how do school shooters know how to use guns?
from lystopad@mbin.twink.men to nostupidquestions@lemmy.world on 15 Sep 19:35
https://mbin.twink.men/m/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world/t/10638

since kids aren’t usually allowed to train with guns… were they all training with their parents before? or is it not that hard, so can any person with no expirience technically just pick up a gun and start shooting people?

(asking not 4 myself obvs, just out of curiosity)

#nostupidquestions

threaded - newest

listless@lemmy.cringecollective.io on 15 Sep 19:39 next collapse

parents and family introduce them to guns.

Dunklets@lemmy.world on 15 Sep 19:41 next collapse

I’ve been shooting twice. From my experience it’s shockingly easy the only kinda complicated thing is loading it. I’m sure YouTube has guides on anything that might be complicated.

DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works on 15 Sep 19:44 next collapse

You can learn how to use almost any gun in about five minutes. Have a friend or family member that lets you take some practice shots in their backyard? Now you know enough to be dangerous.

ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works on 15 Sep 20:40 collapse

Even without practice shots, every gun has the capacity to be dangerous no matter the extent of the users knowledge.

fadedmaster@sh.itjust.works on 15 Sep 23:24 collapse

One might even say that a firearm becomes more dangerous in a less knowledgeable person’s hands.

givesomefucks@lemmy.world on 15 Sep 19:44 next collapse

since kids aren’t usually allowed to train with guns

What?

I went to a rural school, and everyone had a “hunters education” class in like 7th grade. We never touched a gun but we could legally go hunting with a gun after.

A shit ton of kids hunt, and most ranges are fine with kids if an adult is with them too.

Like, it varies state to state, but in lots of areas it’s weird for someone to graduate highschool before shooting a gun.

But besides all that, guns aren’t difficult.

so can any person with no expirience technically just pick up a gun and start shooting people?

So yeah, pretty much.

floo@retrolemmy.com on 15 Sep 20:04 next collapse

I learned how to shoot a shotgun when I was 13 at school. We were in the shooting club. It was just shotguns and skeet shooting, but still.

RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world on 15 Sep 20:24 next collapse

I went to a rural school, and everyone had a “hunters education” class in like 7th grade. We never touched a gun but we could legally go hunting with a gun after.

That’s crazy. I had no idea anyone had a class like that. We’re basically training kids to be school shooters… at school?

unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de on 15 Sep 20:36 next collapse

As they said, you really dont need to know much to operate a semi automatic weapon. Everything you need to know is public knowledge that can be found on wikipedia, youtube, etc.

You dont need to be a very good shot if you shoot at 5m distance…

bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de on 15 Sep 20:37 next collapse

You can’t expect parents to do everything.

shalafi@lemmy.world on 15 Sep 22:21 collapse

No, I don’t expect parents who are ignorant about guns to teach their kids safety. We shouldn’t have to, but that’s where we’re at.

Fermion@mander.xyz on 15 Sep 21:08 next collapse

Hunter’s ed is basically the opposite of what you stated. It’s not part of the state curriculum. It’s similar to drivers ed courses for people to be able to get a learners permit before they turn 18. Similarly below a certain ages, most states require completion of a hunter’s education course to be able to purchase a hunting license and legally hunt.

The courses go over topics like property rights, how to carry a weapon making sure it’s not pointing at anyone, what high vis clothing is required, always knowing what is behind an animal before even aiming, rules about how a weapon must be unloaded when in a vehicle, and they strongly urge keeping an interference lock in the action of any firearm in storage.

Hunter’s ed doesn’t teach kids how to shoot, they teach kids how to not be idiots when hunting.

RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world on 15 Sep 21:30 collapse

The person I replied to specifically said it was part of the 7th grade curriculum. Classes like that existing is not surprising, but it being part of middle school curriculum is very surprising to me.

Forester@pawb.social on 15 Sep 22:52 collapse

A large amount of Americans that grew up with firearms in the home learned to shoot at the ages of 5 to 7. The reason those ages are mentioned is because that’s the time that an average human is able to hold a pistol unattended and play with it if they don’t understand the danger. I never wanted to play with guns because I knew what they were and how they worked my entire life. Most of that training will simply be that if you find a firearm unattended, you are supposed to find an adult to attend that firearm. Explaining the dangers of firearms and that anything pointed at by a firearm will be destroyed. Explaining only goes so far. Seeing on the other hand, the power and destruction that can be wrought leaves a much more lasting impression. The main purpose of all of this is because children educated purely through media have many false ideas about firearms and weapons and damage that they can cause.

Media glorifies guns and gun use and violence. In media people get shot all the time and take no real damage for it. It is important to impress upon children that have easy access to firearms that they are tools and weapons and not toys.

Tldr Children are taught about guns for the same reason kids are taught sex education.

shalafi@lemmy.world on 15 Sep 22:20 collapse

Sounds like an elective class. My ex-wife’s niece was in an after-school shotgun club. I gather it was more target practice than hunting.

I’m of the opinion that familiarity with actually shooting is more of a deterrent to the school shooter mentality than fetishizing guns. I’m basing that mostly on the idea that these school shooters can’t seem to handle a weapon, given that kills are the goal.

orbitz@lemmy.ca on 15 Sep 21:56 collapse

Even without much education, I was a geek in a rural location, one time a friend’s dad put a cigarette (half 3/4 done or so) on a fence cause we were having a competition and we hit them all. Mean the cigarette was only say 15 - 20 feet away but I I split it in half with a BB gun (yes no kick of course), probably luck but I was hitting the targets too and the dad figured no one would hit that one. It wasn’t a long range but I figure someone with access to a rifle should shoot fine enough if they practice even a bit if I can without access. I only shot a gun maybe a dozen times in total.

xxce2AAb@feddit.dk on 15 Sep 19:45 next collapse

This is the US we’re talking about, so there’s no shortage of guns or people willing to teach other people to use guns. Sure, I doubt an eight year old could rock up to the local range and lease a weapon, but… there’s always a crazy uncle. Besides that, there’s no shortage of instructional material to be found online and elsewhere. Guns are not particularly complicated devices. Fill magazine with ammunition, insert magazine, pull and release charging handle (or slide), disengage safety (if any), point and pull the trigger. It’s not particularly difficult. Hitting something is a different matter though.

I mean, I’m Danish, and guns are not exactly commonplace here, but I used to shoot pistols for sport in the indoor range beneath a local school starting when I was eleven.

shalafi@lemmy.world on 15 Sep 22:16 collapse

Taught my kids the basics at 9 and 11. They need to understand the lethality of guns, what is safe and not safe, and maybe most importantly, how to recognize someone who is not being safe and get the hell away from them.

Plus, took the mystery out of the whole thing. Now they just don’t care much.

o_oli@lemmy.world on 15 Sep 19:54 next collapse

Not to blame video games but genuinely having never even held a real gun I could definitely work out how to operate one from the thousands of hours I have interacted with them digitally lol. They ultimately are designed ground up to be user friendly and simple. Yes I would be a terrible aim etc but still not the point, an idiot can still cause chaos.

sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml on 15 Sep 19:56 next collapse

Plenty of guides online but also it just isn’t that hard.

SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works on 15 Sep 20:08 next collapse

Learning the manual of arms (procedure of loading, firing, unloading a type of firearm) is a YouTube video away and isn’t hard. If you can use a drill, a stapler or a nerf gun you can figure out how to make a gun go bang.

The difficult part is technique that makes the bullets go where you want them to. Shooting fast is easy, just mag dump in a general direction and you’ll eventually hit something. Shooting slowly and accurately is way more effective and responsible. Basic marksmanship takes a bit of practice to hone but anyone can do it, including you reading this.

But shooting fast AND accurate is a skill that takes consistent practice to hone and keep. That’s what makes competitons like USPSA so challenging

HubertManne@piefed.social on 15 Sep 20:09 next collapse

I heard they make them pretty simple now. Some are even just point and shoot /s

floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 15 Sep 20:17 next collapse

The Internet

neidu3@sh.itjust.works on 15 Sep 20:18 next collapse

I knew how to operate a hunting rifle by the time I was 12, and I’m not even American.

And if you can operate a hunting rifle, you can operate an assault rifle to a reasonable degree. Not much training needed.

And the principle is easy to figure out. When I was in the army, while I was a recruit, this guy in my platoon had never touched a weapon before, and he was pretty nervous the first day on the shooting range because he was on a different training course the day we got introduced to the basics. But he figured it out by intuition; get the cartridge into the chamber, and get the hammer to hit the firing pin.

There are only so many mechanical things one can do with a rifle, and if you try a few things you’re likely to figure it out.

Nougat@fedia.io on 15 Sep 21:10 collapse

When I was in the army, ...

Consider, too, that the military needs every sack of meat to be able to shoot straight, load mags, clear malfunctions, clean and maintain. By extension, the light arms they use are designed to be as dead simple as possible.

shalafi@lemmy.world on 15 Sep 22:11 collapse

As someone on reddit once pointed at, the AR-15 platform is designed such that the dumbest 18-yo recruit can use it.

SuiXi3D@fedia.io on 15 Sep 20:20 next collapse

I mean, my dad took me hunting when I was young...

mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca on 15 Sep 20:26 next collapse

It’s not like they’re complex devices to operate. and the internet has tons of resources.

Widdershins@lemmy.world on 15 Sep 20:39 next collapse

Kids know computers and just like guns it is a point and click interface

lystopad@mbin.twink.men on 15 Sep 20:42 next collapse

1st time i have so many comments on a post... in an hour@

morphballganon@lemmy.world on 15 Sep 20:47 next collapse

The hardest parts of gun use are aiming at long range and proper maintenance. Neither of those are a concern for someone planning to shoot at close range and not live another day.

HC4L@lemmy.world on 15 Sep 21:08 next collapse

YouTube videos?

BassTurd@lemmy.world on 15 Sep 21:09 next collapse

Hand guns are difficult to be accurate with if you’ve never shot one, and still not easy if you have. Nobody is going to fire one for the first time and be good at it, but within 10-15’ the difference is probably just if the shot was lethal or not. Anything with a longer barrel like a shotgun or rifle, as long as you’re pointing in the general direction it’s as simple as pulling the trigger. The recoil is easier to deal with and it’s easier to aim. Loading could take a second to figure out, but that’s something that can be worked out before ever pulling the trigger.

I think the fact that most school shootings don’t end up with dozens of kills is because it’s not super easy to be skilled with all aspects of a firearm, but it’s easy enough for quick damage.

Zozano@aussie.zone on 15 Sep 21:39 collapse

It’s always blown my mind that school shootings are all relatively low in number compared to what you’d expect from someone with intent to kill as many people as they could.

The deadliest shooting was Virginia Tech; 32 killed, 17 wounded.

That’s barely two classrooms full of students.

I’ve got no experience with guns, but I feel like it’s nothing short of a miracle that the shooters are such a poor shot.

shalafi@lemmy.world on 15 Sep 22:09 collapse

Gunshot wounds are surprisingly survivable given swift medical attention. Which astounds my because I know a fair deal about guns, shoot most weeks, and know what various weapons and rounds are capable of.

I’m guessing the shooters are scared shitless and shaking like leaves. I doubt most are as cold blooded and methodical as the Columbine shooters. I’m also guessing the Colorado shooter lost his nerve in a hurry when he saw the consequences of his actions. The vast majority of wounds don’t seem to be anything like the Charlie Kirk fountain. In a way they’re more horrifying because the victim drops like a puppet with their strings cut, not much blood at first, no drama, just dropped straight down. Somehow that scares me more.

That incident being, in my opinion, the beginning of these shootings. Shit like this simply didn’t happen when I was a growing up, 70s through 90s. And civilians had access to the AR platform that whole time.

Funny thing about Virginia Tech, most of his kills were from his .22 pistol, about the last gun we would ever ban. That guy was calmly going for a high score. Again, that seems very atypical. Las Vegas shooter was the same particular brand of batshit insane.

Another shooting that should have been worse was the Aurora movie theater. Dumbass used a tacticool high-capacity mag. No, not the 30-round mag the gun was designed for, it was either a 50 or 100-round. It jammed almost instantly, because of course. LOL, I absolutely support idiot mags like that.

Kolanaki@pawb.social on 15 Sep 21:10 next collapse

It’s not like using a gun is hard. Training is more about maintenance and safety as well as accuracy. You don’t need to be accurate if you’re iust firing indiscriminately into a crowd at close range and you also probably don’t give a fuck about safety or maintenance.

solrize@lemmy.ml on 15 Sep 21:14 next collapse

TN students now required to learn gun safety beginning in kindergarten

shalafi@lemmy.world on 15 Sep 21:52 collapse

I’m actually for this. No, it shouldn’t be necessary, but it is and that’s that.

Taught my kids guns at 9 and 11. Took them out to our camp and shot a bunch of different .22s. Now instead of guns being these mysterious things “you should never touch”, well, they’ve touched and just aren’t really interested. LOL, that was 100% against my custody agreement, but I was terrified the kids would find someone’s gun one day and have Hollywood perceptions. Their mom didn’t say a word, which was really strange, so I believe she agrees.

One interesting thing I showed then was shooting an empty can with a .22. “See how that made a little hole of both sides? That’s what many people think guns do. But people are juicy, so it looks more like this.” They shit kittens when I shot a can full of water and it absolutely shredded. I think that was impactful. :)

I taught them never to pick up someone’s gun for the same reason even professionals won’t do so. “It’s not because I think you’re dumb kids, but you don’t know anything about that particular gun. What if there’s something wrong with it? How can you tell if it’s loaded? When you’re older, never accept a gun from a person who does not first clear it and show you the empty chamber. Even professionals do this. If they don’t practice this simple etiquette, they are not to be trusted and you need to get away, and stay away from that person.” Later overheard my son telling his big sis, in great detail and with great authority this rule.

Gonna suck when they’re teens. If they’re emotional wrecks like I was, they won’t see a gun in this house.

bradorsomething@ttrpg.network on 16 Sep 00:32 collapse

Glad to hear you doing this. My daughter refuses to learn, but I keep telling her it’s so when the dumb boy pulls out a gun at a party, she can ask to see it, and clear the chamber, take the clip, safe it, and hand it (minus the clip) back.

Una@piefed.europe.pub on 15 Sep 22:15 next collapse

I am from Croatia, we have 1 rifle at home (hunting) and as a child I remember we will sometimes put plastic bottle and aim for bottle, so I guess similar is in USA? In rural places specifically. Of course it was all done with multiple of adults nearby. But I was always bad at it, and I am still scared to go near guns (intrusive thoughts)

aesthelete@lemmy.world on 15 Sep 23:32 next collapse

They just aren’t that hard to use.

As Thelma says, “can’t be that hard, idiots use them all of the time”.

Friendlybirdseggs@sopuli.xyz on 15 Sep 23:41 next collapse

The point of guns was to make warfare easier

wjrii@lemmy.world on 16 Sep 00:12 next collapse

I learned to shoot at Boy Scout camp when I was about 13. We shot .22 long rifle and 20 gauge shotguns. Many of my friends hunted (never appealed to me) and learned even earlier.

Sunsofold@lemmings.world on 16 Sep 00:34 next collapse

It takes real, practiced skill and/or quality equipment to hit a bullseye at long range, or to kill an armed opponent at short range quickly and cleanly enough to not give them the chance to shoot you back. It takes no skill to hit an undefended, person-sized object at <10 meters, the distances involved in most indoor locations.

Contramuffin@lemmy.world on 16 Sep 01:11 collapse

Shooting is like driving a car. A baby could do it. Few can do it safely.

Using a gun is really easy. And I suspect school showers aren’t particularly concerned about safety, so that’s not an issue for them