So if we're just good with careening into fascism 2.0 what does the future look like?
from Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com to nostupidquestions@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 13:26
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/48128036

#nostupidquestions

threaded - newest

SolidShake@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 13:29 next collapse

Violent protests probably. Even republicans don’t want fascism. But there is nothing we can do without a hero assassin… At least 3 of them actually.

DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works on 02 Jul 13:36 next collapse

Might wanna check how long the line of succession is

crank0271@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 13:41 next collapse

It’s starting to look like the movie “Desperado” (or perhaps the entire “El Mariachi” trilogy)

thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org on 02 Jul 13:44 collapse

can’t wait till the dude with chain gun in the brief guitar case comes to save the day…

HubertManne@piefed.social on 02 Jul 14:53 next collapse

yeah goes through every secretary.

cecilkorik@piefed.ca on 02 Jul 15:01 collapse

The French figured out how to solve that particular problem hundreds of years ago. Guillotines are efficient and reusable.

solsangraal@lemmy.zip on 02 Jul 13:51 next collapse

Violent protests

this is what the fascists want. any excuse whatsoever to declare martial law, impose curfews, ‘papers, please’ checkpoints, and ‘papers, please’ thugs going door to door, looking for anyone they don’t like so they can send them to the concentration camp.

thoughtcrime doesn’t entail death, thoughtcrime is death

Asafum@feddit.nl on 02 Jul 14:02 next collapse

We’re already at the thoughtcrime stage…

Funny how Republicans online were the ones crying about that, but now they’re salivating at the idea of deporting Mamdani for the crime of being a socialist. Can’t have those political opinions, that’s wrongthink!

Maeve@kbin.earth on 02 Jul 14:29 collapse

He's not a socialist.

Asafum@feddit.nl on 02 Jul 14:39 next collapse

In fascist USA anyone not actively licking the boot of a billionaire is a socialist!

Maeve@kbin.earth on 02 Jul 14:47 collapse

Yeah that's the problem with American exceptionalists getting to redefine language: it doesn't work outside our walled garden, regardless whether the fruit is nourishment or poisonous.

LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net on 02 Jul 15:20 collapse

He calls himself one, do you have cause to doubt it?

Maeve@kbin.earth on 02 Jul 15:24 collapse

I have cause to believe USA makes up their own meanings of words that has nothing to do with the rest of the world meaning. You can interpret that how you will.

LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net on 02 Jul 15:31 collapse

I’m talking about Mamdani specifically though. Or are you just assuming that based on your feelings about the US in general?

Maeve@kbin.earth on 02 Jul 15:36 collapse

And? I live here. I like Mamdani. That doesn't change the veracity of what I said. Perhaps your own feelings preclude that.

LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net on 02 Jul 15:38 collapse

I guess that’s a yes. I was genuinely curious to hear the case that he’s not a socialist but it doesn’t seem you have much basis for this opinion.

Maeve@kbin.earth on 02 Jul 15:45 next collapse

Last I heard, he was calling himself soc Dem or Dem soc, both of which uphold the capitalist class. He's proposing good work to make a few inroads but not proposing his potential constituency own the means of production which is the definition of socialism.

LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net on 03 Jul 00:57 collapse

For the record, he’s a democratic socialist, not a social democrat. These are distinct, though related movements. The difference between them, which you seem confused about, is that socialists do not uphold the capitalist class, despite your claims. Social democrats want to retain capitalism, while democratic socialists do not.

However, democratic socialists do have differences of opinion with more radical socialists on the best way to achieve the socialized means of production they aim for. They favor reform over revolution.

You are welcome to disagree with this view but it’s not a good reason to view their socialism as false or insincere.

No need to reply, since we already established that you’re not interested in good faith discourse. But I couldn’t leave this misinformation unchallenged.

Maeve@kbin.earth on 02 Jul 15:49 collapse

Here, since you can't be bothered: https://www.britannica.com/question/What-does-socialism-mean

Western source.

LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net on 02 Jul 16:33 collapse

I know what socialism means. I wanted to hear your interpretation of the facts regarding Mamdani, since this is a contentious topic, and socialism is a broad tradition. But I see now it was a waste of time to expect serious discourse from you.

Maeve@kbin.earth on 02 Jul 16:36 collapse

Good. Do your work bc I'm busy rn doing mine. Obviously that's the definition, which is obviously mine since reading about the US definition not being the definition is too much effort for you.

ryanee@fedia.io on 02 Jul 14:07 next collapse

I keep hearing this so often "they will take any opportunity to declare martial law" this so often its starting to sound like autogenocide

<img alt="" src="https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:mxc7liuon6iq5gzapmmwkq22/bafkreiawtjquvrou4ppvxwu4he5ople6e4d6bqnhdrnsh7crmavqfx4lay@jpeg">

Asafum@feddit.nl on 02 Jul 14:09 next collapse

Hey where did they get that picture of me!?

Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Jul 14:14 collapse

Better check your phone bro, I think they might be spying.

ryanee@fedia.io on 02 Jul 14:28 collapse
lurch@sh.itjust.works on 02 Jul 14:42 next collapse

yeah, that’s a weak reason against violent protests. stronger ones are:

  • the violence is often misdirected at people not able to bring change, eg. small businesses or cars.
  • the violence exhausts protesters. many of them being crippled or killed by police, until the protests are suppressed by too few motivated protesters being left.

btw cops love violent protests. they get to kill maim and torture more people than usual. it’s what many of them signed up for and look forward to with excitement. sometimes they have off duty cops in plain clothes infiltrating protesters to start the carnage. all it takes is throwing one stone near a collegue with shield and helmet to give him an excuse to go on a rampage against innocent protesters, while the infiltrator sneaks off

corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca on 02 Jul 17:19 next collapse

that’s a weak reason against violent protests. stronger ones are:

Non-violent ones are more effective, as per some study I saw a month or so back.

Netux@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 06:51 collapse

There is an agenda in convincing people that non violence works. Take a real look at how unions and civil rights actually happened. The non violent get credit after the fact to control the narrative.

Netux@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 06:49 collapse

Cops like it when it’s them being violent. They don’t do much when the opposition is armed and not concentrated in one small easily controlled area.

Maeve@kbin.earth on 02 Jul 15:10 collapse

I really love this meme. The self-defeating attitude that's been perpetuated by team Dem of "We've tried nothing that could potentially be useful and are all out of ideas!” has been swallowed wholesale, by us. Will getting ourselves out of this trap be painful, disfiguring for some, deadly for others? Sure. The other option is self-suffocating, slowly. Drowning by self-waterboarding.

CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 15:08 next collapse

That’s not a reason to avoid resistance. They created the situation. The violence is on them. Hopefully, literally.

PunnyName@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 22:41 next collapse

You can show up to a protest armed to the fucking teeth without firing off a single round. That’s how those anti lockdown fucks got what they wanted in 2020 (and one of many reasons why COVID exploded).

JandroDelSol@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 23:02 next collapse

don’t act like they’re not going to do that anyway. if no one rises up and does real damage, they’ll stage something and enact martial law

Netux@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 06:47 collapse

They said it before trump was sworn in. It will be a bloodless coup of the left allows it. The options are fascism or fight.

jjjalljs@ttrpg.network on 02 Jul 14:09 next collapse

Even republicans don’t want fascism.

They don’t? How can you tell?

Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Jul 14:17 collapse

Well fascist were socialist and socialism is communism, so obviously.

/s

ddplf@szmer.info on 02 Jul 14:28 collapse

Am I missing some elementary knowledge? How is fascism resemblant to socialism?

jjjalljs@ttrpg.network on 02 Jul 14:55 collapse

I think they’re making a joke (what with the /s), but some people will say that since “Nazi” is derived from “national socialist” it’s a form of socialism. Usually people making that claim are arguing in bad faith and/or are grossly misinformed.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 14:10 next collapse

Even republicans don’t want fascism.

A “Trump Boat Parade” in Jupiter, Florida, on Sunday was joined by neo-Nazis waving swastika flags, shouting “White Power,” “Heil Trump,” and “Make America White Again!”

What’s been truly revolting is in watching how many liberals have jumped on the fascism bus. Kristen Gillibrand is fully in bed with the Silicon Valley techno-fascists. Richie Torries can’t get enough genocide, whether its via our migrant concentration camps at home or our outsourcing of genocide to the Middle East via Israel and Saudi Arabia. Sitting Democrat NYC Mayor Eric Adams has gone all in on MAGA, after receiving pardons for his chronic misuse of public office and funds from the President. Gavin Newsom is flirting with Charlie Kirk and Steve Bannon as a podcast host. Half the 2026 Texas Dem Congressional slate is fully in favor of turning the US/Mexico border into the new Iron Curtain. The Florida Democratic Party wants a Bay of Pigs 2.

It’s Italy in 1924 all over again. Oops! All fascists.

cecilkorik@lemmy.ca on 02 Jul 14:28 next collapse

Yeah people thinking the Democratic Party is going to save them are delusional IMO. They are part of it and many of them have been working towards the same goal. They are a false opposition at best. Not all of them, some of them are legit, like Bernie, and look how he has been treated by the Dem establishment. Any real resistance is marginalized.

Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Jul 14:33 next collapse

I thought the dems could save us in 2016. I then believed they would save us in 2020. The last chance I gave them was 2024.

Ill vote in their direction only in the hopes they can hit the brakes but, overall, they prove again and again they enable this shit and take no interest in stopping it.

spankmonkey@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 14:45 next collapse

I have been voting against Republicans for nearly 30 years and still have yet to see Dems hit the brakes. They do let off the gas some of the time, and since they are the only ones who have a chance of winning they get the vote by default.

If voting wasn’t so quick and easy where I live it would be difficult to convince myself to put in the effort. It should be this easy everywhere.

FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe on 02 Jul 15:12 collapse

That’s why you gotta primary out the ones that don’t actually do their job. Like if it’s too late to primary one out then yeah vote for the dem over the overt fascist but that’s a last resort. If you have the time, check and see if any actually good candidates are running in the primaries and see if you can volunteer and help them out with their campaign. Obviously not everyone has the time or ability, but every little bit helps if you can

Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Jul 15:14 collapse

Primary them all. They’re all wet sacks.

BadmanDan@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 18:01 collapse

You guys are so delusional. You could replace every sitting Dem in congress right now with your hand picked candidates, and literally NOTHING would be different. How many times does this need to be said, YOU NEED 60 VOTES IN THE SENATE! Without 60 votes, you’re not getting transformative change. You can thank your red state voters for that.

Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Jul 18:06 next collapse

=/ I get that.

The problem i diagnose is the democrats dont care to go after 60 seats. They are all too happy fighting over a plurality and maintaining the status quo. Its not inspired and will only ever edge you out wins as you fight over the same demographics that all hate you.

BadmanDan@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 16:57 collapse

I understand that, and I agree. We do need Dems in Congress that will always push for progressive legislation and fight back against conservative nonsense. The issue is, there’s a vast amount of people in this country that want to do the opposite, and in most cases, we’re outnumbered in that regard. You have to VOTE, we have to WIN! Even a moderate Democrat can be pushed towards progressive reform. A conservative Republican will never.

Biden’s BBB was 2 votes away from becoming a reality, unfortunately, it failed. But 10 years prior to that in 2011, it might’ve been 6-9 votes away. WERE MAKING PROGRESS. But everytime republicans gain control, our progress is put on hold or reversed. We can’t allow them to keep winnning.

Netux@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 06:44 collapse

You need 51 votes. The 60 is a self made rule they can change, just like the filibuster.

samus12345@sh.itjust.works on 02 Jul 16:02 next collapse

Bernie’s Independent, not a Democrat.

Revan343@lemmy.ca on 02 Jul 18:23 collapse

some of them are legit, like Bernie

It’s really telling that every time somebody wants to point out that some Democrats are still decent, they cite an Independent

Maeve@kbin.earth on 02 Jul 14:33 collapse

Scratch a lib...

BadmanDan@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 18:02 collapse

Leftist being nice to the right is always a sight to see

Netux@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 06:45 collapse

Leftist aren’t. Dems are. The dems have been a right wing party since at least Clinton (I’m not old enough to remember Jimmy)

spankmonkey@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 14:16 next collapse

Even republicans don’t want fascism

Yes they do.

SolidShake@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 14:38 collapse

No they don’t lol. The maga cult does. But actual thinking republicans don’t want it.

TheBat@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 14:53 collapse

In other words, 0 Republicans don’t want it.

SolidShake@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 15:08 collapse

Lots of Republicans don’t like trump anymore. Lowest approved president of all time.

Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Jul 15:32 next collapse

… wishful thinking.

SolidShake@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 15:46 collapse

Easily accessible knowledge

Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Jul 15:50 collapse

Im choking, choking, on the miasma of stupidity you exude.

chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Jul 23:10 collapse

I would like that to be true, but I don’t think the numbers really support it, at least for the approval rating:

42% approve, 54% disapprove

Last updated on July 2nd 2025

He was 6th lowest approved president ever for his first term, but that was with an approval rating of 34%, which is lower than it is currently. Bottom 3 are Truman, Nixon, and Bush, with 22,24,25% respectively.

alaphic@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 14:50 next collapse

Wario, Yoshi, and Dinkey King? (Could’ve been Diddy Kong, but I think he’s been having some legal issues or something lately…)

I didn’t even know he knew Kid Cudi, either.

[deleted] on 02 Jul 16:11 next collapse
.
scarabic@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 19:55 next collapse

Only 3? Found the optimist!

swordgeek@lemmy.ca on 03 Jul 22:15 collapse

Even republicans don’t want fascism.

Um, sorry but have you been paying attention for the last eight years?

The people left in the GOP are driving at full speed towards a fascist dictatorship. It’s not Trump, it’s the entire cadre of sycophants and Nazis he’s set up to protect him.

Laura Loomer’s “Alligator lives matter” didn’t suggest that? Nor the fact that she was celebrating the creation of a new concentration camp to round up and possibly murder ALL Latinos in the US? (And selling merch to go with it!)

What about Kristi Noem filming propaganda in front of cages full of prisoners in El Salvador?

The six SCOTUS judges who are eagerly giving Trump every immunity and power he wants?

Ron DeSantis creating a second one-stop deportation centre?

The US Republican Party ARE fascists, and are ecstatic over how things are turning out.

If you call yourself a Republican and are against this, you’re either a hypocrite, or a liar.

the_q@lemmy.zip on 02 Jul 13:35 next collapse

Look to the past for a view of our future.

pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 13:40 next collapse

Eventually, the world will get tired of our shit and do something about it. It will not be pretty. Mainly economic suffocation…. That’s the only way the rest of the world can hurt the US.

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 14:15 next collapse

We’re suffocating ourselves just fine

NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io on 02 Jul 14:18 next collapse

Given how well that worked with Russia, yeah don't expect much help.

DarkCloud@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 14:22 collapse

The world’s boycott of Russia resulted in Chinese brands getting a super strong foothood there. Shows how important maintaining a country’s manufacturing base is.

Maeve@kbin.earth on 02 Jul 14:28 next collapse

Eventually we will get tired of our shit and do something about it. TF would others help us while we refuse to help ourselves? The rest of the world will contain us, much to the sociopathic capitalist class' delight.

blackbirdbiryani@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 22:05 collapse

Except y’all have nuclear weapons and the rest of us mostly don’t. When you’re done with your local genocides the US will inevitably turn outwards for a scapegoat.

Brkdncr@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 13:52 next collapse

I think the book The Fourth Turning and its sequel talk about this.

Rooskie91@discuss.online on 02 Jul 13:59 next collapse

If your curious what the right is pushing for go ahead and check out The Turner Diaries.

If you actually finish the book, wait for your rage to subside then arm yourself.

Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Jul 14:01 next collapse

Let me guess. They rape women.

stankcheez@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 15:02 collapse

Turner Diaries is a white nationalist screed about overthrowing the US government to install a fascist dictatorship that starts a nuclear war and begins a systematic purge and execution of all non-whites, Jews, and any “race traitors” who view those groups as anything other than scum

It’s vile beyond words

Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Jul 15:06 collapse

I tend to believe a society that turns inward on itself will only ever turn inward on itself until its completely gone.

In all likelihood the first bomb going off would be the end of it all. Anarchy. Destruction of every social contract.

Nougat@fedia.io on 02 Jul 15:09 collapse

I skipped to the last two words of your comment months ago.

Asafum@feddit.nl on 02 Jul 14:00 next collapse

So I actually just kinda answered this as a “joke” in another thread, but essentially:

The future: fascists, racist robots, billionaires, more fascists, bombing civilians, cutting science funding, the earth is on fire, more fascists, cutting HIV study funding, more racist robots, gutting artistic employment, more billionaires, fried donuts.

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 14:15 collapse

Oh boy donuts

aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 14:07 next collapse

Brain drain. It’s already started. Academics, scientists, and researchers are moving to Canada or Europe to do their work. As shit gets worse, the upper and middle classes will start to do the same. The underprivileged and undereducated will fight for the scraps of what’s left.

HubertManne@piefed.social on 02 Jul 14:58 collapse

Actually the lower class has a bit better chance. If you have no home to sell or money to transfer over leaving is a bit easier. If you have enough to set yourself up and then sell what you have that makes it easy. So its like people barely affording their mortgages or have decent jobs that would be hard to replace that get stuck until its to late.

TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com on 02 Jul 15:47 next collapse

Actually the lower class has a bit better chance.

gtfo

SuiXi3D@fedia.io on 02 Jul 17:46 next collapse

If you have no home to sell or money to transfer over leaving is a bit easier.

In what world does having no money make it easier to move to another country?

HubertManne@piefed.social on 02 Jul 20:37 collapse

Its easier because your costs are forward rather than in arears. You can't move before you sell the house because then you will have to pay on it while your trying to figure out expenses in a new place. You need to sell it for more than you owe and you will then need to find temporary housing where you will not have any costs if you need to leave at any particular time which tends to be more expensive. You will need to downsize to a backpacker level as part of this. Not just you but your family. Then you will be applying to try to get somewhere else which may or may not happen. You can start that before but then you might just have to abandon everything. If one has nothing to lose the process is easier. Similarly if you want to have a similar lifestyle in the new country you will have to find an equivalent and likely harder to find job in the new country.

SuiXi3D@fedia.io on 02 Jul 22:17 collapse

Bud, I can't even afford to get my car fixed to make it to the closest border. The thought of having a house to sell is a dream.

knightmare1147@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 18:23 collapse

This. I don’t think a lot of people understand the level of impoverishment we actually have.

PunnyName@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 22:44 collapse

Moving is expensive, especially to another country. Assets or not.

TingoTenga@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 14:20 next collapse

War.

SmallsJohnson@sh.itjust.works on 02 Jul 14:21 next collapse

V for Vendetta, but without V to help save us from ourselves.

joyjoy@lemmy.zip on 02 Jul 14:27 next collapse

The (significantly delayed) Bell Riots.

HubertManne@piefed.social on 02 Jul 14:54 next collapse

I often wondered how nazi germany happened given the democracy and find myself caught up in the process despite my best efforts and the efforts of many people I know.

Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Jul 15:01 collapse

The only efforts that matter going forward is for people now to give up their own comfort to secure the future for others. Either we trust each other with our lives or we forfeit our futures to authoritarian rule. I maybe only have another 30-40 years left. 20 years of “healthy” living. Its not me who’s losing out big.

Id happily donate those years to a cause that was real and not just talk. If my only choice is to lead it myself, fine, but someone needs to start following.

HubertManne@piefed.social on 02 Jul 16:44 collapse

I don't think people need to give up comfort. At least not to any reasonable level. We need to make it so that we are doing things efficiently. Passive housing using geothermal/solar/wind and such. People able to afford to live where they can be carless.

krashmo@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 18:19 next collapse

The comfortable will never rebel. No one is going to give you those things and we can’t build them without dismantling the current system. You’re going to have to get supremely uncomfortable in order to give others the possibility of having those things at some indeterminate time in the future or face a dystopian future so bleak that it will make The Hunger Games seem like a fun vacation. Either way, comfort is rapidly fading from the picture.

HubertManne@piefed.social on 02 Jul 20:43 collapse

Thats not people giving up comfort, that is them losing it. Nobody will rebel due to self sacrifice. Many act to rebel from loss of things that don't directly cause discomfort but they have the cognitive ability to see the long term consequences that will come of it.

brendansimms@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 18:37 collapse

there are very rich and powerful people who spend all of their ‘working’ time actively fighting against those things. They (clearly) would sooner support the construction of the fourth reich in america than give up profit streams like energy/housing/automotive.

devolution@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 15:47 next collapse

Yeah, Lemmy, what does the future look like?<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0caa5fe3-bda6-4200-934e-192743266ac2.jpeg">

dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 15:57 collapse

Bull. I don’t even get to have a double jump implant installed but I still have to deal with corpofascism. This is all a total rip-off.

peoplebeproblems@midwest.social on 02 Jul 16:41 next collapse

Things are going to get real fucky.

Those in power will be unable to trust each other and their employees even less. We may end up living where we work.

Diseases will be widespread, and no care will be offered to anyone but the privileged.

Famine, likely entirely manufactured, will cause massive amounts of starvation.

Modern conveniences will be slowly lost. Cars will be falling apart because no one can afford mechanics, and the lack of vehicle regulations leads to excessive accidents.

Planes will break up midaire. Widespread blackouts when shit goes sideways. Forget about medicine.

Waterways will be polluted beyond what can be boiled. Breathing in big cities will be hazardous. They will say “efficiency” but not one instance of efficiency will be observable.

Kids showing academic excellence will be abducted and sent to special indoctrination schools so that they can only benefit the regime.

Women will have rights removed. All men will have to do a two year duty in war. Church attendance will be reported to the government.

I have more ideas but I’ll stop there

Slartibartfass@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 18:22 next collapse

I think No Church Attendance will be reported

PunnyName@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 22:37 collapse

Criticism, questioning, ambiguity, or hesitance will also be reported.

brendansimms@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 18:34 next collapse

damn homie are you the heritage foundation

peoplebeproblems@midwest.social on 02 Jul 20:07 collapse

I mean I could be. 13 year old me thought of most of this stuff during his hormonal days

swordgeek@lemmy.ca on 03 Jul 18:41 collapse

Strikes me that you’ve forgotten about the rest of the world.

oppy1984@lemdro.id on 03 Jul 20:41 collapse

The rest of the world isn’t coming to help as long as we only hurt those within our borders. No one stood up to the Nazis until they started moving on other countries, even though they were already known to be committing atrocities. The rest of the world is just going to cut us off and let us burn, most of the world hates the U.S. and only plays nice for economic and military reasons.

swordgeek@lemmy.ca on 03 Jul 22:03 collapse

That’s true, but some of your dystopian ideas require the entire planet to fall into collapse and ruin. Eventually the odds are pretty good that the rest of the world (assuming we’re in decent shape ourselves) will start to provide humanitarian aide to the US.

And stating that “most of the world hates the U.S.” is definitely a sign that you don’t quite understand how we feel about the US.

oppy1984@lemdro.id on 04 Jul 03:15 collapse

I guess I’ve just given up and assume everyone would just cut us off. I’ve really only seen negativity twords the US, so that colors my view. There’s also my buddy from Japan who advised me to say I was Canadian when traveling internationally due to the negativity he’s seen directed at the US when he’s traveling Asia and Europe.

GraniteM@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 16:44 next collapse

Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable.

muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com on 02 Jul 17:57 next collapse

People have been radicalised by radical leftism this is just the pendulum swinging back the other way.

Slartibartfass@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 18:23 collapse

Lol. If you are in the us you have no idea what leftism is

CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 18:41 next collapse

It always amazes me how radical leftism keeps moving further right. Once upon a time radical leftism meant UBI and immediate radical action on climat change. Now ‘radicall’ leftism is anything left of squads of armed men kidnapping people off the street.

muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com on 02 Jul 19:17 collapse

I’d call direct calls for socialist and marxist policies extreme left. As well as extreme political correctness (a soviet term look up the history of it). If u call average people Nazi fascists enough eventually they will agreeing with you and become that.

DampSquid@feddit.uk on 04 Jul 07:34 collapse

Socialism is basically Centrist

muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com on 02 Jul 19:13 collapse

I’m in Australia I have the goddamn flag in my username.

rocky1138@sh.itjust.works on 02 Jul 18:54 next collapse

“We” are not good with it. But if you’re American you might be, yeah.

Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 02 Jul 18:59 collapse

The door is shutting. Might want to stick your foot in the gap before they lock it behind them.

LovableSidekick@lemmy.world on 02 Jul 20:20 next collapse

We’re not good with it and we hope it’s not too late to turn it around. And no, I don’t know how so there’s no point asking me.

jasoman@lemmy.world on 03 Jul 20:46 next collapse

Death, mostly death.

aesthelete@lemmy.world on 04 Jul 07:23 collapse

A big ol pile of shit.