Declaration of scope
from MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip to programming@programming.dev on 13 Jun 15:20
https://lemmy.zip/post/66082776
from MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip to programming@programming.dev on 13 Jun 15:20
https://lemmy.zip/post/66082776
I never see in public git projects something like a declaration of scope. There’s also no convention, unlike a README.md (which rarely contains some sort of scope definition) or LICENSE file.
Is this unusual in open source projects, that you first define what you want and not want in your project and how you want to do it, to combat scope creep and sabotaging yourself?
I’m in a postition in live (short of a burnout) where it’s actively a pain to just start things and then wing it; i even add a scope comment to larger shell scripts.
Maybe it’s experience, because i already know that i’m then not satisfied afterward or (in case of shell scripts) just create a unfinished mess.
Nobody else? Or am i looking for the wrong term?
#programming
threaded - newest
I rarely even add readmes or licences, I like writing code, not polishing it.
Some projects include in the readme some mentions of goals and non-goals. And I also think it is pretty sane and transparent for both the mantainers and the users that these explanations exist.
Yeah, but some do and it’s not usual.
As software engineers, an SRS doc is a very good friend of ours. just create a standard SRS doc and link to it in the readme.
I always start my projects with the SRS
I always start with defining requirements, and then I follow with a bunch of pseudo code. Its how I do things at work too. I like getting the ideas and structure out before I write any actual code or I get stupidly distracted.
Same here. Just wondering why there is no format/convention for that, since we can’t be the only ones.