the decade, but only two people went to prison over it and one is about to get pardoned.
It’s 2026 and you’re crazy if you don’t believe in at least one conspiracy.
Not all conspiracy theories (CTs) are completely wrong. I mean remember Pizzagate, where Democrat politicians met in a pizza shop basement to molest children? Twist a couple of those theory threads into reality and you get rich people (mostly men) visiting a private island to use and abuse young girls.
I think this study simply looked for generalizations of who would be most susceptible to CTs and wasn’t trying to focus on proving who is a ‘believer’.
The foundation of the study was flawed because “conspiratorial belief” isn’t always a bad thing, because real life conspiracies are a thing.
If they were looking for problematic conspiratorial beliefs, they should have used questions that correctly isolated those.
This research is completely worthless, which is so rare it’s almost impressive.
The CIA in the 1950s-80s pushed the term “conspiracy theory” to mean some crazy tinfoil hat guy worried about lizard people, in order to discredit the people who were speaking out against actual shady/illegal/immoral things that the government and big business (which are basically the same thing) were doing to the American public.
Yeah, I'm reading this thinking, "we're living in a flipping conspiracy..."
I’ve heard this before. Where does this claim come from? You can find the term conspiracy theory used as early as like the 1870s.
I’ve seen it all over. Some examples are FBI and CIA responses to people learning about COINTELPRO, Bay of Pigs invasion, The McCarthyism era aka Red Scare, about a dozen other covert CIA and military operations, advanced research for aircraft and missiles being pushed as aliens, etc.
So… Morons. Cool cool.
Growing up, I heard they were born ≈1/min, and that was decades ago. Without checking Darwin Awards, etc., I’m betting they leave this timeline far more slowly.
We’re fucked, then. 😅🤢🫡
I feel like you still need another leg, one of trust. I believe I have some degree of both the traits listed, and while I am trusting/naive/gullible at times, I feel you need to want those answers and to not push back on them to make it troublesome.
So: grievance, stupidity and gullibility.