from curbstickle@anarchist.nexus to selfhosted@lemmy.world on 07 Jun 14:20
https://anarchist.nexus/c/selfhosted/p/716442/revisiting-rule-3
Hey everyone, as I previously mentioned the rules here are up for debate, and I’d like to start with the problem that led us all here:
3) Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it’s not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Breaking it up:
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting
Kind of obvious for the community, but perfectly fine to note.
There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing.
Without listing anything here, I think this is pointless and unhelpful. I’d also note that hardware is intrinsic to hosting your own services, and we are talking about people hosting at home, which makes “home computing” here rather confusing. We host these things for our home computing typically. The intention I think was “This is not your generic linux help desk or buildapc”, but that doesn’t come through very well.
If it’s not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
I like this not from a moderation perspective, but more of a post clarity perspective. Whats obviously related to selfhosting to the OP may not be obvious to people visiting that post.
Here’s what I propose as a revised rule 3:
Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Be prepared to explain to others why it’s related to self-hosting if asked.
Please discuss! Happy to have any additional input on this.
In the meantime, I’m striking out the middle of rule 3 until there is some consensus on wording.
Edit: Its/it’s typo
#selfhosted
threaded - newest
My personal thought as a lurker trying to learn enough through osmosis to start her own set-up is that hardware concerns are fine as long as they still relate to self-hosting in some fashion. “What hardware setup would be good for beginners looking to self-host a Google Drive alternative on a budget?” is self-hosting, fine, and the type of thing I would bookmark for my own reference. “Anyone have advice on cannibalizing an old laptop to DIY a mini PC?” would really not be self-hosting, even if your plan is to use the resulting mini PC to self-host a server.
I’d also be inclined to treat posts that are off-topic but have a selection of informative high-effort comments by locking them and sharing them to the appropriate community for further discussion there vs. removing them entirely.
Which is to say, yes, I like your proposed revision.
Agreed, and in specific:
I agree entirely on locking and redirecting. One thing to note is I would encourage users who know of a better home for that post to also recommend it. I have no intention of locking a thread thats tangentially related without a realistic/reasonable place to redirect them to, or I think the effort overall would be counterproductive.
I’d also like to note some good communities in the sidebar that may be helpful, but for example on the hardware side I’m drawing a blank. !hardware@programming.dev is mostly news/kit posts, same with !hardware@lemmy.world. So I’d welcome ideas here as well.
Agree. Hardware’s is also a good chunk of self hosting and it should be open for discussion. As far as it’s centered around using that hardware for self hosting
I thought I had replied to you as well, but apparently not…
Any issues with the language noted above? I think it meets exactly what you’re mentioning
No issues for me!
Sounds reasonable approach to me. Also I’d include VPS and other cloud services too. “Is this VPS enough to run NextCloud” is a perfectly reasonable question for this community just like “is my old thinkpad good for…”. I don’t think there should (nor can) be a hard rule about what hardware to use. Questions obviously outside of self hosting (e.g. “what GPU I should by to play minecraft”) should go elsewhere but otherwise I don’t think there’s even a real need to limit activity.
And also there’s a half a dozen of posts here daily (unless mods remove posts really efficiently). My opinion is that even if the post could go to some other community but leans to self-hosting side of things it can stay. Maybe if there was tens or hundreds of posts daily it would make more sense to limit what goes, but as things are now I don’t think any kind of (in a lack of a better word) gatekeeping is beneficial to this community nor anyone else.
Agreed on all counts. I think completely removing the middle section and modifying the last part leaves it open on options, inclusive of VPSs, and allowing people the opportunity to explain if its not clear keeps it flexible and allows users to ask why its relevant.
I also think posts that blatantly don’t fit get downvoted rather quickly, so getting into specific lists of “what qualifies” and “what doesn’t” just doesn’t make sense.
I’m mostly a lurker. I’ve also been selfhosting for at least a decade, and I’m a professional in the IT sphere.
I wholeheartedly support this rule change. Hardware is a big part of selfhosting/home labs. And for some people, it’s a hard leap to make.
If we end up seeing lots of redundant posts (e.g. “Can I use my old laptop to host stuff?”), we can always start an FAQ or something. But until and unless it becomes a problem, keeping the rule simple sounds perfect.
FAQ, even a wiki absolutely.
There is a critical mass though, as you note, where that becomes helpful and worth the effort.
As others have mentioned here, there is a lot of natural overlap with vps renting, hardware re-use, gerenal approaches to managing infrastructure, docker, and Linux in general. I don’t even mind networking questions here.
When questions stray in that aren’t really that relevant, like beginner Linux questions, someone is generally nice enough to point to a more appropriate community.
What I think wastes time in this community are the gatekeeping topics like “your vps isnt self-hosting”.
Exactly! These things are generally self-regulating, so once a more appropriate community is pointed to, its sensible to lock comments (but not delete - the question will likely come up again, and its good to have it searchable).
I’ve always felt that if you are soliciting recommendations for self hosting equipment, why not ask self hosters? I would say that 99% of all equipment threads that get posted here are directly related to beginners or even seasoned vets, asking 'what kind of equipment world I need to run ‘xxx stack’. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a thread where the OP was building his next gaming machine asking for recommends.
The whole gatekeeping about the strict definition of ‘self hosting’. Self hosting is a huge conglomeration of different approaches. Sometimes, especially with beginners, outright buying a proper piece of equipment to use in your residence might be problematic, or cost prohibitive. However a small, $30 USD/year VPS might fit for getting your feet wet, or even on into the future. In past lives I have started, modded, forums. I used to be a mod at reddit for quite a while of a good handful of subs like De-Google/De-Amazon/ all the De-(corporate services). I seriously despise gatekeeping. I think we can all co-exist whether you have a full blown rack in your closet that dims the neighborhood lights when you power up, a small VPS, an RPi, or a repurposed disposable vape-server (which was pretty doggone impressive).
I honestly haven’t seen too many completely off topic threads started here. There are a few. There was the Anonymous recruiting thread, a lost Lemmy with children down on his luck, and a few others. However, for the most part, people who bypass reddit and navigate all the way to Lemmy c/selfhosting are pretty much within the realm of selfhosting.
I believe in being encouraging and positive, even if the topic of discussion is something I’m not really kosher with. We’re all, I’m assuming, fully autonomous adults capable of making our own decisions…and living with them.
OK thats hilariously fun, and I think would 100% be a fit.
I know of folks running their lightweight stack off balcony solar - and I think that is relevant too and would upvote posts about that if I saw it here.
Because after all…
*it’s
…it is related
Doh!
Thanks for catching that
I’d replace “be prepared to explain to others” etc with
“Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to selfhosting”
Be prepared is a bit vague. Your preceding explanation calls out that what is in the poster’s mind is often not clear to others, and the rules are there to remind people of the standards required. My suggestion is still a little vague, but I suspect anything blunter might cause offence.
A good point and I like the phrasing
I do think its valuable to note somehow that users are absolutely allowed to question, but maybe I’m overthinking it in that regard.