Separate community for AI coding?
from codeinabox@programming.dev to programming@programming.dev on 01 Feb 08:30
https://programming.dev/post/45013854

I’ve been thinking, would it be worth creating a separate community for AI coding related articles and discussion? I know there is !Aii@programming.dev, however AI coding has a lot of overlap with !programming@programming.dev.

I know some people have expressed they aren’t interesting in reading these articles, so a separate community would make it easier for them to filter them out. Rather than simply vote them down as they aren’t interested in the topic.

Or is it better to have broad communities in Lemmy given the current number of users?

#programming

threaded - newest

cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de on 01 Feb 08:36 next collapse

Although I am very, very sceptical about the value of LLMs in the programming context this is now a reality that we have to face. Looking the other way won’t solve the issues surrounding the topic. I don’t think a separate community is necessary or helpful.

abbadon420@sh.itjust.works on 01 Feb 08:49 next collapse

I think !programming is not the place for ai-programming related content. Most people in this community will just downvote or ignore anything concerning ai-programming, so that the topic will never have a chance to be discussed in this community.

So if you want to make it possible for interested people to talk about the subject, a dedicated community is a must.

ElBarto@piefed.social on 01 Feb 21:33 collapse

Is this answer generated? It doesn’t say anything OP didn’t address already.

abbadon420@sh.itjust.works on 01 Feb 21:43 collapse

No, I’m just a classic idiot. I don’t need any of those fancy new tools for that.

ElBarto@piefed.social on 02 Feb 01:15 collapse

Hehe sorry, don’t mind me.

copygirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 01 Feb 09:00 next collapse

I’ve been tempted to make my own thread on this. There’s too many AI related posts and I, personally, really don’t want to see them. So for me it’s really a question of whether to introduce a rule to disallow AI related posts (and move them to a dedicated community), or me having to stop participating in this community altogether.

cschreib@programming.dev on 01 Feb 09:29 next collapse

As much as I dislike AI, programming is a field where there’s always something for someone to hate. E.g., should we ban C++ articles because there’s a lot of Rust fans that hate them?

Your two options are not exclusive. Just create a community to discuss AI programming, cross post to the generic programming community if you think it’s relevant, and let people upvote/downvote as they see fit.

Solumbran@lemmy.world on 01 Feb 09:50 collapse

AI “programming” is not just something that people hate.

It’s something that is wrong on a technical, moral, ecological and social scope.

It’s like saying that you don’t want racists posts to be banned because “people always complain about something, some don’t like vegetables and some don’t like racism”

codeinabox@programming.dev on 01 Feb 11:51 collapse

You can’t compare racist posts, which are a form of hate speech and a breach of this instance’s code of conduct, with discussions about topics that you don’t agree with.

Solumbran@lemmy.world on 01 Feb 12:06 collapse

AIs are effectively destroying the word, causing huge social and environmental issues.

They might not have the same individual impact, but it is unequivocally and hugely immoral.

codeinabox@programming.dev on 01 Feb 13:00 collapse

I agree with you on that point, and the same could be said about the meat and dairy industry. However I don’t think the answer is censoring discussions about cooking beef or chicken.

copygirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 01 Feb 17:00 collapse

Not a perfect analogy, but as far as a lot of people’s sentiment goes, it would be more in line with a world in which only vegan cooking methods existed, but some people discovered that you could also eat animals. In which case it would be very understandable that recipes involving meat should not be discussed in existing cooking related communities.

luciole@beehaw.org on 01 Feb 13:12 next collapse

I say yes. I’m wholly uninterested in the topic and do not consider vibe coding to be programming. It’s just the speculative art of prompting.

ElBarto@piefed.social on 01 Feb 21:38 collapse

I still have my reservations, but I’ve changed my mind about “vibe coding”.

Juniors vibe coding? Awful idea. It stunts learning. Non-programmers vibe coding? Aside from small scripts, anything exposed to the internet is a dangerous thing.

Experienced programmers who already know what they’re doing? Code assistants can be a bliss for tired fingers and wrists.

Feyd@programming.dev on 01 Feb 13:25 next collapse

I think posts about LLM technology itself can be interesting, but random self promoting blogspam from founder types and tech bros about how they’ve found the secret to using “agentic programming” responsibly is the most boring thing imaginable. So yes, if it has to exist please put it somewhere else.

Arkouda@lemmy.ca on 01 Feb 16:12 next collapse

I am all for “Vibe coders” having their own community and not associating with this one. I recommend the name “codemonkeys@aislop.dev”.

TheV2@programming.dev on 01 Feb 18:20 next collapse

Did people at !Aii@programming.dev express that they aren’t interested in reading these articles, too? Because an AI-related community on a programming-related instance semantically conveys the same environment as a community dedicated to AI coding specifically in my opinion.

codeinabox@programming.dev on 02 Feb 16:23 collapse

Thank you everyone for your input. I have created a separate community, !aicoding@programming.dev, for AI coding related discussions.