How would one exit a black hole?
from renamon_silver@lemmy.wtf to nostupidquestions@lemmy.world on 17 Aug 13:45
https://lemmy.wtf/post/26947405

Feeling like taking a vacation.

#nostupidquestions

threaded - newest

db2@lemmy.world on 17 Aug 13:51 next collapse

You wait for it to reach a critical mass and explode. Might take a little while.

victorz@lemmy.world on 17 Aug 13:53 next collapse

Do they do that? Is that what the Big Bang was?

remon@ani.social on 17 Aug 13:55 next collapse

They don’t. They do evaporate though.

Lumidaub@feddit.org on 17 Aug 14:00 collapse

That’s a hypothesis though, right? They haven’t detected any yet afaik (which the article could make clearer in its introduction).

remon@ani.social on 17 Aug 14:04 collapse

Yeah, it mentions it at the end under the “Experimental observation” section.

Lumidaub@feddit.org on 17 Aug 14:07 collapse

Yes, I know, but realistically, many (most?) people just want brief, general information, which is what the introductory paragraph is for, no? So I’d argue it should say “hypothesised” or “predicted” somewhere in the, ideally, first sentence.

remon@ani.social on 17 Aug 14:11 collapse

It does say that it is a “model” and “predicted” in the first paragraph.

Lumidaub@feddit.org on 17 Aug 14:19 collapse

Okay, might have worded that better. It says “The radiation was not predicted by previous models” and “is predicted to be extremely faint”, not “it is predicted to exist” - and also “[it] is many orders of magnitude below […]” which sounds like a statement of fact. I realise this may be nitpicky but I don’t know if people who don’t know anything about the subject would interpret that as “we don’t really know if it even exists yet”.

ChicoSuave@lemmy.world on 17 Aug 15:29 collapse

It is difficult to be certain about unmeasured things. It would help everyone if those who don’t know anything about the subject would understand that science is about approaching clarity and the scientists are so zoomed out on some things that it isn’t always as clear as anyone wants. But scientists are still trying to answer the question. They are trying to help.

Lumidaub@feddit.org on 17 Aug 16:01 collapse

I agree, definitely. But here we are, the reality is that people read first paragraphs at best (which there can be valid reasons for) and take away “ah yes, Hawking radiation is a thing black holes do, science says so”. A reader who is interested further and has the mental capacities after working 8 hours 5 days a week to scroll down and read about experimental observations might also realise “oh wait, it isn’t actually clear whether it does exist” but you can’t expect that from everybody (unfortunate as that may be).

This particular instance may be harmless because it probably doesn’t affect anything in everyday life. But in general I think a first paragraph in an encyclopaedic source that wants to inform the general public should be very clear about it when a thing is hypothesised and hasn’t been shown to exist.

timroerstroem@feddit.dk on 17 Aug 14:05 collapse

More or less. In my layman’s understanding: Black holes ‘evaporate’ slowly through Hawking radiation, losing mass as a function of their surface area (simplistically, particle/anti-particle pairs ‘pop out of nothing’ near the event horizon, one gets swallowed up the other escapes, this means a net loss of energy, which has to ‘paid’ by the black hole losing mass, think E=mc^2^).

Since a black hole behaves (geometrically) like any other sphere, the proportion of its area to its volume will grow as the black hole loses mass (i.e. it will have more and more relative area the smaller it gets), this process speeds up over time thus ending in what I guess you could call an explosion (more a whimper than a bang, to borrow a phrase).

Part 2 of your question: We don’t know.

meco03211@lemmy.world on 17 Aug 14:47 collapse

Wouldn’t the hawking radiation need to be a higher rate than the black hole is absorbing matter?

remon@ani.social on 17 Aug 15:01 next collapse

Yes, the effect is extremely tiny and easily offset when a black hole is “feeding”.

rikudou@lemmings.world on 17 Aug 16:44 next collapse

Which will eventually happen to all black holes because the last things remaining will be black holes, so there would be no matter to absorb.

meco03211@lemmy.world on 17 Aug 17:23 collapse

Which begs the question, what happens to the estranged particle that escapes the black hole from hawking radiation.

rikudou@lemmings.world on 17 Aug 18:27 collapse

They’ll wander forever through an ever expanding space, meaning they probably won’t ever come across a different particle.

Eventually everything will reach equilibrium, aka the state where nothing moves anymore because everything it could react with is too far away to cause any reaction.

Ziggurat@jlai.lu on 17 Aug 19:17 collapse

Which is why it would work with a small black hole, but not with a large one

remon@ani.social on 17 Aug 14:00 next collapse

You’re maybe thinking of white dwarfs. Black holes don’t do that.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 18 Aug 08:13 collapse

depends how close you are, and not getting spaghettified.

Zachariah@lemmy.world on 17 Aug 14:10 next collapse

by entering a black hole nested in that black hole

space.com/…/is-our-universe-trapped-inside-a-blac…

palordrolap@fedia.io on 17 Aug 17:12 collapse

Hmm. You might be causally disconnected from the grandparent reality, but you're technically still inside both child and grandchild.

BussyGyatt@feddit.org on 17 Aug 20:29 collapse

isn’t that a direct contradiction? If I’m causally disconnected from a region, in what sense am I “inside” that region? I am causally disconnected from the past, am I in the past? I am causally disconnected from regions of space that are expanding away from me faster than the speed of light, am I “in” those regions in any sense?

palordrolap@fedia.io on 17 Aug 21:02 collapse

They'll each boil off into their parent universes due to Hawking radiation once their respective parent universes reach heat death, so yes, each child is still inside its parent.

But try not to think about orthogonal timelines across causal boundaries or you'll give yourself a headache.

dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world on 17 Aug 15:43 next collapse

You evaporate over billions of years via Hawking radiation.

rikudou@lemmings.world on 17 Aug 16:41 next collapse

Try more like trillions of trillions of trillions… repeat a few more times.

pressanykeynow@lemmy.world on 19 Aug 08:46 collapse

Luckily time flies fast inside.

TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip on 17 Aug 19:51 next collapse

As if being shredded to atoms wasn’t harsh enough, you don’t even get keep your neutrons and electrons in this process. I guess it still counts as “exiting” the black hole, but just barely.

scarabic@lemmy.world on 18 Aug 22:04 collapse

Well your information is preserved in the universe and that’s all any of us can really lay claim to anyway.

ivanafterall@lemmy.world on 18 Aug 23:48 next collapse

What if I have somewhere to be before then?

ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 19 Aug 02:45 collapse

That assumes black holes aren’t the Big Bang white hole events of new pocket universes of the fizzy foam multiverse.

You could be part of a whole new universe! You wouldn’t know it, but how fun!

[deleted] on 17 Aug 16:37 next collapse
.
rikudou@lemmings.world on 17 Aug 16:41 next collapse

That’s actually not that hard, if we’re talking about a rotating black hole that’s sufficiently large (like the supermassive ones are).

JPSound@lemmy.world on 17 Aug 16:50 next collapse

With super massive black holes, you could pass the event horizon and not even know it. To you, everything would remain relatively (no pun intended) comfortable. You could live for a couple days, falling towards the singularity before the gravitational gradient becomes enough to rip you apart, thus ending your life.

[deleted] on 17 Aug 17:09 next collapse
.
[deleted] on 18 Aug 08:17 collapse
.
daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 18 Aug 08:30 collapse

Now I have a doubt. Could you have a stable orbit around the singularity but inside the event horizon? Or is the orbit speed above c?

Maybe you could live a comfy life there.

JPSound@lemmy.world on 18 Aug 11:03 collapse

I would assume that anything that lies within the photon sphere could never have a stable orbit. The photon sphere is the point that light itself orbits the black hole and its 1.5x the radius of the blackhole itself. Anything closer to the singularity than this boundry is doomed to fall into the singularity as it would require faster than light speeds to maintain any stable orbit.

I wonder if anything could actually cross the photon sphere at all without getting vaporized by potentially billions of years of accumulated light that got stuck orbiting the black hole.

mkwt@lemmy.world on 18 Aug 18:23 next collapse

If I recall correctly, the photon sphere orbit is unstable, so there may not be a ton of photons there. “Unstable” in this sense means that photons in adjacent orbits tend to diverge away from the photon sphere orbit rather than toward it.

For Schwarzchild holes, the lowest circular orbit for massive objects is at 3 event horizons, which is above the photon sphere. There are unstable circular orbits down to 2 horizons. Black hole rotation reduces this altitude for prograde orbits asymptotically down to 1 horizon.

Buddahriffic@lemmy.world on 18 Aug 21:35 collapse

Hell, forget the photon sphere, even. Know that jet of energy black holes are thought to sprew out at their poles due to the material falling in to them? Imagine what that material is doing inside the event horizon. Whatever it is, it’ll be pretty violent, enough to call the moon slamming into the earth “relatively peaceful”. It would probably be more pleasant hanging out in the core of the sun than even an AU away from a black hole’s event horizon (and I mean on the outside).

Also, the event horizon is where light cannot escape. The “spacecraft event horizon”, or the orbital plane surrounding a black hole where a spacecraft couldn’t escape it is going to be much farther out, unless we can figure out ftl travel.

CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world on 17 Aug 19:58 collapse

Which technology? Become a bigger AH than the black hole?

[deleted] on 17 Aug 20:00 collapse
.
Asidonhopo@lemmy.world on 17 Aug 16:40 next collapse

Magic

[deleted] on 17 Aug 16:49 next collapse
.
JPSound@lemmy.world on 17 Aug 16:57 next collapse

Literally, impossible. To exit the event horizon of a black hole, you’d have to travel faster than the speed of light. We know for a fact that anything with mass cannot travel at the speed of light. (And anything without mass MUST travel at the speed of light) Once you cross the event horizon, you’ve been entirely and irreversibly separated from the rest of the universe.

chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 18 Aug 01:50 next collapse

Does this also mean that black holes are totally indestructible?

WolfLink@sh.itjust.works on 18 Aug 02:25 next collapse

Basically.

They slowly decay as hawking radiation, but there’s nothing you can do to speed up the process.

JPSound@lemmy.world on 18 Aug 02:41 collapse

Well, there’s the hypothesis of a “naked singularity” whereas if enough charge or spin could be added to a black hole, the event horizon, aka, the black part of a black hole, could just vanish. This would expose the singularity at its center but its just a hypothesis. Or better yet, a thought experiment at best. This wouldn’t eliminate its mass though.

WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works on 18 Aug 03:49 next collapse

It’s not even about needing to exceed the speed of light. Once you cross the event horizon, spacetime around you is so warped that “out” doesn’t exist anymore. Point your ship in any direction and fire up your FTL engine; it doesn’t matter. No matter which way you try and fly your ship, you’ll be getting closer to the center. Once you cross the event horizon, there is literally no way out.

JPSound@lemmy.world on 18 Aug 11:27 collapse

I love how mind bending it is imagining what lies inside a black hole. Everything we know about physics may essentially go right out the window beyond the event horizon.

aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 18 Aug 13:04 collapse

And anything without mass MUST travel at the speed of light

You’re not the boss of me! I do what i want!

allo@sh.itjust.works on 17 Aug 17:42 next collapse

with a stronger blackhole next to your blackhole. just have a stronger pull.

its like how do u have bribed politicians not vote according to that bribe: bribe them with a bigger bribe.

Im28xwa@lemdro.id on 17 Aug 17:45 next collapse

go to the other end

Notyou@sopuli.xyz on 17 Aug 23:52 collapse

Exactly, when you’re going through hell, keep going. Maybe you’ll find a white hole in the other end with a new universe to explore.

thatradomguy@lemmy.world on 17 Aug 18:08 next collapse

feed it taco bell

Tiger666@lemmy.ca on 17 Aug 19:18 next collapse

The singularity will pull you in, feet first, then the tidal effect will spaghettify you. You will be ripped apart atom by atom by those same tidal forces. You cannot escape the event horizon.

Good luck!

CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world on 17 Aug 19:56 collapse

Perhaps op can escape in a form of electromagnetic radiation…

zakobjoa@lemmy.world on 17 Aug 20:15 next collapse

Through the gift shop.

Alexstarfire@lemmy.world on 17 Aug 20:51 collapse
Kolanaki@pawb.social on 17 Aug 20:18 next collapse

Generally speaking, as Hawking Radiation.

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world on 17 Aug 21:14 collapse

what if i want to use my legs afters

adespoton@lemmy.ca on 17 Aug 23:46 collapse

You’d have to build them first.

Anything more complex than an atom is going to be disintegrated before it even enters a black hole due to the intense energies at play at the interface.

Tinidril@midwest.social on 18 Aug 10:29 collapse

Anything as complex as an atom will be disintegrated too.

BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world on 17 Aug 20:30 next collapse

You throw a big party in a place as far as your eyes can see. You call it the event horizon.

BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world on 17 Aug 20:32 next collapse

You just need water and magnets

xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com on 17 Aug 20:40 next collapse

With the assumption that we are alright in there, wait until it evaporates naturally. I hope you brought a lot of books, cause depending on its mass, it can take some time.

667@lemmy.radio on 18 Aug 00:52 next collapse

Only from an outside perspective. Inside the black hole it’s already next Tuesday.

ilinamorato@lemmy.world on 19 Aug 22:52 collapse

Actually, it may be that it quite literally can’t take any time inside a singularity! As you approach a singularity, the spacetime curve representing the passage of time approaches zero, meaning that from your perspective, the universe outside the event horizon moves more and more impossibly fast, and from an outside perspective, you move more and more slowly until your motion appears to stop entirely.

At the singularity, our understanding of spacetime basically just shrugs in an infinite manner, puts on its hat, and clocks out for the day. It may be that, for the singularity, the entirety of time between the collapse of the star that formed the black hole and the eventual evaporation of the black hole due to Hawking radiation are compressed into a single instant, and no time at all passes for it.

So you might not need any books at all, because by the time you reach the singularity (which wouldn’t take a particularly long subjective time), it may well be the end of the universe. Hope you paid the meter.

(Edit to add: Now, probably not. Hawking radiation has to come from somewhere, meaning the particles that have been absorbed had to be converted into them at some point, and that can’t happen if those particles are also still matter (or whatever) in an eternal conga line at the singularity. But hey, our understanding of physics literally can’t be confirmed or denied inside of a black hole, so your fanfic is as good as anyone’s!)

RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip on 19 Aug 23:34 collapse

Enjoyable read!

nikosey@lemmy.world on 17 Aug 22:29 next collapse

don’t fight against gravity by trying to fly directly towards the universe. Instead, fly parallel to the universe until you are out of the black hole’s pull, then angle back towards the universe.

Backhandedsmack@lemmy.world on 18 Aug 05:55 collapse

No no no. You need to take the u-turn at the other end of the universe.

dogs0n@sh.itjust.works on 17 Aug 23:00 next collapse

When you’re ready, you should see a bookshelf. Start messing with the books to send a message to your daughter and maybe she will help you.

Prerequisites: daughter

sbeak@sopuli.xyz on 18 Aug 03:17 collapse

:0

DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works on 18 Aug 01:43 next collapse

Have 5D future humans put you in the tesseract, then you exit seeing your daughter on their deathbed while you barely aged a day.

mechoman444@lemmy.world on 18 Aug 02:13 next collapse

Spaghettified… Mostly.

phoenixz@lemmy.ca on 18 Aug 04:21 next collapse

Space time gets so curved that literally every direction around you is the center of the black hole.

You look forward? Black hole center.

Behind you? Center

Up down? You guessed it

From your perspective, the center literally is the only direction you can go, deeper.

BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz on 18 Aug 11:25 next collapse
renamon_silver@lemmy.wtf on 18 Aug 12:51 next collapse

Vacation is seeming further and further away.

phoenixz@lemmy.ca on 18 Aug 18:33 next collapse

The good news though is that so does work. So does anything, really.

ilinamorato@lemmy.world on 19 Aug 22:36 collapse

Well, the end of it is, at least.

SkyezOpen@lemmy.world on 19 Aug 04:18 collapse

So if you walk backwards, every direction leads out. Easy!

phoenixz@lemmy.ca on 20 Aug 03:00 collapse

So if you walk backwards, every direction leads further in. Easy!

Exactly!

Strider@lemmy.world on 18 Aug 09:01 next collapse

Through a white hole.

(not kidding)

_cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 18 Aug 19:27 next collapse

since black holes are incredibly common in the universe, if everything that went into a black hole came out the “other end” from a white hole, then it would logically follow that white holes would also be incredibly common. however, while white holes might exist, nobody has ever observed one, or found any mechanism capable of creating one, or evidence suggesting that they even exist, or have ever existed, or will ever exist. meanwhile, we have directly imaged the accretion disk around a supermassive black hole.

one definitely exists, the other is firmly within the realm of theoretical only, where it is expected to stay indefinitely.

Olhonestjim@lemmy.world on 19 Aug 03:07 next collapse

Or if every Universe begins with a white hole, you now have a set of keys to the Multiverse.

Pika@rekabu.ru on 19 Aug 16:56 collapse

To be fair, we only recently actually saw a black hole, and before that, it was just assumed to exist by its gravitational effects.

yermaw@sh.itjust.works on 19 Aug 09:45 collapse
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml on 18 Aug 11:28 next collapse

One wouldn’t

PetteriSkaffari@lemmy.world on 18 Aug 19:21 collapse

You can eveporate your way out of it, given enough time.

RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com on 18 Aug 11:54 next collapse

You just pop out the white hole on the other end.

jerkface@lemmy.ca on 18 Aug 12:02 next collapse

The only direction is forward. Better hope it leads somewhere.

wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world on 18 Aug 12:05 next collapse

You go into a white hole, duh

AA5B@lemmy.world on 18 Aug 15:01 next collapse

As a jet of energy, assuming you haven’t actually crossed the event horizon

JcbAzPx@lemmy.world on 18 Aug 19:17 next collapse

You’ll be slowly radiated out one half of an entangled pair of particles at a time. Arranging for reconstruction might prove difficult.

RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world on 19 Aug 01:09 next collapse

Find the Myotrope, invert your orthocameral orbit, grab your ankles, and hold on!

vane@lemmy.world on 19 Aug 01:22 next collapse

With space time snapshot machine I guess, you setup space time snapshot machine to take snapshot and setup detector on your body particles to roll you back from snapshot after your every particle is altered and it rolls you back to previous state. I think this should work.

YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today on 19 Aug 01:44 collapse

And never trust it when it says “quick save” always make a manual backup!

fritobugger2017@lemmy.world on 19 Aug 03:12 next collapse

I don’t know about exiting but I like Entering A Black Hole Backwards followed by Chilly Water.

Fleur_@aussie.zone on 19 Aug 06:56 next collapse

Are you capable of moving faster than the speed of light?

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today on 19 Aug 07:46 next collapse

or have a time dilation device from sg1, that is modified by replicators

CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world on 19 Aug 07:54 next collapse

Pretty sure even that wouldn’t work? Once inside all directions become further in, or all futures become further in, or some bullshit like that.

pressanykeynow@lemmy.world on 19 Aug 08:38 next collapse

But travelling faster than light you can go to the past before you passed the event horizon.

Fleur_@aussie.zone on 19 Aug 12:40 collapse

Doesn’t matter once your breaking constants

renamon_silver@lemmy.wtf on 19 Aug 12:13 collapse

Maybe my farts are

Fleur_@aussie.zone on 19 Aug 12:39 collapse

Real

zaphod@sopuli.xyz on 19 Aug 07:27 next collapse

That’s the fun part, you don’t.

hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 19 Aug 08:43 next collapse

You don’t.

HatchetHaro@pawb.social on 19 Aug 10:36 next collapse

same as you would anybody’s hole: just pull out.

Batman@lemmy.world on 20 Aug 05:57 collapse

you just walk out. might need to build a bridge first