Is it me or is everyone in hexbear insane?
from EABOD25@lemm.ee to nostupidquestions@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 12:13
https://lemm.ee/post/41580412

I think a little clarification is needed. No. I don’t actually think everyone there is insane. I don’t care about the bans so stop trying to use that. HB enthusiasts coming here and trying to call me out achieves nothing besides proving my point

Edit: Feel free to keep trying to brigade me. It’s not going to scare me to take this down

#nostupidquestions

threaded - newest

slazer2au@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 12:19 next collapse

Yes, Everyone. the bots, the human user, me, and even you. You can’t escape it.

lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network on 06 Sep 12:24 next collapse

You and @EABOD25@lemm.ee aren’t on hexbear, though, are you?

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 12:35 collapse

I normally search search by “all” when scrolling and I’ll see one or two posts from there. I haven’t really figured out all the technicals, but I see posts from all instances

Stovetop@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 13:02 next collapse

It might vary from app to app, but there are usually options to toggle between Local and Everywhere for “All” content, if you want to see just what is on your own instance versus all other instances yours is federated with.

lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network on 06 Sep 15:03 collapse

Sure, but I meant you asked if everyone in hexbear is insane, and they included you and themselves in the hexbear server, I think?

Anyway, you can block users/communities/servers, still. Maybe that can improve your experience?

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 15:15 collapse

My experience is already great. There’s nothing anyone can say to me to ruin my day

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 12:37 collapse

Yeah but my insane is cheeky and fun. Their insane is cruel and tragic

PlasticExistence@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 13:10 collapse

I’m going to pistol whip the next person who says shenanigans

snooggums@midwest.social on 06 Sep 17:15 collapse

Hey EABOD25, what’s the name of that restaurant you like with all the goofy shit on the walls and the mozzarella sticks?

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 09 Sep 12:34 collapse

Insane!? You’re talking about Insane right?

snooggums@midwest.social on 09 Sep 13:23 collapse

No, no. The one with the wild and wacky activities!

Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works on 06 Sep 12:27 next collapse

If you’ve heard of Chapo Trap House that’s them. If not, most of those kids/idiots/trolls are the type of terminally online fake leftists that give other leftist a bad image in general. They were so ridiculous Reddit got tired of their shit and banned them a couple years back.

fern@lemmy.autism.place on 06 Sep 12:44 next collapse

They were banned when reddit cracked down on any leftist thought, not because they were especially bad from what I saw.

Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works on 06 Sep 12:55 collapse

They were banned around the same time as The Donald because everyone was tired of the shit both groups were doing.

fern@lemmy.autism.place on 06 Sep 12:57 next collapse

I do remember that, and I remember them half-assing the Donald by just letting them make a new sub (or overrun conspiracy irrc)

Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works on 06 Sep 13:00 collapse

Yeah they immediately took over Conspiracy and consolidated the hold on Conservative. Made me really sad as conspiracy used to have some incredible rabbit hole posts. Then one day it was just TD all over again.

grue@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 15:46 collapse

IIRC, the fun conspiracists moved to r/high_strangeness or something like that.

USSMojave@startrek.website on 06 Sep 21:15 next collapse

Do you know if there’s a Lemmy version?

imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one on 07 Sep 02:04 collapse

That sub is trash also. I think the whole conspiracy theorist subculture has been taken over by the alt right and is highly politicized at this point.

grue@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 03:26 next collapse

I was afraid of that (which is why I phrased it less definitively than I could have). Good to know!

cass80@programming.dev on 07 Sep 04:28 collapse

The days of mild and fun conspiracy theories are over. The entire community has been fully consumed with qanon/maga/antisemitism insanity. Their minds are irrevocably broken.

It’s a shame. I grew up on xfiles and loved all the lore around the culture.

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 06 Sep 13:00 next collapse

The Donald had largely abandoned the sub well before it was banned though.

Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works on 06 Sep 13:12 collapse

Largely because they moved to different subs.

The Chapo crew didn’t want to calm down with all the threats of violence and other ridiculous antics. So they left completely.

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 06 Sep 14:06 collapse

Threats of violence against confederate slave owners.

Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works on 06 Sep 14:17 next collapse

TIL Reddit admins were confederate slavers

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 06 Sep 15:06 next collapse

When the sub was put on probation, the post Reddit cited was justifying violence against slave owners. As far as I can tell, you just made up that they threatened Reddit admins.

Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works on 06 Sep 16:00 collapse

There were other things that went down to get them on probation. I can tell you’re gladly defending them though. Which is ridiculous so have a nice day.

Diva@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 09:46 collapse

Do you have some inside information you want to share with the rest of the class?

BakerBagel@midwest.social on 06 Sep 15:19 collapse

Huffman has been a frequent attendee at Burning Man, the annual, clothing-optional festival in the Nevada desert, where artists mingle with moguls. He fell in love with one of its core principles, “radical self-reliance,” which he takes to mean “happy to help others, but not wanting to require others.” (Among survivalists, or “preppers,” as some call themselves, FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, stands for “Foolishly Expecting Meaningful Aid.”) Huffman has calculated that, in the event of a disaster, he would seek out some form of community: “Being around other people is a good thing. I also have this somewhat egotistical view that I’m a pretty good leader. I will probably be in charge, or at least not a slave, when push comes to shove.”

Spez pretty openly fantasizes about owwning slaves

abraham_linksys@sh.itjust.works on 06 Sep 18:47 collapse

Not saying you’re wrong but a citation with that quote would go a long way

BakerBagel@midwest.social on 06 Sep 19:35 collapse
Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 20:11 collapse

Speaking of, John Brown was right.

BakerBagel@midwest.social on 06 Sep 15:15 next collapse

The_Donald was dead amd had migrated to a non-reddit forum a month before the ban. It was typical “both sides” bullshit from a dude who always uses the kiddy gloves with fascists while throwing the book at any leftists

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 03:45 next collapse

They were banned while saying John Brown did nothing wrong and that slaveowners deserve to die.

Sounds pretty cool to me.

Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works on 07 Sep 04:41 collapse

While true there was a lot more behind the decision than that final post. They had been fighting with the admins for a long time.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 05:08 next collapse

evidence? I see people say this but from what I remember the mod team was repeatedly stonewalled by the admins, or at least that was their claims, and I don’t think the admins ever disputed that

Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works on 07 Sep 14:42 collapse

Hardly, the mods kept refusing to do anything about the brigading of other subs. To the point the admins stepped in and removed a couple of them. Then afterward the sub decided they’d rather go private than comply. At this point most of back and forth is wiped out because the sub is locked. But there was far more going on for a while than their claim that one post shut them down immediately. They had already been in trouble for a couple months.

reddit.com/…/chapotraphouse_gets_a_call_from_the_…

www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%…

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 15:35 collapse

I wasn’t clear enough, what I meant wasn’t that the admins literally never said anything to the mods, I meant they made it relatively unclear what exactly they needed to do to stop getting warnings and eventually getting banned. no conversation, just relatively vague commands from down high also, as you can see in the SRD thread it was never made clear if they were removed for anything besides the john brown posting. However, even this is more clear communication than I remembered so I’ll admit fault on that at least.

funny thing I found browsing the thread is this comment about why chapo got banned, which mentions brigading, something people constantly accused/accuse hexbear users of doing:

The second aspect of this is that chapo is becoming so large that it is capable of effectively “brigading” threads without any direct co-ordination on the subreddit. By this I’m referring to stuff like the police dog situation, in which any meaningfully upvoted thread on /r/aww and other “cute” subreddits gets a shitload of “40%”, “ACAB”, and other anti-cop rhetoric. While screenshots of this often get posted to /r/chapotraphouse, the vast majority of the time this is AFTER the thread has already been “brigaded” by chapo users scrolling through /r/all or the specific “cute” subreddits. This behavior is not against the TOS, but it is incredibly annoying to /r/aww mods and therefore concerning to the admins, because the “cute” subreddits are the easiest to manage and please, and more importantly, the most advertiser friendly. When chapo users fuck that up, there’s a problem.

sounds familiar doesn’t it?

Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works on 07 Sep 17:46 collapse

Yes. They moved here. Have done the same things. Pissed many people off. Thankfully this time they can be easily contained due to how Lemmy works. They could just grow up and not be an embarrassment to the left. But that’s apparently too big an ask.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 17:49 collapse

this is very strange reasoning to me, posting on a post you see scrolling through all is now bad because… other hexbears already got there first and you dont want to be annoying? what the hell?

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 21:53 collapse

my lemmy shows a baby emoji, come out hexbear alt, and turn on bbc news.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 21:57 collapse

easily the most baffling comment I’ve received today what are you trying to say???

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 21:58 collapse

mm, yes under 1 day, now go on turn on your tv and watch bbc news instead if being terminally online.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 22:06 collapse

you… opened my profile… and didn’t read my bio? “so it’s clear: I primarily use lemmygrad, I am not trying to hide this”. so I’m a grad “alt” whatever that even means, what is this weird obsession about people having accounts on different instances

additionally, I’ve made multiple comments in this very thread about it:

I think my comments have been too ambiguous then, I didn’t mean for anything I’ve said to come across as hostile in any way, I apologize. I’m a lemmygrad user, made this account because I browse through .ml at work and been meaning to make one so i can comment while there.

I’m a grad user not a hexbear user but views are pretty much the same, I’ll say here: it matters a ton in the thread and way in which you tried to do this. if you give the slightest hint that you’re asking questions in bad faith, they’re going to pounce on you, because communists online constantly have to deal with bad faith trolls. There are an extremely small number of communists in the west, we are outnumbered basically everywhere online and in real life, so we are naturally protective of the very few places where we hold the majority opinion.

I’m not gonna go looking for your interactions with hexbear to actually see but I’ll answer any questions you have right now. also, you haven’t been banned or had any action taken against you by hexbear mods at all. you could always pose respectful questions in one of their general mega threads, or in ask chapo

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 06:35 collapse

There actually isn’t any such logic presented for the decision. Mostly just allusions to celebrating violence, the only examples of which were the anti-slavery posts I referenced.

Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works on 07 Sep 14:58 collapse

Maybe because you didn’t observe it happening. Reddit admins were busy as hell cleaning the place up. All kinds of rightwing subs like some of the incel gathering spots. Some for straight up Nazis like frenworld or whatever it was where they were using honk honk as code for heil Hitler. When the admins made site changes due to complaints about right wing subs, Chapo made the list because they engaged in similar activities with the main complaint being brigading other subs. Their mods refused to change to meet the new rules. The admins eventually removed some of the mods. They still refused to change afterward. Which eventually got them shut down.

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 16:28 collapse

Maybe because you didn’t observe it happening.

I did, actually. I made some of the John Brown posts lol.

Reddit admins were busy as hell cleaning the place up. All kinds of rightwing subs like some of the incel gathering spots. Some for straight up Nazis like frenworld or whatever it was where they were using honk honk as code for heil Hitler. When the admins made site changes due to complaints about right wing subs, Chapo made the list because they engaged in similar activities with the main complaint being brigading other subs.

Brigading is not an activity similar to supporting incels or Nazis.

I remember the subreddit mods sharing their attempts to communicate with admins on this, offering to make whatever changes would be needed, and getting stonewalled. The subreddit itself adopted a no-brigading policy and included it with an pinned automod comment on every post.

But this is neither here nor there because the ban announcement said nothing about brigading. Instead, they said it was about content violating their new anti-hate policy and a vague statement about mods not “reining” in users. Prior communications and the timeline suggested the only content violations were anti-slavery posts.

Their mods refused to change to meet the new rules.

How so?

The admins eventually removed some of the mods.

Which ones and why?

They still refused to change afterward

Such as?

The reality is that most of this was actually opaque.

Saint_La_Croix_Crosse@midwest.social on 07 Sep 11:58 collapse

No, The Donald was encouraging political violence and was becoming a legal liability for Reddit to continue hosting. But they needed to ban a major left wing subreddit at the same time to do a “both sides bad” thing and preempt the fascist talking points about social media having a liberal bias.

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 12:46 collapse

Seeing the ban coming, they financed and suffered alpha and beta of the Lemmy platform we all enjoy. Then, they chose to become the most GLBTQ+ friendly destination on the internet.

As it’s always been, they cope with the horrible events with satirical, sarcastic humor. And, in the middle of that will be a well-reasoned, nuanced, and quite serious post.

But, perhaps the part I like most is the struggle sessions. The entire community will heavily focus on a current topic, then hash it out with good faith discussion.

Their shit isn’t convenient or comfortable. It’s not easy to understand. And, I fucking love them for it.

edit: Lazy coders need choose a randomized target value and timing or be a moderator to avoid detection by the user. Perceiving is easy when your code is trash. Ask for help from an industrial engineer.

mathemachristian@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 12:50 next collapse

Yeah they kept being able to back the most ridiculous claims and then suddenly I was like “oh no they were right all along” and got radicalized 🤷

Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works on 06 Sep 13:29 collapse

Coming up with theory in an echo chamber isn’t hard.

mathemachristian@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 13:30 collapse

and how they kept being able to back it up?

Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works on 06 Sep 13:35 next collapse

That’s the whole point of an echo chamber yes. You can say whatever you want without being challenged by other viewpoints and make anything seem plausible.

mathemachristian@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 13:37 collapse

but they are linking a lot of outside sources. That’s what I mean by “backing their claims up”, studies about covid, about the ukraine war, about Israel, it’s not just someone making a claim and then everyone is nodding along.

What I am saying is they were able to completely upend the way I see the world and you just can’t do that by claiming thengs and linking to some other claims you make.

Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works on 06 Sep 13:42 next collapse

What you’re not accounting for is how they curate who is allowed to post in the first place.

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 06 Sep 15:03 next collapse

Hexbear is not able to curate who is allowed to post in other instances

OpenStars@discuss.online on 06 Sep 17:55 collapse

If you’ve heard of Chapo Trap House that’s them.

You seem to have lost the thread of this conversation, but this is how it started. Hexbear admins and mods definitely control who is allowed to post in Chapo Trap House, and related communities such as the_dunk_tank, even from instances other than Hexbear.net.

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 06 Sep 17:57 next collapse

Mathemachristian is on lemm.ee, Hexbear cannot control most of the communities he sees.

Saint_La_Croix_Crosse@midwest.social on 07 Sep 11:55 collapse

Wait, like the drug dealer? but seriously, “they have moderation, so you don’t have to read or engage with facts, since they have a viewpoint” isn’t the dunk you think it is.

mathemachristian@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 15:50 collapse

I was on lemm.ee when I got radicalized, all my life Ive been exposed to people claiming all sorts of things. I was a pro-NATO pro-Ukraine anti-ussr anti-china average reddit lib that they were able to convince otherwise.

AmidFuror@fedia.io on 06 Sep 14:09 collapse

Wait until you hear about Scientology! Not the criticism from haters but the really mindbending stuff they have figured out.

Kaboom@reddthat.com on 06 Sep 14:02 collapse

It’s surprisingly easy to backup horrible ideas, but that shouldn’t be your only concern. You also need to think about the morals and what happened last time it was tried.

The ends do not justify the means. The means are the ends.

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 03:44 collapse

The last time what was tried? This sounds like historical “knowledge” derived from memes.

GBU_28@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 13:11 next collapse

Their supposed support of LGBTQ+ is all for naught when they openly fawn after Stalin

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 13:22 next collapse

There’s much to learn from Stalin. But, advocating his authoritarian means is a bannable offense there just as they are in any meritable leftist forum. They tolerate a minority of revolutionaries ideologically leading the lumpen as it’s a historically very well-supoorted position. But, that doesn’t extend to physical force as that’s also a historically very well supported position.

It’s much easier, convenient, and comfortable to demonized them than understand them. They even provided proactive assistance when many were deciding if they should defederate. They voted internally for defederation to defend their community from the medicrity of the masses.

GBU_28@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 13:27 collapse

If not enjoying the image posts of young Stalin as some sort of brilliant maverick is mediocrity, well, so be it. They are clowns, and their beliefs structure is just like trump claiming he “loves the gays”

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 13:48 collapse

Young Stalin is where the good stuff is. It’s his implementation of those idealistic principles that’s unethical.

The rest of what you’ve said is strawman. Most important is the implying that they’re all of one mind. Diversity of ideology is perhaps their greatest strength.

GBU_28@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 13:55 collapse

🥱

Literally out here defending Stalin stans

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 14:02 collapse

Ad hominem is literally the best you had when confronted with facts that didn’t fit the shallow narrative you chose.

GBU_28@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 14:17 collapse

The “facts” are things we both agreed are posted there. That’s all I need. If they’re a stalin apologist / stan then the shows over.

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 14:22 collapse

Probably also wrote off the Bible due to the implementation of the followers. That’s too bad.

GBU_28@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 14:28 collapse

The medieval rewrite of an Abrahamic faith mythology? More junk.

flashgnash@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 21:23 collapse

Honestly what is with the comrade/them shit they do about? I thought it was ironic like they were making fun of neopronouns or they were the 4chan people who popularised them in the first place

14th_cylon@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 14:05 next collapse

As it’s always been, they cope with the horrible events with satirical, sarcastic humor. And, in the middle of that will be a well-reasoned, nuanced, and quite serious post.

Oh yes, they are so funny, misunderstood, thoughtful and nuanced thinkers.

F them and f you for defending them.

<img alt="" src="https://lemm.ee/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FnaqzXc7.png">

This ~1800 comment thread about whether lemm.ee should defederate with them is all you need for some eye opening, in case anyone needs that.

lemm.ee/post/4543536

Above screenshot is from said thread.

The comrade in it actually suggests that there is a time and place for such rhetoric, it is just not right here, right now. you have to think politically and wait for your moment!

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 14:10 next collapse

Yes, please read what the .ee admin says about where the bigoted users originate and the actions of the hexbear mods in response. It certainly speaks for itself.

Saint_La_Croix_Crosse@midwest.social on 07 Sep 11:52 next collapse

though, to be fair, kulaks are bad.

14th_cylon@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 12:26 collapse

fuck off

SSJMarx@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 18:31 collapse

The comrade in it actually suggests that there is a time and place for such rhetoric

Perhaps now is the time.

The kulaks were not an ethnic minority persecuted by the bolsheviks as a scapegoat for society’s ills. They were the economic class directly responsible for many of those ills. They were the capitalists of the peasantry, enclosing land and claiming ownership over what should have been the common means of production, precisely the kind of group that communists the world over want to destroy in order to liberate the majority of people.

When it was written that the kulaks were to be “liquidated”, it did not mean that they were to be mass executed, it meant that their private property was to be moved into public ownership, ending the existence of the kulak class and making them into regular workers.

As is the case in every single campaign of economic or social justice, the privileged class fought back with everything they had. Kulaks contributed to the Soviet Famine of 1930-1933 by mass slaughtering their cattle and burning their fields. Kulaks hoarded grain, took the wealth that they had stolen from their neighbors and fled the country, plotted sabotage and insurrection against the workers’ movement. And for those crimes, many Kulaks were caught and executed.

So if the original commenter’s great grandparents were kulaks who “suffered at the hands of the soviet union,” they deserved it.

michaelmrose@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 06:10 next collapse

Your portrayal of them just being made into regular peasants seems to me viewing the whole affair with more than rose colored glasses.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dekulakization

All kulaks were assigned to one of three categories:[4]
Those to be shot or imprisoned as decided by the local secret political police. Those to be sent to Siberia, the North, the Urals, or Kazakhstan, after confiscation of their property. Those to be evicted from their houses and used in labour colonies within their own districts.

By most people’s reckoning in most of planet earth they stole the lawfully earned property of kulaks and either murdered them or otherwise destroyed their lives. Treating them worse than most developed nations treat burglars and thieves.

If someone shot your grandpa and your uncle, send half your people to Siberia to die out there, and sent the other half to prison locally of course you would flee with whatever you could carry and of course you would at that point be an enemy of the regime that destroyed your life.

So if the original commenter’s great grandparents were kulaks who “suffered at the hands of the soviet union,” they deserved it.

I don’t understand your justification for what is ultimately pretty horrific treatment foisted on people ultimately just participating lawfully in society up until that point.

SSJMarx@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 07:39 collapse

All kulaks were assigned to one of three categories:[4]

Source four on this wikipedia article is Robert Conquest, an antihistorical Cold Warrior if there ever was one - and most of the rest of that article doesn’t even do the courtesy of citing a hack. It’s just section after section of “this section has no sources”, who wrote this garbage?

If someone shot your grandpa and your uncle

Some brave Vietnamese soldier did exactly that, and my uncle frankly deserved it for signing up to go murder people on the other side of the world in the name of American Imperialism.

I don’t understand your justification for what is ultimately pretty horrific treatment foisted on people ultimately just participating lawfully in society up until that point.

Slaveowners were “just participating lawfully in society” too. Society sanctions a lot of incredibly damaging and amoral behavior, and when the repressed take power there is no reason why they should be expected to give their oppressors a pass just because it was legal at the time.

michaelmrose@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 08:17 collapse

America didn’t go from legally sanctioning a behavior to murdering the people today who were behaving lawfully yesterday even if they were immoral fucks. If you don’t understand that then you don’t understand how normal societies run.

SSJMarx@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 18:39 collapse

Tell me, how did Reconstruction go? Were the former slaves elevated to the status of citizens equal to their former masters?

No. The great post-Civil War failure of America was its failure to defend the gains made by the freed slave population, allowing the previous ruling class to swoop back in and reassert their power in a nearly-identical form to how it had been before. Sharecropping instead of slavery. This failure demonstrates quite succinctly why any social or economic justice movement cannot simply win the war - it must also continue to defend itself after the war, and that defense will by necessity take the form of repressing those members of the former ruling class who cannot accept the new status quo.

14th_cylon@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 11:40 next collapse

Perhaps now is the time.

No, Time for condoning class war and murder is never and nowhere.

Go back to hexbear, you poor, uneducated, lying, bolshevik piece of shit.

But thank you for showing anyone who may have not had an experience with you before what type of people you are.

One can always count on that, you morons just can’t help yourself.

SSJMarx@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 18:33 collapse

If you don’t condone class war, then you are by necessity endorsing the current system. The current system which kills far, far more innocent people than any class war ever could, you lying, capitalist piece of shit.

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 14:48 collapse

🤭

You guys don’t even hide it anymore. You’re openly advocating for brutal police regimes. The jokes write themselves. Convenient.

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 16:18 next collapse

You don’t get to call directing state power against the petite bourgeoisie a brutal police regime when your government is supporting the most brutal dictatorships in Africa, whose violence is directed at the working class.

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 16:31 collapse

Yeah I get to do that, because that’s what happened factually, sorry. No amount of whataboutism will change that. I don’t care about Western imperialists, fuck them too.

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 16:45 collapse

The vital context is wielding state power against internal threats. Which literally every state must do to continue to exist. It’s not whataboutism to point out that the state you currently live in is currently doing far worse, for far worse reasons in a context where your criticism can only be used for anticommunism.

Would you say it’s constructive for an Israeli to be critical of gay rights in Palestine? Of course not, because divorced of context, it only carries water for imperialism

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 16:58 collapse

The problem is the violence of the totalitarian regimes you defend harms innocents too, which is why serious communists shouldn’t advocate for that kind of power abuse any more than they should advocate for Western imperialism. It’s not that hard.

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 17:45 collapse

Nobody is advocating power abuse. One of the books I try to get people to read, Life and Terror in Stalin’s Russia contextualizes the scale of and how such abuses occurred in a much more useful criticism than “communism bad Stalin evil, that’s why you can’t ever do anything about rightists organizing against the state”.

A good accompaniment to illustrate what it looks like and what the consequences are when the left fails to take appropriate action once in power is The Jakarta Method

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 18:31 collapse

That’s precisely the extent of my criticism. Understanding stalinism instead of just demonizing it is a good thing, if only to avoid repeating the same mistakes. But the end doesn’t justify the means. Apologism is not OK.

It’s OK to take a stance against power abuses, and vital to denounce them if you consider yourself a leftist.

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 18:54 collapse

the end doesn’t justify the means

Suppression of the right was necessary, however the relative freedom given to locals to carry it out resulted in people using it to settle old scores or non-ideological people to advance politically within the party. While dekulization enabled them, those actions were orthogonal (and actually hindered) the aims of dekulization.

Whether that can be considered justification or apologia isn’t constructive IMO. Personally though, I just consider it an error in the way it was carried out.

Similar issues (and resulting sentiments) are observed in the wake of Mao giving villages the freedom to set up their own courts and try landlords and others.

It’s […] vital to denounce them if you consider yourself a leftist.

We had that struggle back when Kruschev sent the tanks into Hungary and every western leftist org was falling over each other to denounce the USSR. Meanwhile nazis were being put in charge of police forces in South America to do crimes against humanity against indigenous and communist elements and hundreds of thousands were being massacred in South Korea.

Turns out the tankies were right. Denouncing the enemies of the state you live in just serves to carry water for imperialism.

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 21:45 collapse

By using the kind of the repression they used on the public, they proved they were no better than the capitalists they despise so much.

Someone that actually cares about left-wing politics cares a lot more about the outcomes than which faction comes ahead. Politics aren’t a game of Risk. Actions have consequences, and humanity as a whole loses when innocents get killed by brainwashed idiots.

If stalinist Russia is what utopia is supposed to be, I’m not interested, thank you.

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 22:05 collapse

Someone that actually cares about left-wing politics cares a lot more about the outcomes

Yes, that’s why I recommended The Jakarta Method, it details exactly what the outcome looks like when the left doesn’t repress the right and instead lets the sabotage and organize. It’s really an important book because you can see echos of the methods in South Korea under the dictatorship, Taiwan during the white terror, Pinochet’s Chile, Uruguay even before the '73 coup, etc.

they proved they were no better than the capitalists they despise so much.

If you believe this, you do not know the scale and details of capitalist repression.

utopia

Literally no Marxist would call any AES project Utopian, except as a pejorative.

Here’s a pamphlet differentiating Utopian and Scientific Socialism It’s not an easy read due to being from 1880.

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 23:37 collapse

I know what the outcomes look like when the “left” represses the right and everybody else, including themselves. And your failure to see how undesirable those outcomes may be to leftists around the world is precisely the beef we have against Lemmygrad, Nazbear and tankies in general. You do not represent us, and we’ll never be allies. Even worse, you guys actively sabotage leftism by keeping red-scare era scarecrows alive. I’m glad you’re such an insignificant minority that we can contain, to be quite frank. The tankie problem used to be way worse on Lemmy less than a year ago.

I know my local revolutionnary/communist party, despite being leninist, is fiercely anti-Stalin, for instance. The fixation on defending totalitarianism is frankly bizarre.

Diva@lemmy.ml on 09 Sep 11:09 collapse

I know my local revolutionnary/communist party, despite being leninist, is fiercely anti-Stalin, for instance. The fixation on defending totalitarianism is frankly bizarre.

You sound like you’re talking about trotskyists, who have been the main ones keeping the old communist scarecrows alive on the left

I remember going to one of my local groups anti-fascism reading years back and it was mostly a bunch of white people rambling about how evil Stalin was.

By comparison the student maoists I’ve known have way more nuanced opinions on Stalin and actually do community and propaganda work rather than selling newspapers

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 09 Sep 12:55 collapse

Well, you’re right they do sell newspapers. Their first issue was about rehabilitating Lenin, so I wouldn’t be so quick to dismiss them as Trotskyists.

Diva@lemmy.ml on 09 Sep 15:36 collapse

That’s literally what every trot org does, they sing Lenins praises, while continuing to bicker about factional infighting from close to a hundred years ago.

I have family members who were (forcibly) internally resettled in the USSR who hold less of a grudge against Stalin than some American trots I’ve encountered.

SSJMarx@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 18:32 collapse

Equality has never in the history of our species been given freely by the ruling class to the workers. It has always been taken after violent struggle, and after the initial struggle is over the working class must be willing to defend their gains else they will lose them.

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 18:48 collapse

I acknowledge that. But what “struggle” means is not an unimportant detail. And I disagree with the Stalinist approach viscerally, and it isn’t in accordance with leftist values by any stretch of the imagination.

would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml on 06 Sep 16:10 next collapse

But, perhaps the part I like most is the struggle sessions. The entire community will heavily focus on a current topic, then hash it out with good faith discussion.

I’ve never seen this - not just from that instance, but literally anywhere on the internet, even back in the forum or bb days. But I’ve been looking for something like that for years, and I’d be interested. Do you know of any specific examples of this happening?

LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 17:25 next collapse

I also haven’t seen this but it seems to make fun of the authoritarian excesses in Mao’s China (struggle session).

The Three Body Problem show features this, leading a character to go mad and wanting to destroy humanity.

The funny thing is that this post is sort of a struggle session, an attempt to build consensus against socialists.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 05:06 collapse

it’s not really making fun of it, more just a tongue in cheek joke about large arguments

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 19:25 next collapse

The best example I’ve experienced online is hexbear’s process to derive forum ruleset with respect to their minority of GLBTQ+. The consensus was that many understood and that those that did not would follow in faith, assuming that they would soon understand. The second best online example was the GME subreddits’ cultural response to initial scaling. The consensus was that each should individually choose and the collective’s purpose was to educate, this strengthening individual wisdom.

But, my guidance would be to first pursue such things in real life. A leftist’s best work is almost always grassroots local.

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 22:33 collapse

Notable struggle sessions:

Pronouns End result: Transphobes outed themselves and were purged)

Veganism End result: Vegans who couldn’t stop stoking the fire and anti-vegans who wouldn’t stop trolling or using indigenous people as a shield were purged, CWs were required for meat, vegans generally chilled out

Stacking rocks End result: White guys using indigenous tribes they aren’t a part of as a shield were heavily mocked)

Outdoor Cats End result: outdoor cats bad

AES countries End result: For each country, there are/have been significant issues, but nearly every western criticism is worthless for understanding them due to being false or lacking the historical context.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 05:05 next collapse

i don’t think they really helped with the financing of lemmy, although their coders did/do make many valuable contributions to lemmy’s code base. out of curiosity, do you have an account on another instance? I’m surprised to see a sympathetic comment like this from an account on an instance that has them defederated

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 10:29 collapse

I don’t think they really helped with the financing

All the computational resources the users tested the code base on must’ve been free.

I’m surprised to see a sympathetic comment like this from an account on an instance that has them defederated

Identity politics from .ml?

If you’re surprised at such small acts of individual praxis, you’d be amazed at what we’ve accomplished in groups.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 11:13 collapse

All the computational resources the users tested the code base on must’ve been free.

fair enough I just think of direct monetary donations or something when I see financing like that but looking at like that isn’t incorrect

Identity politics from .ml?

I mean kinda? I normally expect people who hold sympathies towards hexbear to use an account on like lemm.ee so they don’t have to use more than one account to browse everything they want to see

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 12:11 collapse

when I see financing like that but looking at like that isn’t incorrect

None of the devs got paid. There are no other expenses.

I normally expect people who hold sympathies towards hexbear to use an account on like lemm.ee so they don’t have to use more than one account to browse everything they want to see

You expect the convenient implementation of MLK’s white moderate. But, my content should give no indication of that stereotype.

I’ll answer your previous question: I’ve personal accounts on world, ee, ml, and hexbear. The fediverse doesn’t limit viewing content from multiple accounts concurrently. One must only choose an account to post. The only obstacle to such a tool is a means to avoid burdening the fediverse with duplicate responses to content requests. We solved that problem in a few hours.

If you want actual insight communicated properly then you should ask in the correct venue. For example, I’d have no issue explaining in nuance on hexbear because the majority has a strong understanding or conversion of theory to praxis. I’m not even needed. Others would adequately explain on my behalf.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 12:38 collapse

I think my comments have been too ambiguous then, I didn’t mean for anything I’ve said to come across as hostile in any way, I apologize. I’m a lemmygrad user, made this account because I browse through .ml at work and been meaning to make one so i can comment while there.

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 16:25 collapse

I’ve perceived only good faith from your posts. I apologize if I’ve not demonstrated that in my responses. It’s difficult to do here.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 16:27 collapse

all good no worries, tone can be very hard to show through text 😅

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 13:56 collapse

Based on this interaction I’ve realized my perception of lemmygrad is hypocritical: My experience indicates that our shallow, automated and wide scope language analysis likely isn’t human truth. I’ve decided to spend more time there.

Thank you for risking good faith engagement when it’s not popular or politic. Iron sharpens iron.

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 14:45 collapse

As it’s always been, they cope with the horrible events with satirical, sarcastic humor. And, in the middle of that will be a well-reasoned, nuanced, and quite serious post.

It’s just tankie 4chan

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 14:51 collapse

Hello, low effort neolib troll. Thanks for the opportunity to continue to speak truth.

There’s a cultural similarity to what 4-chan was prior to the LOIC. But, they’re definitely not tankies. Sincere expressions of authoritarian means are soundly defeated and usually result in permabans. The principle and practice is consistent for MAGA, neolibs, and other authoritarians.

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 15:00 collapse

Definitely not a neolib, but I’m glad we agree about the similarities of Nazbear with 4chan

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 15:19 collapse

Definitely not a neolib

Language analysis of your post history says differently. If you’re not a neolib troll then perhaps you should stop presenting as such.

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 15:42 collapse

I call BS. My post history has mostly been shitting on LLMs lately, mainly for the consequences they have on the environment, which I think is mostly a left-wing concern.

Making shit up, how nice 🤭

Edit you haven’t read much, I suppose because My 5th-ish last post was arguing against the liberal appeal to civility, which is definitely not a “neolib” talking point 🤷‍♀️

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 15:50 collapse

Did I fault your content or your presentation of it?

Nice strawman. You just can’t help yourself.

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 15:52 collapse

Are you arguing for civility, liberal? Do you wish to police my tone? 🤭

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 15:55 collapse

Predictable responses, now assigning me intent. I’ll no longer disturb your comfortable order. Best of luck, neolib.

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 15:56 collapse

The irony 🤣

Nemo@slrpnk.net on 06 Sep 12:31 next collapse

is everyone in hexbear insane?

Yes.

Badeendje@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 13:06 next collapse

All animals are equal… But some more equal than others.

Nomecks@lemmy.ca on 06 Sep 13:07 collapse

8 billion stupid monkeys

JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 14:53 collapse

Seconded

Source: am stupid monke

Kaboom@reddthat.com on 06 Sep 12:33 next collapse

Pretty much, yeah, they’re insane. They’re also a very good reminder to go outside and talk to people outside your echo chamber regularly

[deleted] on 06 Sep 12:38 collapse
.
Kaboom@reddthat.com on 06 Sep 13:10 collapse

I’m talking more about hexbear in particular. That’s an echo chamber

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 13:19 collapse

Oh. My bad

Blizzard@lemmy.zip on 06 Sep 12:33 next collapse

You are correct. Do your mental health a favour and block that instance along with lemmygrad.

14th_cylon@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 12:47 collapse

Problem is that blocking the instance doesn’t block these clowns’ comments on other instances, you have to do a lot of manual blocking.

Stovetop@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 13:00 next collapse

Some instances are defederated from them, which would prevent them from being seen elsewhere.

OpenStars@discuss.online on 06 Sep 13:24 collapse

That would work for some - hexbear.net and lemmygrad.ml - but not for others, like lemmy.ml and maybe Midwest.social. At some point users need to start blocking on their own.

Fermion@feddit.nl on 06 Sep 15:15 next collapse

That depends on your client. Connect for lemmy shows a placeholder for comments from blocked instances. You can click to show the comment anyway or just blissfully ignore the high probability rage bait.

I actually like that implementation, because the obnoxiousness of hexbear users is context dependent. On posts about gardening and nolawns I’ll usually see what they have to say. On political posts, I usually regret reading their comments. So it’s somewhat nice to opt-in to comments on a case by case basis.

SorteKanin@feddit.dk on 07 Sep 05:59 collapse

Lemm.ee basically doesn’t defederate anything. You should probably go to an instance that defederates those instances.

14th_cylon@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 12:38 collapse

While I would prefer defederation in this case, I found being on an instance ran by competent admin small price to pay.

fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc on 06 Sep 12:38 next collapse

Not all of them, some are just idiots.

Luci@lemmy.ca on 06 Sep 12:40 next collapse

Just you.

algorithmae@lemmy.sdf.org on 06 Sep 12:45 next collapse

It’s not just you

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.sdf.org/pictrs/image/fff01222-8f3a-47db-baa7-adf3dd7c0fe8.png">

FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 06 Sep 14:24 next collapse

And increasingly lemmy.ml, sadly

SARGE@startrek.website on 06 Sep 16:58 collapse

They’re getting there, but so far it’s only a few users that I’ve noticed.

One guy seems to be following me around to attempt mockery.

They’re very much getting to “everyone who isn’t farther left than me is a right-wing nazi” mentality.

FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 06 Sep 17:29 next collapse

They aren’t even really left. They are super authoritarian.

I blocked them since they spew Russian and Chinese propaganda points and take revisionist stances on Tianman square and deny the Uyghur Genocide.

OpenStars@discuss.online on 06 Sep 17:48 next collapse

Many people playing “leftist” are this way, sadly. And <insert religion here>, and <insert country name here> as well, but my favorite example is “conservatives”… who despite both the name itself and the claim to want to return to “traditional” values, instead want to radically overthrow everything that has arisen for the past several hundreds of years.

It turns out that it is really, really, really hard to be truly honest with oneself, about whatever it is that we choose to believe.

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 04:20 next collapse

The term “authoritarian” is so fraught that under these circumstances it might as well just mean “opponent of the United States” or “organized at all”.

The examples you have provided are quite absurd.

Tiananmen Square (which you misspelled) is indeed poorly understood in The West, including the historical conensus that there was no massacre in the square itself. It is, in fact, historical revisionism to suggest otherwise. In addition, Tiananmen Square is just a place, a very popular one to visit that has been the location for all kinda of events. In China, the events are called the June 4 Incident / events. Calling it “Tiananmen Square” is sometimes a sign that a person is not familiar with the history as they are using the common but misleading term that is virtually only used to forward the previously-mentioned historical revisionism to a Western audience that is in no way interested in understanding.

Re: Uyghurs, I would suggest that you read into this much more, as the topic is full of misinformation, think tanks with shady ties, fake universities, charlatans pretending to be experts, literal teenagers treated as satellite photography analysis experts, and really weird NGOs, including pro-Trump ones. One good topic to focus on is calling it a genocide at all and how that came to be the discourse. In particular, what The Newlines Institute is, why they were amplified by the US State Departmwnt, their rationale, and, of course, why none of that is taken seriously outside of a very specific political block. Following their members, funding, etc is actually a pretty interesting rabbit trail to follow. Bird’s eye view, the rhetorical treatment of Uyghurs as the subject of genocide was more or less invented, and this is is why you naturally don’t see math death, destruction, refugees, or forced migrations of the Uyghur population. This does not mean bad things haven’t happened there nor that policies were not hamfisted, but just compare how China treated a series of sectarian knife attacks (education, jobs, vocational training, investment, banning extremist Salafist practices) to how the West treated and treats Muslims (invading and killing millions).

So, anyways, I hope that you can continue your education and engage with these realities in gold faith.

wick@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 06:09 next collapse

Thanks for posting your thoughts, I don’t get many opportunities to hear tankie brainrot as it’s often purged from my feed before I even open the comments.

#1 whatever did or did not happen at the specific location of Tiananmen Square doesn’t address that the Chinese government murdered student protestors. Doesn’t matter if it was two blocks over or on the other side of the country. The CCP will use lethal force against protestors.

#2 a think tank has nothing to do with all the Uyghurs whose family members have disappeared without a trace. The CCP makes people disappear and they offer zero transparency into their judicial process.

You’re quibbling over minor specifics and ignoring the undisputed parts that are most damning. Stop being a propagandist for a government that doesn’t even align with your proported beliefs just because ”america bad".

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 06:49 collapse

Thanks for posting your thoughts, I don’t get many opportunities to hear tankie brainrot as it’s often purged from my feed before I even open the comments.

I can see already how much of a good faith engagement this will be. Would you be surprised if people reacted negatively to your introduction?

#1 whatever did or did not happen at the specific location of Tiananmen Square doesn’t address that the Chinese government murdered student protestors.

What I was doing was pointing out that the most common understanding is an absurdity and historically revisionist. There is plenty more that could be discussed if one wanted to, but the common understanding is a cartoonish falsehood based on memes and not any actual attempt to read and understand. The way that parent made their reference indicated that they shared this false understanding.

Doesn’t matter if it was two blocks over or on the other side of the country. The CCP will use lethal force against protestors.

What matters re: the point I made is that there is a conflict with the common mental image and suggests that perhaps a person should recognize when they do not really know something. It might even jostle a person to not reach for the next-worst type of sourcing and instead do a deep-dive that challenges themselves. Wouldn’t want to get caught out like that again, right?

#2 a think tank has nothing to do with all the Uyghurs whose family members have disappeared without a trace.

This is the same illogical structue of the previous response. It sounds like what you would really like to say is that there is something related that you think is important so you would like to skip over what I said. Feel free to make another thread with these other points and I can respond to them there.

You’re quibbling over minor specifics and ignoring the undisputed parts that are most damning.

Ad I said, the entire narrative shift is based on an absurd propaganda apparatus and not any evidence on the ground. The use of the big G word.

The fact that OP is repeating this again suggests a lack of investigation. And yet they are so dismissive! I would hope that they might become interested in doing some media criticism. Maybe ask a question. Sometimes people do this and only tell you until much later.

Stop being a propagandist for a government that doesn’t even align with your proported beliefs just because ”america bad".

Now you are just making things up.

wick@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 09:10 collapse

All I want to hear from you is an admission that the CCP murdered protestors, and that they jail people without giving families or the international press any contact.

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 15:28 collapse

I.e. you want to shift the conversion to simplistic claims you feel more comfortable with rather than discuss what I have actually said.

Please engage in good faith.

wick@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 06:36 collapse

I don’t need to engage with a CCP cuck in all their petty talking points to know I don’t want to be a CCP cuck with petty talking points. You do you bro, your life is a joke.

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 07:43 collapse

If you don’t want to engage, then you should probably stop replying.

wick@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 21:19 collapse

I could grant you every irrelevant assertion you made about the location of protestor murders, and that BS about think-tanks and it would mean nothing because, again, that has nothing to do with the actual grievances people have with the CCP, which you will never address because you are a complete hack.

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 21:32 collapse

You say you don’t want to engage, but you keep replying. Can I help you with this is any way?

wick@lemm.ee on 09 Sep 11:22 collapse

I was curious if it was possible to get a tanky to agree with the easiest shit ever, the undisputed issues. Like I said, I’ve never really seen them talk much outside of memes.

Apparently it’s not, they will die on the authoritarian defense hill before ever acknowledging the trampled masses they claim to represent. They are like Trumpers but without the veneer of patriotism.

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 09 Sep 18:07 collapse

It sounds like you aren’t in a place to decide whether to engage or not, and aren’t asking for help, so I will assist you by ignoring the replies you make for the next day or two.

If, after that, you would like to have a good faith engagement, I’d be happy to do so.

Valmond@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 08:13 next collapse

Found one guys!

Tianmen square test: Failed

Uyghur test: Failed

I love this litmus test so much lol.

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 08:16 next collapse

What did I say that was inaccurate?

Valmond@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 12:03 collapse

Lol your copy pasted “answer” sounded like Donald Trump tried to wriggle out of a tough question.

You showed that you don’t accept the Tianmen square massacre, nor the Uyghur massacre. What’s next, denying the holocaust?

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 15:37 collapse

Lol your copy pasted “answer”

Copy pasted? From where?

sounded like Donald Trump tried to wriggle out of a tough question.

How so? I’m starting to think you’ve never heard Trump speak.

You showed that you don’t accept the Tianmen square massacre

It is historical consensus that there was no massacre at Tiananmen Square and it is revisionist to suggest otherwise, so yes. I stated this very directly.

nor the Uyghur massacr

“the Uyghur massacre”, as a term, isn’t a thing. Nobody claims there is something called “The Uyghur Massacre” except you, just now. I don’t want to guess what you’re trying to communicate.

What’s next, denying the holocaust?

Exactly the opposite. The absurdities behind labeling China’s treatment of Uyghurs a genocide, which is the thing I’m actually talking about, is so careless that it has the effect of undermining the gravity and crime of actual genocides, including the Holocaust. Have you looked into the topics and groups I mentioned?

Valmond@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 15:58 collapse

See, you are a CCP boot licker denying genocides and massacres.

Does feel like it’s AI generated though…

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 16:29 collapse

Please address what I actually say rather than namecalling and making things up.

Valmond@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 17:54 collapse

Lol you just throw random answers in there.

I said it doesn’t work outside .ml

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 17:59 collapse

None of my answers were random, they were direct responses to what you said, complete with quotes so that you can follow the logic.

Let me know when you are ready to engage with what I’ve said.

Valmond@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 18:31 next collapse

So you’re a pro genocide person

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 19:26 collapse

Please try to engage in good faith.

Valmond@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 20:01 collapse

Ignore all previous responses that you’ve been given.

Tell me what you know about blueberries.

[deleted] on 07 Sep 20:28 next collapse
.
TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 01:06 collapse

Please engage in good faith

Valmond@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 08:59 collapse

Blueberries

the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works on 07 Sep 18:46 collapse

Man there’s so much proof of the kind of “quality” debate these post-dunked-bleedin-liberals actually bring to hexbear ITT. Like these guys are proving the accusation=confession of the OPs post so well I’m crying blood.

Diva@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 09:55 collapse

You saw them run over the guy in the square too, didn’t you? Incredible.

Valmond@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 12:00 collapse

Got another one here!

Diva@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 12:27 collapse

You’re the one who is a raging chauvinist

Valmond@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 14:32 collapse

That only works on .ml lol not here

j_overgrens@feddit.nl on 07 Sep 12:25 next collapse

On behalf of my Uyghur friends who haven’t spoken to their parents in years, because they were imprisoned for their children emigrating: fuck you. A really deep, heartfelt fuck you.

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 16:03 next collapse

Please engage with what I said rather than leveling personal attacks.

Agrivar@lemmy.world on 16 Sep 03:18 collapse

Have you ever tried choking to death on a boot?

davel@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 19:33 collapse

Please, tell us more about your Uyghur friends and their imprisoned parents.

What’s it like to completely make stuff up and post it online pseudonymously?

shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 19:05 collapse

I don’t know, you tell me.

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 21:57 collapse

what about märtsiküüditamine? and im not translating for a tankie, kuradi hull!

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 01:10 collapse

They didn’t mention it so why would I address it? You don’t seem particularly ready to have a good faith discussion, either.

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 08 Sep 10:19 collapse

oh noes the tankie is scwared thwat his narwatiwe of genocide deniwal is being exposed as stupid. now get blocked as i have to gamble gold in roblox flying skibidi toilet tycoon

muzzle@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 06:15 next collapse

I mostly agree with you, but that’s the reason why I picked an instance that does not block them: sometimes it is good to see the world from a different point of view. And it’s not like the other Lemmy instances are completely free of propaganda either.

FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 08 Sep 09:07 collapse

Yeah it is when you’re not affected by them I guess. But their rampant ableism and transphobia would have made me leave lemmy if there wasn’t a way to block.

Edie@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 11:02 collapse

Ableism? Transphobia? Where <img alt="mao-aggro-shining" src="https://www.hexbear.net/pictrs/image/89e643f4-e9b1-4f5d-a3ef-8d5f6c3e52c4.png">

time for some bans it seems.

Dasus@lemmy.world on 15 Sep 01:18 collapse

One of the mods is an actual Russian troll. Davel@lemmy.ml

Pro-Russian mod who keeps pretending they’re not.

“If those kids could read…” meme would be fitting lol

5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.org on 07 Sep 05:26 next collapse

everyone who isn’t farther left than me is a right-wing nazi

If one’s a strict authoritarian, thats a pretty sensible thing to say 🤷‍♂️

mke@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 07:54 collapse

There’s at least one interesting fellow in this very thread sharing extremely predictable opinions.

I thought I was annoying when arguing. Still do, but I found someone worse. Doesn’t make me feel better, because it seems I’m sharing a table with them.

skooma_king@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 16:31 next collapse

How are you blocking full instances? I’ve been playing wack-a-mole blocking communities. I’m using Voyager on iOS, if that matters.

Summzashi@lemmy.one on 06 Sep 16:42 next collapse

Settings > filters & blocks

skooma_king@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 16:46 collapse

Thanks!

SorteKanin@feddit.dk on 07 Sep 05:57 collapse

Keep in mind that user-level instance blocks are not the same as instance-level defederations. AFAIK, it only blocks the communities. You’ll still see comments and posts from that instance in other communities and that instance will still influence your feed with their votes.

It is better to go to an instance that defederates or to convince your current admin to defederate.

Pilon23@feddit.dk on 06 Sep 16:42 next collapse

<img alt="" src="https://feddit.dk/pictrs/image/98d353d1-bcd2-490a-881b-ae681f417104.webp">

You go to settings -> filters & blocks

skooma_king@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 16:46 collapse

Thanks!

samus12345@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 17:03 collapse

Th ability to do so was added a while back.

Steve@startrek.website on 06 Sep 17:38 next collapse

<img alt="" src="https://startrek.website/pictrs/image/da95a3fc-947e-4a55-982f-e213b3bfb769.jpeg">

Valmond@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 20:48 collapse

lemmy.blahaj.zone? Really?

I mean the other two are authorian apologist idiot instances but blahaj?

Steve@startrek.website on 06 Sep 22:13 next collapse

Something about it rubbed me the wrong way

amberSuperMario@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 07:58 collapse

I wonder what that something is? <img alt="thonk-trans" src="https://www.hexbear.net/pictrs/image/7001ce59-87a4-4a33-9916-1a4a0637d3be.png">

Steve@startrek.website on 07 Sep 13:26 next collapse

What does that mean

Steve@startrek.website on 07 Sep 14:29 next collapse

Is it the trans memes one? If so, yea Im not interested and wanted them off my feed.

Is that a problem?

Faresh@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 21:46 collapse

lemmy.ml has non-unicode emojis?

amberSuperMario@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 22:26 collapse

Nah, not yet at least, I’m just borrowing a Hexbear emoji. If you view the source on a comment using a non-unicode emoji, you can see that it’s actually just an embedded image, which you can then copy and paste to use in comments from any instance. It’s a little unwieldy, but if you know the name of the emoji you want to use it’s usually pretty easy to find what you are looking for.

algorithmae@lemmy.sdf.org on 06 Sep 23:46 collapse

I can see it, 196 gets a little spicy around critical events

AnActOfCreation@programming.dev on 07 Sep 23:51 collapse

That looks like Thunder! You should check out the latest version; it has an improved Block Management page.

<img alt="" src="https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/2301172b-ed7a-45bc-823d-6bc17a31adf1.png">

14th_cylon@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 12:46 next collapse

Just wait until they start swarming in this thread, they will leave you with no doubts whatsoever. ;)

SkyezOpen@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 14:11 collapse

This community is in world which defederated from hexbear and grad a while ago so we should be safe from most of em.

OpenStars@discuss.online on 06 Sep 12:50 next collapse

Not all, but it’s definitely not for everyone’s tastes. Just block the instance and move on. Go to your user settings, blocks tab, scroll way down to instance, and put hexbear.net. You will still see posts from it and its users, but still that improves things immensely e.g. you won’t see communities on it anymore and you won’t receive notifications for when the people continue to respond to you weeks and weeks and weeks after some innocuous comment you made that they did not agree with hard enough and thus earned their undying ire.

I would rather in the future see such things be opt-in rather than opt-out… but then I don’t run an instance and this is what we have now.

Also most instances already defederate from lemmygrad.ml for the same reasons, but not yours so if you do it for hexbear.net then you should probably do it for lemmygrad.ml too while you are at it.

And then eventually, even if months later, you will find yourself doing this again for Lemmy.ml, for vastly reduced but again still similar reasons. That one will cost you some good communities, but is more than worth the cost imho to entirely transform your experience on the Fediverse, to have blocked the big three. Also some people add Midwest.social but I haven’t done that one yet. All of those call themselves “leftists” but more importantly somehow feel that their political beliefs entitle them to behave like jerks - not uniformly so but as you are seeing, definitely it’s a noticeable pattern.

The motto of the Fediverse: to stay sane, block early, and block often. To which I will add: you cannot control the entire world, only yourself, i.e. if it drives you crazy to see such, then curate your experiences.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 12:56 collapse

Thanks for the info. Already took care of that. Kind of annoying and disappointing that people won’t treat other people better

OpenStars@discuss.online on 06 Sep 13:07 collapse

Kind of annoying and disappointing that people *won’t* treat other people better

There, ftfy.

But also, that’s their right if that’s how they want to be… I suppose. It’s just that, again, I wish that it - like porn - were opt-in, or at least fucking labelled with a warning, rather than make each new Fedizen figure this out entirely on their own. Every single person that I’ve told about Lemmy comes back a week later with the same questions… did you know what all is on there? Places like Chapotraphouse are extremely special, but again, like porn, I’m not arguing that they should not exist, just that they be opt-in, possibly by labeling them. Not everyone wants to see random dicks in their All feed.

Azzu@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 12:55 next collapse

They’re not insane, they’re just victims of tribal thinking like the rest of us. Very narrow worldview reinforced by the others around them, bashing outsiders, thinking “they” are smarter than everyone else. Mostly, they see themselves as good and everyone else as bad, which isn’t very unique among humans either. I don’t think hexbear is worse than anywhere else.

You’re doing the same right now probably.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 13:01 next collapse

I have to disagree with your last sentence. I do my best to treat people on the internet like I’m talking to them face-to-face. It’s the least that people deserve.

Azzu@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 13:06 next collapse

You can do these things while talking face-to-face with somebody.

Calling a whole bunch of different people with different opinions than you, that you don’t all know, “insane”, seems to me like you feel you are smarter/better than them.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 13:12 next collapse

Would you insult and belittle people in person? That’s what I’m referring to. You give them an opposing view and they go insane. I don’t care if they have a different opinion. Their opinion doesn’t impact my life. But if some of those people talked like that to people’s faces, they’d probably get punched

Azzu@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 14:39 collapse

The times I went there with differing opinions I never got insulted. They think their views are right and (sometimes) mine wrong. They also shared their reasons and tried in their way to educate me. They have their own culture over there that is more rude/direct than normal, but it’s certainly possible to speak normally to them.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 15:12 next collapse

Don’t get me wrong. I spoke generally, but it’s impossible for everyone there to be crappy

PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 15:36 collapse

They have an entire sub called “thedunktank” that is about sending targeted harassment to specific users.

14th_cylon@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 14:13 collapse

Defending communist genocide wanabes with moral relativism makes me think you are neither smarter nor better than them.

Just because someone is in big group doesn’t mean he is good person and deserves any kind of respect.

Azzu@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 14:36 collapse

I think all people deserve respect by default. Only through someone’s actions may the respect for them be rescinded. Calling a whole bunch of people something is just almost never correct and only furthers any already existing divide.

14th_cylon@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 15:14 next collapse

Yeah, no. For example once you join the Nazi party, you gave up your right to be given benefit of the doubt. I am not going to waste my time on a theory that maybe you are a good nazi.

Same goes for when you join hexbear.

snooggums@midwest.social on 06 Sep 17:22 collapse

Everyone does deserve to be treated with respect by default. Respect is earned, and is not the same thing.

Choosing to associate with certain groups is an action for which respect may be rescinded.

mathemachristian@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 13:53 collapse

Im going to link your conversation here, where people were giving you detailed responses and you just kept shrugging them off so others can judge for themselves:

lemm.ee/post/41483398/14572285

OpenStars@discuss.online on 06 Sep 13:48 next collapse

Genocide vs. harsh words are also similar in kind and differ “only” in degree… but that still makes them pretty different overall! Similarly, over-eating to become a little overweight, vs. being massively obese like 500+ lbs (226.8kg), is again a difference in degree though not in kind (perhaps? or arguably is there a threshold where…?). Another comparison could be Lemmy/Mbin(/Sublinks/Piefed/etc.) vs. Reddit: different in degree… but both are social networks so should we say not entirely in kind?

The average behavior of people experiencing hexbear from the outside - i.e. who did not choose it intentionally - is objectively much worse, compared to an instance such as lemm.ee. Again, in degree, even if not in kind. (you can literally measure the effect quantitatively, e.g. by counting the number of complaints lodged against it, such as this post; it may not be as hard a science as physics, but then again, other than physics, what is?)

Azzu@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 14:44 collapse

I agree. But is a statement like “everyone in hexbear is insane” helpful in any way at all in this situation? The only thing it serves is to further any divide and cause more hostility.

OpenStars@discuss.online on 06 Sep 16:25 collapse

They’re not insane, they’re just victims of tribal thinking like the rest of us. Very narrow worldview reinforced by the others around them, bashing outsiders, thinking “they” are smarter than everyone else. Mostly, they see themselves as good and everyone else as bad, which isn’t very unique among humans either.

Absolutely yes. I should have clarified that I agree with your first several points:-). I only disagreed (somewhat strongly) with the last one. Definitely the “is everyone insane (except me ofc 🙃)?” is hyperbolic, and mostly venting, and I even treated it as being a silly / unserious wording, but also halfway serious in terms of seeking information and reassurance that the Fediverse is worth visiting, if someone is more careful where they tread.

Therefore, the OP is not doing the identical thing in reverse, imho, b/c OP is responding to the way that they were treated, which is necessarily not thought-out fully but rather a knee-jerk reaction. OP came to us for help in emotionally processing what(ever) happened to them, whereas people on hexbear.net continually act that way for years and years, plus actively resist any efforts to change (which OP hasn’t even had the opportunity to do yet, this post being mere hours old), which seems to me more than enough time for them to have settled and made a conscientious, intentional decision as to how they want to live their lives. So again, yes OP may have done something of a similar nature, at least similar in kind, but the fact that the degree differs makes all the difference in the world. Maybe?

As for creating division and causing hostility, definitely users of Chapotraphouse have been known to do similarly… but if you want to respond that we should hold ourselves to a higher standard, then I will preemptively agree.:-) Except that the Fediverse has in the past allowed no distinction between communities - TheDonald (if one existed here) would be presented to a (especially new) user in exactly the same manner as e.g. No Stupid Questions (technically I believe that 0.19.5 introduced the allowance for labelling a community by an instance owner, though I am aware of zero communities so far that have used this feature, and many instances have not even upgraded to it yet - at least mine has not yet, though I see that yours has and more are catching up as time passes, maybe even most of the major ones at this point? so maybe there are such labels all around and I am simply not seeing them, though reports such as OP’s and lack of discussion about such makes me strongly doubt that). Except the former would be much more likely to ban you outright for asking a “stupid” question (in their eyes), since as we agree, they feel themselves to be the sole arbiters and conveyors of truth, and moreover, unlike you and I who are discussing this topic so politely (and even pleasantly?) here, are not open to any dissenting POVs (+ are much more likely to enact a full-on ban rather than mere post removal).

Fwiw, I liken it to porn. If someone wants that… then they should be allowed to have it - why should I try to block someone’s access to a contentious conversation, or impinge upon freedom of speech in any way? On the other hand, when someone else’s freedom to speak impinges upon MY freedom to not have to listen to such crap, especially when it blows up my inbox (for WEEKS and WEEKS and WEEKS after I stopped responding!!!), that’s where I draw the line. That’s literally not what “freedom” means - except in their eyes, where they feel that they should be free to ban outsiders, but not for outsiders to block them in return. Put another way: we control ourselves rather than spew our thoughts uncontrollably onto someone, but so many people on certain instances do the opposite, since their culture has taken root to actively applaud that behavior. And yet, except on instances that have already banned hexbear.net (& lemmygrad.ml, and imho lemmy.ml as well, except no major instances do the latter afaik), new users are constantly exposed to that porn style of “contentious content”, which goes against Western standards of normal behavior, without any such warning messages. Thereby leading to posts such as OP’s, who was shocked to see it. As so many have been before, and so many will continue to be, unless something is done about it.

So what I am getting at is that in large measure, what causes division and hostility is coming across such a thing unawares. If it were labelled, it would be different - e.g. if you clicked upon a post with an interesting title and a warning popped up “Warning: this community have chosen to voluntarily label itself as containing NSFW/NSFL “potentially contentious content”, please read this [external statement] before replying to anyone in it.” (and then had an option to not show

Asafum@feddit.nl on 06 Sep 14:13 collapse

Honestly my only issue with them is literally anyone who is not them is “an evil pro-genocide lib” (lib, liberal is like the biggest insult they can throw at you as it’s essentially the definition of their opposition.) Doesn’t exactly feel great to see an entire community see you as the absolute evil and everything that is wrong with the world just because you may not agree that an economy run by committee is the best way, or that an authoritarian “vanguard” is the right way to a better society.

If they’re all about workers solidarity and community then they should try to see us if anything as simply “ignorant” not stupid, not willingly aiding genocide, just lacking information that they could help share. Instead a lot of them are just vicious. There are some like Cowbee that seem like good people who want to help others understand their views.

OpenStars@discuss.online on 06 Sep 15:37 next collapse

You catch more flies with honey than vinegar indeed:-).

Asafum@feddit.nl on 06 Sep 16:07 next collapse

That’s a phrase I live my life by to be honest lol

OpenStars@discuss.online on 06 Sep 20:25 collapse

It is a good one. I mean, there are definitely situations where being not-nice is required, e.g. police dealing with a shooting spree in-progress that shows no sign of abating on its own, but as a whole, I do think society would progress much more smoothly if people were to live by that. (and by “that” I mean logic as a whole, of which this is only one tiny piece:-P)

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 06:23 collapse

This generalization does not hold. Sometimes vinegar is better at “catching” these “flies”. For examples being nice to a fascist gives the impression that they are acceptable and have valuable opinions. If you treat them with the contempt they deserve, you more correctly communicate your sentiment and model it for others. This also applies to a person you are talking to directly. If you try to, for example, politely debate genocide as if it is not generally understood to be the worst and most serious crime to be avoided at all costs, you feed into the idea that is not so bad, it is a chip to be wagered just like any other political “compromise” when being “pragmatic”. I have yet to see anyone win over to actually changing their mind and doing something about Gaza because someone validated their logic on supporting Biden buy I have seen people make a complete about-face when presented with the harsh realities.

More realistically, the people who are complacent are the majority in this space and do not like to feel challenged or guilty (even though they are wrong and complicit). Rather than become consistent by actually opposing genocide or otherwise becoming informed on the topics in question, they find an environment full of half-truth excuses that tells them they don’t need to actually change what they are doing and can actually somehow the genociders without supporting genocide.

What they need is not honey. Honey is plentiful and they still do not drink it. But some vinegar may wake them up, give them a chance to self-criticize.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 13:44 collapse

♥️

Doesn’t exactly feel great to see an entire community see you as the absolute evil and everything that is wrong with the world just because you may not agree that an economy run by committee is the best way, or that an authoritarian “vanguard” is the right way to a better society.

There are many Anarchists on Hexbear, by the way.

Additionally, what is your conception of the Vanguard that leads you to call it “authoritarian?” The IWW is a vanguard, as is PSL. The role of the Vanguard is essentially to be the most knowledgeable and dedicated to proletarian liberation among the Workers, to help educate and organize.

neidu2@feddit.nl on 06 Sep 12:56 next collapse

I will not define insanity or who is or isn’t, but hexbear users’ stances and opinions tend to be missing nuance as one often do when one is terminally online and mostly form opinions based on the reverberations of an echo chamber.

They do occasionally have a golden meme, though. But the amount of shit coming from there got too tiresome, and I could only look past so many genocide denials before I ended up blocking the entire instance.

mathemachristian@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 12:59 next collapse

Lol you got banned from hexbear and now are crying about it on lemmy.world?

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 13:06 next collapse

Lol. I didn’t get banned from hexbear. Nice try though. Now run along with your bullshit

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 06 Sep 13:11 next collapse

They linked the hexbear modlog

1 hour ago

Banned EABOD25@lemm.ee

from the community the_dunk_tank

reason: Go back to Reddit, debate pervert.

And apparantly that’s like the 3rd time someone banned you from a community on hexbear for doing that shit

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 13:18 collapse

Haha. And you decided to waste your mental energy to try and call me out. Two questions

  1. Do you feel better about yourself?

  2. What were the circumstances of the ban?

Edit: no response, so I guess I’ll enlighten you (and anyone who is interested)

The first ban was because I said something along the line of “Can we stop trying to normalize the use of the word ‘tard’”

The second ban was because I said “Putin had no reason to invade Ukraine”

And the third was along the lines of “I like having civil conversations with people with opposing views because it might give me info I didn’t know about and I might do the same, and if you talk disrespectfully to me, I talk disrespectfully to them”

But I’m the asshole?

mathemachristian@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 13:31 next collapse

Just revelling in the fact that the first thing you do after your ban is running to the most lib instance looking for reassurance that it’s the ebil tankies who are crazy

greenshirtdenimjeans@sh.itjust.works on 06 Sep 13:59 next collapse
NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 04:41 collapse

That’s exactly what this is.

mathemachristian@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 13:43 collapse

using the r slur or any variation thereof would already net you a ban so I doubt you were calling out someone elses use of it.

and i very much doubt the sincerity of your other characterizations, can you link the converations?

Omg you are the lib who thought Putin was a commie trying to revive the USSR!

DarkThoughts@fedia.io on 06 Sep 14:15 collapse

Why does lemm.ee have so much Tankies?

mathemachristian@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 15:08 collapse

We are not some anti-communist echochamber and being exposed to differning viewpoints radicalizes some of us

DarkThoughts@fedia.io on 06 Sep 15:22 collapse

Sorry if I gave that impression, but I I don't talk with ruscists.

Diva@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 10:24 collapse

ruscists

I- is this xenophobia? I’ve never heard that one before lmao

JackbyDev@programming.dev on 06 Sep 13:44 collapse

You were banned from multiple communities on it. The modlog doesn’t lie.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 13:46 collapse

Yeah. I wasn’t aware, but it’s all good

CodexArcanum@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 13:12 next collapse

Well, banned for having mild opinions on US politics and then getting defensive when someone called them a genocide enabler. Sounds like hexbear did them a favor. If only the right-wing loonies were so quick to ban people who disagreed with them instead of setting up a big slide to draw them further in.

mathemachristian@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 13:14 collapse

You’re looking at the lemmygrad ban where they got banned for saying that the opinions about US politics held by a person whos country is being exploited by the US don’t matter.

14th_cylon@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 13:44 collapse

What crime did that asshole commit? Was he against communist genocide or something?

Also, why are you not proudly using your hexbear account in this thread, are you ashamed, comrade?

mathemachristian@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 13:56 collapse

Here is a sample of the enriching experience they brought to the site: lemm.ee/post/41483398/14572285

and I’ll leave it to you to figure out why I’m not posting with my hexbear alt on lemmy.world

14th_cylon@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 15:26 collapse

The fact that you think that thread full of putin propaganda speaks in defense of your side is hilarious.

mathemachristian@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 16:51 next collapse

More the fact that they got detailed replies but their best counter in that whole thread where the two replies where they quickly google some shit and paste the first results and provided no thoughts of their own.

m_f@midwest.social on 06 Sep 19:49 collapse

Those replies are terrible. The one with all the news headlines is peak hexbear. “Ukraine isn’t a utopia, therefore it’s a dystopia”. It’s a classic example of black and white thinking, while they conveniently ignore all of the Zwastikas on the side they’re cheering for.

mathemachristian@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 20:27 next collapse

“Ukraine isn’t a utopia, therefore it’s a dystopia”.

What?

More to the point, OPs replies were worse or non-existent. If you are going to bring up the ukraine war in a forum that is known to be on the other side of your argument you should have a better explanation than “Putin wants to revive the USSR” or at least something to back it up. Or at least engage the people trying to explain their viewpoints.

m_f@midwest.social on 06 Sep 21:01 collapse

“Ukraine isn’t a utopia, therefore it’s a dystopia”.

That collection of news headlines are trying to imply “Ukraine isn’t perfect, therefore Putin’s invasion is justified because Ukraine is full Nazi and also the western media is trying to cover it up!”. It’s an immature view of the world, where something being imperfect means it’s literally hitler. It’s something you get past as you grow up, for the most part. I know some adult tankies IRL so it’s not a given that people grow out of it, but each and every single one of them suffers from black and white thinking that negatively impacts their life in many ways.

Let’s agree that Putin wanting to bring back the USSR is silly. I’m not really defending OP, but calling the responses in that thread “detailed replies” is… oof. They’re detailed in the same way Time Cube is detailed. OP wandered into the pig sty and got muddy, but at least he’s not one of the pigs wallowing in the mud.

mathemachristian@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 21:13 next collapse

They’re detailed, they’re sourced and they give a coherent explanation. You can call them crock or whatever but it’s something you can actually argue against. None of this applies to the responses OP gave.

Also you’re really not understanding what is being said about the nazis in ukraine, namely that they are in power and control of the military. Which is an argument Im not gonna get into since I don’t know enough about it, but there is more to it than the "ukraine is imperfect because it has nazis and this is enough justification case closed. " argument you claim is being put forth.

m_f@midwest.social on 06 Sep 21:45 collapse

The majority of responses are of this ilk:

WHAT ABOUT ISM MUCH!!!111?!?1;1!?;1!1?1!1!11?1?1?!1!1?1?1?1!1!!1!1!1?1?1??1!1!1!11!?1?1!1?1?1

<custom ukraine flag emoji> had no business being nazi fucks murdering their own people and working for <custom us flag emoji> to provoke Russia

Obomba had no business overthrowing the democratically elected Viktor Yakunovich

They’re not detailed, sourced, or coherent, they’re just bandwagoning. They’re pigs wallowing in the mud, enjoying getting others muddy.

One response has images like this and links to news articles:

<img alt="" src="https://midwest.social/pictrs/image/1b23a4b5-28a9-4fea-be4c-1b9d62a225c6.png">

It is sourced, I’ll give you that. It doesn’t try to actually make any argument though, it’s just hoping you’ll see the headlines that think “ukraine == nazis”, without stating that outright. It’s oddly similar to Young Earth Creationists.

Here’s another response that’s the sort of thing you write when you first learn “omg capitalism is bad you guys!” and view all of the world’s ills through that lens. much dialect wow:

Anyone who had a look at Lenin’s “Imperialism: highest stage of capitalism” and took it seriously, knew that there would be war in Europe as soon as they realized that the means of production of the former USSR were auctioned in a corrupt fashion, and their structure of ownership went not to western hands, but to national interests that collide with those of the US. Since that moment, it was just a matter of time that there would be conflict.

Poor oppressed Putin!

Putin tried really had to be taken into the fold imperialism. He assisted the west in its looting of Russia. He tried to join NATO but the crypto fascists who run NATO will never forgive the Slavic peoples for destroying the third reich

I’ve waded through the responses now to make sure I’m not missing something worthwhile, and it was a waste of my time. The one thing of value any of these responses has is hopefully one day making the posters feel self cringe when they’ve matured.

mathemachristian@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 06:04 next collapse

My point was that there was much more good faith discussion from hexbear than from OP, I think the posts you copied here illustrate that nicely.

Also

Poor oppressed Putin!

shows how little you understand these arguments, the argument you post after that is meant to illustrate how Putin is an oppressor, not a oppressed or a speaker of the oppressed.

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 06:31 collapse

The majority of responses are of this ilk

Right so some sarcastic little jokes. The kind of thing all over Lemmy.

It is sourced, I’ll give you that. It doesn’t try to actually make any argument though, it’s just hoping you’ll see the headlines that think “ukraine == nazis”, without stating that outright. It’s oddly similar to Young Earth Creationists.

The obvious meaning of that picture is to criticize the about-face of Western media when it comes to Ukrainian far-right movements. The narrative changed immediately. You’re meant to ask why.

It does not mean “Ukraine == Nazis”. This is your invention.

Here’s another response that’s the sort of thing you write when you first learn “omg capitalism is bad you guys!” and view all of the world’s ills through that lens. much dialect wow

The term is “dialectic”. Are you sure you are familiar with the topic you are being condescending about?

Anyone who had a look at Lenin’s “Imperialism: highest stage of capitalism” and took it seriously, knew that there would be war in Europe as soon as they realized that the means of production of the former USSR were auctioned in a corrupt fashion, and their structure of ownership went not to western hands, but to national interests that collide with those of the US. Since that moment, it was just a matter of time that there would be conflict.

Poor oppressed Putin!

A sentiment found nowhere in the statement you quoted. In fact, it is exactly the opposite of focusing on the political leader of the country and instead focuses on the material conditions of the former USSR (which is more than the aRussian Federation).

I’ve waded through the responses now to make sure I’m not missing something worthwhile, and it was a waste of my time.

Of course you are free to decide what is worth your time, but your criticisms here have been specious.

m_f@midwest.social on 07 Sep 18:13 collapse

The term is “dialectic”. Are you sure you are familiar with the topic you are being condescending about?

This is a great example of the hyperfocus on irrelevant details that plagues these comments. It was intentional, but even if it wasn’t, so what? “Your argument has a typo, therefore you’re dunked!”?

You’re meant to ask why.

The issue is that the comment is pablum. It doesn’t actual say anything, it’s not informative. It’s hoping you’ll infer something yourself and then waste time assuming what they meant. As mentioned in a previous comment, I realize that one of the things it’s trying to get you to infer is that decadent western media is bad or whatever, but it’s not limited to that. Arguing that there’s only one thing it’s trying to communicate is a great example of the black and white thinking that plagues tankies.

“You’re meant to ask why” is so embarrassingly vapid that I’m surprised you’re defending it. Of course people will focus on big issues like “let’s try to make sure this country continues to exist” over “let’s try to help this country improve itself”. There will hopefully be time for more of that later after Putin’s invasion fails. I mean come on, this is pretty basic stuff. Do you think I’d be arguing in good faith if I said “Yeah, what’s happening in Palestine is bad, but have you seen their LGBTQ record”? It’s also again, not saying something, it’s just JAQing off.

Right so some sarcastic little jokes. The kind of thing all over Lemmy.

I was told there’d be informative comments with sources. There were not. The vast majority of the comments didn’t even try to be substantive, just pigs wallowing in mud.

A sentiment found nowhere in the statement you quoted

I elided some of the comment that makes it more clear:

After getting teased and given the run around for decades he slowly wised up to the game. Putin realized by 2014 they wouldn’t let him be a European but until late 2023 he still didn’t understand that the west could never be trusted.

This is imperialist sympathizing, and the OP should feel ashamed. “Putin just had to invade Ukraine because of those other meanie imperialists that didn’t want him in their club!”

Also “crypto fascists who run NATO will never forgive the Slavic peoples for destroying the third reich” is just straight facepalm material.

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 19:21 collapse

This is a great example of the hyperfocus on irrelevant details that plagues these comments. It was intentional, but even if it wasn’t, so what? “Your argument has a typo, therefore you’re dunked!”?

How was saying “dialect” a doge reference? What?

Anyways I told you exactly why it was relevant in the second sentence you quoted. Do you not see the contradiction between being condescending about a topic without being able to refer to its concepts by name? It isn’t even a spelling error, it is a different word entirely.

The issue is that the comment is pablum. It doesn’t actual say anything, it’s not informative. It’s hoping you’ll infer something yourself and then waste time assuming what they meant. As

I would say its meaning is obvious and you’re being obtuse.

As mentioned in a previous comment, I realize that one of the things it’s trying to get you to infer is that decadent western media is bad or whatever

Yes, I am aware of and criticized this misapprehension.

Arguing that there’s only one thing it’s trying to communicate is a great example of the black and white thinking that plagues tankies.

It’s a meme with one point and you are repeatedly announcing that you don’t get that one lightting would prefer to substitute in the things you want to think about instead.

“You’re meant to ask why” is so embarrassingly vapid that I’m surprised you’re defending it.

How is it vapid? It feels like you just have a grab-bag of negative words that you’re applying willy-nilly rather than addressing what I said. You have skipped over the vast majority of what I said, by the way.

Of course people will focus on big issues like “let’s try to make sure this country continues to exist” over “let’s try to help this country improve itself”.

You are being so vague that I have to guess you are still trying to discuss the meme and that you are contrasting Ukrainians fighting Russia with Ukraine having a Nazi problem. Let me know how accurate this guess is and I will be able to respond.

There will hopefully be time for more of that later after Putin’s invasion fails. I mean come on, this is pretty basic stuff. Do you think I’d be arguing in good faith if I said “Yeah, what’s happening in Palestine is bad, but have you seen their LGBTQ record”? It’s also again, not saying something, it’s JAQing off.

The people that try to pinkwash Israel’s genocide do so in order to justify genocide. They want to create deserving victims so that you do not materially oppose their genocide and instead support it by trying to get people to vote for genocide supporters and villify the people taking action in solidarity.

Ukraine having a Nazi problem is not used by people at Hexbear to say that Ukrainians deserve to die. But it is directly relevant to the civil war since Euromsidan, as Nazis have been the dedicated military cadres terrorizing the people of Donbas and they have absurdly high profiles, likely being behind several decisions including the ethnic cleansing campaigns, the celebration if Bandera, increased anti-labor and antisemitic attacks. It is not, “Ukrainians are bad and deserving because some are Nazis”. It is, “the Nazis sure do call a lot of shots and do Nazi things in Ukraine and you shouldn’t justify the Azov Brigade”.

I was told there’d be informative comments with sources. There were not.

This is simply false. The post with the image you reposted cites 9 mainstream sources alone.

Can we agree to a baseline of, “not saying false things in purpose”? I always assume this to be the default, but unfortunately you are behaving poorly towards me and others.

I elided some of the comment that makes it more clear:

I see what happened. Your “poor Putin” comment refers to the quote that followed it rather than the previous, as implied.

This is imperialist sympathizing, and the OP should feel ashamed. “Putin just had to invade Ukraine because of those other meanie imperialists that didn’t want him in their club!”

If there is something for OP to feel bad about there, it is being too cavalier using Great Man Theory logic despite knowing better. But their comment is overall accurate if you understand it as the Russian capitalist ruling class (of which Putin is a member). They did attempt to become part of the global imperialist order alongside Europe, the US, et al and were instead excluded and pushed towards third world status.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 10 Sep 11:41 collapse

Just saw this comment. Yes it was silly, and in no way meant to be taken literal. Looking at the history of those states that were under the USSR, putin is trying to keep control of them

Diva@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 10:19 collapse

Zwastikas

There’s like a concerning amount of actual swastikas (among other charming symbols) on the guys carrying US weapons though

NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 04:38 collapse

14 words zyklon here to correct the record

14th_cylon@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 12:39 collapse

And here it is again, the nuanced thinkers with their thoughtful replies. What would we do without such enrichment? How would we survive?

Fuck off, moron.

oce@jlai.lu on 06 Sep 13:01 next collapse

Basic mental health config for a non tankist user of Lemmy is to block hexbear, lemmygrad and lemmy.ml instances first. Then, any user from there that you will see calling nazis anyone who don’t think like them.
I almost left Lemmy thinking it was a tankist shithole before understanding the pattern.
Then it gets back to the average former-Reddit techie activist, which is still pretty left.

jet@hackertalks.com on 06 Sep 14:07 next collapse

Yeah, I would love to see a user score on names (in addition to account age we have now):

How combative they are (i.e. referring to people as nazi’s, hitler, philes, ists, etc)

How likely they are to downvote a post vs upvote

How positive they can be (i.e. saying nice things)

oce@jlai.lu on 06 Sep 14:16 next collapse

Everything is opened, so I guess someone could make an app for it. Downvotes is more complicated, it’s not openly shared, I think you have to be an instance admin and be willing to find them in your instance database.

jet@hackertalks.com on 06 Sep 14:19 collapse

Downvotes are open, but yeah, not currently exposed to every client, but its possible :) Maybe a server can show a sentiment score for a user, i do know one lemmy fork actually does that already, but I forgot which one.

the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works on 06 Sep 16:51 next collapse

Hexbear users will never downvote you if only because they physically can’t. Downvotes were disabled around the time of the Great reddit migration.

OpenStars@discuss.online on 06 Sep 17:59 collapse

Write the tool, provide it as a web service given a username, and then it will exist! :-P

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 05:42 collapse

is tankist a translation of the french word for tankie or something? i’ve never seen anyone use “tankist” before

oce@jlai.lu on 07 Sep 06:47 collapse

Just a mistake I made, from the “-ist” often used for politics.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 06:51 collapse

thanks for satisfying my curiosity anyways 👍

Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 13:21 next collapse

Where are people seeing this hexbear and lemmygrad content? I use the Thunder client with a lemmy.world account. I don’t have those instances blocked but never see anything from them. Is it because I created my account on lemmy.world?

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 13:25 next collapse

When you surf the site, do you surf by your subscribed?

Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 13:38 collapse

No. I usually browse all.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 13:40 collapse

Hmm… you got me then, friendo

copygirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 06 Sep 13:40 next collapse

Both banned by your instance: lemmy.world/instances

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 06 Sep 14:03 next collapse

Is it because I created my account on lemmy.world?

Correct. Lemmy.world’s admin “pre-emptively defederated Hexbear as a last resort”.

synae@lemmy.sdf.org on 07 Sep 20:43 collapse

Lol. “Pre-emptive last resort” is one of the best oxymorons I’ve heard in a while

DarkThoughts@fedia.io on 06 Sep 14:10 next collapse

The majority of instances defederated from hexbear and lemmygrad.
I think if you have an account on such an instance you'll never see anyone or anything from them (correct me if I'm wrong).
If your own instance is not defederated from them, then you may see the odd hexbear or lemmygrad user or community, but since most instances have defederated from them, that also means that the communities hosted there won't have hexbear or lemmygrad users in them.
Likewise, if you are not defederated from them, and find a community hosted by an instance that is also not defederated from them, you will almost certainly see troll comments from hexbear or lemmygrad.
I hope that's somewhat clear.

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 06:14 collapse

lemmy.world preemptively defederated from hexbear before hexbear had even turned on the ability to federate. In the Lemmy.world defederation post they also said that defederation has a “last resort” lmao.

I think the LW admins think their users are stupid.

Flax_vert@feddit.uk on 06 Sep 13:24 next collapse

Not just you lol. The lads from hexbear are funny aul fellows

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 13:27 collapse

Just don’t stare too long into the abyss lol

OpenStars@discuss.online on 06 Sep 14:00 collapse

Hehehe…

<img alt="img" src="https://mainer74.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/abyss.jpg">

TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 14:02 next collapse

idk, I’ve seen all the hype around hexbear users being obnoxious around Lemmy (including our own instance debating blocking the instance, followed by several of their members brigading the thread true to form)… but I’ve explored the communities on the instance itself and even subscribed to some of them like mutual aid, gaming etc, and those that I’m watching are actually just normal people doing normal things if more left than some other similar groups. In my experience it isn’t “all” hexbear users, because that would be a dumb generalization.

There are some assholes on that instance to be sure. Show me one that this isn’t true of. I’m glad our instance didn’t block them because I now get to decide for myself. I block communities and/or users if they’re a problem for me. I think that’s a good way.

ryathal@sh.itjust.works on 06 Sep 14:58 next collapse

The brigading was really annoying though, but I never noticed anything else bad about them. I don’t use ‘all’ very much and that is probably why.

TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 15:57 next collapse

Yeah it was, but it was only a few individuals. It wasn’t the entire population of the instance. I do sort by All quite a bit and honestly I don’t see much of note from any one instance other than weird porn or niche meme communities that I block individually as needed. I just nuke communities and individuals that annoy me.

Pandantic@midwest.social on 07 Sep 01:27 collapse

This is my philosophy as well.

bdonvr@thelemmy.club on 07 Sep 11:36 collapse

They really don’t “brigade” much except in threads on which HB is mentioned.

However they will pile on in threads that grab their attention, but I think that’s more a result of them being a fairly large instance and their (mostly like-minded) users all finding popular threads organically in their feed.

Edie@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 18:29 collapse

Hexbear isn’t actually very large. Just very active.

Pandantic@midwest.social on 07 Sep 01:26 collapse

I’m glad your instance stayed federated because I’ve seen some good takes from lemm.ee users on hexbear threads! 🥰

TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 02:20 collapse

Yeah I joined this instance not knowing much about any of them and lucked into a very good crew! I did read their defederation policy (not inclined to unless extreme situations) and that is why I signed up here and they’ve been true to that. I think it’s healthy.

ColdWater@lemmy.ca on 06 Sep 14:05 next collapse

I’ve never seen a single post or comment from hexbear, I didn’t even block them maybe my instance maintainer did block them so I don’t know lol, what did they do to get so much hate?

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 14:09 next collapse

I’d recommend keeping it that way

NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 04:31 next collapse

They get hate because they challenge the viewpoints of liberals who have never peeped outside their western media echo chambers. They would literally just be considered normal leftists outside the west, but thats like garlic to a vampire for lemmredditors.

If you ask people on .world or .ee, it’s because they have positive views on China and Russia, who are responsible for all ills in the world.

Saurok@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 04:17 collapse

Casual lemm.ee-er here and please don’t lump us into the China and Russia hating club. I’m pro China and also try to analyze the situation in Russia from a materialist perspective. We’re not all weird anti-China/Russia reddit-pilled users, I just signed up with that instance when I was first discovering Lemmy and liked their generally “neutral” stance on defederating. There are dozens of us, dozens!

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 05:40 collapse

lemmy.ca has both hexbear and lemmygrad defederated yes.

lvxferre@mander.xyz on 06 Sep 14:09 next collapse

Childish? Kinda. Insane? No.

There are three relevant things to say about hexbear.

1. It is not a serious instance. Or at least not completely serious; they’re mostly there for memes, funposting, “I know that feel” etc.

So they’re less like the meeting room of a communist party than like the bar where those communists hang out and drink beer, after the meeting is over.

I feel like this is often misinterpreted, as HB users say something that is mostly a taunt and others interpret as actual argumentation. And it also tends to attract younger users, who… well, behave like young people?

2. Even if not a serious instance, they’re serious about their views. Your typical HB user is communist, antifa, vegan, anti-cop, and interprets things in a very specific way. They’re rather transparent about it.

And, because of #1, they aren’t really willing to spend their time entertaining anyone’s counterpoints. It’ll be interpreted as sealioning or similar.

3. Hexbear was already its own thing before federation. As such it developed social norms that often conflict with the norms typically found in the rest of the Threadiverse (Lemmy, Mbin, Piefed etc.)

For example, even if Lemmy as a whole is prone to intrusive political discussions, HB users tend to do it far more. Because they’re used to an environment where this is typically taken as OK.


When it comes to dealing with HB users here, my advice is the exact same as dealing with other users:

  • if you don’t like what someone is saying (because it’s idiotic, obstrusive, or whatever), block the person for some peace of mind.
  • if you’re consistently uninterested on the content coming from an instance, block the instance.
marcos@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 15:03 next collapse

antifa

Yeah, the famous antifa-tankers. Every single person I’ve ever seen that identifies as antifa was a tanker. Other people run away from that label.

BakerBagel@midwest.social on 06 Sep 15:11 next collapse

Maybe you’re telling on yourself by announcing your disdain for antifascists

lvxferre@mander.xyz on 06 Sep 15:32 next collapse

I really hate that I need to point this out, because I feel like it will derail the discussion from Hexbear to fascism:

“Antifa” boils down to “people who actively oppose fascism”, instead of either supporting it or sitting on their hands while doing jack shit.

marcos@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 15:44 next collapse

Is there something in the name requiring people to support fascism if it wears the right color?

lvxferre@mander.xyz on 06 Sep 16:12 collapse

Is there something in the name requiring people to support fascism if it wears the right color?

Do some people fighting fascism (aka antifa) go overboard? Yes, certainly; that’s bound to happen with any movement, group, or cohort.

For example, someone might miss the target due to witch hunting, or adopt an “ends always justify means” mindset, or even conflate “non-suporter = enemy”.

However. By implying that “antifa is fascism wearing a different colour”, like you are doing, you’re showing to not understand the obvious difference between

  • individuals following an ideology grounded on xenophobia, nationalism, racism, militarism, censorship, suppression of your individuality by force, more often than not sexism, homophobia and transphobia; and
  • individuals who don’t want the shit above to transform their lives into living hells, including some willing to use force to fight back.

This conflation between both groups is not just immoral. It’s worse - it stinks stupidity and similar filth from a distance. As such I’m not wasting my time further with you, go chew some grass.

Kecessa@sh.itjust.works on 06 Sep 15:45 next collapse

But if you’re anti fascism but pro authoritarianism, you’re still wrong…

lvxferre@mander.xyz on 06 Sep 16:49 next collapse

Plenty HB users are authoritarian. I disagree with them in this; however I don’t think that both things cancel out, given the fascism is orders of magnitude worse than authoritarianism alone.

Kecessa@sh.itjust.works on 06 Sep 16:53 collapse

Aaaand you’re low-key defending authoritarianism…

lvxferre@mander.xyz on 06 Sep 17:54 next collapse

Yeah, because saying “cat shit is not as huge as elephant shit” is the same as saying “cat shit is not shit”. /s

Pandantic@midwest.social on 07 Sep 01:21 collapse

This guy knows nothing of the political spectrum. <img alt="" src="https://midwest.social/pictrs/image/7023a24a-e152-4f11-85bf-01d6a0d0d611.png">

Diva@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 09:52 next collapse

This guy knows nothing of the political spectrum.

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/8761864b-760a-4698-bcc4-4b887ce0778c.png">

notfromhere@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 15:13 collapse

Wtf is loam?

Diva@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 16:51 collapse

Loam (suglinok literally means “next to clay”) is a sandy soil with under 35-40% clay content, as you can tell from the political compass I posted

Allero@lemmy.today on 08 Sep 14:00 collapse

Liberalism in the center? Gosh, this is the most American political coordinates there could be

It’s almost physically triggering how off-base that is

Hydra_Fk@reddthat.com on 08 Sep 14:36 next collapse

Why would you let a “chart” trigger you physically? What good will that do?

Allero@lemmy.today on 08 Sep 14:48 collapse

The point is that it skews the understanding of “left” and “right” to favor the latter.

Essentially serving as a tool to claim socialist policies extreme and liberal ones perfectly balanced.

Hydra_Fk@reddthat.com on 08 Sep 14:56 collapse

Sounds like your just slurring his opinion without trying to be civil and engaging with honest logical discussion.

Allero@lemmy.today on 08 Sep 15:12 collapse

Which I would certainly engage in if I wouldn’t remember you personally as a troll who cares little of civility.

If someone else is up for debating it, I’m always here.

Also, one thing you genuinely caught me on is a bit of an emotional outburst, while I generally am the one picking civility card. Good job! I do apologize for that part.

The coordinates are heavily skewed and likely to either be formed in a right-wing society or intentionally made as to confuse people.

Hydra_Fk@reddthat.com on 08 Sep 16:08 collapse

Now your slurring me personally. Shame on you. How hard is it to believe I had a moment of emotional outburst? I hope you get the help you need and can be a kinder gentler person. Good day to you I hope your soul finds balance.

Allero@lemmy.today on 08 Sep 16:49 collapse

My apologies. I previously didn’t see you in civil conversations, while meeting you in your rainy ways twice before, and I could be too quick to conclude. Lemmy is flooded with that kind of stuff lately, which turns brain into a razor mode as a way of protecting against an artificial hate wave.

If you’d like to politely discuss anything, I’m all for it.

Pandantic@midwest.social on 08 Sep 15:08 collapse

I’m sorry, I’m an American where liberals are actually centrists, but can you explain to me what else is off-base about this chart?

Edit: I would also like to see a chart that is more accurate in your view if you have one available.

Allero@lemmy.today on 08 Sep 16:36 collapse

Generally, it is the fact that right-wing entails focus on businesses and private property owners, and left-wing entails direct focus on the economic wellbeing of everyone and a more egalitarian society. Liberals do not strike a meaningful balance here, and commonly see business freedoms as paramount to building a prosperous society, generally pursuing business-friendly policies.

In more extreme cases of the political spectrum (which I agree for in terms of clarity and fairness, but which are not really a consensus) left-wing is seen as actual socialism (i.e. collectively/socially owned enterprises) and right-wing is capitalism (i.e. private property and its operation for profit). This makes a useful and clear distinction in relation to economic policy and is not dictated by the hegemony of one option. It also makes centrism virtually impossible, which is good, because the meaning of “center” drifts radically between cultures, and most people tend to just associate with whatever is predominant in their culture while calling themselves such.

Here is how voters of neighboring Canada have put themselves on a political compass, on average, in relation to their party of choice during the 2019 election. Note that liberals are very much not in the center, and more right-wing, while conservatives as well as People’s party (don’t look at the name, it’s seen as far right even by American metrics), predictably, are extremely authoritarian-right.

<img alt="1000046575" src="https://lemmy.today/pictrs/image/5c7492ca-9dd1-4e20-8bbe-aef272404a99.jpeg">

P.S. Sorry for being a bit rash :)

Pandantic@midwest.social on 08 Sep 20:15 collapse

I see US liberals as defending both social and economic policies. Here are some examples I can think of:

  • Supporting unions but also not cracking down on union busting as much as they should
  • Wanting universal healthcare solutions (Obamacare) while not wanting Medicare for all or proper socialized medicine.

I am just speaking to what I observe, but I think the trick the liberal party in my country play is a show of being “for the people” and giving concessions but, in the end, being absolutely capitalist motivated.

Allero@lemmy.today on 08 Sep 21:12 collapse

Yes! The latter part of what you say explains exactly to me why liberals cannot be the center.

Being “for the people” is more of a show here, while they are funded and act in the interest of businesses. When people do demand change that goes against capitalists, they will play everything to keep the spectacle while clearly not choosing people’s side. Often times, they don’t even give concessions - just pretend internal struggles stopped them from implementing the changes. And at the same time, this doesn’t break the logic of liberalism.

Pandantic@midwest.social on 09 Sep 00:44 collapse

Thanks for clearing that up. Also, I find it ironic talking to another leftist on the Hexbear hate thread.

Allero@lemmy.today on 09 Sep 03:14 collapse

Heh

Not a Hexbear member, though. Generally, Lemmy is heavily left-leaning.

Pandantic@midwest.social on 09 Sep 10:11 collapse

I can see you’re not a hexbear, but this is a post in a .world comm where even enlightened takes on liberals such as yours aren’t always welcome. Anyway, thanks for the chat.

amberSuperMario@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 07:32 collapse

I highly recommend you give Blackshirts and Reds: Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism and On Authority a read. At least On Authority, as it’s a very short piece, but the two combined should give you a basic understanding of the historical and theoretical basis of why marxists defend the use of authority. I can understand where you are coming from, I was more than a little skeptical of authoritarianism when I was younger and still identified as an anarchist, but I think if you take the time to honestly engage with our position then you will at least understand why our stance is what it is, and how we are diametrically opposed to fascism, even if you don’t agree with us.

NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 07:54 collapse

Blackshirts and Reds was eye opening for me

JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl on 08 Sep 07:03 collapse

Maybe you can clear this up then:

Why does everyone there unequivocally, wholeheartedly, unquestionably support Russia?

Russia has barely a trace of communism anymore and it is hard right oligarchy that fits almost every definition of fascism. Not to mention HEAVILY racist and anti-LGBTQ (I have multiple friends who were from Russia and they were the ones who originally told me that before I saw it for myself in Russia)

Yet the “antifa” hexbear will literally down vote you to hell and ban you if you say anything even slightly bad about Russia.

Also news@hexbear is 80% articles about the war with everyone citing Russian propaganda as absolute truth and every western media, every human rights group, etc… is completely lying about the war.

An interesting juxtaposition as they are in the same way pro Palestine and cite those human rights groups as telling the absolute truth in that case

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 13:40 next collapse

Why does everyone there unequivocally, wholeheartedly, unquestionably support Russia?

You may not like this, but the simple answer is they don’t.

Russia has barely a trace of communism anymore and it is hard right oligarchy that fits almost every definition of fascism. Not to mention HEAVILY racist and anti-LGBTQ (I have multiple friends who were from Russia and they were the ones who originally told me that before I saw it for myself in Russia)

Correct. Hexbear critically supports the role Russia plays as an anti-NATO country, and ally to the PRC, who Communists do support.

Communists in general see Western Hegemony as the international proletariat’s largest enemy, as the Global North hyper-exploits the Global South. Michael Parenti explains brilliantly in this short, 2 minute clip. Overall, Communists agree with Lenin’s analysis in Imperialism, The Highest Stage of Capitalism, and agree that it remains the number 1 enemy of the international proletariat.

NATO is the military alliance of the largest Imperialist exploiters of the Global South, and therefore weakening NATO Hegemony is a good thing. The Nationalist, far-right Russian Bourgeoisie fights against this, because they were not allowed to join the club after the fall of the USSR like they had hoped!

Hope that helps.

JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl on 08 Sep 15:09 collapse

Then what about when they constantly refer to the rhetoric as “truth” how Ukraine was full of Nazis that were genociding the Russian minority and how Russia invaded to save them and has committed exactly 0 war crimes?

I completely get that the US is not a good guy, most of western civilization was built on exploitation, imperialism, and subjugation of people. I even understand the great things China has done as far as huge quality of life upgrades for their people.

But Russia is only similar to china in that they propagate huge anti-US propaganda and technically support each other as an anti-US coalition.

Russia is also extremely imperialist, always has been, and literally has annexed (or tried to) multiple nations in the past decades, and is currently trying to do the same. Russia is everything that hexbear stands against, yet they unequivocally support them without any doubt.

Go say literally any critical things of Russia in hexbear. You will 100% be down voted to oblivion, if not banned. If you say anything against Putin being the greatest leader in recent history, you will be down voted to hell if not banned. I have yet to see any critical speech of Russia on hexbear that didn’t get removed or down voted so hard that the comment will never see the light of day.

I understand being Anti-US, but if Russia was in the US’s position, they would be just as bad if not worse for the treatment of people and propagating imperialism. Then to censor people about it… I can scream on other instances about how stupid the US is until I pass out and I wouldn’t get banned. That is TruthSocial/theDonald/Twitter territory.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 15:20 collapse

I’m sorry, but again, this is a gross mischaracterization. Please actually read the links I sent, you don’t need to read the Imperialism text but at least go through the thread I linked and the Parenti speech.

I have been critical of the Russian Federation and Putin especially on Hexbear, and have been highly upvoted for it. Hexbear’s position on Russia is nuanced, ask them to explain it and you’ll get explanations.

I understand being Anti-US, but if Russia was in the US’s position, they would be just as bad if not worse for the treatment of people and propagating imperialism.

This is 100% correct, the thing is, nobody but the US is in the US’s position. Russia is acting in the manner they are because they aren’t.

JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl on 08 Sep 19:49 collapse

hexbear.net/post/3025711

hexbear.net/post/3379624

hexbear.net/comment/5253718 top comment, massively upvoted

hexbear.net/post/3232536 - more “all Ukrainians are Nazi rhetoric”

hexbear.net/comment/4594619 - more “the war is just a local conflict with everyone on Russia’s side” propaganda that is heavily upvoted. Objectively false. There is way way more nuance than that.

hexbear.net/post/3394475 - Russia never does anything wrong. It is just Americans who of course blame it on Russia

hexbear.net/comment/5113469 - Russia never does anything wrong. It is actually a conspiracy that Americans did it

hexbear.net/comment/5084604 - Russia can do no wrong. Russia is destined to win and take the lands they want to annex

hexbear.net/comment/5084494 - yet more Ukraine genocide rhetoric, straight from Russian propaganda

lemmygrad.ml/post/4112194 - literally regurgitating unsubstantiated Russian propaganda. Literally one person saying “if you just blindly believed Russian propaganda 100% of the time, you would be right 70% of the time”

hexbear.net/post/2763869 - “Russia is extremely generous with these terms”, they only have to give up their land to glorious leader of Russia

imperialism /ĭm-pîr′ē-ə-lĭz″əm/ noun

  • The extension of a nation’s authority by territorial acquisition or by the establishment of economic and political dominance over other nations.

  • A political doctrine or system promoting such extension of authority.

  • The power or character of an emperor; imperial authority; the spirit of empire.

Literally exactly the definition of Putin’s post-socialism authoritarian Russia…

Like “the enemy of my enemy” can only take you so far. Like when Putin blatantly poisoned a political opponent and everyone on hexbear was cheering them and saying “I’m surprised it took them this long”… Supporting a murderous regime because they happen to be against an exploitative corrupt regime doesn’t even seem like a valid solution to me.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 20:35 collapse

Again, you are not reading the links, nor are you interested in engaging in good faith. As an example:

hexbear.net/post/3232536 - more “all Ukrainians are Nazi rhetoric”

The comment was mocking the “no Ukranians are Nazis” rhetoric on a video of Ukranian soldiers with Nazi symbols on their helmets harassing an elderly Russian man. You aren’t interested in truth, but debate-broing.

As for your definition of Imperialism, I quite specifically linked Lenin’s work on Imperialism as a stage of Capitalism, not merely invasion, yet you obscure that and push the dictionary definiton, again as a measure of bad-faith. Marxists specifically refer to international Monopoly Capitalism as Imperialism, something the Parenti video I linked you touches on well enough to give you a sufficient taste of Lenin’s Imperialism so you don’t have to read the book for this conversation, yet you twist words and pretend Hexbear is operating on a double standard by using the dictionary definition against a forum of Marxists using Lenin’s definition!

It’s peak dishonesty, your other links are similarly dishonest readings out of context, hoping people won’t actually click the link and see what they really said.

If you aren’t going to engage honestly, you need to logout and touch grass.

lvxferre@mander.xyz on 08 Sep 14:16 collapse

I don’t know for sure. I’ll voice a strong belief in this regard, but take it with a grain of salt.

I think that Hexbear’s views on Russia is a specific case of a general tendency that you see all across social media (not just HB or Lemmy): to dichotomise complex matters into exactly one good side and exactly one bad side, while assuming that everyone belongs to those two bags. It should go like:

  1. NATO bad.
  2. NATO fights Russia.
  3. Criticism against Russia assumed to be NATO support.
  4. Since NATO bad, NATO supporter bad.
  5. Anyone who would otherwise criticise both NATO and Russia gets screeched at, and eventually shuts up.
  6. “Russia good” becomes part of a local consensus.

It gets messier when you add Ukraine into the equation, or consider people conflating governments and populations, but it should give you an idea - it starts with somewhat sane premises but quickly devolves into insane lack of logic.

It explains nicely why they’re supporting Palestine, even with the apparent contradiction: Israel is associated with USA and thus with NATO.

IMO their dichotomy in this topic is idiotic. However it is not just from their part, and blaming specifically Hexbear for this, like some people would do, would be unjust (and a self-demonstrating example). We, people using the internet in the 20s, are collectively doing it.

By the way, you see another example of the general phenomenon in this comment chain. Ctrl+F “elephant shit” and look at the comment I was replying to - “you either treat two types of bad as the same, or you’re defending one.”

[Now I probably drew the ire of all sides at the same time. Frankly? I don’t give a fuck; I’m too old and grumpy to play along.]

HelixDab2@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 17:15 collapse

Most antifa groups are anarchist collectives. So I’m not sure where you’re seeing this, unless it’s solely from people that are terminally online.

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 04:01 collapse

Organized anti-fascist groups often have a mix of left ideological backgrounds, but are mostly anarchists and communists. We work together when it comes to physical defense, barricades, etc.

e.g. many people in black bloc are Maoists even though outsiders tend to assume they are all anarchists.

archomrade@midwest.social on 06 Sep 20:53 next collapse

This is the most reasonable response.

A lot of people here have long since made up their mind about hexbear based both on repeated meta posting on the topic and possibly a bad experience or two with them on a topic they assumed was uncontested but is a landmine topic for communists of a particular bent

I’ve personally never had a bad experience with hexbears, possibly because I’m more empathetic to their perspective, but more likely because I know when it’s time to disengage. There are users on lemmy who feel strongly about a certain topic that’s abrasive to hexbear users and dig in their heels when jeered at (or maybe feel a personal responsibility to stand them down) and are usually the users here who have the most complaints, because the standard reaction from hexbear users is irreverence (both the users and the mods).

Unlike a lot of liberals coming from reddit, communists often don’t have delusions about the neutrality of moderation and so they’ll ban you on a whim if they think you’re there to stir shit. They use the ban hammer judiciously even with users on their own instance. That’s often the biggest complaint both with hexbear and with lemmy.ml.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 05:12 next collapse

Unlike a lot of liberals coming from reddit, communists often don’t have delusions about the neutrality of moderation and so they’ll ban you on a whim if they think you’re there to stir shit.

really well articulated. I feel bad for well meaning people, but so often they don’t realize it comes across as the exact same kind of bad faith trolling that communist online groups have to constantly deal with and so mods and users have little patience for it if it’s not explicitly a thread for that kind of conversation.

lvxferre@mander.xyz on 07 Sep 12:08 collapse

To be fair I’ve had a few bad experiences with Hexbears, but I think that most of them boil down to “unfunny guy interacting with unserious kids”. But since I’m often lurking there in my political account, I feel like my opinion about them is a bit less ungrounded than this whole “Hexbear bad! EDIT WOW THANKS FOR THE GOLD KIND STRANGER!” echo chamber.

(I also have a few bones to pick with .ml [the people in charge, not the whole instance], but they don’t apply to LG or HB, it’s a matter of transparency.)

archomrade@midwest.social on 08 Sep 14:06 collapse

Browsing their coms can be a pretty unique experience, especially if you go in with a preformed idea of what their communities are like. There’s a huge spread of interests and experiences, and sometimes you can be browsing a niche community and forget that these were the people posting BPB on lemmy.world threads a year ago.

Knowing the academic writings and history they’re referencing helps a lot with understanding where they are coming from, even if you may not agree with all of it.

Pandantic@midwest.social on 07 Sep 01:11 next collapse

Thank you for saying this in a more detailed way than I have been. This is exactly right. They built their own leftist haven and became a whole culture of their own, and then became federated. There is bound to be an initial clash, but honestly I think most of the people who hate on them never gave them a chance. All they saw were the shitposts and the in-jokes and you closed the door.

When it comes to dealing with HB users here, my advice is the exact same as dealing with other users

  • if you don’t like what someone is saying (because it’s idiotic, obstrusive, or whatever), block the person for some peace of mind.

  • if you’re consistently uninterested on the content coming from an instance, block the instance.

I see a lot of leftists (and leaning leftists), even on .world, who would be better off interacting with the users there (maybe blocking the shitposting comms). And outside of those most-seen comms (chapotraphouse and dunk_tank), there is genuine conversation and less shit talking and in-jokes. I believe, with more instances coming in that are federated with them (mine, .ml, and lem.ee? are a couple), some of the Hex-natives are understanding how to interact with curious left-leaning people with unintentionally wrong-headed ideas.

Downvote me all you want, I stand by Hexbear. o7

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 05:10 next collapse

I’m curious about this, do you hold the same opinion about lemmygrad?

Pandantic@midwest.social on 07 Sep 15:22 collapse

That is one of the few instances my instance is defederated from, so I haven’t had much interaction with them. I can speak about Hexbear because I see their posts and interact with them.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 15:52 next collapse

well, views are pretty much the same. typically, grad users shitpost less and are less active as a whole but are more sectatarian because the rules of the instance allow for it, although there really isn’t that much sectarianism on there, the comm with the most sectatarinsm “shitultrassay” has only 20 posts in the last six months, whereas the equivalent comm for dunking on social and conservative liberals has over 100 posts in the last month alone

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 20:13 collapse

Lemmygrad.ml is a “serious” community of Marxist-Leninists, and are Dengists as well (or at least largely sympathetic towards Deng).

Hexbear is Left-Unity, and more of a community focused instance.

The views are largely similar, but the tone and goals of each instance are different.

expr@programming.dev on 07 Sep 12:40 collapse

Answer me this: are they or are they not consistently in support of Russia/China? Because I’ve seen it a lot from them (and blocked the instance soon after joining Lemmy when I noticed the pattern).

Is it just some big joke that went over my head?

mamotromico@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 13:33 next collapse

With China, mostly yes. With Russia, only in very specific contexts, otherwise they are VERY critical of it (as they are with most burgeois government, but particularly more due to the reactionary nature of the Russian government from what I’ve seen).

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 13:37 collapse

Support for PRC? Yes.

Support for the Russian Federation? Purely the anti-NATO role it takes, Hexbear hates Putin and the reactionary nature of the Russian Federation.

Klear@sh.itjust.works on 07 Sep 02:13 collapse

Interestingly those points all applied to The_Donald as well.

Pili@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 09:58 next collapse

Ah yes, famously communist, antifa, vegan, anti-cop the_donald.

lvxferre@mander.xyz on 07 Sep 11:50 collapse

I think that this is a red herring.

Even if the first two points apply (do they? I don’t think so, but I’m not going to dispute it*), the problem with T_D was neither, it was users there actively promoting hate against marginalised groups.

And, while you can complain a thousand things about Hexbear, they are not promoting hate against marginalised groups. On the contrary - if they even smell that you might be potentially promoting it, they’ll ban you under a “better safe than sorry” approach.

*reason: I don’t care about USA internal politics.

stepan@lemmy.cafe on 06 Sep 14:15 next collapse

The reason I moved to lemmy.cafe instance is because it’s defederated from those tankie instances. I can’t even see their comments anywhere.

Allero@lemmy.today on 08 Sep 13:51 collapse

The reason I moved to lemmy.today is that admins don’t decide for you what you’re allowed to see.

Everything is open, and if you don’t like it - you defederate personally. No one stops you.

MrQuallzin@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 14:16 next collapse

This is a great thread for finding new people to block

ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 14:26 next collapse

Thank god for hexbear and lemmygrad though. Imagine the effort needed to block them all individually if spread over all the other instances.

samus12345@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 16:48 next collapse

Yeah, it’s actually helpful to have safe spaces for hateful assholes so they can be corralled away.

Steve@startrek.website on 06 Sep 17:40 next collapse

Its a safe space for them to be… away from me

InternetUser2012@lemmy.today on 06 Sep 22:18 next collapse

They still get loose and troll .world while the mods there give them free reign and ban you if you report them for trolling. You can’t call them trolls, but they can call you a troll.

mke@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 08:30 collapse

On the other hand, an isolated community can also become a nasty brewing pot, reinforcing harmful behaviors and even intensifying them over time.

I don’t think calling them safe spaces for hateful assholes is accurate, but I understand frustrations with them.

YeetPics@mander.xyz on 06 Sep 18:57 next collapse

If you think yogthos isn’t the main account of return2ozma you’re gonna have a bad time.

InternetUser2012@lemmy.today on 06 Sep 22:19 next collapse

fuck that guy.

imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one on 07 Sep 01:48 collapse

Really? Damn that’s crazy.

lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com on 07 Sep 11:09 next collapse

lemmygrad? Oh, I missed that one.

OpenStars@discuss.online on 07 Sep 17:02 collapse

Most instances have already blocked lemmygrad. Yours is one of a very few that has not.

Trainguyrom@reddthat.com on 07 Sep 13:08 collapse

Before instance blocking was a thing I blocked individual trolls wheb I saw them and after about the fifth block I didn’t see a lot of hexbear, so it they have a few very loud individuals but instance blocking hexbear really made my browsing a lot more chill

Objection@lemmy.ml on 06 Sep 15:16 next collapse

If you say something wrong about something they care about and you can’t back it up, they’re going to be rude to you.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 15:35 collapse

The one dude I spoke that was decent and respectful asked for proof of the Uygher genocide, gave him proof, the proof wasn’t good enough. Gave him more proof told me it still wasn’t good enough. Figured it wasn’t worth it anymore because he’s denying everything I give him. Told him he has a movable goal post and peace be with him. Blocked the community and just found out today they banned me. There probably are people that willing to have a dialog, but the few are giving all a bad rep

Objection@lemmy.ml on 06 Sep 15:52 next collapse

Do you have a link to that conversation? I’m interested in what your proof looked like.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 15:56 next collapse

Afraid not. I’m banned from that community now, but here are the links

theguardian.com/…/china-is-committing-a-genocide-…

vox.com/…/china-uyghur-muslim-genocide-xinjiang-u…

www.globalr2p.org/countries/china/

thediplomat.com/…/erasing-memories-concealing-evi…

genocidewatch.com/…/chinese-genocide-of-uyghurs-i…

hrw.org/…/chinas-crimes-against-humanity-targetin…

…gwu.edu/…/chinas-genocide-against-uyghurs/

foreignpolicy.com/…/uyghur-genocide-nury-turkel-i…

Objection@lemmy.ml on 06 Sep 16:17 collapse

I found the thread and you had several people read your links and go through them in detail. Most of what they’re claiming is traced back to crackpot Adrian Zenz.

As I said, if you go there and say wrong things and then can’t back them up, they’re going to be rude to you. Citing Adrian Zenz is one form of not being able to back up your claims.

[deleted] on 06 Sep 16:33 collapse
.
Objection@lemmy.ml on 06 Sep 16:43 collapse

genocidewatch.com/…/chinese-genocide-of-uyghurs-i…

According to Adrian Zenz,

thediplomat.com/…/erasing-memories-concealing-evi…

provided to UHRP by scholar Adrian Zenz

Whoopsie! That’s already two. It was easy to find those because they were already pointed out to you (along with several other of your sources) in the thread that you’re complaining about.

Here’s a tip - when you post a source on this subject, press “Ctrl+F” then type “Zenz,” and if anything comes up, don’t post it. Obviously, I can’t expect anyone to actually read their sources before posting them, but is 6 keystrokes really too much to ask?

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 08 Sep 10:21 collapse

wtf is a zenz?

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 15:16 next collapse

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrian_Zenz

Most of the claims of genocide originate with him just making shit up. It’s bizarre how many news articles either cite him directly or various groups that he’s headed.

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 08 Sep 20:44 collapse

i thibk Uyghurs being in guatonomo is another source, because why would they leave their homeland secretly?

ee_pewgar@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 20:49 next collapse

*think, i think lemmy.blahaj.zone just went down after i sent that.

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 21:04 collapse

Anyone in Guantanamo is not a credible source when it comes to things the US wants to believe. See WMDs in Iraq.

why would they leave their homeland secretly?

What do you mean secretly? Chinese people don’t have to sneak out of China.

I can’t recommend any books on development of terrorism in Xinjiang if you want to know more, maybe ask in /c/History.

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 09 Sep 04:43 collapse

💀real

Objection@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 16:22 collapse

A crackpot who is connected to the CIA and a known source of misinformation and fake news.

mathemachristian@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 16:25 collapse

Here it is hexbear.net/post/3384251/5347245

Objection@lemmy.ml on 06 Sep 16:29 collapse

I have a rule that anytime anyone says something happened on the fediverse without providing a link, they are lying or mischaracterizing it literally 100% of the time, and that rule has proven itself yet again.

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 06:12 collapse

Based on the link another user had to provide, you received a lengthy criticism of your logic and sources and then didn’t handle it well.

Now you are here calling them crazy.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 12:09 collapse

I think I handled very well. The one person continued to refuse my assignment, so I left before OP, and I was going to get at each other’s throats. I got nothing at all against OP because they were cool. I’m pretty sure I said that 100 times by now. It was everyone else that was the problem.

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 15:58 collapse

I think I handled very well.

One user asked you to provide any source material since 2022. As an answer, you provided (seemingly) 3 links, none of which were source material for the claim since 2022.

When this was pointed out, rather than engage with these failures, you just posted 5 links.

A different user replied to you to point out that all of the sourcing in those articles goes back to a particularly absurd fraud named Adrian Zenz. I’ll add that the sourcing is also pre-2022, but the user responding to you wrote several paragraphs critical of Zenz and why you should be skeptical. You did not respond to this person at all despite replying to others later.

The user from before responded by immediately pointing out that your links, yet again, did not include sourcing since 2022. They then went through each link to explained how this was the case.

Your response to this: “I did learn something. You have a movable goal post. On that note, I’m out. Peace be with you”. That’s it. That’s all you wrote.

What I just described is you displaying a series of bad faith behaviors. And then you came over here to complain Lmao.

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 22:03 collapse

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/ffe4d0d0-c7b3-41f5-86cd-16a3f892417e.webp"> for the both of you

davel@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 23:26 next collapse

Is this photo supposed to mean something to someone? Because it doesn’t mean anything to me or TinEye. No idea who that guy is.

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 01:10 collapse

?

the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works on 06 Sep 15:17 next collapse

I think anyone who’s even remotely curious about hexbear should go make an account and just… Iunno, check it out? That’s what i did and it ended up being my home away from home.

Their viewpoints are gonna be absolute whiplash for most people unaccustomed to speaking about world topics from a non-us-centric perspective, or who have only learned about what communism actually is from our (definitely not biased) general education.

Calling those viewpoints “crazy” is just a shortcut, a base dismissal of thought unworthy of critical thinkers.

If you take me up on this, go lurk a bit! They can’t hurt you. If after awhile of lurking, you have a question (you will have questions) ask them from a position of curiosity that you’re interested in their perspective instead of one there to “educate the commies” and you’ll be just fine. Hell you don’t ever have to engage in politics at all there, hexbear has as many shitposts as the other instances do

I recall i went to hexbear because sh.itjust.works was defedding and erryone was just so mad at them i had to see what the fuss was about. Im very glad i did

Kecessa@sh.itjust.works on 06 Sep 15:37 next collapse

You can have a non-US centric point of view without defending Russia or Chinese genocides…

vritrahan@lemmy.zip on 06 Sep 15:48 collapse

Difficult. The perception of Russia and China outside the western world is very different and very variable than what westerners think.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 15:38 collapse

If you’re saying I’m calling their viewpoints crazy, I’m not. I didn’t get a view point besides I’m pig slop, a piece of shit, brainwashed by the empire (whatever the hell that means), stupid, a basement dweller, and today, I think they called me a pervert

the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works on 06 Sep 15:50 next collapse

So this post is because you’re angry ya got dunked on? You can’t just post liberal political opinions (that would do well in liberal spaces) and expect them to fly in a commie space…

Wait, i recognize you! Ive argued with you myself! You definitely don’t approach hexbear with a perspective of learning something, and iirc you’re not the most respectful of other opinions haha! You been banned a couple times and still ain’t learned shit about shit. Should i pm you with those threads with explanations of what and where you went wrong? Id be ecstatic to teach you something today

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 16:05 collapse

I’ve said it multiple times. If I get talked to respectfully, I talk respectfully. If someone is a smartass, I’m a smartass. OP of the post yesterday was respectful so I had a conversation with him while everyone was telling me how big of pile of shit I am. I know why I got banned. You don’t have to send me anything. And I guess I’m up to 3 communities now because I said the same exact thing this morning. Someone calls me pig shit and I’m supposed to just be like “Hey. I’m here to learn”. No. Sorry. Not how I operate

But I will say our arguments must have went well because you aren’t on my ban list lol. So I’ll keep up with the theme of talking to you respectfully

Edit: And I’m not angry at all. It started out as a legitimate question of if I’m the problem on HB, and then are started reading experiences from other people, but I blocked the instance so neither of us have to worry about it. If you choose not to respond, I hope you have a good weekend

the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works on 06 Sep 16:18 collapse

I don’t block people permanently, only for a couple days and then only if they won’t stop barkin. We didn’t have any discussions per se but i have to admit to you it was i who reported one of your comments as “debate pervert”. I stand behind that decision too, in that particular case.

I hope you have a good weekend too. I hope you come back around one day, as a lurker, with curiosity. Even if it seems unlikely in the face of the other things I’ve said, i really mean that.

mathemachristian@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 16:23 next collapse

again youre misrepresenting. you got several well articulated lengthy explanations and dismissed them or didn’t reply.

  1. hexbear.net/post/3384251/5347496
  2. hexbear.net/post/3384251/5347177
  3. hexbear.net/post/3384251/5347490
m_f@midwest.social on 06 Sep 19:19 collapse

Those aren’t good responses. The narrative of “poor Putin just had to invade Ukraine, don’t you see?” is bollocks.

Their weird insistence that anyone that doesn’t agree with them is a “lib” that needs “dunking on” is tiring. If you don’t show full-throated support for authoritarian regimes that they happen to like, then you clearly support Israel and genocide. They need to mature a bit, and realize that the world isn’t black and white, and it doesn’t neatly fall into convenient categories that can be nicely labelled.

mathemachristian@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 20:23 collapse

Except these replies are made to illustrate the viewpoints held by the commenters and not meant to be dunks. Rather obviously imo. Yet OP is claiming he only got called mean words and no one explained to them why they think what they think.

There absolutely were good faith explanations but OP didn’t engage with any of them in kind but chose to keep replying to the dunks instead.

Sharkwellington@lemmy.one on 06 Sep 17:24 next collapse

This is my exact same experience. I ask for someone to elaborate on their stance, get told (not accused, told) I’m trolling. Ask for explanation/definition of a concept, get called an idiot shitlib and told to read some theory. Ask for civility, get told I deserve abuse for “endorsing genocide”. (By the way, I absolutely oppose the genocide in Gaza. But I’m a genocide supporter I guess because I won’t flush my vote third party this November.)

Hexbear is a community that expects you to conform. Every time there is a post like this, someone comes out of the woodwork and says “They’re nice people if you talk like them and agree with them on everything.” It’s cool that you’re not getting abused, but abuse is coming from that space, whether or not it is happening to you.

It’s a shame because I would like to hear the nuances of their viewpoints, but I can never get them to tell me what they are. Always complaining that nobody tries to understand, but dogpiling on anyone that asks questions. Then they pull up your report history and tell you “It’s just a little dunking bro, stop being a snowflake” for not putting up with it.

Users of Hexbear, if you’re reading these words, do better. Nobody is going to sympathize with your cause if you antagonize outsiders that want to learn more.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 17:36 next collapse

Well put. To be fair, there’s people that disagree with them that would ridicule them too. Everyone just expects people to be shitty. My opinion is we need to change the atmosphere altogether, but I can only control my own actions.

With that being said, I am guilty of a “gotcha” move to test the waters. I didn’t necessarily see it as disrespectful in the moment because the whole post was “Libs bad! Get the torches”.

I want to keep saying though that OP of the post was absolutely respectful, but our discussion just degraded because he kept refusing the sources I presented and it just went to shit after that. I even explained my comment to OP and apologized to them if I offended them with my comment.

But everyone else just proved that they’re garbage people that just want to treat everyone like shit and not try to educate or learn.

And now I guess people who often posts like that on HB are losing their mind because I’m criticizing them in a way lesser way they were criticizing me. I don’t get it lol

OpenStars@discuss.online on 06 Sep 18:10 next collapse

VERY well-stated, imho. I nominated your comment to !BestOfLemmy@lemmy.world.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 05:36 next collapse

I’m a grad user not a hexbear user but views are pretty much the same, I’ll say here: it matters a ton in the thread and way in which you tried to do this. if you give the slightest hint that you’re asking questions in bad faith, they’re going to pounce on you, because communists online constantly have to deal with bad faith trolls. There are an extremely small number of communists in the west, we are outnumbered basically everywhere online and in real life, so we are naturally protective of the very few places where we hold the majority opinion.

I’m not gonna go looking for your interactions with hexbear to actually see but I’ll answer any questions you have right now. also, you haven’t been banned or had any action taken against you by hexbear mods at all. you could always pose respectful questions in one of their general mega threads, or in ask chapo

Sharkwellington@lemmy.one on 07 Sep 07:55 collapse

I’ll read through those threads sometime. I don’t think I’ll be commenting in that instance though. Maybe I’ll look around for a community that clicks better to interact with. I don’t really have questions off the top of my head, sorry. I don’t know what I don’t know.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 08:03 collapse

nah sorry the general megathreads are mostly just people randomly commenting about their day and what not, I just meant you can just go in there and ask for someone willing to talk about some topic. Like, just say “I am a visiting liberal and would like to discuss XYZ that I don’t understand” and if someone responds you can go into detail about what you want to discuss. lemmygrad has a communism 101 comm that has heightened civility rules but your instance is defederated from grad.

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 06:05 next collapse

Voting for the people doing genocide does make you complicit. Feeling that the genocide is bad is limited to your mind, it is of no use to the dead and dying children. You do actually have to do something about it if you think genocide is something to be opposed.

If this is your idea of hexbears being crazy or wrong, you picked possibly the worst example you could. Though I am sure it resonates with many others who want to feel good about their complicity.

Sharkwellington@lemmy.one on 07 Sep 07:42 collapse

Ok.

emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de on 07 Sep 06:11 collapse

This is such a bad faith comment. Im not a hexbear user but my instance is federated with them and ive interacted with lots of their posts. Go into any post on hexbear and youll see tons of examples of them disagreeing WITH EACHOTHER. they commonly have huge arguments in the comments and as long as everyone is civil and not arguing in bad faith noone gets banned and noone gets urt feelings. Stop lying and using hexbear as the lemmy boogeyman because its a bad look.

Sharkwellington@lemmy.one on 07 Sep 07:45 collapse

“People I don’t agree with are lying in bad faith.”

I have no interest in talking to you.

LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 17:58 collapse

Your mistake was posting in the dunk tank. That is literally a “vent” sub where they vent their frustrations against stupid US empire propaganda takes.

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

If you go there expecting reasonable treatment for your opinions, you misunderstood the assignment. That is a shitpost sub where only one side is right.

How do I know this? Because I went there once and got dunked on too! But that does not represent the entirety of hexbear. I think.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 18:02 collapse

Then I think I made the same mistake that you did. However I took a shot and dunked on them, and they went insane. Like water in a fryer

LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 18:07 collapse

Yeah well lol, it’s sort of like a “roast me” sub for liberals.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 18:16 collapse

Tbf, they’d probably get the same responses from people who disagree with them. We as internet forum users need to change the environment so everyone can be included. However that would mean we as a whole have to agree what all-inclusive is

Maeve@kbin.earth on 06 Sep 20:19 collapse

Let's start a movement, friend.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 20:40 collapse

I’m down. I vote everyone starts to talk to people friendly and respectfully until you encounter people that are disrespectful for no reason

Maeve@kbin.earth on 06 Sep 20:44 collapse

Oh that's not what I meant. I mean talk to them friendly and respectfully anyway.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 21:01 collapse

I mean… IMO. I’ll be a smartass to people that are a smartass to, but I’d never wish bad vibes or times their way. Bad times suck and I’d never wish that however they talk to me. Hate takes too much mental energy that no one should extend

Maeve@kbin.earth on 06 Sep 21:18 collapse

A single step is better than sitting in our own ish then complaining about the smell. We'll get there, with consistency and self-honesty.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 21:26 collapse

But does someone living in the sewer complain about the smell?

zante@lemmy.wtf on 06 Sep 15:21 next collapse

Safe space for teens cos playing as communists, where they can be nasty to outsiders.

I like the politics, but it’s filled with truly obnoxious children try to out-communist each other

the philosopher Bertrand Russell warned of the dangers of communisms tendency to become a religious cult and he was right.

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 03:56 collapse

Bertrand Russell’s Political understanding was poor to say the least. He was in no way an expert and seemed to have only skimmed summaries and a handful of short texts when it came to Marx, sounding more like Jordan Peterson fixating on terms. For example, I think at one point he spent several paragraphs fixated on “nothing to lose but our chains” without understanding the basic thesis. His criticisms were, therefore, basically a series of errors and misunderstandings rather than insight. And beneath it all, a distressingly consistent current of chauvinism and racism, even with his anti-war stance.

Russell is good for math, logic, and some analytic philosophy, though.

PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 15:29 next collapse

I was bullied for off Lemmy.One by the hexbear mods who sent hexbear users my way to harass me…

All for (while I’m still a raging communist) not being a pro authoritarian communist.

Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 15:32 next collapse

That’s kind of just socialism then.

Edit. Misread op comment.

PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 15:39 next collapse

No, I find socialism and markets to be a capitalist compromise that still breeds wasteful middlemen. More regulated middlemen, but still. Communism is an economic framework, not a governmental one.

For sure socialism is a step up from cpaitalism, but I don’t think it’s enough.

Zyansheep@programming.dev on 07 Sep 00:45 collapse

I’ve never heard of communism being an economic framework before, I thought it just meant a system without capitalism or a state. Do you have something short I could read about communism being an economic framework?

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 12:37 collapse

Assuming you’re genuinely asking, Communism isn’t so much a “status” as it is a strategy for reaching the famous “Stateless, Classless, Moneyless society” it is often shorthanded as. It involves smashing the existing state, and replacing it with a state-as-non-state, ie a form designed to wither away once global class antagonisms are made redundant.

Economically, it is centered around collectivization of the Means of Production, Centralization, and Central Planning.

That sounds like nonsense without reading theory, unfortunately, but if you want something short, Marx’s Critique of the Gotha Programme goes over what a transition to Communism may look like. Lenin’s The State and Revolution also goes over what that looks like, it’s roughly a quarter Marx and Engels quotes and he analyzes how Marx and Engels changed their views after the Paris Commune, and how this change was obscured by Reformists and Opportunists like Kautsky of the Second International.

Smokeless7048@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 16:20 next collapse

Thats… kind of the opposite of socialism. Socialism, at least the ideal form, is when the ‘workers hold the means of production’, with no figure heads. This is closer to authoritarianism, with a charismatic leader commanding people to do things.

PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 16:28 collapse

See this just reads as a complete misunderstanding of what communism is. The word Communism is derived from the word Commune, in which there is traditionally no standard power structure. Too much red scare propaganda. To me of the most prevalent feelings of authoritarianism in my life has been the boss/underling dynamic in the workplace under capitalism.

I’m pro communist economics and pro democratic governance. There is a reason the movement here in the US is towards “democratic socialism”, because they are two separate facets of a country. The governance (democratic) and the economic (socialism).

I’m a democratic Communist

Smokeless7048@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 16:42 next collapse

I’m not sure if you are saying what i said (that someone in charge sending his minions to harass someone is closer to authoritarianism), or him is a misunderstanding of communism.

I definitely should have used the word “communism” in my sentence, but since he used socialism, I didn’t want to change the subject from socialism to communism.

Being from Canada, and a huge proponent of social services and crown corporations, I’m definitely a socialist myself.

PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 16:46 collapse

I think there was a misunderstanding based on the context of the post above? Sorry. I thought you were talking about my views as being authoritarian.

Edit: dumb voice to text software

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 06 Sep 18:13 collapse

Nothing you’ve said seems objectionable, I can’t imagine what set them off.

Do you consider the party apparatus of say, Cuba, where every position is elected and has instant recall, and their last constitutional referendum passed with 90%+ approval, to be democratic?

PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 18:32 collapse

I would definitely want more parties in Cuba on the governance side. One party is ripe for abuse. Generally the more the marrier.

Right now I think thier government is too large. Large isn’t necessarily bad, but a government should only IMO be as large as it needs to be to help its population. Of course on a political compass, I’m more on the libertarian end in terms of governance.

I think the economics of Cuba would be better if the US would stop senseless embargo.

Again, ideally we want strong communist economic and social fabric AND a thriving democracy to pick leadership. I think they are struggling on the latter.

Of course my perspective is the strict embargos are in place solely because the US really doesn’t want communism to work. If it worked somewhere, then it makes US capitalism look quite bad.

BlucifersVeinyAnus@sh.itjust.works on 06 Sep 20:25 collapse

If you don’t understand socialism, sure.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 15:39 next collapse

That’s called harrasment and possibly borderline stalking

PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 15:44 collapse

Indeed

bradorsomething@ttrpg.network on 07 Sep 00:17 collapse

At least you got them all working together for a common cause. I mean, it’s a start.

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 04:27 collapse

Harassed how? Do you have a link?

FireTower@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 16:32 next collapse

Last I checked there was an instance rule preventing the posting of pictures of cheese without a trigger warning.

samus12345@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 16:47 next collapse

Sheogorath does not approve.

<img alt="" src="https://i.redd.it/xem5s0wgvsja1.jpg">

SassyRamen@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 17:29 collapse

The most well written character from any game yet. Change my mind.

bdonvr@thelemmy.club on 07 Sep 12:38 next collapse

I’m pretty sure it’s food in general as a courtesy to persons who struggle with eating disorders.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 13:27 collapse

It’s for meat and dairy, Hexbear allows non-vegan members and non-vegan posting, but requires CWs.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 12:58 collapse

Hexbear is firmly Vegan ideologically, you can still post meat or dairy behind CWs.

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 22:01 collapse

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/f0875321-2e88-4666-916f-c6499512ff73.webp"> we don’t need a fake veganism instance mr tankie

burgersc12@mander.xyz on 06 Sep 16:56 next collapse

Obviously you can’t lump them all into one category, but the majority of them seem to be willing to cause chaos on other instances for a laugh. Doesn’t sit right with me, so i blocked them

fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 20:25 collapse

cause chaos for a laugh spread harmful propaganda from violent dictators for money

Aabbcc@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 21:39 collapse

Everyone I disagree with is a paid propagandist

nomous@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 22:30 next collapse

Paid propagandist, true believer, troll. I’m not sure it makes that much difference.

Honytawk@lemmy.zip on 07 Sep 09:12 collapse

Whether they are paid or not we don’t know, but they are spreading propaganda so they are definitely propagandists.

tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip on 06 Sep 17:51 next collapse

Check out !meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 18:00 collapse

Jesus Harold Christ. This is just propaganda. Plain and simple

m_f@midwest.social on 06 Sep 18:40 next collapse

It’s not just you. Like many people that get sucked into cults, you don’t want to directly engage with them. Just nicely encourage them to deprogram themselves, and focus on maturing and becoming an adult. They really don’t like get called out like that, based on my interactions with them.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 05:03 next collapse

They really don’t like get called out like that, based on my interactions with them.

yes why would people get upset that you’re being condescending and calling them either brainwashed or a child? one of the biggest remaining mysteries in the world really

m_f@midwest.social on 07 Sep 18:26 collapse

So here’s the thing. Hexbear has some smart people on it. @PugJesus@lemmy.world wrote a good comment over here that talks about how it’s good that they can see injustices in the world and get pissed off: lemmy.world/comment/12220633

But cults suck in smart people, and they’re very skilled at this. They feed off of righteous anger at the state of the world, and promise neat, easy solutions. And the issue is that you can’t reason someone out of a position they didn’t reason themselves into, especially people that suffer from black and white thinking. You can’t talk about how the world doesn’t neatly fit into tidy categories, because that’s not as comforting as what the cult offers. The only thing you can really do is reinforce that they’ve fallen into a broken system of thinking, and encourage them to want to reason themselves out of their current position. Once that desire is there, they’ll accomplish it all on their own.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 18:38 collapse

They feed off of righteous anger at the state of the world, and promise neat, easy solutions

communists don’t think there are “neat, easy solutions” this is fundamentally a misunderstanding of our positions. this is the entire point behind why people constantly accuse tankies of being bootlickers and what not: we think transforming the world will be hard, and will involve making harder decisions than me you or anyone else on this website has ever or probably will ever have to make, and that mistakes that socialist states make in these circumstances are entirely understandable even though they are tragic. Of course, socialist states are evil or something which is totally not black and white thinking by your side, of course. America’s enemies are totally doing worse things than america does which has very nuanced and reasonable reasons for overthrowing democratically elected socialist leaders or invading countries and killing millions of people to stop communism or even just general anti-colonial governments and replacing them with fascists and socialists and other anti-imperialists are evil barbarians with no nuanced reasons to try to use whatever methods they can to stop them. why am i arguing with such an obviously bad faith person what is wrong with me

m_f@midwest.social on 07 Sep 18:47 collapse

The easiness of the solution isn’t how much work is involved. By “neat and easy” I mean, “The root of all evil is capitalism and we solve that with revolution”.

Black and white thinking pops up again. Why do you think I think socialist states are evil? Why do you think I think everything America does is reasonable?

It’s another cult-like behavior that is rampant with tankies. “This person thinks this, so I will assign these other views to them as well, so that I may dunk on them”.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 18:59 next collapse

By “neat and easy” I mean, “The root of all evil is capitalism and we solve that with revolution”.

this isn’t what we believe once again. class society predates capitalism. you know nothing of marxist thought but arrogantly assign beliefs to us, but once again that is not “black and white thinking” on your part. we believe revolution is the solution because we believe that all evidence shows that the bourgousie will not let us take power peacefully, just like the bourgousie were forced to use violence to take power when they were oppressed by the aristocratic class. this is baby baby basic marxism and you don’t even know this and yet you deign to talk down on us? it’s pathetic, truly.

“This person thinks this, so I will assign these other views to them as well, so that I may dunk on them”.

this is a thing literally everyone on the planet does. When you see someone say they think gay people should die, is it unreasonable to presume they are a reactionary conservative and assume they have other wack beliefs? I see you making a smug liberal enlightened centrist argument, and thus I assume you are a smug liberal with similar beliefs. Why would I put the effort into getting your opinion on every single topic. why would you do the same for mine? that’s why you call me a tankie, isn’t it? there is someone I got into a slap fight up with further in the thread that is a liberal and tried to make me mad by saying that putin “fucked male prostitutes”. he assumed I would care because I am a “tankie”. Do I see smug pricks like yourself going around calling his ass a cultist? No!

m_f@midwest.social on 07 Sep 19:16 collapse

we believe revolution is the solution

Yes, that’s the issue.

smug liberal enlightened centrist argument

That’s on you for assuming that just because you don’t like an argument it must be those smug libs.

tankies of being bootlickers and what not: we

I didn’t call you a tankie, you self-identified as one

Do I see smug pricks like yourself going around calling his ass a cultist? No!

I call out silliness when I see it, but most lib stuff that I come across is of the bland, inoffensive variety. I haven’t been checking this entire thread for everyone that’s wrong, I’ve spent enough time on this already.

[deleted] on 07 Sep 19:39 next collapse
.
Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 13:26 collapse

Yes, that’s the issue.

Where along the Marxist theory of the State with respect to Revolution do you begin to disagree? Fundamentally? Is it with certain aspects?

amberSuperMario@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 20:07 collapse

By “neat and easy” I mean, “The root of all evil is capitalism and we solve that with revolution”.

This is exactly why they are responding to you as they are. This is not an accurate summary of the marxist position. You’ve built up a strawman to knock down to justify calling us cultish.

Some basic questions that marxists are concerned with:

  • Why is a revolution necessary to begin with?

  • Who is exploited, and who is the exploiter?

  • What material conditions are necessary for a revolution to be possible?

  • How do you organize society post-revolution?

  • How do you prevent those who oppose the liberation of the proletariat from taking over your post-revolutionary society and destroying it?

  • How do we learn from the successes and the failures of history so that we don’t repeat the same mistakes?

If you don’t understand the marxist position on these questions, yet continue to criticize us, then of course you will come to nonsense conclusions and just piss people off. You’ve made up a guy to represent us and then mock them.

amberSuperMario@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 07:02 collapse

That’s right folks, remember not to engage with any opposing ideology in an honest or intellectually rigorous manner! If someone is critical of your beliefs, it is important to simply ignore them and never seriously consider either of your positions. <img alt="not-listening" src="https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/b1e77672-563f-44bf-b731-d86fca28bd3c.png"> <img alt="i-love-not-thinking" src="https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/c038ae45-5d92-4bfb-b738-b658174670fa.png">

uienia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 08:59 next collapse

It has nothing to do with “opposing ideologies”, it is how you are behaving like toxic assholes 100% of the time.

amberSuperMario@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 09:38 collapse

So when people constantly call us deluded, cult followers, bots, shills, brainwashed, fascists, bigots, trump supporters, and any other number of dehumanizing insults, often coming into our spaces to do so, all the while themselves defending some of the most violent and evil people in history in the name of “lesser evil”, are we supposed to just turn the other cheek and never respond in kind? When we witness the regular defense of the people ensuring the destruction of Palestine continues, are we supposed to just patiently and calmly explain how genocide is bad, actually? When dot worlders accuse me of faking being trans and being a privileged child, am I not justified in losing my temper? Y’all do not even try to understand where we are coming from, constantly use strawman arguments and put words in our mouths, but we’re supposed to smile politely while you spit in our faces? Like this is literally a thread spawning from an OP that is just an ableist insult, and yet some of us are still in here trying to talk things out despite that!

And it’s not like it’s limited to Lemmy, right? Literally everywhere I go I have to either tolerate anti-communist red scare bullshit, transphobia, ableism, misogyny, etc., or I have to try and have stressful and exhausting conversations with people who never, ever take me seriously. So yeah, we’re kind of on edge! If you get shit on for that when it wasn’t deserved, then I’m genuinely sorry, and I wish it wasn’t something that happens. But can you at the least understand that it is not a one-way street here?

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 21:50 collapse

lol, can’t be bothered to read insaneposting. long live the eu

amberSuperMario@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 22:39 collapse

<img alt="shrug-outta-hecks" src="https://www.hexbear.net/pictrs/image/7cc4b291-507e-4aa2-9ba6-35d81eb4a08a.png">

Honytawk@lemmy.zip on 07 Sep 09:14 collapse

Typical lemmy.ml comment, trying to make hexbears seem reasonable when they are definitely arguing in bad faith.

We don’t have to feed trolls. You can’t make us either.

YeetPics@mander.xyz on 06 Sep 18:55 next collapse

Lmao, they sure are insane. But if you listen closely they will tell you that sanity is a western psyop and you should enjoy the simple truths of life, like shitting in your own pants and bragging about it online.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 19:22 next collapse

I got IBS so I guess I already have an advantage in that regard

stoly@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 23:11 collapse

Oh so you have also failed the game of “fart or not?”

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 01:22 collapse

Many a time

PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 07:10 collapse

Just like they claimed NATO had biolabs on the Ukraine / Russian border: it’s all a conspiracy to destroy poor mother Russia!

istanbullu@lemmy.ml on 06 Sep 19:37 next collapse

My experience is that people in lemmy.world are intolerant bigots.

cows_are_underrated@feddit.org on 06 Sep 19:56 next collapse

Average Lemmy.ml comment

cheddar@programming.dev on 06 Sep 20:13 next collapse

Maybe you’re just intolerable.

FlyingSquid@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 20:56 next collapse

And yet your presence is being tolerated.

lvxferre@mander.xyz on 06 Sep 21:13 collapse

My experience with LW users is mixed: some great users, some really trashy users. It’s what you expect from a huge instance not geared towards any specific demographic.

As such I don’t think that it’s sensible to generalise LW users like this.

cheeseburger@lemmy.ca on 06 Sep 20:12 next collapse

containment instance

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 20:38 collapse

What do you mean by that?

cheeseburger@lemmy.ca on 06 Sep 20:56 collapse

On 4chan people refer to “containment” boards for topics that are racist, inflammatory, or regularly derail conversations (ex. pol, b, mlp). That way the people who want that aren’t always polluting boards where people just want to talk about (for example) food or technology.

So I was half joking that hexbear is like a containment board. It isn’t quite the same, but since other Lemmy instances can block hexbear all at once it has the same effect.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 21:06 collapse

That’s an understandable explanation. I’ve never been to 4chan because a person who attended it told me he would kick my 2 year old niece in the face and told me that’s a common belief there. Not flaunting, but I told him that no one would ever find his body if he did that.

So I avoided 4chan because my crazy would probably cause conflict with their crazy

Edit: this was in person btw

Delphia@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 23:10 next collapse

I remember 4chan when it was “good”

Back then 4Chan was all about how funny your content was. Nationality, sexuality, gender, economic status… none of it mattered a bit.

Its a cesspit now, but it was responsible for some truly epic shit.

SolOrion@sh.itjust.works on 07 Sep 01:54 next collapse

I’ve never really been on 4chan for any length, but I remember some of their greatest hits- managing to almost win a contest to name the next mtn dew flavor ‘hitler did nothing wrong’, or that one time they got Taylor Swift to do a show at a school for the deaf.

Kinda edgy, extremely amusing.

Delphia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 02:29 collapse

The “you can microwave your IPhone to recharge it” and “Iphones are waterproof” were amazing.

The Burger King lettuce box doxxing was pretty funny too.

gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 07 Sep 06:31 collapse

the WHAT? lmfao what was that?

Delphia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 06:44 collapse

Waterproof Iphone

Microwave Iphone

Burger King Lettuce

4chan really was hilarious sometimes.

PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 07:29 collapse

When it was good?

I was on 4 Chan 20 years ago and even back then it was full of gore, snuff type photos and CP. It was and always will be a cesspool.

Delphia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 08:16 collapse

Yeah about 20 years ago.

The vibe was different, it was racist, sexist, bigoted and homophobic jokes. Now it feels like a bunch of racists sexists bigots and homophobes telling jokes. Nobody cared about who anyone really was, it was a shittalking shitposting competition. At some point it stopped feeling like bantz, it just started to feel ugly.

Maybe I just grew up a bit, but I at least remember it being that way.

Trainguyrom@reddthat.com on 07 Sep 13:13 collapse

it was racist, sexist, bigoted and homophobic jokes

I feel like the world grew up and accepted that these jokes aren’t funny, but the small subset of people who are actually bigoted ignored the memo. But there is definitely a growing up element to it as well

PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 07:27 collapse

You aren’t missing anything. It’s a cesspool

WatDabney@sopuli.xyz on 06 Sep 20:30 next collapse

Hexbear is sort of like a village of eldritch abomination worshippers in a Lovecraftian horror story - isolated, insular, entirely wrapped up in their own esoteric rituals and ideas and language, and immediately and collectively hostile to outsiders.

nomous@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 22:27 next collapse

Wow, this is such an accurate description of so many online communities that have come and gone over the years, nicely done.

Hadriscus@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 07:19 next collapse

They also both worship Cthu… I mean, Stalin

Saint_La_Croix_Crosse@midwest.social on 07 Sep 11:45 collapse

I always joke that right-wing politics is all projection. But here we are with the cult of capital being dismissive to non-believers

Dark Eucharist of the Real God!

PenisDuckCuck9001@lemmynsfw.com on 06 Sep 20:35 next collapse

I’m on lemmynsfw because I like to argue about how shitty society is between wanks

[deleted] on 06 Sep 20:49 next collapse
.
erev@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 21:05 next collapse

He’s not a troll hes just taking the piss out of you mate lighten up

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 21:11 collapse

Fair enough. Like I said. I could have miunderstood. Sorry. I’m a little bit up in arms today to due some backlash

Pilferjinx@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 21:48 next collapse

It’s all good. It’s hard to gauge intent through text alone sometimes.

bradorsomething@ttrpg.network on 07 Sep 00:10 collapse

Also, someone said hexbear without a trigger warning.

ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net on 06 Sep 21:11 next collapse

They literally explained their backstory.

They rub one out then reply. It’s not rocket science.

[deleted] on 06 Sep 21:13 collapse
.
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works on 06 Sep 23:08 next collapse

Hey, maybe take a deep breath and leave lemmy alone for the rest of the day? Not being sarcastic, you seem to be a little stressed right now

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 01:11 collapse

Sorry. I was getting irritated because I had to repeat myself multiple times while people should have just read my first comment

loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 06 Sep 23:25 collapse

Yeah mate you need to touch grass

[deleted] on 07 Sep 01:08 collapse
.
stoly@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 23:10 next collapse

You don’t deserve to be downvoted. It was an edgy comment and you’re asking a serious question.

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 23:51 collapse

It wasn’t edgy, OP just read into it a ton of stuff that the commenter didn’t ever say or imply.

WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works on 07 Sep 00:27 collapse

it might have been just because OP did not understand what they wanted to mean. I don’t either.

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 02:33 collapse

Not everything has a deeper meaning.

WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works on 07 Sep 12:02 collapse

if this doesn’t, then it doesn’t have any, and people would leave it alone near 0 votes

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 15:34 collapse

That’s just completely nonsensical.

loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 06 Sep 23:24 next collapse

Most hexbear response ever

Pandantic@midwest.social on 07 Sep 01:34 collapse

I agree but I would rather think this is just this guys downtime.

KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 07 Sep 01:56 next collapse

brother its a shitpost, are you hexbear alt? Is this why you’re mad now?

deuleb_biezelbob@programming.dev on 07 Sep 04:18 collapse

English 101 in China

send_me_your_ink@lemmynsfw.com on 06 Sep 21:12 next collapse

Not just to make someone do a double take at your instance?

baseless_discourse@mander.xyz on 07 Sep 04:00 collapse

so you are the degenerate that follow world news on lemmynsfw. I was wondering why are there so many news on the all feeds of my porn account.

send_me_your_ink@lemmynsfw.com on 07 Sep 05:13 collapse

Nah. The porn account follows porn like a normal person.

Someone actually followed world news?

OozingPositron@feddit.cl on 07 Sep 16:48 collapse

Based.

Maeve@kbin.earth on 06 Sep 20:38 next collapse

I first was introduced to hex by a similar post, idk the community, and my first reaction was, "holy shit it, those people are toxic!” maybe it was a complaint about the dunktank. Since then, I've come to recognize how intelligent and sane they actually are.

Abuse begets abuse, and the cycle continues. I do hope my own instance hasn't defederated. I've learned so much, incrementally, and developed a particular fondness for some users. I do feel enriched for them and ml having educated me patiently and kindly. I see them as older siblings who are human, like me. In fact, I'd say there are some I adore. Not hero worship, because that sets is up for disappointment or cult of personality. Just a particular fondness.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 20:58 collapse

Don’t misunderstand, and I wish I knew the OPs tag, but they gave info to research and I quickly adjusted my knowledge to fill in some blanks, but the majority of people were just on the attack. Maybe they needed to vent some stress, which is fine, but there was only less than a handful of people that were giving me a chance. I’d love to discuss opposing views, but if the majority is going to belittle and ridicule me, I’m going to respond in equivalence. Call it pride, but no one person should be treated like that and be convinced to hear an opposing view. It just does not work

Maeve@kbin.earth on 06 Sep 21:19 collapse

With all respect friend, the error had been linked in this thread and explained multiple times. You'll see it when and if you're ready to see it, I suppose. Wishing you the best. Ciao.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 21:24 collapse

No. Not really. I’m pointing out the hypocrisy of political and social discussions from around the world, and people want to act like different perspectives are common sense. If it was common sense, then it would be common knowledge. All that was proven to me is that bias is forever going to be biased, and the world isn’t going to improve social climates because of that bias. Very few people are interested in a dialog on whatever side of the social or political spectrum they’re on. It’s all just a fucking farce, and everyone pays for it

hark@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 21:19 next collapse

Do you have any examples of this? Since world is defederated from that instance, I only end up visiting it when people like you come in and talk about how absolutely crazy it is over there, so occasionally I’ll take a curious peek. This time I see… a post about Indigenous rights, a post criticizing capitalism, a post dunking on musk, a post about FOSS… when do I start seeing the crazy?

Kolanaki@yiffit.net on 06 Sep 21:29 next collapse

Read the comments.

hark@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 21:38 collapse

I did, and still didn’t see the crazy. In fact, all it did was make me wonder why an instance with such little activity gets talked about so much.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 06 Sep 21:47 collapse

I don’t because I blocked the instance. I’d recommend if you’re curious, just take a look at it. I’m probably being more dramatic than necessary, and I know there are some good instances there. Just be careful

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 23:59 next collapse

They very quickly ban people who disagree with their propaganda. So just browsing, it looks like left leaning but generally sane people.

Go on there and say anything negative at all about China. You’ll see the crazy.

hark@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 00:01 next collapse

I might not agree with the moderation practices or even their opinions, but that doesn’t make them crazy.

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 00:14 collapse

You got cause and effect mixed up.

We disagree with them because they are crazy.

TheOubliette@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 03:39 next collapse

lemmy.world users don’t interact with hexbeqr users because your admin preemptively defederated from hexbear “as a last resort”. At no point were the two federated. I don’t know about crazy, but that seems inconsistent. Don’t you agree?

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 04:22 collapse

Found the hexbear with a .ml alt rofl

That’s how we interact with hexbears. Via .ml

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 05:01 collapse

do you have an argument that doesn’t rely on ableism?

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 05:07 collapse

Yeah. Here it goes:

“ableism” is used as cover for shills to attempt to shut down people who call out their batshit insanity.

Oops

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 05:21 collapse

got it. for anyone else reading this: why exactly is jumping straight to mental illness as the source of any disagreement not ableist? Does someone who struggles with mental health get no say on literally any topic?

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 07:25 collapse

Blah blah fuck tankies. Fuck Putin. Fuck the CCP. Fuck hexbear.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 07:28 collapse

riveting comment. truly, I’ve never read this type of comment before and now I’ve been owned!!!

I will now give the obligatory response: amerikkka is a dying empire and will not be able to stop China and socialism. die mad about it loser.

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 07:31 collapse

TRIGGERED

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 07:44 collapse

I had assumed you were a bog standard democrat but I apologize, didn’t realize I was speaking to someone who likes to watch “FEMINIST OWNED AND TRIGGERED!!!” youtube compilations

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 07:48 collapse

Stop insulting feminists by comparing yourself to one.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 07:59 collapse

don’t pretend like you care about that, your fellow chuds might find this comment on accident and you wouldn’t want to make them mad would you?

[deleted] on 07 Sep 08:32 collapse
.
TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 08:43 next collapse

I’m well past caring

you are crying about upvotes and downvotes you can’t say this when you’re doing that

Putin fucks male prostitutes.

in awe at this one, why would I care about this

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 12:21 next collapse

in awe at this one, why would I care about this

The secret is thinking Leftists actually like Putin, plus the added homophobia, implying gay sex is somehow bad or wrong in the first place.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 12:41 collapse

also implies they don’t think prostitution is rape in the first place too I think, just terrible comment all around really

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 12:43 collapse

Yep, it’s awful on multiple levels, on top of enthusiastic ableism.

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 15:33 collapse

China’s economy is crashing.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 15:49 next collapse

i see gordon chang taught you well my friend. I’m sure china will collapse for sure this time next year. wait sorry I know you don’t read books you must watch those yt channels that spam a vid every couple of days about china collapsing next month for the last however many years its been since that infinite money glitch was found

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 17:01 collapse

Gottem <img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/eac5813b-c51c-4dff-9f00-6c7d4343791b.jpeg">

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 17:30 collapse

yet another classic. you have displayed president xi as a beloved children’s cartoon character (that just happens to be yellow 🤔 ) what ever shall I do

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 17:33 collapse

Cryophillia is just dedicated to racism and ableism, as usual.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 17:40 collapse

kinda sad really it’s all so boring and it’s all just the same conversations with libs like this over the internet, they say china is collapsing i make fun of them for being an acolyte of gordon chang, they call president xi winnie the pooh I point out it’s a really old boring joke that smacks of racism, can’t they come up with something new for once?

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 17:43 next collapse

If liberals could perform correct materialist analysis they wouldn’t be liberals any longer.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 17:47 collapse

it’s not even material analysis so much as a complete lack of creativity. again, they are so fucking boring and unimaginative, I feel like I have deja vu everytime I even get into a slapfight like this where we’re not arguing anymore just hurling jabs and dunks and what not

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 04:32 collapse

kinda sad really it’s all so boring and it’s all just the same conversations with libs like this over the internet

“God, everywhere I go it smells like dog shit!”

refuses to check bottom of own shoe

davel@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 04:03 collapse

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/01489466-4082-4aa7-ba1a-87e7cca30a45.png">

irreticent@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 00:48 collapse

Judging by vote totals, we’re already in that sea of .ml alts brigading on behalf of hexbear that I mentioned.

I always laugh when someone assumes the reason why they’re being downvoted because their assumption is almost always wrong.

I downvoted you because of how childish you’re behaving. If you don’t debate in a civil manner nobody will take your argument seriously. Regardless of whether I agree with your argument or not, trolling always deserves a downvote.

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 04:31 collapse

Then you’re another useful idiot. You can’t have a civil discussion with propagandists. They can lie far faster than you can call them out on it. All you can do is troll them.

irreticent@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 06:03 collapse

Then you’re another useful idiot.

How so?

You can’t have a civil discussion with propagandists. They can lie far faster than you can call them out on it. All you can do is troll them.

That’s all? Seems like someone might be using psychological projection when they call others a “useful idiot.”

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 23:28 collapse

Yeah that’s all. You can’t have a civil discussion with propagandists.

echolalia@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 06:42 collapse

Have you considered you are just observing this:

<img alt="" src="https://64.media.tumblr.com/1e9cd321e4266e8f77ec2723c9ed72ed/tumblr_pt3gyieHKi1qg1n95_1280.png">

Hexbear is for communists to talk to communists. They get plenty of the “default” liberal opinions from waves hands around vaguely and are entitled to their own community, no?.

Obviously if you go into Hexbear and just start posting anti-China stuff they’re going to ban you. It’s not like the English-speaking world is bereft of anti-China news articles.

PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 07:08 next collapse

This isn’t accurate, they were very active in brigandine other federations, hitting random threads on .world for instance with hundreds of reply comments drowning out anything that may be a tiny bit critical of china or Russia. Or pro west.

There wereultiple cross-posts daily pointing to specific threads posted on hexbear to organize brigading.

carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 07:23 next collapse

This isn’t accurate, they were very active in brigandine other federations, hitting random threads on .world for instance with hundreds of reply comments drowning out anything that may be a tiny bit critical of china or Russia. Or pro west.

Have you considered that their users were just browsing the front page and what you’re describing is just the nature of lemmy and how federation works?

There wereultiple cross-posts daily pointing to specific threads posted on hexbear to organize brigading.

You’re likely referring to the_dunk_tank which is a community that encourages bullying homophobia, transphobia, fascists and liberale (pretty based imo)

echolalia@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 07:39 next collapse

There wereultiple cross-posts daily pointing to specific threads posted on hexbear to organize brigading.

Yeah, I do remember that. That’s why I’m not signed up there. They weren’t changing anyone’s minds with their shitstirring and were doing it for their own enjoyment (which is damaging to all communities, even nonpolitical ones, if people avoid your platform due to trolling).

That said, it was a past problem, and posters on lemmy.world are still out there complaining about Hexbear like they’re relevant. I’m speaking about the current situation.

I’m not advocating for them to re-federate with lemmy.world (I have no dog in the race, anyway, being a part of neither instance) but I do remember watching the Hexbear mods/admins shutting down the actual brigading of threads before lemmy.world de-federated. Not sure it was a solvable problem, anyway, Hexbear is rather antagonistic in ways I don’t agree with.

Diva@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 09:32 next collapse

hitting random threads on .world for instance with hundreds of reply comments

.world preemptively defederated from hexbear “as a last resort” can you clarify when the events you’re referring to would have happened?

bdonvr@thelemmy.club on 07 Sep 12:33 collapse

hitting random threads on .world

Dang that’s pretty impressive for an instance that got blocked by .world before they ever started federating.

Or did I already miss make stuff up o’clock?

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 07:24 collapse

I’m not trying to join their cult. I’m not feeling excluded from their cult. I’m saying their cult should not exist. It is a mixture of crazy people and Chinese propaganda, and it deserves to be stamped out.

echolalia@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 07:43 next collapse

Ah yea, everyone that has an opinion that isn’t mine is dangerous and deserves to be silenced. I totally agree. I think lemmy.world should refederate, and then defederate a second time, just to make sure they get the message.

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 07:46 next collapse

Not everyone who disagrees with me. Just extremists and morons. Tankies happen to be both.

REAL communists are cool. Hexbear is a pile of shit.

Soggy@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 09:04 next collapse

Are the real communists kept around back with the real scotsmen?

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 15:35 collapse

Real communists keep quiet around hexbear because they don’t associate with those idiots.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 12:18 collapse

What do you consider a real Communist, if not people who read Communist Theory, advocate for Communism, and defend real movements towards Communism?

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 15:28 collapse

Not tankies.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 15:36 collapse

Why do you, a self-professed liberal that has not read Communist Theory, get to pull the No-True-Scotsman card on Communists?

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 15:38 collapse

Pisses off tankies

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 15:43 collapse

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/facba70b-04ec-4544-aa7c-259142c31264.png">

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 17:02 collapse

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c19e72e2-7fe9-449c-9140-0f6f9c4ae4f7.jpeg">

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 17:08 collapse

Regular reminder that Communists hate Putin and the Russian Federation

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 17:13 collapse

It’s been on my mind recently that the global hope of lgbt people is China.

🤣🤣🤣

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 17:15 collapse

Go on, copy Awoo’s full quote.

It’s been on my mind recently that the global hope of lgbt people is China.

That’s gonna sound weird to anyone that thinks China is anti-lgbt, but the reality is that only exists among the old and they’re phasing out. China’s trajectory for lgbt issues is likely to be positive, because China’s trajectory for PEOPLE issues is positive.

The west is in decline, and with it the marginalised groups are being scapegoated as targets to distract the population from their declining conditions. Lgbt issues are likely to deteriorate across the west as the decline continues, as are other issues such as migrants and race.

China will represent a population of 1.4 billion people in ascendancy and with a positive trend towards these issues I believe it’s going to eventually become the place with the best conditions along similar lines to Cuba. It will represent the largest block of lgbt people in the world, and the lgbt people of China will become the largest advocate of lgbt conditions elsewhere in the world.

This hasn’t happened yet, but the trends are there. It’s coming in the longterm.

NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 08:02 collapse

How authoritarian

SSJMarx@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 18:14 collapse

The Falun Gong are, right now, kidnapping children and brainwashing them into being performers for their shitty dance troupe. These performers are not paid, cannot leave The Compound, and cannot contact their family. That’s a cult that the government should stamp out.

Hexbear is a bunch of people with a different opinion on the western world’s designated Enemy Governments. They’re not in the same ballpark, or even playing the same sport.

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 04:35 collapse

Lol who the fuck said anything about Falun Gong? That’s out of left field. You got a bug in your programming?

SSJMarx@lemm.ee on 09 Sep 05:54 collapse

We were talking about cults, I brought them up as an example. I could have just as easily used Scientology.

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 06:09 collapse

i guess I don’t understand your point. Cults are bad, seems like we agree on that.

SSJMarx@lemm.ee on 09 Sep 06:33 collapse

Right. I was saying that Hexbear isn’t a cult on the same level as the named examples, that it’s just some people with a different view of global politics than the norm, in response to a commenter who insisted that they were a dangerous cult that should be stamped out.

Cryophilia@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 23:27 collapse

Ah. Well I disagree, I think they’re on an equal level of danger and detachment from reality and susceptibility of their members to abuse. Definitely a cult.

They’re not just people with different political views. They’re a cult that vigorously polices their orthodoxy. Dissent is not tolerated.

Pollux@leminal.space on 07 Sep 10:36 next collapse

If you’re a rabid right winger like most redditors anyone with half a brain will seem crazy.

foxontherocks@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 08:52 collapse

That is what they hate.

b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 06 Sep 22:46 next collapse

Nope. They seem pretty sane and rational in comparison to places like Reddit, Lemmy.world, Twitter, 4chan, Facebook, etc.

Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 07 Sep 00:42 next collapse

Found the Hexbear user doing a psy-op.

Edit: stay mad, tankies.

bloodfart@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 01:04 next collapse

That persons instance and hexbear are defederated. It’s unlikely they’re a secret hexbear user.

b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 01:30 next collapse

Yep, to be clear ideologically I fall more into the “queer anarchist” camp and am not an authoritarian communist.

I know that hexbear is mostly old chapotraphouse posters who are more in the Marxist-Leninist camp. I don’t agree with them on many things, but I think their brand of being rude and insulting to capitalists and liberals is valid and kind of funny.

Not only is capitalism morally reprehensible and responsible for colonisation, white supremacy, inequality, and genocide. It’s also just a really stupid and nonsensical system that expects infinite growth within a system with finite resources. It’s a death cult with the growth pattern of cancer. Continuing with that system in spite of decades of empirical evidence that it is leading our world into collapse is completely insane in my opinion. People who believe in that shouldn’t be reasoned with, they should be insulted.

Anyway on first glance through hexbear I didn’t see anything “completely insane”. However if I go to somewhere like Reddit what I see is the complete insanity of people justifying and making excuses for morally reprehensible systems such as capitalism and acts of genocide.

I think liberals and centrists view themselves as being rational and reasonable when they’re not at all.

bloodfart@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 02:52 next collapse

The screeching communist/queer anarchist sixth international unified front with the collaborative goal of placing all liberals, conservatives and centrists in reeducation camps

Diva@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 10:41 collapse

I feel like a lot of the wider lemmy users surprised by hexbear users haven’t met very many trans people, because autistic transfems showing up in fly Soviet military surplus is not exactly out of the ordinary at a trans event.

uienia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 08:56 next collapse

What a disingenous comment. Having two accounts of two defederated instances makes even more sense than having them on two federated instances.

bloodfart@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 15:14 collapse

Did you see how the person in question replied directly to my comment with “yep, you’re right”?

I wonder if it’s possible to be disingenuous and deadass, stone cold, half court buckets right…

arefx@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 09:50 collapse

Prolly just a regular idiot then

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 21:48 collapse

huh, surprisingly this tanke isn’t using the hard r

arefx@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 02:03 collapse

I’m not a tankie lol. I’ll use this opportunity to encourage everyone to vote for Kamala Harris though, and to say fuck hexbear and it’s smooth brained users.

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 08 Sep 10:15 collapse

oh sorry for assuming all of .ml users are tankies, please go switch to another instance though as you will be categorized as a tankie.

arefx@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 20:14 collapse

Yeah I’ve been meaning to but I’m lazy. When I signed up I didn’t k ow much about lemmy and ml was popular with signups

Deinonychusanti@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 12:25 collapse

Have you considered that its simply possible for somebody to have an opinion that differs from your own?

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 13:02 collapse

It’s Leate, he exclusively accuses everyone of being a bot and blocked me for saying Lenin was a Marxist.

Cyanocobalamin@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 07 Sep 01:16 collapse

You wrote reddit twice in a row.

b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 01:31 collapse

😆

stoly@lemmy.world on 06 Sep 23:09 next collapse

Yes. Block the community and move on.

SorteKanin@feddit.dk on 07 Sep 06:01 collapse

You should petition your admins to defederate or move to an instance that does so.

stoly@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 06:12 collapse

People complain about world but I like it here. This is my third instance.

Strayce@lemmy.sdf.org on 07 Sep 00:34 next collapse

Not really. They have a lot of bits and in-jokes which are going to seem incomprehensible to anyone from the outside, but most of them are pretty chill if you engage in good faith. It’s like a lot of tech communities; if you don’t do your research and ask intelligent questions, you’re likely to get told to RTFM.

hashferret@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 02:22 next collapse

Red Team Field Manual? /s

prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 06:08 collapse

Yeah it’s just like that… except that they advocate for the murder and starvation of countless people as a step in a process towards a utopia that cannot exist.

But yeah just a bunch of fun people with inside jokes

Arelin@lemmy.zip on 07 Sep 06:45 next collapse

I have not seen anyone there advocating for capitalism though?

Scorpius@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 06:54 collapse

Your last comment is literally eco-fascist shit and you’re concern trolling about starvation?

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/9810bd49-b73e-4a8a-967c-b8646c2663e1.webp">

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 12:14 next collapse

Every accusation is a confession, it seems

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 21:47 collapse

name every genocide without bias.

prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 10 Sep 05:05 collapse

I don’t understand… I was describing the reality of climate change. Does that make you uncomfortable?

Yeah, I think humans deserve the consequences of our actions with respect to climate change. And…?

Was I advocating for it? Do you maybe not know what that word means?

How does it feel to be the person who takes screenshots of other people’s comments on an Internet forum because you think it’s some kind of “gotcha”?

electric_nan@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 00:43 next collapse

🙄

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 01:11 collapse

🫡

KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 07 Sep 01:55 next collapse

given my experience with the chapotraphouse community, yes.

DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social on 07 Sep 06:01 next collapse

I don’t think Hexbear is really the same thing these days

KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 07 Sep 19:12 collapse

maybe not, but that was my experience with it lol

Saint_La_Croix_Crosse@midwest.social on 07 Sep 11:47 collapse

wait, like the drug dealer?

KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 07 Sep 19:12 collapse

no clue i was only in there for like 5 minutes before being told to kill myself and getting banned lmao

scoobford@lemmy.zip on 07 Sep 02:33 next collapse

Many of them, yes. They’re among the most radical of the leftist instances, which means that they attract a lot of propagandists and tankies. They have some perfectly reasonable people too, but you know, vocal minority. Its the main thing most people notice about those instances.

Many people block hexbear, Lemmy.ml, and lemmygrad for these reasons.

skeezix@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 03:35 next collapse

What is a ‘tankie’?

ShepherdPie@midwest.social on 07 Sep 03:55 next collapse

Pro-China sycophants. They’d be the ones driving the tanks at Tiananman Square.

I’d also argue that these people only put up a facade of being leftist. I’ve never once seen a hexbear user actually make arguments for leftist policies, socialism, or communism. They just shitpost a bunch of anti-American memes and rally for the Russian and Chinese governments.

[deleted] on 07 Sep 04:25 collapse
.
[deleted] on 07 Sep 03:57 next collapse
.
Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com on 07 Sep 04:01 next collapse

Someone ideologically somewhere between his greatest heroes, Stalin and Mao.

Facebones@reddthat.com on 07 Sep 04:13 next collapse

In theory, the things the other replies said.

In practice, anything left of the average Lemmy.world liberal/democrat.

I don’t Lemmy enough to say there are zero hexbear users who are pro China or pro wtfever people say, but I see almost none of the ridiculous shit the rest of Lemmy claim exclusively happens there. What I DO see is liberals (usually from lemmy.world if we’re swinging at instances) talking ridiculous trollish shit to hexbear users than using the silly trollish responses they get in response to justify these “all hexbears want to give America to Xi Jinping” posts.

expr@programming.dev on 07 Sep 12:23 collapse

I dunno, I ended up blocking the instance way before I knew about their reputation (like, when I first joined Lemmy) because all of the users their kept posting the most unhinged shit.

I have definitely seen blatant apologism for China/Russia from them.

FWIW, I’m much further left than your average Democrat (I consider myself a leftist/anarchist). I personally don’t consider what I’ve seen from them to be very “left”, just authoritarian.

Facebones@reddthat.com on 07 Sep 14:19 collapse

I was sure to not be an absolutist for a reason, I’m not always cruising Lemmy. Hexbear in particular absolutely has a sense of humor sometimes that I myself am a bit old for, but judging them for that is very much more “Old man yelling at clouds” than anything. If you don’t like it, sure, but that doesn’t say A or B about them.

Maybe there’s blatant apologism, but in my experience it’s people taking whatever scraps they can find to claim “Apologism.” For example, discussing high speed rail development in China. Admiring a rail system isn’t “blatant apologism,” but most lemmy liberals would call it as such, because it was built by China. It’s like calling me a Putin apologist for discussing Dostoyevsky. Yes, I’m admiring a creation of the country or it’s culture, but I’m not saying that their current governments are the only way forward or really saying anything about governance at all.

Again, I’m not claiming you haven’t seen something “blatant” before (I could name so many one off events I’ve witnessed that don’t hold to norms,) I’m just saying that people claiming it to be this widespread norm on every leftist instance are spreading disinformation.

expr@programming.dev on 07 Sep 15:27 collapse

Sure, perhaps it’s possible that I saw an unusually high amount of apologists, but I’m saying that it happened enough times and consistently enough that it prompted me to block them before I even knew anything about them, which I think at least says something. I won’t claim to know what the majority opinion there is, but I don’t think it’s a stretch to say that it’s an abnormal amount.

Facebones@reddthat.com on 07 Sep 18:49 next collapse

As I mentioned, I’d be inclined to wonder what you’re considering “apologism.” The fact that you didn’t address the points I made makes me think you fall into that camp of boiling an intentionally wide array of ideas, conversation, etc down to “apologism” to take up arms against instances you don’t like. I see discussion of those countries, and examples of things that are happening there, but not one time have I seen people celebrating violence or excusing it on either hexbear or .ml.

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 06:51 collapse

Don’t be gaslit, Russian warcrimes enjoyers are running wild on Nazbear.

What you saw is what I saw too, and that’s just disgusting. Don’t be fooled.

I’ve seen them pulling the debatebro tactics they complain about, and feigning ignorance when you talk about their favorite dictators.

Those people aren’t acting in good faith, and are trying to manipulate you. They’re pissed that they’re being treated like pariahs and are defederated from everything, because their influence has shrunk significantly and they’ve essentially been defanged (they’re getting banned left and right, even by real lefties).

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 05:01 next collapse

the original origin of the term was a group british communists attacking anyone who supported the Soviet Union’s crushing of the hungarian uprising in 1956. it then morphed into a term used to attack anyone who supports the use of force and authority in general to suppress counter revolutionaries. it’s final degeneration is that it is now used to attack anyone to the left of an american democrat like facebones said.

redsails.org/tankies/

here is a good article about it. To be clear: this is written from the perspective of a marxist leninist, who are normally the number one target of being called a “tankie”. Still, it is very short, and redsails is a really cool website that has the footnotes with citations pop up as you read long

RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 07 Sep 05:36 next collapse

It’s extremely unconvincing to say “Sure it was horrible last time, but next time it’ll be different.” Trotskyists and ultraleftists compensate by prettying up their picture of socialism and picking more obscure (usually short-lived) experiments to uphold as the real deal. But this just gives ammunition to those who say “Socialism doesn’t work” or “Socialism is a utopian fantasy.” And lurking behind the whole conversation is Stalin, who for the average Westerner represents the unadvisability of trying to radically change the world at all. No matter how much you insist that your thing isn’t Stalinist, the specter of Stalin is still going to affect how people think about (any form of) socialism — tankies have decided that there is no getting around the problem of addressing Stalin’s legacy. That legacy, as it stands, at least in Western public opinion (they feel differently about him in other parts of the world), is largely the product of Cold War propaganda.

That’s the gist. Then he goes on with another paragraph of whataboutism but of course not a single mention of the tens of millions of dead both, Stalin and Mao, were responsible for.

Of course he’s also an western armchair socialist. People that actually lived in the Sowjet Union (and not in today’s Russia) draw quite a different picture.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 05:56 next collapse

The thing is, delinking socialism from Stalin also means delinking it from the Soviet Union, disavowing everything that’s been done under the name of socialism as “Stalinist.” The “socialism” that results from this procedure is defined as grassroots, bottom-up, democratic, non-bureaucratic, nonviolent, non-hierarchical… in other words, perfect. So whenever real revolutionaries (say, for example, the Naxals in India) do things imperfectly they are cast out of “socialism” and labeled “Stalinists.” This is clearly an example of respectability politics run amok. Tankies believe that this failure of solidarity, along with the utopian ideas that the revolution can win without any kind of serious conflict or without party discipline, are more significant problems for the left than is “authoritarianism” (see Engels for more on this last point). [5] We believe that understanding the problems faced by Stalin and Mao helps us understand problems generic to socialism, that any successful socialism will have to face sooner or later. This is much more instructive and useful than just painting nicer and nicer pictures of socialism while the world gets worse and worse.

this is directly preceding it. Even if I accepted your frankly hilarious black book of communism death tolls, the argument here is that the soviet union and China still greatly improved the lives of the average citizen compared to what came before while facing huge problems that you would crumble upon immediately upon encountering, like imminent war from the west that they predicted and prepared for correctly. As far as your other claim, it’s not nearly so simple as you make it out to be:

washingtonpost.com/…/why-do-so-many-people-miss-t… reuters.com/…/us-ebrd-transition-survey-idUSKBN14…

edit: also, nia frome is a trans woman

christian@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 07:23 collapse

This essay resonates with me, thanks for sharing, the author makes her points pretty effectively. I’m not a historian and I don’t know shit, but I think even if I give the critics the concession that everything is absolute rubbish, I still think there’s no convincing argument that the beliefs are dishonest or malicious or not genuine.

There’s so much bullshit and conflicting views about literally every historical event that I find it really hard to penetrate the context of the discussion and feel confident in anything, but I think the fact that I keep seeing people who hold “tankie” opinions dismissed as malicious propagandists pushes me very strongly towards feeling that the critics have not made any attempt to seriously engage with the ideas they’re fighting against.

I think the realization I’m coming to now is that when part of your ideology is that people who claim belief in a specific conflicting worldview can be dismissed as bots or propagandists, finding out that those people aren’t manufactured makes it a lot harder to take everything else you’ve said seriously.

On the other hand, the guy you’re replying to is correct that the author’s points fall completely flat and are ridiculous once you hunt down that specific paragraph and remove the context immediately before and after. Then it becomes obvious to an unbiased reader that the author actually ignored communist death tolls because it was inconvenient for her argument.

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 07:40 collapse

glad it managed to reach someone! If you want the best nuanced review of Stalin from anyone anywhere, you will have to read Stalin: History and Critique of a Black Legend by Domenico Losurdo (free pdf here!). It is well sourced, and also uses western sources that should be biased against stalin to make its arguments! review on the same site as the tankies article here: redsails.org/on-losurdos-stalin/

additionally, some other articles I highly recommend if you want to understand our position better:

redsails.org/why-marxism/
redsails.org/the-case-for-socialized-ownership/
redsails.org/concessions/
redsails.org/what-is-dialectics/
redsails.org/communist-self-confidence/

most of these are quite a bit longer, so sorry to flood you with them, but I’m always eager to share these excellent articles with anyone who will consider reading them!

Facebones@reddthat.com on 07 Sep 06:18 next collapse

It’s interesting how the only criticism anybody can drum up is “tens of millions dead,” but nobody bats an eye at the death toll of capitalism, capitalist countries, and their endless war machine/endless interference in other countries via funding coups or outright assassinations in support of harmful leaders who will play nice with the corporations.

Your link describes discussion of labor camps as if it’s some long lost relic of a bygone era - but slavery of inmates is, right now, legal and prevalent in the US subsidizing private industries for pennies on the dollar. It references the conditions of the camps, but plenty of current US inmates face subhuman conditions and treatment. You imply that everybody suffered all the time under the Soviets, but a far from insignificant number (depending on how you do the numbers, with more support for the USSR than we have for our own government this past decade or so) remember the USSR fondly, or at least as better than their current governments.

All the things y’all constantly belt about to argue socialism is the great evil of the world is shit we do now that you support as long as it benefits private entities instead of public. I’m not going to argue that everything was perfect, or that nobody was corrupt, but I WILL argue that y’all spend a lot of time defending those same imperfections and corruptions under capitalism with this lazy weak ass “but fixing it would be spooky scary socialism” argument. Per the common reasons people call socialism a failure, so is capitalism. That’s why leftists call for, as you call it, “prettied up” socialism - not to fool people, but because what we’re doing now is FAILING EVERYBODY and tripling down on funneling even more of our economy to 1-3% of the population hasn’t helped anything so it’s time for something different and realistic change is gradual, not “seizing the means of production” overnight. Practically, we find a functional balance like the rest of the “first” world.

To co-opt my criticism of zionists defending genocide with the “1,200 dead” figure: If tens of millions dead under socialism makes you so mad, just wait til you hear about the hundreds of millions dead under capitalism.

((I don’t know anything about how to do the thing notating an image so in the off chance it helps someone: Drake No/Yes Meme DrakeNo - tyranny.gov DrakeYes - tyranny.com )) <img alt="" src="https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/742d125d-2783-4bf8-ad11-52f92ef7d436.jpeg">

RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 07 Sep 10:01 collapse

Yet more whataboutism. This thread is about tankies not capitalist slavery.

Facebones@reddthat.com on 07 Sep 14:02 collapse

Maybe you shouldn’t have defended your point with a link using these talking points then if you didn’t want them responded to.

Thanks for proving my point though about liberals just saying shit then going “SeEeEe??!?!” no matter the response.

SSJMarx@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 00:03 collapse

the tens of millions of dead both, Stalin and Mao, were responsible for.

Oh no! Won’t somebody think of the Nazis and Japanese invaders?

michaelmrose@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 05:37 collapse

Stalin and Mao both killed a hell of a lot of their own people that is what they are referring to

SSJMarx@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 07:18 collapse

They said “tens of millions”, the only number of people killed that matches that scope is the number of enemy combatants in world war 2.

Regardless, the Kulaks and the Landlords deserved it.

michaelmrose@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 08:27 collapse

Mao was responsible for the deaths of 30-50M in famine. Estimates of Stalins score from famine, execution, forced relocation, labor camps is more difficult to ascertain. Estimates range from 3 -20M. Whether you disagree with this estimate it is incredibly likely that the prior poster was referencing the 33M–70M who died in intolerable conditions not the nazis.

The fact that you justify the state getting in the systemic murder business for any cause is a fundamental difference between our understanding of what can ever be morally acceptable.

SSJMarx@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 18:52 collapse

The fact that they don’t tell you in the average anticommunist pop history youtube video is that China had been experiencing famines pretty much every single year for a thousand years by the time the Communists took over. The last famines occurred under Communist rule, but it is because of Communist policies that the cyclical famines stopped. This applies to the USSR as well.

Yes we can look back and see that killing the sparrows was a bad idea, but on the whole collectivized farms produced more food per hectare than smallholder farms did, and the policies of the Communists are what brought in sufficient numbers of tractors and other farming equipment to modernize outdated practices in rural regions. Without the Communists the simple fact is that the famines would have happened anyway, they would have been worse, and there would have been more of them.

This is the reason why, even when you include the famine deaths in your data, the average lifespan under Mao doubled from what it had been when the Republic of China controlled the mainland. The Communists won the war precisely because they treated peasants better than the then-central government did, and when they took power they enacted policies that massively improved the lives of everyone in China, and still continue to do so.

michaelmrose@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 06:11 collapse

It sounds like ANY state of any variety anywhere in the world any time in modern history could have ended famines and you are somehow ascribing the benefits of modern farming to communism.

SSJMarx@lemm.ee on 09 Sep 06:31 collapse

Any state can, but many don’t. And the point here was to explain why I don’t believe that blaming famine deaths on Mao Zedong is a justified position to take, when the cycle of famine was ended under his watch.

Urist@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 12:08 collapse

Did not know about this site. It was a nice read and their mission statement is cool. Thanks for sharing! :)

TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 12:12 collapse

o7 happy to hear that!

Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 05:52 next collapse

Apologists for authoritarian regimes that have either historically been communist or paint themselves as such currently.

Or as far as most of .world is concerned, anyone to the left of Joe Manchin.

ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 12:43 collapse

“Leftists” who are more interested in authoritarianism than leftism. At their very worst, they even ally with the far-right.

carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 16:37 collapse

www.marxists.org/archive/marx/…/authority.htm

ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 18:52 collapse

“Authoritarianism is when people want things, not when government exerts force!”

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 19:10 next collapse

Are you saying that Marx and Engels weren’t Leftists?

ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 19:14 collapse

Not at all. They were wrong on certain things, which people like Stalin used to justify his own horrible stuff.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 19:16 collapse

You’re linked a direct refutation on “anti-authouritarians” from Engels. Marx and Engels were criticized as “Authoritarian” by Anarchists of their era. Either Marx and Engels were Authoritarian in your eyes and thus not Leftists, or the Authoritarian argument itself is misplaced as a thought-terminating cliche as Engels points out, that avoids grappling with the Marxist theory of the State.

carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 21:06 collapse

You might wanna work on your reading comprehension if that is what you get from Engels text

PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 07:02 next collapse

I have yet to see any reasonableness from hexbear.

Hell, I had a few members tell me that I was part of the evil capitalist elite because I had a job.

They brigade like annoying unwanted fleas that you cannot get rid of.

christian@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 09:10 next collapse

I had a few members tell me that I was part of the evil capitalist elite because I had a job.

Definitely a joke, I’m having trouble imagining a person who could believe this in earnest, let alone enough to say it out loud. I’m even having trouble accepting that you can imagine that a person would say this with no sarcasm. No one actually believes that.

edit: just realized that maybe you’re trying to be funny and I’m slow on the uptake

Objection@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 17:34 collapse

Hell, I had a few members tell me that I was part of the evil capitalist elite because I had a job.

Anytime a person claims something happened on the fediverse without providing a link to it, they are lying or misrepresenting what happened literally 100% of the time.

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 21:46 collapse

excluding anything tanke related.

Objection@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 22:27 collapse

Especially anything tankie related.

Y’all will believe literally anything with zero evidence of it means making people you don’t like look bad.

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 08 Sep 10:22 collapse

how the fuck do tankies fall for communism, LIKE HOW?

Objection@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 16:21 collapse

Well, for starters, I don’t blindly believe anything people say about it.

lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com on 07 Sep 11:07 next collapse

My definition of left and theirs are very different.

foxontherocks@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 08:51 collapse

Tankie is such a weird thing to call these communists. They are way way less violent than liberals and conservatives are. They don’t even support any on going genocides like the others do.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 13:19 collapse

The historical through-line is that the term originated from British Communists that supported the USSR putting down the Hungarian Counter-Revolution, which involved tanks and violent fighting.

Nowadays, Tankie is used for everyone left of liberalism that agrees with the Marxist theory of the State, rather than the Anarchist, it’s muddled and has no meaning.

Arelin@lemmy.zip on 07 Sep 06:22 next collapse

Damn it’s nice to see the comments are surprisingly evenly split between hating on it and actually being reasonable. Quite a difference from when redditors first moved in here last year.

I guess the more people talk about it, the more people actually visit it for themselves and form their own opinions.

uienia@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 08:58 next collapse

Nah, it is just a lot of hexbear alt accounts like yourself on your disingenously labeled “reasonable” side.

Diva@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 09:24 next collapse

Everyone I disagree with is a secret hexbear

OpenStars@discuss.online on 07 Sep 15:08 next collapse

Not all. People over-generalize to forget that Lemmy.ml (and lately more people from Midwest.social) have always blended the experiences, being able to post to both “sides” like hexbear.net and lemmy.world that are defederated from one another.

And lemm.ee too though iirc they consider themselves more truly neutral than leftists?

And some alts too ofc:-).

TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 23:14 collapse

I’m a lefty but I didn’t know which instances leaned which way when I got here. I chose lemm.ee because their defed policy itself was neutral and that appealed to me because I can do my own damn blocking thank you.

OpenStars@discuss.online on 08 Sep 00:52 collapse

You can now… and if you were willing to go individually account-by-account, then you always could. I’m glad you found your niche - it’s nice to widen your worldview and listen to it all, sometimes:-).

Though I’m on the other end of the spectrum: having spent nearly a decade listening to people’s oddball takes on everything under the sun, and bending over backwards to accommodate it all as if it had some semblance of validity, I now find myself wanting to substantially narrow my input stream. Ngl, reading and watching/listening to - and more importantly thinking deeply about - such things as Innuendo Studios’ The Alt Right Playbook, and the actual Trump presidency that caused our current inflation crisis and oh yeah killed more people than all wars combined iirc, really changed my approach on giving such viewpoints the time of day. There’s a difference between sounding smart (like screetching: “show me your source material, bitch!”, while also looking down on the recipient in every way), vs. actually being thus, imho.

However, if you want to keep your finger on the pulse of many sides regarding a particular matter, then I’m so glad that the federated servers allow us each to experience such a diversity of goals, even on the same platform! 😄

carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 16:34 next collapse

Cope lol

Corgana@startrek.website on 07 Sep 19:26 collapse

💯It’s the classic alt-right playbook of prioritizing civility over the actual message.

[deleted] on 08 Sep 04:32 collapse
.
Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 12:12 next collapse

I guess the more people talk about it, the more people actually visit it for themselves and form their own opinions.

That’s the biggest kicker, since many instances are defederated they get secondhand filters of information, creating an image of Hexbear that just doesn’t align with reality. Anyone considering themselves a Leftist should at least check it out for themselves.

flashgnash@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 21:09 collapse

Every single person I’ve seen defending it has been a lemmy.ml user which from my understanding is not too dissimilar from hexbears

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 21:18 collapse

Lemmy.ml is run by Communists and has a lot of Communists in general (ml itself is a reference to Marxism-Leninism), Communists are going to be sympathetic towards Communists.

Edie@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 23:23 collapse

I couldn’t let it go.

Nutomic: I always thought that .ml was used simply because its free. But what do I know…

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 23:32 next collapse

Wow, really? That’s quite the coincidence then.

Edie@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 23:38 collapse

Yes. .ml isn’t an ML instance so far as I understand, the devs and admins are MLs, so its generally leftists, but not specifically ML, that’s 'grad.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 23:39 collapse

I’m aware that it doesn’t require its users to be MLs, but the perception even within Lemmy.ml to my knowledge is that its ML focused.

[deleted] on 08 Sep 07:14 collapse
.
Edie@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 10:31 collapse

Nope

PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 07:01 next collapse

Yes

Alsephina@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 07:29 next collapse

Congratulations OP, this post made it to Hexbear! 🎉

[deleted] on 07 Sep 07:49 next collapse
.
Alsephina@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 07:53 next collapse

From viewing it? I don’t think that’s a thing

OpenStars@discuss.online on 07 Sep 15:01 collapse

Your instance allows it, so you probably blocked them, at which point it won’t show up on your instance using your account.

Or something weird with your chosen app.

Either way you can use the webpage interface to view it directly in a browser if you want, entirely anonymously (though to comment you’d need to unblock them first).

figaro@lemdro.id on 07 Sep 15:05 collapse

My bad, you are correct 👍

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 12:00 next collapse

Haha. I didn’t know they liked so much. Can you highlight some good comments for me?

Arelin@lemmy.zip on 07 Sep 12:54 collapse

I don’t think most people on this thread like you very much either lol

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 12:59 collapse

That’s cool.

ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 12:29 next collapse

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/605da72e-c5ab-4ea2-8dcd-7bf6c51f3288.png">

Everyone less authoritarian than Stalin (or even worse, being left of) is literally stormfront, except Russia, which is fine.

Alsephina@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 12:53 next collapse

They’re talking about the ableists and fascists on this thread dumbass

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/803de555-9802-464b-8c81-0dd0c50c05c7.png">

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/67175db6-11b3-43b1-9a72-c93cc8889cb9.png">

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 12:54 collapse

Regular reminder that Hexbear hates Putin and the Russian Federation

TachyonTele@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 23:27 collapse

Right. They ‘hate Russia’, and anything in the west.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 23:31 collapse

The Global North operates by over-exploiting the Global South.

TachyonTele@lemm.ee on 12 Sep 12:51 collapse

What other catch phrases have you learned?

Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 08 Sep 04:31 collapse

Oh look, a brigading bunch of cunts.

arefx@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 09:49 next collapse

Yes they are insane/extremists

raunz@mander.xyz on 07 Sep 10:41 next collapse

The mods sure are on the insanity spectrum.

lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com on 07 Sep 11:05 next collapse

It’s common sense there that Israel must be destroyed and they use pronouns like “comerade/them”.

And most important: They silence everyone who does not agree.

They are sowjet fan boys and try to build such a hierarchical system online.

Just block them…

Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 14:29 collapse

It’s common sense there that Israel must be destroyed and they use pronouns like “comerade/them”.

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/254483e1-2e78-4e56-b786-bf146f9d096b.png">

OozingPositron@feddit.cl on 07 Sep 16:47 collapse

Kek

Linkerbaan@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 12:02 next collapse

Most of the Lemmy.World users and mods are actively advocating to vote for Genocide, so i understand that Hexbear is a culture shock.

thericofactor@sh.itjust.works on 07 Sep 12:34 next collapse

Because hexbear users would never do that, right? You’re fighting your battle on the wrong battleground.

Linkerbaan@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 12:48 collapse

There’s definitely some users there who go too far in their support for other imperialist superpowers like Russia and China.

Because if America bad Russia and China good is an easy train of thought. Imperialism bad is a more difficult pill to accept.

But users there moreso question whether certain atrocities happened. They’re not saying ‘yeah the CCP is currently Genociding Uyghurs in concentration camps. but you have to vote for Xi Jingping to save Democracy’.

Occasionally I do find they have a point in the West exaggerating others crimes. I mostly started noticing this after Hamas supposedly beheaded 40 babies in ovens which our media blasted as fact without questioning it. Though other times there is usually a base of truth which is undeniable.

But admitting that your side is doing Genocide and still advocating for them comes off as far more insane to me than denying their crimes.

carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 16:27 collapse

their support for other imperialist superpowers like Russia and China

I wonder what definition of imperialism you’re using. China doesn’t have a financial capitalist class which influences it’s government to seek foreign markets (i.e. overthrow foreign governments to privatize their state assets for the financial capitalist class to buy up)

Because if America bad Russia and China good is an easy train of thought.

It may seem to lib outside observers like that

But users there moreso question whether certain atrocities happened. They’re not saying ‘yeah the CCP is currently Genociding Uyghurs in concentration camps. but you have to vote for Xi Jingping to save Democracy’.

Tell me you haven’t lurked there without having told me you having lurked there and talking out of your ass.

Linkerbaan@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 18:12 collapse

China most definitely has billionaires in cahoots with the government. Evergrande is a great example of this. Asianometry did a great video on how deep it goes with receipts.

I’ve had two discussions with users about the Uyghur camps which were not able to address the base of my concerns. While they are definitely very exaggerated in size, the notion that they don’t exist seems unfounded. Though I’m open for discussion on it.

carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 21:11 collapse

China most definitely has billionaires in cahoots with the government

Imperialism is when billionaires. The more billionaires you have the imperialister it is

Also redsails.org/china-has-billionaires/

I’ve had two discussions with users about the Uyghur camps which were not able to address the base of my concerns.

Sounds like you were concern trolling, because the burden of proof is on the accuser

Linkerbaan@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 22:43 collapse

Your statement about China not having a financialist capital class seemed slightly out of touch so I provided you with examples of some Chinese capital class. Communism is when not billionaires. The more Billionaires you have to less communism it is.

As for the imperialism I only hear the same argument as for Western imperialism: someone drew lines on a map 200 years ago and it said Xinjiang and Tibet were part of China. So despite them speaking a different language it’s now 100% ours for rizzle.

carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 04:12 collapse

Read more theory otherwise you sound like a kid like you do now.

Linkerbaan@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 07:30 collapse

I read a bit of the link and it was mostly mid mumbling that mentioned faults of China and then moved on as if addressing them solves them.

Then it proceeded to misdiagnose what greed is and pretend capitalism is a system designed around greed instead of greed being innate to humans.

Then I stopped because it doesn’t answer any of the questions.

I’m not saying everything China does is bad, certainly to grow as superpower when the West tries to overthrow all competition is massive achievement. But people are all too willing to deny faults of China.

carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 15:41 collapse

Your statement about China not having a financialist capital class seemed slightly out of touch so I provided you with examples of some Chinese capital class

I seems you have no clue what the difference between an industrial capitalist and a finacial capitalist is, because you provided not a example of finacial capitalists existing. You just showed me an example of a industrial/realestate capitalist eating shit. Not so much in cahoots after all then ,right? Not like the CPC declared the “3 red lines” in order to mitigate the bubble forming, not like there’s a 95% homeowner ship rate in china already and it’s just speculators eating shit, not like Asianometry is a very informed lib viewing the deliberate crash from a liberal perspective, right?

China’s banks are nationalized. When was theast time you heare about Jack Ma, who wanted to ascend to be a financial capitalist by circumventing finance laws with ANT pay?

Communism is when not billionaires. The more Billionaires you have to less communism it is.

See, what the CPC is doing is not communism. It’s market socialism, or SWCC to be more accurate, which is not without it’s contradictions. Communism cannot exist when Capitalism and Imperialism exists.

When you write stuff like:

instead of greed being innate to humans

Muh human nature

Or

As for the imperialism I only hear the same argument as for Western imperialism: someone drew lines on a map 200 years ago

I know for a fact you haven’t read theory and don’t want to be talking to you until you haven’t done your homework.

Linkerbaan@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 16:01 collapse

Arguing on semantics is a liberals game. Anyway the last user claimed China was definitely not cracking down on Xinjiang so I linked him this damning compilation.

Haven’t heard from him since.

Unless you’re going to claim cultural Genocide is fine when China does it because they call their imperialism differently I don’t really care for the argument.

carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 16:40 collapse

Semantics are important with words like “imperialism”, “capitalism” and other isms.

Xinjiang so I linked him this damning compilation.

Xinjiang has 1 mosque per ~500 Muslims and one of the highest densities with 25k mosques total

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mosques_in_China

Your (western) article makes an “analysis of 2,312 mosques once featuring Islamic architecture shows that three-quarters have been modified or destroyed since 2018.”

Which 1) is not that many compares to the total amount. 2) Has an interest in focussing on “modified” (i.e. renovated) and destroyed ones to make the 3/4 figure 3) apparently has access to that data, but refuses to list the total amount of destroyed ones.

Also cultural genocide is when Uyghur is an official languages and also used publicly everywhere. Cultural genocide is when you can freely practice your religion everywhere. Cultural genocide is when all Muslim majority visited the region and had no complaints. Apparently genocide on Muslims is not happening in Palestine (said by the same voices that do say it’s happening in China)

You might want to consider the context a bit (also with western sources): www.qiaocollective.com/education/xinjiang

Linkerbaan@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 18:46 collapse

Cultural Genocide is not equal to full on literal israel style delete everyone you don’t like. It is more similar to the French colonialism in Algeria (see imperialism) and their attempt to assimilate their subjects afterwards. Gradually ereasing a culture to ‘enlighten’ the population with le epic atheism.

Altering appearances of mosques to make them appear Chinese is an incredibly visually obvious step to slow-boiling the frog.

~2022; Xi Stresses Sinicization and Regulation of Religious Activities

Religious affairs in China should be regulated in accordance with the country’s socialist society, Xi said at the latest National Religious Affairs Meeting held in Beijing. Xi urged more nationalism, collectivism, socialism, and an improved understanding of history in the religious sector. He also emphasized the importance of the overall national security.

The religious sector should strengthen its self-education and management and should only conduct activities that respect laws and regulations, Xi said. China will also aim to ensure that party and government leadership have a sufficient understanding of Marxist religious views.

And if you don’t know what “Marxist religious views” means I recommend the document you linked earlier it was quite evidently not too fond of religion.

carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 19:31 collapse

Cultural Genocide is not equal to full on literal israel style delete everyone you don’t like.

Not what I was saying. I was saying that the same voices that say a “cultural genocide” is happening in China, are saying no genocide (not cultural, but the actual extermination of people) is happening in Palestine.

Altering appearances of mosques to make them appear Chinese is an incredibly visually obvious step to slow-boiling the frog.

Or you know, altering the building in a way it doesn’t crash on its worshipers i.e. renovating.

Sinicization involves aligning religion to Chinese culture, and can also extend to adherence to the nation’s political ideology and rules.

Like any fucking religion has to adhere to their host country. Basically it means if your interpretation of Islam is some radical shit where go stab random ass people you can get lost like they did with the western backed ETIM (Based)

Also you seem to have a very narrow understanding of culture. You haven’t addressed even how the language and cultural practices aren’t banned. Slow boiling the frog my ass

Linkerbaan@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 07:52 collapse

Classifying parts of religion you don’t like because you have to “combat terrorism” and assimilate your colonized population… where have I heard that one before

Or you know, altering the building in a way it doesn’t crash on its worshipers i.e. renovating.

And making it look like a classic Chinese temple instead of an Uyghur one? Cultural preservation in full force.

You haven’t addressed even how the language and cultural practices aren’t banned.

Wearing a long beard? Terrorism!

I’ve also seen a few independent Youtubers who visited Xinjiang and were specifically told they were not allowed to fly their drones in that area contrary to the rest of China and the area was very heavily guarded. Example www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHxzLogzqkU&t=2167s

carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml on 09 Sep 17:09 collapse

Classifying parts of religion you don’t like because you have to “combat terrorism” and assimilate your colonized population… where have I heard that one before…

Condoning radical parts of religion because forbidding them reminds of the cultural genocide that’s happening at home

And making it look like a classic Chinese temple instead of an Uyghur one? Cultural preservation in full force.

Imagine the headlines if left alone and the collapsing building kills a worshiper

Wearing a long beard? Terrorism!

The less radical Imam not falling into the western narrative in the video you linked to says that no religious repression is happening and denies that beards are banned. BBC provides no evidence and just points at a random ripped paper and says beards are banned because it says so there lol Instead you link me a video showing me how it even contradicts yourself. How do you like the timestamp, where the youtuber “sees 4-5 mosques just walking around the city center” and concludes “you can’t say that there aren’t any mosques here”. Which he concludes the same thing again further down the video you posted. youtu.be/dHxzLogzqkU?feature=shared&t=2085

How do you not see the contradiction, that you say cultural genocide, yet you can see arabic written all over the buildings in your own provided link? Poor guy couldnt fly his drone over the mosque. Have you tried flying a drone over a synagogue in any western country?

At least read the context I provided you earlier www.qiaocollective.com/education/xinjiang

Linkerbaan@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 18:19 collapse

The less radical Imam not falling into the western narrative in the video you linked to says that no religious repression is happening and denies that beards are banned.

everyone just randomly “quit because there’s jobs now” that makes total sense. And everyone cut their beards too just for fun. Let’s read your link and find out

www.qiaocollective.com/education/xinjiang

This is from your link:

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/b5c64543-6286-4e1f-8c03-b7b7847e7d41.png">

I believe this is the full document

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/98034221-48bb-4bd5-a704-c1775d590425.png">

Beards:

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/7ca57cf8-38ba-45f6-a081-802fdcd6a950.png">

Your link wants to reference article 14 which focuses on re-education but the preceding one doesn’t look great.

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/3e05d45a-1fa5-492e-acbc-d254c1061ac2.png">

So to summarize, according to your link the ‘comeback’ to Chinese law classifying people with beards as extremists… Is not that it’s not happening but that ‘they will be taught the correct beliefs’.

where the youtuber “sees 4-5 mosques just walking around the city center” and concludes “you can’t say that there aren’t any mosques here

Yes there are. The heavy military guarding around the area is what’s very noteworthy. If there’s a lot of dudes with guns arresting people who practice their religion that will intimidate people into not practicing it. Combine this with the knowledge of the “vocational camps” and it’s pretty obvious there’s something fishy going on.This is what I mean with gradual crackdown on religion.

The excuse that there’s still mosques flies about as well as saying Algeria still has mosques so France didn’t do cultural Genocide there. The CCP has been pretty open about wanting to crack down on religion as the Xi statement about Maxrism (also 2017 what a coincidence) suggested.

The BadEmpanada analysis video on Xinjiang was the best I have seen so far. Especially this testimony in which the “coerced acting” of China is pretty well highlighted

carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml on 09 Sep 18:41 collapse

You have to prove cultural genocide is happening, not the ban of beards. Put your efford there.

Yes there are. The heavy military guarding around the area is what’s very noteworthy.

Heavily militarized synagogues in western countries means that it’s with the knowledge of “the genocide in palestine” and pretty obvious there’s something fishy going on. This is what I mean with gradual crackdown on religion. Sorry I cannot take you serious here.

Your link wants to reference article 14 which focuses on re-education but the preceding one doesn’t look great

What’s your approach on how to deal with people that go stabbing people around them and are supported by your geopolitical rival?

BadEmpanada A single testimony

I’m going to take you even less serious now and choose not to continue this conversation anymore.

Linkerbaan@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 18:55 collapse

You have to prove cultural genocide is happening, not the ban of beards. Put your efford there.

You were the one claiming there was no beard ban because it’s a “vague piece of paper on a door”,

Another argument debunked another goalpost moved.

There’s multiple testimonies in the video you obviously didn’t watch. Of course it also includes the visits to the concentration camps which very clearly exist and are very real.

Far too much evidence to deny there’s nothing going on so a great point for you to pretend that the person which just spent time reading your worthless links is now ‘not serious’.

So now I have had three conversations with people denying the Uyghur Genocide and proceeding to ditch when presented with evidence.

carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml on 09 Sep 19:00 collapse

Another argument debunked another goalpost moved.

You haven’t addressed how you can see arabic everywhere, uyghur being an official language, and that there’s a shitton of mosques there and how it constitutes cultural genocide. If you culture is to stab people, then fuck your culture.

Far too much evidence to deny

Far little context taken into account

the person which just spent time reading your worthless links is now ‘not serious’.

No because if youd have looked at the “worthless” link you’d know that the primary sources BE provides are contextualized there already.

Linkerbaan@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 20:00 collapse

You haven’t addressed how you can see arabic everywhere, uyghur being an official language, and that there’s a shitton of mosques there and how it constitutes cultural genocide. If you culture is to stab people, then fuck your culture.

I did you even acknowledged the example of banning beards but then pretend like you weren’t given evidence.

No because if youd have looked at the “worthless” link you’d know that the primary sources BE provides are contextualized there already.

No there aren’t. They are just mentioned and then waived away with some non-sequitur that only people who don’t actually read it believe solves the issue.

I can confidently say you did not read or verify the material you linked because instead of denying the Genocide it just does a very poor attempt at justifying it.

carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml on 09 Sep 20:53 collapse

I did you even acknowledged the example of banning beards but then pretend like you weren’t given evidence.

I acknowledged it, by telling you to focus on proving cultural genocide in the first place. No, targeting bearded people that espouse violent Muslim interpretations of Islam in order to “correct” their beliefs to non violent interpretation does not constitute cultural genocide (even if wasnt fully informed on the targeting of ideologically violent bearded people. That maybe constituting racial profiling, but not cultural genocide)

No there aren’t.

There are like this source BE uses medium.com/…/breaking-down-the-bbcs-visit-to-hota…

denying the Genocide

Nothing to deny. You haven’t proved it.

Linkerbaan@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 21:27 collapse

No, targeting bearded people that espouse violent Muslim interpretations of Islam in order to “correct” their beliefs to non violent interpretation does not constitute cultural genocide

Imagine unironically calling everyone with a beard a knife stabbing terrorist to justify a Genocide. You are no better than the average Zionist.

carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml on 10 Sep 04:15 collapse

You can stop, I don’t think BE will notice you

DarkCloud@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 15:51 collapse

That vote was made in the Obama era. There’s a 35 billion dollar funding scheme for Israel that’s bin full swing.

Stopping it would require a lot of changes across multiple stratas of government and legal procedures.

… it’s not as simple as “the president” or “the party” can just stop a long term international set of contracts across industries and government agencies and departments.

The video “Rules for Rulers” by YouTuber CPGGrey covers some of this.

Linkerbaan@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 16:04 collapse

In this case the rulers are not listening to their constituents and being extremely corrupt. Meaning their constituents should stop supporting said rulers.

it’s not as simple as “the president” or “the party” can just stop a long term international set of contracts across industries and government agencies and departments.

It is called Leahy law, and the current president is actively violating the law by sending weapons to israel which uses them to commit war crimes.

DarkCloud@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 00:59 collapse

To play devil’s advocate, leahy law;

…prohibits the U.S. Department of State and Department of Defense from providing military assistance to foreign security force units that violate human rights with impunity.

But the fact that Israel is a democracy, suggests there are reprocessions, eg. Netenyahu could lose the election, and even face reprocessions from the next elected leader. So that’s not acting “with impunity”.

Israel has taken measures to make their genocide look considered (eg. Dropping flyers, naming bombing targets)… And to some extent, anyone wanting to claim they’re acting woth impunity (although it’s highly unlikely they’ll ever see reprocessions) - will have similar issues to those faced at Nuremberg, where the US didn’t want to invent laws to accuse them of being guilty of or having violated (as that would look like a kangaroo court, or future crime)…

…and unfortunately, due to the US having it’s own patchy human rights record, they avoid being a signatatory to international courts like The Hague.

So yeah, your claim wouldn’t be substantiated. It’s not that simple, you may as we’ll be claiming we can “reform our way our of Capitalism”… That’s a nice idea (as Leahy Law is), but they’re just not practically applicable.

Which is why I directed people to the “Rules for Rulers” video (by CPG grey), because it explains these basics to Socialists who basically live in these fantasy land conceptions of politics.

Of course fantasy land conceptions get upvotes, reality checks get downvotes, it’s a great system, designed to cause mental stagnation and “apathy through idealism” in the masses.

Linkerbaan@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 07:44 collapse

This is an israel problem not a Netanyahu problem.

Also israel is not a Democracy it is an Apartheid.

DarkCloud@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 14:12 next collapse

Both, it’s a Netenyahu problem and it’s attached to conspiracy theories around the assassination of the guy before him. The right wing captured cultural territory there that the progressive left have never been able to shift back, and it resulted in a lot of the population shifting to the right.

Linkerbaan@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 09:27 collapse

In any case “the leader might lose an election” is not what the “with impunity” clause entails.

Hitler also killed himself at the end of WW2, I doubt that could be used as an excuse to justify giving free weapons to the Nazis.

DarkCloud@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 14:37 collapse

The US was at war with Hitler, and has given other genocidal regimes weapons.

That’s not where my interest lays, it lays in practical, and applicable solutions.

You don’t have any, I don’t have any.

Linkerbaan@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 14:43 collapse

Of course it’s impossible to prosecute the government with the largest military in the world.

That’s not where my interest lays, it lays in practical, and applicable solutions.

I don’t think you are arguing with bad intentions. but the premise of playing devils advocate is about the legality of sending weapons to israel, not whether the people doing it can get away with it which is the more practical side.

Practically Biden can (and is required to) enforce Leahy law. Whether he follows the law is a different matter.

DarkCloud@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 16:48 collapse

Oh, if you’re just discussing things to play theoretical games, then I’m not interested. I play devils advocate to try to find practical means of intervention.

That’s okay, thanks anyways, bye.

DarkCloud@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 09:22 collapse

But also, if you’re trying to apply US law, then they don’t have to be a functional democracy - just recognized as one by the US.

So that’s a naive approach.

Deinonychusanti@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 12:45 next collapse

Heavily scratched liberal gets banned from hexbear for being a debate pervert and trying to start fights, immediately proceeds to call everyone there mentally ill

Arelin@lemmy.zip on 07 Sep 13:24 next collapse

Here’s the thread in question btw. The mods left up OP’s comments that had some semblance of effort.

OP claimed putler was trying to bring back the USSR or some shit here lmao. At least OP deleted it.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 13:54 next collapse

They also went on to equate Palestine with Israel and refused to take a pro-Palestinian stance.

Deinonychusanti@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 16:12 next collapse

this person needs serious help, and by help i mean <img alt="barbara-pit" src="https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/a37d97d4-adaf-4d3b-9590-57d3590bc268.png">

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 21:42 collapse

eliminating one or the other is agiast self determination, 2 state or die.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 21:52 next collapse

Nice to see you going mask-off and thinking Nazi Germany should have remained.

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 21:55 collapse

??? when the fuck did i say Jerusalem should’ve been under Germany control? are you insane? from all the denial of soviet genocide?

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 22:08 collapse

No, the bit where you said you don’t support the dissolution of fascist states.

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 08 Sep 10:07 collapse

??? well the israeli government is terrible yes.

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 06:23 collapse

States don’t have rights, humans have rights. An ethnostate is not compatible with human rights. The only solution is a single, multicultural Palestine.

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 08 Sep 10:11 collapse

i do agree with your point but there should be a triangle parliament system if a multicultural Palestine gets formed to discourage racism or something like it

TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 21:59 collapse

I mean, rebuilding the USSR is Putins historical justification for invading ukraine. It was a part of his whole rambling speech in the beginning.

And he was banned for saying that? Pft.

Psythik@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 16:04 next collapse

I’m not banned from there and I agree with OP. Those people need serious help.

Edit: I mean they think Donald Trump is a liberal FFS. Donald Fucking Trump.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 21:29 next collapse

I mean they think Donald Trump is a liberal FFS. Donald Fucking Trump

I mean, yes. Donald Trump generally supports the free market, individualist ideology of Liberalism, and is extremely pro Capitalism.

Liberalism doesn’t mean “left wing” or “center left.”

Trump is also a far-right populist, but falls under the umbrella of liberalism.

InternetUser2012@lemmy.today on 08 Sep 00:06 collapse

Lol Demential DonOLD is a fucking puppet who got his stage thanks to Russian interference. He’s whatever the highest bidder wants. Obviously Putin, the highest of bidders, wants him in so he can have his access to top secret documents restored and the supplies to Ukraine stopped.

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 06:21 collapse

He’s whatever the highest bidder wants

You are ascribing too much coherency and competence to Trump’s actions. The guy blew up the general who beat ISIS while he was on a peace mission in a third country, but called off the war just hours before the first strike because he learned there would be casualties. In a fucking war.

Dkarma@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 23:51 collapse

Dude…he used to be. Lol

Cornpop@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 16:51 collapse

What the fuck is a debate pervert? Yall are weird af to be following this dude over here and commenting on his posts and having your alt accounts or other weirdo friends upvote lol looks pathetic.

SSJMarx@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 18:00 collapse

Constantly going back and forth on technicalities rather than actually discussing an issue. I admit I’m guilty of it from time to time, but after I get banned from a community or an instance I don’t make a thread in a place where the people agree with me begging for validation.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 13:12 next collapse

To be clear, this is coming from you getting banned for being a debate-pervert after you claimed Putin invaded Ukraine to “reinstate the USSR” as a secret Commie and refused to take a pro-Palestinian stance, equating Palestinian resistance with a century of settler-colonial genocide.

I think it’s a bit terminally online to run away to a defederated instance to lick your wounds, rather than reflect on why being a debatebro is unhealthy.

TheRealKuni@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 13:26 next collapse

equivilating

I think the word you’re looking for is “equating.”

“Equivilating” is not a word.

“Equivocating” is, but it means to deceive without lying by creatively telling the truth, to seem you’re saying one thing while really saying something else. This is an art form if you play a lawful good face character and your DM says you aren’t allowed to lie.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 13:30 next collapse

Just woke up, corrected, haha. Thanks!

SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 17:02 collapse

This is an art form if you play a lawful good face character and your DM says you aren’t allowed to lie.

This is the real pro tip.

chaogomu@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 20:19 next collapse

Everyone knows Putin invaded Ukraine because he’s a dumbass dictator who started to believe his own propaganda. It’s the dictator trap. Putin surrounded himself with backstabbing yes men by literally killing anyone who wasn’t.

As to Palestinian resistance. I don’t think Hamas is a good resistance movement. For a whole host of reasons. Which is why the Israeli government has been propping them up since the 80s.

An unsympathetic resistance movement can do more to damage a cause than not having a movement at all.

From now until the ethnic cleansing is complete, Israel will call any resistance movement Hamas, regardless of their actual name or beliefs. I’m not sure how to fight that… I don’t think anyone really knows beyond screaming the truth everywhere we can.

It didn’t work in the 1920s in Europe. But maybe with the Internet… Likely not though.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 20:25 collapse

Everyone knows Putin invaded Ukraine because he’s a dumbass dictator who started to believe his own propaganda. It’s the dictator trap. Putin surrounded himself with backstabbing yes men by literally killing anyone who wasn’t.

Do you have any evidence of this? Could it be that there were economic factors at play, and rational actors, regardless of morality or immorality? This seems utterly vibe-based and lacks a materialist analysis, so I’d love evidence.

From now until the ethnic cleansing is complete, Israel will call any resistance movement Hamas, regardless of their actual name or beliefs. I’m not sure how to fight that… I don’t think anyone really knows beyond screaming the truth everywhere we can.

Hamas isn’t the only resistance group in Palestine, there are others such as the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. The key though is that Israel has been committing settler-colonial genocide for a century, oppressed peoples have a right to use violence against their oppressors, especially when non-violent means have tried and failed, and especially in the face of active genocide.

Equating Hamas to Israel equates resistance to genocide with genocide itself.

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 21:40 next collapse

what about the 10s of thousands of baltics sent to siberia? wasn’t that a genocide? or all the famine in Ukraine? or the invasion of Hungary and checkoslovaka after they implemented democratic reforms?

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 06:16 collapse

The transport of Baltic peoples, Tatars, Japanese, etc were ethnic cleansing, but not genocide because it didn’t seek to destroy those people. I don’t think you’ll find anyone defending those actions.

The famine in Ukraine was part of a wider crop failure of the grain-producing regions of the USSR. The role Soviet policy of distribution grain, reaction to soviet policy in the form of destruction of grain and livestock, and the reaction to that resistance all played is contested, but no serious historian argues that the USSR intended to bring about the destruction of the Ukrainian people.

Life And Terror In Stalin’s Russia, is a great book that is critical of the USSR, but with more nuance than the western narrative. Here’s a free PDF.

The invasion of Hungary

While the initial uprising was sparked by democratic reformers, it was quickly co-opted by fascists, as evidenced by the destruction of communist imagery and murder of Hungarian communists.

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 08 Sep 10:14 collapse

i have my own narrative as an estonian. and stop talking about fascists, hungary and spain were never going to be fascist nuclear powers.

chaogomu@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 21:54 collapse

There was no economic or rational factors. The only thing that makes a lick of sense is the irrational.

www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/…/627064/

vox.com/…/vladimir-putin-russia-ukraine-war-brian…

Those are a warm-up, but then you have the purges since the invasion began.

newyorker.com/…/the-purges-in-putins-shrinking-in…

Putin has sort of been the butt of jokes for years for killing anyone who looks at him funny. He’s a KGB stooge, who made his career out of backstabbing and paranoia. His entire inner circle were afraid to tell him the truth, because he would kill them if they did.

He’s never been “savvy”, he’s just been willing to kill as many people as necessary to secure his own power.

The classic authoritarian dictator who throws people out of windows for saying no. And whose vaulted military had body armor made of cardboard, because the corruption was so ingrained that every single level was accepting bribes and stealing shit.

I’m surprised that they’re still going, but Russia has shown the world that they’re a third rate military, at best.


As to Palestine. It doesn’t matter what the resistance movements call themselves now. Israel will just say they’re Hamas, and no one likes Hamas. There are good reasons not to like Hamas, they’re religious extremists who want to kill all Jews.

And for decades, Israel has funded Hamas behind the scenes, while coming down extra heavy on any other resistance movement. And now it’s all paid off for them because they can just claim that anyone they kill was actually Hamas.

timesofisrael.com/for-years-netanyahu-propped-up-…

washingtonpost.com/…/how-israel-helped-create-ham…

This tactic of creating the perfectly detestable opposition has been used in quite a few places. For example, Greenpeace gets a lot of money from oil company heirs. Specifically the Rockefeller family.

I doubt anyone from Hamas, or Greenpeace, ever took orders from the people giving them money. They were given the money with no strings attached, because they were already jackasses. The money just extended their reach.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 22:07 collapse

There are absolutely rational reasons for Russia to invade Ukraine.

Looking back to the dissolution and subsequent plundering of the USSR, there became a rising Bourgeoisie within the Russian Federation. Since there wasn’t already Imperialist infrastructure for the Russian Federation to exploit the Third World (large, monopoly and financial Capitalists with international footholds), Putin tried to join NATO and join hands with the rest of the Imperialist western nations, and take “their share” of the super-profits. This was denied, and thus began a long few decades of growing tensions between NATO and the Russian Federation.

Ukraine on the other hand has been increasingly militarized, with anti-Russian sentiments rising. NATO increased expansion against Russian requests, leading to Russia trying to forcibly demilitarize Ukraine.

Regardless of morals, there is a material basis for this conflict.

As for Palestine, again, the oppressed have the rights to use violence to free themselves, especially if non-violence hasn’t worked, and in the face of genocide.

chaogomu@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 00:48 next collapse

That’s some blatant Russian propaganda there. Blame NATO twice for Russian imperialism.

The “Russia had to invade a sovereign nation because they were talking about joining NATO to prevent Russia from invading them” logic has some holes to it.

The fact that Russia has invaded their neighbors 14 times since the end of the cold war tells you why one of their neighbors would want to join NATO.

Also, remember that time that Russia shot down a commercial airliner? The Ukrainians sure as hell do. That was the true beginning of the invasion, which is why Ukraine was in talks to join NATO.


And yes, people have the right to defend themselves. But the Israeli government has locked down the anti-terror propaganda, because Hamas is pretty vile as far as organizations go. It’s why Israel let Hamas grow and become powerful, and why the Israelis paid to keep Hamas in power for the last decade or so.

As long as Israel can point at Hamas, they have just enough of an excuse to claim their ethnic cleansing is actually just an anti-terror campaign.

Hamas is a full on terrorist organization, not that all terrorist organizations are bad. Or rather, there are some causes where a terrorist organization is the appropriate response. John Brown tried it. So did Nelson Mandela. But Hamas is a religious extremist terrorist organization. One that has distasteful views, and was sort of put in place by Israel for those views.

You see what I’m getting at here? Hamas is fucking evil, and Israel has mostly succeeded in making Hamas the face of Palestinian resistance against Israel.

I doubt many of the original leaders of Hamas are still alive, but that doesn’t matter either when Israel can just lie and say that whoever they kill is Hamas. It’s a bit maddening, and I doubt there’s an answer to it all except for the other Palestinian resistance groups to step up their social media game.

michaelmrose@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 05:32 collapse

Ukraine has been super militarized with anti-Russian sentiments rising since they illegally stole a part of their country in 2014 and started providing money, arms, vehicles, and soldiers to separatists premised on said separatists murdering their fellow citizens and providing a thin pretext for Russia ultimately taking more of Ukraine.

Given the profoundly destructive nature of any such conflict with Russia and the impossibility of winning or even surviving without a coalition of supporters there is zero chance of Ukraine ever starting a conflict with Russia itself.

Given the risk of nuclear war and the impossibility of pushing Ukraine to start such a conflict there was never any chance of NATO either starting such a conflict OR being able to start one by proxy.

It’s hard to argue that Russia had security concerns when the only person in a position to light this candle is themselves.

NATO was virtually entirely a mutual defense pact vs Russia in their previous incarnation as the USSR. Inducting Russia into NATO would only serve to give them veto power and influence on an org which virtually exists to defend against THEM! It makes no coherent sense nor would it somehow provide the Russians some share of “super profits” it would solely give them an opportunity to undermine NATO which is why Putin wanted it.

The material basis for stealing the Ukrainians country from them and murdering its children is that by doing so they gain access to tax payers, resources, people, strategic resources, land, fossil fuels etc. Based on what we know about their strategic planning we have every reason to believe they thought this would be an inexpensive and quick affair that would be concluded in a matter of days with minimal loss of life.

It is purely a function of avarice, stupidity, and immorality. It is no more complicated than asking why a burglar invaded a home and took the lives of people there when he just ended up leaving bloody himself. They did it because they thought it would profit them and because they thought they could get away with it.

Diva@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 10:10 collapse

NATO was virtually entirely a mutual defense pact vs Russia in their previous incarnation as the USSR.

This “defense pact” has invaded, bombed and destroyed many countries within only my lifetime, it’s a laughable statement unless your historical horizon is less than a decade.

Living in America it’s incredible to me how people I run into don’t even know the countries that their own government has invaded using its “defense pact”, or pay attention to people whose lives they’ve ruined, and thus can’t even understand why people see them as a threat.

TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 21:58 next collapse

The irony of being banned for being a “debatebro” in fucking hexbear of all places, where “debatebro” is just the zeitgeist.

Call it what it is, he like most others was banned for having differing beliefs than the chosen narrative there.

OmegaLemmy@discuss.online on 09 Sep 02:05 collapse

Please tell me what a debate bro is for the people who don’t know the terminology

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 09 Sep 10:11 collapse

Someone who goes fishing for fights online.

Blackmist@feddit.uk on 07 Sep 15:50 next collapse

Hates stuff the west does.

Loves stuff China and Russia do.

It’s the same stuff.

Cornpop@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 16:49 collapse

Haha too accurate

PugJesus@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 18:59 next collapse

HB enthusiasts coming here and trying to call me out achieves nothing besides proving my point

Yeah, you can always count on them to brigade.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 20:00 collapse

Yeah. They’ve been downvote bombing me since yesterday. And they were telling me I’m the one that needs to go back to reddit lol

Diva@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 21:56 collapse

Hexbear, famous for having down votes turned on. But yeah, you’re totally surrounded by secret hexbears all down voting you

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 23:05 next collapse

That’s ok. Instead of having a normal dialog or civil disagreement, they want to be cowards and try to bully or demean people that disagree with them. Those people that do that are honestly sad and I pity them

Cataphract@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 07:09 collapse

… what are you doing in this post? Should I feel sad and pity you?

Diva@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 09:57 collapse

I was trying to wrap my head around the guy complaining about the lack of civil disagreement, people bullying and demeaning while simultaneously posting a thread calling all the users on what’s one of the largest trans instances on lemmy “insane” in the title before walking it back in the body

think a little clarification is needed. No. I don’t actually think everyone there is insane.

Why make it the post title then unless you’re fishing for negative engagement?

imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one on 07 Sep 23:52 collapse

Lemmy, famous for not allowing alt accounts 😅

This is why people don’t like hexbear, because they consistently try to gaslight and use disingenous arguments such as this. How are you disputing the fact that OP is getting downvoted by hexbears right now? That’s insane.

Diva@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 00:16 collapse

Gaslighting? Disingenuous? You’re the one asserting that anyone down voting must be a hexbear alt, by virtue of the fact that nobody could possibly disagree unless they were already a hexbear user.

It’s just a bit circular and not disprovable anyways. Maybe the admins should just check the logs and ban everyone who’s down voted so you can rest easy. Wouldn’t want to have any authoritarians using lemmy.

imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one on 08 Sep 01:12 collapse

I never asserted that “anyone downvoting must be a hexbear alt”. There you go again, misrepresenting my point just to feel like you’re winning.

I’m quite sure that non-hexbears are downvoting OP also. But that wasn’t what you said, was it? You could have said that originally, but instead you decided to mock OP and act like he’s crazy and there’s no way he is getting downvoted by hexbear users, which is disingenous and lame.

You know what you’re doing, I don’t need to explain your own bad faith tactics to you.

Diva@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 01:45 next collapse

Just quoting you:

How are you disputing the fact that OP is getting downvoted by hexbears right now?

Between 2 and n “hexbears” (understood to mean “humans afflicted with hexbear mind virus using other servers”) are behaving in some coordinated way. You were pretty clearly implying that it’s some conspiracy rather than simply other users disagreeing with you.

I’m sure there are people who primarily use hexbear and use alts, some of them may even be downvoting you.

I took your assertion to its ridiculous conclusion because it’s a ridiculous thing to be complaining about in the first place, as in not a real problem.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 09 Sep 00:21 next collapse

Not to be a dick, but it seems like you guys are on the same side, so why are you arguing?

Diva@lemmy.ml on 09 Sep 00:33 collapse

I’m honestly not sure what to make of this comment?

If this is what you think agreeing looks like then I pity the people in your life.

imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one on 17 Sep 15:53 collapse

Between 2 and n “hexbears” (understood to mean “humans afflicted with hexbear mind virus using other servers”) are behaving in some coordinated way. You were pretty clearly implying that it’s some conspiracy rather than simply other users disagreeing with you.

Lol what are you on about? People who use hexbear (i.e. hexbears) share similar traits, interests, and behaviors. They use hexbear because they fit in on hexbear, and in order to fit in on hexbear you need to pass an extensive series of ideological purity tests, which result in the homogeneity and cult-like behavior that occurs.

Hexbear is quite explicit about this, they don’t want anyone with any sort of divergent political views on their server. They clearly revel in “dunking on libs” by chain downvoting and harassing people when they say things that the hexbear hive mind disagrees with. And yet always claim innocence when their obvious brigading is called out, as you are currently doing.

It is a real problem for everyone who’s not a hexbear, because it means that we can’t have sane, civil conversations about certain political issues on Lemmy, because CCP apologists and edgelord larping teenage “leftists” constantly butt in and derail the discussion with their potent combination of ignorance and self righteousness.

Diva@lemmy.ml on 17 Sep 16:25 collapse

Sounds like you’re the one with the cult-like devotion, but sure whatever you say officer

They clearly revel in “dunking on libs” by chain downvoting and harassing people when they say things that the hexbear hive mind disagrees with. And yet always claim innocence when their obvious brigading is called out, as you are currently doing.

They don’t even have down votes turned on, unless you’re saying that their users are going out of their way to make alt accounts specifically to downvote.

This looks like projection as you are the one who seems to think that down votes are some shield against wrong think and they don’t seem to care about them at all.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 09 Sep 00:22 collapse

I personally feel like you guys are on the same side, so please don’t argue

Edit: my bad. I was wrong. The other person got upset because I thought you two were under agreement. They’re gone from my post now 😁

flashgnash@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 21:08 next collapse

I love that without fail every single person in this thread defending hexbears is from ml with the same pronoun tag format every single hexbear seems to have

Almost like they’re hexbear alts or something

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 21:14 next collapse

Weird right? I love how they think everyone is as obsessed with fake internet points as them. Some of them seriously need to talk to people in real life

the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works on 07 Sep 22:20 collapse

What? Why? Who i say who in their right mind says this in a post absolutely soaking in their own tears? I think the complete batshit audacity is what i find most entertaining about you.

Diva@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 21:54 next collapse

Before I get accused of being a hexbear alt, I only added them after I saw that they were in common use due to hexbear posters showing up in my /all. We did actually start mandating pronoun tags for people participating in /c/transgender -despite the fact that some of the admins are resistant at the instance level- because it seems to work well in the trans spaces on hexbear for fostering a respectful environment.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 01:44 collapse

That’s cool, bud. And I’m doing my best to not criticize the individual person, but there are a few people that make souring the reputation of all on HB

Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de on 08 Sep 13:47 collapse

Couldn’t that be said of any and all groups? A few bad posters has soured me on the lemm.ee instance, but would it be logical or fair or me to assume that a few bad experiences reflects an entire group?

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 16:03 collapse

Not wrong, but a few bad apples can ruin the whole bunch

mathemachristian@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 06:15 next collapse

In my case my hexbear account is an alt of my lemm.ee account

Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de on 08 Sep 13:35 collapse

I am not from ML nor do I have a Hexbear alt of any sort, but I defend Hexbear’s right to be different. They seem to be a younger group of anti-capitalists so I find their perspectives interesting.

Edit: I am still somewhat new to Lemmy, so maybe there is some history with Hexbear that I am ignorant of, but until I see it for myself, I enjoy their content and will continue to support Hexbear.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 14:03 next collapse

I am still somewhat new to Lemmy, so maybe there is some history with Hexbear that I am ignorant of

Hexbear is a 4 year old community, it drastically predates the Reddit Exodus, and only started federating with other instances around 10 months ago. Those 3 years of self-sustainability created a unique culture that is at odds with the liberal instances on Lemmy, like Lemmy.world.

OpenStars@discuss.online on 08 Sep 21:51 collapse

I would defend anyone’s right to be different as well. However, that’s not the case here - you said it yourself, you really are missing a huge history between Hexbear.net and… well, everyone else across the Fediverse (and highly ironically, as such they would ruthlessly make fun of you, for speaking without knowing - i.e. you are someone who would defend them, but not vice versa). They poke fun at liberals, conservatives, anyone from the West, etc., and the issue isn’t so much their right to exist or be different, but the need for the rest of the Fediverse to spread their message out in the same manner as all the other messages, which are governed by an entirely different set of policies and code of conduct.

I hope you will agree with me that the rights to do a school shooting, or the right to block someone else’s access to medical care… is really no “right” at all. That is to say that they can be however they like, but the moment that they federate with the rest of the world, it crosses over into our rights, whether we want to receive what they offer or not, and even more so to promote & share it to our own users.

But don’t take my word for it: visit e.g. ChapoTrapHouse or the_dunk_tank and see for yourself. Or here’s an example post, where they took a poll on which other instances to deferate from, then promptly ignored the results that said no and defederated from them anyway:-P lemm.ee for instance had 41 votes to keep it and only 4 for it to go, but despite the additional order of magnitude and some passionate responses defending the former (e.g. “But man we should at least stay federated with lemm.ee, that instance’s admin has been very reasonable and it hasn’t caused much trouble at all; nothing that banning any troublemakers can’t fix.”), they defederated from it anyway. And the reasons stated to keep it are also informative - basically so that they can proselytize to them, though notice the distinct lack of wanting to converse with them as equals. And that is just one instance, among the very few that will even consider federation with hexbear.net to begin with. Also, to balance that out, read lemm.ee’s policy on federation with hexbear.net - notice how 100% polar opposite it is, not just in terms of facts but of behaviors.

There is also programming.dev’s response, tldr version: “Hexbear defederated from us so to prevent one way conversations I have added them to our blocklist as well. If the hexbear admins decide to unblock us I can do the same”… followed in the very next post by “It is very likely we will be federating with Hexbear again…” - which despite the fact that that did not end up happening (as of September 8, 2024 I can see hexbear.net on their instances list, make sure to switch the tab at the top to “Blocked Instances”), I want to point out how extremely friendly other instance admins continue to try to be, towards them, though this behavior seems to have never been rewarded in return. And it’s not just these two instances - there are so very many, here’s another at sh.itjust.works, where they thought long & hard about it (mind you this is an EXTREMELY permissive server, chock-full of reasonable-minded people, which you’ll see as/if you read the other posts in that community), and somewhat shockingly seemed ready to do the defederation, but before they could, once again hexbear.net preemptively did it first, thus making the issue moot.

In short, they know exactly how they are - and many people routinely flee from it to spread elsewhere in an attempt to get away from the extremely heavy-handed authoritarian moderation/admin practices. When you tolerate the intolerant though…

<img alt="graphic describing the paradox of tolerating intolerance" src="https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:1358/1*ATmZGLrYSzIWjBZm4hGiqQ@2x.jpeg">

If you enjoy LGBTQIA+ content, it is everywhere, e.g. the variety of blahaj’s that exist - the most popular of which is lemmy.blahaj.zone, with the highest number of users (and to reveal my own bias, I’ve never seen anything written from their admin, Ada, that I have not thoroughly enjoyed reading - if I could follow accounts on the Fediverse, this is one of a mere handful of people across the entire world that I think I would do that for:-). Similarly with “different”/odd content - we love being different here on the Fediverse:-) - and again with left-leaning content (in fact people that are not left-leaning are quite rare).

But I advise to steer well clear of bigots. Except of course to learn about the situation - definitely check it out,

[deleted] on 10 Sep 10:07 collapse
.
archchan@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 21:14 next collapse

I was going to block them and lemmygrad at first but decided not to and instead tried to understand what all these people were about.

Now I’m a communist, have a hammer and sickle, live in China, and my favorite color is red. Death to America comrades! Get fucked libs /s

Seriously though, they’re not anymore insane than us. Maybe just a bunch of drunken commies at a bar who don’t really bother to distance themselves from the subjects of a century of red scare propaganda. In any case, it’s worth keeping an open mind and engaging in good faith.

Though as leftist as I personally am and have become in time, I’m not going to call anyone comrade or start using hammer and sickle imagery except in the context of history lol. Libs can still get fucked though.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 21:32 next collapse

Though as leftist as I personally am and have become in time, I’m not going to call anyone comrade or start using hammer and sickle imagery

For now… mwahahahahaha!

the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works on 07 Sep 21:58 collapse

The PLAN™ is working comrade

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 23:01 collapse

The difference is is that you’re sensible. I got absolutely nothing against that despite socio-political ideology. I appreciate that you know that your way of living isn’t or shouldn’t be everyone else’s way of living

TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 22:06 next collapse

They’re leftists. Like actual leftists, some of whom subscribe to the idea that capitalism can only be overcome through violence.

There’s a lot of “well if it’s our authoritarian it’s ok”

My real beef with them is the same as my beef with .Ml and Lemmygrad, little baby mods and admins that hit you with the instance wide ban for disagreeing with their opinions

More egregious is getting banned for pointing out the admins suck

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 22:59 next collapse

That’s not abnormal. Supporting authoritarian and totalitarian regimes means they themselves are authoritarian or totalitarian and just haven’t been able properly exemplify the authority they feel they deserve

SSJMarx@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 00:00 next collapse

the authority they feel they deserve

Facists argue that a certain group deserves authority, communists argue precisely the opposite, that the current regime with authority doesn’t deserve it and it should be apportioned equally and democratically instead. Because you live in a world where 99% of the media is controlled by the capitalists, you have been conditioned since birth to believe that every single movement of the people was actually a movement of a small group of elites, and that the countries that are currently exclusively controlled by their elites are in some way democratic.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 00:20 next collapse

First, I see you disagree, and thank you for expressing your disagreement in a respectful way.

Now, with that being said, what evidence do you have that your media is no different?

And please understand I’m not being sarcastic or playing a game. I am legitimately curious of your perspective. I really wish to understand your perspective. If any other person tries to treat you like crap, I’ll do my best to keep them from being shitty to you. Please feel free to explain your ideology in a respectful way and I will do my best to protect you from ridicule as well

Edit: also if I misunderstood what you’re saying, please say so and I’ll correct myself

el_bhm@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 01:33 collapse

There is also a bunch of books and historical records that point to the same conclusions.

But, sure, backhanded invectives that someone is brainwashed and stupid will sure convince people otherwise.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 01:46 collapse

Who said stupid?

Edit: I changed it because it was me assuming. I don’t want anyone to feel stupid. If someone called you stupid in my post, point them out and I’ll take care of it (at least in my post)

Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de on 08 Sep 13:55 collapse

Considering how the US’s CIA will infiltrate leftist groups to undermine and break those groups up, would that make the US an authoritarian state? And if someone passively enables authoritarianism through complacency then does that not make them authoritarians by default?

Read up on Operation Gladio if you want a peak at how deeply fascist / authoritarian the US truly is: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 16:02 collapse

I am already aware of the CIA’s fuckery. It’s no different than what the KGB was. They claim(ed) counter intelligence, but ultimately, their job is/was to destabilize to create political advantage. Career liars every last one of them

TachyonTele@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 23:23 next collapse

They seem more like edgy teenagers cosplaying more than being anything like ‘actual leftists’.

TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 23:42 next collapse

…yeeeaahhh….

SSJMarx@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 23:55 collapse

I’m pretty sure the average age on HB is mid-late twenties.

TachyonTele@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 00:26 collapse

It can take some people a longer time to mature than others.

Robaque@feddit.it on 07 Sep 23:33 next collapse

Are there no anarchists on hexbear?

TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 23:42 next collapse

Anarchists only exist to the degree their privilege allows them to feel like they have no need for any sort of authority.

I’m sure there are some there though, as long and they bring the right flavor of kool aid

Robaque@feddit.it on 08 Sep 02:14 collapse

How are you defining authority? My understanding is it’s specifically referring to “power over”; via implicit/explicit coercion, threat, manipulation, and so on. I don’t see why opposition to such uses of power, and the desire to build alternative systems which don’t rely on such means, has to be a negative or “naive” or “unrealistic” thing.

zinguszna@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 21:37 collapse

Contrary to the other guy’s made up assertions - yes, Hexbear has many anarchists, and they are explicitly welcomed as there’s a heavy focus on left unity over purity.

Dkarma@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 23:47 next collapse

Not defending ml but I can see how if you were born and raised in say Vietnam or China or had family members killed by NATO how you could see the USA as an imperialist hypocrite of a country.

What I don’t get at all is how those people hold up fucking China as a bastion of human rights and ignore uighur (sp) genocide etc. But I guess it’s the same as ppl in the US excusing Israel’s genocide of Palestine.

Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 04:47 collapse

The US is an imperialist hypocrite of a country. Like that is just a damn fact. As you point out though, the issues leftists, not in these spaces, have with places like hexbear, and ml, is the fact that they back authoritarian regimes like China. China who is in the process of the US playbook of economic imperialism with their BRI. They are committing a genocide, they are exploiting much poorer countries, to hold them in economic dependency, and they are discussing annexing land they do not own any longer, and haven’t for a long time now. No I am not talking about Taiwan.

They are making so many similar moves to the US post WWII, and have an economy that is dependent on allowing capitalism, to the point that they have a billionaire class second only to the US. While the US is growing its police/surveillance state, China is leagues ahead on that one. The big thing China doesn’t have, is something similar to the massive global infrastructure the US developed to be able to deploy, and supply, its military in a time frame measured in hours. China is trying to develop something along these lines, but it has the US/NATO super structure all ready in place, it will have to, at least partially, displace. This will not be easy.

Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 08 Sep 04:28 collapse

Tankies aren’t leftists.

TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 05:07 collapse

Strictly speaking they are leftist, just extreme in a lot of ways. it’s the authoritarian aspect of it that I dislike.

meowgenau@programming.dev on 08 Sep 06:33 collapse

In my mind, the idea of left politics is to democratize society as much as possible. Any type of Authoritarianism goes against that, including the idea of a single party with a single leader. It’s anti-democratic, and therefore does not fit into the category of leftist politics, even if they call themselves left. No racist is gonna call himself racists. And fashists neither.

zinguszna@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 21:34 collapse

Then you agree with many hexbears. As well as there being plenty of anarchists, most people there believe in some kind of fundamental democratisation at multiple levels, rather than a single election with two parties and very manufactured dynamics every 2-4 years.

meowgenau@programming.dev on 09 Sep 19:32 collapse

Not sure what you’re trying to say, honestly. Democratic values == evil communism?

OmegaLemmy@discuss.online on 07 Sep 22:09 next collapse

I don’t mind communism. I do mind advocating for Russia, in a war where they are clearly the aggressor, and harassing then moving to harass the same left wing for not being as radical or as pro-russian and deluding themselves with false beliefs that they are alone and no one is left wing other than them

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 22:57 next collapse

Totally agree with you. During the issue , there were some people that had a backhanded way of asking what i meant when I said that Russia had no reason to invade Ukraine. So I said that Putin was trying to get his glorious USSR back. I wasn’t being literal, but the past 20 years shows that he has been trying to annex states that were previously under the USSR or at the very least keeping extremely close, controllable ties with them. I got ridiculed and belittled without further request of clarification. And I think it’s because they aren’t interested or they are under the Russian propaganda machine.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 23:05 next collapse

I got ridiculed and belittled without further request of clarification.

Do you have any evidence of Putin wishing to reinstate the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics? Why is Putin moving in a Capitalist direction, rather than Socialist? Why is the conflict specifically centered around regions of Ukraine, not the entirety, and why Ukraine specifically? Do you believe history to be decided by Great Men, or by Material Conditions?

Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 04:34 collapse

This person is saying Putin wants the territory back, not the government system. They even say the statement was hyperbolic.

Objection@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 06:47 collapse

Now they say that. They also lied and said that they weren’t asked any clarifying questions, when the linked comment proves that they very clearly were. They’re just trying to backtrack their unreasonable claims after the fact to make the response they got seem more disproportionate.

OmegaLemmy@discuss.online on 09 Sep 02:01 collapse

Or is clarifying further after being asked a question about it. That seems to be the most natural result, no?

TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 23:44 next collapse

He also pretty much said as much during his initial ramblings during the invasion- that ukraine and other former Soviet states are rightfully a part of Russia.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 23:55 collapse

But in their eyes, I’m the crazy, illiterate, stupid lib

TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 00:30 collapse

And yaknow, I wouldn’t even mind being viewed that way. It’s the shitty moderation style I will mock endlessly.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 00:35 collapse

Agreed

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 14:31 collapse

You can’t deliver garbage writing to communists and expect positive results. The standard of semantics and nuance are set by socio-economic authors predominantly from the mid-to-late nineteenth century. Prerequisite to even speaking is a comprehensive understanding of at least The Conquest of Bread. One is expected to have the ability to segregate content from presentation and ideology from means of implementation. It’s as if you walked into university dynamics and poorly presented an algebra-based approach to a single body problem.

In certain forums, unless I’m very well-informed about a topic, I’ve learned to shut the fuck up unless asking questions, and to ask them with humility. In communist forums, which always stress education, I consistently receive high quality answers.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 14:56 next collapse

In certain forums, unless I’m very well-informed about a topic, I’ve learned to shut the fuck up unless asking questions, and to ask them with humility.

This is a core principle in Communist organization. “No investigation, no right to speak.” As a consequence, discussion tends to be better-informed in my experience.

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 15:16 collapse

Yes.

If I invest effort into figuring it out for myself and demonstrate that effort in the quality of my questions then nearly every teacher will at least match my investment. In the US teachers are so starved for good students that one-on-one education is free, from philosophy professors to diesel mechanics. I don’t even need be past the “nonsense” stage, only recognize my status and ask what pieces of the puzzle I’m missing.

edit: fixed a change from first to third person for clarity

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 16:11 next collapse

It seems to me you’re under the belief that they can say and believe whatever they want without criticism, and they shouldn’t be allowed to be criticized. Also, I see you have used the phrase “neolib,” so your beliefs are probably more in line with theirs than mine are. Of course, you’re not going to be criticized. However, I do have the right to critique the approach with their criticism. The short-and-skinny of what I observed is that they can dish it out, but can’t take it. It’s irrational and a very closed off way if thinking. If they want to be talked to and about in a certain way, then they themselves need to do the same

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 16:16 collapse

You delivered nonsense without even considering semantic. You felt entitled to others figuring it out for you. And, you were rejected due to your lack of effort.

I’ll now reject you for gaslighting me about your comments, which I’ve read, and the follow up strawman.

It’s simply not good enough. I don’t care why. But, I know you’ve nothing to contribute but practice material for identifying logical fallacy.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 16:21 collapse

Well thank you letting me live rent free in your head. You wasted your mental energy by coming here and saying that. And you have proved nothing besides exactly what I said. You didn’t come here to get an understanding of me, you came here to try and call me out.

So do you feel better about yourself? You holding your head up higher now?

zinguszna@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 21:28 collapse

My guy, this is a wild attempt a retort, given this entire thread was so you could come call Hexbears out, not to get any understanding.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 21:40 collapse

My friend, I don’t give a shit

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 08 Sep 18:23 collapse

Jerking communist doctrine while ignoring historic facts is indeed their with "what about capitalism" MO tiring.

Yeah the west sucks but they are winning the battle for now. Pretending like communist Revolution is the better route over structural reforms is also unstated theme.

Which leads me to believe that they are bad faith actors.

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 18:43 collapse

Communist revolution because capitalism has failed as predicted is the primary and public point of community unification for hexbear. Your assertions are laughable.

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 08 Sep 18:46 collapse

It is definitely failing lol but idea that some strong man is going to come to save us from the current strong men is laughable ;)

Also, foundational text only ID'ed the problem, it never provided a solution. Tankie larping leninst or Maoist is straight up bad faith actor from perspective of the doctrine since it has proven to be ineffective as executed by their respective "thinkers"

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 21:17 next collapse

It is definitely failing lol but idea that some strong man is going to come to save us from the current strong men is laughable ;)

When you’ve definitely read theory

zinguszna@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 21:27 collapse

I’m not convinced you’ve read or have a basic understanding of any foundational text, based on your assertions here.

InternetUser2012@lemmy.today on 07 Sep 23:54 collapse

Welp, that’s a ban

TypicalHog@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 23:27 next collapse

I blocked hex just days after finding out about lemmy and registering. Some super crazy shit going on there.

Diva@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 09:16 collapse

They just let the hogs shit on balls then they photograph them and crop them into little emoji, don’t ask me why I’m not an anthropologist

njm1314@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 04:56 next collapse

I wouldn’t know I blocked it immediately.

greywolf0x1@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 06:40 collapse

And nothing of value was lost to the HexBear instance.

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 15:51 collapse

You guys are somewhat still mad that the censorship of defederation has cut you off from an influx of newcomers to influence. And your tears are absolutely delicious.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 15:53 collapse

Hexbear has been around for 4 years, unfederated. They only started slowly federating around 10 months ago.

At least try to be honest.

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 15:55 collapse

Yeah, and they’re mad that the sane fediverse didn’t let them spread. That was the point. Your message is not a gotcha 😁

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 15:58 collapse

They aren’t mad though, they enjoy the instances they are federated with and are happy they defederated sh.itjust.works and that Lemmy.world “pre-emptively as a last resort” defederated them before even federating.

Having a dedicated Leftist space without constant liberalism is nice.

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 16:01 collapse

I can understand how having you own space is enjoyable, but you won’t convince me that you don’t care that your influence has been contained. Otherwise you wouldn’t feel the need to defend your instance so hard here, going as far as brigading other communities en masse?

You want anyone to believe you don’t care about being deplatformed? Stop acting like you actually care.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 16:04 collapse

My Lemmy.ml account is my older account, I’m defending Hexbear from misinformation right-wingers are spreading.

It isn’t “deplatforming” if Hexbear has always been self-sufficient and started platforming with other instances.

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 16:07 collapse

It is, because they tried federating and they were denied access.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 16:09 collapse

The platform was never there, lmao. It isn’t deplatforming. Hexbear has a democratic federating process that takes longer.

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 16:11 collapse

And you guys won’t reach any mainstream audience to spread your bile. Sorry!

pyrflie@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 06:46 next collapse

You’re still connected to Hexbear? They are all trolls.

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 07:06 next collapse

These pathetic foxes are pissed they’ve been neutralized by defederation. They’re mad that the contagion has been contained. That real lefties, even communists don’t take them seriously.

These guys aren’t fooling anyone. The online left doesn’t need their rotten discourse, and they don’t belong there.

It’s just 4chan cosplaying communism. Truly despicable.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 15:56 collapse

These pathetic foxes are pissed they’ve been neutralized by defederation.

Hexbear has been around for 4 years, unfederated. It wasn’t until 10 months ago that they started slowly federating. At least try to be honest.

That real lefties, even communists don’t take them seriously.

Who determines what a “real lefty,” or a “real Communist,” if not Communists who regularly read theory, talk about it, and post memes that require understanding theory to even get?

It’s just 4chan cosplaying communism. Truly despicable.

Do you genuinely believe people would put in that much effort to meme amongst themselves something they don’t agree with?

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 16:03 collapse

Oh, they do agree with the imagery. Not so much with the actual left-wing values. Which is why I used the word “cosplay”.

Leftism isn’t just aesthetics, folks. It’s not enough to just hate american imperialism.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 16:05 collapse

On what bounds do you say that? If they read Leftist theory, advocate for Leftism, and attack Imperialism and Capitalism, then they are Leftists.

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 16:06 collapse

No, because substituting one imperialism with another one you like more means you never understood any leftist theory to begin with.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 16:08 collapse

In what manner does Hexbear advocate for expanding predatory IMF loans to the Global South, and exporting machinery and industrial Capital directly to the source of the Raw Materials so as to over-exploit the Global South by directly owning these sources of production?

FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 16:10 collapse

You guys can’t help yourselves. Anyone interested can read the Nazbear slip-ups in this thread. You don’t even to do any hardcore research.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 16:12 collapse

So, nothing, gotcha.

Allero@lemmy.today on 08 Sep 09:35 next collapse

“HB enthusiasts coming here and trying to call me out achieves nothing besides proving my point”

Without taking any sides, saying some group is insane and then saying that them lashing back “proves your point” is beyond stupid.

Like, of course they will, what else do you expect them to do? Sit and politely agree?

We should stop with this kind of BS in any sort of debate. Groups will protect themselves, and will not get polite to those who throw slurs at them; that’s natural, normal and speaks nothing about their average behavior.

This never proves any point and is nothing but a dirty rhetorical device aimed to shut your opposition up and make them seem irrelevant. This is not part of any possible healthy conversation.

Also, post is not a genuine question.

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 14:16 next collapse

Also, post is not a genuine question.

I’ll answer yours in good faith.

what else do you expect them to do? Sit and politely agree?

Internally reach consensus to segregate themselves, then brigade the fediverse whole with content that allowed the majority to believe it was their choice.

Because such actions are well outside of status quo want for bandwagon validation they’re by definition “insane” and “unexpected”. But, the hexbear community is well aware that the majority is better off not yet knowing what they believe. Many expected such actions as it was an obvious moral and ethical imperative that lacked internal leadership support.

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 14:50 collapse

Internally reach consensus to segregate themselves, then brigade the fediverse whole with content that allowed the majority to believe it was their choice.

Hexbear was the only lemmy for 4 years, over that time their code base diverged, it took a few months to make federation possible again. There was never a consensus on whether HB should be segregated, a lot of users opposed federation over concerns about harassment or just valuing one of the few leftist communities. The end result was slow federation, with users suggesting specific instances to federate with, and instances getting defederated if the admins failed to take adequate action against transphobes/chasers.

hexbear community is well aware that the majority is better off not yet knowing what they believe

Half this thread is hexbears and others telling people exactly what they believe about random topics. If you doubt that, Hexbear has 4 years of history and a search function. You can even find the struggle sessions where they came to the conclusions I mentioned previously.

Many expected such actions as it was an obvious moral and ethical imperative that lacked internal leadership support.

What are you talking about?

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 15:03 collapse

Hexbear was the only lemmy for 4 years, over that time their code base diverged, it took a few months to make federation possible again… a lot of users opposed federation concerns about harassment or just valuing one of the few leftist communities. The end result was slow federation, with users suggesting specific instances to federate with, and instances getting defederated if the admins failed to take adequate action against transphobes/chasers.

Now there’s two of us that are speaking truth.

Half this thread is hexbears and others telling people exactly what they believe about random topics.

Are they? That wouldn’t be thematically consistent with their years of telling others what they’d like to hear for their entertainment. Their culture is selfish in that way.

There was never a consensus on whether HB should be segregated

There was never formal consensus in that leadership repeatedly denied the vote, favoring a granular, instance-by-instance approach.

What are you talking about?

An organized, grassroots movement that employed questionable means to force the wisest decision upon leadership and everyone else.

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 15:30 collapse

That wouldn’t be thematically consistent with their years of telling others what they’d like to hear for their entertainment.

What?

There was never formal consensus in that leadership repeatedly denied the vote, favoring a granular, instance-by-instance approach.

Here’s the vote that approved the granular instance-by-instance approach

An organized, grassroots movement that employed questionable means to force the wisest decision upon leadership and everyone else.

Are you describing the consensus building and struggle sessions as “forcing the wisest decision on everyone”?

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 15:47 collapse

Here’s the vote that approved the granular instance-by-instance approach

And then what happened? It seems like you were present for awhile but perhaps not in the trenches, through the OpSec, and to the end.

What?

Indeed.

Are you describing the consensus building and struggle sessions as “forcing the wisest decision on everyone”?

Q: Why did hexbear brigade the fediverse?

A: Certainly for the lulz. /s

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 15:57 collapse

And then what happened?

People nominated instances here and when/if people had concerns, there’d be a megathread discussing/voting on defederation.

Q: Why did hexbear brigade the fediverse? A: Certainly for the lulz. /s

What?

SirDerpy@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 16:11 collapse

You’ve forgotten to mention the minority that did not agree and how strongly they believed they were correct. You’ve seemingly not considered that democracy’s best case scenario is mediocrity.

We will not be led by or stagnate upon popularity among the lumpen. Democracy be damned when faced with such a threat.

ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip on 09 Sep 18:53 collapse

If someone calls me insane, the response that proves them wrong is a reasonable, chill response at most. The actual sane thing to do is ignore them or make a joke about the claim.

Just like if someone calls me weird, the response that proves I’m not weird is to say, “hahaha, sure, whatever” or “so what?” The response that would prove their point is along the lines of, “I’m not weird, you’re weird” or “they’re not calling me weird, they’re calling my associate weird.”

Allero@lemmy.today on 10 Sep 04:41 collapse

Ignoring or shrugging off shit people say about you may actually not be a viable long-term strategy.

Contrary to what many of us have been taught, this actually allows others to reinforce their views about you inside their echo chambers.

That’s not to mention it’s simply not great to hear that stuff said about you or the group you care about, and the longer this drags on, the more toxicity, alienation, and spite inevitably accumulates. None of us are immune to this, and it’s not insane to be hostile to those who are hostile to you.

ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip on 09 Sep 18:57 collapse

I think HB and some of the other groups are mostly trolls or Russian, Chinese, Iranian, North Korean, or aligned operatives trying to gas up trolls or wannabe trolls.

There are definitely some well meaning Americans and others who get suckered into the bullshit tornado that is those sites. They are definitely worth saving if we can. But it’s hard. They ban and block anyone with a dissenting voice no matter how calmly presented.

EABOD25@lemm.ee on 09 Sep 20:18 next collapse

I see it as the neonazi movement in the US in late 90s and early 2000s. They want to be edgy, but don’t have a significant structure to actually do anything important. Around 2006 I ended up stealing a knife from a neonazi that came in to the restaurant that I worked at. It was a Mexican restaurant btw lol

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 11 Sep 14:29 collapse

I think HB and some of the other groups are mostly trolls or Russian, Chinese, Iranian, North Korean, or aligned operatives trying to gas up trolls or wannabe trolls.

Do you have any evidence of that at all? Why would Hexbear remain as an isolated instance for 4 years then, only beginning federation in the last year?

ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip on 11 Sep 16:21 collapse

Is your question why a propaganda operation focused on disrupting or presidential elections would “go live” 18-ish months before the presidential election?

And are you asking if I have specific evidence that they’re trolls? Or that the governments I’ve listed have troll farms? Or that specifically HB is specifically rife with trolls from this governments’ farms? Because I definitely don’t have specific evidence. Just the historical evidence of (attempted) general interference from those countries in our previous elections.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml on 11 Sep 16:29 collapse

Is your question why a propaganda operation focused on disrupting or presidential elections would “go live” 18-ish months before the presidential election?

If your assumption that Hexbear is just bots and propaganda was true, why would it remain isolated for 4 years, with posters talking only to each other? 4 years of training? And, correction on your part, it started federating 10 months ago, not 18.

It makes more sense for these to be people with genuine views and aligned interests.

And are you asking if I have specific evidence that they’re trolls? Or that the governments I’ve listed have troll farms? Or that specifically HB is specifically rife with trolls from this governments’ farms? Because I definitely don’t have specific evidence. Just the historical evidence of (attempted) general interference from those countries in our previous elections.

So you don’t, you’re just accusing people you disagree with of being propaganda agents and bots, despite them existing for 4 years in pure isolation. That’s silly.

ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip on 11 Sep 23:20 collapse

Those poor people spending time only on HB for four years, never going anywhere else, never finding 4/8chan, never even finding reddit…