Why it so dangerous to unmask images?
from cheese_greater@lemmy.world to nostupidquestions@lemmy.ca on 27 Apr 13:57
https://lemmy.world/post/46126496

Baudrillard says

it is dangerous to unmask images, since they dissimulate the fact that there is nothing behind them).

#nostupidquestions

threaded - newest

henfredemars@infosec.pub on 27 Apr 14:33 next collapse

What does this mean?

Nemo@slrpnk.net on 27 Apr 14:53 next collapse

Gonna need to unpack this one a bit more, Cheese.

cheese_greater@lemmy.world on 27 Apr 15:37 collapse

Updated

Lumidaub@feddit.org on 27 Apr 15:50 next collapse

Unpack more.

Nemo@slrpnk.net on 27 Apr 16:09 collapse

Okay, so Baudrillard’s thing was the idea he called “hyperreality”: images, symbols, branding, and other representations that penetrate deep enough into our consciousness that they become more real to us than the physical world. In the above quote, I think he’s describing the effects of removing or destroying these hyperreal symbols; we’re left not with physical reality but with nothing, which is damaging psychologically.

BUT I haven’t read Baudrillard in detail so take my analysis with a grain of salt. I’m viewing this though the lens of Platonic forms and the whole cave allegory and all that because it was the closest philosophical concept that’s both familiar to me and seemed to map.

BiteSizedZeitGeist@lemmy.world on 27 Apr 15:01 next collapse

Bro read “No Stupid Questions” and took it as a challenge

Mothra@mander.xyz on 27 Apr 15:57 collapse

Sir, the questions can be stupid but they must remain coherent please