Keep Android Open (Stop Google from limiting APK file usage) (c.org)
from Duckling5746@lemmy.today to selfhosted@lemmy.world on 10 Jul 17:27
https://lemmy.today/post/56311226

#selfhosted

threaded - newest

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus on 10 Jul 18:04 next collapse

@duckling5746@lemmy.today as a reminder the reason this is related to self-hosting should be obvious, whether in the title or the post text.

For this one, I’ll note that this is key to self-hosting, and I think many know it. Many, myself included, use f-droid or similar 3rd party repos to manage the apps that we use with our self-hosted setup. With this change, many of the current apps we enjoy using will either need to register with Google, or essentially become unused. While there is a way to still do it, it is really messy, and requires an absolutely wild number of steps + 24hr “cooling off period”. Its ridiculous.

Personally, I’m leaving the android ecosystem one way or the other. It may be using an android phone and hotspotting for another device running PMOS or similar, or getting a Moto with Graphene, whatever, but this change is impactful and horrendous.

placebo@lemmy.zip on 10 Jul 18:16 next collapse

Petitions are useless.

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus on 10 Jul 18:30 next collapse

Eh, I wouldn’t say useless.

I’d say they only account for user sentiment at best. Which can have an impact, but I’d say incredibly unlikely that there will be an impact on this one.

Not using android as much as possible will have a much higher impact though.

Ooops@feddit.org on 10 Jul 19:04 next collapse

Petitions are useless

Protests are useless

Governments and corporations conspire to implement surveilance knowing what comes next

<-- we are here

Actual resistence

xSikes@feddit.online on 10 Jul 20:27 collapse

Well put

DandomRude@lemmy.world on 10 Jul 19:53 collapse

That is simply wrong. Public pressure can certainly be effective. In any case, it’s definitely better than doing nothing at all.

placebo@lemmy.zip on 10 Jul 20:14 collapse

Public pressure can be effective, but this isn’t public pressure. This is the “click a button if you agree” type of action. Online petitions are extremely ineffective unless they’re part of a broader, stronger campaign. This petition isn’t part of anything in particular.

From what I see, some student started it and there are no goals, and no planned actions. According to change.org, this petition mentioned in a medium.com blog and some tech website most of us have never heard of. That’s not much.

It’s just a place to vent your frustration.

it’s definitely better than doing nothing at all

It makes one feel better because it gives people a false sense of accomplishment.

Look, vote if you want, I just think this is off-topic and isn’t directly relevant to self-hosting. Hence the comment.

AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social on 10 Jul 23:32 collapse

The petition is only one part of the puzzle.

Keep Android Open also says to contact your regulators and fill out Google’s developer verification survey, both of which either directly affect Google by influencing internal processes, or put regulatory pressure on them to back off.

The Change.org petition is moreso just a way to count overall total supporters, and add one more lever of pressure that can be leveled against them. (e.g. instead of “we’ve had a lot of people contact regulators” it’s “218,000 people are actively taking the time to tell you they don’t like this”, can be cited by lawmakers, advocacy groups, etc)

That said though, I do agree that a change.org petition on its own is… generally ineffective most of the time.

Bristlecone@lemmy.world on 10 Jul 19:26 next collapse

Nah! If they kill it Linux mobile will get better!

lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org on 10 Jul 20:10 next collapse

Only if efforts can transfer over, which means devs currently standing on the paid side of Google!Android would have to move over to develop Linux mobile and develop for Linux mobile.

shonkyshonky@piefed.blahaj.zone on 10 Jul 20:11 collapse

the year of the Linux smartphone

anon_8675309@lemmy.world on 11 Jul 00:31 collapse

2047

lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world on 10 Jul 19:29 next collapse

All this effort going towards “saving” green fascism when we should be pouring these efforts into Linux

marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today on 10 Jul 21:07 next collapse

That’s great and all but the current linux phone offerings are… not suitable for general public use. The iPad generation will simply not be able to use them in their current state.

NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net on 10 Jul 21:12 collapse

We were so close to a phone usable by non-enthusiasts with the Nokia N1. The Nokia Linux phones were killed when Nokia hired a former VP at Microsoft to be their CEO. I’m still bitter.

DosDude@retrofed.com on 10 Jul 21:23 collapse

Jolla, ex nokia employees, just sent out their first batch of the Jolla phone. It uses sailfishOS, a Linux based operating system capable of running android apps.

I’m in the wait list for my own.

LostCarcosan@lemmy.today on 10 Jul 21:38 collapse

Unfortunately not available for in the US :(

I want one so badly

DeathByDenim@lemmy.world on 11 Jul 01:10 collapse

I’m in Canada. I got myself a Sony Xperia and bought a Sailfish licence for it so I could get the Waydroid integration and predictive text keyboard. Works pretty well. So if you are interested in the OS rather than the hardware, that could be a route to go.

Technically, the licence is not for sale in Canada (or US), but meh, it did work at the time. Probably still does.

Anyway, I quite enjoy Sailfish. Been using it for about 4 years now or thereabouts. There’s a fair number of native apps, especially with Chum and Storeman. With Waydroid, many Android apps work too, though definitely not all.

mhzawadi@lemmy.horwood.cloud on 10 Jul 21:45 next collapse

You do know that android is Linux under the hood right?

So we have a Linux phone now, it’s just got a crappy front end on it

undrwater@lemmy.world on 10 Jul 23:09 next collapse

It’s Linux-ish under the hood really. No Android device I’m aware of is running the vanilla kernel.

garbage_world@lemmy.world on 10 Jul 23:49 collapse

If android is linux, watchOS is unix

Zorque@lemmy.world on 10 Jul 22:42 collapse

There’s diminishing returns, and we have lives outside our phones. Well, most of us. We can put a limited amount of time and energy into this, but pushing Linux requires a great deal of effort and time.

Not saying we shouldn’t also do that, but in the mean time fighting to keep the options we do have less shitty shouldn’t be completely abandoned.

unitedwithme@lemmy.today on 10 Jul 19:43 next collapse

I don’t get it, how tf they gonna stop you on phones that already exist?

A. You can disable any new OS or device updates from Google.

B. You can keep your existing phone on Android 16 or prior (hell, I’m on 12)

C. Use alt OS like Graphene, Lineage, Iodé, /e/OS, CalyxOS (they’re back!!), etc

D. Sign out of Google on your phone, install F-Droid or something from APK package on FF derived browser.

I’m sure on brands new devices with that patch, plus anyone who doesn’t disable the auto updates will be blocked. But no way no how can Google stop us all!! 🖕🖕🏻🖕🏿🖕🏼

i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de on 10 Jul 20:01 collapse

A. It’s not an OS update. It’s part of Google Play Services.
B. I’m pretty sure this applies even on Android 12 because it’s Google Play Services. Years back, Google started moving functionality like this into Google Play Services so your phone could get new features even if you had a bad manufacturer and OS updates were months or even years behind. It was introduced as a feature then.
C. This does work, but some apps (notably banking apps) block non-Google Android, even if there is no legitimate security reason for doing so. This will vary by OS and even phones running the same OS. Official GrapheneOS builds for officially supported devices probably have the best compatibility with apps in terms of the apps not blocking your phone. Maybe there are some rooted phones that patch apps to bypass “integrity” checks. Some features of your phone just will not work, even if you have a third-party OS with official support for your phone (contactless payments). Hopefully the EU gets on this and at least Europeans or people who can trick their phones into thinking they are Europeans will get some of their control back.
D. Most people can’t live without the apps that are available only on Google’s store or that require Google Play Services. That’s most apps. Even if you don’t need those specific apps, you will need to deal with other stuff like setting up Unified Push if you want to receive timely notifications. My parents are not going to set up a Unified Push gateway.

Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it on 11 Jul 07:28 collapse

Most people can’t live without the apps that are available only on Google’s store or that require Google Play Services

Example of that: governments apps, like the eID app for the european eID (which, it’s not a must for everyone but it may be for some specific people or just everyone in a country)

yucandu@lemmy.world on 10 Jul 20:16 next collapse

A 24hr waiting period to use a competitor’s product has to be one of the most blatant anti-competitive behaviour in history.

aesthelete@lemmy.world on 10 Jul 21:09 collapse

If only the founding fathers had written the right to bear apps shall not be infringed in an amendment.

Oh well can’t change the ancient text now, just have to be governed by it forever. 🤷 (It’s a shame the ancient powder-wigged wizards that wrote the constitution weren’t clairvoyant.)

Bacano@lemmy.world on 10 Jul 21:49 next collapse

If only there were some way to change the ancient text. Some sort of amend-sion. Surely our benevolent leaders would have figured something like that out by now. I guess we’ll just have to keep voting and hoping every four years

aesthelete@lemmy.world on 10 Jul 22:07 next collapse

We’ve tried nothing and we’re all out of ideas

Harmonics041@feddit.uk on 11 Jul 09:08 collapse

Or just call a constitutional convention and write a new one.

DataCrime@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Jul 05:01 collapse

That’s it gents! Wax up those mustaches, load the cannon with grape, storm the White House! We’ll give those bastards a day of reckoning that won’t soon be forgot.

Also kilts and face paint 🤣

epyon22@sh.itjust.works on 10 Jul 20:44 next collapse

Really starting to wonder what they signed with apple to get RCS. Seems to be they sold the soul of android.

ripcord@lemmy.world on 10 Jul 21:51 next collapse

Wait so you’re somehow trying to blame THIS on Apple too?

AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social on 10 Jul 23:33 collapse

In what way does this have anything to do with RCS or Apple lmao

epyon22@sh.itjust.works on 11 Jul 05:50 collapse

Google apple agreed to increase android security for the deployment of RCS to both platforms. This directly looked like enforcing root detection and safety net(now play integrity) enforcement to use RCS. I’m speculating restricting side loading is also part of that agreement. It would make sense considering it’s forbidden on apple.

AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social on 11 Jul 05:59 collapse

Sorry, but do you have a source for this at all?

As far as I can tell, they have added some Play Integrity checks (with root detection being part of that), but the reason was cited as spam prevention, and I can’t find anything claiming they had any sort of agreement with Apple to do so.

They kept pushing for Apple to implement it, but I don’t know of any cases of them making any promises about what they’d do on their own platform in order to convince Apple or anything like that.

aesthelete@lemmy.world on 10 Jul 21:07 next collapse

please just make an android alternative

I want a phone that isn’t a closed ecosystem race to the bottom shit phone

ripcord@lemmy.world on 10 Jul 21:49 next collapse

OK but that is about a 10000x bigger project

jabjoe@feddit.uk on 10 Jul 22:04 next collapse

There are, but the market is rigged by monopolists. And things like banks increasingly require apps that won’t even run on customer Android ROMs easily.

The regulators are needed here.

lemmysmash@piefed.social on 11 Jul 02:34 collapse

The problem with regulators is that they a) gladly suck corporate dicks, b) gladly opt-in for the same authoritarian methods of population control, and c) gladly ignore common sense altogether.

karlhungus@lemmy.ca on 11 Jul 03:17 next collapse

“a” has a name: regulatory capture.

Regulators have in the past fulfilled their role, they’ve just been hamstrung.

jabjoe@feddit.uk on 11 Jul 07:58 collapse

That is also because we let the companies get too big. We need to break them up. The market is completely dysfunctional. It is feudalism right now.

realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip on 10 Jul 23:29 next collapse

I’m pretty sure that custom roms will remove that 24hr wait period from their binaries. Android is still open source and removing a check isn’t going to be very hard for them.

The tech ecosystem is as open as you can. Use linux. Use SearxNG. Use graphene or other custom roms. There’s options out there, you just have to start adopting them instead of just complaining online about having no choice.

garbage_world@lemmy.world on 10 Jul 23:48 next collapse

AOSP is open source, android isn’t

AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works on 11 Jul 08:50 collapse

Not everybody has a choice. I’m currently on grapheneos, but it looks like I may be forced back to android due to national ID requirements.

AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml on 11 Jul 09:28 collapse

I guess one solution to that is to have a second used or ultra low cost phone just for your personal ID and banking stuff. But then it’s no longer really mobile lol.

atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone on 11 Jul 00:03 next collapse

i hope linux phones succeed

rtxn@lemmy.world on 11 Jul 00:08 next collapse

All of the alternatives eventually run into the same “Will my banking app work on it?” problem. The absence of a healthy app economy is the one thing that can’t be fixed by throwing software engineers at it, and it is what caused the death of Windows Phone.

anon_8675309@lemmy.world on 11 Jul 00:29 next collapse

They should work in a browser no?

PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social on 11 Jul 02:11 next collapse

Not for things like check deposits, unfortunately

Andres4NY@social.ridetrans.it on 11 Jul 05:19 collapse

@PabloSexcrowbar @anon_8675309 When my bank _doesn't_ allow check deposits via website, I will switch banks. Ain't installing a stupid app for a _bank_ of all things, and why would I bank from a device that I could accidentally lose at the grocery store?

AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works on 11 Jul 08:44 collapse

Many banks require apps for 2FA. This varies greatly by country.

Shumina@lemmus.org on 11 Jul 02:28 next collapse

God I fucking LOVED my windows phone. Nokia body, windows OS, and no one fucked with making viruses because eleventeen people bought one in total.

DataCrime@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Jul 04:55 next collapse

🤣 Man… that phone from The Saint with the slide out full sized keyboard though. Peek Nokia.

xelar@lemmy.ml on 11 Jul 07:08 collapse

Lumias before Microsoft’ acquisition were adorable phones.

vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de on 11 Jul 04:01 next collapse

my banking app already doesn’t work on my phone, because it doesn’t like termux:x11 and an autoclicker i have installed for an idle game

DataCrime@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Jul 04:52 collapse

Right. It wasn’t the zune guy, limited adoption, Microserfs killing the platform after 7 years or a general lack of interest, a climate of distrust after 10 years of garbage operating systems with new logos and the same Windows NT internals…

DataCrime@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Jul 04:48 next collapse

Rejoice. As an Android owner, you have options of And-nodroid 😉

Mubelotix@jlai.lu on 11 Jul 07:13 collapse

The issue is the hardware, we already have software

lechekaflan@lemmy.world on 10 Jul 23:30 next collapse

Fuck you Pichai. They should be sued.

l3mming@lemmy.world on 11 Jul 02:56 next collapse

The number of times that signing an online petition has prevented the plans of an evil corporation is exactly zero.

karlhungus@lemmy.ca on 11 Jul 03:12 next collapse

Companies have reversed unpopular decisions in the past (just saw a thing about Facebook reversing some AI thing). So there may be some possible chance of them reversing this decision. I’m not hopeful but the cost is cheap, and it has a better chance of success than doing nothing

DataCrime@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Jul 04:45 collapse

Hence the proliferation of spam… It cost nearly nothing to do and has a very limited chance of return… And yet my inbox has still got 10,000 messages in it which I do nothing about.

coredev@programming.dev on 11 Jul 03:13 next collapse

I am not so sure. It creats activity, being passive is worse. We should encourage all type of protests, even petitions.

blargh513@sh.itjust.works on 11 Jul 03:24 next collapse

Fire also creates activity.

GreenKnight23@lemmy.world on 11 Jul 03:44 next collapse

at the molecular level at that.

DataCrime@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Jul 04:44 collapse

I’m highly active at a molecular level doesn’t mean I’m getting shit done 😊

Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Jul 09:50 collapse

It dissipates righteous indignation by making sure that people feel the satisfaction and the release of “doing something” (and thus not act any more forcefully) whilst said “something” is the least impactful thing imaginable.

It ultimately makes those who would do more do less instead.

Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it on 11 Jul 07:23 collapse

There are already some movements, like #Keep Android Open that ask to contact local regulators and law makers, this petition is useful to have a concrete number of people that agree and that can be used officially

percent@infosec.pub on 11 Jul 04:15 next collapse

I genuinely appreciate the cause, but to sign this, I have to provide PII, agree to their terms of service and privacy policy, and get automatically opted-in to their mailing list that I’ll have to unsubscribe from later.

So to petition against this shitty tech stuff, I have to go through this other shitty tech stuff. It sucks how normalized this all has become.

justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Jul 07:04 collapse

here it makes at least some sense to verify that each person voted once. the mail list stuff is of course to much and should be optional from the beginning.

DataCrime@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Jul 04:43 next collapse

This feels like the last stop for this. I swear it got posted 3X a day to every other sub for weeks last year.

Am I ignoring the actual post and just looking at the logo because I own a 7 year old iPhone —also yes.

muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works on 11 Jul 07:26 next collapse

You aren’t going to keep Android open. Respond by shoring up Linux phones.

Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world on 11 Jul 08:13 next collapse

or making a cydia-style open source repository style app store that’s accessible through custom firmware.

Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Jul 09:46 collapse

Not only would that solve this little problem, it would reduce Google’s power and remove one’s data from the claws of US authorities (were the Patriot and Cloud acts let them mass track everybody using a Google product).

Just make sure you chose a non-US Linux phone.

Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world on 11 Jul 08:12 next collapse

Start working on a Cydia-like app for android or graphene. Look into the development of how to code an open source repository style app store that’s accessible through custom firmware. if one person can make one for the iphone via a custom firmware then, we can 100% do the same with android.

[deleted] on 11 Jul 08:19 next collapse
.
Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world on 11 Jul 08:20 next collapse

MAKE AN OPENSOURCE STORE THROUGH CUSTOM FIRMWARE DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH Example: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cydia

“In August 2009, Wired reported that Freeman claimed about 4 million, or 10 percent of the 40 million iPhone and iPod Touch owners to date, have installed Cydia.[17]”

Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Jul 09:43 collapse

Most online petitions are nothing more than a way to safely (for those targeted and for those amongst the authorities who support them even against the public interest) dissipate the common people’s righteous indignation, by making them feel like they “did something” whilst said something is just about the least impactful thing imaginable.

(Some official ones, for example those mandating parliamentary sessions on the subject if they reach a certain threshold, might not be so, though its unclear as it really depends on the legislation around it allowing politicians to just ignore it at will)

This bullshit will require a lot more than adding your name into a list on some corner of the web in some legal jurisdiction where they’re free to sell your private information.