TrueNAS build system going closed source
from Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social to selfhosted@lemmy.world on 09 Mar 23:47
https://piefed.social/c/selfhosted/p/1860178/truenas-build-system-going-closed-source
from Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social to selfhosted@lemmy.world on 09 Mar 23:47
https://piefed.social/c/selfhosted/p/1860178/truenas-build-system-going-closed-source
Readme updated today:
This repository is no longer actively maintained.
The TrueNAS build system previously hosted here has been moved to an internal infrastructure. This transition was necessary to meet new security requirements, including support for Secure Boot and related platform integrity features that require tighter control over the build and signing pipeline.
No further updates, pull requests, or issues will be accepted. Existing content is preserved here for historical reference only.
https://github.com/truenas/scale-build
Wondering if this is just the first step towards doing a minio in the future.
#open source #selfhosted #truenas
threaded - newest
Always blaming security bullshit. I anxiously await a community fork.
Next step is requiring a subscription.
Volker Theile (lead dev of FreeNAS 2006-2009) maintaines OpenMediaVault, based on debian, version 8 was released recently. Not a drop in replacement, and it has its own quirks, but no evil company in the background
I’m running an early version of that on a 16 year old ARM board NAS, the NAS has 256MB of RAM and OpenMediaVault runs great on it.
Security through obscurity isn’t security.
There goes my excuse for not giving up and just paying for Unraid.
Unraid pay system switch made me never want to use them
Odd choice of timing… I wonder if they are sitting on a cache of hard drives.
Truenas went to shit when they killed BSD support, the OS it was founded on
TIL. Now it’s based on Debian.
I ordered a TrueNAS system from iXsystems a few years ago, and the reasoning they gave me is that Linux has better driver support, especially for home users.
Whether that was actually the reason, I have no clue. But that’s what they said.
Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:
[Thread #153 for this comm, first seen 10th Mar 2026, 00:40] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]
Are they lying about secure boot being a reason or can I go back to thinking SB is part of Microsoft’s EEE attack on software freedom?
It can be a bit of both.
I don’t think secureboot is an attack on freedom exactly (and it’s certainly not an instance of EEE), but I definitely think it shouldn’t be Microsoft holding the keys.
@tabular @Ek-Hou-Van-Braai They are lying. Debian supports Secure Boot and remains open.
Although "related platform integrity" stuff might be something they're being forced to include by a government agency or paid to include by another company.
XigmaNAS is still being developed and is a fork of the original FreeNAS code before iX acquired the name.
There are alternatives