What happens when you try to watch two different shows side by side at the same time?
from sopularity_fax@sopuli.xyz to nostupidquestions@lemmy.ca on 16 Nov 03:39
https://sopuli.xyz/post/36783600

In your brain, or if you listen to a song and the same song delayed for a moment?

#nostupidquestions

threaded - newest

TootSweet@lemmy.world on 16 Nov 03:42 next collapse

You’d process each of them less than half as well as if you’d watched it on its own?

phaedrus@piefed.world on 16 Nov 05:51 collapse

<img alt="bilbo baggins' birthday speech" src="https://c.tenor.com/yZXo5x1BkQUAAAAd/tenor.gif">

breezeblock@lemmy.ca on 16 Nov 04:03 next collapse

You cannot. If you tried you’d just be watching one and then the other, with your brain interpolating between takes.

Oka@sopuli.xyz on 16 Nov 05:03 next collapse

Try it, for science. Then try and recall b o th shows separately.

SeptugenarianSenate@leminal.space on 16 Nov 05:22 next collapse

Take lots of stimulant beforehand, and maybe slow down each shows’ playback by 10-20%, I see no problem with this pass-time (I would get a headache after 3 minutes or so of trying, especially so if they were completely different shows, or are both from a show I have not seen yet).

RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 16 Nov 07:46 next collapse

You’re not gonna remember them both particularly well.

Source: I split my laptop screen into pieces with video and games, and both suffer for it

Drusas@fedia.io on 16 Nov 08:17 next collapse

When "multitasking", the brain rapidly switches between processing the different tasks.

cynar@lemmy.world on 16 Nov 08:29 collapse

Most areas of our brain can only do 1 task at a time. If you try and do more, it flips rapidly between them. Basically, you would “watch” vaguely 30-50% of each show, with your brain trying to fill in the gaps.

Interestingly, you can do 2 tasks that don’t share significant resources. This is how you can both drive a car and listen to a podcast. It’s also why you suddenly need to turn down the music when you need to navigate, or park. Those require use of general cognition, which the music/podcast was using.

An interesting example of this is time keeping. Some people can talk and keep an accurate mental timer. However they will lose track when looking at images. Others will be the reverse, or something different.

It turns out that humans don’t have a consistent time keeping mental circuit. We hijack other systems. If you “hear” the time passing, you will struggle to also hear someone talking without issues. If you visualise a clock, you can talk, but your visual cognition is now occupied.

Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe on 16 Nov 15:55 collapse

Wow, this is really interesting, thanks for the summation.

If I wanted to read more (say entry level stuff), would you have a recommendation?

cynar@lemmy.world on 16 Nov 17:28 collapse

Unfortunately, I don’t have any links to hand. It’s mostly pop sci level stuff I’ve picked up from various places.

The time one I want to say was Richard Feynman. Though an informal experiment on fellow professors in the lunch room. Possibly from his autobiography, which is an excellent read either way.

Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe on 18 Nov 15:00 collapse

Well, Feynman’s a start anyway. Thanks!