Why is it called linux phone?
from Mower2560@reddthat.com to nostupidquestions@lemmy.ca on 16 Sep 05:43
https://reddthat.com/post/50150988

cross-posted from: reddthat.com/post/50150808

Like isnt android linux already? Why Not just fork it if everyone is unsatisfied with google and pushes for linux phones?

Am I missing something?

#nostupidquestions

threaded - newest

lvxferre@mander.xyz on 16 Sep 06:25 collapse

Linux is only a kernel. It isn’t a full operating system; it’s only a small (albeit central) part of one. Everything else is components like the GNU utils, X and/or Wayland, so goes on. That’s why some people call Debian, Fedora, Arch etc. “GNU/Linux distributions”, to highlight that those components are damn important.

Android uses the Linux kernel (or a modification of), but it lacks practically every single other thing you’d see in a common GNU/Linux distribution. And applications are incompatible - you can’t run Android applications in, say, Debian, nor vice versa.

And, more importantly, Android lacks what makes GNU/Linux worth using: commitment to free and open source software (FOSS).

Sure, you can fork Android. Some already did it; it’s called GrapheneOS. But when people say they want a “Linux phone”, they mean they want a phone version of a GNU/Linux distribution, because of that commitment to FOSS. You don’t get it from Android.